"Neuro-immune interactions in the gut" by Dr. Daniel Mucida

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 4 жов 2024
  • GLOBAL IMMUNOTALK 4-22-20

КОМЕНТАРІ • 11

  • @Elivery
    @Elivery 4 роки тому +7

    4:00 Goals of the series
    11:00 Introducing the speaker + Words from speaker
    15:55 Start of presentation

  • @guipolar9236
    @guipolar9236 4 роки тому +3

    adorei :)

  • @kalicharanhck5367
    @kalicharanhck5367 3 роки тому

    How can I attend these immunotalks??

    • @Benjamin-el9sp
      @Benjamin-el9sp 3 роки тому

      you can use the link here: they just have one zoomlink and I think this is free to everyone.
      labs.biology.ucsd.edu/zuniga/global_immunotalks.htm

  • @zacharypetrover6143
    @zacharypetrover6143 3 роки тому +1

    Why get political???

    • @danielmucida4575
      @danielmucida4575 3 роки тому +3

      ​the choice of silence ("stick to science" argument) is a policial choice. More concerning in the light of these 3 comments here, silence in the period we live in, of climate change denial, anti-vaccine rhetorics is even more concerning. “If you are neutral in situations of injustice, you have chosen the side of the oppressor..." Desmond Tutu

  • @marcrothenberg306
    @marcrothenberg306 3 роки тому +2

    I am concerned that Immunotalks should not become a forum for politics; stick with the science

    • @JacobMartinPhD
      @JacobMartinPhD 3 роки тому +4

      I'm amazed that in 2021 someone could still think that it's possible for politics and science to be separate. The politicians made disrespect of science political. Scientists should not be afraid to speak up.
      Sure, parts of this talk went a bit more political than you'd see in most talks, but it's the speaker's choice. Obviously the immunotalk organizers didn't know he would say those things.

    • @danielmucida4575
      @danielmucida4575 3 роки тому +1

      ​@@JacobMartinPhD Agreed- the choice of silence ("stick to science" argument) is a policial choice. More concerning in the light of these 3 comments here, silence in the period we live in, of climate change denial, anti-vaccine rhetorics is even more concerning. “If you are neutral in situations of injustice, you have chosen the side of the oppressor..." Desmond Tutu

  • @pablopolski1228
    @pablopolski1228 3 роки тому +2

    Very sad that politics seems to permeate even what should be scholarly discussion. Good bye

    • @danielmucida4575
      @danielmucida4575 3 роки тому

      the choice of silence ("stick to science" argument) is a policial choice. More concerning in the light of these 3 comments here, silence in the period we live in, of climate change denial, anti-vaccine rhetorics is even more concerning. “If you are neutral in situations of injustice, you have chosen the side of the oppressor..." Desmond Tutu