NASA Announces STAR TREK WARP Engine Powered by Antimatter Changes Everything!

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 15 лис 2024

КОМЕНТАРІ • 258

  • @adamkhan7736
    @adamkhan7736 5 місяців тому +14

    I think this artical doesn't talk about warp drive but using antimatter to physically propel space ships close to light speed. I think warp drive is a concept whereby space itself is moved around the spacecraft which would effectively solve the issue of not being able to travel beyond light speed.

  • @42NORRIS
    @42NORRIS 2 місяці тому +14

    So NASA has a warp engine similar to the ones in "Star Trek". Yet is unable to retrieve two astronauts stranded on the ISS? "The math ain't mathin???"🤔

    • @JayeAsakura
      @JayeAsakura Місяць тому +2

      The way I cackled at this comment

    • @RicardoMartinez-oh9sq
      @RicardoMartinez-oh9sq Місяць тому

      Great insight. And forget asking the "evil Russians" to use their ship to retrieve them.

    • @hollyanforth1006
      @hollyanforth1006 6 днів тому

      It was political, first of all, and we can't produce enough antimatter to power anything yet.

  • @sandiadelsol6011
    @sandiadelsol6011 6 місяців тому +18

    Anti matter is an idea all an idea needs is belief and action. Anti matter is possible with the right team to create warp drive. We need to work together to create warp drive!!

    • @RicardoMartinez-oh9sq
      @RicardoMartinez-oh9sq Місяць тому

      It may take decades to reach the least results. Particularly when the priority of the world is not scientific advancement but useless wars.

  • @smb123211
    @smb123211 3 місяці тому +10

    Ridiculous click bait. No "anti-matter" engine is in use or even being designed because, uh, we don't have a nifty little supply of anti-matter.

    • @trwent
      @trwent 3 місяці тому +2

      We just need to find some dilithium crystals. 😅

    • @scottbuchanan3461
      @scottbuchanan3461 2 місяці тому +1

      They have a one third operating prototype to test fly with a crew which had been disclosed over the last twelve years. All experimental!
      Much about it I dont know as they never do good careful considerations any more.

    • @printerman99
      @printerman99 Місяць тому +1

      This story literally just said they are creating anti matter.

    • @CatsClaw44
      @CatsClaw44 Місяць тому +2

      Actually we do have anti-matter just not nearly enough of it.

    • @scottbuchanan3461
      @scottbuchanan3461 28 днів тому

      @@smb123211 what's worse about these abucrim e type drives derived from a discover and now 25 years later less power needed, but the concern is its displaced when it travels. We don't want it to fly past our sun and displace it so mankind can go somewhere faster where there never supposed to or allowed.
      Like their sciences they know and have and show absolutely no restraint. Everything does to DARPA to make a freezing weapon if anything then they pass it back to labs if corporations.
      When Bib Lazar helped design their understanding that became the tr3b and HE wisely said where are the pilots and I can ask them some questions maybe....
      Punished for asking about the welfare of other races seems to be the norm if all their practices and ignorance a. Bushes and Reagan's proclaim the wouldn't it be GOID if the planet had enemy's everywhere from anywhere and to unify in absolute ignorance and be hostile in benevolent a better than we. This is their protocol they call their space force culture, be aware. Remember 911 was an inside job for a psychopath to get his hands in his military's kept weapons from convention use and abuse.
      Bush talking point about a thousand tiny little lites is the limit of his vision and also very very delusional!

  • @Yhoda.PsyTrakked
    @Yhoda.PsyTrakked 9 місяців тому +13

    um warp engine do not propel you, they move space around you. Using fuel to propel you isnt a warp engine.

  • @DavidJensen-tu5zp
    @DavidJensen-tu5zp Місяць тому +2

    The title for this flick is click bait and a blatant lie.

  • @toddhubbardguitarmaker
    @toddhubbardguitarmaker 8 місяців тому +15

    Well how do we know if we are matter? What if we are anti-matter? Does it matter?😂

    • @petersigurdson618
      @petersigurdson618 3 місяці тому +1

      Tomato / Tom-at-ohh

    • @luthermcgee3767
      @luthermcgee3767 2 місяці тому +2

      If we are antimatter, then we must hope against hope that we never meet matter.

    • @wkh4321music
      @wkh4321music 2 місяці тому

      Sounds like something Philomena Cunk might say.

  • @Fuji-Kengamine
    @Fuji-Kengamine 9 місяців тому +2

    Thank you for your detailed explanation.
    we still have a long way to go in determining what the basics building blocks of matter in the universe are.
    I know a practical method of warp drive
    based on its basic principles.

  • @timothyparker9810
    @timothyparker9810 Рік тому +10

    Once you have a spaceship going past the speed of light you can scoop up antimatter by the ton

    • @Yhoda.PsyTrakked
      @Yhoda.PsyTrakked 9 місяців тому +3

      we first need a warp engine so but if we had an engine that move space around you you wont need fuel to propel you. Warp engines is the only thing that can get you above the speed of light you cant actually propel faster then light because light and physical things and ruled by gravity, warp engines break gravity

    • @andraj.chambersiii1636
      @andraj.chambersiii1636 Місяць тому

      @@Yhoda.PsyTrakked nice thinking but wrong

  • @commonwealthoperative7354
    @commonwealthoperative7354 Місяць тому +1

    It (antimatter engines) may happen hundreds of years into the future. But right now if we are serious about exploring the solar system, we need something more powerful than chemical rockets. We also need some part of the space craft to rotate to produce gravity and a shelter against solar flares and radiation. Right now it would be impossible for humans to explore Jupiter space because of all the radiation.

  • @Liam22Debono
    @Liam22Debono Рік тому +3

    From stars to .. burgers xD i did not see that coming haha, who else?

  • @arttuvesterinen6984
    @arttuvesterinen6984 3 місяці тому +4

    Michio Kaku spoke, about those matters like he was right there when the bang happened.💥

    • @fireiadmire5189
      @fireiadmire5189 2 місяці тому

      😂😂😂

    • @printerman99
      @printerman99 2 місяці тому

      @@arttuvesterinen6984 at one time, he also said warp speed was impossible.

    • @andraj.chambersiii1636
      @andraj.chambersiii1636 Місяць тому +1

      Bet he never even see a ufo in person, so what would he know?

  • @JuanMelendez-l9f
    @JuanMelendez-l9f Місяць тому

    Before getting a matter and antimatter engine for warp speed, we must find out how to generate artificial gravity waves to equip spaceships with a livable inner environment. So Kirk, Spock, and Scotty have a lot of work to do. We also need the support of Zulu to navigate, Uhura for communications, and Dr MCoy for healthcare. Live long and prosper.

  • @WolfTurner-fb1qf
    @WolfTurner-fb1qf 7 місяців тому +4

    NASA. NEVER A STRAIGHT ANSWER😂😂😂😂😂

  • @printerman99
    @printerman99 5 місяців тому +4

    don't forget, Star Trek also uses Dilithium Crystals .

    • @scoodeles
      @scoodeles 4 місяці тому +1

      I don't think that exists well for all we know

    • @printerman99
      @printerman99 4 місяці тому +1

      @@scoodeles I agree, I was just saying that because of what was written "star trek warp drive"

    • @luthermcgee3767
      @luthermcgee3767 2 місяці тому +1

      Wouldn't dilithium crystals generate the magnetic field that would separate the matter from the antimatter?

    • @scottbuchanan3461
      @scottbuchanan3461 2 місяці тому

      Right and lithium is what they spray thiousands of pounds every day in our upper and lower atmosphere also disclosed and now done by Gates as was given the air force contract publicly disclosed, also remote flown craft tech.

    • @printerman99
      @printerman99 2 місяці тому +1

      @@luthermcgee3767 I don't really remember the science of it. I thought that when matter ani-matter collided, it created the energy needed for warp power

  • @borusa32
    @borusa32 6 місяців тому +2

    It's nice to dream but lets focus on sorting our planet out.

  • @andraj.chambersiii1636
    @andraj.chambersiii1636 Місяць тому +2

    This is mis-and dis- information. We already have vehicles that travels faster than light speed. It’s just not for you to know… yet. Think A.R.V.

  • @metlmickey
    @metlmickey 3 місяці тому

    Stay where you are in a point in space, move space around YOU

  • @Frenetic74
    @Frenetic74 3 місяці тому

    I’ll believe the hype when NASA can build a craft that can land on the moon like they supposedly did 60 years ago.

  • @tml721
    @tml721 5 місяців тому

    What isotope would be the best to extract the antimatter from ??

  • @mihaimunteanu6741
    @mihaimunteanu6741 5 місяців тому +1

    Yes we will !! i am optimistic.

  • @noreply5461
    @noreply5461 2 місяці тому

    Dude, that is so yesteryear, there is no matter, only data manifested by consciousness.

  • @MsJohnnycash
    @MsJohnnycash 13 днів тому

    Antimatter can be harvested from the rays and lightning on top of the clauds

  • @RicardoMartinez-oh9sq
    @RicardoMartinez-oh9sq Місяць тому

    Like Star Trek but forget the intergalactic wars with green skinned non-human monsters: We are alone, folks.

  • @krellesverden
    @krellesverden 7 місяців тому

    what about to mix anti mater and mater?? like in star trek?

  • @Lochanfss
    @Lochanfss 5 місяців тому

    Warpdrive ships are a lot around us only we cant see as they are travelling 10x light speed😂

  • @crazestyle83
    @crazestyle83 3 місяці тому

    That title was a variety of click bait. We don't have and can't make antimatter. Also, this video is about using antimatter to propel the ship, not using it to create a warp bubble like Star Trek. Do better. The scientifically interested demographic isn't keen on click bait or being baited and switched or just straight up lied to. Know your audience my guy.

  • @alokranjan2814
    @alokranjan2814 6 місяців тому

    The antimatter extraction possible because in ancient Matrix of Ashtavakra the space craft was common the very civilization was very scientific.

  • @rrrobinson97202
    @rrrobinson97202 Місяць тому

    Inverse gravity propulsion travel speed is near the speed of light some say but the speed of gravity is still being researched.

  • @arthurzettel6618
    @arthurzettel6618 3 місяці тому

    The stronger the warp field, the faster you go. It's just that simple.
    Warp 1 = 1.50 times light speed
    Warp 1 = 279,000 miles per second
    Warp 2 = 3 times light speed
    Warp 3 = 4.50 times light speed
    Warp 5 = 6 times light speed
    Warp 6 = 7.50 times light speed
    Warp 7 = 9 times light speed
    Warp 7 = 1,674,000 miles per
    second is 47.66 light years traveled in 1.50 years

    • @scottbuchanan3461
      @scottbuchanan3461 2 місяці тому

      Nothing is simple but truth in simplest form are eternal . It is more than simple thought and love and carefulness that humans cant engineer but surely would profess to have ability, like all partial claims by them. nothing they do was their own idea but devinely inspired to careful thought.As Tesla would dream and ponder and in exactness could machine and make is and was his only unique gifts just as everyone has their own unique gifts.

  • @peterpalumbo1963
    @peterpalumbo1963 5 місяців тому +4

    You would need a warp bubble to protect from high g's, much higher than 1g.

    • @crazestyle83
      @crazestyle83 3 місяці тому

      Technically, they need an "inertial dampener" like technology. Warp bubbles warp space to propel the ship.

    • @andraj.chambersiii1636
      @andraj.chambersiii1636 Місяць тому +2

      There are no G’s while traveling like that.

    • @Authenticnerd123
      @Authenticnerd123 Місяць тому

      Exactly. They act like experts don't understand how warp bubble works​@@andraj.chambersiii1636

  • @ericmwangigitau3083
    @ericmwangigitau3083 5 місяців тому

    You can use Three Warp drive to provide negative gravity energy from each other they fly together in pattern

  • @bobpawtucket1336
    @bobpawtucket1336 5 місяців тому

    One problem is in quantum physics only one particle can hit another and the most power that can be applied will accelerate the hit particle to the speed of light . One particle can drive another one to hit another, but their force cannot be combined . You cannot use 2 particles together two get double the force!

  • @luthermcgee3767
    @luthermcgee3767 2 місяці тому

    All i can say, is if they are able to create this in a LHC, they'd better be certain, not sure, but certain that they know what theyre doing because 1 particle coming into contact with any matter can bring about a chain reaction. If that chain reaction has no way of duplicating itself, well, that chain reaction has a limited range. If it dose however have a way of repeating itself ( which is improbable) it can destroy everything. Even dust particals in the airless vaccume of space.

  • @quinton3997
    @quinton3997 Місяць тому

    Even if it's possible how do you miss hitting a astroid at speed of light

  • @GregoryHammerstein-i7k
    @GregoryHammerstein-i7k Місяць тому

    Ever hear of zomby matter ,well you take a partical of matter and strip it's positive electron away and replace it with a neutron then collide it with a iridium atom at 98 percent the speed of light you have a stable antimatter partical .

  • @42NORRIS
    @42NORRIS Місяць тому +1

    10% the speed of light would astonishing!.....for us, but compared to Star Trek where starships travel hundreds and thousands times faster than the speed of light its unimpressive.🤷‍♀️

    • @Tark0r
      @Tark0r Місяць тому

      The Problem is we Don't have stronger Material :/

  • @sgbermudez102
    @sgbermudez102 18 днів тому

    there so many sources sustainable and natural energy around the earth.

  • @Garmoo5600
    @Garmoo5600 3 місяці тому

    You don't have to sustain anti matter, you just got to be able to produce it! A couple second if anti matter will be enough to jump just light years.

  • @jrluckett
    @jrluckett 5 місяців тому

    What's up with your audio levels?

  • @myrio1
    @myrio1 Місяць тому

    Warping space is a much more prcatical approach!

  • @willedwards7009
    @willedwards7009 5 місяців тому

    You are forgetting the apparent mass involved with an object as it accelerates towards the speed of light. Folding space is the closest theory to actual effective travel through the vastness of space.

  • @vanikaghajanyan7760
    @vanikaghajanyan7760 3 місяці тому

    In fact, the idea of a warp drives does not stand up to any criticism already within the framework of solutions to Einstein's equations.
    0.Well, what if you really want to but "can't"?
    1.Everything is much simpler: all the bodies on the basis of which starships can be constructed have mass, and therefore a gravitational field.
    2.And if we find out what the gravitational field* is, then we can create a detector that could absorb this field around the entire perimeter of the ship.
    3.It is clear that then the spaceship would become "invisible" to the rest of the gravitational masses and, moreover, the absorbed energy of its own gravitational field can be used to accelerate the ship.
    4.By the way, if we are talking about aliens here, then according to eyewitnesses, their ships are glowing, which can be interpreted as the effect of transforming the UFO's own gravitational field into
    useful energy.
    5.The ship will look like a UFO not only to observers, but also to all gravitational masses: the general background of gravity will perceive the ship as an alien object and will push the "stranger" out of its environment.
    6.Since the background is heterogeneous and not isotropic, the ship’s auto-pilot will be able to assess the situation, maneuver the accumulated energy of the ship's own field and choose the planned route.
    7.It is clear that the accumulated energy and the ejection energy are not negative.
    ----------------
    *) - “Visualization” of space-time is currently possible.
    0.Apparently GR was an
    overlooked QG:
    this assumption follows from the Schwarzschild solution and can be tested experimentally in the laboratory at the moment.
    1.The gravitational radius (or Schwarzschild radius) is a characteristic radius defined for any physical body with mass: r(G)=2GM/c^2.
    Consequently: 2E(0)/r(G)=F(pl)=c^4/G=ε(pl)/r(pl): with indicating the mutual quantization of the mass (energy) and space-time: m(0)/m(pl)=r(G)/2r(pl)=n,where n-total number of quanta of the system; the tension vector flux: n=[(1/4π)(Gћc)^-½]gS ( const for all orbits of the system: n=0,1,2,3....).
    2.Moreover, the parameter r(0)=r(G)-r(pl)=(2n-1)r(pl), defining the interval of the formation of the system, at n=0, when r=r(G)=0 (for example, the state of the "universe" before the Big Bang) turns out to be a quite definite quantity: r(0)=-r(pl).
    In the area [(-rpl) - 0 - (+rpl)] there is an implementation of external forces, "distance": (-rpl)+(+rpl)=0 (≠2rpl).
    3.On the Kruskal diagram of the hyperbole r=0 corresponds to the true Schwarzschild feature, the features V and VI are not even covered by the global (R, T)- space-time and correspond to the "absolute" vacuum; then the singular areas above and below the hyperbolas r=0 can be formally treated as the energy source (external forces).
    That is, the frightening "true singularity" is actually a superconducting heterotrophic "window" between the proto-universe (the source) and physical bodies (not to be confused with wormholes, it's more like grounding from electrical engineering).
    4.As a fundamental theory, GR has the ability with just one parameter: r(G)/r=q to predict, explain new physical effects, and amend already known ones.
    Photon frequency shift in gravitational field Δw/w(0)=q;
    the angle of deflection of a photon from a rectilinear propagation path =2q,
    the Newtonian orbit of the planet shifts forward in its plane: during one revolution, a certain point of the orbit is shifted by an angle =3πq, for a circular orbit (eccentricity е=0); in the case of an elliptical orbit - for example, for perihelion displacement, the last expression must be divided by (1-e^2).
    5.The parameter q is not necessarily a measure of the deviation of the metric from the pseudo-Euclidean one, since in the quantized phase space q=πr/L, where L is the length of the phase path and πr^2=r(G)L.
    6.GR/QG predicts a new physical effect:
    w/w(pl)=q; expression for gravitational radiation from a test body.
    7.This is amenable to physical examination in laboratory conditions at present.
    8.From this, generally, from Einstein's equations, where the constant c^4/G=F(pl), one can obtain a quantum expression (as vibration field) for the gravitational potential: ф(G)=(-1/2)[Għ/с]^½ (w)=-[h/4πm(pl)]w.
    9.Final formula:ф(G)=-[w/w(pl)]c^2/2, where ф(G) - is Newtonian gravitational potential, r(n')=nλ/π=(n+n')2r(pl)l , the corresponding orbital radius, w - the frequency of the quanta of the gravitational field (space-time).
    10.Obviously, the quanta of the field are themselves quantized: λ=(1+n'/n)λ(pl) = 2πc/w, where n'/n=M/2∆m: system gravity unpacking ratio, n'- the orbit number (n'=0,1,2,3…).

  • @michalhogen6467
    @michalhogen6467 Місяць тому +1

    nice animations are thouse real or onlly television films....

  • @bnjm8868
    @bnjm8868 Місяць тому

    While antiparticles exist in 4D space antiparticles do not naturally come together to form antimatter. Antiprotons are antiparticles, not antimatter. Antiparticles form antimatter. Theoretically, antimatter forms and exists in extra dimensions of space.
    If the antihekium was in the dorm of a gas then that would be antimatter. For particles larger than atoms is matter and antiparticles larger than anti atoms is antimatter.

  • @Greenmachine305
    @Greenmachine305 Рік тому +3

    Its videos like this that give serious physicists indigestion.

    • @ANK9936
      @ANK9936 Рік тому

      Why’s that? If you’re a physicist and not familiar with antimatter and what it does then I suggest you change your career.

    • @12Corran
      @12Corran Рік тому

      ​@@ANK9936Flat earther...am I right?

    • @TheresaReichley
      @TheresaReichley 9 місяців тому

      Exactly. This is just pseudoscience dressed up as real science. We don’t have much antimatter, and it turns out to be really unstable stuff that’s dangerous to handle. Faster than light travel is impossible, as it breaks causality. NASA is teasing have baked stupidity to legions of idiot Star Trek fans in an attempt to get a bigger share of the budget.

    • @misteroriginal
      @misteroriginal 7 місяців тому

      The video editing really sucks too. They must have been drunk and/or high when they made this video.

  • @jaizen334
    @jaizen334 2 місяці тому

    What fuel atom smasher?

  • @billjones4868
    @billjones4868 6 місяців тому

    The only time they ever made anti matter it was 1 tenth of a gram and it only lasted for 10 seconds,so they are not doing this for a very long time and it would cost billions of dollars to make a small amount.

  • @marccleroux4020
    @marccleroux4020 Місяць тому

    I think that to travel at warp, it would be necessary to vibrate the atoms or particles of the ship and everything onboard at or near the opposite of their resonance frequencies to reduce they're atomic mass to reduce inertia.

  • @Nottherebutthere
    @Nottherebutthere Рік тому +3

    How about making an engine that can go across town without polluting our atmosphere and breaking our wallets.

  • @darrinwebber4077
    @darrinwebber4077 6 місяців тому

    Antimatter or whatever....
    If there is a loophole for FTL....
    Well... Humans are good at finding and exploiting loopholes. Just saying.

  • @K162KingPin
    @K162KingPin Рік тому +2

    The universe is not full of matter. It might seem like it on earth surrounded by matter, even the air is thick enough with matter that you can feel the wind blow. However when you back away from earth and consider that our universe is almost entirely empty space with a few patches of matter we call galaxies and even those are almost entirely empty space with a few patches we call solar systems, its a pretty empty place. Currently all matter in the Universe makes us less than 0.00000000000000001% of the volume of the universe. The rest is all empty space. This number is shrinking by the day as the space between galaxies continues to expand. So while the total volume of the universe continues to increase exponentially, the amount of matter is slowly reduced as stars burn some of that matter into energy.

    • @ANK9936
      @ANK9936 Рік тому +1

      I believe there was a study that came out not long ago that potentially invalidates the observing of the universe expanding. Can’t quite remember exactly what it said though.

    • @K162KingPin
      @K162KingPin Рік тому

      ​@@ANK9936 I have long suspected that it might be bs. There are many widely held scientific theories throughout history which have been completely debunked, the stars are gods, the earth is flat, time dilation, just to name a few. It may be that the universe is expanding, but no one has ever come up with any rational explanation for why, or what power source is fueling the expansion. I mean we are expected to believe that countless galaxies are effectively being propelled faster than the speed of light and ever accelerating but there is no power source behind it? Its a little more than ridiculous. We can't even theoretically propel a single rocket to such speeds without supposedly burning all the matter in the universe plus a little more.

    • @Yhoda.PsyTrakked
      @Yhoda.PsyTrakked 9 місяців тому

      dude its not empty space, empty space is full. ever heard of dark matter and dark energy?? space isn't empty. they stopped calling space a vacum cos it isn't a true vacum it has stuff in it stopping it becoming a vacum

  • @GigaHuxpin
    @GigaHuxpin Місяць тому

    Wait.... Anti matter is the opposite of matter meaning it doesn't exist at all really, so how can you contain it in matter huh?

  • @thomasgould9055
    @thomasgould9055 2 місяці тому

    You to have no second chances on a fuq up with this…

  • @brucevennell810
    @brucevennell810 3 місяці тому

    Ya rite, now how they going to stop?

  • @michaelrobison703
    @michaelrobison703 3 місяці тому +1

    3:43
    #Darkmatteristhecaddelistperiod.

  • @JohnA000
    @JohnA000 6 місяців тому

    How is it possible for a human body to travel at the speed of light, wouldn't it be torn apart? And even if a ship was travelling that fast, how would it be possible to navigate through space and not hit everything in its path?

    • @SantiUzi
      @SantiUzi 5 місяців тому

      One answer “Computer”

  • @czarcastic1458
    @czarcastic1458 Рік тому +42

    NASA can’t even build a space suit or a rocket engine that works

    • @OctavianDrew
      @OctavianDrew Рік тому

      Thanks to Obama, the Bushes, and all the rest. The USA is now a THIRD RATE science nation. Hell, we probably don't make toilet paper.

    • @joeymurdazalotmore6355
      @joeymurdazalotmore6355 Рік тому

      There's that

    • @jpb1231000
      @jpb1231000 Рік тому

      Where are they gonna mine them some o that there Anti Matter?

    • @Greenmachine305
      @Greenmachine305 7 місяців тому +10

      Once upon a time, there was a wonderful agency that landed men on the moon.

    • @willedwards7009
      @willedwards7009 5 місяців тому +2

      NASA doesn’t build them. 3rd party contractors do.

  • @RJS1966USMC
    @RJS1966USMC Місяць тому

    Unless you are moving the fabric of space-time around you, thus avoiding messy things like G-forces on your human crew, it will never work for human space flight. (No magical "inertia dampeners" i.e CONVENIENT PLOT DEVICE)

  • @andersholmstrom3571
    @andersholmstrom3571 6 місяців тому

    Absolutely

  • @gerardocomas450
    @gerardocomas450 Місяць тому

    Getting tired of seeing videos of “Will make a Warp Drive like in Star Trek”. Such videos like this one are known as “clickbait’s”. We rather to see videos of a real warp drive with a real starship. My prediction of such a real warp drive may happen in after 2030.

  • @mrliberty8468
    @mrliberty8468 2 місяці тому

    The mater antimatter drive is about to explode captin an I dunno what to do..

  • @Nothinglefttosay
    @Nothinglefttosay 6 місяців тому

    Ok space rocket genius’s..
    HOW YOU GONNA SLOW DOWN..?

  • @jaizen334
    @jaizen334 2 місяці тому

    Cancel the cost and keep creating anti matter,engine that constantly smashing atoms

  • @ozzylogano6732
    @ozzylogano6732 3 місяці тому

    incredible

  • @bobpawtucket1336
    @bobpawtucket1336 5 місяців тому

    Just having more power will not give you warp speed ! Being able to bent the time space continuum will! It will require more than brute force to do that brute force applied in the correct manner!

  • @scottbuchanan3461
    @scottbuchanan3461 3 місяці тому

    This is that same drive system that they forecast will now shock wave destroy their destination must be halted never accelerate a potential calamity of a propulsion drive.

  • @davidroberts5602
    @davidroberts5602 Місяць тому

    It would be nice to use some these things in reality not, fora couple of countries yet David ❤❤

  • @ThomasDronetjr.
    @ThomasDronetjr. 5 місяців тому

    If they start sending this to proxima centauri b then we might encounter Vulcans and star trek will be reality in no time and we will be one with not ufp but the galactic federation of planets

  • @drumstruck751
    @drumstruck751 6 місяців тому

    What about this Warp Drive? positive charge shell with a negative interior +(-(-(-us)-)-)+ like a russian doll then reverse polarity if the next outer shell +(-(-us)-)+...+(-us)+ opisite charges do you think this has more potential than that one.

  • @yoviandri
    @yoviandri 4 місяці тому

    God already said that HE create his creation in couples! Man-woman, day-night, .... now we just realize: matter-anti matter.

  • @michaelrobison703
    @michaelrobison703 3 місяці тому

    1:58 1:59 #tomakemynewelementperiod

  • @k9m42
    @k9m42 3 місяці тому

    These guys have a big imagination..

  • @jaityrone6306
    @jaityrone6306 3 місяці тому

    Ok let's build the Enterprise then and not those cheap rockets

  • @mark-nm4tc
    @mark-nm4tc Рік тому +1

    I doubt NASA has announced this. Whilst there have been small experiments trying to create tiny little space distortions ('warps') and the Alcubierre Drive has been much debated, we're actually centuries away from one if it can be built at all. We can create and trap a few particles of antimatter but to produce enough for a warp drive (and we still don't quite know exactly how to warp spacetime) would cost trillions of dollars. Nope, warp drives are way, way off.

    • @Aurumk1
      @Aurumk1 11 місяців тому

      Alquiberres drive doesn't work. I have a super vacuum drive that might, but it would require some seriously powerful ships with crazy amounts of technology. Secondly if you could control a space in a higher dimension and time warp it, you could create infinite antimatter through instant time warp aging. Would be a star trek style reactor.

    • @mark-nm4tc
      @mark-nm4tc 11 місяців тому +1

      @@Aurumk1 I think your physics is a little off here. Alcubierre's drive model has been modified, the maths checks out so it should work. Warping spacetime won't create anti matter. Neither will 'time warp ageing' whatever that is?. Time warping is the slowing down or accelerating the passage of time, so where would your energy come from to do that initially?. We have actually created anti matter in particle accelerators. Trouble is, even though we've stored in magnetic fields a few particles of it, the amount needed to power a Star Trek drive (deuterium matter/antimatter fusion) would cost more than the entire GDP of planet Earth, plus take a long time to accumulate.

    • @Aurumk1
      @Aurumk1 11 місяців тому

      from matter antimatter can be captured in a trap. You would send matter to age into antimatter in a containment field to another time. Then when it returns it will have aged sufficiently. However this method would likely require so much energy its retarded in itself. However it might be possible to make one trip and collect a significant amount if antimatter is created in this way.

    • @mark-nm4tc
      @mark-nm4tc 11 місяців тому +1

      @@Aurumk1 Antimatter doesn't 'age' into matter otherwise the universe would be filling up with it. If you sent some matter, ie. yourself, into the future you'd still be just matter.
      Antimatter 101: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Antimatter

    • @Aurumk1
      @Aurumk1 11 місяців тому

      @@mark-nm4tc Yet radioactive decay does produce some antimatter its actually much quicker than I thought as well but the electrons eliminate the antimatter so it doesn't work so well.

  • @kevinhead6464
    @kevinhead6464 6 місяців тому

    THEY WILL NEED DILITHIUM CRYSTALS.

  • @wilcosmit7278
    @wilcosmit7278 10 днів тому

    sopit,god is king

  • @jpb1231000
    @jpb1231000 Рік тому

    They can't even copy APOLLO nor the RUSSIANS but they can "Create Antimatter SHIPS" ...
    I thought this was a Babylon Bee skit!!!

    • @ANK9936
      @ANK9936 Рік тому

      They didn’t create it. They made a concept design that hopefully will be built one day.

  • @lesliegrayson1722
    @lesliegrayson1722 3 місяці тому +1

    neil degrasse seems to have a lot of time to talk..

  • @ChaineYTXF
    @ChaineYTXF 4 місяці тому

    antimass is wrong. Antimatter has normal mass.
    Also: opposite properties but onoy in its quantum state is a sentenve that means nothing.😢

  • @David-c8y7u
    @David-c8y7u 6 місяців тому

    Aunty matter is the wife of Uncle Matter

  • @swift_learn
    @swift_learn 3 місяці тому

    Only 300 year's away

  • @rogerferris2377
    @rogerferris2377 Місяць тому

    Dilithium crystals power anti matter

  • @nrich99999
    @nrich99999 5 місяців тому

    lol..... The antimatter bomb will put paid to any ideas of using the substance for sensible things like space travel.
    Therein lies the answer to the Fermi paradox. 🤔

  • @likwidartsstudios1296
    @likwidartsstudios1296 Рік тому +2

    All that money could cure world hunger smh

    • @aleheide9037
      @aleheide9037 Рік тому +1

      Must be a mistake in money system ,the belief in money.But travel to other planets can save culture of underpressed ..............and so life.

  • @lawrencecaines214
    @lawrencecaines214 18 днів тому

    First One has to learn about Humanity and what greed will get you, and then technology will be allowed to go to the stars, there are people on earth who are too greedy, and if the knowledge falls into the wrong hands it could be hazardous to mankind. we have to all learn to walk before we can touch the stars . . . . . . . .

  • @harutyungrigoryan2291
    @harutyungrigoryan2291 2 місяці тому +1

    l don't believe :)

  • @alokranjan2814
    @alokranjan2814 6 місяців тому

    Indian ancient Epics obtained celestial weapons the very celestial weapons come from the space and during their fly the weapons extracted and collected vivid ranges of celestial rays from the galactic bodies one by one and reached on the Earth to the hands of Divine Gods.

  • @tuscancmh
    @tuscancmh 3 місяці тому

    Click Bait. Dont bother.

  • @bernardayala1128
    @bernardayala1128 3 місяці тому

    Really! How about some magic beans? I will toss in the Brooklyn Bridge! Extreme difficulty in obtaining just a microgram and you would need much more than that. Ridiculous. This is a bull ship story

  • @JonAndKatyAnderson
    @JonAndKatyAnderson Рік тому

    It's always fun to see marketing videos about vaporware.

  • @Aurumk1
    @Aurumk1 11 місяців тому

    If we had a time loop that we could control the space of, we could technically (I think) create infinite antimatter for space travel. But that requires higher dimensions or a false dimension if we could ever create one which is a stretch.

  • @jumpieva
    @jumpieva 3 місяці тому

    also 1/10th warp is NOT warp. click bait bs.

    • @scottbuchanan3461
      @scottbuchanan3461 2 місяці тому

      Its actually what they had called the aburcrombe drive experiment. they think it might not destroy where is goes to see as just another experiment.

  • @mogeking56
    @mogeking56 3 місяці тому

    It’s cool 😎 until you run into a big rock 🪨

  • @ralphups7782
    @ralphups7782 10 місяців тому

    Japan had it's biggest tsunami, in 2011 at 3.30 pm . 3:43/8:22👈👺👀👀👀👀👉🏃‍♂

  • @rappersinner
    @rappersinner 3 місяці тому +1

    ❤🎉 yes let's go bring are tunes movies and all we need on a tiny sd card and pack my most important stuff tv even if gotta be small ad card for that fat women talk back and forth like we do throughout the world because we get signals from way out there to get sent back to us from cameras so that means we could probably Facebook would be a while before the response would come back. So that sensitive you figure out how long it takes if it's a half hour don't say nothing for a half hour and as soon as a half hour is up alarm goes off and then you start talking so this way when they see it they're responding right back from the movie see it in this place is always a half hour makes it so you get kind of on time

  • @BenjaminHarness-j2k
    @BenjaminHarness-j2k 2 місяці тому

    ❤❤ end of sicence nerd tysu

  • @geoffreythomas2938
    @geoffreythomas2938 3 місяці тому

    From what I understand the difference between matter and antimatter is a mater of the same charges occupying the same space at the same time. In other words the positive electrons of antimatter and positive protons of mater and the negative protons of antimatter and negative the positive electrons of antimatter and the positive protons of mater and the negative electrons of mater and the negative protons of antimatter occupying the same amount space as at the same time. If the law of like repel and unlike attract law is anything to go by mixing like charges occupying the same spaces at the same time would repel each other on a light speed scale. Could it be possible to reverse the forward going inertia accelerating in the forward going accelerating. Instead of pulling back on the acceleration the inertia pulls the acceleration forward in equal amount.

  • @themissingkeyexplainsevery7671
    @themissingkeyexplainsevery7671 3 місяці тому

    TAKE IT EASY...............BOW WOW WOA ........IN ORDER TO HAVE WARP DRIVE ,,,YOU NEED TO BE ABLE TO CONTROLL ,,,,SPACE TIME,,,,,,BUT YOU DO UNDERSTAND CLICK BAIT .................HUBA HUBA

  • @RamonMedina-j6q
    @RamonMedina-j6q 3 місяці тому

    Esta es mi opinion mucho ruido y pocas nueses.