Thanks, this is a JAVS video which we don't normally blur because of the low quality resulting in sufficient pixelation. We blurred other portions because the camera was close enough but the camera is way too far back in that shot so we don't bother (which is standard policy). The eyes, nose, ears, and mouth, are not sufficiently defined for a stranger to ID.
You can keep up to date with our coverage schedule here: ournevadajudges.com/media/events?state=%7B%22show_case%22:%2289,642%22%7D
15:13 i don’t believe a hotel would tell an employee the day of their shift time or they don’t need to come in. I don’t believe her.
The child should NOT be there and I'm really disappointed that the judge allowed it. I can't stand parents who expose their kids to custody disputes.
That child should not be there for this adult conversation.
Just my thoughts
@ournevadajudges
The child’s face is not blurred at 26:13, you may want to correct that
Thanks, this is a JAVS video which we don't normally blur because of the low quality resulting in sufficient pixelation. We blurred other portions because the camera was close enough but the camera is way too far back in that shot so we don't bother (which is standard policy). The eyes, nose, ears, and mouth, are not sufficiently defined for a stranger to ID.
Why on earth is this child in court? Absurd