I have listened to some of your lectures before. They are excellent. And I want to learn more! Unfortunately, your lectures are not in a language I can understand. Urdu is your main language, but your reach with these videos is global. I would recommend in fact, that you give lectures in English, which you speak so well. That would be of great benefit for all intellectuals in the world.
Please accept this little token of appreciation for providing quality content which sparks excitement into unemployed social sciences graduates like me in these depressing times.
Such clarity is v rare among scholars. I’m doing Phd from Europe n my theoretical framework is based on post modernism n post structuralism. I’m indebted to prof. Taimour to offer the other view point as well which most people now a days don’t talk about. I regard his videos as an asset. Bravo 👍
Best criticism on postmodernism. Absurdism was created by early existentialist philosophers to encounter an existential crisis and question of a meaningless life. And that Absurdism created this postmodernism bullshit. But sir, if we reject this Absurdism how do we solve the most important question of a meaningless life? And how do we create our purpose of life if we believe in objectivity and enlightenment, which is responsible for meaninglessness?
An excellent summary! But perhaps there could be another series that also features what post-structuralism influenced philosophers and writers have contributed in a “constructive” way as well….Bergson’s process philosophy and Edward Said’s Orientalism just to name a few
Please share the Michael Foucault's statement in written. Rest you are doing great. May your knowledge and wisdom increase. A big fan of your Knowledge. Stay blessed 💐❣️
اسلام علیکم استاد محترم۔ گو کہ میری علمی قابلیت اس کی اجازت نہیں دیتی کہ میں آپکو مشورہ دوں اگر طبعیت پر ناگوار گزرے تو معاف فرمائے گا۔ مشورہ یہ ہے کہ آپ جو نئی اصطلاحات کا استعمال کرتے ہیں اگر ان پر اردو زبان میں کوئی کام ہوا ہو تو برائے کرم اس بابت ضرور بتایا کریں تاکہ مجھ جیسا ایک عام طالب علم باآسانی کچھ سیکھ سکے۔ دوسرا مشورہ یہ ہے کہ معروف موضوعات جیسا کہ مارکس ازم سوشلزم کمیونزم لبرلزم یا دوسرے ازم پر اردو زبان میں جو بہتر کتابیں ہوں ان کا ساتھ ساتھ ذکر کیا کریں تاکہ آپ کو سننے والے عام لوگوں کو زیادہ سے زیادہ فائدہ ہو۔ میرے پسندیدہ موضوع کمیونزم سوشلزم اور مارکسزم پر تو ضرور کوئی کتابیں بتائے گا۔ شکریہ
If we study post modernism in depth so we will come across with a link between Iqabal, Foucault and post modernism. post modernism is not nihilism it is not Capitalism. Basically reality, values and meanings are explained by post modernism.
Seems Taimur bhai reads only negative radical marxist interpretations of poststructuralism. It would be best if he would read literature on poststructuralism outside of his comfort zone of like-minded radical marxists. The lecture seems based on a cherry picked picture of poststructuralism. Taimur seems to erect 'straw man' version of poststructuralism only to make it easy for him to attack it. That is a self-serving approach to intellectual debate which does not, in my humbel opinion, suite someone of Taimur's stature.
True. This video is peak example of strawman fallacy. Taimur rehman relates unrelated topics. Forexample , he deems postmodernism and writings of nietzche to be fascist just because the nazi party was inspired by it. Its like saying Islam is a religion of terrorism just because a dude named osama bin laden got inspired by Islam and terrorized the world.
Thanks . Postmodernism seems to strip the universe of its universality . True , its assertion of "little narratives" contains within itself an appeal to empathetically pay heed to what was so far unheard . But its infinite deconstruction of the construct seemingly tends to make an unsolved conundrum of humanity at large .
Do you think that the ridiculous claims of third-wave feminism stem from the sources you have mentioned? Your video on third-wave feminism is on my watchlist.
Feminism has its own sources but there can be no doubt that they are deeply influenced by post-modernism and post-structuralism. The influences of Derrida and Foucault are extremely obvious.
The problem with the dialectics adopted in this address seems to be that Taimur assums as if Derrida, Foucault and others in the 1970s started postructuralism and it is still standing where it was at that time. He seems to reduce the diversity of this movement only to justify his stance that there is a clash between between poststructuralism and marxism (i.e. his favourite brand of marxism). In fact, this is NOT true. Taimur bhai does't talk of 'critical' postructuralists who consider themselves as neo-marxists. He claims 'everything is subjective for postructuralists' which, to put it mildly, is pure nonsense. We may ask Taimur bhai how is it possible for MANY poststructuralists to fight for civil liberty and social justice if they believed that your subjective 'truth' is as much valid as mine. How can there be a 'breed' of critical poststructuralists if the only reality that they subscribed to was individual 'subjective' reality, as Taimur bhai says. The respectable lecturer and his pupils might benefit if Taimur consults literature outside of his favourite radical marxist readings that seem to establish an unresolvable conflict between marxism and postructuralism. That is not factual. Second, he might want to develop his understanding of the differences and similarities between postructuralism and postmodernism--two terms that he seems to equate in a very unproblematic and nonchalant manner (wtih apology from our dear Taimur bhai).
the point still stands. if you're going to deem marxism as "radical" then please leave the door to the left wing is right there. any ideology that wan't to deem it's self as left yet at the same time try to reform the current left is a centerist ideal till it actually manages to gain dominance, which sadly within true academic circles of reasoning it can never establish as it trys to reject the fundamentsals of what it's trying to stand upon and hence a self contradition.
میرا خیال ہے کہ اس موضوع پر مزید بات ہونی چاہیے۔ ابھی بہت سے ایسے موضوعات اور فلسفی باقی ہیں جنہیں آپ نے اردو میں بیان نہیں کئے۔ مثلآ نٹشے، ڈیکارٹ، نرودا وغیرہ۔ جب تک نٹشے کو نہیں سمجھیں گے یہ موضوع مکمل طور پر سمجھ نہیں آئے گا
I am a mechanical engineer and now that I think about it we did study more solid mechanics than fluid omg nust is so sexist god i need to unlearn my degree ew
I am disappointed Taimur, I expected a much better criticism! ...And that paper by Alan mentions the 'Dogma of POST-enlightenment' instead of 'Enlightenment', it's worth mentioning because it defines the character of post-modernism in the philo-scientific paradigm, and along with other(s) I didn't expected you to be manipulative Dr. Rahman. I invite you to dig a bit deeper into postmodernism and I must mention that I am not at all a postmodernist.
![Mod Phil 6: Hegel: Logic and Dialectics [Urdu]](/img/n.gif)
Both these videos are so important because they contextualise what we are studying.
Thank you for arguing so passionately and with humour!
I have listened to some of your lectures before. They are excellent. And I want to learn more! Unfortunately, your lectures are not in a language I can understand. Urdu is your main language, but your reach with these videos is global. I would recommend in fact, that you give lectures in English, which you speak so well. That would be of great benefit for all intellectuals in the world.
Please accept this little token of appreciation for providing quality content which sparks excitement into unemployed social sciences graduates like me in these depressing times.
I m political science student.l see almost all ur videos. Such as philosophy series etc.
Sir plz keep it up.
Thanks
I have read a lot in English to understand post modernism,but your lecture in Urdu cleared it more.please speak the quotation in slow speed.
You are a great intellectual...
Such clarity is v rare among scholars. I’m doing Phd from Europe n my theoretical framework is based on post modernism n post structuralism. I’m indebted to prof. Taimour to offer the other view point as well which most people now a days don’t talk about. I regard his videos as an asset. Bravo 👍
Best criticism on postmodernism.
Absurdism was created by early existentialist philosophers to encounter an existential crisis and question of a meaningless life. And that Absurdism created this postmodernism bullshit. But sir, if we reject this Absurdism how do we solve the most important question of a meaningless life? And how do we create our purpose of life if we believe in objectivity and enlightenment, which is responsible for meaninglessness?
Welldone sir.
Keep it up.
Sir make some videos on political system of the worlds..hope people will like that..
An excellent summary! But perhaps there could be another series that also features what post-structuralism influenced philosophers and writers have contributed in a “constructive” way as well….Bergson’s process philosophy and Edward Said’s Orientalism just to name a few
Please share the Michael Foucault's statement in written. Rest you are doing great. May your knowledge and wisdom increase. A big fan of your Knowledge. Stay blessed 💐❣️
he is probably the only intellectual i found in pakistan who is talking about post mordernism, libralism and other isms
I am coming soon .. :p
@@shreky.singh.sindhu let see some of your "intellectual" work
Love from India....
Not a political science student....
But, addicted to your videos.......
Thanks.
Very much nice video Sir
صوفی محمد اصغر ایم اے فلاسفی گوجرانوالہ
😂😂the best of the best! Post fact world is BS.
U are doing great job.
Thank you sir
I have no idea what you're saying but I like it
اسلام علیکم استاد محترم۔
گو کہ میری علمی قابلیت اس کی اجازت نہیں دیتی کہ میں آپکو مشورہ دوں اگر طبعیت پر ناگوار گزرے تو معاف فرمائے گا۔
مشورہ یہ ہے کہ آپ جو نئی اصطلاحات کا استعمال کرتے ہیں اگر ان پر اردو زبان میں کوئی کام ہوا ہو تو برائے کرم اس بابت ضرور بتایا کریں تاکہ مجھ جیسا ایک عام طالب علم باآسانی کچھ سیکھ سکے۔
دوسرا مشورہ یہ ہے کہ معروف موضوعات جیسا کہ مارکس ازم سوشلزم کمیونزم لبرلزم یا دوسرے ازم پر اردو زبان میں جو بہتر کتابیں ہوں ان کا ساتھ ساتھ ذکر کیا کریں تاکہ آپ کو سننے والے عام لوگوں کو زیادہ سے زیادہ فائدہ ہو۔
میرے پسندیدہ موضوع کمیونزم سوشلزم اور مارکسزم پر تو ضرور کوئی کتابیں بتائے گا۔
شکریہ
Moosa se Marx tak ye parhe
سبط حسن کی یہ کتاب میرے پاس موجود ہے مزید رہنمائی فرمائیں
thanks for the second video
If we study post modernism in depth so we will come across with a link between Iqabal, Foucault and post modernism. post modernism is not nihilism it is not Capitalism. Basically reality, values and meanings are explained by post modernism.
❤
Seems Taimur bhai reads only negative radical marxist interpretations of poststructuralism. It would be best if he would read literature on poststructuralism outside of his comfort zone of like-minded radical marxists. The lecture seems based on a cherry picked picture of poststructuralism. Taimur seems to erect 'straw man' version of poststructuralism only to make it easy for him to attack it. That is a self-serving approach to intellectual debate which does not, in my humbel opinion, suite someone of Taimur's stature.
Agreed
But the topic is why I am not postmodernist. So basically this is a critical analysis.
What about Zizek bro?
His ideas are good or bad?
True. This video is peak example of strawman fallacy. Taimur rehman relates unrelated topics. Forexample , he deems postmodernism and writings of nietzche to be fascist just because the nazi party was inspired by it. Its like saying Islam is a religion of terrorism just because a dude named osama bin laden got inspired by Islam and terrorized the world.
@@digitalcommuneeconomicsphi6149bad. Hes not even a marxist, half the time he parrots pro western imperialist stances
U smile while talking its looks cute
Thanks
Released of the shackles
Kindly tell about the effects of post modernism in literature
Aoa, kindly tusi week vich koi ak program Punjabi zaban vich v zaror start karo, thanks 🙂
you are right. I am also student of philosophy.
سر جدیدیت اور ما بعد جدیدیت کا ادب پر کیا اثرات ہیں۔
Big topic.
The quote you mentioned isn't by Hume but Sokal. :))
Thanks a lot . Your lectures are very thought-provoking . Please go a bit slower that nonUrdu speakers like me can comprehensively follow .
Thanks . Postmodernism seems to strip the universe of its universality . True , its assertion of "little narratives" contains within itself an appeal to empathetically pay heed to what was so far unheard . But its infinite deconstruction of the construct seemingly tends to make an unsolved conundrum of humanity at large .
Lal salam sir
Kya aapne Slavoz zizek ki koe book study ki hain.kyuki video lecture me to sirf "intersting" wala point hi hota hain
it will be great if you add English Subtitle sir.
What is difference between post-modernism and post-structuralism
None
Post Structuralism deals with the deconstruction of language.
Post modernism critiques Modernist categories.
👍👌
Thank sir
اسلام وعلیکم
Boht boht sukriya..
English versions please 😢😢
Do you think that the ridiculous claims of third-wave feminism stem from the sources you have mentioned?
Your video on third-wave feminism is on my watchlist.
Feminism has its own sources but there can be no doubt that they are deeply influenced by post-modernism and post-structuralism. The influences of Derrida and Foucault are extremely obvious.
@@Taimur_Laal exactly, thanks for your response
Sir what was the contribution of lyotard in postmodern thought.
The problem with the dialectics adopted in this address seems to be that Taimur assums as if Derrida, Foucault and others in the 1970s started postructuralism and it is still standing where it was at that time. He seems to reduce the diversity of this movement only to justify his stance that there is a clash between between poststructuralism and marxism (i.e. his favourite brand of marxism). In fact, this is NOT true. Taimur bhai does't talk of 'critical' postructuralists who consider themselves as neo-marxists. He claims 'everything is subjective for postructuralists' which, to put it mildly, is pure nonsense. We may ask Taimur bhai how is it possible for MANY poststructuralists to fight for civil liberty and social justice if they believed that your subjective 'truth' is as much valid as mine. How can there be a 'breed' of critical poststructuralists if the only reality that they subscribed to was individual 'subjective' reality, as Taimur bhai says. The respectable lecturer and his pupils might benefit if Taimur consults literature outside of his favourite radical marxist readings that seem to establish an unresolvable conflict between marxism and postructuralism. That is not factual. Second, he might want to develop his understanding of the differences and similarities between postructuralism and postmodernism--two terms that he seems to equate in a very unproblematic and nonchalant manner (wtih apology from our dear Taimur bhai).
the point still stands. if you're going to deem marxism as "radical" then please leave the door to the left wing is right there. any ideology that wan't to deem it's self as left yet at the same time try to reform the current left is a centerist ideal till it actually manages to gain dominance, which sadly within true academic circles of reasoning it can never establish as it trys to reject the fundamentsals of what it's trying to stand upon and hence a self contradition.
slavoj zizek pe video bana den
👍
Sir is liberation d fun for you
Ap bhi theak ha ma bhi 😆
میرا خیال ہے کہ اس موضوع پر مزید بات ہونی چاہیے۔ ابھی بہت سے ایسے موضوعات اور فلسفی باقی ہیں جنہیں آپ نے اردو میں بیان نہیں کئے۔ مثلآ نٹشے، ڈیکارٹ، نرودا وغیرہ۔ جب تک نٹشے کو نہیں سمجھیں گے یہ موضوع مکمل طور پر سمجھ نہیں آئے گا
Sir I want to set you on front of a man who's in favour of post-modernism
I am a mechanical engineer and now that I think about it we did study more solid mechanics than fluid omg nust is so sexist god i need to unlearn my degree ew
Jawad Zaheer Khan LOL
I'm a post modernist but main ye kahun ga aapne ye bongi maari hai
Allah apko hidyat dy. kis rah chal nikly hain ap
You think I should be a postmodernist?
@@Taimur_Laal you should be what Allah wants you to be sir
I am disappointed Taimur, I expected a much better criticism!
...And that paper by Alan mentions the 'Dogma of POST-enlightenment' instead of 'Enlightenment', it's worth mentioning because it defines the character of post-modernism in the philo-scientific paradigm, and along with other(s) I didn't expected you to be manipulative Dr. Rahman. I invite you to dig a bit deeper into postmodernism and I must mention that I am not at all a postmodernist.
Yes, Taimur, you are very cute but your words are sour.
sorry but the truth is bitter :)
Please give English subtitles
❤🇧🇩
Please do this in English
Sir add subtitles