YongNuo 42.5 1.7M II vs Panasonic 42.5 1.7 (m43) - How to prononce YongNuo?

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 16 жов 2024

КОМЕНТАРІ • 39

  • @TheRealRichardWong
    @TheRealRichardWong  3 роки тому +12

    Little fun fact about this review: When I filmed this review a week ago, I pronounced "Yongnuo" incorrectly. So after they told me the correct pronunciation, I decided to film it again so i can say their name correctly.

    • @xiaoamy5172
      @xiaoamy5172 3 роки тому

      zeapon zhiyun 😂😂

    • @TheRealRichardWong
      @TheRealRichardWong  3 роки тому +1

      @@xiaoamy5172 hahaha tell me the official pronunication of Zeapon BEFORE i film my next video please :D

    • @xiaoamy5172
      @xiaoamy5172 3 роки тому

      @@TheRealRichardWong 🤣🤣

    • @TerenceKearns
      @TerenceKearns 2 роки тому

      Wow. That's dedication. I'm impressed. Also, good job looking after reviews for the low end of the market. Expensive gear is exciting, but it's not as relevant to most of us.

  • @VoicesofMusic
    @VoicesofMusic 3 роки тому +4

    The Panasonic is not only a better buy, it's a steal. And, it's sharp on Super 35 at 6K. No comparison. A gem.

    • @MidWestMTB
      @MidWestMTB Рік тому

      Hell yeah, that's going to look amazing when compressed to shit on youtube and instagram!

    • @Studiotek
      @Studiotek 4 місяці тому

      Super 35? It's an MFT lens

    • @333_studios
      @333_studios 4 місяці тому

      Does the image circle really cover S35?

    • @Studiotek
      @Studiotek 3 місяці тому

      @@333_studios If you use electronic stabilization, the crop should make it pretty close to covered.

  • @joecarey7123
    @joecarey7123 3 роки тому +6

    I picked up a Yongnuo 42.5, as a low risk option. It's as good (or close to) as the non-pro grade lenses. I don't shoot video, so noise is not an issue. I found it sharp enough for my needs and will most likely buy the 25mm. The price though!

    • @TheRealRichardWong
      @TheRealRichardWong  3 роки тому +2

      Joe is your the original or the mark Ii version? And yes I agree most of the downside are not a problem if you are only shooting photos

    • @joecarey7123
      @joecarey7123 3 роки тому +3

      @@TheRealRichardWong I bought the Mark 2. I saw a mk 1 review by Rob Trek and it was less than flattering. Good to see the company took the critiques on-board and fixed them. I like the idea of the af/mf switch on the lens. It means I don't need to fiddle.around the menu. Focus peaking kicks in automatically, if set. I'm very pleased with it.

    • @TheRealRichardWong
      @TheRealRichardWong  3 роки тому +2

      Good point about the focus switch. Yes I didn't have a chance to play with the original version but this new version works OK overall. The 25mm works slightly better than this one.

  • @noopynnus
    @noopynnus 2 роки тому +3

    Watching this video 12 hrs after winning an eBay auction for the Lumix 42.5mm f/1.7… haha!

  • @TerenceKearns
    @TerenceKearns 2 роки тому +5

    so basically Panasonic has no excuse for pricing this lens the way that they do. Good job YongNuo for honest pricing.

  • @ablemediaproductions
    @ablemediaproductions Рік тому +3

    Thanks for the review Richard. I think the Yongnuo is great value. As for autofocus I am sure you'll get a much better result on a GH5 II or GH6. I own a G85 and while I love the camera I have to admit that autofocus in video mode is definitely not one of its strengths with any lens.

  • @okimurafranck7672
    @okimurafranck7672 Рік тому +1

    as always the best reviews thanks buddy which lesn shuld i by for this lens Lumix or Olympus

  • @artistjoh
    @artistjoh Рік тому +1

    The O.I.S. and close focusing make the Lumix lens the standout choice for me.

  • @mia-to7wy
    @mia-to7wy 2 роки тому +2

    i would go for the YongNuo 42.5 1.7M thanks for the review Richard Wong

  • @izzieb
    @izzieb 3 роки тому +6

    Focus tracking on Panasonic cameras isn't slow, it's "cinematic".

    • @TheRealRichardWong
      @TheRealRichardWong  3 роки тому

      Thanks for watching! I can't wait to see what the gh6 can do, and maybe retest lens like this Yongnuo

  • @tobiasnickel3750
    @tobiasnickel3750 Рік тому +1

    would you say that the yongnuo is a better fit with cheaper cameras because, it makes much less a percentage of the complete camera setup. and for panasonic 400$ do not have much weight when using a g9 or gh6.

    • @TheRealRichardWong
      @TheRealRichardWong  Рік тому +1

      I think it really depends on your preference. Some people like to spend less on body and more on the lenses. Some people like to spend the minimum amount of money no matter buying body or lens

  • @ezrakoper
    @ezrakoper 3 роки тому +3

    What about testing it against Olympus 45 mm f1.7? Panasonic auto focus for video is known to be very bad. So it would be much more interesting to test the two lenses on olympus EM1-III

    • @TheRealRichardWong
      @TheRealRichardWong  3 роки тому +2

      Hi Erza, thanks for watching and suggestions! Unfortunately I don't have access to the Olympus gear at the moment, especially during a max level lockdown here that even all restaurants are closed.

  • @tobiasnickel3750
    @tobiasnickel3750 Рік тому +2

    one more question, does the panasonic lens image stabilization also works on cameras not from panasonic? so can it bring some stabilization to cheaper/older cameras?

  • @tonyhafaka3524
    @tonyhafaka3524 3 роки тому +3

    Nice review 👍 I might consider the yong nuo as I don't need video autofocus

  • @actstuntcam
    @actstuntcam 3 роки тому +1

    Great thorough review. Thanks, Richard. Cheers, Campbell :)

  • @liutony4872
    @liutony4872 2 місяці тому

    I can get the Lumix for about $280 nowadays, you get OIS and dual-IS on Panasonic body, definitely worth it.

  • @yeahyeahyaha2
    @yeahyeahyaha2 2 роки тому +1

    Excellent review. Many thanks!

  • @SteveSacramento
    @SteveSacramento 2 роки тому +1

    Thank you very much for this very detailed review!!

  • @fandysetiawanprayogo5171
    @fandysetiawanprayogo5171 Рік тому

    Very helpfull review