Why The MASSIVE Price Difference? $149 Seagull 1963 v $549 Sea-Gull 1963

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 27 вер 2024

КОМЕНТАРІ • 622

  • @thomrobs98
    @thomrobs98 Рік тому +525

    Less text on the dial, display case back, and the option for sapphire? I think I prefer the cheaper option!

    • @BEYSeamaster1
      @BEYSeamaster1 Рік тому +19

      That’s the one I’ve had for 10 months. It’s working perfectly and looks great.

    • @alectang1614
      @alectang1614 Рік тому +24

      The text is significant though - Jody should have found someone to translate it:
      - official watch says: China, Tianjin Watch Factory (which is the official name of the 1955 founded watch company)
      - unofficial says just: China, Tianjin

    • @BEYSeamaster1
      @BEYSeamaster1 Рік тому +5

      @@alectang1614 one of my friends told me it means Tianjin Watch Factory or something like that.

    • @thomrobs98
      @thomrobs98 Рік тому +24

      @@alectang1614 significant for some absolutely, still not sure that it's a $400 significance

    • @markplayford5836
      @markplayford5836 Рік тому +9

      100% a no brainer, cheaper wins hands down.

  • @CLaw-tb5gg
    @CLaw-tb5gg Рік тому +168

    As a general point, what I really like about it as well as a few similar watches (e.g. the Red Star chronograph) is the fact that it’s openly, proudly Chinese. It’s not trying to knock something else off or trying to hide what it is.
    Even if Chinese watches are (massively) less desirable than Swiss or Japanese watches, the mere fact that it’s something authentic makes it desirable in its own right.

    • @genghiskhan7041
      @genghiskhan7041 5 місяців тому +1

      Not really. I mean, I could crap in a box and it would be an authentic turd, but does that make it desirable?

    • @ddd-xf7nh
      @ddd-xf7nh 4 місяці тому +1

      @@genghiskhan7041 what a retarded point

    • @Max_Mustermann
      @Max_Mustermann 3 місяці тому

      @@genghiskhan7041 Depends. Is the author of said turd Marcel Duchamp or Jeff Koons?

    • @genghiskhan7041
      @genghiskhan7041 3 місяці тому

      @@Max_Mustermann Hey, how did you know I'm Marcel Duchamp?

    • @gabrokkerhun
      @gabrokkerhun Місяць тому

      @@genghiskhan7041 you didn't name your turd after an Italian luxury turd brand and copied the design of some world famous much more high quality turds so yes, I would respect your turd more for being authentic.
      Reminder that all Japanese technology was considered cheap trash a few decades ago and 90+% of Swiss watchmakers went bankrupt during the quartz revolution because they got outdone by Japanese watches in every way from price to quality.
      Things change.

  • @markadams2765
    @markadams2765 Рік тому +184

    I own the unofficial one. Seeing them compared side by side. I prefer the warmer look and the larger bezel of the unofficial one, it gives it a more vintage feel. Last time I checked it's accuracy was within +-2 seconds

    • @zhu8404
      @zhu8404 Рік тому +2

      The fake 1963 does not use a Seagull movement, the quality is very poor, and it supports the genuine 1963.

    • @J0hnny8ravo
      @J0hnny8ravo Рік тому +13

      @@zhu8404, what movement has the unofficial inside?

    • @jamesblonde2271
      @jamesblonde2271 Рік тому +9

      @@J0hnny8ravo same same

    • @korkser
      @korkser Рік тому +7

      @@zhu8404 lol

    • @margertrobbs
      @margertrobbs Рік тому +5

      I think the official one is more beautiful. I have both, and the official strap is much more soft. Serial number on the case back makes the watch so special. The most important is the genuine 1963 has 2 years warranty. The fake one was a trash, it struck after 5-months running.

  • @impsire
    @impsire Рік тому +29

    I own two of these. A 40mm Chrono Heritage M1963/X - SEA-GULL ST1901 bought directly from Sugess Watch in China and a 40mm limited edition Red Star bronze Seagull 1963 that came from the official Seagull 1963 store in Belgium. The Seagull is a watch that is hard to fault and I‘m quite fond of both of mine but my customer experience with both companies was hardly satisfactory. In sum I was swindled twice. The Sugess was supposed to come with the Swan Neck movement but didn‘t and unfortunately too much time had elapsed before I found out for me to be able to do anything about it. As for the Belgian Seagull 1963, it was only after I had received it that I found out that they do not individually number their limited edition watches (instead all 300 are numbered 1/300) and that it was missing it‘s tag, manual and registration QR code. It was also shipped about two months past it‘s preassigned shipping date. The company in Belgium casually dismissed my concerns and when I asked to return it they informed me that the 14 day return policy had expired. Be very careful who you buy from. The Seagull 1963 company in Belgium seems rotten to the core. I wouldn’t deal with them again if they paid me. BEWARE.

  • @cagataycakmak2280
    @cagataycakmak2280 Рік тому +28

    Sea-gull are shooting themselves in the foot by overpricing these and making them limited. If they made these 200 dolars and regular production, they would effectively kill the market for other variants.

    • @rem9011
      @rem9011 Рік тому +4

      They are all probably owned by the same Chinese firms and wouldn't be surprised if they are made in the same factory... so the official may be there to be a high margin cash grab while the rest are there for the average Joe looking for a bargain.

  • @syzygy9260
    @syzygy9260 Рік тому +94

    Thanks for the video Jody! For the bottom Chinese text, the unofficial version says "China, Tianjin", while official version says "China" on the top, and "Tianjin watch factory" on the bottom.
    Another interesting thing is that if you do a bit of digging around, some Aliexpress stores also list an unofficial version that is advertised to have a modified movement with a gooseneck regulator for about $10 extra - I don't have that version, or know if they are as advertised, but it's something people might want to look into.

    • @alectang1614
      @alectang1614 Рік тому +5

      Glad someone pointed the text out. I actually think it's significant because Tianjin Watch Factory was the original name of Sea-gull and that original name was used in 1955 when it was founded.

    • @paulgoyne6926
      @paulgoyne6926 Рік тому +14

      Oh great - now I have to wait for Jody's "Is a gooseneck regulator worth $10" video! ;-)

    • @PhilipBallGarry
      @PhilipBallGarry Рік тому +6

      Oh the irony 😉 That China, the master's of the copycat get ripped off by - the Chinese 😁👍

    • @davidh4653
      @davidh4653 Рік тому +1

      @@simonrobbins8357 My Seagull 1963 has "Made in China" written on it, but in Traditional Chinese rather than Simplified Chinese (中國製造) rather than (中国制造). I guess it would be accurate if it was trying to look like it was made before China switched to the simplified system.

    • @davidh4653
      @davidh4653 Рік тому

      @@simonrobbins8357 Yeah, I'm from Taiwan so the characters didn't even stand out as being wrong until I saw this video lol

  • @Geoduck.
    @Geoduck. Рік тому +23

    I bought a 38mm official version for $350USD about four years ago. The movement winds smooth and has a quality feel to it.

    • @johnking9999
      @johnking9999 Рік тому +1

      Wow you are lucky now it's 628 USD!!! I really like the official one but I'm kinda torn on if I should get the official or unofficial

    • @Geoduck.
      @Geoduck. Рік тому

      @@johnking9999 Wow, had no idea they cost so much now. On the other hand its a well made watch and the movement seems first class.

  • @morgan.enfield
    @morgan.enfield Рік тому +41

    Thank you Jody for this video. For a good interpretation it would have been even more explicit to compare two versions with the same acrylic glass. For information, since 2 or 3 years the unofficial versions have a transparent back with a larger opening than the one in the video. It would also have been nice to open the official version to see if the finish is better as claimed by some people. I think that the official version benefits from selected movements, the standard movements being intended for the other suppliers but nothing imho that justifies such a huge price difference.

    • @zhu8404
      @zhu8404 Рік тому

      The fake 1963 does not use a Seagull movement, the quality is very poor, and it supports the genuine 1963.

    • @hananidrisi6436
      @hananidrisi6436 Рік тому +12

      @@zhu8404 thats completely false bro

    • @calligramien8855
      @calligramien8855 Рік тому +1

      I've scoured reddit threads and apparently people are saying that the unofficial version starts to show signs of weakness after a few months or years (1 or 2 years, depending on how often the watch is worn), with some saying that the watch can't be a daily driver. Apparently, on the official version, the movements are checked and inspected, so they don't suffer from the weaknesses of the unofficial version, and even though it's more expensive, that's why I'm leaning towards buying the official version. I want to keep this watch for years, even my whole life, so I go for quality! (I lived in China for years, so there's also a sentimental value for me in having this Chinese watch).

    • @piojulian64
      @piojulian64 8 місяців тому

      I also went for the official one. . . Too many variants out there for the unofficial ones, I was at a loss which to pick. . .

  • @dedave
    @dedave Рік тому +37

    I have the unofficial version and prefer it. The display case back and sapphire crystal are improvements that I like. I am not a fan of cloth straps so I put a shark mesh band on mine. The polished mesh works well with the all polished case.

    • @paulmcloughlin9939
      @paulmcloughlin9939 10 місяців тому +1

      What’s the best place to purchase this watch?

  • @Conchafrutal
    @Conchafrutal Рік тому +9

    I remember talking about this 3 years ago in a previous video. Nice research.
    One more thing I'd like to add, the movement on the genuine is signed by Seagull and visibly has more quality than the 3rd party one. Btw got mine on 11/11/2019 at the great price of 250 euros (sales + coupons)

  • @sylvainck4666
    @sylvainck4666 Рік тому +3

    I heard the story that both are actually official. A manufacturer in HK got the official authorization from seagull to produce the ‘unofficial’ one.

    • @brianmccord7387
      @brianmccord7387 Рік тому

      Actually that comes up in Jody’s previous video. I always thought Sea-Gull was protesting too much on that basis alone.

  • @quinninstrumets8259
    @quinninstrumets8259 Рік тому +8

    Thanks for this video, I’ve often wondered the exact same thing as I went to buy my 63 two months ago. I bought through Red Star the apparent non-official, 42mm, sapphire, display case back, and I love it, took off the green nato and put on the leather strap. It’s one of the few mechanicals I bought that I’ve never opened to regulate, it keeps crazy excellent time.

    • @eric21881
      @eric21881 Рік тому +2

      i went red star as well, really wanted the display case back and a factory made watch. Though i really like the smaller bezel on the orginal now that i see it, the bezel reflects a bit of light and toneing that down through a smaller bezel could be really nice.

    • @GBOB68
      @GBOB68 11 місяців тому

      ​@@eric21881The larger bezel is only on the unofficial one on this video because he chose the sapphire crystal. You can have the unofficial one identical to the official with the exception of the face printing.

  • @Razor_Burn
    @Razor_Burn Рік тому +9

    Another enjoyable video where you could get away buying the imitation as just as nice. Great review Jody!

    • @zhu8404
      @zhu8404 Рік тому

      The fake 1963 does not use a Seagull movement, the quality is very poor, and it supports the genuine 1963.

  • @WristwatchAddiction
    @WristwatchAddiction Рік тому +4

    I just picked up the “unofficial” version and really like the display back & that’s what caused me to go “unofficial”. Cheaper with more features & still the same movement, case and dial? Yea. It was a no brainer for picking up another fun military inspired timepiece

  • @MyRetroWatches
    @MyRetroWatches Рік тому +3

    Jody I am really glad it was you who made this video as it’s been screaming out to be made for years. You have the cams conclusion as me and many others. It’s far too expensive for what it is and for the old tech. The Sea-Gull movements tend to have a swan neck regulator which for tinkerers like me is useful but for an owner who can’t even see it under the case back it’s pointless.
    I have the cheaper version and love it for what it is. A very affordable double register mechanical chronograph. Brilliant to learn how the movement works on too.
    You would have to be a bit mad to buy the same watch for $600 especially when the cheap one also comes on sapphire if you want it.
    For the price they want there are far better watches out there so like you say you would have to REALLY want one.
    Good video mate.

  • @WATCHingJames
    @WATCHingJames Рік тому +4

    They are a great watch but I will be sticking to the cheaper option.
    But was great seeing them side by side

  • @MrDodgerdodson
    @MrDodgerdodson Рік тому +7

    This is the dilemma I run into in everything that I collect. Fragrance, sneakers, etc.
    If someone is making the exact same thing for a quarter of the price, it makes it difficult to buy the 'official' product.
    If it can be sold at a quarter of the price it means that the original has artificially inflated the price due to the brand name, so I don't really feel bad buying the dupe/clone/rep.
    If the price is within 20-30% then sure I don't mind supporting the original company, and celebrating their IP, but when companies wildly inflate the price because they are dining out on reputation and brand name I feel less likely to do so.

    • @fungusonus
      @fungusonus Рік тому

      Of course, often the cheaper version is much lower quality

  • @alanmckinnon6791
    @alanmckinnon6791 Рік тому +5

    I'm not buying the "official" label. We've been over this before Jody, and I reckon that Sea-Gull have a very tenuous at best claim to being official, they had not made this watch for decades until an ex-employee set up a deal to revive it in Hong Kong and Sea-Gull would supply movements. I reckon Sea-Gull got greedy.
    Great video Jody, I love my little 1963 with acrylic crystal and view it for what it is - a Chinese watch where every second batch has differences, usually in the sub-dial hands

  • @kabysummit5801
    @kabysummit5801 10 місяців тому +10

    I just bought the 38mm unofficial version. Beautiful watch. I love wearing it. I don't care what others think.

    • @ajp5961
      @ajp5961 7 місяців тому +2

      That's the way to go 👌

  • @mixodorians12
    @mixodorians12 Рік тому +4

    Love my unauthentic seagull.
    Think if I was so inclined (I am not) I would get the official one. It would make you feel like a Prince knowing everyone else is rocking a unauthentic knockoff and you have the real deal.

  • @robertwestinghouse4098
    @robertwestinghouse4098 Рік тому +4

    Great video. The movement is regardless excellent. The back story is fascinating, with Seagull buying the design and equipment to make it, and add more jewels.

  • @johnnyyuma7337
    @johnnyyuma7337 Рік тому +2

    I was wondering the same thing while browsing on Aliexpress. Thanks for clarifying!

  • @danh5977
    @danh5977 Рік тому +2

    Picked up a 1963 a few months ago thinking it had an acrylic crystal. Turned out it had a double dome AR crystal and in 40mm

  • @Hrethgir
    @Hrethgir Рік тому +1

    My 1963 came from Seakoss. The NATO strap it came with was much nicer, and it came with a brown leather that's nice too. That brown leather strap dresses it up way nicer than I expected.

  • @the5th2000
    @the5th2000 Рік тому +1

    I have a Sugess 40mm. Was inexpensive. I love it, it's great

  • @uncledude9424
    @uncledude9424 2 дні тому

    Just received a 40mm one with a cleaner looking dial that was bought from Sugess Watch. Love it. Just wish the nato straps are of better quality to match the watch.

  • @djinconroe
    @djinconroe Рік тому +4

    The extra line of text on the official watch is just two characters but I think it looks better with the single line. It's a minor thing really but all of the other differences are pretty trivial as well. It would never enter my mind to pay that much for one of these. Great video!

    • @jean-yvesferry4669
      @jean-yvesferry4669 9 місяців тому +1

      First line means China = Zhōngguó (as in made in China). The second line means Tianjin Watch factory = Tiānjin shōubiăo chăng (where the original Sea-Gull was made back in 1963)

  • @gilesspencer4278
    @gilesspencer4278 Рік тому +1

    Out of the two I'd go for the unofficial version but given the choice I'd get neither of them and buy the 'Hong Kong Ed' version instead.

  • @jsz1962
    @jsz1962 Рік тому +1

    I have the unofficial but it has the signed crown and slimmer bezel and I love it.

  • @WatchAddictionReviews
    @WatchAddictionReviews Рік тому +2

    id opt for the aliexpress $150 option 🎉😂

  • @gnipfl
    @gnipfl Рік тому +2

    Word is that the expensive version has such things as actual quality control with their movements. What kept me from buying one of the cheaper ones was the number of posts of people complaining about their watch failing within the first year of ownership. Right now, I would go for a quartz (!) version of the watch. The cheapest option, also made in china with the iconic look but reliable.

  • @iancatlin5985
    @iancatlin5985 Рік тому +1

    mine has two lines of text and a display caseback 🙂 Clearly unofficial, but still a stunning little watch

  • @keefw361
    @keefw361 Рік тому +1

    The unofficial one is much better the displayed case back alone made my mind up! Its pointless with a closed display case

  • @belmany
    @belmany Місяць тому +1

    The official store now also has a sapphire crystal and display case version

  • @younusimam-thesalamproject6340

    Definitely the display back is a huge advantage. That movement is the most beautiful in the budget space

  • @Ballacha
    @Ballacha Рік тому +2

    the replica does say "复刻版“ or "replica version" on the case back.

  • @Humbertin1974
    @Humbertin1974 Рік тому +1

    Great video Jody, I own the unofficial version and I am happy with it, no need to spend de extra money, i am waiting on a moonswatch to arrive.

  • @JTown506
    @JTown506 Рік тому +1

    This video is a subtle commentary of reps vs. genuine pricing. Looking at you Rolex.

  • @David-os2fb
    @David-os2fb Місяць тому

    I have wondered about QC differences between the two. I have two unofficial ones and both required work within 6 months which I was able to do myself. (One was a loose screw preventing chrono running and the other was the chrono reset in the movement broke and I bought a spare movement for parts to fix it).

  • @dealzguyYT
    @dealzguyYT 8 місяців тому +2

    I just pulled the trigger on the Sugess unofficial Segull 1963! It’s far better than the original as it has a sapphire crystal and a see through case back with the gold plated swan neck adjuster. There is zero reason to buy the official one for 3x the price when the movement infact is from the Tianjin factory so essentially both are same!

  • @tornagawn
    @tornagawn Рік тому +1

    Me! I just prefer the Acrylic, on the cheaper watch. It just seems more period authentic. Although sounds like it can be bought cheap,too?

  • @TurrimAurea
    @TurrimAurea Рік тому +2

    Great video mate, very useful, thanks! There is also a manufacturer in Hong Kong who makes different and very interesting versions of these watches, they are called HKED, it would be cool if you could review one of their pieces.

  • @mrjameschong
    @mrjameschong Рік тому

    If it were to have official versions, we would all have omega's, rolex's and other original high-end watches... but it is not like that... thanks for clarifying the doubts of millions of people my dear, greetings from Caracas, Venezuela

  • @TheTerryMarsh1
    @TheTerryMarsh1 Рік тому

    A limited edition of any published work, product, artwork, etc usually has a higher price tag.
    As well as price, consider:
    * customer service
    * maintenance
    * authenticity
    * accuracy
    * reliability
    * durability
    * longevity.

  • @808JuJu
    @808JuJu Рік тому +1

    To be fair, sea gull is a pretty great watch company imo.

  • @krystianstepien5835
    @krystianstepien5835 Рік тому +3

    I finally get one.
    Sapphire 40mm with a swan/goose neck regulator.
    Wow...just wow. I cannot say anything else to express myself. What an astonishing piece of watchmaking.

  • @randomhandle
    @randomhandle Рік тому +1

    This is an important video. Thanks for making it!

  • @rockon21ful
    @rockon21ful Рік тому +1

    I need an acrylic crystal and it's a Red Star from Marc at Long Island and believe he sells the Red Star brand, my hope is the domed crystal is the same on both watches and i can find a new piece!

  • @michaelr21
    @michaelr21 Рік тому +1

    Firstly, the QR codes can be authentificated via WeChat - not the internet. -
    The Movement on the original Version is much better decorated and very nicely engraved with chinese scripture. The movement quality is also better.
    I bought my original one for $280 (also from the Store you got yours), so - its absolutely true - the price went up by a great margin.
    Fortunately, back then I bought over 30 original Sea-Gull Watches (mostly from that Store) - the new price for them hast often doubled or tripled so i am not unhappy :D

  • @ronschwolsky1626
    @ronschwolsky1626 2 місяці тому

    The prices of all watches have gone up in the past few years. I've got two Swiss watches that have gone up 25% in price since purchase 3 years ago, so this is nothing out of the norm. That being said, I've got the official Sea-Gull 22 ZUAN w/sapphire crystal...love it.

  • @cleverson007
    @cleverson007 Рік тому +1

    I have the unofficial version. I bought through your link, last year. The one thing i don't like, is the lume on hands. Tinny, unnecessary, and brake the stetics on my opinion.

  • @harcotelindert
    @harcotelindert Рік тому

    I bought the Sea-gull when I was living in China around 2018 for around $250. Love it.

  • @imonimon1984
    @imonimon1984 Рік тому +1

    Jody, I have one that I bought for £20 on AliExpress! My one looks identical to both these two watches. However my one is quartz and the dimensions seem a bit bigger

  • @joshuaychung
    @joshuaychung Рік тому

    Thank you. This had been my on-going question until someone finally answered it for me on reddit.

  • @klching4741
    @klching4741 6 місяців тому +1

    Main difference is the QC.

  • @stevefrisch3426
    @stevefrisch3426 Рік тому

    Just ordered my first Brent!!! AM132-RD… no reviews online that I can see.

  • @chenwu8169
    @chenwu8169 Рік тому

    For the unofficial one, the display case back says"Seagull "Reissue of the First Aviation Watch of the Chinese Air Force"

  • @HeikosGarage
    @HeikosGarage Рік тому +4

    Hey Jody, have you ever taken a look at the $25 quartz version of the seagull 1963? Great video as always. Greetings, Heiko

    • @SleepyRainRealm
      @SleepyRainRealm Рік тому

      It seems like a scam

    • @HeikosGarage
      @HeikosGarage Рік тому

      @@SleepyRainRealm you mean the quartz is a scam?

    • @SleepyRainRealm
      @SleepyRainRealm Рік тому +1

      @@HeikosGarage I mean, they could be fake, I've seen them on Ali and for the pictures of the reviews they have poor quality compared to this watch

    • @HeikosGarage
      @HeikosGarage Рік тому

      @@SleepyRainRealm I bet you are right. Watching Jody constantly makes me want to buy more watches. Sometimes I throw in a quartz to keep the prize down.

  • @hgr.7857
    @hgr.7857 Рік тому

    I got a Red Star SG1963 38mm with swan neck & sapphire dome and OG sub-dial hands from the Seakoss store on AliExpress. Love the watch, it looks great. HOWEVER: It needs regulated, badly. It looses MINUTES per hour. Sometimes the seconds sub-dial stops ticking. The red timer hand gets stuck (not often, but once is enough & it has occurred more than once) when passing 12:00. Since it doesn't keep proper time and cannot be relied upon, I never wear the little beauty. It's a really nice looking & complex paperweight.
    I've looked into a servicing and now my cheap auto chrono would be costing less to replace outright (😐) than to have serviced (???) Arrrghh
    Prbly should take advantage of the 11.11 sale to get right with this. 🤔
    Edit: Upon reading the statements above, it begs the question "why"? I obviously got a lemon, but would a same person take the risk of getting burned 2x or just take the 'L' and move on? I've already spent the replacement costs on some 11.11 Pagani PD1701 Speedy clomages... 🤷🏼 Watch ppl are not sane

  • @benn0723google
    @benn0723google Рік тому

    Been looking on ebay and they have them for £180, they look amazing, thanks for the video about them

  • @unclekerry9361
    @unclekerry9361 8 місяців тому

    Proud to say I just purchased my first Seagull I will get it appraised @ 4:05 he mentioned he did not know what the text meant; well using snap pic of my own and google translate top text is CHINA or zhong guo and bottom text is Tianjin watch factory.. my model is the Panda which doesnt look the same the numbers are Bars not Numerical Digits not sure if that makes a difference ... the back cover also is engraved with CLASSIC EDITION .... any one that as information please reply back to help the rest of the community ... this is my first investment watch and turns out its muddy waters to start but I am not detoured from future purchases I will only buy watches I am willing to wear so even if its a waste of money its really not because I still have a watch style I enjoy. Congrats to all whom start and good luck to you all.

  • @Aleister82
    @Aleister82 Рік тому +8

    The movements that Sea-Gull uses for the watches they produce themselves are top-grade movements, whereas the third-party manufacturers have to settle with whatever quality they can get their hands on.

    • @Louiscare
      @Louiscare Рік тому +1

      Definitely not true, seagull produces a ton of these movements, it is possible they have a bit tighter margins for their own, but at only 5500 units there are still so much movements left that this wouldn't make a difference. I have a strela reproduction which uses the st19 movement and it runs +0+1. Also unofficial movements can have swan neck regulators which makes it very easy to regulate

    • @Aleister82
      @Aleister82 Рік тому +4

      @@Louiscare I really doubt, Sea-Gull used that chronograph movement solely for this 1963 model. Also, it doesn't mean that the top grade movements are unavailable for purchase for third party manufacturers. I'm only stating, that Sea-Gull itself uses only their top-grade movements for their watches.

    • @Louiscare
      @Louiscare Рік тому

      @@Aleister82 of course they don't, but why would they not advertise that their movements are of better accuracy ?

    • @calligramien8855
      @calligramien8855 Рік тому

      @@Aleister82 I totally agree with you, judging by the plethora of posts about non-officials, lots of people have reliability problems with their watches. As you say, the official version of Seagull uses the best movements, top quality, whereas it's not uncommon for non-official watches to break after 8 months, a year or even two years. People call it a disposable 'watch', and in Europe you can get it for between 250 and 350 euros, depending on where the unofficial one comes from. Personally, I don't feel like throwing away 300-400 euros, so that's why I'm going for the official version. It's more expensive, but it'll last.

  • @moldveien1515
    @moldveien1515 Рік тому

    As a big fan of chinese history and a studen studying chinese, i will be getting this watch probobly the cheaper one when i get my next paycheck.

  • @Ttamlin
    @Ttamlin Рік тому

    FYI, the text on A's dial is "China TianJin wristwatch factory", and that on B's dial is "China Tianjin". No doubt that tracks with what we know about these wristwatches.

  • @tomepavleski9382
    @tomepavleski9382 8 місяців тому

    This watch is a replica of the first watch in outer space, Russian Strela. The design is almost identical and it uses Russian Poljot 3133 Caliber, Russians bought the machines for manufacturing the caliber in the 70s

  • @slaphead2965
    @slaphead2965 Рік тому

    Lol, Proud to be in the unofficial camp!
    😉👍🇬🇧

  • @chrisburn7178
    @chrisburn7178 Рік тому +16

    Bought an unofficial one recently and I'm very happy. The sapphire is worth it even though the bezel is a bit chunky and the display back is nice. A good watch.

  • @2008wrx
    @2008wrx 8 місяців тому +1

    You should have known that any unofficial/fake version is adding value to the true version. The more the fake models are, the better for the official one.

  • @spavliskojr
    @spavliskojr Рік тому +1

    Kinda confirms my suspicions

  • @SQueme
    @SQueme Рік тому +1

    4:45 watch A has a badly driven chronograph that has to be more carrefuly regulared on the engaging wheel
    => look at the chronograph hand : no fluid movement but some jumps ...

  • @rickybobby5950
    @rickybobby5950 Рік тому

    Based on reviews on this trusted watch channel, I have a champagne and Orange Sugess ‘Top Time’ homage with the ST1901 that is sold under the ‘1963’ style and it’s one of my favorite watches to look at. I purchased 2 from the Sugess store and the other one uses an automatic movement with an intricate silver dial and blued hands that is almost too nice to wear. I like these because they have a vintage vibe about them and are different from the ‘diver’ style that comprises most of my collection. Thanks to this channel, I have broadened my tastes and purchased a few pieces that I would not have otherwise considered. I’m not quite ready for a Vostok yet but maybe someday, until then I’ll be watching for Just one more watch that I can’t live without! 😂

  • @simonosborne3047
    @simonosborne3047 Рік тому

    Here was me just last night, trawling AliEx & wondering about this difference. Nice one Jody.

  • @JMGeranimo
    @JMGeranimo Рік тому

    One of the few Ali watches I want. Anyone recommend an Ali store to buy from. I hate the endless search with all the horrible or non existent descriptions. Thanks for the video man.

  • @JonathanNelson-nelsonj3
    @JonathanNelson-nelsonj3 Рік тому

    For the record, the text reads "China, Tianjin Watch Factory" on the original while the imitation says "Tianjin China".

  • @alectang1614
    @alectang1614 Рік тому +1

    There is another advantage to the official one - the dial text:
    - official watch says: China, Tianjin Watch Factory (which is the official name of the 1955 founded watch company).
    - unofficial watch says just: China, Tianjin.
    That in itself is worth a bit more credit as it's historically more accurate.

  • @philtheairplanemechanic
    @philtheairplanemechanic Рік тому +1

    The official non-sale price is starting to get close to Swiss chrono prices, like it's over half the price of some of Hamilton's offerings. I'd be hard pressed to pick an octogenarian movement over that at that price. But the cheap one is still a great buy.

  • @unknownriderinbound
    @unknownriderinbound Рік тому +1

    If were talking Chinese watches, isn't the unofficial version the authentic version by definition?

  • @robertbrandywine
    @robertbrandywine 9 місяців тому

    Amazon U.S. has the Sea-Gull at $711 and the Sugess at $269. There's also a Mukemao for $189 (on sale). I like everything about these watches except for the thickness (13.5mm) and the weight.

  • @pigsydney
    @pigsydney Рік тому +1

    I do like the Sea-Gull Chronograph,its odd i feel hard pressed to buy the Official Sea-Gull because of the price,however I am less bothered the price of the Baltic Bicompax.They both use the Sea-Gull ST1901 movement.Maybe I will get all 3.

  • @craig2100
    @craig2100 Рік тому +1

    Great lesson and always fun learning. Thanks for sharing Mate!

  • @valdecibessa5362
    @valdecibessa5362 Рік тому

    I think they are making both , but saw a potencial gain puting out other version and depreciate the old one

  • @m2pozad
    @m2pozad Рік тому +1

    I have several Chinese Specials, and homages, but dislike this thing. I instantly flash on Chinese New Year when I see one.

  • @saish9225
    @saish9225 Рік тому

    I was literally searching for a video like this yesterday. Was not able to find any on youtube. Thank you.

  • @artbynoir
    @artbynoir 24 дні тому

    the main difference is that seagull models are made in a completely different factory to the cheaper alternatives, the only step up in quality you're going to get is the finishing on the case and the dial, the movement remains the same.
    the disparity in price is because seagull is looking to position themselves as a luxury chinese brand and carving out their own niche among the european giants in watchmaking. i think the high price is a good thing for watchmaking and the timekeeping culture as a whole, so eventually (way down the line) chinese timepieces can be seen by the wider and general populace as something desirable and shed away the reputation of being cheaply made knock offs that will break in 2 days.
    as a side note, seagull has a good track record with honoring their warranties and with aliexpress, your mileage will vary (that being said, my experience with both have been great)

  • @carlodelavera9735
    @carlodelavera9735 Рік тому +1

    I got a $25 seagull 1963 with a quartz movement

  • @UnburdenedByWhatHasBeen
    @UnburdenedByWhatHasBeen Рік тому

    Never been a big fan of this watch because of the Chi Com star but i can appreciate its historical significance for the Chinese.

  • @karlsenula9495
    @karlsenula9495 Рік тому +1

    As far as I recall the original reasons to get the 1963 (either version) was always 1) for the ST19 movement (at the time the only inexpensive watch with an automatic chronograph) and 2) the Vostok kitsch of the Chinese Airforce on the dial.
    Today I would go with the Sugess branded ST19 movement Chronograph watch ... imo looks better/ more clean/ more traditional/ less kitschy than the 1963 with the same movement in a display caseback.

    • @GeneGirard007
      @GeneGirard007 Рік тому

      Are you talking about this watch: "Sugess Seagull Movement 1963 Automatic Mechanical Watch For Men 40mm Fashion Pilot Self Wind Sapphire Men Watch Man Luxury Date?"

  • @smudger671
    @smudger671 Рік тому +1

    I own the unofficial one which was about £100 when I bought it. I wouldn't dream of paying the inflated price for the official one. My only complaint is the crown is rather small and makes winding a bit awkward.

    • @JustOneMoreWatch
      @JustOneMoreWatch  Рік тому +1

      Every one of those ST19s winds differently as well! Some quiet, some loud etc etc. Ha!

  • @tkindschi
    @tkindschi Рік тому +1

    Not a big fan of "the look", but always liked the value in the mechanical chrono movement. So, I went with a Hemel Airfoil instead! Same wonderful movement, but in an honestly good looking package.

  • @JohnCannonBand
    @JohnCannonBand Рік тому +1

    The ones with the clothes case bags that are supposed to be official go for less on the secondary market because no one wants that one

  • @WatchmakerErik
    @WatchmakerErik Рік тому +23

    I'd probably pay, at most, $30 or so more for the official watch, all else being equal.
    One question I don't think has been addressed: is there a warranty or support difference? That might sway it.
    Honestly I love the look of the unofficial one's sapphire and bezel and I"m a sucker for case backs, so I'd save the extra $400 and get what I wanted more in the first place.
    Thanks, Jody :D

    • @JustOneMoreWatch
      @JustOneMoreWatch  Рік тому +9

      Well both watches have to go back to China, but I think there would be more value in the 2 year warranty of the original. I should have mentioned that, you are right!

    • @PaulBrunache
      @PaulBrunache Рік тому

      @@JustOneMoreWatch I never see a review from Sugess in this channel. I think they have great offering that might be good value for you to highlight. Great vid, great content as usual.🙏

    • @thegorn
      @thegorn Рік тому +2

      Chinese warranty? lol

  • @thomasshiow7052
    @thomasshiow7052 Рік тому

    Interesting video. I have the unofficial one. But I think I prefer the official one

  • @mazzochi2028
    @mazzochi2028 Рік тому +1

    I really want a sea-gull version, but the price has slowly increased from around 400usd to over 600usd at times. Just can't justify the cost.

  • @L1011MD11
    @L1011MD11 Рік тому

    The original reissue seagull 1963 watch has tailed dial hand on the right subdial only. The left sub dial has a tailless dial.

  • @lonniesharp9109
    @lonniesharp9109 Рік тому +4

    I can't bring myself to get one because of that red star and it's implications, yet I have zero problem getting a flieger. I'm not saying it makes sense, but that's the only reason I haven't bought one. Maybe one day I'll get over it. 😎

    • @TheMainCore
      @TheMainCore Рік тому +2

      Same for me. Buying one of these watches is like endorsing active and horrendous human rights abuse. Like, it's happening right now.

    • @Wvk5zc
      @Wvk5zc Рік тому +3

      @@TheMainCore lmao

  • @alecmoriarty
    @alecmoriarty Рік тому

    I feel like you could’ve changed the names from Sea-gull to Seiko and Seagull to San Martin and it would be the same argument we have about most Ali express watches.

  • @frankdefranco9436
    @frankdefranco9436 Рік тому +1

    I'm not a massive fan of anything when it comes to luxury products in life hahaaa. Specially watches, yes I'm a watch enthusiast BUT I have never obsessed over any of them, I buy what I can obviously.

  • @alexhollins5830
    @alexhollins5830 Рік тому

    A mecaquartz version with better waterproofing would probably do well.

  • @ИгорьЛис-б8р
    @ИгорьЛис-б8р Рік тому

    Hi Jody! Year ago I had conversations with man from channel "Sea Gull 1963" and he wrote me: "Tomas from the Red Star is the original designer from this homage (!!) watch in the yearly 2000's when he was working for Tianjin Watch Group Honkong (back then Sea Gull was split up in different sisters companis over different locations). All watches you see on line use genius Sea Gull ST 1901 movements from Tianjin but since Tomas never registered intellectual propertys of this watch design wich has based on the watch 1963 but looks completely different, in theory everyone could produce this piece :) The discussion between fake and real is s funny one since Red Star is the original producer of this homage watch but use a Sea Gull movement!" So, I hope this information will be useful to you!

  • @tomo9224
    @tomo9224 Рік тому

    Bless Google Translate, the Chinese text at the bottom essentially says the same thing. "A" says China, Tianjin Watch Factory. "B" says Tianjin, China