More on elasticity of demand | Elasticity | Microeconomics | Khan Academy

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 26 лис 2024

КОМЕНТАРІ • 38

  • @ibraced1243
    @ibraced1243 6 років тому +87

    For those who didn't understand look at it this way, if you wanted to buy a house, and its initial price was 300,009$ and it raised by 2$ i.e it became 300,011$, will that have a strong impact on your will to buy the house? i think it won't but what if you wanted to buy a pack of gums and it's price was 2$ and it was raised to 4$, now will you consider buying it again or not. This is exactly what elasticity is about, how a change of the % price will affect demand

  • @ProDarkHunter16
    @ProDarkHunter16 12 років тому +8

    I have just learned in these 19 mins (with previous video included) more then I did in 2, 1.5hr lectures with my prof. U are amazing!

  • @shakaama
    @shakaama 12 років тому +23

    ok so by video 18 I am now able to understand 75% of my study guide, where before it was literally like trying to read hieroglyphic quantum physics.

  • @wingbliss
    @wingbliss 12 років тому +4

    Thank you! I can't say enough of thanks! You video has help me understand elasticity which seems SO complicated. I didn't know why we had to divide by average and I am amazed you can make it easier to understand. Thank you.

  • @raypraise
    @raypraise 7 років тому +3

    Thanks again Khan! Studying for my CLEP exam..

  • @star4u146
    @star4u146 2 роки тому +2

    THANK YOU KHAN ACADEMY

  • @Krs759
    @Krs759 11 років тому +15

    you're the best! thank you

  • @donepudiaditya8236
    @donepudiaditya8236 6 років тому +4

    You are my God

  • @ja543543
    @ja543543 11 років тому +17

    Look at the views in the first video and second. Thinking in clear statistic you can calculate that about 50k people shot themselfs after the first one xD

    • @rycrump
      @rycrump 15 днів тому

      Boom. Thanks for that laugh.

  • @akshatsgupta895
    @akshatsgupta895 8 місяців тому +1

    Everything is clear but why is the average taken when it is clearly % change in quantity demanded ie new Q - old Q/ old Q * 100

  • @moustafachleilat6485
    @moustafachleilat6485 6 років тому +1

    Very, very helpful thank you so much!

  • @nawabpoya
    @nawabpoya 7 років тому +1

    thanks a lot Khan academy

  • @naimapervaiz9258
    @naimapervaiz9258 6 років тому

    very well explained. thanks a lot

  • @HelenRawrBaby
    @HelenRawrBaby 8 років тому +1

    can you do a video on calculating the elasticity of demand with the total outlay method?? it's much simpler

  • @dirtbikeboyz
    @dirtbikeboyz 13 років тому +2

    what would each of these mean for a company that wants to raise its prices?

  • @catherinefinley1241
    @catherinefinley1241 9 років тому +3

    So what is the intuitive reasoning here?Like why do the consumers tend to become unresponsive as output is higher and price is lower?

    • @iagosoriano3734
      @iagosoriano3734 9 років тому +13

      +Catherine Finley I believe it is because as price is already very low, people are buying almost as much of that product as they want, consurmers are already getting almost as much as they would get if the products were free. That's why a small change in price doesn't make people rush to stores to get more, because they are nearly satisfied already.

    • @catherinefinley1241
      @catherinefinley1241 9 років тому +2

      +Iago Soriano Oh yeah, that makes sense, thank you.:)

  • @arjunnannvasanthakumaran134
    @arjunnannvasanthakumaran134 4 роки тому +2

    this not khan some American teacher

  • @AdenoidHynkelThe2nd
    @AdenoidHynkelThe2nd 13 років тому +2

    last

  • @Donflip30
    @Donflip30 11 років тому

    LOL, nice one ja

  • @piprod01
    @piprod01 12 років тому

    Is this actually telling us something interesting about economics? Or is it just saying that's just how percentages work? All I really get from this is the rather obvious fact that with an amount change if you apply it to a big number then it far less of a change than if you apply it to a smaller number.

  • @Kelpy
    @Kelpy 10 років тому +3

    you should discuss the trends here, instead of focusing so early and in such a detailed way on the math, this is supposed to be helping us understand the dynamces of economics, and instead it is a detailed lesson in arithmetic -- unusually bad video for Kahn, just like the prior one

    • @dylanjcrow4856
      @dylanjcrow4856 9 років тому +20

      Kelpy Completely disagree. He is teaching mostly to people who will need to know both the concepts AND the math. Both are important, and he does a good job at explaining both.

    • @amansrivastava8978
      @amansrivastava8978 7 років тому +1

      I too believe that he should be more focused on drawing conclusions and giving out the bottom line.

    • @dylanjcrow4856
      @dylanjcrow4856 7 років тому +3

      i don't care what you believe

  • @uniconism
    @uniconism 13 років тому

    last

  • @444zane3
    @444zane3 13 років тому

    last