Hi Joe, Delighted to see you taking on a Stuart engine ! Just one word to the wise : The drawings were produced in a time when things were “fitted” together, before the advent of tolerances, necessitated by the largely American influences of mass production . . . . Dimensions were given in fractions, with guidance been given in words, for example 23/32” bare would be a few thousands undersize and 23/32” full would be a few thousands oversize. The quality of fit would largely be left to the judgement of the machinist. If I were starting to construct one of these models, I would create a general arrangement drawing from all of the dimensioned parts, and see how well they all fit together . . . . “An hour in the drawing office is worth a week in the shop”, as my old boss would have said . . . . Over 50+ years of reading the Model Engineer, there have been more than a few wailings and gnashings of teeth in those pages, on the subject of Stuart’s dimensional inaccuracies . . . . However, I have every confidence in your intuitive expertise to “get things right” Good luck on your journey ! Steve A
Fantastic - what a generous gift. Stuart Models started in 1898, so the approach to model engine plans hearks back to days when paper was super expensive so they (Stuart Models) crammed as much information onto one sheet as they could, and that practice continues today in the model engineering world. Makes for a bit of an adventure interpreting the plans sometimes - and it's down to the model engineer to figure out the tolerances and fits! I'm very pleased to see this kick off and will be avidly following. Cheers!
I reckon I'd start by making a CAD drawing of all the moving parts to calculate appropriate shaft, bearing and cylinder (etc) diameters, tolerances etc. PPPPPPP! 😅
Indeed - that’s a solid approach and rewarding in its own right. 👍 I usually just look at the assembly and work out what is doing what and apply tolerances as appropriate. These days I am very much into training engineers in GD and T so I try to think about it in those terms.
I learnt in school (around 2010) that good drawings should give all the information needed with the least amount of views, in order to avoid clutter and useless complications. And I think that drawing parts that goes together as one in sub-assemblies will give a quick and clear idea of how they will relate to each other
That's the difference between model engineering plans and manufacturing drawings. That aspect of multiple parts in one part of the plans does indeed help the plans describe intent for the parts in the assembly. In the manufacturing world we require all information needed to define the part, including tolerances, finish, material, size and shape to be on the piece part drawing (per ASME Y14.5 or BS8888) - so that there is no need for interpretation. There are a great many very successful model engineers who never even see the inside of a manufacturing facility - so two different worlds with a bit of an overlap.
This will be an interesting build and it will provide an impressive amount of power when completed. I built the Stuart Marine Twin which is very similar and it really does sound glorious running loaded and on steam. The BA thread system is a curious one. It follows a geometric progression with each size downwards being 9/10ths the next size upwards. It does scale really well which is why it is used for model engines. It is still possible to buy hex headed bolts and nuts in BA sizes. The castings that support the cylinders are called "trunk guides" but they are also the structural connection between the cylinders and the base frame for the engine. Regards, Mark
I'll have to enjoy this build vicariously, my accountant has me on a strict budget. The basic kit is not too pricey, at about 310 usd, but add the reverse gears and finish pipework, and it's over $550, and then there's paint and so on. That's a generous gift, indeed. And it's a gift to the entire community, as we get the benefit of Joe's instruction, which I can currently afford...
Mr Steve Bright is a most generous gentleman. This is a wonderful gift. I am certain that you will do justice by it, during it's fabrication and construction. Please do not presume what is boring to me. I am most interested all aspects of your projects. Your filing technique and the tools used are just as interesting. Some of the filing on that fly wheel in real time would have been most appreciated. Your work can only be boring if you do repetitive operations more than three times. For instance if you have to bore ten holes. After the first three I think most of us get the idea. Show the first two or three and mention you did the same on the remainder. I am a woodworker and I turn bowls on a lathe. As such all your work is fascinating to me. Not ever boring. Thank you for sharing. Have a great day and stay safe.🙂🙂
Many thanks to Steve Bright for sending you the kits. I'm really looking forward to the build. Another opportunity to watch, learn and enjoy you build something. I'm glad that Steve send this model as it will challenge you on a more complex engine, while not taking anything away from the PMR build. Maybe some of you viewers will help you get a proper boiler to run the steam engines. What ever boiler will have to meet the Texas code for boilers, but I'm sure your viewers will come through for you.
I like seeing how to do things right. And then there is how I do them, but I'm learning and enjoying it. Always amazed by Joe's enthusiasm and positive attitude.
My D10 partially machined kit has been sitting on the shelf for around 40 years. I may be inspired to follow along to finish it. I see they have made a few changes in the kit since I got mine.
Hi Joe, looking forward to seeing this progress. I would be surprised if there is any metric on a Stuart drawing. Imperial fractional dimensions with BA (British Association) hardware is normally how they go. BA were mainly used for instrumentation and electrical fittings and dates back to the 1800's. Cheers, Jon
I am so excited for this build. I have a completed factory machined D10 and attempted to fit it with the reversing gear. I can’t wait til you get to the reversing gear to see how it’s done. I’ll still enjoy the build of the engine because I want to build the V10. Supposedly you can build the V10 with only a lathe, maybe the D10 as well. Are you up to the challenge?
Stuart Models are great. Castings were good back in the day. This should be fun. The one I built was all BA threads back in the early 80's. the one I built was a single horizontal 10 I think. I want to build that one you have and add a reverse gear. Someday maybe!
Beautiful sweat job on the piping and great finishing work. You received a very nice gift to start this project. But having watched you for some time now, I know you will take it to the next level and above. You are not just a machinist but actually a genius in the shop. Love watching your talent and learning from it. Thank you Joe for sharing all your knowledge with us. Have a blessed day.
When I was building a "tiny power Ajax" steam engine, I bought an MLA die filer kit and it does a masterful job for all that flash and cleaning up raw castings. I've had that filer for close to twenty years and pull it out for any casting or substantial filing job. One of the best most useful tools I've ever made. I still enjoy watching others build steam engines, and sometimes find myself buying another kit out of envy! Always interesting to watch you work, Joe.
I have the single cylinder version. It is a stunningly beautiful model with the full reversing gear fitted. I believe the part with the two legs is called the "Standard". The brass parts are now cnc machined but were originally stamped in the older kits. I've got the original drawings and they are very different. I'll see if I can email you a photo. This will be another great series.
Good luck Joe. No doubt You'll make it a beautiful model. Looking forward to lots of interesting clamping, milling and turning. Restoring parts on a 1957 rail car and steam parts on a 1917 locomotive is more my call these days...
I've been making drawings for machining and fabrication for 32 years. I can't make heads or tails of that 2.6.15 drawing section. That's three parts? holy cow. Good luck on this one Joe. lol
Going to be wonderful seeing this built by you, Its quite large in comparison to the miniature machine tools you have made previously, your detail workmanship is out standing no guessing or using your trained eye just pure accuracy. Thank you Mr Steve Bright for this wonderful gift you have given too Joe for us all to enjoy.
I have watched Keith Appleton build and repair these D10s and many other steam engines, on his UA-cam channel for a long time. Once built there are a few tricky valve timing adjustments to do to get it running smoothly, but it shouldn't be anything you can't handle. I think you should have a fun time building this Stewart D10.
Every time I see Keith machine parts I cringe...using wooden blocks for parallels, going to the belt grinder instead of the milling machine. Will be nice to see Joe machine the parts for this engine properly.
@@jackpledger8118 Keith always tells us he is not an engineer(machinist), but he seems to to do okay. Maybe a little ham-fisted, but he gets it done. He also knows the ins and outs of all of these model steam engines.
@@sfeddie1 he keeps telling people he is showing the wrong way, like when he silver solders and uses too much to show how not to do something but sometimes I wonder if he knows how to do things in a proficient manner. His use of a micrometer is a constant source of amusement to even the newblest of newbies. He does produce the goods though, by hook or by crook, so one should criticise too much.
Joe, you are a lucky man. I just purchased this setup and you’re looking at right around $700 US not including the price of the taps and dies. You do a fantastic job with your videos. Thanks for your dedication.
Watching this series with great interest Joe, I *started* machining a D10 about a year ago which I need to finish at some point... Looking forward to seeing your unique take on some of the challenges! 🇬🇧
If you should find oddities in the plans or parts that you might think an American would not put up with remember these sorts of kits are mostly built by brits of a certain age with a more "make do and mend" attitude lift over from the '40s and '50s. Not saying a kit should be Inferior, just a slight difference of attitude. Looking forward to this series and your perfectionism, something we should all aim for.
The use of BA fixings is because whilst electrical in origin, they look right at these scales where the original would have been Whitworth. Good work, looking forward to the series.
As an Australian who went to college in America I can tell you metric confuses all Americans. Its the French spelling and division by 10 that gets them. Go and watch Jim Gaffigan on what metric means to Americans.
Oh hell to the yah!!!!!! Not only is this a Stuart engine model but it’s done by “The Pie”!!! This is going to be good. BYW: mixed measurements are nothing new. Just redid my Cummins dodge clutch. Some of its metric and some of it is imperial. Just need to be aware and consistent. Any whitworth threads in this beastie? Did I mention that this is going to be good!
The teardrop file is sometimes called out as 'teardrop' in catalogs, pippin is the formal name. Handy to know when shopping for them. If one oft he sides is slightly rounded rather than flat, there are other names I can't recall.
Anyone else want to see him set up a overhead pulley shaft for this to power his miniature machines?
Yesssss!!!
Absolutely!
Sure do and build a dynamo to light the machine shop he will build to house them in OK I stopped taking the medication 😂
I think we all do! 😁😁
Ha ha! That was my first thought when I saw the video thumbnail. 😊
Hi Joe,
Delighted to see you taking on a Stuart engine !
Just one word to the wise :
The drawings were produced in a time when things were “fitted” together, before the advent of tolerances, necessitated by the largely American influences of mass production . . . .
Dimensions were given in fractions, with guidance been given in words, for example 23/32” bare would be a few thousands undersize and 23/32” full would be a few thousands oversize. The quality of fit would largely be left to the judgement of the machinist.
If I were starting to construct one of these models, I would create a general arrangement drawing from all of the dimensioned parts, and see how well they all fit together . . . .
“An hour in the drawing office is worth a week in the shop”, as my old boss would have said . . . .
Over 50+ years of reading the Model Engineer, there have been more than a few wailings and gnashings of teeth in those pages, on the subject of Stuart’s dimensional inaccuracies . . . .
However, I have every confidence in your intuitive expertise to “get things right”
Good luck on your journey !
Steve A
Fantastic - what a generous gift. Stuart Models started in 1898, so the approach to model engine plans hearks back to days when paper was super expensive so they (Stuart Models) crammed as much information onto one sheet as they could, and that practice continues today in the model engineering world. Makes for a bit of an adventure interpreting the plans sometimes - and it's down to the model engineer to figure out the tolerances and fits! I'm very pleased to see this kick off and will be avidly following. Cheers!
I reckon I'd start by making a CAD drawing of all the moving parts to calculate appropriate shaft, bearing and cylinder (etc) diameters, tolerances etc. PPPPPPP! 😅
Indeed - that’s a solid approach and rewarding in its own right. 👍 I usually just look at the assembly and work out what is doing what and apply tolerances as appropriate. These days I am very much into training engineers in GD and T so I try to think about it in those terms.
I learnt in school (around 2010) that good drawings should give all the information needed with the least amount of views, in order to avoid clutter and useless complications. And I think that drawing parts that goes together as one in sub-assemblies will give a quick and clear idea of how they will relate to each other
That's the difference between model engineering plans and manufacturing drawings. That aspect of multiple parts in one part of the plans does indeed help the plans describe intent for the parts in the assembly. In the manufacturing world we require all information needed to define the part, including tolerances, finish, material, size and shape to be on the piece part drawing (per ASME Y14.5 or BS8888) - so that there is no need for interpretation. There are a great many very successful model engineers who never even see the inside of a manufacturing facility - so two different worlds with a bit of an overlap.
And the next binge worthy build series begins!
Hand work isn't boring, it's content and we're happy to get it no matter what it is. 👍👍
This will be an interesting build and it will provide an impressive amount of power when completed. I built the Stuart Marine Twin which is very similar and it really does sound glorious running loaded and on steam. The BA thread system is a curious one. It follows a geometric progression with each size downwards being 9/10ths the next size upwards. It does scale really well which is why it is used for model engines. It is still possible to buy hex headed bolts and nuts in BA sizes. The castings that support the cylinders are called "trunk guides" but they are also the structural connection between the cylinders and the base frame for the engine.
Regards,
Mark
Thank you Joe Pie for taking the time to make these kits for us. You are a true master at your craft sir.
I'll have to enjoy this build vicariously, my accountant has me on a strict budget. The basic kit is not too pricey, at about 310 usd, but add the reverse gears and finish pipework, and it's over $550, and then there's paint and so on. That's a generous gift, indeed. And it's a gift to the entire community, as we get the benefit of Joe's instruction, which I can currently afford...
This was a very generous and totally unexpected gift.
And another adventure begins 👍 !
This is a build I am seriously looking forward to!!!
You are going to love this project. #10 is a great design. All Stuart kits are fabulous to work.
Mr Steve Bright is a most generous gentleman. This is a wonderful gift. I am certain that you will do justice by it, during it's fabrication and construction. Please do not presume what is boring to me. I am most interested all aspects of your projects. Your filing technique and the tools used are just as interesting. Some of the filing on that fly wheel in real time would have been most appreciated. Your work can only be boring if you do repetitive operations more than three times. For instance if you have to bore ten holes. After the first three I think most of us get the idea. Show the first two or three and mention you did the same on the remainder. I am a woodworker and I turn bowls on a lathe. As such all your work is fascinating to me. Not ever boring. Thank you for sharing. Have a great day and stay safe.🙂🙂
Many thanks to Steve Bright for sending you the kits. I'm really looking forward to the build. Another opportunity to watch, learn and enjoy you build something. I'm glad that Steve send this model as it will challenge you on a more complex engine, while not taking anything away from the PMR build. Maybe some of you viewers will help you get a proper boiler to run the steam engines. What ever boiler will have to meet the Texas code for boilers, but I'm sure your viewers will come through for you.
I would call those a-shaped castings stanchions. That's my story anyway... Thanks for the video Joe; looks like another very interesting project.
I like seeing how to do things right. And then there is how I do them, but I'm learning and enjoying it. Always amazed by Joe's enthusiasm and positive attitude.
My D10 partially machined kit has been sitting on the shelf for around 40 years. I may be inspired to follow along to finish it. I see they have made a few changes in the kit since I got mine.
Can’t wait to see you build this, Joe! Very kind of Mr. Bright to provide you that set of castings and materials!
Hi Joe, looking forward to seeing this progress. I would be surprised if there is any metric on a Stuart drawing. Imperial fractional dimensions with BA (British Association) hardware is normally how they go. BA were mainly used for instrumentation and electrical fittings and dates back to the 1800's. Cheers, Jon
I think Joe was confusing metric with decimal inches (0.000"), which _was_ present on the drawing.
Nothing better than a steam engine kit build!
Looking forward to this one Joe
I can't wait to see how you set these parts up to finish them. I always learn a lot when you machine castings.
I am so excited for this build. I have a completed factory machined D10 and attempted to fit it with the reversing gear. I can’t wait til you get to the reversing gear to see how it’s done. I’ll still enjoy the build of the engine because I want to build the V10. Supposedly you can build the V10 with only a lathe, maybe the D10 as well. Are you up to the challenge?
I can only imagine when it's done , Joe. As with everything else you make, it will look absolutely beautiful. Very nice gift!
Just came back from Ireland with a 10V, 10H, and oscillator kits, and eager to watch this series!
I hope it helps guide your thoughts.
Looks like another great project for the master model maker.
OoooooWeeeee! This is going to be GREAT!!!!! Love watching you do your magic!!!!!! Can’t wait to see this project come together!
Stuart Models are great. Castings were good back in the day. This should be fun. The one I built was all BA threads back in the early 80's. the one I built was a single horizontal 10 I think. I want to build that one you have and add a reverse gear. Someday maybe!
Thank you Joe can’t wait to follow along on this journey
G'day from Australia, Looking forward to following along with this build series.
I am hooked on these models and your skill of assembling them
awesome! thisnone was realy missing in your videos ! thanks to mr. Bright!
Beautiful sweat job on the piping and great finishing work. You received a very nice gift to start this project. But having watched you for some time now, I know you will take it to the next level and above. You are not just a machinist but actually a genius in the shop. Love watching your talent and learning from it. Thank you Joe for sharing all your knowledge with us. Have a blessed day.
When I was building a "tiny power Ajax" steam engine, I bought an MLA die filer kit and it does a masterful job for all that flash and cleaning up raw castings. I've had that filer for close to twenty years and pull it out for any casting or substantial filing job. One of the best most useful tools I've ever made. I still enjoy watching others build steam engines, and sometimes find myself buying another kit out of envy! Always interesting to watch you work, Joe.
Great to see you, Joe, start another project. 👍 John 🇬🇧
I will be following this series closely, as I want to make a large-scale model for a boat project.
Wonderful gift... LOT of work ahead, including many tiny bits! Nice file work on the flywheel.
Hello Mr. Chris!
Hello Mr. Danny :)
I have the single cylinder version. It is a stunningly beautiful model with the full reversing gear fitted. I believe the part with the two legs is called the "Standard". The brass parts are now cnc machined but were originally stamped in the older kits. I've got the original drawings and they are very different. I'll see if I can email you a photo. This will be another great series.
A couple of people have commented on the thread angle of BA threads it is 47.5 degrees.
Years ago I was shown plans from England and they love to use fraction , they do amazing work on their models for sure .
cool.. a new project.. looking forward to watching
No chips no fun!! Good start! I will keep an eye for this serie for sure.
Watch those steam chest covers Joe... they were well chilled on the S50 I built. Looking forward to this one!
That is a very interesting project and thanks for the generosity of Mr. Steve Bright
Looking forward to seeing this build progress. Always admire your precision with small parts and ingenuity with machining methods
Looking forward to another quality build.
Good luck Joe. No doubt You'll make it a beautiful model. Looking forward to lots of interesting clamping, milling and turning.
Restoring parts on a 1957 rail car and steam parts on a 1917 locomotive is more my call these days...
Really chuffed, to see ya building another steam engine 👍👌😉
Nice file work, Joe. Anticipating an enjoyable viewing experience with this project!
You have a lot of work ahead of you mate. I will watch it when I can
I've been making drawings for machining and fabrication for 32 years. I can't make heads or tails of that 2.6.15 drawing section. That's three parts? holy cow.
Good luck on this one Joe. lol
I shall watch with interest. I am a complete novice and have a set of castings for a Stuart No. 9 engine. So far I have been afraid to start!
Looks like it will be an interesting project. Looking forward to several excellent videos and lessons on fixturing
Thanks Joe
Stuart models are about all I build. Enjoy!
Looking forward to seeing this engine take shape. 😊
I do love steam engines!!!!!
Another great build on the way, it will be great to see some of the holding & fixturing you use on this project.
I've been eye'ing Stuart kits for years - Congrats!
Maybe this will push you over the edge.
Looking forward to this build series, especially that reverse mechanism. Good Luck Joe!
Going to be wonderful seeing this built by you, Its quite large in comparison to the miniature machine tools you have made previously, your detail workmanship is out standing no guessing or using your trained eye just pure accuracy. Thank you Mr Steve Bright for this wonderful gift you have given too Joe for us all to enjoy.
I always enjoy your videos. I'm always learning something.
Woo hoo ! Great start Joe, ready for the next one.
John 🇨🇦
And another adventure begins! I look forward to watching this series.
Looking forward to this build!
I have watched Keith Appleton build and repair these D10s and many other steam engines, on his UA-cam channel for a long time. Once built there are a few tricky valve timing adjustments to do to get it running smoothly, but it shouldn't be anything you can't handle. I think you should have a fun time building this Stewart D10.
Yeah, Keith times his engines by ear. But being a musician he has that ability.
It really is a nice set of quality parts. This will be a fun build for sure eh.
Every time I see Keith machine parts I cringe...using wooden blocks for parallels, going to the belt grinder instead of the milling machine. Will be nice to see Joe machine the parts for this engine properly.
@@jackpledger8118 Keith always tells us he is not an engineer(machinist), but he seems to to do okay. Maybe a little ham-fisted, but he gets it done. He also knows the ins and outs of all of these model steam engines.
@@sfeddie1 he keeps telling people he is showing the wrong way, like when he silver solders and uses too much to show how not to do something but sometimes I wonder if he knows how to do things in a proficient manner. His use of a micrometer is a constant source of amusement to even the newblest of newbies. He does produce the goods though, by hook or by crook, so one should criticise too much.
I'm really looking forward to this build Joe, that was a very generous gift indeed!
Beautiful kit. Can't wait to see it develop. And possibly be the power drive for all the others. Mini steam shop, here we come. :D
That would be an awesome setup!
Definitely something I'm going to follow the construction of.
Ahh! More fixtures in the future…👏👏👏👍
I learn a lot from them.
I'm excited to watch this engine build. Thanks Joe.
Looking forward to the series!!
This is going to be a great project, ive got the popcorn ready
Joe, you are a lucky man. I just purchased this setup and you’re looking at right around $700 US not including the price of the taps and dies. You do a fantastic job with your videos. Thanks for your dedication.
It was a nice gift. I enjoyed the build. Good luck with yours. I hope my series helps you.
Sweet! Looking forward to watching.
Watching this series with great interest Joe, I *started* machining a D10 about a year ago which I need to finish at some point... Looking forward to seeing your unique take on some of the challenges! 🇬🇧
Always fun to watch your tutorials!!!
What a treat to see a message from you. Thanks for stopping by. :)
Fantastic gift im looking forward to thus build
good proyect joe
Great new project Joe. I look forward to seeing the progress.
Thanks for the video Joe. This will be another fun and interesting series to watch as you work you majic and figure out the process. Looking forward!!
If you should find oddities in the plans or parts that you might think an American would not put up with remember these sorts of kits are mostly built by brits of a certain age with a more "make do and mend" attitude lift over from the '40s and '50s. Not saying a kit should be Inferior, just a slight difference of attitude.
Looking forward to this series and your perfectionism, something we should all aim for.
The use of BA fixings is because whilst electrical in origin, they look right at these scales where the original would have been Whitworth. Good work, looking forward to the series.
As an Australian who went to college in America I can tell you metric confuses all Americans. Its the French spelling and division by 10 that gets them.
Go and watch Jim Gaffigan on what metric means to Americans.
that looks like a stevenson valve gear, cool stuff
Really looking forward to this build. Keep up the great content.
Looking forward to this project Joe!! Thanks!
; -)
Oh hell to the yah!!!!!! Not only is this a Stuart engine model but it’s done by “The Pie”!!! This is going to be good.
BYW: mixed measurements are nothing new. Just redid my Cummins dodge clutch. Some of its metric and some of it is imperial. Just need to be aware and consistent.
Any whitworth threads in this beastie?
Did I mention that this is going to be good!
Yes! The 1/4" X 32 is ME (model engineer) which is a Whitworth thread form. The other I saw was BA (British Association). No metric though.
Hey Joe Can't wait, thank you sir.
The teardrop file is sometimes called out as 'teardrop' in catalogs, pippin is the formal name. Handy to know when shopping for them. If one oft he sides is slightly rounded rather than flat, there are other names I can't recall.
Looking forward to another masterpiece.
This is gonna be fun and assuredly educational - Can't wait to learn..... 👍👍😎👍👍
This is going to be another great series
Rat tail files and riffler files, tools of a metal artist.
I have built a 10H and a 7A with reversing gear. I am really looking forward to learning how you fab this up!. Cheers.
Thank you for posting. Keep up the great work that you do 👍👍
This is going to be a very interesting build, thanks.
We know Steve Bright very well and share the same passions.
Workshops and Steam.
David and Lily Reading England.
Nice Project, Thank you Steve I have subscribed to your channel. I hope other of Joe's subscribers also give your channel some love!
thanks joe, love it already !
gonna watch the hole series.
cheers ben.
I'm excited to see this project. Thanks Joe.
a cool new project.