Are baba Yudhishthir bewakoof 1% nahi the balki sabse zyada buddhiman the, ve Drishtdyumn ko senapati banaye the, Shikhandini to is yuddh me milne se bahot pehle hi apne vivah keliye gender change kar chuki thi matlab vo stree thi hi nahi fir common sense hai ki ye saari baat-cheet galat dikhaye hai poora. Aur aap Samrat Yudhishthir ka naam aadar samman se lijiye, director ne to Yudhishthir ko yahan galat dikhaya taaki safai di ja sakey ki streeya kyo hissa nahi li is yuddh me, Yudhishthir ji ne streeyo ko lekar aisa koi faisla kabhi nahi diya
Iss show me shakuni ko zyaada buddhimaan dikhaane ke liye yudhishthir ko kam gyaani dikhaya gaya hai. Lekin real me yudhishthir bohot buddhimaan the. Kewal dyut sabha me vo fas gaye the. Aapko br chopra mahabharat dekhni chahiye.
Yahan galat dikhaya ja raha hai, aisa koi chaal nahi chala tha Shakuni aur Yudhishthir ne aisa koi faisla nahi liya.. Shikhandini ka gender change operation pehle hi ho chuka tha unke ek rajkumari se vivah keliye, is yuddh se bahot pehle hi Shikhandini stree se purush ban chuki thi
Jis taraf shree krishn h usse koi confuse nhi hona chahiye aur dusri sab shree krishn hi h jo sab krte he unki mrji k bina koi kuch nhi kr skta ye to sirf logo k liye ayana he baki sab shree krishn ye sara sansar me bahi h age dekho tb smjh ayega
Yuddh ke niyam akele Shakuni ne nahi, sabse bujurg hone ke kaaran Bheesm ne banaye the aur Pandavo ke aur se Dhristdyumn ne maana tha... Yeah saare niyam tootega...
@@Unofficial-zd4cg Because it is time waste to reply to persons like you who will keep on arguing that Kunti is the basis for all the mistakes of Karna. It is his mother who make him like that blaa blaa blaa without even thinking twice or analysing deeply. Then why should I waste time to give reply to people like you who keep on blaming the supporters of Pandavas and make others believe that Karna didn't do anything intentionally? Any people who read Mahabharat deeply can understand that Kunti came not to beg lives of her 5 sons or 4 sons. But she wanted him to join with her other sons. It was Karna who gave boon to Kunti that he will spare his 4 brothers just to satisfy his ego that he is daan veer. If he gave boon like that due to affection for his 4 brothers he shouldn't have mocked them after he destroys their weapons, chariot. Also he gave them deep injuries and not normal injuries especially Yudhishtir on the 17th day. Had Shalya not intervened he would have even dared to break his promise and may kill Yudhishtir. Similarly on the 14th day at one point he attacked Bhima mildly but at another point he attacked Bhima strongly with an intention to kill Bhima
@@harikrishnank1996 I never said Kunti was the basis for all of Karna's mistakes. It would be absurd of me to make such statements. I say one thing, and you assume many. I only said it was Kunti's selfishness to care more about her respect than anything else. Obviously, Karna suffered because of her, but it was his actions that bore their own fruits. He is to be blamed for his evil actions. However, this does not mean Kunti had no part to play. Anyone who has read the Mahabharata deeply would base their arguments on logic. I assert that Kunti approached Karna with the intent of turning him towards the Pandavas, but this was driven by her own fear for her sons. This is evidenced by the passage that clearly reveals her state of mind before meeting Karna. Does the text explicitly mention that Karna spared the lives of the four Pandavas out of ego? No! That is your own assumption, which lacks basis. This was a secret boon, and Karna had no fame to derive from it. It was an act of charity to his fearful biological mother, who became satisfied only after receiving his promise, knowing Arjuna was capable and safe with Krishna. So yes, she cared more about her five sons than Karna. This guilt weighed heavily on Yudhishthira when he learned the truth, and it is mentioned that Kunti went to the forest in repentance for her actions. I hope you have read the Mahabharata in its entirety and are not relying solely on someone else’s interpretations. Now, regarding harming the Pandavas-why shouldn’t Karna harm them? Didn’t Bhishma and Drona also harm the Pandavas? Karna was fighting for his friend, and the Pandavas were his enemies. Why shouldn’t he harm them? His friends, brothers and own sons were killed in front of him, why shouldn't he act like a Kshatriya? Even so, he kept his vow to not kill them, no matter what you say. When, because of this vow, he attacked Bhima mildly and saw Kaurava brothers sacrificing their lives for him, why wouldn’t he feel anger and frustration? Can you even imagine the pain of seeing his allies die before his eyes while he, bound by his vow, felt he wasn’t fulfilling his duty to his friend? It was only after this that he decided to attack Bhima more severely, which allowed him to overpower him. Later, Karna insulted the Pandavas, possibly to weaken them mentally or out of frustration for not being able to kill them and secure victory for his friend. Specifically, with Bhima, the text mentions that Karna insulted him by reminding him of past humiliations suffered during childhood. For a Kshatriya, defeat and insult were equivalent to death, as seen in Yudhishthira’s case. By doing this, Karna essentially upheld his loyalty to Duryodhana by killing Pandavas in such manner. As the commander-in-chief, leaving a warrior like Yudhishthira alive while insulting him was a strategic move to demoralize the Pandava side and boost the confidence of the Kaurava soldiers. All these nuances should be considered when conducting a deep analysis. I don’t understand why you view MB with a Hero vs. Villain mindset-perhaps you watch too many movies. In real life, humans are flawed. Almost everyone in the Mahabharata was flawed and made mistakes. Learn to accept that. And, more importantly, read the Mahabharata from start to finish before attempting any analysis.
Bro don't see negative comments of people just ignore it and say anything whatever you want to say in the end and of video share share your good and bad thoughts of character and etc. And actually this Mahabharat is 70% accurate by the real Mahabharat and b.r chopra Mahabharat 90% accurate by the real Mahabharat (Bhagavad Gita) So you don't have to worry about this Sean correct or fake just watch it and enjoy it Basically 1. Faithfulness to the Epic: B.R. Chopra’s Mahabharat (1988): Considered more faithful to the original Vyasa's Mahabharata. Adopts a storytelling style directly referencing the Sanskrit text, often citing verses and interpretations. Sticks closely to the major events without significant creative liberties. Dialogues are philosophical and reflect the depth of the epic. Mahabharat (2013): Takes creative liberties to modernize the storytelling. Focuses more on dramatic and visual appeal, adding some fictionalized subplots and relationships for effect. Tends to simplify or dramatize certain philosophical discourses and events to appeal to contemporary audiences.
Shakuni ne Samrat Yudhishthir ko sirf 1 baar fasaya tha Dyut me vo bhi Awaam ko khatre me daalkar, uske alawa Yudhishthir ko Shakuni kabhi nahi fasa paya. Serial ke dikhaye har "safaibaazi" wale scenes ko sach na maaniye. Yudhishthir par har chiz ki zimmedari jo ve nahi kiye uski bhi thopne ka silsila Br chopra ne shuru kari jo sab baad ke serials follow kiye unhi chizo ke safai dene keliye. Aap chaaho to Urdu me Mahabharat kitab ka pdf mil jaega aap vo padhke asli Yudhishthir kitne dimagdar the aur kitne shaatir the ye sab khud padh lijiye. Krishna bhi Yudhishthir ko apna Guru maante the unke dimag ke vajah se hi
Yudhistir ko aise dikhaya gaya hai, with sakuni as well, Sakuni said to Diryodhan that let’s accept shanti prastav, but Duryodhan wanted war, neither he use to walk like that nor he had eyes as such, read the real Mahabharata people who are opposing your reaction they all have read it, that’s why they are saying it, director doesn’t like Yudhistir, I would suggest read Mahabharat, Shikhdini will kill Pitamah,,,
Mein gaaliya nahi deti hu aksar lekin aap log hadd cross kar rahe ho Yudhishthir ko bewakoof kehkar, pehle bhi aap log Yudhishthir ji ka vahan apman kiye jahan unki koi galti nahi thi aur ab bhi. Kum se kum apna dimag lagaiye ki us samay sab gadhe nahi the, Krishna aur saare Rishi bewakoof nahi the jo Yudhishthir ko Dharmraaj aur RaajRishi positions diye, agar ye sab ve sach me kiye hote to log unka samman karte hi nahi, Pandu se bhi zyada Yudhishthir ka samman tha to kya vajah rahi hogi? Khud sochiye, jo jo khitab Pandu Shantanu vagera ko nahi mila vo sab Yudhishthir ko hi kyo mila? Seedhi si baat hai ki BR Chopra ke samay se Karn ko bechara aur Yudhishthir ko dusro ke har faisle ka thekedar dikhaya gaya jo aage ke serials ko follow karna pada kyonki hinduo ki sabse badi kumi hai ki zyadatar Hindu Mahabharat padhte nahi hai, bas serial me dekhe hue ko sach maante hai isliye ek serial ko apne pehle ke serials ke major points follow karna padta hai apni TRP keliye aur BR Chopra ne Yudhishthir ko sab chiz ka zimmedar dikhaya kyonki Yudhishthir DharmRaaj hai, unke naam pe dikhane me humare parents ke zamane wale itne sawal nahi karte isliye har ghatna ki safai keliye Yudhishthir ko aage rakhe jahan Yudhishthir the bhi nahi. Khud apna dimag lagaiye ki kyo Pandu Shantanu Vasudev Balram etc kisiko bhi Dharmraaj ka position kyo nahi mila? Kyo inme se kisiko Rishi/Krishna/etc apna Guru nahi maane? Aur Urdu me Mahabharat padhiye samay nikaalke tab aap Mahabharat me sabse zyada izzat Yudhishthir aur unki samajhdariyo ko hi denge sab kirdaro se zyada ye mein guarantee deti hu
Age age dekho krishnaji kya karte hai.thanks for the episodes.continuity rahi aur maja aya.mera ab bhi suzav hai ki aap BR chopraji ki original Mahabharat dekhiye.wo iss se far better hai.
Are baba Yudhishthir bewakoof 1% nahi the balki sabse zyada buddhiman the, ve Drishtdyumn ko senapati banaye the, Shikhandini to is yuddh me milne se bahot pehle hi apne vivah keliye gender change kar chuki thi matlab vo stree thi hi nahi fir common sense hai ki ye saari baat-cheet galat dikhaye hai poora. Aur aap Samrat Yudhishthir ka naam aadar samman se lijiye, director ne to Yudhishthir ko yahan galat dikhaya taaki safai di ja sakey ki streeya kyo hissa nahi li is yuddh me, Yudhishthir ji ne streeyo ko lekar aisa koi faisla kabhi nahi diya
Iss show me shakuni ko zyaada buddhimaan dikhaane ke liye yudhishthir ko kam gyaani dikhaya gaya hai. Lekin real me yudhishthir bohot buddhimaan the. Kewal dyut sabha me vo fas gaye the. Aapko br chopra mahabharat dekhni chahiye.
Yahan galat dikhaya ja raha hai, aisa koi chaal nahi chala tha Shakuni aur Yudhishthir ne aisa koi faisla nahi liya.. Shikhandini ka gender change operation pehle hi ho chuka tha unke ek rajkumari se vivah keliye, is yuddh se bahot pehle hi Shikhandini stree se purush ban chuki thi
Yuddhisthir ne shuru se hi Dhristdyum ko senapati banaya tha and shikhandi Purush tha yuddh se pahle se hi. Yha thoda galat dikhaya h
Jis taraf shree krishn h usse koi confuse nhi hona chahiye aur dusri sab shree krishn hi h jo sab krte he unki mrji k bina koi kuch nhi kr skta ye to sirf logo k liye ayana he baki sab shree krishn ye sara sansar me bahi h age dekho tb smjh ayega
Next episode?
Sabse jada yudhishthir hi buddhiman hai is mahabharat me galt dikhaya hai ye scene kabhi hua hi nahi tha
Hindu... tan man Hindu jeevan Ragh ragh hindu ......🕉 Mera parichya ❤
Yuddh ke niyam akele Shakuni ne nahi, sabse bujurg hone ke kaaran Bheesm ne banaye the aur Pandavo ke aur se Dhristdyumn ne maana tha...
Yeah saare niyam tootega...
Pahle din se donom paksh donom taraf se group attack kiya
@@harikrishnank1996 Why do you delete your comments some time after posting them?
@@Unofficial-zd4cg Because it is time waste to reply to persons like you who will keep on arguing that Kunti is the basis for all the mistakes of Karna. It is his mother who make him like that blaa blaa blaa without even thinking twice or analysing deeply. Then why should I waste time to give reply to people like you who keep on blaming the supporters of Pandavas and make others believe that Karna didn't do anything intentionally?
Any people who read Mahabharat deeply can understand that Kunti came not to beg lives of her 5 sons or 4 sons. But she wanted him to join with her other sons. It was Karna who gave boon to Kunti that he will spare his 4 brothers just to satisfy his ego that he is daan veer. If he gave boon like that due to affection for his 4 brothers he shouldn't have mocked them after he destroys their weapons, chariot. Also he gave them deep injuries and not normal injuries especially Yudhishtir on the 17th day. Had Shalya not intervened he would have even dared to break his promise and may kill Yudhishtir. Similarly on the 14th day at one point he attacked Bhima mildly but at another point he attacked Bhima strongly with an intention to kill Bhima
@@harikrishnank1996 I never said Kunti was the basis for all of Karna's mistakes. It would be absurd of me to make such statements. I say one thing, and you assume many. I only said it was Kunti's selfishness to care more about her respect than anything else. Obviously, Karna suffered because of her, but it was his actions that bore their own fruits. He is to be blamed for his evil actions. However, this does not mean Kunti had no part to play. Anyone who has read the Mahabharata deeply would base their arguments on logic.
I assert that Kunti approached Karna with the intent of turning him towards the Pandavas, but this was driven by her own fear for her sons. This is evidenced by the passage that clearly reveals her state of mind before meeting Karna. Does the text explicitly mention that Karna spared the lives of the four Pandavas out of ego? No! That is your own assumption, which lacks basis. This was a secret boon, and Karna had no fame to derive from it. It was an act of charity to his fearful biological mother, who became satisfied only after receiving his promise, knowing Arjuna was capable and safe with Krishna.
So yes, she cared more about her five sons than Karna. This guilt weighed heavily on Yudhishthira when he learned the truth, and it is mentioned that Kunti went to the forest in repentance for her actions. I hope you have read the Mahabharata in its entirety and are not relying solely on someone else’s interpretations.
Now, regarding harming the Pandavas-why shouldn’t Karna harm them? Didn’t Bhishma and Drona also harm the Pandavas? Karna was fighting for his friend, and the Pandavas were his enemies. Why shouldn’t he harm them? His friends, brothers and own sons were killed in front of him, why shouldn't he act like a Kshatriya? Even so, he kept his vow to not kill them, no matter what you say. When, because of this vow, he attacked Bhima mildly and saw Kaurava brothers sacrificing their lives for him, why wouldn’t he feel anger and frustration? Can you even imagine the pain of seeing his allies die before his eyes while he, bound by his vow, felt he wasn’t fulfilling his duty to his friend?
It was only after this that he decided to attack Bhima more severely, which allowed him to overpower him. Later, Karna insulted the Pandavas, possibly to weaken them mentally or out of frustration for not being able to kill them and secure victory for his friend. Specifically, with Bhima, the text mentions that Karna insulted him by reminding him of past humiliations suffered during childhood. For a Kshatriya, defeat and insult were equivalent to death, as seen in Yudhishthira’s case. By doing this, Karna essentially upheld his loyalty to Duryodhana by killing Pandavas in such manner.
As the commander-in-chief, leaving a warrior like Yudhishthira alive while insulting him was a strategic move to demoralize the Pandava side and boost the confidence of the Kaurava soldiers. All these nuances should be considered when conducting a deep analysis.
I don’t understand why you view MB with a Hero vs. Villain mindset-perhaps you watch too many movies. In real life, humans are flawed. Almost everyone in the Mahabharata was flawed and made mistakes. Learn to accept that. And, more importantly, read the Mahabharata from start to finish before attempting any analysis.
Yudhishthir ka Dharm keval Yudhishthir ke vijay ka kaaran bana tha
Aap log please daily basis prr 2 full episodes lane ki koshish karein.... kyuki daily 2 episodes se excitement jyada rehegi
Bro don't see negative comments of people just ignore it and say anything whatever you want to say in the end and of video share share your good and bad thoughts of character and etc.
And actually this Mahabharat is 70% accurate by the real Mahabharat and b.r chopra Mahabharat 90% accurate by the real Mahabharat (Bhagavad Gita)
So you don't have to worry about this Sean correct or fake just watch it and enjoy it
Basically
1. Faithfulness to the Epic:
B.R. Chopra’s Mahabharat (1988):
Considered more faithful to the original Vyasa's Mahabharata.
Adopts a storytelling style directly referencing the Sanskrit text, often citing verses and interpretations.
Sticks closely to the major events without significant creative liberties.
Dialogues are philosophical and reflect the depth of the epic.
Mahabharat (2013):
Takes creative liberties to modernize the storytelling.
Focuses more on dramatic and visual appeal, adding some fictionalized subplots and relationships for effect.
Tends to simplify or dramatize certain philosophical discourses and events to appeal to contemporary audiences.
Shikhandi was a trans and was never a senapati in this war.
O bhai yudhishtir ji ne aisa kuch nhi kaha ye serial walo ne extra joda hain , shikhandi ji real me transgender the aur vo yudh me bhi the
Shakuni ne Samrat Yudhishthir ko sirf 1 baar fasaya tha Dyut me vo bhi Awaam ko khatre me daalkar, uske alawa Yudhishthir ko Shakuni kabhi nahi fasa paya. Serial ke dikhaye har "safaibaazi" wale scenes ko sach na maaniye. Yudhishthir par har chiz ki zimmedari jo ve nahi kiye uski bhi thopne ka silsila Br chopra ne shuru kari jo sab baad ke serials follow kiye unhi chizo ke safai dene keliye. Aap chaaho to Urdu me Mahabharat kitab ka pdf mil jaega aap vo padhke asli Yudhishthir kitne dimagdar the aur kitne shaatir the ye sab khud padh lijiye. Krishna bhi Yudhishthir ko apna Guru maante the unke dimag ke vajah se hi
Sikhandi half male aur half female thi .
❤
Yudhistir ko aise dikhaya gaya hai, with sakuni as well, Sakuni said to Diryodhan that let’s accept shanti prastav, but Duryodhan wanted war, neither he use to walk like that nor he had eyes as such, read the real Mahabharata people who are opposing your reaction they all have read it, that’s why they are saying it, director doesn’t like Yudhistir, I would suggest read Mahabharat, Shikhdini will kill Pitamah,,,
Mein gaaliya nahi deti hu aksar lekin aap log hadd cross kar rahe ho Yudhishthir ko bewakoof kehkar, pehle bhi aap log Yudhishthir ji ka vahan apman kiye jahan unki koi galti nahi thi aur ab bhi. Kum se kum apna dimag lagaiye ki us samay sab gadhe nahi the, Krishna aur saare Rishi bewakoof nahi the jo Yudhishthir ko Dharmraaj aur RaajRishi positions diye, agar ye sab ve sach me kiye hote to log unka samman karte hi nahi, Pandu se bhi zyada Yudhishthir ka samman tha to kya vajah rahi hogi? Khud sochiye, jo jo khitab Pandu Shantanu vagera ko nahi mila vo sab Yudhishthir ko hi kyo mila? Seedhi si baat hai ki BR Chopra ke samay se Karn ko bechara aur Yudhishthir ko dusro ke har faisle ka thekedar dikhaya gaya jo aage ke serials ko follow karna pada kyonki hinduo ki sabse badi kumi hai ki zyadatar Hindu Mahabharat padhte nahi hai, bas serial me dekhe hue ko sach maante hai isliye ek serial ko apne pehle ke serials ke major points follow karna padta hai apni TRP keliye aur BR Chopra ne Yudhishthir ko sab chiz ka zimmedar dikhaya kyonki Yudhishthir DharmRaaj hai, unke naam pe dikhane me humare parents ke zamane wale itne sawal nahi karte isliye har ghatna ki safai keliye Yudhishthir ko aage rakhe jahan Yudhishthir the bhi nahi. Khud apna dimag lagaiye ki kyo Pandu Shantanu Vasudev Balram etc kisiko bhi Dharmraaj ka position kyo nahi mila? Kyo inme se kisiko Rishi/Krishna/etc apna Guru nahi maane? Aur Urdu me Mahabharat padhiye samay nikaalke tab aap Mahabharat me sabse zyada izzat Yudhishthir aur unki samajhdariyo ko hi denge sab kirdaro se zyada ye mein guarantee deti hu
Phele pura mahabharat dekho uske baad samajh pao ge sikhandini ko aurat nehi hai.... yudhishthir bilkul sahi hai yaha par dekhte jaao
Sikhandini Aurat hi hain lekin tapasya ke baad wo kinnar ke rup dhare the
Age age dekho krishnaji kya karte hai.thanks for the episodes.continuity rahi aur maja aya.mera ab bhi suzav hai ki aap BR chopraji ki original Mahabharat dekhiye.wo iss se far better hai.