RR

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 6 лис 2024

КОМЕНТАРІ • 19

  • @rudi5764
    @rudi5764 3 роки тому +7

    Incredible episode. So many questions answered that I had for a long time. Thank you all!

  • @Martin-qb2mw
    @Martin-qb2mw 2 роки тому +3

    Fantastic interview. As Ben says: If you can't explain a stock market anomaly then it's not useful as a predictor (not a direct quote obviously). This guy has the explanations and knows when there aren't any.

  • @LHK2
    @LHK2 3 роки тому +9

    First !
    These academic finance guests are great.

  • @henryvasquez7665
    @henryvasquez7665 3 роки тому +10

    59:36 doggo: He's talking to himself again...

  • @BitsOfInterest
    @BitsOfInterest 3 роки тому +21

    Wow, this is not a play in the background episode, this is pay attention to this lecture and rewind if you missed something, LOL 😋

    • @gregmanderson78
      @gregmanderson78 3 роки тому +1

      For sure. I started this at 2am while up for feeding my newborn twins and i got 5 mins in and decided its WAY too early for this stuff. 😴

  • @stevehazeltine6487
    @stevehazeltine6487 3 роки тому +3

    Can anyone provide some links or resources to explain rough numbers for what might be considered a “very” profitable stock?

    • @nemuritai
      @nemuritai 3 роки тому +4

      From FF2015,
      "profitability (measured with accounting data for the fiscal year ending in t-1) is annual revenues minus cost of goods
      sold, interest expense, and selling, general, and administrative expenses, all divided by book equity at the end of fiscal year t-1. We call this variable operating profitability, OP, but it is operating profitability
      minus interest expense. "
      Investment is calculated as "the growth of total assets for the fiscal year ending in t-1 divided by total
      assets at the end of t-1."

    • @stevehazeltine6487
      @stevehazeltine6487 3 роки тому +4

      @@nemuritai Let me rephrase : I’m not asking for what profitability IS- I actually understand that- I’m asking what range of numbers might be considered as “very” profitable. They talk about high and low profitability in this episode, but I don’t actually know what “high” is.

  • @innerscorecard9433
    @innerscorecard9433 3 роки тому +1

    Around the 25 min mark. I think it is an error to assume that the signals are orthogonal in nature. In fact, a multi factor model may be looking for interaction terms. I think Partha Mohanram's work really is about exploiting interaction terms and bayesian effects

  • @logoutjason4689
    @logoutjason4689 2 роки тому +1

    so for long-term capital appreciation and overall total returns is the consensus that best results are more likely when invested in a Total stock market, almost free ETF like VTI, or go with something with a factor tilt like aVantis and pay the extra .12 in expense ratio. I think that's what they were trying to ask him but I still feel confused

  • @masafelipe7033
    @masafelipe7033 3 роки тому

    So, its harmful to combine quality and value factor etfs in same portfolio? In MSCI paper combining factors seems that buying both indexes gets good results.

  • @khalidkhalaiwi3348
    @khalidkhalaiwi3348 3 роки тому +5

    As Ben says : investment is solved

  • @a.j.4644
    @a.j.4644 3 роки тому +3

    30:11 I'm only halfway through the video, but I gotta know: Did someone let the 🐩 poodle in??? S/he looks ready to contribute to the discussion.

    • @Mosesusorer
      @Mosesusorer 3 роки тому +1

      Dog: “A market crash is coming soon y’all. You’ve been warned!”

  • @ajrobbins368
    @ajrobbins368 3 роки тому

    Thank you!

  • @70qq
    @70qq Рік тому

    ty

  • @naif897
    @naif897 3 роки тому +2

    it would me amazing if you could make a video about that paper and try to explain it in simpler way
    I would really appreciate that

  • @sleepless2541
    @sleepless2541 2 роки тому

    52:53