Many thanks for viewing and for the comment. One thing to be aware of, is that the loops that allow the hooks for the front panel to fastening into (at about 4m 30s), are not that well attached to the main body of the bag. One of the loops on my bag has eventually come away from the stitching. You need to be careful not to pull too tightly when tightening the straps.
@@MarkLindstrom Thanks for the heads up! I must admit, I'm not that impressed with the material they have used, especially considering quality of everything else. I did think about your suggestion of using standard webbing clips. Now, I settled on the 45D for various reasons, so yours may be different, but my guess is they went with the hook types because the gap when the flap is stowed is too small, and it would have left it a bit loose and, well, flappy. I would have gone for the 51D as I liked the extra depth and width, plus the larger side access flap(I sometimes use a battery grip). However, the top and bottom compartments on the 45D are so well sealed off that I can't imagine even a paper clip could find its way into the wrong place. That's important for me as I'm using the bag to carry other things, non camera related, for overnight camping. I'm now looking for some suitable side pouches, much like the Bergen ones the army use, so that I can up my capacity. Anyway. Really good review of an excellent series of bags. It's so useful to see other peoples loadouts before pulling the trigger. In the spirit of this I will share mine! The bottom compartment on my 45D can take: Canon EF 24-105mm f/4 L IS USM (with hood in ready to go position) Canon EF 16-35mm f/2.8 L USM (with hood in ready to go position) Canon EF 100mm f/2.8 Macro USM (no hood) I also have a Canon EF 85mm f/1.8 USM which is much smaller, so either lives on the camera, or swaps out with the above. Any of these lenses will fit in the side compartment on my 5DIII with the hood in place. I've also got a speedlight in that center section and a few bits and bobs including batteries and charger. There is some space free, but these bags do not have any baggy pockets, so anything thicker than a lens cap has to go in a padded section, or loose in the top compartment. Bit of a waste of space that so I'm probably going to attach some small pouches somehow. I hope that helps someone out, and thanks again for an excellent review. As a small time creator myself I am well aware of how much effort goes into these things. Anyway, I watched a couple more of your videos so I've clicked subscribe. Best of luck. Fox.
Nice reviews, Very Informative. One request, please review Gitzo adventury 45L backpack. There are not many reviews and I wish to have your detailed opinion on it. It would be great if you could review it
Many thanks Abhijnan for viewing and for your suggestion. Unfortunately, not being one of the UA-cam elite that get kit sent to them, I currently only review items that I've personally purchased. And whilst the Gitzo Adventury bags look very interesting, and have a few features that interest me, having recently bought a Shimoda (which I have reviewed), I'm not actually in the market for another bag. Looking at some of the reviews available it appears that the Adventury 45 shares many features of the Shimoda, but adds the availability of Molle attachment points and a pouch on the waist belt. It also includes the camera storage unit, which has to be bought separately for the Shimoda; thus increasing the cost of that bag. But with the Shimoda you have the option to use different camera inserts and can make more adjustments to the carry straps, and even replace them. Good luck in your search.
Nice review. I would like to point out the little thing you said you use to loosen the blades is what is used to tighten/untighten the lens on the phantom. Speaking of which, the proper way to carry your phantom on the outside is to turn the lens upward, and have the landing gear outward. This will solve your issue with the rain cover keeping the cover from covering properly. Cheers!
I hate these zip pockets which are located against a screen or other sensitive parts of camera!! There must be no hard elements which may touch those areas. Otherwise - great bag. 53 is better in this regard imho.
Hi Mark thanks for you very detailed review, but i don't think this bag will do for me i need something to carry my drone Mavic pro camera gear and my tent as i like to walk into the mountains for my photography. i will keep looking good luck with your channel
That neoprene pocket on the side of the bag where you had the small tripod attached is actually for you to slip two of the tripod legs into so the tripod does not flail around...give it a try. Slip the two legs through the band/strap part and into the neoprene pockets.
Hi. You're correct saying that the neoprene pocket can be used to slip two legs of a tripod into it in order to provide more stability, but it depends on the size and type of tripod as to how effective this is. For the types of tripod where the legs fold back on themselves for storage, such as the 3 Legged Thing, shown in the video, you cannot get two legs into the neoprene pocket, or even through the strap, in its normal storage mode due to the centre column being in the way. Obviously you can fold the legs the other way around (as if ready for use) which allows you to slide two legs in. However, dependent on the size of the tripod, it can potentially sit a little high above the top of the bag using this method. My other tripod, for example, that was shown being carried in the front carry straps in the video, is far too large to carry on the side of the bag with the legs resting in the neoprene pocket. But it can be carried with two legs slotted through the strap, and left to hang loose at the bottom. It is more secure than just slotting one leg through the strap. Many thanks for pointing this out; I had identified it prior to the video but forget to mention it.
Thank you Mark for the outstanding/detailed reply, and your video was pretty thorough. I just took this bag off my "buy & try" list thanks to your practical tip. My comment was based solely on what the manufacturer claimed in a product demo, but obviously what they claim it is meant to do and real life practicality do not always coincide. Even though my carbon fiber tripod is only 19 inches folded, it usually carries a heavier fluid video head/leveling base on top which makes it top heavy and unwieldy if not secured to a bag properly. I have a tactical style camelbak motherlode bag with molle attachment points that has worked out the best for me out of all the bags I've tried so far but it's a heavy bastard even before you add equipment due to its 1000 Denier Cordura genetics. I also like using bags that are covert and don't scream expensive equipment inside. My hunt for the "near perfect" camera carry system continues........
Ah the search for the perfect bag, or even near perfect bag, I too continue in this quest; I think it will be photographer's Holy Grail!! Many thanks for your comments. Whether the following will help you or not, but I have had another go with my big tripod, which also has 19 inch legs when retracted (20" including the spikes). As I stated before, you can put two of the legs through the strap bit and let the tripod then slide down loosely. In this configuration the legs hang @ 5 inches below the bottom of the bag. I have a Manfrotto 327RC2 head on this tripod, which is also a bit unwieldy, but I have noticed that there is a loop at the bottom of the bag beneath the Neoprene pocket, through which you can thread a bungie cord (or something similar) to secure the base of the tripod. I haven't tried this out walking yet, only around the house, but it seems to keep the tripod reasonably steady. Whilst some of my comments about the bag have been a little negative, I would say that it is a very comfortable bag to carry. My other rucksack bag is an F-Stop Loki, and I actually find the Vanguard more comfortable; the straps are broader and more padded and my back doesn't sweat as much. Good luck in your search.
The neoprene pocket in the side can also be used for the tripod to make it more secure. Great review though. I'm hoping to get one when I get a drone, so I can carry my dslr too.
Hi Will. Thanks for viewing and commenting. You're correct, the neoprene pocket can be used to make the tripod more secure, but it all depends on the type of tripod and size, as to how much impact it has. For the types of tripod where the legs fold back over the centre column when closed, such as the 3 Legged Thing I show in the video, it is only possible to get one leg into the sleeve, or even through the loop above it. For a more traditional tripod, two legs can be put into the pocket, but the pocket is only @23 cm or 9 inches deep, so if you have a largish tripod, it will stick up quite high. It's a shame that the loop that is above the neoprene pocket wasn't an adjustable strap; it would then be possible to fasten a tripod more securely. However, if I need to fasten it more securely I will use the front fastening method.
Thanks for your reply. With such a diverse range of equipment, I guess it's hard for companies to make a one size fits all model, especially when trying to fit a drone in with camera gear. Those backwards folding tripods do look neat, and would be useful when flying as it could fit in a medium sized suitcase. I guess I will have to find a store that stocks them to ensure my gear fits. Many thanks for your in depth review though..
Thanks for a great review. Very usefull, especially the part where you stated your height as a scale of the bag size. Its been 2 years now, how is the drone? Does it have problems after being carried around in a bag?? I have a phantom 4 pro and still use the hardcase that came with it.
Hi Many thanks for viewing and for your question. Oh this is a sore point. The drone has done just fine in the bag, it provides very good protection, as the bag is built like the proverbial tank. I have never had any concerns whilst transporting it in the bag. But unfortunately I had a mishap and a heavy landing which caused the gimbal to brake off. Not a massive problem in itself but the cables that connect to the antennas snapped and so I need new antennas, which are proving difficult to source. In the two years I have had the bag the only problem I have had with it is that one of the loops that the front/tripod flap securing hooks fasten into has come away from the stitching whilst I tried to tighten it. Not a big problem as I have been able to use another strap to act as an extension in order to fasten into one of the other loops.
Thanks Mark for great review . Do you think it's will fit 5d III + 7dII + 16-35 2.8, 70-200 2.8, 100-400 and Phantom 4 pro ? I know it's lot of gear but I looking for something to carry on during flights and I thin k 53D they won't carry on...
Hi Georgijus, many thanks for viewing and for the comments. I commented previously on the Phantom 4, I think it is about the same size as the 3 standard, but I have no direct knowledge of it. I have a 5D3, 70-200 IS 2.8 (mk1) and a 16-35 f4, and, until recently, a 7D mk2 . You might just fit all the kit you mention in the bag. You can fit the two bodies, minus lenses, in the main compartment in the slots either side of the drone. The 16-35 should probably fit in the main compartment below the drone; my 16-35 f4 does easily (minus hood) however the f2.8 is slightly bigger. In the bottom compartment you may well be able to fit each of the two longer lenses, minus hoods, side by side, across the width of the compartment. My 70-200 fits easily and there is some room at the side to place another lens; I can get any of my other lenses alongside the 70-200 (24-105, or 24 TSE with a Lee filter adapter rings attached). You will definitely not fit both long lenses with lens hoods attached; if you need to attach the lens hoods then only one will fit. You will need to remove the main divider from the bottom compartment and use a thinner divider to divide the two lenses. The main divider is designed to operate as a U to give three small compartments in the bottom; however it is too long to act as a single divider across the full width and in any event would be too thick. As for carry on, again I have commented previously that I have not used it on aircraft; Comparing it to some Carry-On compatible Bags I do have, it is @ the same height and width but is deeper; it is @ 28cm (11 inches) deep, if that helps any?
Hi Mark .. thanks for the review, it is very good .... I am considering in picking up one of these bags, do you know if it will fit the phantom 4 pro ? / batteries ..... not sure if there is any difference in size are you ? thanks in advance John
Hi John. Thanks for your comment. Sorry I have no direct knowledge of the Phantom 4 and so can't give any guidance. The only thing I can see from the DJI site is that both the 3 Standard and the 4 Pro are the same size diagonally across, without blades. There is no mention about how tall each are. My 3 Standard stands @ 20 cm (8 inches) tall, if that helps?
Cheers for getting back Mark, appreciate it .... yep I since found the same diagonal distance, that is great giving me the height as I will compare now .... cheers, you still like the bag ? looks great, just pricey so I want to be as sure as I can ... J
Hi John. Yes I am still happy overall. I agree it is on the expensive side and I am especially content that I got my bag with a 20% discount! As stated in the video there are a few issues, and no bag is ever perfect for everybody. But for me, looking at the overall package, the degree of flexibility the bag provides as to how you can carry equipment, it was just what I wanted. The bag is heavier than some of its rivals, but I have found it very comfortable when on; in fact it is more comfortable than my standard camera backpack, an F-Stop Loka.
Good review, thanks for taking the time to make it. It answered several questions I had about the bag. Do you have any experience with using this as your carry-on for air travel? The size seems to be right at the limit for what is allowed. Getting ready to leave on a trip and this bag looks like it would be perfect in every other regard. Responses from anyone would be appreciated.
@@ellahull248 As this is the first award that I’ve received for a UA-cam video, I humbly accept it and would like to thank etc, etc………🤣🤣🤣 But please take pity on me, it was after all my first video, though things probably didn’t improve much thereafter, and it’s what comes of not using an auto queue and trying to remember everything🤔. Nevertheless many thanks for the view and comment. As an aside, I no longer have this bag, I sold it once I no longer used the drone.
Carry on suitable? I'm thinking of the 53L version though. Just to get some extra storage space for clothing. I had a 55L hiking bag that I used, and I was able to get away with it on some flights, but it was a large puffy bag. This isnt so much. So I want to know if the 53L would be carry on suitable
Hi Michael. I'm afraid I can't give you a definitive answer on this as I haven't used the bag as Carry-On. However comparing it to some Carry-On compatible Bags I do have, it is @ the same height and width but is deeper; it is @ 28cm (11 inches) deep, if that helps any?
Hi. Many thanks for your comment. Unfortuneatly I have no direct knowledge of the combination you mention. If it helps my Canon 5D mk3 plus 70-200 is about 27cm combined length; I would estimate that there would be @ 5 to 6 cm spare if I were to place it vertically in the main compartment of the bag (there might even be a little more as the top flap curves). I say estimate because my bag is configured for the drone and to carry camera and lens within the main body the bag would need to be reconfigured. Regards
Mark Lindstrom I received the Vanguard from Amazon today. So far I'm loving the build quality, looks and adaptability. However I'm finding it difficult to get the correct configuration for my phantom 4 pro. It's very tight and can't seem to find the bottom divider as shown in your configuration which separates the bottom of your drone from the lens. Any advice?
Hi David. If you are referring to the bit that was storing my 16-35 lens (@11:39 into video), if memory serves me correctly, this divider was in the top section of the bag, acting as the separator from the upper zipped access point, to the main body of the bag. You have to fold it over to make it fit. The working out and placement of the dividers to get the right config can be a bit of a puzzle, and since I set it up I have never altered it; I doubted that I would remember how I did it! I hope that helps?
Hi, apologies for delay in responding; no there are no locks on the side pockets and no real means to attach any, so security is pretty poor. I hope that helps.
This is one of the best reviews I have ever seen. Good job sir. Helped me no end.
Many thanks for viewing and for the comment.
One thing to be aware of, is that the loops that allow the hooks for the front panel to fastening into (at about 4m 30s), are not that well attached to the main body of the bag. One of the loops on my bag has eventually come away from the stitching. You need to be careful not to pull too tightly when tightening the straps.
@@MarkLindstrom Thanks for the heads up! I must admit, I'm not that impressed with the material they have used, especially considering quality of everything else. I did think about your suggestion of using standard webbing clips. Now, I settled on the 45D for various reasons, so yours may be different, but my guess is they went with the hook types because the gap when the flap is stowed is too small, and it would have left it a bit loose and, well, flappy.
I would have gone for the 51D as I liked the extra depth and width, plus the larger side access flap(I sometimes use a battery grip). However, the top and bottom compartments on the 45D are so well sealed off that I can't imagine even a paper clip could find its way into the wrong place. That's important for me as I'm using the bag to carry other things, non camera related, for overnight camping. I'm now looking for some suitable side pouches, much like the Bergen ones the army use, so that I can up my capacity.
Anyway. Really good review of an excellent series of bags. It's so useful to see other peoples loadouts before pulling the trigger. In the spirit of this I will share mine!
The bottom compartment on my 45D can take:
Canon EF 24-105mm f/4 L IS USM (with hood in ready to go position)
Canon EF 16-35mm f/2.8 L USM (with hood in ready to go position)
Canon EF 100mm f/2.8 Macro USM (no hood)
I also have a Canon EF 85mm f/1.8 USM which is much smaller, so either lives on the camera, or swaps out with the above.
Any of these lenses will fit in the side compartment on my 5DIII with the hood in place. I've also got a speedlight in that center section and a few bits and bobs including batteries and charger. There is some space free, but these bags do not have any baggy pockets, so anything thicker than a lens cap has to go in a padded section, or loose in the top compartment. Bit of a waste of space that so I'm probably going to attach some small pouches somehow.
I hope that helps someone out, and thanks again for an excellent review. As a small time creator myself I am well aware of how much effort goes into these things. Anyway, I watched a couple more of your videos so I've clicked subscribe.
Best of luck.
Fox.
This is just the review I needed to make my decision to purchase. Thanks!
Many thanks for viewing and commenting Jerry
Thank you very useful review , found it on the vanguard website !
Many thanks John, glad it was helpful. I wasn't even aware that Vanguard had linked to it. Cheers.
Excellent review
Many thanks
Great review, thanks. Thought it sounded like the best bag before it was released. It got a red dot design reward too. I see it for about USD$240.
Honest review unlike Mr Sims. Thank You.
Very good review. Thanks for this.
Fair review. Thank you!
Good review. That's me not buying it.. couple of things would get on me nerves. So the quest for a bag goes on.
Nice reviews, Very Informative.
One request, please review Gitzo adventury 45L backpack. There are not many reviews and I wish to have your detailed opinion on it. It would be great if you could review it
Many thanks Abhijnan for viewing and for your suggestion. Unfortunately, not being one of the UA-cam elite that get kit sent to them, I currently only review items that I've personally purchased. And whilst the Gitzo Adventury bags look very interesting, and have a few features that interest me, having recently bought a Shimoda (which I have reviewed), I'm not actually in the market for another bag.
Looking at some of the reviews available it appears that the Adventury 45 shares many features of the Shimoda, but adds the availability of Molle attachment points and a pouch on the waist belt. It also includes the camera storage unit, which has to be bought separately for the Shimoda; thus increasing the cost of that bag. But with the Shimoda you have the option to use different camera inserts and can make more adjustments to the carry straps, and even replace them.
Good luck in your search.
Nice review. I would like to point out the little thing you said you use to loosen the blades is what is used to tighten/untighten the lens on the phantom. Speaking of which, the proper way to carry your phantom on the outside is to turn the lens upward, and have the landing gear outward. This will solve your issue with the rain cover keeping the cover from covering properly. Cheers!
Was wondering about this. Good lookin out!
I hate these zip pockets which are located against a screen or other sensitive parts of camera!! There must be no hard elements which may touch those areas. Otherwise - great bag. 53 is better in this regard imho.
Hi Mark thanks for you very detailed review, but i don't think this bag will do for me i need something to carry my drone Mavic pro camera gear and my tent as i like to walk into the mountains for my photography. i will keep looking good luck with your channel
That neoprene pocket on the side of the bag where you had the small tripod attached is actually for you to slip two of the tripod legs into so the tripod does not flail around...give it a try. Slip the two legs through the band/strap part and into the neoprene pockets.
Hi. You're correct saying that the neoprene pocket can be used to slip two legs of a tripod into it in order to provide more stability, but it depends on the size and type of tripod as to how effective this is. For the types of tripod where the legs fold back on themselves for storage, such as the 3 Legged Thing, shown in the video, you cannot get two legs into the neoprene pocket, or even through the strap, in its normal storage mode due to the centre column being in the way. Obviously you can fold the legs the other way around (as if ready for use) which allows you to slide two legs in. However, dependent on the size of the tripod, it can potentially sit a little high above the top of the bag using this method. My other tripod, for example, that was shown being carried in the front carry straps in the video, is far too large to carry on the side of the bag with the legs resting in the neoprene pocket. But it can be carried with two legs slotted through the strap, and left to hang loose at the bottom. It is more secure than just slotting one leg through the strap. Many thanks for pointing this out; I had identified it prior to the video but forget to mention it.
Thank you Mark for the outstanding/detailed reply, and your video was pretty thorough. I just took this bag off my "buy & try" list thanks to your practical tip. My comment was based solely on what the manufacturer claimed in a product demo, but obviously what they claim it is meant to do and real life practicality do not always coincide. Even though my carbon fiber tripod is only 19 inches folded, it usually carries a heavier fluid video head/leveling base on top which makes it top heavy and unwieldy if not secured to a bag properly. I have a tactical style camelbak motherlode bag with molle attachment points that has worked out the best for me out of all the bags I've tried so far but it's a heavy bastard even before you add equipment due to its 1000 Denier Cordura genetics. I also like using bags that are covert and don't scream expensive equipment inside. My hunt for the "near perfect" camera carry system continues........
Ah the search for the perfect bag, or even near perfect bag, I too continue in this quest; I think it will be photographer's Holy Grail!!
Many thanks for your comments. Whether the following will help you or not, but I have had another go with my big tripod, which also has 19 inch legs when retracted (20" including the spikes). As I stated before, you can put two of the legs through the strap bit and let the tripod then slide down loosely. In this configuration the legs hang @ 5 inches below the bottom of the bag. I have a Manfrotto 327RC2 head on this tripod, which is also a bit unwieldy, but I have noticed that there is a loop at the bottom of the bag beneath the Neoprene pocket, through which you can thread a bungie cord (or something similar) to secure the base of the tripod. I haven't tried this out walking yet, only around the house, but it seems to keep the tripod reasonably steady.
Whilst some of my comments about the bag have been a little negative, I would say that it is a very comfortable bag to carry. My other rucksack bag is an F-Stop Loki, and I actually find the Vanguard more comfortable; the straps are broader and more padded and my back doesn't sweat as much.
Good luck in your search.
Many Thanks.
The neoprene pocket in the side can also be used for the tripod to make it more secure.
Great review though. I'm hoping to get one when I get a drone, so I can carry my dslr too.
Hi Will. Thanks for viewing and commenting. You're correct, the neoprene pocket can be used to make the tripod more secure, but it all depends on the type of tripod and size, as to how much impact it has. For the types of tripod where the legs fold back over the centre column when closed, such as the 3 Legged Thing I show in the video, it is only possible to get one leg into the sleeve, or even through the loop above it. For a more traditional tripod, two legs can be put into the pocket, but the pocket is only @23 cm or 9 inches deep, so if you have a largish tripod, it will stick up quite high.
It's a shame that the loop that is above the neoprene pocket wasn't an adjustable strap; it would then be possible to fasten a tripod more securely. However, if I need to fasten it more securely I will use the front fastening method.
Thanks for your reply.
With such a diverse range of equipment, I guess it's hard for companies to make a one size fits all model, especially when trying to fit a drone in with camera gear.
Those backwards folding tripods do look neat, and would be useful when flying as it could fit in a medium sized suitcase.
I guess I will have to find a store that stocks them to ensure my gear fits. Many thanks for your in depth review though..
I just bought it and find it quite huge... Does anyone have experience whether it is allowed as handluggage of most airlines???
i own this bad i dont have a drone but its very good and spacious and very nice to carry with the waist belt
Thanks for a great review. Very usefull, especially the part where you stated your height as a scale of the bag size. Its been 2 years now, how is the drone? Does it have problems after being carried around in a bag?? I have a phantom 4 pro and still use the hardcase that came with it.
Hi Many thanks for viewing and for your question.
Oh this is a sore point. The drone has done just fine in the bag, it provides very good protection, as the bag is built like the proverbial tank. I have never had any concerns whilst transporting it in the bag. But unfortunately I had a mishap and a heavy landing which caused the gimbal to brake off. Not a massive problem in itself but the cables that connect to the antennas snapped and so I need new antennas, which are proving difficult to source.
In the two years I have had the bag the only problem I have had with it is that one of the loops that the front/tripod flap securing hooks fasten into has come away from the stitching whilst I tried to tighten it. Not a big problem as I have been able to use another strap to act as an extension in order to fasten into one of the other loops.
How does this differ to the 53 model mate? Want either for an xmas prezzie
Thanks Mark for great review . Do you think it's will fit 5d III + 7dII + 16-35 2.8, 70-200 2.8, 100-400 and Phantom 4 pro ? I know it's lot of gear but I looking for something to carry on during flights and I thin k 53D they won't carry on...
Hi Georgijus, many thanks for viewing and for the comments.
I commented previously on the Phantom 4, I think it is about the same size as the 3 standard, but I have no direct knowledge of it.
I have a 5D3, 70-200 IS 2.8 (mk1) and a 16-35 f4, and, until recently, a 7D mk2 .
You might just fit all the kit you mention in the bag. You can fit the two bodies, minus lenses, in the main compartment in the slots either side of the drone. The 16-35 should probably fit in the main compartment below the drone; my 16-35 f4 does easily (minus hood) however the f2.8 is slightly bigger. In the bottom compartment you may well be able to fit each of the two longer lenses, minus hoods, side by side, across the width of the compartment. My 70-200 fits easily and there is some room at the side to place another lens; I can get any of my other lenses alongside the 70-200 (24-105, or 24 TSE with a Lee filter adapter rings attached). You will definitely not fit both long lenses with lens hoods attached; if you need to attach the lens hoods then only one will fit. You will need to remove the main divider from the bottom compartment and use a thinner divider to divide the two lenses. The main divider is designed to operate as a U to give three small compartments in the bottom; however it is too long to act as a single divider across the full width and in any event would be too thick.
As for carry on, again I have commented previously that I have not used it on aircraft; Comparing it to some Carry-On compatible Bags I do have, it is @ the same height and width but is deeper; it is @ 28cm (11 inches) deep, if that helps any?
Hi Mark .. thanks for the review, it is very good .... I am considering in picking up one of these bags, do you know if it will fit the phantom 4 pro ? / batteries ..... not sure if there is any difference in size are you ? thanks in advance John
Hi John. Thanks for your comment. Sorry I have no direct knowledge of the Phantom 4 and so can't give any guidance. The only thing I can see from the DJI site is that both the 3 Standard and the 4 Pro are the same size diagonally across, without blades. There is no mention about how tall each are. My 3 Standard stands @ 20 cm (8 inches) tall, if that helps?
Cheers for getting back Mark, appreciate it .... yep I since found the same diagonal distance, that is great giving me the height as I will compare now .... cheers, you still like the bag ? looks great, just pricey so I want to be as sure as I can ... J
Hi John. Yes I am still happy overall. I agree it is on the expensive side and I am especially content that I got my bag with a 20% discount! As stated in the video there are a few issues, and no bag is ever perfect for everybody. But for me, looking at the overall package, the degree of flexibility the bag provides as to how you can carry equipment, it was just what I wanted. The bag is heavier than some of its rivals, but I have found it very comfortable when on; in fact it is more comfortable than my standard camera backpack, an F-Stop Loka.
Good review, thanks for taking the time to make it. It answered several questions I had about the bag. Do you have any experience with using this as your carry-on for air travel? The size seems to be right at the limit for what is allowed. Getting ready to leave on a trip and this bag looks like it would be perfect in every other regard. Responses from anyone would be appreciated.
Hi Terry. Many thanks for viewing and for commenting. Unfortunately I don't have any experience of using this as carry on; sorry.
Definite contender for slow-talkers award. Otherwise, nice review.
@@ellahull248 As this is the first award that I’ve received for a UA-cam video, I humbly accept it and would like to thank etc, etc………🤣🤣🤣
But please take pity on me, it was after all my first video, though things probably didn’t improve much thereafter, and it’s what comes of not using an auto queue and trying to remember everything🤔.
Nevertheless many thanks for the view and comment.
As an aside, I no longer have this bag, I sold it once I no longer used the drone.
Carry on suitable?
I'm thinking of the 53L version though. Just to get some extra storage space for clothing.
I had a 55L hiking bag that I used, and I was able to get away with it on some flights, but it was a large puffy bag. This isnt so much. So I want to know if the 53L would be carry on suitable
Hi Michael. I'm afraid I can't give you a definitive answer on this as I haven't used the bag as Carry-On. However comparing it to some Carry-On compatible Bags I do have, it is @ the same height and width but is deeper; it is @ 28cm (11 inches) deep, if that helps any?
Can I put nikon D500+ 200-500 lens attached inside it vertically??
Hi. Many thanks for your comment. Unfortuneatly I have no direct knowledge of the combination you mention. If it helps my Canon 5D mk3 plus 70-200 is about 27cm combined length; I would estimate that there would be @ 5 to 6 cm spare if I were to place it vertically in the main compartment of the bag (there might even be a little more as the top flap curves). I say estimate because my bag is configured for the drone and to carry camera and lens within the main body the bag would need to be reconfigured.
Regards
Returning the Manfrotto D1 and getting the Vanguard after watching vid
Many thanks for viewing and for your feedback; I hope you like the Vanguard?
Mark Lindstrom I received the Vanguard from Amazon today. So far I'm loving the build quality, looks and adaptability. However I'm finding it difficult to get the correct configuration for my phantom 4 pro. It's very tight and can't seem to find the bottom divider as shown in your configuration which separates the bottom of your drone from the lens. Any advice?
Hi David. If you are referring to the bit that was storing my 16-35 lens (@11:39 into video), if memory serves me correctly, this divider was in the top section of the bag, acting as the separator from the upper zipped access point, to the main body of the bag. You have to fold it over to make it fit. The working out and placement of the dividers to get the right config can be a bit of a puzzle, and since I set it up I have never altered it; I doubted that I would remember how I did it! I hope that helps?
anything like lock at side poket？ thanks
Hi, apologies for delay in responding; no there are no locks on the side pockets and no real means to attach any, so security is pretty poor. I hope that helps.
Thx for your response :>
Too huge.
I fell asleep after 2 min ! Booooring