As a therapist working in home health in eastern kentucky. I had several miners that i worked with. One miner who was clear and coherent. Stated he encountered a 50+foot snake fossil compressed under coal seam.
Being a native of WV, and being an underground coal miner. When I first started working in the mines, it didn't take long at all to see for myself. That the coal seams I have worked in, hadn't been there for "millions of years". My family has a long line of miners, and all of us have found some incredible fossils and artifacts encased in coal. Things that should not have been there, based on the "billions of years" theory.
Great production values. No crazy oblique camera shots that destroy the intimacy of the video. No banal 'hello everyone' openings, that distance the presenter from the viewer. Professional from beginning to end.
A large swamp's bottom should look flat, except for the edges. The coal-making material would collect on the large flat bottom and less on the edges. Then a lot piles upon the pre-coal material. Should make a horizontal bottom coal bed.
@@m0x910 Coal has a reductive effect on solubilized iron, turning it from Fe3+ to Fe2+. Fool's goal is FeS2 (pyrite) pointing to the overall redox environment in coal seams. The same effect coal has on other elements, especially uranium. Thus Uranium is trapped in coal as UO2 (uraninite). Uranium is radioactive, providing the neutrons to turn nitrogen (14 isotope) from coal into carbon14. SO, it provides the answer to this fake dilemma.
Here in the USA, a coal mine fire has been burning under Centralia, Pennsylvania since 1962. That shows just how vast the coal deposit is at that location.
Just a quick mention. The heat that was required to cause coal formation would not have needed volcanic action to exist. Decaying vegetation can produce enough heat to cause spontaneous combustion… just ask a farmer what happens when hay that is too damp is baled-up…
@@hwd71 - Richard Dawkins has no credibility in my eyes. He ignores obvious evidence to maintain his godless worldview. The flood is obvious - coal, oil fields, methane, continent-sized sedimentary rock layers, massive canyons - these things on every continent.
He never said that roots were never found. He said the preserved tree trunks were found without them. There wasn't enough mass there to preserve them. You're arguing from a determined outcome.
I just listened to it. He said you do find some but most don't have roots. A tree without roots is dead. Yet evolution wants you to believe they have grown through many layers that they say took millions of years to form. And then became fossilized. That's nonsense you see dead trees rot and fall down long before it can fossilized and they have their roots in tact. Evolutionists want you to disbelieve what your own eyes see
I worked in a surface coal mine for 16 years and I remember finding petrified trees as deep as 250 ft below the ground while we were removing the coal.
In New Zealand at a Lime works where the lime is used for agriculture its been found that below the lime seams is coal that gives evidence of a flood depositing event
Carbon-14 in coal is produced by radioactive decay of uranium-thorium isotope series that is naturally found in rocks (and which is found in varying concentrations in different rocks, hence the variation in carbon-14 content in different coals). It does not cause a problem zeroing instruments 0 is 0 and coal is not used as a reference.
After some research it actually looks viable! It's funny that most science seems to believe carbon-14 cannot be created through alpha decay but I could see it, and I could even see their entire theory on how c-14 is created in the atmosphere being wrong. Alphas have the extra proton, which is ejected upon the creation of c-14. That said, in the same rabbit hole I found a lot of issues; mainly that if small environmental effects like that can contaminate the dating methods, none can be trusted. If radioactive material can be created through multiple different avenues, then it can also be degraded. Throw enough energy at the earth and you could rapidly create or degrade anything.
This is literally a lie created to fool uneducated people. Carbon 14 is formed in the atmosphere by radiation interacting with nitrogen. There’s a chemical equation for this reaction! Perhaps you could show us the chemical equation for uranium-thorium yielding carbon isotopes 😂🤡
@@ciprianpopa1503 Is English your third language? Because that gibberish ..oh wait it was an example of how brain just chemically reacts to its own electrical impulses and taps out what brain tells it to tap out.
@@xtnese yeap English is my third communication language. That gibberish paints an exact picture of your state of mind and your level of understanding of science or any other serious topic for that matter. Your "humor", if one can call humor those non sense words listed above, is so dry that it makes Sahara look like the deepest ocean.
@@xtnese BTW why don't you propose this Dr. if you love him? He can tell you stories and you can sleep ok ever after. You can also try sex, if you can manage to stay awake.
Well then just post the name of the study and not the actual links. I have had this same problem multiple times. If somebody was truly interested all they would have to do is Google the name of the papers. It works most of the time.
Dr. Walker, you didn't mention C14 in coal. I would expect to see C14 in every coal seam and that that would be the strongest argument against great age if C14 were in the atmosphere at the time of the Flood. So is C14 ubiquitous in coal? If not then I would conclude that high energy cosmic rays were not prevalent before the Flood.
From our article, 'How carbon dating works' ( creation.com/how-carbon-dating-works ) "Carbon dating has also been applied to coal, from ‘20-million-year-old’ Miocene coal to ‘300-million-year-old’ Pennsylvanian coal. Every coal sample contained carbon-14. They even contained approximately the same amount of carbon-14. There is no way to physically contaminate all the coal in the world with carbon-14. The evidence is that coal is young, because there should not be any carbon-14 left in anything that that is claimed to be millions of years in age."
@@creationministriesintl Thanks! From reading Dr. Carter's article I'm going to assume that most coal samples which have ever been tested have measurable C14. And if that's the case then no other arguments are needed to prove a "young" Earth. The entire Old Earth argument collapses. End of discussion.
@@thepeaksandthetroughs Really? What part of so-called "evolution" is a fact according to observational science? If you are referring to things adapting over time, such as dogs becoming other kinds of dogs, this is called speciation, which, yes, is verified by observational science; however, if you mean "chemical evolution" (*molecules to man) or if you mean, animals "evolving" into Humans over time; those ideas are simply not supported by observational science (* instead those ideas are modern mythology and philosophy tied to a kind of forensic science).
Modern physics doesn't accept Newton's laws of gravity.. it was refined and reviewed. Maybe apologists should stop pulling a dead horse and pick up a science book written in this century. The real laughing stock are those who bring the literal 6 days creation stories to the public today.. and people actually do that today.
@@StudentDad-mc3pu darwin was a known mason , they reject evolution and believe the athiest to be a fool , hes a liar by trade..........which is what is so insulting to you guys listening to such nonsense , they are intentional lies from someone who believes nothing he spoke , as per free mason requirements
@@StudentDad-mc3pu Why then is not every geological formation and every stratum full of such intermediate links? Geology assuredly does not reveal any such finely graduated organic chain; and this, perhaps, is the most obvious and gravest objection which can be urged against my theory. ~ Charles Darwin 😂
So...? How do the multiple layers or "seams" of coal with hundreds of ft. between them, fit into this theoretical explanation? On the 5 seam i found immaculate preservations of fern, thorn branches, tree branches; on the 6 seam roughly 100ft higher in the rock strata (closer to the surface on top of the 5 seam) i only find sea shells, shark teeth, and sand dollars. The Mt. Saint Helens model( a singular event) does support rapid formation but for only one seam;and still presents issues with the log mats; not all seams present in our geology which raises questions more so than provides answers.
Have you ever stopped to think that different layers could have been caused by different catastrophic events that cause local flooding in certain areas. There is one seam of coal worldwide, that suggests a worldwide flood but all the other seams of coal are local. There have been numerous volcanic explosions/incidents and also various tsunamis and other disasters that could have formed these regional seams.
If you study the geology in the Gulf Of Mexico, of which I have had the opportunity to see firsthand, having worked very many drilling operations, and recorded the lithology, you would find that there is a massive alluvial bed of Shell Fragments, a couple 100 feet thick at about 1/4-1/2 mile beneath the sea bottom reaching out about 100+ miles into, and across the Gulf. This would indicate a massive outflow from the Mississippi River Basin area, and across the Gulf Coast, into the Gulf during the global flood.
What you said was fine until you added the 'global flood' nonsense. The deposit you described is clearly made up of thousands of generations of animals. Chalk deposits, which are far older, need even more animals to have died.
@@guillermoa.nerygomez8782a local flood producing a 100 foot thick layer of shells? LOL.. a local flood wouldn't even produce a one inch thick layer of shells over any area.
@@michaelyork4554 Not talking about a small flood, mind you, it could be a massive one, just not worldwide. Such events have been found to occur as glacial eras ended and glacial lakes suddenly broke their dams. But another option is that the area was not quite ocean at some point in the past, rather the vicinity of a river delta, and stayed so for enough years as to develop that deposit.
I believe the super high volcanic mountains we see today were created during the flood. Think about it logically. The 'fountains of the deep' opened up and massive volcanic activity was happening at the same time, the rapidly cooling lava would have stacked in one spot and made an underwater mound which, with continued volcanic activity would have made the mound 'snowball' and get bigger and bigger and form an underwater mountain which would have been exposed when the water receded, leaving a mountain. The slow collision of continents doesn't seem enough to create such high mountain ranges. Not to mention, most volcanic mountains, when erupting out of water do not get taller, maybe thicker and more rounded but not taller. They actually fragment and break apart and sometimes even explode like Mt. Saint Helens, leaving the remaining mountain much smaller. The only way such huge mountains could be formed quickly in my opinion, is to be from immense volcanic activity during a time of water covering the earth. I'm not a geologist or a vulcanologist so I cannot say it's a 100% certainty but it seems more consistent with the young earth/rapid formation timeline.
@@kevinrussell1144 That's the thing, I don't need an IF. I've got the details in the Bible. It explains everything. Even things that science can't explain yet. I KNOW it's true. Not because of any empirical evidence, but because the Lord has changed my life so drastically for the better and I see His works everyday, not just in my life but in those around me. More and more evidence of Biblical events is being found everyday and scientists still can't figure out how evolution could even start because the cell parts needed for division and eventual merging are not able to be made before the cell decays and dies. Life cannot come from non life and something cannot come from nothing, it's impossible and unobservable, therefore scientifically impossible to replicate or even observe. As far as geology, there is way more evidence for a young earth and a global flood than there is of anything else, even in core samples. Layers that science says were laid down over thousands of years have no sign of biological growth in between, which would have occurred between the layers if they were laid down over a long period. It's more likely that they were laid down quickly all at once which would explain the lack of biological material between the layers. There are many other examples of inconsistencies in scientific explanation, like how rock layers can be bent without breaking if they were laid down over long periods of time, more likely mud was laid down and bent while still soft, then turned into sedimentary stone after being bent. Anyways, I don't want to 'convince' you of anything, you have to come to faith on your own terms, if at all. I really pray that you do, it's so freeing and opens up a whole new world and takes the 'glasses' off and let's you see the world the way it truly is. Maybe check out the Institute For Creation Research channel and you will see many videos of geological, biological and even cosmic evidence that will change the way you see things for the better. Stay safe.
@@kevinrussell1144 As far as something coming from nothing, I should have clarified. Life cannot come from non-life, a living cell cannot come from a non living primordial pool of goo or whatever else science tries to say happened in the beginning. Even scientists in a laboratory with expensive high tech equipment cannot make a living cell, complete with programming, from non living components. They can replicate cells using other cells that were already alive but they cannot replicate anything like they claim happened to start life. No matter how many non living items you put into an area, no matter how many lightning strikes, no matter the heat level, life cannot come from non life. Nothing ever observed has created life from non life. Nothing attempted has been able to produce results even close to what is needed for life to pop out of nowhere. Anyway, like I said, you probably don't want the truth or even watch these videos, just come to flaunt your expertise and argue with comments. This is the last comment I'll make because trying to convince anyone of anything is futile, especially when they are embedded with a worldview which filters all their information to fit their embedded beliefs. Good bye, Peace out, stay safe.
The same good fortune to you, friend. You can think what you want about my motives, but like you, I'm simply trying to figure out the truth of things. Yes, stay safe. I fear we're all in for tough times ahead.@@ichitoburrito1359
Stay safe. You are allowed to question my motives and dismiss me just as much as we're all encouraged to question the motives and good intentions of the Drug Cartels, Joe, or Trump. Like you, I'm trying to discover the truth to the best of my understanding. And yeah, it's tough for anyone to change someone else's mind about anything, let alone change his own views.@@ichitoburrito1359
There was a Sumerian metal bell found in a coal seam in the USA. Associates for Biblical Research and Institute for Creation Research. Have shown so much excellent research. Their research is pretty technical and many decades long now. I love their programs and publications
@iaindcosta The hammer is identical with late 19th-century mining hammers and the most likely explanation is that it was encased in a deposit of highly-soluble travertine within a relatively short time.
@klouis1886 ..I can accept that as a good possibility, rocks and deposits can form quickly, maybe coal too? Diamonds don't take as long to form as they told us when I was a lad.. A lot of what I was taught as a lad has turned out to be false.
Great video, coal is fast fossilized tree bark, not a single fiber of tree trunk. At the flood the waves uprooted the trees and they formed monstrous rafts like on Spirit Lake Washington. Spirit lake coal was fully formed in one week.
do we find microscopic marine fossils in coal seams? if the great flood deposited these seams of trees and vegetation, shouldn't we find fossilized plankton for example, and what not, in coal? And within the sand stones above and below the coal seams?
😂 yes evolution is so such a crazy concept and I thought this as a child and I always wondered why hasn’t anything ever evolved into something new or better…? Only thing I see happening is things dyeing off
RAPID speciation is actually an important part of the biblical creation model (e.g. see creation.com/speciation-is-not-evolution and creation.com/speedy-species-surprise ). But speciation within a kind (e.g. 'family')-usually as a result of natural selection-is NOT evolution. (See creation.com/natural-selection-evolution ) SELECTING genetic traits is very different from CREATING brand new ones, and that is where evolution has huge problems. (And mutation isn't up to the job. See creation.com/mutations-and-information )
@83Bongo mutation is not evolution... even the PhDs will admit they've only ever observed 'micro-evolution' ... on top of that the idea of a simple/single cell organism A) is a misnomer and B) has to have somehow generated itself? ... the idea of evolution in virtually all of the sciences is forced. The evidence just doesn't support it.
@@freebanking coal is formed when materials containing carbon decay under pressure. It contains rock and other sediment plus many volatile chemical compounds. Charcoal is formed when materials containing carbon are heated/burned until all of the volatile chemical compounds are burned off. Charcoal does not have to be under pressure to form. Charcoal is often used for outdoor grilling.
@@haggismcbaggis9485 I see folded mountains and think all those layers had to be soft at the same time when they were bent without breaking at the folds. I
@@haggismcbaggis9485 I used to live by the Ouachita mountains in Arkansas. No metamorphosis at the folds. Sandstone, mudstone and limestone only. The documentary "Is Genesis History Mountains after the Flood" details the folded strata at the Kaibab upwarp in the Grand Canyon showing no metamorphosis at the folds. Think about it. We only witness earthquakes at fault lines today. Rigid rock under tension creating earthquakes, not bending
@@haggismcbaggis9485 The more you research this topic, the more a single catastrophic global flood answers many anomalies that uniformitarianistism can't answer. You will begin to see the assumptions needed to believe old age rocks
A casual google search for man-made items found in coal says a lot, I found one video of 20 items found in coal, and the coal was of course dated to many tens of millions of years old, with the items in the coal. but there are those so convinced that they will hatch all kinds of conspiracy theories to explain away such items, if you follow much of this at all the number of times they have to resort to made up stories about such things is amazing in and of itself, that does not mean what you think it means here let me explain what that really means, over and over and over ad nauseum, countless dragon legends around the world, just about every culture has a flood story, the Ica stones, Acámbaro figures, Indian pictographs, the evidence is there but people would rather cling to evolution and therefore explain away the evidence anyway they can or try to discredit the evidence anyway they can. Its just like Mary Schweitzer, 4:50 I had One reviewer tell me that he 4:52 didn't care what the data said he knew 4:55 that what I was Finding wasn't possible 4:57 says Schweitzer I wrote back and said 5:00 well what data would convince you and he 5:02 said 5:04 none This has nothing to do cold hard factual evidence, but a predisposition that they will not have anything that will point to a young earth and the Creator of it. "Sciences alternative to an Intelligent Creator: The Multiverse Theory," Discover Magazine December 2008. "If there is only one universe you might have to have a Fine-tuner, "If you don't want God, you'd better have a multiverse” And there it is in a nutshell, they do not want God, so any other explanation is preferable than to accept God. Any old story no matter how implausible or farfetched is better than The Biblical God for them.
*_Eph _**_4:14_**_ That we henceforth be no more children, tossed to and fro, and carried about with every wind of doctrine, by the sleight of men, and cunning craftiness, whereby they lie in wait to deceive;_* *_- KJB_*
I believe coal being at various levels proves evolution. As we know the Earth has been through numerous extinction events. The latest one being approximately 12,000 years ago. It’s kinda odd that so many civilizations forgot to drown and left writings and artifacts that young earthers tell us was the time of Noah’s flood.
The flood would have consisted of multiple tsunamis going in and out as the land was raising or falling. This could easily explain why different layers contain fossils from different areas or biomes.
This week I've had a discussion on a geology FB group I'm on regarding the Capital Reef National Park Cathedral Valley, in the US...rapid deposition of sediments. Had the usual keyboard warrior abuse and dismissal, but one guy calmed down so was able to rationally engage with him for couple of exchanges. It wasn't coal we were addressing, rather the beautiful layering evident in the 'cathedrals'. Interesting to hear you Tas, mention the possibility of continent/ocean reversal during the Flood. This makes more sense to me than catastrophic plate tectonics. The preflood continents scoured down, and all the material that made them up, being washed into the preflood ocean basins. The trajectory of water flow and sedimentation is downhill, so eroded material on continents went downhill out into the oceans where tens of thousands of metres of sediment built up before being uplifted to form present day continents.
Another memorial for Noah’s Flood is the Moon, Earth rock was discovered peppered all over the Moon side that faces the Earth. Our atmosphere was much closer before that historic day. Also the backside of the Moon is much smoother but is peppered with meteorite impacts. What a protection God has provided for us.
@@klouis1886 Not saying that it's true that Earth rock has been "peppered" all over the moon, but we have found at least one rock that seems to have terrestrial origin: solarsystem.nasa.gov/news/820/earths-oldest-rock-found-on-the-moon/
tree sap is probably all different the evergreen the non evergreen some sap is blood red from the dragon tree this stuff turns to different things according to the marble and granite that were different kinds trees
@@rclose23 it does have deposits. First Google search results show 143 billion tonnes of coal and 25 billion barrels of oil. I'm pretty sure there's a story every several years of an accident in their coal mines.
Is your proposal as to the basis of the flood as described in the Bible - rain for 40 days and 40 nights? Some other commentators seem to be moving towards an alternative theory such as a meteor impact?
The Bible also says that there was violent volcanic activity and upheaval of the ocean floors. It wasn't just a bunch of rain. It changed the geology of the earth completely.
Because we're a sceptical bunch in Australia, the media and schools system when I was growing up was always shoving evolution down our throats. I became a YEC not long after my conversion when the Lord led me to Answers In Genesis. I finally found the alternative explanations to explain the data in the YEC model rather than evolution.
People are so caught up in young/old earth that they are missing very important biblical lessons that are relevant in our lives. Whether it's young or old doesn't matter when it comes to learning about God and learning valuable lessons about our sinful nature and other human characteristics. The age of coal does not affect anything when it comes biblical inspiration and lessons. It's like this....In the movie Mr. Mom with Michael Keaton, he is trying to tell some co-workers a story to inspire them, but they are so caught up in the details that they destroy that actual lesson Keaton is trying to teach them.
@@smarterworkout uhh I do believe God is causing all this proof to come out…I do believe it’s part of His plan to debunk the darkness, just as he says to “expose the darkness” that’s one of the missions He has entrusted us with. When you’re a baby Christian you might only think of developing personal character but a mature one will be able to balance more responsibilities.
Hi The established geological faculty seems to have no trouble ascribing uniformatism to geological processes but baulks at the idea that CATASTROPHES CAN BE EQUALLY WORLD WIDE !😮
This was truly informative. I had to agree with the scientist that Cole truly does prove the flood! Praise the Lord Jesus Christ hallelujah! And another thing that proves the flood, the rainbow God said he put the bow in the sky as a remembrance. Hallelujah!
I just wanted to comment that I found the topic of the Flood very informative because most all of use have a idea of what the flood means yet so not understand what exactly took place and the evidence to put it into perspective.
I praying for my pastor who is having a hard time with schooling opinions. Could we pray for hi And them to have Science becoming a puzzle of god and how going IMRAD I Is not persuasive God bless
I don't think it's a young earth I just think the last catastrophe was what we call Noah. I just think that the previous ones were not needed in our biblical account or necessary for our understanding. Trim the fat and pass down the relevant. I actually believe we have been around way way longer than science wants to credit us for and I believe the earth is older than what science wants to believe. Time is a very incredibly resilient force and we know it changes!
Love it. God’s Word is absolutely 💯% accurate, praise God. Thank you for this ministry, so, so interesting. So the coal we are using and burning today was the vegetation on the earth prior to Noah’s flood, Wow.
I serve the God of Creation, through his Only Begotten Son, the Lord Jesus Christ! The God of Creation knew what he was doing when he caused Noah's Flood, the proof is undeniable. I enjoyed this interview, thankyou so much Creation Ministries International, and thank you to a good Host! Blessings from David, on Vancouver Island, B.C., Canada
I am a Christian so I am on your side and truly believe God created the universe and the earth. I am a physician and An amateur astronomer with an interest in physics. While I agree with your discussions on the formation of coal. Formation of carbon on the other hand is a different story. Carbon and more complex elements from what we know can only be formed by nuclear fusion in stars. So the coal that was on the earth must have come from a dead star. I do not know whether stars are young or old but I think they probably have to be older than 6000 years unless God had a different mechanism for their formation. If they are only thousands of years old then we should see them being formed fairly regularly throughout the universe and Galaxy. But we do not. I truly believe God created all this but I do not know how. However this should not be the hill you should die on in terms of believing in God and Jesus Christ. The most important thing to know is that he died for our sins and rose from the dead so we know that what he said was true
This is awesome! I just recently started commenting on UA-cam about this realization a few months ago! You should also include the incredible coincidence that coal was a recent discovery in China when it started washing up on their beaches! If coal was older then we would have discovered it a long time ago!
This is not a problem for science or for the Bible. It is a problem on how religious leaders interpret the Bible....very much the same as the Vatican hanging Galileo for claiming the Earth is not the center of the universe.
Oh and supplementary question please? Can we not use dendrochronology to confirm the date of the flood? Sorry to bother you, you probably get asked these questions all the time.
More UTTER NONSENSE and impossible explanations. You simply could not have had enough vegetation on the surface to have formed the coal seems we see today - it took generations of plants over hundreds of years, if not thousands to form the deep peat bogs and swamps that eventually formed coal. Chalk is the same, as is lime stone.
This proves that some scientists are just jokers. To forget that it takes millions of years for the dead vegetation to reach those high temperatures, because that only happens in the deep layers of the earth and where the pressure is high enough. Coal found on the surface, is even older.The geological movement of the earth's layers due to tectonics pushes the aerth layers up. This is how mountains form and ancient layers are exposed
Wood. Water. Vegetation. Wood. Pressure vessel. heat. Your explanation makes no sense. That much different heat and different pressure to form different coal makes no sense. Look up people that do research like that for a living to find if this makes sense. Answer. Not in timeline of a few thousand yrs.
If all vegetation and seeds were destroyed by the Flood, explain how grass and trees were able to regrow in time enough for all the herbivores released from the ark to survive?
Some maybe, but how long do they take to germinate and grow to a sufficient size to be useful and where was the soil for them to grow? How many of the selected animals did the carnivores kill? Without a second creation miracle it just doesn't add up!
Agar like almost all scientists didn’t want his funding cut or even lose his job so he knew he had better be politically correct just. like those in the “environmental” sciences.
Imagine a tree trunk traversing upward through "500 million year" worth of strata. billions...millions...gazillion is their magic wand. It's the god that created from nothing. It makes nothing, a thing, and the impossible becomes possible.
Once again, an engineer/undergrad teaching a geology-ignorant audience about geology. Why can't you interview actual SME geologists with a PhD in actual geology? Why can't you provide actual peer-reviewed research in the field of geology?
We all have access to the consensus view...so if we want a naturalistically biased explanation, we know where to go and many of us were raised on those explanations in secular schooling.
You mean from people like Dr Kurt Wise and Dr Andrew Snelling? As you know if any paper rejects the evolutionists religion of millions of years it wont get past the gatekeepers and be published.
@@stuartwilliams3164 What do you think the peer review process actually is? Finding weaknesses in the research and disputing it is the entire point of the peer review process.
AronRa has a UA-cam channel with 8 scientific videos showing that the Flood could never have happened. No young Earth creationists have ever challenged it.
Actually bible means book so would that be a holy book lie? Check out a book from the 60's The Biblical Flood and Ice epoch. It answers your questions. Unless you prefer to wallow in willful ignorance. The two sides here have huge egos,y'all sound like partisan buttheads. Look at both sides and meet in the middle. You both will accomplish more if in fact you want the truth. But,you don't.
@BigRalphSmith So by being true to his beliefs even to the extent that he loses his standing amongst peers he is sacrificing his integrity? Perhaps you misunderstand the definition of "integrity"?
As a therapist working in home health in eastern kentucky. I had several miners that i worked with. One miner who was clear and coherent. Stated he encountered a 50+foot snake fossil compressed under coal seam.
I can also say when highway department went through coal seam. It was regular not in firm not wavy with changes in width
Miners are finding fossils regularly. Biggest find recently being that complete dinosaur over 65 million years old.
@@clarks58Forget the 65 million part. It's a scam.
@@clarks58 So the dinosaur existed millions of years before God created earth?
@@TearDownThisWall which god? There’s a few dozen to choose from,depending on your geographical location and century you were born. Lol
Being a native of WV, and being an underground coal miner. When I first started working in the mines, it didn't take long at all to see for myself. That the coal seams I have worked in, hadn't been there for "millions of years". My family has a long line of miners, and all of us have found some incredible fossils and artifacts encased in coal. Things that should not have been there, based on the "billions of years" theory.
Great production values. No crazy oblique camera shots that destroy the intimacy of the video. No banal 'hello everyone' openings, that distance the presenter from the viewer. Professional from beginning to end.
Shame that most of the actual content is wrong, manipulating, and misleading.
Or weird theatrical music that sensationalizes the material
@@StevenGreenGuz time to wake up.
Swamps have bowl shaped bottoms, but coal beds have horizontal bottoms.
Also roots, bugs and worms should be seen if it came from swamp/bog…..
Yes, absence of bioturbation (see 16:40) is a very noticeable problem for the slow-and-gradual idea of coal formation.
A large swamp's bottom should look flat, except for the edges. The coal-making material would collect on the large flat bottom and less on the edges. Then a lot piles upon the pre-coal material. Should make a horizontal bottom coal bed.
I used to work in the coal mines and we would often find fools gold shells in the coal.
Please explain how this is significant? I don’t understand it.
@@m0x910 Coal has a reductive effect on solubilized iron, turning it from Fe3+ to Fe2+. Fool's goal is FeS2 (pyrite) pointing to the overall redox environment in coal seams. The same effect coal has on other elements, especially uranium. Thus Uranium is trapped in coal as UO2 (uraninite). Uranium is radioactive, providing the neutrons to turn nitrogen (14 isotope) from coal into carbon14. SO, it provides the answer to this fake dilemma.
Here in the USA, a coal mine fire has been burning under Centralia, Pennsylvania since 1962. That shows just how vast the coal deposit is at that location.
For many generations my forefathers dug coal for a living from Scotland to America. I thank God for them and for Coal.
Bravo,CMI..
Just a quick mention. The heat that was required to cause coal formation would not have needed volcanic action to exist. Decaying vegetation can produce enough heat to cause spontaneous combustion… just ask a farmer what happens when hay that is too damp is baled-up…
Or cow dung it can go up to 60°C if done right you can run a coil through the chamber and water can be heated
The same thing happens with sawdust over time.
This is my favorite channel on the internet. Keep proving the truth!
There is very little truth here
@@klouis1886 you don't know truth (John 14:6)
@@RobertA-up9ur That will tell me how coal was formed?
@@klouis1886 that will tell you what truth is
@@RobertA-up9ur That didn't say a thing about coal
The biblical flood is obvious all over the Earth but that has atheists covering their ears and singing "La, la, la" as loud as they can.
That's funny because that's what Dawkins says about Young Earth Creationists like Dr Kurt Wise
@@hwd71 What?
@@hwd71 - Richard Dawkins has no credibility in my eyes. He ignores obvious evidence to maintain his godless worldview.
The flood is obvious - coal, oil fields, methane, continent-sized sedimentary rock layers, massive canyons - these things on every continent.
Indeed. Ex-naturalist, here. I had to ignore a lot to maintain that system of faith.
@@noneyabidness9644 - Isn't it wonderful when the light dawns in your mind and you realize what is reality and you can discard foolish paradigms?
He’s simply ignoring the fact that yes you DO find soil containing roots such as stigmaria under coal seams.
And your point is......?
He never said that roots were never found. He said the preserved tree trunks were found without them. There wasn't enough mass there to preserve them. You're arguing from a determined outcome.
I just listened to it. He said you do find some but most don't have roots. A tree without roots is dead. Yet evolution wants you to believe they have grown through many layers that they say took millions of years to form. And then became fossilized. That's nonsense you see dead trees rot and fall down long before it can fossilized and they have their roots in tact. Evolutionists want you to disbelieve what your own eyes see
Thanks for that, this channel it's amazing
It's woeful nonsense
I worked in a surface coal mine for 16 years and I remember finding petrified trees as deep as 250 ft below the ground while we were removing the coal.
In New Zealand at a Lime works where the lime is used for agriculture its been found that below the lime seams is coal that gives evidence of a flood depositing event
Uniformitarianism vs Catastrophism. Helping people see the two theories is a goal that is being accomplished by CMI.
I subscribe to both.
The Biblical Flood and Ice Epoch is a book that talks about it all.
Awesome EVIDENCE!!! Thank You!!!
Very good program very educational the gentleman is awesome 💯👍
Carbon-14 in coal is produced by radioactive decay of uranium-thorium isotope series that is naturally found in rocks (and which is found in varying concentrations in different rocks, hence the variation in carbon-14 content in different coals). It does not cause a problem zeroing instruments 0 is 0 and coal is not used as a reference.
Unfortunately people seem to skip your comment. Or just don’t understand it. Which is understandable considering the premise of this video.
Radioactive decay of uranium-thorium doesn't appear to produce the necessary variables for c-14 conversion. Where is this info coming from?
After some research it actually looks viable! It's funny that most science seems to believe carbon-14 cannot be created through alpha decay but I could see it, and I could even see their entire theory on how c-14 is created in the atmosphere being wrong. Alphas have the extra proton, which is ejected upon the creation of c-14.
That said, in the same rabbit hole I found a lot of issues; mainly that if small environmental effects like that can contaminate the dating methods, none can be trusted. If radioactive material can be created through multiple different avenues, then it can also be degraded. Throw enough energy at the earth and you could rapidly create or degrade anything.
This is literally a lie created to fool uneducated people. Carbon 14 is formed in the atmosphere by radiation interacting with nitrogen. There’s a chemical equation for this reaction! Perhaps you could show us the chemical equation for uranium-thorium yielding carbon isotopes 😂🤡
@@lucmatter9601his comment is not true, so maybe that’s why it gets ignored…
Excellent!
I've seen Dr Tas Walker's presentations in Church, and his arguments are rational and sound.
I love this Channel.
If you tell that Santa Claus fought Jesus Christ to a toddler he would believe the argument is true. You are the toddler for Walker.
@@ciprianpopa1503
Is English your third language?
Because that gibberish ..oh wait it was an example of how brain just chemically reacts to its own electrical impulses and taps out what brain tells it to tap out.
@@xtnese yeap English is my third communication language. That gibberish paints an exact picture of your state of mind and your level of understanding of science or any other serious topic for that matter. Your "humor", if one can call humor those non sense words listed above, is so dry that it makes Sahara look like the deepest ocean.
@@xtnese BTW why don't you propose this Dr. if you love him? He can tell you stories and you can sleep ok ever after. You can also try sex, if you can manage to stay awake.
@@ciprianpopa1503
Why dont you go practice nikah mutah with 1000 shia
I note that the site requires us not to add external links. This is a shame because I can find several articles that de bunk this UA-cam post.
Well then just post the name of the study and not the actual links. I have had this same problem multiple times. If somebody was truly interested all they would have to do is Google the name of the papers. It works most of the time.
Bible fundamentalists get extremely upset when their claims are debunked.
Dr. Walker, you didn't mention C14 in coal. I would expect to see C14 in every coal seam and that that would be the strongest argument against great age if C14 were in the atmosphere at the time of the Flood. So is C14 ubiquitous in coal? If not then I would conclude that high energy cosmic rays were not prevalent before the Flood.
From our article, 'How carbon dating works' ( creation.com/how-carbon-dating-works )
"Carbon dating has also been applied to coal, from ‘20-million-year-old’ Miocene coal to ‘300-million-year-old’ Pennsylvanian coal. Every coal sample contained carbon-14. They even contained approximately the same amount of carbon-14. There is no way to physically contaminate all the coal in the world with carbon-14. The evidence is that coal is young, because there should not be any carbon-14 left in anything that that is claimed to be millions of years in age."
@@creationministriesintl Thanks! From reading Dr. Carter's article I'm going to assume that most coal samples which have ever been tested have measurable C14. And if that's the case then no other arguments are needed to prove a "young" Earth. The entire Old Earth argument collapses. End of discussion.
@@douglindauer7327 No. They will maintain their belief in the old earth based on faith, not science.
A great example of starting with the conclusion and searching for the answer
@@StudentDad-mc3pu Starting with C14 in coal is NOT "starting with the conclusion"! It's starting with a fact.
Evolution. Literally impossible.
@@83BongoChemistry disproves evolution.
Evolution is not only possible, but it's factually correct.
Agree; it contradicts causality (*ie "chemical evolution"); therefore logically impossible; therefore scientifically impossible.
@@thepeaksandthetroughs Oh really? What's your top 2 facts that prove it correct and why? I'll wait....
@@thepeaksandthetroughs Really? What part of so-called "evolution" is a fact according to observational science? If you are referring to things adapting over time, such as dogs becoming other kinds of dogs, this is called speciation, which, yes, is verified by observational science; however, if you mean "chemical evolution" (*molecules to man) or if you mean, animals "evolving" into Humans over time; those ideas are simply not supported by observational science (* instead those ideas are modern mythology and philosophy tied to a kind of forensic science).
How do you get a 50-foot-thick coal seam. Vegetation would have to have been 150 or more thick to produce it
Whats the problem?
@@klouis1886 His was an attempt at "proof from incredulity"
It always works so well!
If Darwin put his theories out for public consumption today, he would be a laughing stock.
Er ... they are out for public consumption and the vast majority of science accepts them.
@@StudentDad-mc3pu only because they were drilled into their heads since birth. In my opinion.
Modern physics doesn't accept Newton's laws of gravity.. it was refined and reviewed.
Maybe apologists should stop pulling a dead horse and pick up a science book written in this century.
The real laughing stock are those who bring the literal 6 days creation stories to the public today.. and people actually do that today.
@@StudentDad-mc3pu darwin was a known mason , they reject evolution and believe the athiest to be a fool , hes a liar by trade..........which is what is so insulting to you guys listening to such nonsense , they are intentional lies from someone who believes nothing he spoke , as per free mason requirements
@@StudentDad-mc3pu Why then is not every geological formation and every stratum full of such intermediate links? Geology assuredly does not reveal any such finely graduated organic chain; and this, perhaps, is the most obvious and gravest objection which can be urged against my theory. ~ Charles Darwin 😂
Thanks CMI for being faithful to his word
So faithful to an incorrect interpretation of The Bible whilst ignoring actual facts. This is NOT science.
So...? How do the multiple layers or "seams" of coal with hundreds of ft. between them, fit into this theoretical explanation? On the 5 seam i found immaculate preservations of fern, thorn branches, tree branches; on the 6 seam roughly 100ft higher in the rock strata (closer to the surface on top of the 5 seam) i only find sea shells, shark teeth, and sand dollars. The Mt. Saint Helens model( a singular event) does support rapid formation but for only one seam;and still presents issues with the log mats; not all seams present in our geology which raises questions more so than provides answers.
Have you ever stopped to think that different layers could have been caused by different catastrophic events that cause local flooding in certain areas. There is one seam of coal worldwide, that suggests a worldwide flood but all the other seams of coal are local. There have been numerous volcanic explosions/incidents and also various tsunamis and other disasters that could have formed these regional seams.
I came to this conclusion even before Mt St Helen. It makes so much sense.
Sure, but can you find your butt cheeks on the map?
Can you demonstrate this in an organized laboratory (outdoor) experiment?
If you study the geology in the Gulf Of Mexico, of which I have had the opportunity to see firsthand, having worked very many drilling operations, and recorded the lithology, you would
find that there is a massive alluvial bed of Shell Fragments, a couple 100 feet thick at about 1/4-1/2 mile beneath the sea bottom reaching out about 100+ miles into, and across the Gulf.
This would indicate a massive outflow from the Mississippi River Basin area, and across the Gulf Coast, into the Gulf during the global flood.
What you said was fine until you added the 'global flood' nonsense. The deposit you described is clearly made up of thousands of generations of animals. Chalk deposits, which are far older, need even more animals to have died.
Or, during a non-global more local flood.
@@guillermoa.nerygomez8782a local flood producing a 100 foot thick layer of shells? LOL.. a local flood wouldn't even produce a one inch thick layer of shells over any area.
@@michaelyork4554 Not talking about a small flood, mind you, it could be a massive one, just not worldwide. Such events have been found to occur as glacial eras ended and glacial lakes suddenly broke their dams.
But another option is that the area was not quite ocean at some point in the past, rather the vicinity of a river delta, and stayed so for enough years as to develop that deposit.
I believe the super high volcanic mountains we see today were created during the flood. Think about it logically. The 'fountains of the deep' opened up and massive volcanic activity was happening at the same time, the rapidly cooling lava would have stacked in one spot and made an underwater mound which, with continued volcanic activity would have made the mound 'snowball' and get bigger and bigger and form an underwater mountain which would have been exposed when the water receded, leaving a mountain. The slow collision of continents doesn't seem enough to create such high mountain ranges. Not to mention, most volcanic mountains, when erupting out of water do not get taller, maybe thicker and more rounded but not taller. They actually fragment and break apart and sometimes even explode like Mt. Saint Helens, leaving the remaining mountain much smaller. The only way such huge mountains could be formed quickly in my opinion, is to be from immense volcanic activity during a time of water covering the earth. I'm not a geologist or a vulcanologist so I cannot say it's a 100% certainty but it seems more consistent with the young earth/rapid formation timeline.
@@kevinrussell1144 That's the thing, I don't need an IF. I've got the details in the Bible. It explains everything. Even things that science can't explain yet. I KNOW it's true. Not because of any empirical evidence, but because the Lord has changed my life so drastically for the better and I see His works everyday, not just in my life but in those around me. More and more evidence of Biblical events is being found everyday and scientists still can't figure out how evolution could even start because the cell parts needed for division and eventual merging are not able to be made before the cell decays and dies. Life cannot come from non life and something cannot come from nothing, it's impossible and unobservable, therefore scientifically impossible to replicate or even observe. As far as geology, there is way more evidence for a young earth and a global flood than there is of anything else, even in core samples. Layers that science says were laid down over thousands of years have no sign of biological growth in between, which would have occurred between the layers if they were laid down over a long period. It's more likely that they were laid down quickly all at once which would explain the lack of biological material between the layers. There are many other examples of inconsistencies in scientific explanation, like how rock layers can be bent without breaking if they were laid down over long periods of time, more likely mud was laid down and bent while still soft, then turned into sedimentary stone after being bent. Anyways, I don't want to 'convince' you of anything, you have to come to faith on your own terms, if at all. I really pray that you do, it's so freeing and opens up a whole new world and takes the 'glasses' off and let's you see the world the way it truly is. Maybe check out the Institute For Creation Research channel and you will see many videos of geological, biological and even cosmic evidence that will change the way you see things for the better. Stay safe.
@@kevinrussell1144 As far as something coming from nothing, I should have clarified. Life cannot come from non-life, a living cell cannot come from a non living primordial pool of goo or whatever else science tries to say happened in the beginning. Even scientists in a laboratory with expensive high tech equipment cannot make a living cell, complete with programming, from non living components. They can replicate cells using other cells that were already alive but they cannot replicate anything like they claim happened to start life. No matter how many non living items you put into an area, no matter how many lightning strikes, no matter the heat level, life cannot come from non life. Nothing ever observed has created life from non life. Nothing attempted has been able to produce results even close to what is needed for life to pop out of nowhere. Anyway, like I said, you probably don't want the truth or even watch these videos, just come to flaunt your expertise and argue with comments. This is the last comment I'll make because trying to convince anyone of anything is futile, especially when they are embedded with a worldview which filters all their information to fit their embedded beliefs. Good bye, Peace out, stay safe.
The same good fortune to you, friend. You can think what you want about my motives, but like you, I'm simply trying to figure out the truth of things. Yes, stay safe. I fear we're all in for tough times ahead.@@ichitoburrito1359
Nothing in your post is true
Stay safe.
You are allowed to question my motives and dismiss me just as much as we're all encouraged to question the motives and good intentions of the Drug Cartels, Joe, or Trump.
Like you, I'm trying to discover the truth to the best of my understanding.
And yeah, it's tough for anyone to change someone else's mind about anything, let alone change his own views.@@ichitoburrito1359
There was a Sumerian metal bell found in a coal seam in the USA. Associates for Biblical Research and Institute for Creation Research. Have shown so much excellent research. Their research is pretty technical and many decades long now. I love their programs and publications
Sumer was the first civilization after the flood, so if the bell was in coal it must have been from a pre-flood civilization.
No there was not, this is utterly fake.
Does that artifact disturb your world view, @@StudentDad-mc3pu?
We have never found human remains or objects in any coal seams
I have seen pictures of a hammer and a doll in coal
@@iaindcosta Those were proven fake years ago
@@klouis1886 were they, how?
By whom?
@iaindcosta The hammer is identical with late 19th-century mining hammers and the most likely explanation is that it was encased in a deposit of highly-soluble travertine within a relatively short time.
@klouis1886 ..I can accept that as a good possibility, rocks and deposits can form quickly, maybe coal too?
Diamonds don't take as long to form as they told us when I was a lad..
A lot of what I was taught as a lad has turned out to be false.
Please explain the existence of lead.
Great video, coal is fast fossilized tree bark, not a single fiber of tree trunk.
At the flood the waves uprooted the trees and they formed monstrous rafts like on Spirit Lake Washington.
Spirit lake coal was fully formed in one week.
God bless you for those great informations
do we find microscopic marine fossils in coal seams? if the great flood deposited these seams of trees and vegetation, shouldn't we find fossilized plankton for example, and what not, in coal? And within the sand stones above and below the coal seams?
only if it was rising sea levels
😂 yes evolution is so such a crazy concept and I thought this as a child and I always wondered why hasn’t anything ever evolved into something new or better…? Only thing I see happening is things dyeing off
@@83Bongotime- your magical wand
@@83Bongo"things do evolve" by losing information but never by adding new information.
RAPID speciation is actually an important part of the biblical creation model (e.g. see creation.com/speciation-is-not-evolution and creation.com/speedy-species-surprise ). But speciation within a kind (e.g. 'family')-usually as a result of natural selection-is NOT evolution. (See creation.com/natural-selection-evolution ) SELECTING genetic traits is very different from CREATING brand new ones, and that is where evolution has huge problems. (And mutation isn't up to the job. See creation.com/mutations-and-information )
@83Bongo mutation is not evolution... even the PhDs will admit they've only ever observed 'micro-evolution' ... on top of that the idea of a simple/single cell organism A) is a misnomer and B) has to have somehow generated itself? ... the idea of evolution in virtually all of the sciences is forced. The evidence just doesn't support it.
@@stanley6700 Why would information need to be added?
I found Coal in a building in the attic where wood in the rafters turned to coal
I read that inspection teams found them on wooden bridges for trains in the US. They had been there for a hundred years or so.
🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣
That would be charcoal not coal.
How is charCOAL chemically different from coal?
@@freebanking coal is formed when materials containing carbon decay under pressure. It contains rock and other sediment plus many volatile chemical compounds. Charcoal is formed when materials containing carbon are heated/burned until all of the volatile chemical compounds are burned off. Charcoal does not have to be under pressure to form. Charcoal is often used for outdoor grilling.
Where did all the extra water go?
Into the ocean trenches and into space as the mountains rose up.
creation.com/how-did-the-waters-of-noahs-flood-drain
Here you go!
Under the mantel aquafer there are oceans of water under our feet
Understanding Dr John Baumgardner"s theory of Catastrophic Plate Tectonics is critical to understanding how global flood occurred.
@@haggismcbaggis9485
I see folded mountains and think all those layers had to be soft at the same time when they were bent without breaking at the folds.
I
@@haggismcbaggis9485
I used to live by the Ouachita mountains in Arkansas.
No metamorphosis at the folds. Sandstone, mudstone and limestone only.
The documentary "Is Genesis History Mountains after the Flood"
details the folded strata at the Kaibab upwarp in the Grand Canyon showing no metamorphosis at the folds.
Think about it.
We only witness earthquakes at fault lines today. Rigid rock under tension creating earthquakes, not bending
@@haggismcbaggis9485
The more you research this topic, the more a single catastrophic global flood answers many anomalies that uniformitarianistism can't answer.
You will begin to see the assumptions needed to believe old age rocks
Peter predicted we would believe uniformarionism in the end times.
A casual google search for man-made items found in coal says a lot, I found one video of 20 items found in coal, and the coal was of course dated to many tens of millions of years old, with the items in the coal. but there are those so convinced that they will hatch all kinds of conspiracy theories to explain away such items, if you follow much of this at all the number of times they have to resort to made up stories about such things is amazing in and of itself, that does not mean what you think it means here let me explain what that really means, over and over and over ad nauseum, countless dragon legends around the world, just about every culture has a flood story, the Ica stones, Acámbaro figures, Indian pictographs, the evidence is there but people would rather cling to evolution and therefore explain away the evidence anyway they can or try to discredit the evidence anyway they can.
Its just like Mary Schweitzer,
4:50
I had One reviewer tell me that he
4:52
didn't care what the data said he knew
4:55
that what I was Finding wasn't possible
4:57
says Schweitzer I wrote back and said
5:00
well what data would convince you and he
5:02
said
5:04
none
This has nothing to do cold hard factual evidence, but a predisposition that they will not have anything that will point to a young earth and the Creator of it.
"Sciences alternative to an Intelligent Creator: The Multiverse Theory," Discover Magazine December 2008.
"If there is only one universe you might have to have a Fine-tuner, "If you don't want God, you'd better have a multiverse”
And there it is in a nutshell, they do not want God, so any other explanation is preferable than to accept God.
Any old story no matter how implausible or farfetched is better than The Biblical God for them.
Excellent.
*_Eph _**_4:14_**_ That we henceforth be no more children, tossed to and fro, and carried about with every wind of doctrine, by the sleight of men, and cunning craftiness, whereby they lie in wait to deceive;_* *_- KJB_*
I believe coal being at various levels proves evolution. As we know the Earth has been through numerous extinction events. The latest one being approximately 12,000 years ago. It’s kinda odd that so many civilizations forgot to drown and left writings and artifacts that young earthers tell us was the time of Noah’s flood.
Hi
They didn’t forget to drown THEY ARE THE DESCENDENTS OF THE EIGHT THAT WERE ON NOAH’S ARK! The ‘Table of nations’ as it is described in Genesis!
The flood would have consisted of multiple tsunamis going in and out as the land was raising or falling. This could easily explain why different layers contain fossils from different areas or biomes.
The geological violence also explains the lack of human fossils.
This week I've had a discussion on a geology FB group I'm on regarding the Capital Reef National Park Cathedral Valley, in the US...rapid deposition of sediments. Had the usual keyboard warrior abuse and dismissal, but one guy calmed down so was able to rationally engage with him for couple of exchanges. It wasn't coal we were addressing, rather the beautiful layering evident in the 'cathedrals'.
Interesting to hear you Tas, mention the possibility of continent/ocean reversal during the Flood. This makes more sense to me than catastrophic plate tectonics. The preflood continents scoured down, and all the material that made them up, being washed into the preflood ocean basins. The trajectory of water flow and sedimentation is downhill, so eroded material on continents went downhill out into the oceans where tens of thousands of metres of sediment built up before being uplifted to form present day continents.
Another memorial for Noah’s Flood is the Moon, Earth rock was discovered peppered all over the Moon side that faces the Earth. Our atmosphere was much closer before that historic day. Also the backside of the Moon is much smoother but is peppered with meteorite impacts. What a protection God has provided for us.
You are absolutely wrong
@@klouis1886 of course denial is to be expected🥱
@@Vetforlife There is no evidence for your ideas
@@klouis1886 Not saying that it's true that Earth rock has been "peppered" all over the moon, but we have found at least one rock that seems to have terrestrial origin: solarsystem.nasa.gov/news/820/earths-oldest-rock-found-on-the-moon/
@SheridanFalkenberry One of the surprises from moon rocks was how similar to Earth rocks. In fact Mars rock appear similar to Earth rocks
Whatever floats your boat/ark
tree sap is probably all different the evergreen the non evergreen some sap is blood red from the dragon tree this stuff turns to different things according to the marble and granite that were different kinds trees
i drink maple tree juice syrup blood refined
I wonder what Noah and his family were thinking as all of the people that they had ever known died in Judgement.
Horrific.
well, since there was never a time on earth such a flood happened, the subject is sort of moot, isnt it?
@@tdog2284 No, actually he meant Moor boats. The Moors had boats also
@@archimedesmaid3602 How do you explain whales in the southwest United States, clams on Mt. Everest, and shark's teeth buried in the Midwest?
00:01... A memorial to Noah's flood?! Wouldn't that be, the Rainbow? (I get it tho...)^^
\O>
I heard that China doesn’t have coal or petroleum resources. What does this worldview say about this fact and why it’s not there.
@@rclose23 it does have deposits. First Google search results show 143 billion tonnes of coal and 25 billion barrels of oil. I'm pretty sure there's a story every several years of an accident in their coal mines.
Is your proposal as to the basis of the flood as described in the Bible - rain for 40 days and 40 nights?
Some other commentators seem to be moving towards an alternative theory such as a meteor impact?
The Bible also says that there was violent volcanic activity and upheaval of the ocean floors. It wasn't just a bunch of rain. It changed the geology of the earth completely.
Excellent video (as usual)!
some here do not know there difference between coal and charcoal.
Just curious, why are there so many young earth creationists from Australia.
Because we're a sceptical bunch in Australia, the media and schools system when I was growing up was always shoving evolution down our throats.
I became a YEC not long after my conversion when the Lord led me to Answers In Genesis.
I finally found the alternative explanations to explain the data in the YEC model rather than evolution.
Fortunately for Australia, Ken Ham left those shores to spread his brand of BS in the US
Coal only forms with the right pressure the higher you find diamonds etc
Diamonds don't form from coal. They form from graphite in a volcanic throat called Kimberlite.
People are so caught up in young/old earth that they are missing very important biblical lessons that are relevant in our lives. Whether it's young or old doesn't matter when it comes to learning about God and learning valuable lessons about our sinful nature and other human characteristics.
The age of coal does not affect anything when it comes biblical inspiration and lessons. It's like this....In the movie Mr. Mom with Michael Keaton, he is trying to tell some co-workers a story to inspire them, but they are so caught up in the details that they destroy that actual lesson Keaton is trying to teach them.
@@smarterworkout uhh I do believe God is causing all this proof to come out…I do believe it’s part of His plan to debunk the darkness, just as he says to “expose the darkness” that’s one of the missions He has entrusted us with. When you’re a baby Christian you might only think of developing personal character but a mature one will be able to balance more responsibilities.
Hi
The established geological faculty seems to have no trouble ascribing uniformatism to geological processes but baulks at the idea that CATASTROPHES CAN BE EQUALLY WORLD WIDE !😮
This was truly informative. I had to agree with the scientist that Cole truly does prove the flood! Praise the Lord Jesus Christ hallelujah! And another thing that proves the flood, the rainbow God said he put the bow in the sky as a remembrance. Hallelujah!
Great video! Thanks!
I just wanted to comment that I found the topic of the Flood very informative because most all of use have a idea of what the flood means yet so not understand what exactly took place and the evidence to put it into perspective.
And lets talk about the oil, i believe the earth renews oil everyday, it would be impossible for our planet to run out of oil, am i right ?
I praying for my pastor who is having a hard time with schooling opinions.
Could we pray for hi
And them to have Science becoming a puzzle of god and how going IMRAD I
Is not persuasive
God bless
I don't think it's a young earth I just think the last catastrophe was what we call Noah.
I just think that the previous ones were not needed in our biblical account or necessary for our understanding. Trim the fat and pass down the relevant.
I actually believe we have been around way way longer than science wants to credit us for and I believe the earth is older than what science wants to believe.
Time is a very incredibly resilient force and we know it changes!
Love it. God’s Word is absolutely 💯% accurate, praise God. Thank you for this ministry, so, so interesting. So the coal we are using and burning today was the vegetation on the earth prior to Noah’s flood, Wow.
So why was the flood really created/happen was it so we could have cool for power or because God was angry at the people at that time ?
I serve the God of Creation, through his Only Begotten Son, the Lord Jesus Christ! The God of Creation knew what he was doing when he caused Noah's Flood, the proof is undeniable. I enjoyed this interview, thankyou so much Creation Ministries International, and thank you to a good Host! Blessings from David, on Vancouver Island, B.C., Canada
Thank you CMI
there were no loathesome swamp in the pre flood world
I am a Christian so I am on your side and truly believe God created the universe and the earth. I am a physician and An amateur astronomer with an interest in physics. While I agree with your discussions on the formation of coal. Formation of carbon on the other hand is a different story. Carbon and more complex elements from what we know can only be formed by nuclear fusion in stars. So the coal that was on the earth must have come from a dead star. I do not know whether stars are young or old but I think they probably have to be older than 6000 years unless God had a different mechanism for their formation. If they are only thousands of years old then we should see them being formed fairly regularly throughout the universe and Galaxy. But we do not. I truly believe God created all this but I do not know how. However this should not be the hill you should die on in terms of believing in God and Jesus Christ. The most important thing to know is that he died for our sins and rose from the dead so we know that what he said was true
Christ and His Church taught me Sacred Scripture.
The Church taught Christ and the Resurrection and Christ taught Noah's Flood.
I agree that coal is a clear memorial to the Great Flood. It's carbonized trees and other plants. You can see the growth rings on many chunks of coal
It's not made of trees.
Minus the fact that there is zero proof of a great flood
Welcome to the year 5784.
After the creation? After the flood? After Hrcpa the dinosaur’s end?
This is awesome! I just recently started commenting on UA-cam about this realization a few months ago! You should also include the incredible coincidence that coal was a recent discovery in China when it started washing up on their beaches! If coal was older then we would have discovered it a long time ago!
I believe what he is saying!
Excellent. Very well described.
Coal is from burnt trees.
Long time ago!
This is not a problem for science or for the Bible. It is a problem on how religious leaders interpret the Bible....very much the same as the Vatican hanging Galileo for claiming the Earth is not the center of the universe.
Why do we not find fossils in coal like squirrels?
Oh and supplementary question please? Can we not use dendrochronology to confirm the date of the flood?
Sorry to bother you, you probably get asked these questions all the time.
More UTTER NONSENSE and impossible explanations. You simply could not have had enough vegetation on the surface to have formed the coal seems we see today - it took generations of plants over hundreds of years, if not thousands to form the deep peat bogs and swamps that eventually formed coal. Chalk is the same, as is lime stone.
This proves that some scientists are just jokers. To forget that it takes millions of years for the dead vegetation to reach those high temperatures, because that only happens in the deep layers of the earth and where the pressure is high enough. Coal found on the surface, is even older.The geological movement of the earth's layers due to tectonics pushes the aerth layers up. This is how mountains form and ancient layers are exposed
Wood. Water. Vegetation. Wood. Pressure vessel. heat. Your explanation makes no sense. That much different heat and different pressure to form different coal makes no sense. Look up people that do research like that for a living to find if this makes sense. Answer. Not in timeline of a few thousand yrs.
Pretty certain that this is where oil came from.
It's all metamorphosis
If all vegetation and seeds were destroyed by the Flood, explain how grass and trees were able to regrow in time enough for all the herbivores released from the ark to survive?
seeds were not destroyed by the flood. seeds are very resilient
See point 9 here: creation.com/fish-plants-survive-genesis-flood
Some maybe, but how long do they take to germinate and grow to a sufficient size to be useful and where was the soil for them to grow? How many of the selected animals did the carnivores kill? Without a second creation miracle it just doesn't add up!
@@laurencesmith8899 A more detailed look at this objection: creation.com/feeding-carnivores-on-the-ark-and-refuting-an-accusation-of-closet-scientism
@@laurencesmith8899whole earth was not flooded for long at all, maybe few days before it started to recede and dry land appear, no problem there
Agar like almost all scientists didn’t want his funding cut or even lose his job so he knew he had better be politically correct just. like those in the “environmental” sciences.
Imagine a tree trunk traversing upward through "500 million year" worth of strata. billions...millions...gazillion is their magic wand. It's the god that created from nothing. It makes nothing, a thing, and the impossible becomes possible.
Great, great, great!!!! Thank you.
How to save a dying tree [of life].
Water it or replant it [restart, reset].
God already watered it!!
Once again, an engineer/undergrad teaching a geology-ignorant audience about geology.
Why can't you interview actual SME geologists with a PhD in actual geology?
Why can't you provide actual peer-reviewed research in the field of geology?
We all have access to the consensus view...so if we want a naturalistically biased explanation, we know where to go and many of us were raised on those explanations in secular schooling.
You mean from people like Dr Kurt Wise and Dr Andrew Snelling?
As you know if any paper rejects the evolutionists religion of millions of years it wont get past the gatekeepers and be published.
Peers refuse to read what they dispute!!!
@@stuartwilliams3164 What do you think the peer review process actually is? Finding weaknesses in the research and disputing it is the entire point of the peer review process.
All things seen and unseen were created by the Word of God. Coal was spoken into existence.
Yahusha HaMashiach
AronRa has a UA-cam channel with 8 scientific videos showing that the Flood could never have happened.
No young Earth creationists have ever challenged it.
Who cares
@@mitchhobock683 Intelligent people who are smart enough to not believe in fairytales?
Don’t worry, that doesn’t include you.
How about diamonds? It takes a diamond over a billion years to form!
Not true, they make diamonds in labs all the time. It takes immense heat and pressure but the time period is debatable.
The diamonds found in earth, are a lot different than the diamonds that are made by men
@@stephen6621 Snowflakes made by men are different than natural snowflakes, yet they are each made instantaneously. Your point is?
@@stephen6621 Snowflakes made by men are different than natural snowflakes, yet they are both made instantaneously. Your point is?
@@stephen6621 Snowflakes made by nature are different than man made, yet they are both made instantaneously.
A single year of flood could not have created the vast coal beds of today.
Another biblical lie.
Actually bible means book so would that be a holy book lie?
Check out a book from the 60's
The Biblical Flood and Ice epoch.
It answers your questions.
Unless you prefer to wallow in willful ignorance.
The two sides here have huge egos,y'all sound like partisan buttheads.
Look at both sides and meet in the middle. You both will accomplish more if in fact you want the truth.
But,you don't.
I do wonder why people of faith need proof all the time?
Very odd.
Tides! The earth captured ,temporarily,an object back in the day. It raised huge tides affecting water,earth and magma.
People forget the Darwin's 'Theory' of evolution is just that.....A THEORY! It is not fact. Theory does not mean fact and never has.
in science a theory is not a hypothesis , you need to understand the difference ...
@@LyndseyWard-o4s theory doesn't mean fact.
Theory has never meant fact!
Immanuel Velikovsky
Find me one geologist who is not a creationist that agrees with Walker's ideas. Just one.
If he is not a creationist how can he agree with his idea? 😂
@@AlexChan-k2t Exactly. Walker sacrificed his credentials and his integrity on the alter of religion.
you mean he sacrificed his reputation for the sake of integrity
@@iaindcosta _"you mean he sacrificed his reputation for the sake of integrity"_
No, I meant exactly what I said.
@BigRalphSmith So by being true to his beliefs even to the extent that he loses his standing amongst peers he is sacrificing his integrity?
Perhaps you misunderstand the definition of "integrity"?