Every creator should welcome constructive feedback, as it often helps improve. Disrespectful comments are another thing. Some people would blame a creator rather than take responsibility for their own choices.
Regarding UPT. You can't have a coin that has positive price action when you have crazy emissions (considering number members they have) and no burn mechanism. Like i stated previosuly i am not touching that token any time before they start showing revenue from data sales and buying back/burning that token. And Seb, it's not ok to ride down with the bag of coins. You should know better.
You were right, Sanctum was oversubscribed. And i mentioned in my last comment that this might happen just because of sheer amount of capital on Sol and not much to do with it Apart Staking Sol and Jup. Though on this one i thought it will not be. I was wrong you were right. I do not remember exactly but wasn't UPT oversubscribed by quite much more than that? Still, i have to see what actual value does Cloud bring and what kind of products they can build. So far it was just a game with a lot of promises. And i have seen that too many times with countless projects. What was the averge price you got CLOUD for depositing into the vault?
No, UPT was not oversubscribed at all. I understand what you mean about $CLOUD. It's a governance token, and these things can be complex. I just bought it at $0.30. It has been fluctuating between $0.29 and $0.31 with no significant movement.
How are the depioneers nft work with being backed by depin tokens? Are Your able to sell it back to them later in this cycle for a higher price then what the market floor is.
When the values of the tokens backed by the NFT go up, the price goes up as well, you could choose to sell or hold. I covered it in this video: ua-cam.com/video/pm_wZ9hna7s/v-deo.htmlsi=dnx7j_q9efwfsHP9
Hearing that the dePioneers team is open to your feedback; please let them know they should hire great artists for making the NFT art; what they are offering now is really awkward; I wouldn't want to have any of those poor-quality illustrations on my wallet along my precious NFTs. I know aesthetics is not something the dePioneers team cares about; you can see that also in their website design and their poor typography criteria, But if they are doing NFTs, they should care so much more about the the design. The same thing I mentioned before with Solflare, why would you choose to have branding when there are so many great designers already in Solana and web3? Why would dePioneers choose to make poorly drawn NFTs when they could hire any of the many web3 amazing artists? these poor unprofessional choices are difficult to understand.
Yeah, I agree that the art isn't impressive. I'm more interested in the SPL 302 standard. Can you mention again what you're talking about with the self layer? If you're referring to a UI refresh, I imagine they're working on something like that. They understand that the UI needs improvement.
@@SebMontgomery regarding Solflare, I mean, not only the UI needs refreshing, but the whole brand identity! Their logo seems to be taken from a Windows 95 free clipart catalog, the Solflare logotype is set in a cheap font with a 90's-futuristic look, their website is ugly, and the official off-dark orange color is sad… everything looks ugly, dated, and uninviting. Phantom and all the new platforms are precisely the opposite, super sexy designs with bright colors, beautiful illustrations, professionally made logos, sexy branding, etc. It's a pity because, in terms of function, Solflare is very good; but they have a tasteless visual identity.
Mate if you are being sponsored by Depioneers then be honest about it. I trusted you and now you are telling us to buy the NFTs again. You had a chat with them and they convinced you? What changed? Seriously sus man
Hey John, If I'm sponsored by something, it's announced and put in the description. I have no sponsorship with Depioneers. I'm not suggesting buying an NFT again. I'm saying exactly what I've said in my videos: I'm willing to take the risk and mint them, but it's not guaranteed. If you're not willing to risk it, you can take the loss of 0.5 SOL and abandon it if you want. What changed is that I spoke about the things they didn't do, and Tufan said he wants to work on those things.
Every creator should welcome constructive feedback, as it often helps improve. Disrespectful comments are another thing. Some people would blame a creator rather than take responsibility for their own choices.
The Bonk-SOL DLMMs are a good place to start. You just need to put in enough liquidity to make the low fees worth your time.
Hi Seb ! How do we mint ? Please make a video guide.
Can you do a video on the top 5 projects on the Solana network, in your opinion?
Hey Seb, did you have a look at Non Fried Chicken? seems to be gaining traction and pre sale is closing soon
cloud price is holding up really well, though its only been less than an hour so far lol. lets see what happens
I agree
waiting for more meteora vids. Thanks for the awesome content.
Working on it! Thank you for watching!
Regarding UPT. You can't have a coin that has positive price action when you have crazy emissions (considering number members they have) and no burn mechanism. Like i stated previosuly i am not touching that token any time before they start showing revenue from data sales and buying back/burning that token. And Seb, it's not ok to ride down with the bag of coins. You should know better.
Love your positive approach. Just know that you're appropriated ❤
Thank you so much, I appreciate your support greatly.
You were right, Sanctum was oversubscribed. And i mentioned in my last comment that this might happen just because of sheer amount of capital on Sol and not much to do with it Apart Staking Sol and Jup. Though on this one i thought it will not be. I was wrong you were right. I do not remember exactly but wasn't UPT oversubscribed by quite much more than that? Still, i have to see what actual value does Cloud bring and what kind of products they can build. So far it was just a game with a lot of promises. And i have seen that too many times with countless projects. What was the averge price you got CLOUD for depositing into the vault?
No, UPT was not oversubscribed at all.
I understand what you mean about $CLOUD. It's a governance token, and these things can be complex.
I just bought it at $0.30. It has been fluctuating between $0.29 and $0.31 with no significant movement.
any thoughts on when DAO voting will begin.
I'm not certain, but possibly around the end of this month, I will keep the channel updated
How are the depioneers nft work with being backed by depin tokens?
Are Your able to sell it back to them later in this cycle for a higher price then what the market floor is.
When the values of the tokens backed by the NFT go up, the price goes up as well, you could choose to sell or hold. I covered it in this video: ua-cam.com/video/pm_wZ9hna7s/v-deo.htmlsi=dnx7j_q9efwfsHP9
Thanks for replying mate
Hearing that the dePioneers team is open to your feedback; please let them know they should hire great artists for making the NFT art; what they are offering now is really awkward; I wouldn't want to have any of those poor-quality illustrations on my wallet along my precious NFTs. I know aesthetics is not something the dePioneers team cares about; you can see that also in their website design and their poor typography criteria, But if they are doing NFTs, they should care so much more about the the design. The same thing I mentioned before with Solflare, why would you choose to have branding when there are so many great designers already in Solana and web3? Why would dePioneers choose to make poorly drawn NFTs when they could hire any of the many web3 amazing artists? these poor unprofessional choices are difficult to understand.
Yeah, I agree that the art isn't impressive. I'm more interested in the SPL 302 standard.
Can you mention again what you're talking about with the self layer? If you're referring to a UI refresh, I imagine they're working on something like that. They understand that the UI needs improvement.
@@SebMontgomery regarding Solflare, I mean, not only the UI needs refreshing, but the whole brand identity! Their logo seems to be taken from a Windows 95 free clipart catalog, the Solflare logotype is set in a cheap font with a 90's-futuristic look, their website is ugly, and the official off-dark orange color is sad… everything looks ugly, dated, and uninviting. Phantom and all the new platforms are precisely the opposite, super sexy designs with bright colors, beautiful illustrations, professionally made logos, sexy branding, etc. It's a pity because, in terms of function, Solflare is very good; but they have a tasteless visual identity.
🎉🎉
Mate if you are being sponsored by Depioneers then be honest about it.
I trusted you and now you are telling us to buy the NFTs again. You had a chat with them and they convinced you? What changed? Seriously sus man
Hey John, If I'm sponsored by something, it's announced and put in the description. I have no sponsorship with Depioneers. I'm not suggesting buying an NFT again. I'm saying exactly what I've said in my videos: I'm willing to take the risk and mint them, but it's not guaranteed.
If you're not willing to risk it, you can take the loss of 0.5 SOL and abandon it if you want. What changed is that I spoke about the things they didn't do, and Tufan said he wants to work on those things.
@@SebMontgomery thanks for the clarification Seb
TRUMP AT BTC CONF????? THAT IS UUUUUUUUUUUUGE
I see what you did there haha!