@@17cmmittlererminenwerfer81 The UA-cam algorithm for content checking is precisely what it says it is. A check on content. Even if UA-cam wants to factor in context, the technology to do that simply doesn't exist yet. The content creator can always submit his videos for manual review to get approval from an actual human being who actually watches the video.
This is what youtube is for. I have a very boring security job without any direct work tasks. Gonna sit down and watch this, and get paid! Knowledge is power. Thank you "Legendary Love"! PS. Emperor Decius reigned between the year 49 September to the year 251 June. Please correct.
I find this overview of historical narrative absolutely Brilliant and value the attention to direct order of information. This isn’t long in the tooth and looks admirable for the audience. Bravo. An entertaining attraction for the listening.” 👏
This is one of the best videos of Roman History, the fact that you went from Augustus to Constantine XII makes your video second to none!!! Edit: It was not Emperor Heraclius who introduced the themata system, it was Constans II
Theodosius The great, such a boss! Won two civil wars, solidified christianity for the world and last emperor to rule the empire as one before it split, 16 year rule and died of natural causes which is a pretty big deal with all the murdering of leaders going on with this empire! I’m slowly becoming obsessed with this history, so captivating and interesting!
Not bad! I will note that the Themes of Byzantium are per current scholarship (like Treadgold) attributed to Constans II rather than Heraclius. Overall good job!
Domitian was a great emperor who was hugely popular. You took the lazy way out and repeated what the upper class senators thought rather than a more nuanced view.
Interesting to see the inferior depiction of these caesars in the latter part of the empire. Where were the artists who could replicate the Roman beauties? Nikephoros III and Maria look quite lovely, though. (1:32:30)
They were able to do that but it wasn't needed anymore in terms of Christian Iconography with uses intentionally a non relist way of depicting human beings and the drawings that you see of the late Byzantine Emperors are taken from Medieval manuscripts written by monastic historians.
Great video. I think it's a huge mistake to praise Caesar/Augustus too much. I would argue the empire is best understood as the soviet union of the iron age. They succeeded in constructing a lot of megaprojects, but their rules was defined by gradually stripping away the rights and freedoms of the Roman people and economic decline. They managed to keep going for a while by constantly expanding and keeping the economy on life support with foreign plunder, but eventually their empire reached a practical limit and they had to stop. After that they tried keeping things afloat by constantly inflating the currency, mixing more and more lead into the coinage and constantly raising taxes. The result was a monetary collapse and people began fleeing their trades because they couldn't afford all the new taxes. In response to that they started making trades compulsory and hereditory, tying entire families to dying professions and requiring them to pay taxes in goods and services. Essentially they had created medieval serfdom. All the while they were enslaving the Romans and other conquered peoples they were playing chess using ethnic groups as pawns, pitting them against each other to avoid rebellions. By the time they were finished the romans were slaves and so outbred they barely resembled their ancestors and their former enemies were running the empire. Tankies love to visit the former USSR and marvel at all the brutalist monuments they created, but they studiously avoid acknowledging the misery needed to create them. Same goes for SPQRaboos, they love to point at triumphal arches and temples as evidence of Rome's greatness but they rarely acknowledge the social decline and economic devastation the empire caused, both to the Romans and the rest of Europe. The Roman empire was a dire warning, not something we should emulate.
I think you analysis is spot on, except I'm not sure we can make a direct comparison to the USSR specifically. There are a lot of similarities, but the culture and philosophical background was very different. It seems most empires eventually go through a regression very similar to what you described regardless of initial political starting point.
@@TheLegendaryLore I find the USSR comparison handy because no one except tankies try to defend it. It's bad in almost everyone's mind. The comparison is very broad but it really did have a surprising amount in common with communist regimes. I think empires are the regression. Once a ruling class ends up ruling multiple racial groups then they gain independence from the one they were supposed to be serving. Inevitably this result in them seeing their subjects as an annoying problem to be dealt with and turning on them. Still watching the rest of the video, it's a great summary.
Holy Roman Emperors should have been included. Contemporaries very much considered them to be Western Caesars, and it’s simply ahistorical to say that the greatest like the Ottonians or the Hohenstaufen were not Caesars of West every much as their predecessors.
Hail L.L.! This is a marathon work! Congratulations! The Roman 'Kings List' or 'Hall of Infamy'? My initial impression? What was it in these times that led to such a rise of testosterone? Was it something in their diet, or was it a genetic overload? I shall return (I'm at 28 mins in)
Thank you, Wendy :) What leads you to the conclusion that there was a rise in testosterone levels? Not saying I necessarily disagree, but I'm not sure what would support the assumption either.
@@TheLegendaryLore It's an observation of the characteristics: male dominance, violent power struggles for leadership, enlargement of territory, increase of population. I see a comparison with the same situation in animal herds: a need to migrate to better grazing for better fertility and better success in survival of their offspring. I understand that following a decline in the 'herd'/'nation' would naturally trigger the rise in testosterone of males and oestrogen in females to regenerate the strength needed to survive. I am wondering how that rise in hormones comes about. And yet the Empires of Man (territory) rise only to fall again, so does the surge in hormones rely on some solar/lunar/cosmic help?
@@TheLegendaryLore it's not a question that can be answered by one solution. I would suggest there are many factors involved to stimulate the cycles of regeneration in evolution, notwithstanding the metaphysical needs of the soul. Historical stories give us an insight into when it's happened in the past. Interesting that we can see it happening before our eyes in present situations. Thank you for the food that nourishes my mind :)
An excellent summary good sir! Seems like being a soldier in the Roman empire was a safer option than emperor. "Emperor for a year....murdered.... emperor for 4 months.... murdered..."
Thank you, brother! Yeah, it seems like a risky job. I'd be curious at some point to compare the lifespan of a Roman emperor to that of rulers of other empires and civilizations throughout history.
Three cheers for Theodora! I would like to have been a fly on the wall in her era. Strong women in a severely patriarchal empire would have been rare - and definitely in need of some cosmic support. My sister is a Leo, astrologically-speaking. She would definitely be up for Caesarship!
Why would anyone want to be emperor seriously as most were killed off because they could not please everyone. Julius ceasar killed the Republic but it also killed rome as when the emperors took over the fighting between them all was chaos.
Power is extremely addictive. The dopamine released by exercising power makes it essentially a drug to some people, and we all know the risks that addicts are willing to take for their next hit.
Want to be an emperor? There is 90% chance you’ll be murdered by the very guards who are supposed to protect you. 😅 What a trip. To be a Roman emperor was almost certain to end by murdered or forced to commit suicide. Who wouldn’t want that position?!
Valerian was such a loss.Soldiers can be so ungrateful in the Roman world. Donatives can be an eager companin for certain soldiers.If I became Emporer whilst in the field I would march on Rome after a vote by the soldiers,who hated the spoiled pretorians and disband them amongst the legions.My bodyguard in Rome would be chosen by myself and would change on a two year basis!Their wages would.d be a set rate that moved with the economy.Why they should be paid three times more than a front.ine fighting soldier is just plain wrong!
Augustus made and destoyed rome buy his own rules they never changed in time that was the bigest problem and in the end they lose everyting because of all the enemies Augustus made
That's fair. I do tend to agree with you. It's generally accepted that Rome lasted until the fall of Constantinople, but there are good arguments to be made that it ended long before that.
13:47 i thought marcus aurelius was murdered by his son commodus??? i saw a documentary where commodus suffocated marcus during a seemingly heartfelt embrace. *jokes*
Romulus was not emperor but king. The Roman Kingdom was the early beginnings, long before it became an empire. I'm currently working on a video on the kings. I tried looking up emperor Salah but got no results. Who was he?
@@diorocks5858 Thanks, brother! Sulla was dictator during the Republican era. He did become dictator for a few years, but retired and returned power to the people after he had implemented his reforms. I think they don't give him enough credit for that in popular history.
UA-cam won't let you say *suicide* in an historical context? What madness has this place descended into?
But yet documentaries labeled "Educational" let's you see boobs and sometimes genitals (birth)
UA-cam be on the rocks
maybe if they said the new woke term " UNALIVED " it might get through...
_ pes 20 T numerol _ 20 sid swastika gamadion _ pythagoras tetractys hexagram sexagram 20 _ atlas _ atlast20 _ 048 even _ 1235679 odd _ english T 20th letter _
This is the current state of the world we live in. And people just accept it because most of them live off of UA-cam.
@@17cmmittlererminenwerfer81 The UA-cam algorithm for content checking is precisely what it says it is. A check on content. Even if UA-cam wants to factor in context, the technology to do that simply doesn't exist yet.
The content creator can always submit his videos for manual review to get approval from an actual human being who actually watches the video.
“Murdered by his own pretorian guard” seems to be the theme here.
You'd think the emperors would have learned the lesson after the first few such cases.
With guards like these, who needs enemies…
These guys had the life expectancy of a Red Army soldier fighting on the Eastern Front.
This was a great video I watched it twice and laughed each time the narrator said Pupi-enus 😂..please tell me I wasn't the only one lol
Reminds me of Monty Python, The Life Of Brian.
LL is definitely one of my favorite channels(newer) on yt. I can't wait to fall asleep to this one
I appreciate that, brother, even if my contribution is to helping you fall asleep 😄
“His reign was brief… his reign was brief….his reign didn’t last long….his reign was short lived…” Holy crap, Rome. Chill out.
It looks like a lot of these reigns were like 20 years while the average president is 8
Five minutes in and we're already at Claudius? Hmm
This is what youtube is for. I have a very boring security job without any direct work tasks. Gonna sit down and watch this, and get paid! Knowledge is power. Thank you "Legendary Love"! PS. Emperor Decius reigned between the year 49 September to the year 251 June. Please correct.
I find this overview of historical narrative absolutely Brilliant and value the attention to direct order of information. This isn’t long in the tooth and looks admirable for the audience.
Bravo. An entertaining attraction for the listening.” 👏
Thank you so much for your kind words, friend 🤗
Takes one to ancient times and world, thanks for the best oration 🎉🎉🎉🎉
Tremenduos reccount complete and expertly narrated of the list of Roman emperors that followed from beginning to end of the empire.
Love your `straight to the point`approach. Subbed.
This is one of the best videos of Roman History, the fact that you went from Augustus to Constantine XII makes your video second to none!!!
Edit: It was not Emperor Heraclius who introduced the themata system, it was Constans II
Thank you, brother. For your kind words *and* for the correction. I'll have to look into this.
Came for the history lesson, stayed for Pupienus.
I believe his contemporaries referred to him as "Mr. PoopyButthole"
The visual accompaniment to your work is epic.
Thank you!
Excellent video. Thanks. So glad I found your channel.
Brilliant video. Very useful.
Theodosius The great, such a boss! Won two civil wars, solidified christianity for the world and last emperor to rule the empire as one before it split, 16 year rule and died of natural causes which is a pretty big deal with all the murdering of leaders going on with this empire! I’m slowly becoming obsessed with this history, so captivating and interesting!
Basil II was buried near a cavalry field so that "he could forever hear his troops" training for battle.
Bravo for this Empirical HisStory, L. L!
Ive been sleeping on some fire historical content.
Not bad! I will note that the Themes of Byzantium are per current scholarship (like Treadgold) attributed to Constans II rather than Heraclius. Overall good job!
Domitian was a great emperor who was hugely popular. You took the lazy way out and repeated what the upper class senators thought rather than a more nuanced view.
Romans are shiving each other more than the Egyptians...
Pretorian Guards: “Oh you’re doing a decent job? We don’t do that here”
*Pretorian Guards kill emperor and install an absolute lunatic*
Then that lunatic gets off by other members of the Pretorian Guard.
It lives on it’s called the Roman Catholic Church
Do a video on the popes
This channel should cover history of Turkey and its sultons.
Thanks
Thank you so much! 🙏
Great video. But your timestamped chronology has Titus and Vespasian out of order.
Thanks for the heads up, brother! I'll revise the timestamps right away.
thank you, !!!
love the channel
Thank you, brother!
One thing you learn quickly is the roman army and pretorian guard pretty much ruled rome and its rulers with an iron fist…
"you know this absolute ruler thing is kinda getting out of control...you know what we need? 3 more emperors...yeah that should put a lid on it"🤣
Interesting to see the inferior depiction of these caesars in the latter part of the empire. Where were the artists who could replicate the Roman beauties? Nikephoros III and Maria look quite lovely, though. (1:32:30)
They were able to do that but it wasn't needed anymore in terms of Christian Iconography with uses intentionally a non relist way of depicting human beings and the drawings that you see of the late Byzantine Emperors are taken from Medieval manuscripts written by monastic historians.
What im interested in is how much the faces of roman citizens back then have changed compared to today. Not even close to the average person.
We may yet hear America's untrustworthy leader say those words "I have fallen, yet I am still alive!"
Moscow in some respects was the 3rd Rome as a Byzantine princess was married to Ivan III.
Marcus Aurelius - Great emperor, wise philosopher, terrible father. 😅
The great Roman Empire was really just a chaotic mess.
A huge mess! 😄
I have yet to hear of a corner of the world that isn't a mess
Habar n-ai ce vorbești!
@@WildMen4444My room isn't a mess. I cleaned it after watching Jordan Peterson
@@ZM-dm3jg May you be blessed with the finest lobsters!
Great video.
I think it's a huge mistake to praise Caesar/Augustus too much. I would argue the empire is best understood as the soviet union of the iron age. They succeeded in constructing a lot of megaprojects, but their rules was defined by gradually stripping away the rights and freedoms of the Roman people and economic decline. They managed to keep going for a while by constantly expanding and keeping the economy on life support with foreign plunder, but eventually their empire reached a practical limit and they had to stop.
After that they tried keeping things afloat by constantly inflating the currency, mixing more and more lead into the coinage and constantly raising taxes. The result was a monetary collapse and people began fleeing their trades because they couldn't afford all the new taxes. In response to that they started making trades compulsory and hereditory, tying entire families to dying professions and requiring them to pay taxes in goods and services. Essentially they had created medieval serfdom.
All the while they were enslaving the Romans and other conquered peoples they were playing chess using ethnic groups as pawns, pitting them against each other to avoid rebellions. By the time they were finished the romans were slaves and so outbred they barely resembled their ancestors and their former enemies were running the empire.
Tankies love to visit the former USSR and marvel at all the brutalist monuments they created, but they studiously avoid acknowledging the misery needed to create them. Same goes for SPQRaboos, they love to point at triumphal arches and temples as evidence of Rome's greatness but they rarely acknowledge the social decline and economic devastation the empire caused, both to the Romans and the rest of Europe.
The Roman empire was a dire warning, not something we should emulate.
I think you analysis is spot on, except I'm not sure we can make a direct comparison to the USSR specifically. There are a lot of similarities, but the culture and philosophical background was very different.
It seems most empires eventually go through a regression very similar to what you described regardless of initial political starting point.
"We shouldn't praise Caesar/ Augustus too much"
Me: *sweats nervously in Imperial Cult*
@@TheLegendaryLore I find the USSR comparison handy because no one except tankies try to defend it. It's bad in almost everyone's mind. The comparison is very broad but it really did have a surprising amount in common with communist regimes.
I think empires are the regression. Once a ruling class ends up ruling multiple racial groups then they gain independence from the one they were supposed to be serving. Inevitably this result in them seeing their subjects as an annoying problem to be dealt with and turning on them.
Still watching the rest of the video, it's a great summary.
@@peterhoulihan9766 I think we're fundamentally in agreement :)
@@TheLegendaryLore Sorry for the effortpost if I was preaching to the choir 😅
Holy Roman Emperors should have been included. Contemporaries very much considered them to be Western Caesars, and it’s simply ahistorical to say that the greatest like the Ottonians or the Hohenstaufen were not Caesars of West every much as their predecessors.
Completely different empire
Hail to the Divine Imperial Divii!
I'm guessing you prefer the earlier years of the empire 😁
@@TheLegendaryLore Yes
You sir are extremely based for continuing past 476.
Thank you, brother!
Hail L.L.!
This is a marathon work! Congratulations! The Roman 'Kings List' or 'Hall of Infamy'?
My initial impression? What was it in these times that led to such a rise of testosterone? Was it something in their diet, or was it a genetic overload?
I shall return (I'm at 28 mins in)
Thank you, Wendy :)
What leads you to the conclusion that there was a rise in testosterone levels? Not saying I necessarily disagree, but I'm not sure what would support the assumption either.
@@TheLegendaryLore It's an observation of the characteristics: male dominance, violent power struggles for leadership, enlargement of territory, increase of population. I see a comparison with the same situation in animal herds: a need to migrate to better grazing for better fertility and better success in survival of their offspring. I understand that following a decline in the 'herd'/'nation' would naturally trigger the rise in testosterone of males and oestrogen in females to regenerate the strength needed to survive. I am wondering how that rise in hormones comes about. And yet the Empires of Man (territory) rise only to fall again, so does the surge in hormones rely on some solar/lunar/cosmic help?
@@TheLegendaryLore it's not a question that can be answered by one solution. I would suggest there are many factors involved to stimulate the cycles of regeneration in evolution, notwithstanding the metaphysical needs of the soul. Historical stories give us an insight into when it's happened in the past. Interesting that we can see it happening before our eyes in present situations. Thank you for the food that nourishes my mind :)
Emperor Pupienus. I’ll remember that one 🤭
I believe his cousin was featured in a Monthy Python movie.
@@TheLegendaryLore I’ll have to look for that! 😂
@@TheLegendaryLorehe had a wife, you know…
23:52 - might want to check those dates. Unless time was flowing backwards in 249.
Thanks, brother, I must have hit the wrong keys. He ruled to June 251. 249 was a crazy year, but not THAT crazy 😁
An excellent summary good sir!
Seems like being a soldier in the Roman empire was a safer option than emperor.
"Emperor for a year....murdered.... emperor for 4 months.... murdered..."
Thank you, brother!
Yeah, it seems like a risky job. I'd be curious at some point to compare the lifespan of a Roman emperor to that of rulers of other empires and civilizations throughout history.
Note to self: Don't displease my Pretorian guards.
Looks can be deceiving, but, according to their beliefs, they were insane as f.
Three cheers for Theodora! I would like to have been a fly on the wall in her era. Strong women in a severely patriarchal empire would have been rare - and definitely in need of some cosmic support. My sister is a Leo, astrologically-speaking. She would definitely be up for Caesarship!
How the humans, came through ages !
Last Roman emperor Constantine Palaiologos 1453
I mean it just feels like chat GPT talking at me in a more natural voice...
Why would anyone want to be emperor seriously as most were killed off because they could not please everyone. Julius ceasar killed the Republic but it also killed rome as when the emperors took over the fighting between them all was chaos.
Power is extremely addictive. The dopamine released by exercising power makes it essentially a drug to some people, and we all know the risks that addicts are willing to take for their next hit.
LOVE LOVE LOVE Caligula 😜
Who am I to judge 😄
John HURT 😂
Romen Empire fell becuase of greed everyone wanted the emperor spot so they would kill for it no matter what
no it fell because of the backstabbing of the Crusaders in 1204.
Want to be an emperor? There is 90% chance you’ll be murdered by the very guards who are supposed to protect you. 😅
What a trip. To be a Roman emperor was almost certain to end by murdered or forced to commit suicide. Who wouldn’t want that position?!
A risky job indeed!
Valerian was such a loss.Soldiers can be so ungrateful in the Roman world. Donatives can be an eager companin for certain soldiers.If I became Emporer whilst in the field I would march on Rome after a vote by the soldiers,who hated the spoiled pretorians and disband them amongst the legions.My bodyguard in Rome would be chosen by myself and would change on a two year basis!Their wages would.d be a set rate that moved with the economy.Why they should be paid three times more than a front.ine fighting soldier is just plain wrong!
22:15
Did I make a mistake?
@@TheLegendaryLore No, I just have a child like sense of humor. Thank you for the great video.
Haha, I admit, I had a chuckle when doing that segment, too.
You got me kinda nervous for a moment 😄
@@TheLegendaryLore The Virgin Biggus Dickus vs. The Chad Pupienus
what a wild ride
Thank you for watching, brother!
Augustus made and destoyed rome buy his own rules they never changed in time that was the bigest problem and in the end they lose everyting because of all the enemies Augustus made
Seems like there were more bad rulers than good ones, no?
I'd agree with you. A great ruler is probably the best kind of system of government, but they tend to have terrible sons or get deposed by tyrants.
Their faces looked like they've been beat to hell from all their battles over time 🤕🤕
It was a rough life 😄
much appreciated for your content. However, I am not a fan of including the byzantine period with the true classical Rome.
That's fair. I do tend to agree with you. It's generally accepted that Rome lasted until the fall of Constantinople, but there are good arguments to be made that it ended long before that.
Fake news, I never made Incitatus a priest. The rest I have no comment on.
You lost me at "When Augustus died of natural causes..."
It is the common thought that he died from old age. He was 75 after all. I'm always curious to hear other theories, of course.
2,000 years ago Augustus was old as dirt when he died… just sayin
Ah yes, the 'Livia killed everyone' theory...
Hostilian FTW
13:47 i thought marcus aurelius was murdered by his son commodus??? i saw a documentary where commodus suffocated marcus during a seemingly heartfelt embrace.
*jokes*
22:16 sorry, i have to say it: pupienus ---> poopy anus
Damn you, Hollywood! 😁
Friend, I suspect you'll appreciate this Short: ua-cam.com/users/shortsFzODRvfSSoo 😂
37:05 ah yes The Donation of Constantine, the totally true and in no way made up story lol
wow you mist out so many emperors your saying there was no salah there was no Romulus
Romulus was not emperor but king. The Roman Kingdom was the early beginnings, long before it became an empire. I'm currently working on a video on the kings.
I tried looking up emperor Salah but got no results. Who was he?
@@TheLegendaryLore your right and i look forward to your project. Sulla, i am still learning
@@diorocks5858 Thanks, brother! Sulla was dictator during the Republican era. He did become dictator for a few years, but retired and returned power to the people after he had implemented his reforms. I think they don't give him enough credit for that in popular history.
@@TheLegendaryLore Thank you to! most interesting to learn more and more, I already subscribed. Thanks for the knowledge about Sulla.
Pupienas
dude knew what he was doing 😉
Romig esa ko nabhi khich liya tha nabhi ko enak pe Chadha diya tha esa masi ko vapis leke agaya ab paribar banega esa masi ko bhi
TIL Pupienus is pronounced Poopy-Anus
What did the Romans ever do for us ?????!
_ hellenes gamadion 20 sid _ pythagoras tetractys hexagram sexagram 20 _ rome 20 T _ english T 20th letter _ atlas _ atlast20 _ 048 even _ 1235679 odd _