NASA Announces STAR TREK WARP Engine Powered by Antimatter Changes Everything!

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 25 сер 2024
  • In this jaw-dropping announcement, NASA reveals that they have developed a new engine design that is powered by antimatter!
    This is a HUGE deal, as this new engine will enable space travel at speeds never before possible.
    What does this mean for the future of space exploration? We'll just have to wait and see... But for now, stay tuned to Space.com for all the latest news on this exciting development!
    Subscribe: @techarsenal118

КОМЕНТАРІ • 150

  • @sandiadelsol6011
    @sandiadelsol6011 4 місяці тому +11

    Anti matter is an idea all an idea needs is belief and action. Anti matter is possible with the right team to create warp drive. We need to work together to create warp drive!!

  • @adamkhan7736
    @adamkhan7736 2 місяці тому +6

    I think this artical doesn't talk about warp drive but using antimatter to physically propel space ships close to light speed. I think warp drive is a concept whereby space itself is moved around the spacecraft which would effectively solve the issue of not being able to travel beyond light speed.

  • @toddhubbardguitarmaker
    @toddhubbardguitarmaker 6 місяців тому +10

    Well how do we know if we are matter? What if we are anti-matter? Does it matter?😂

  • @czarcastic1458
    @czarcastic1458 10 місяців тому +33

    NASA can’t even build a space suit or a rocket engine that works

    • @user-ts6vz7rt5i
      @user-ts6vz7rt5i 10 місяців тому

      Thanks to Obama, the Bushes, and all the rest. The USA is now a THIRD RATE science nation. Hell, we probably don't make toilet paper.

    • @joeymurdazalotmore6355
      @joeymurdazalotmore6355 10 місяців тому

      There's that

    • @jpb1231000
      @jpb1231000 10 місяців тому

      Where are they gonna mine them some o that there Anti Matter?

    • @Greenmachine305
      @Greenmachine305 5 місяців тому +5

      Once upon a time, there was a wonderful agency that landed men on the moon.

    • @willedwards7009
      @willedwards7009 2 місяці тому +1

      NASA doesn’t build them. 3rd party contractors do.

  • @noreply5461
    @noreply5461 3 дні тому

    Dude, that is so yesteryear, there is no matter, only data manifested by consciousness.

  • @printerman99
    @printerman99 2 місяці тому +3

    don't forget, Star Trek also uses Dilithium Crystals .

    • @scoodeles
      @scoodeles 2 місяці тому +1

      I don't think that exists well for all we know

    • @printerman99
      @printerman99 2 місяці тому +1

      @@scoodeles I agree, I was just saying that because of what was written "star trek warp drive"

  • @arthurzettel6618
    @arthurzettel6618 8 днів тому

    The stronger the warp field, the faster you go. It's just that simple.
    Warp 1 = 1.50 times light speed
    Warp 1 = 279,000 miles per second
    Warp 2 = 3 times light speed
    Warp 3 = 4.50 times light speed
    Warp 5 = 6 times light speed
    Warp 6 = 7.50 times light speed
    Warp 7 = 9 times light speed
    Warp 7 = 1,674,000 miles per
    second is 47.66 light years traveled in 1.50 years

  • @michaelrobison703
    @michaelrobison703 19 днів тому +1

    1:58 1:59 #tomakemynewelementperiod

  • @yhoda145
    @yhoda145 7 місяців тому +8

    um warp engine do not propel you, they move space around you. Using fuel to propel you isnt a warp engine.

  • @mihaimunteanu6741
    @mihaimunteanu6741 2 місяці тому +1

    Yes we will !! i am optimistic.

  • @michaelrobison703
    @michaelrobison703 19 днів тому +1

    3:43
    #Darkmatteristhecaddelistperiod.

  • @timothyparker9810
    @timothyparker9810 10 місяців тому +6

    Once you have a spaceship going past the speed of light you can scoop up antimatter by the ton

    • @yhoda145
      @yhoda145 7 місяців тому +1

      we first need a warp engine so but if we had an engine that move space around you you wont need fuel to propel you. Warp engines is the only thing that can get you above the speed of light you cant actually propel faster then light because light and physical things and ruled by gravity, warp engines break gravity

  • @thomasgould9055
    @thomasgould9055 2 дні тому

    You to have no second chances on a fuq up with this…

  • @WolfTurner-fb1qf
    @WolfTurner-fb1qf 4 місяці тому +2

    NASA. NEVER A STRAIGHT ANSWER😂😂😂😂😂

  • @Liam22Debono
    @Liam22Debono 10 місяців тому +3

    From stars to .. burgers xD i did not see that coming haha, who else?

  • @borusa32
    @borusa32 3 місяці тому +2

    It's nice to dream but lets focus on sorting our planet out.

    • @schlockmeister754
      @schlockmeister754 Місяць тому

      Touché. Go to other planets and do the same as is being done here? Great idea indeed. 😵‍💫

  • @Fuji-Kengamine
    @Fuji-Kengamine 7 місяців тому +1

    Thank you for your detailed explanation.
    we still have a long way to go in determining what the basics building blocks of matter in the universe are.
    I know a practical method of warp drive
    based on its basic principles.

  • @vanikaghajanyan7760
    @vanikaghajanyan7760 11 днів тому

    In fact, the idea of a warp drives does not stand up to any criticism already within the framework of solutions to Einstein's equations.
    0.Well, what if you really want to but "can't"?
    1.Everything is much simpler: all the bodies on the basis of which starships can be constructed have mass, and therefore a gravitational field.
    2.And if we find out what the gravitational field* is, then we can create a detector that could absorb this field around the entire perimeter of the ship.
    3.It is clear that then the spaceship would become "invisible" to the rest of the gravitational masses and, moreover, the absorbed energy of its own gravitational field can be used to accelerate the ship.
    4.By the way, if we are talking about aliens here, then according to eyewitnesses, their ships are glowing, which can be interpreted as the effect of transforming the UFO's own gravitational field into
    useful energy.
    5.The ship will look like a UFO not only to observers, but also to all gravitational masses: the general background of gravity will perceive the ship as an alien object and will push the "stranger" out of its environment.
    6.Since the background is heterogeneous and not isotropic, the ship’s auto-pilot will be able to assess the situation, maneuver the accumulated energy of the ship's own field and choose the planned route.
    7.It is clear that the accumulated energy and the ejection energy are not negative.
    ----------------
    *) - “Visualization” of space-time is currently possible.
    0.Apparently GR was an
    overlooked QG:
    this assumption follows from the Schwarzschild solution and can be tested experimentally in the laboratory at the moment.
    1.The gravitational radius (or Schwarzschild radius) is a characteristic radius defined for any physical body with mass: r(G)=2GM/c^2.
    Consequently: 2E(0)/r(G)=F(pl)=c^4/G=ε(pl)/r(pl): with indicating the mutual quantization of the mass (energy) and space-time: m(0)/m(pl)=r(G)/2r(pl)=n,where n-total number of quanta of the system; the tension vector flux: n=[(1/4π)(Gћc)^-½]gS ( const for all orbits of the system: n=0,1,2,3....).
    2.Moreover, the parameter r(0)=r(G)-r(pl)=(2n-1)r(pl), defining the interval of the formation of the system, at n=0, when r=r(G)=0 (for example, the state of the "universe" before the Big Bang) turns out to be a quite definite quantity: r(0)=-r(pl).
    In the area [(-rpl) - 0 - (+rpl)] there is an implementation of external forces, "distance": (-rpl)+(+rpl)=0 (≠2rpl).
    3.On the Kruskal diagram of the hyperbole r=0 corresponds to the true Schwarzschild feature, the features V and VI are not even covered by the global (R, T)- space-time and correspond to the "absolute" vacuum; then the singular areas above and below the hyperbolas r=0 can be formally treated as the energy source (external forces).
    That is, the frightening "true singularity" is actually a superconducting heterotrophic "window" between the proto-universe (the source) and physical bodies (not to be confused with wormholes, it's more like grounding from electrical engineering).
    4.As a fundamental theory, GR has the ability with just one parameter: r(G)/r=q to predict, explain new physical effects, and amend already known ones.
    Photon frequency shift in gravitational field Δw/w(0)=q;
    the angle of deflection of a photon from a rectilinear propagation path =2q,
    the Newtonian orbit of the planet shifts forward in its plane: during one revolution, a certain point of the orbit is shifted by an angle =3πq, for a circular orbit (eccentricity е=0); in the case of an elliptical orbit - for example, for perihelion displacement, the last expression must be divided by (1-e^2).
    5.The parameter q is not necessarily a measure of the deviation of the metric from the pseudo-Euclidean one, since in the quantized phase space q=πr/L, where L is the length of the phase path and πr^2=r(G)L.
    6.GR/QG predicts a new physical effect:
    w/w(pl)=q; expression for gravitational radiation from a test body.
    7.This is amenable to physical examination in laboratory conditions at present.
    8.From this, generally, from Einstein's equations, where the constant c^4/G=F(pl), one can obtain a quantum expression (as vibration field) for the gravitational potential: ф(G)=(-1/2)[Għ/с]^½ (w)=-[h/4πm(pl)]w.
    9.Final formula:ф(G)=-[w/w(pl)]c^2/2, where ф(G) - is Newtonian gravitational potential, r(n')=nλ/π=(n+n')2r(pl)l , the corresponding orbital radius, w - the frequency of the quanta of the gravitational field (space-time).
    10.Obviously, the quanta of the field are themselves quantized: λ=(1+n'/n)λ(pl) = 2πc/w, where n'/n=M/2∆m: system gravity unpacking ratio, n'- the orbit number (n'=0,1,2,3…).

  • @smb123211
    @smb123211 27 днів тому +1

    Ridiculous click bait. No "anti-matter" engine is in use or even being designed because, uh, we don't have a nifty little supply of anti-matter.

    • @trwent
      @trwent 22 дні тому +1

      We just need to find some dilithium crystals. 😅

  • @peterpalumbo1963
    @peterpalumbo1963 2 місяці тому +3

    You would need a warp bubble to protect from high g's, much higher than 1g.

    • @crazestyle83
      @crazestyle83 24 дні тому

      Technically, they need an "inertial dampener" like technology. Warp bubbles warp space to propel the ship.

  • @jrluckett
    @jrluckett 2 місяці тому

    What's up with your audio levels?

  • @crazestyle83
    @crazestyle83 24 дні тому

    That title was a variety of click bait. We don't have and can't make antimatter. Also, this video is about using antimatter to propel the ship, not using it to create a warp bubble like Star Trek. Do better. The scientifically interested demographic isn't keen on click bait or being baited and switched or just straight up lied to. Know your audience my guy.

  • @ozzylogano6732
    @ozzylogano6732 23 дні тому

    incredible

  • @metlmickey
    @metlmickey Місяць тому

    Stay where you are in a point in space, move space around YOU

  • @tml721
    @tml721 3 місяці тому

    What isotope would be the best to extract the antimatter from ??

  • @bobpawtucket1336
    @bobpawtucket1336 3 місяці тому

    One problem is in quantum physics only one particle can hit another and the most power that can be applied will accelerate the hit particle to the speed of light . One particle can drive another one to hit another, but their force cannot be combined . You cannot use 2 particles together two get double the force!

  • @arttuvesterinen6984
    @arttuvesterinen6984 23 дні тому

    Michio Kaku spoke, about those matters like he was right there when the bang happened.💥

  • @k9m42
    @k9m42 28 днів тому

    These guys have a big imagination..

  • @brucevennell810
    @brucevennell810 Місяць тому

    Ya rite, now how they going to stop?

  • @lesliegrayson1722
    @lesliegrayson1722 Місяць тому +1

    neil degrasse seems to have a lot of time to talk..

  • @ericmwangigitau3083
    @ericmwangigitau3083 2 місяці тому

    You can use Three Warp drive to provide negative gravity energy from each other they fly together in pattern

  • @scottbuchanan3461
    @scottbuchanan3461 28 днів тому

    This is that same drive system that they forecast will now shock wave destroy their destination must be halted never accelerate a potential calamity of a propulsion drive.

  • @Frenetic74
    @Frenetic74 21 день тому

    I’ll believe the hype when NASA can build a craft that can land on the moon like they supposedly did 60 years ago.

  • @krellesverden
    @krellesverden 4 місяці тому

    what about to mix anti mater and mater?? like in star trek?

  • @swift_learn
    @swift_learn 25 днів тому

    Only 300 year's away

  • @alokranjan2814
    @alokranjan2814 3 місяці тому

    The antimatter extraction possible because in ancient Matrix of Ashtavakra the space craft was common the very civilization was very scientific.

  • @kevinhead6464
    @kevinhead6464 3 місяці тому

    THEY WILL NEED DILITHIUM CRYSTALS.

  • @user-vi3ne4ci3z
    @user-vi3ne4ci3z 2 місяці тому

    Warpdrive ships are a lot around us only we cant see as they are travelling 10x light speed😂

  • @bobpawtucket1336
    @bobpawtucket1336 3 місяці тому

    Just having more power will not give you warp speed ! Being able to bent the time space continuum will! It will require more than brute force to do that brute force applied in the correct manner!

  • @Garmoo5600
    @Garmoo5600 Місяць тому

    You don't have to sustain anti matter, you just got to be able to produce it! A couple second if anti matter will be enough to jump just light years.

  • @jaityrone6306
    @jaityrone6306 15 днів тому

    Ok let's build the Enterprise then and not those cheap rockets

  • @ThomasDronetjr.
    @ThomasDronetjr. 3 місяці тому

    If they start sending this to proxima centauri b then we might encounter Vulcans and star trek will be reality in no time and we will be one with not ufp but the galactic federation of planets

  • @jumpieva
    @jumpieva 28 днів тому

    also 1/10th warp is NOT warp. click bait bs.

  • @tuscancmh
    @tuscancmh 16 днів тому

    Click Bait. Dont bother.

  • @andersholmstrom3571
    @andersholmstrom3571 3 місяці тому

    Absolutely

  • @schlockmeister754
    @schlockmeister754 Місяць тому

    What about space debris at those insane speeds? Honk your horn and tell it to move out of the way? 😆

  • @drumstruck751
    @drumstruck751 3 місяці тому

    What about this Warp Drive? positive charge shell with a negative interior +(-(-(-us)-)-)+ like a russian doll then reverse polarity if the next outer shell +(-(-us)-)+...+(-us)+ opisite charges do you think this has more potential than that one.

  • @user-im7sj7gr2v
    @user-im7sj7gr2v 14 днів тому

    Esta es mi opinion mucho ruido y pocas nueses.

  • @ChaineYTXF
    @ChaineYTXF Місяць тому

    antimass is wrong. Antimatter has normal mass.
    Also: opposite properties but onoy in its quantum state is a sentenve that means nothing.😢

  • @nrich99999
    @nrich99999 3 місяці тому

    lol..... The antimatter bomb will put paid to any ideas of using the substance for sensible things like space travel.
    Therein lies the answer to the Fermi paradox. 🤔

  • @user-zr2js5vs8b
    @user-zr2js5vs8b 7 годин тому

    ❤❤ end of sicence nerd tysu

  • @bernardayala1128
    @bernardayala1128 21 день тому

    Really! How about some magic beans? I will toss in the Brooklyn Bridge! Extreme difficulty in obtaining just a microgram and you would need much more than that. Ridiculous. This is a bull ship story

  • @Invert3148
    @Invert3148 3 місяці тому

    wtf is this clickbait

  • @Greenmachine305
    @Greenmachine305 10 місяців тому +3

    Its videos like this that give serious physicists indigestion.

    • @ANK9936
      @ANK9936 10 місяців тому

      Why’s that? If you’re a physicist and not familiar with antimatter and what it does then I suggest you change your career.

    • @12Corran
      @12Corran 9 місяців тому

      ​@@ANK9936Flat earther...am I right?

    • @TheresaReichley
      @TheresaReichley 6 місяців тому

      Exactly. This is just pseudoscience dressed up as real science. We don’t have much antimatter, and it turns out to be really unstable stuff that’s dangerous to handle. Faster than light travel is impossible, as it breaks causality. NASA is teasing have baked stupidity to legions of idiot Star Trek fans in an attempt to get a bigger share of the budget.

    • @misteroriginal
      @misteroriginal 5 місяців тому

      The video editing really sucks too. They must have been drunk and/or high when they made this video.

  • @billjones4868
    @billjones4868 3 місяці тому

    The only time they ever made anti matter it was 1 tenth of a gram and it only lasted for 10 seconds,so they are not doing this for a very long time and it would cost billions of dollars to make a small amount.

  • @darrinwebber4077
    @darrinwebber4077 3 місяці тому

    Antimatter or whatever....
    If there is a loophole for FTL....
    Well... Humans are good at finding and exploiting loopholes. Just saying.

  • @JohnA000
    @JohnA000 3 місяці тому

    How is it possible for a human body to travel at the speed of light, wouldn't it be torn apart? And even if a ship was travelling that fast, how would it be possible to navigate through space and not hit everything in its path?

    • @SantiUzi
      @SantiUzi 3 місяці тому

      One answer “Computer”

  • @willedwards7009
    @willedwards7009 2 місяці тому

    You are forgetting the apparent mass involved with an object as it accelerates towards the speed of light. Folding space is the closest theory to actual effective travel through the vastness of space.

  • @alokranjan2814
    @alokranjan2814 3 місяці тому

    Indian ancient Epics obtained celestial weapons the very celestial weapons come from the space and during their fly the weapons extracted and collected vivid ranges of celestial rays from the galactic bodies one by one and reached on the Earth to the hands of Divine Gods.

  • @ralphups7782
    @ralphups7782 7 місяців тому

    Japan had it's biggest tsunami, in 2011 at 3.30 pm . 3:43/8:22👈👺👀👀👀👀👉🏃‍♂

  • @yoviandri
    @yoviandri 2 місяці тому

    God already said that HE create his creation in couples! Man-woman, day-night, .... now we just realize: matter-anti matter.

  • @Nothinglefttosay
    @Nothinglefttosay 3 місяці тому

    Ok space rocket genius’s..
    HOW YOU GONNA SLOW DOWN..?

  • @mogeking56
    @mogeking56 12 днів тому

    It’s cool 😎 until you run into a big rock 🪨

  • @profounddamas
    @profounddamas 2 місяці тому

    clickbait

  • @K162KingPin
    @K162KingPin 10 місяців тому +2

    The universe is not full of matter. It might seem like it on earth surrounded by matter, even the air is thick enough with matter that you can feel the wind blow. However when you back away from earth and consider that our universe is almost entirely empty space with a few patches of matter we call galaxies and even those are almost entirely empty space with a few patches we call solar systems, its a pretty empty place. Currently all matter in the Universe makes us less than 0.00000000000000001% of the volume of the universe. The rest is all empty space. This number is shrinking by the day as the space between galaxies continues to expand. So while the total volume of the universe continues to increase exponentially, the amount of matter is slowly reduced as stars burn some of that matter into energy.

    • @ANK9936
      @ANK9936 10 місяців тому +1

      I believe there was a study that came out not long ago that potentially invalidates the observing of the universe expanding. Can’t quite remember exactly what it said though.

    • @K162KingPin
      @K162KingPin 10 місяців тому

      ​@@ANK9936 I have long suspected that it might be bs. There are many widely held scientific theories throughout history which have been completely debunked, the stars are gods, the earth is flat, time dilation, just to name a few. It may be that the universe is expanding, but no one has ever come up with any rational explanation for why, or what power source is fueling the expansion. I mean we are expected to believe that countless galaxies are effectively being propelled faster than the speed of light and ever accelerating but there is no power source behind it? Its a little more than ridiculous. We can't even theoretically propel a single rocket to such speeds without supposedly burning all the matter in the universe plus a little more.

    • @yhoda145
      @yhoda145 7 місяців тому

      dude its not empty space, empty space is full. ever heard of dark matter and dark energy?? space isn't empty. they stopped calling space a vacum cos it isn't a true vacum it has stuff in it stopping it becoming a vacum

  • @ephraimwarrior6766
    @ephraimwarrior6766 2 місяці тому

    B crap there is no way to do this with out hitting stars and other planets

  • @rappersinner
    @rappersinner 22 дні тому +1

    ❤🎉 yes let's go bring are tunes movies and all we need on a tiny sd card and pack my most important stuff tv even if gotta be small ad card for that fat women talk back and forth like we do throughout the world because we get signals from way out there to get sent back to us from cameras so that means we could probably Facebook would be a while before the response would come back. So that sensitive you figure out how long it takes if it's a half hour don't say nothing for a half hour and as soon as a half hour is up alarm goes off and then you start talking so this way when they see it they're responding right back from the movie see it in this place is always a half hour makes it so you get kind of on time

  • @JonAndKatyAnderson
    @JonAndKatyAnderson 10 місяців тому

    It's always fun to see marketing videos about vaporware.

  • @razzer57
    @razzer57 7 місяців тому

    oh come on babies!, when you can create a real thing come to say that, in 3D and imagination all the world can do, even better!!!! pdrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrr

  • @Aurumk1
    @Aurumk1 8 місяців тому

    If we had a time loop that we could control the space of, we could technically (I think) create infinite antimatter for space travel. But that requires higher dimensions or a false dimension if we could ever create one which is a stretch.

  • @carinwiseman4309
    @carinwiseman4309 10 місяців тому +3

    How about making an engine that can go across town without polluting our atmosphere and breaking our wallets.

  • @likwidartsstudios1296
    @likwidartsstudios1296 10 місяців тому +2

    All that money could cure world hunger smh

    • @aleheide9037
      @aleheide9037 10 місяців тому +1

      Must be a mistake in money system ,the belief in money.But travel to other planets can save culture of underpressed ..............and so life.

  • @mark-nm4tc
    @mark-nm4tc 9 місяців тому +1

    I doubt NASA has announced this. Whilst there have been small experiments trying to create tiny little space distortions ('warps') and the Alcubierre Drive has been much debated, we're actually centuries away from one if it can be built at all. We can create and trap a few particles of antimatter but to produce enough for a warp drive (and we still don't quite know exactly how to warp spacetime) would cost trillions of dollars. Nope, warp drives are way, way off.

    • @Aurumk1
      @Aurumk1 8 місяців тому

      Alquiberres drive doesn't work. I have a super vacuum drive that might, but it would require some seriously powerful ships with crazy amounts of technology. Secondly if you could control a space in a higher dimension and time warp it, you could create infinite antimatter through instant time warp aging. Would be a star trek style reactor.

    • @mark-nm4tc
      @mark-nm4tc 8 місяців тому +1

      @@Aurumk1 I think your physics is a little off here. Alcubierre's drive model has been modified, the maths checks out so it should work. Warping spacetime won't create anti matter. Neither will 'time warp ageing' whatever that is?. Time warping is the slowing down or accelerating the passage of time, so where would your energy come from to do that initially?. We have actually created anti matter in particle accelerators. Trouble is, even though we've stored in magnetic fields a few particles of it, the amount needed to power a Star Trek drive (deuterium matter/antimatter fusion) would cost more than the entire GDP of planet Earth, plus take a long time to accumulate.

    • @Aurumk1
      @Aurumk1 8 місяців тому

      from matter antimatter can be captured in a trap. You would send matter to age into antimatter in a containment field to another time. Then when it returns it will have aged sufficiently. However this method would likely require so much energy its retarded in itself. However it might be possible to make one trip and collect a significant amount if antimatter is created in this way.

    • @mark-nm4tc
      @mark-nm4tc 8 місяців тому +1

      @@Aurumk1 Antimatter doesn't 'age' into matter otherwise the universe would be filling up with it. If you sent some matter, ie. yourself, into the future you'd still be just matter.
      Antimatter 101: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Antimatter

    • @Aurumk1
      @Aurumk1 8 місяців тому

      @@mark-nm4tc Yet radioactive decay does produce some antimatter its actually much quicker than I thought as well but the electrons eliminate the antimatter so it doesn't work so well.

  • @aleheide9037
    @aleheide9037 10 місяців тому +1

    Is like bulshit eeg machine it cost money to use it,even wen you already goth it.Well we now money is ilusion .But we like to know way it costs this .

  • @themissingkeyexplainsevery7671
    @themissingkeyexplainsevery7671 14 днів тому

    TAKE IT EASY...............BOW WOW WOA ........IN ORDER TO HAVE WARP DRIVE ,,,YOU NEED TO BE ABLE TO CONTROLL ,,,,SPACE TIME,,,,,,BUT YOU DO UNDERSTAND CLICK BAIT .................HUBA HUBA

  • @user-eq6pi2kx1q
    @user-eq6pi2kx1q 4 місяці тому

    Aunty matter is the wife of Uncle Matter

  • @ticiusarakan
    @ticiusarakan 10 місяців тому

    шляпа! антиматерию надо как я понял ускорять. тарелки то круглые все в основном

  • @scottbuchanan3461
    @scottbuchanan3461 Місяць тому

    As always mankinds not thinking about what they shouldnt and does without question an makes unatural space craft. Their faster than light drive engine they also have .afr a prototype isnt this anacrombe drive.
    The affect to arrivL as was known and they must not travel that way as their deztination is in danger from their forced travel and disobeyance. The negative consequences they know and studied so breaking travel speed and breaking space and places never known, mankinds ignorant and dangerous as if they murder billion unknowingly they dont feel responsible for their lose but their destructive possible and sime certain they do know so they are absolutely guilty of griss misconduct.

  • @jpb1231000
    @jpb1231000 10 місяців тому

    They can't even copy APOLLO nor the RUSSIANS but they can "Create Antimatter SHIPS" ...
    I thought this was a Babylon Bee skit!!!

    • @ANK9936
      @ANK9936 10 місяців тому

      They didn’t create it. They made a concept design that hopefully will be built one day.

  • @geoffreythomas2938
    @geoffreythomas2938 Місяць тому

    From what I understand the difference between matter and antimatter is a mater of the same charges occupying the same space at the same time. In other words the positive electrons of antimatter and positive protons of mater and the negative protons of antimatter and negative the positive electrons of antimatter and the positive protons of mater and the negative electrons of mater and the negative protons of antimatter occupying the same amount space as at the same time. If the law of like repel and unlike attract law is anything to go by mixing like charges occupying the same spaces at the same time would repel each other on a light speed scale. Could it be possible to reverse the forward going inertia accelerating in the forward going accelerating. Instead of pulling back on the acceleration the inertia pulls the acceleration forward in equal amount.

  • @ANK9936
    @ANK9936 10 місяців тому

    So assuming that we get to a point where we can mass produce antimatter, does that mean we can use it for everything like cars and planes and whatnot?!

    • @offroadsnake
      @offroadsnake 8 місяців тому

      What about thunders 😊

  • @jameskovic7146
    @jameskovic7146 2 місяці тому

    This presentation is such a fallacy because right now a team funded by Elon Musk is very well along the way of producing a prototype warp drive engine.
    So what your watching here is produced by those who are treating you like children when they explain all of this.
    They’re working on it; they’ve got the prototype and in 5 years time will need to test it.
    Musk has tentative plans to test it when SpaceX sends the first exploration team to Mars and the STARSHIP will have within it that prototype.
    Ever wonder just why they call it a starship.
    Come on, open your minds, people.
    Go ahead, challenge my seeming crazy assertions. You’re never going to really know anyway. It’s all under wraps and the tightest security.
    But………..I Know!

  • @user-oj8fu4rj3o
    @user-oj8fu4rj3o 29 днів тому

    Yes , I feel this will be used in the near future, BUT It's a Problem only for Someone who does not Think like Most Scientists do. Someone who'll make radical Advancements in the Field. I think Most of your viewers have the same Opinion. But one day Hopefully really soon . We will be able to visit other Galaxies. I Hope I live long enough to see it , even travel in such a Starship , 10? 😊

  • @alokranjan2814
    @alokranjan2814 3 місяці тому

    We are in space exploration and every energy we will extract from space itself, our Earth have limited capacity of energy, we will find numerous things in space that will be beyond our imagination.

  • @mariobartholomew
    @mariobartholomew 2 місяці тому

    Why warp spacetime when we could just travel around it altogether? Not necessarily through wormholes.
    New discoveries at the LHC from particle scattering amplitudes suggest there are geometries beyond spacetime influencing our own. In fact, these new geometries, outside spacetime, reduce the calculation of particle scattering amplitudes to a simple few terms, but when done with classical quantum math inside spacetime, you need a supercomputer. Many physicists now believe and see spacetime itself as not as fundamental as we once thought. It does make sense! The Planck scale, the limit of spacetime, at 10^-33 meters, is NOT incredibly tiny compared to most things in the universe. We also have Nobel Prize-winning experiments proving non-locality - no distance, beyond spacetime - and black hole math hints at something beyond spacetime altogether! Could warping spacetime for traveling through space be our Mickey Mouse thinking, assuming spacetime is fundamental, so we naively try hard to travel through it when we could just go around?

  • @jerrypolverino6025
    @jerrypolverino6025 Місяць тому

    Don’t give a contract to Boeing. Please!

  • @michaelrobison703
    @michaelrobison703 19 днів тому

    1:58 1:59 #tomakemynewelementperiod

  • @user-zr2js5vs8b
    @user-zr2js5vs8b 7 годин тому

    ❤❤ end of sicence nerd tysu