1. Simple Harmonic Motion & Problem Solving Introduction

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 7 лип 2024
  • View the complete OCW resource: ocw.mit.edu/resources/res-8-00...
    Instructor: Wit Busza
    We discuss the role problem solving plays in the scientific method. Then we focus on problems of simple harmonic motion - harmonic oscillators with one degree of freedom in which damping (frictional or drag) forces can be ignored.
    NOTE: These videos were originally produced as part of a physics course that is no longer available on OCW.
    Chapters
    0:00:00 Title slate
    0:00:27 Why learn about waves and vibrations?
    0:01:31 What is the Scientific Method?
    0:03:19 Ideal spring example
    0:10:27 Oscillations of a bird after landing on a branch (example of a more qualitative understanding of a physical phenomenon).
    0:12:53 The LC circuit (charge and current oscillations in an electrical circuit).
    0:24:17 Motion of a mass hanging from a spring (a simple example of the scientific method in action).
    0:25:07 Oscillation of a hanging ruler pivoted at one end (example of SHM of a rigid body-problem involves the understanding of angular motion, torques and moment of inertia).
    License: Creative Commons BY-NC-SA
    More information at ocw.mit.edu/terms
    More courses at ocw.mit.edu

КОМЕНТАРІ • 221

  • @CostaExtranjero
    @CostaExtranjero 10 років тому +62

    If you know your stuff you don't add unneeded complexity. I've seen this in almost all MIT videos. The teachers there actually care and want you to understand. Thank you MIT!!!

  • @pronaypramanick4467
    @pronaypramanick4467 4 роки тому +44

    Respected Professor, the reason you gave at 8:10 , for *"why u r going slowly"* , honestly saying, made me clap(out of appreciation + joy) at that very moment....U observed that seemingly common yet important thing which both our teacher and we tend to overlook .... *That was really "Richard Feynman-ish"*

    • @mridul2987
      @mridul2987 4 роки тому +2

      Ehm...ehm...ehm... But it wasn't Feynman-ish... The professor above is unique by his own. I highly recommend you to watch The Feynman Lectures, and then think about what you said. But I agree wityh you that this was a masterpiece...

  • @alexleviyev
    @alexleviyev 10 років тому +37

    This really has the calculus revisited feeling to it. I love it when all the information is already on the board so you can see it, and then the lecturer works through it. You see where you're starting, where you're going, and you can understand which points are important and which aren't. Very well done

    • @kiwi4731
      @kiwi4731 4 роки тому

      @Jean thanks for the reference! This brushed up my calculus so much

  • @BoZhaoengineering
    @BoZhaoengineering 5 років тому +10

    Professor Wit is awesome to explain the SHM. And his example just before end of the lecture is very inspiring. As a practicing engineer, we always use the “ general features” to predict the product we are designing. Superb! Than you professor.

  • @sarvesh0303
    @sarvesh0303 10 років тому +19

    Wow, his presentation on the blackboard is so clear and precise! Somehow, it increments my interest in this lecture

  • @RafaelHenrique-jz2vw
    @RafaelHenrique-jz2vw 6 років тому +31

    We need more teachers like you!!
    Congratulations

  • @seoulatheart2015
    @seoulatheart2015 10 років тому +5

    I've realized what a real pain it is to teach myself something but MIT is always very helpful. I'm glad I found this video, very helpful.

  • @supern0is349
    @supern0is349 3 роки тому +3

    this is to be honest, quite admirable and dare i say, even lovely
    a guy that even at this age, with white hair, still loves and understands the scientific method.
    Not only that, he cares enough about it to emphasize why it's so important so younger people can follow along
    this right here is a true scientist.

  • @nishantsinghsogarwaloffici7025
    @nishantsinghsogarwaloffici7025 3 роки тому +12

    Thank you so much for this wonderful lecture
    Love from Bharatpur Rajasthan India 🙏🏻🙏🏻🙏🏻🙏🏻❤️

  • @FingerThatO
    @FingerThatO 8 років тому +51

    THANK YOU MIT. my physics professor is the worst and this explained alot

    • @mdmobashshir432
      @mdmobashshir432 8 років тому +12

      +Misael Cifuentes lol every physics teacher seems the worst after a MIT lecture.

    • @beniwaljaat2312
      @beniwaljaat2312 6 років тому +1

      Every professor has something special noone is worst

    • @nazishahmad1337
      @nazishahmad1337 5 років тому +1

      @@beniwaljaat2312 yay actually u r ryt none of the professor are actually worst its actually r problem that we doesn't co operates with some of professorS

    • @nushaierhamza7969
      @nushaierhamza7969 3 роки тому

      @@nazishahmad1337 Not true. Some professors have a habit of torturing their students for no reason. My physics professor made me hate physics even though I'm an engineering student.

  • @markptak5269
    @markptak5269 10 років тому +15

    A new rock star is born. Thank you SOOO much for my kids generation!

  • @oWhiteMonster
    @oWhiteMonster 10 років тому +34

    Eyyy this professor has good hand writing, wow

  • @jayceeappi8592
    @jayceeappi8592 10 років тому +3

    You have seriously advanced my understanding of mathematics from this lecture. Thank you so much.

  • @DeepakAtreja
    @DeepakAtreja 9 років тому +15

    I am in eleventh standard and this video helped me a lot.
    Thanks

  • @Axelonmorales
    @Axelonmorales 5 років тому +29

    Thank you MIT this is an amazing lecture :D And an incredible professor

    • @mecheasy4024
      @mecheasy4024 5 років тому +2

      Yes really amazing lecture.

  • @unclefreddy2009
    @unclefreddy2009 10 років тому +5

    If only my college Physics professors were as clear. Fantastic

  • @data7traveller
    @data7traveller 8 років тому +2

    loved it!!

  • @Akshaygupta13
    @Akshaygupta13 3 роки тому +1

    In love with the board work and the lecture ♥️

  • @jesusalexispachecomonagas8664
    @jesusalexispachecomonagas8664 4 роки тому

    Greetings from Venezuela. The professor explain very well the topic, I understood almost Simple Harmonic motion.

  • @bibh947
    @bibh947 2 роки тому +1

    Thank You Sir Wit. Your teaching is really witty .

  • @sirikamons
    @sirikamons 9 років тому +1

    Thank you for sharing. It's very easy to understand. It's very best lecture that I've ever seen.

  • @Rupadarshi-Ray
    @Rupadarshi-Ray 4 роки тому +1

    Playlist: ua-cam.com/play/PLUl4u3cNGP62JTiv0epD_FMmUV6Y7wMv_.html

  • @loboalamo
    @loboalamo 10 років тому

    Love your blackboard set up too. Thank you.

  • @snigdhadobhal9679
    @snigdhadobhal9679 9 років тому +2

    This video is really helpful indeed, specially for understanding the mathematical aspect of physics

  • @mulunehgetnet4827
    @mulunehgetnet4827 8 років тому +1

    Thank you dear instructor for your clear explanation just I expect.

  • @Waranle
    @Waranle 10 років тому +1

    Thank you MIT, Prof Wit Busza

  • @pranavnair5317
    @pranavnair5317 5 років тому

    outstandingly exceptional impedance showcased by you sir hats off to you

  • @AlexBrunner94
    @AlexBrunner94 10 років тому +1

    Awesome. More of these, MIT. Please.

  • @rolandgerard6064
    @rolandgerard6064 10 років тому

    What a teacher!!! Amazing pedagogue.... Thank you sir..

  • @daedra40
    @daedra40 10 років тому

    Thank you MiT, thank you Professor Wit Busza.

  • @andrewjames6676
    @andrewjames6676 10 років тому +1

    A model of clarity. A model teacher.

  • @azad4921
    @azad4921 3 роки тому +1

    Great explanation, thanks MIT

  • @KelliDiMera
    @KelliDiMera 9 років тому +4

    This video is wonderful. Thank you.

  • @feiyanglin6879
    @feiyanglin6879 9 років тому +2

    Very helpful!! Thanks professor!

  • @physicsboy3108
    @physicsboy3108 3 роки тому

    Great!!!! More power to MIT and You sir!!! ❤️

  • @supriyaroy2738
    @supriyaroy2738 4 роки тому

    I just loved it. Very nice teaching.

  • @isadoralavina-macleod8432
    @isadoralavina-macleod8432 9 років тому +12

    ∴ l =1 meter. Mind blown. Dr. Busza.

  • @fxnoob7486
    @fxnoob7486 3 роки тому +1

    Beautiful explanation

  • @trungac2414
    @trungac2414 6 років тому

    thanks you Professor Wit Busza

  • @user-ue2gr7bv1m
    @user-ue2gr7bv1m 5 років тому

    Great professor and really fantastic lecture. helped alot thank you very much sir

  • @WiskundeTraining
    @WiskundeTraining 3 роки тому +1

    Excellent teacher👏👏

  • @Lemonjamin
    @Lemonjamin 10 років тому

    I really needed this! thanks!

  • @tonyjose5456
    @tonyjose5456 9 років тому +1

    That was really useful. Thank you prof

  • @johntelesengmec
    @johntelesengmec 10 років тому

    Absolutely AWESOME!
    Thanks!

  • @alimukhtar4759
    @alimukhtar4759 4 місяці тому

    This is exactly what i was looking for😊

  • @daedra40
    @daedra40 10 років тому

    This is the bomb. Thanks for all of it.

  • @abhaysankarml8546
    @abhaysankarml8546 3 роки тому +1

    I'm extremely thankful sir❤️❤️❤️

  • @dhananjaychavhan6192
    @dhananjaychavhan6192 9 років тому +4

    it was very easy to understand.........thanx a lot

  • @Amox625
    @Amox625 7 років тому +1

    Thank u sir for such a nice explanation

  • @fernandonora1464
    @fernandonora1464 10 років тому +25

    Dear Professor:
    First of all I want to thank you by this excellent video.
    I also want to make you a comment: In minute 42, when you write the equation of motion for a rule, you forget to explain why is possible to aproximate sinus(theta) by theta.
    At this point, maybe you could talk about MacLaurin development of sinus function and aproximation of small oscilations.
    It´s just a mathematical sugestion that could be useful for many students.
    Yours faithfully.
    Fernando Nora.

    • @GauravSingh-yv2sp
      @GauravSingh-yv2sp 6 років тому

      Fernando Nora it's because the value of sin theta is almost equal to theta(very small)

    • @touficfakhreddine6017
      @touficfakhreddine6017 5 років тому

      for small angles, sin theta is theta

  • @rolandgerard6064
    @rolandgerard6064 10 років тому

    Great lesson, thank you

  • @jardimmanuel
    @jardimmanuel 10 років тому

    Do you really need to get older to be so clear in such an explanation? Great lecture professor all The best for you.

  • @msunardi
    @msunardi 5 років тому +3

    When he said he'll be 'going through the gory details', I was hoping there are more explanations on how to arrive at y(t) = A cos(omega_0.t + phi). I understand that it satisfies the equations, but I think for a viewer who is not familiar with trigonometric functions and calculus, that would be a big void to cross

    • @pramodkharel2082
      @pramodkharel2082 4 роки тому +1

      this is for 2nd year undergraduate physics student. how can u can ask the professor for trigonometry classes...if u want to understand trigonometry and calculus see high school mathematics.

  • @RaficDalati
    @RaficDalati 10 років тому +5

    At 50:40 I don't understand how he can write theta(t) = (something) sin(w_0*t). Isn't the angle equation theta(t) = Acos(w_0*t +pi/2 ) here? why did the sine function appear? Can someone please explain?

    • @fedophile
      @fedophile 10 років тому +3

      MrOmnos It's better to understand conceptually what is happening, rather than memorising high school notes, otherwise you can end up looking pretty stupid. cos(theta + pi/2) = -sin(theta) ..

  • @nurihijau2262
    @nurihijau2262 9 років тому

    Nice video...i really understand with its concept used...

  • @avilahoti4244
    @avilahoti4244 2 роки тому +1

    Amazingly simple

  • @jorgevega7084
    @jorgevega7084 7 років тому

    Amazing!! Thank you

  • @VivianaVillanuevaPicolini
    @VivianaVillanuevaPicolini 9 років тому

    Thank you!

  • @Papayalexius
    @Papayalexius 10 років тому

    pretty simple. But really good teacher.

  • @blacktoothgriner
    @blacktoothgriner 2 роки тому

    1:30 in to the video and wow... just awesome.

  • @AdityaElectron
    @AdityaElectron 5 років тому +1

    Eureka... helped a lot

  • @kantawichpiyanirun2128
    @kantawichpiyanirun2128 6 років тому

    Thank you very much.

  • @ashishawasthi4350
    @ashishawasthi4350 6 років тому +1

    He is just awesome...

  • @hackeroo13
    @hackeroo13 5 років тому +1

    I love this man

  • @atharvat223
    @atharvat223 6 років тому

    in the first example till the object reaches equilibrium net force is in downward direction so even acceleration should be in downward direction thus making it negative so why is it
    shown positive

  • @sawansrivastava2838
    @sawansrivastava2838 4 роки тому

    😍 lovely lecture..

  • @sampannap26
    @sampannap26 9 років тому +2

    is there an extra sin taken in the solution of theta.... 50:20

  • @KavinTeenakul
    @KavinTeenakul 8 років тому

    Shouldn't -w0*(ang vel/w0) = ang vel ? Shouldn't w0 be cancel out? Why w0 remain? At 49:55

  • @mridul2987
    @mridul2987 4 роки тому

    MIT sure've got some finest teachers... No doubt

  • @fedophile
    @fedophile 10 років тому +1

    When talking about the LC circuit, he says "now let me derive the EQUATION OF MOTION".. hmm very interesting.

  • @thebizzle2605
    @thebizzle2605 10 років тому

    Awesome! !!

  • @shinhessen3073
    @shinhessen3073 10 років тому

    Thank you sir.

  • @pablopelaez721
    @pablopelaez721 10 років тому +4

    @Rafic Dalati
    because, cos( something + π/2) = sen (something)
    A it replace by the angular velocity with is: Angular velocity/wo because if you replace t=0 , then sen (0+π/2)=1 and the it go. anguluar velocity=-w0.A, he replace that A for angular velocity/wo

    • @MrMytubevidmaker
      @MrMytubevidmaker 10 років тому +1

      So what about the minus sign? So as you explain it, it results in: (Ang. vel.)/w0=-A and not just A.

    • @TKTBC777
      @TKTBC777 9 років тому

      Thank you so much

    • @Shumayal
      @Shumayal 8 років тому +1

      +Pablo Pelaez I know this is 2 years ago. But Angular velocity = 0 at t=0
      So how can you keep Angular Velocity at t=0 when you know Angular Velocity is Zero?

    • @finlay5033
      @finlay5033 2 роки тому

      @@Shumayal because (-angV/w0) x cos(w0 + pi/2) = (-angV/w0) x -sin(w0) @Imran Akram

  • @kedarkawade2482
    @kedarkawade2482 5 років тому

    Very helpful

  • @gustavobagu7156
    @gustavobagu7156 4 роки тому +1

    FIRST SPRING-MASS PROBLEM: There is something strange. You cannot have Y=0 at the point where both forces are equal, since according to your drawings, Y is measured from the basement line. That Y-value must clearly be positive

    • @netrapture
      @netrapture 11 місяців тому

      the basement line is Y=0. he defined the coordinate system that way.

  • @funkysagancat3295
    @funkysagancat3295 5 років тому +1

    Does anyone know some weird SHM aplications? I' m looking something beyond pendulums, strings, bridges, eardrums, water tubes etc...

    • @arunnegi93
      @arunnegi93 4 роки тому

      Any mechanical system when disturbed from stable equilibrium undergoes SHM. Waves and osciilations/vibration (in my view) has importance because of applications rather then being a subject by itself.....

  • @shristipandey3497
    @shristipandey3497 4 роки тому

    Thank you so much sir

  • @Schrodinger8509
    @Schrodinger8509 3 роки тому

    Thanks MIT

  • @maximusflash0997
    @maximusflash0997 5 років тому +2

    at 49:27
    cant we write
    sin(omega0t + pi/2)
    as
    cos(omega0t)

    • @Quasar.Chaser
      @Quasar.Chaser 5 років тому +2

      it will be -cos(omega0t)
      coz sin(pi/2 + x) = -cos(x)

  • @loboalamo
    @loboalamo 10 років тому

    I wish you were my instructor!

  • @luqkiiim
    @luqkiiim 4 роки тому +1

    how did he get the equation at 50:02 someone pls help :(

  • @Fr1sen0
    @Fr1sen0 9 років тому +2

    Thank you sir very much. Clarified a lot in my class.

  • @gustavobagu7156
    @gustavobagu7156 4 роки тому

    Regarding the first problem: You seem to measure distances from the base line at (let us call it "the floor")... but then, how come Y=0 is where both forces balance each other out? To my mind, that location should have Y positive.

    • @kevincardenas6629
      @kevincardenas6629 4 роки тому +1

      he didn't set y=0 at "the floor" he set it at the equilibrium point (a.k.a. when the forces cancel out) and so acceleration is zero at that point

  • @samuelhampongo7278
    @samuelhampongo7278 6 років тому

    Thanks soooo much

  • @mikkikiki3700
    @mikkikiki3700 7 років тому

    thanks ..sir

  • @sushantodas5948
    @sushantodas5948 5 років тому

    The magnetic field inside the inductor is variable implies that in the inductor there's an induced electric field,how come u have not included that in the line intergral

  • @bujiririemmanuel5091
    @bujiririemmanuel5091 2 роки тому

    Awesome

  • @user-xs2og4fy9d
    @user-xs2og4fy9d 7 місяців тому

    Love you sir

  • @lubime10
    @lubime10 7 років тому

    EXCELLENT !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

  • @surendrakverma555
    @surendrakverma555 2 роки тому

    Very good 🙏🙏🙏🙏

  • @pratiksharma8969
    @pratiksharma8969 6 років тому

    Prof. Busza is a nice Recruitment by MIT after Prof. Lewin

  • @MolodkinVA
    @MolodkinVA 10 років тому

    Прекрасно произносит, великолепный методист! Как его звать?

  • @RbtV92
    @RbtV92 10 років тому

    Is this going to be on edX after class.mech next spring???

  • @robinsingh905
    @robinsingh905 9 років тому +1

    in many books it is written that y= A sin(wt + fi)
    but sir say that it is cos.which one is correct?

    • @abhishekcherath2323
      @abhishekcherath2323 6 років тому +1

      both, doesn't matter.

    • @lordmurphy4344
      @lordmurphy4344 6 років тому

      Its cos if it starts from extreme point, where in it start from the amplitude. The value of the sum of wt and phi hence would be zero, if the distance from the mean position is the amplitude, or conversely it could be sin of wt + phi which would yield pi/2 to obtain the same value as the amplitude.

  • @prateeksingh6018
    @prateeksingh6018 5 років тому +4

    Well our indian teachers are on a whole new level of mastery of their subjects. But sir u are awesome too ☺😊

  • @Yu.mobile
    @Yu.mobile 3 роки тому

    is equilibrium tha pivot point ?

  • @tiagoinenglish
    @tiagoinenglish 2 роки тому

    I didn't get why did you divide the angular velocity by omega zero :(

  • @jshaku7905
    @jshaku7905 6 років тому +1

    Thanks for......

  • @muavilatuc3951
    @muavilatuc3951 3 роки тому +2

    It's really us Vietnamese students who learned this when they were 17 years old!!!

    • @curuy3090
      @curuy3090 3 роки тому +1

      And it's me Turkish student who learned it when they are 16 years old...

    • @mohsheenraza7376
      @mohsheenraza7376 2 роки тому

      I'm indian ....you should try jee advance paper which is entrance exam for engineering

  • @shylildude
    @shylildude 10 років тому

    what happened in 49:29? how did he solve for theta(t)?

    • @abhijitsingh734
      @abhijitsingh734 4 роки тому

      He use some trigonometry......very late reply😅😅