It's simple, straightforward and brutal but fair fact. Personal beliefs should not meddle with professional duties nor professional obligations should meddle with personal opinions.
Shameful judgment against a respected, self-made lady like Nupur Sharma. Unlike collegium system, she did not inherit anything, rather achieved everything on her own merit. Those who humiliated her publicly will be cursed by every patriotic Indian. Anyone defending those insulting Lord Shiva, the most sacred to Hindus, should not lie about being religious.
Chandrachud said that he prayed to god God to help him find a solution to the case not calmness of mind. Imagine a muslim judge after giving the place to Muslims says he prayed to allah to find a solution .
@ there was no evidence for a Hindu temple said court in the judgement itself. Evidence of Ram is completely different matter. Before named as Ayodhya the place was Saketh and was a predominantly Buddhist place.
@@rat34803 so u r saying Buddhism is older than Hinduism.. and where do u get that saketh name huh? It's from some book right..Then why dont u read ramayana and check how old it is what are the evidence in there...
Who follow only islam is idiot. There is difference between indian faiths and mecca faith. One teaches you to live peacefully and other teaches you to disturb peace
ANI please don't call these people. Judiciary ne desh ka bahut nuksaan kiya hein. They always defend the First Front - islamic forces, they are agents of the Second Front - Colonial forces and they work on ideas of the Third Front - Communist forces.
These people, he was the CJI you uneducated lout. There is a reason why nobody like you can only bark on social media , go achieve something big and then talk you lout
Madam don't chew carrot of Ex CJI Indian public want or doesn't want atheist, monotheist or polytheist doesn't matter. PUBLIC WANT WHATSOEVER HE SHOULD BE BOUND TO CONSTITUTION IN CAPACITY OF JUSTICE. WHAT IS ULTIMATE BLUNDER HE HAS DONE.
Yes muslim as intruder destroyed the holy place of hindus and made a useless masjid..and what does ur constitution say about that? Constitution can't be used only after it is formed..There should be some provision in constitution to correct the mistakes made by muslims before formation of constitution..muslims can't always get leverage because constitution formed in 1949 not in 1549
Watch the Full Episode Here: ua-cam.com/video/X3HeRwdkbHw/v-deo.html
Is it a crime to be a practicing Sanathani ?
Sounds like a Aurangzeb syndrome
Excellent. He is a great human.
India will face the consequences of being secular in 2075
U are going too far by next 25 years we will see that
Hating hinduism is the definition of secularism in india
You are best 👌 sir❤❤❤
Superb!
It's simple, straightforward and brutal but fair fact. Personal beliefs should not meddle with professional duties nor professional obligations should meddle with personal opinions.
We Miss Ex CJI Chandrachud and his judgement for sure.
Shameful judgment against a respected, self-made lady like Nupur Sharma. Unlike collegium system, she did not inherit anything, rather achieved everything on her own merit. Those who humiliated her publicly will be cursed by every patriotic Indian. Anyone defending those insulting Lord Shiva, the most sacred to Hindus, should not lie about being religious.
We miss our Heart Melting CJI of our Nation Physically Dr Dhananjaya Yeshwant Chandrachud
❤
Thank God he retired!!! No politician in India ever scared of the judiciary system!!! Delay in justice is equal to no justice in the most cases!!!
Hindi me kariye please... Podcast ❤
Stop calling judgements verdict it's given when jury is present if jury is not present then it's called judgement
Chandrachud said that he prayed to god God to help him find a solution to the case not calmness of mind. Imagine a muslim judge after giving the place to Muslims says he prayed to allah to find a solution .
Simple thing whether in Ayodhya ram was there first or babri?u ask urself and get ur answer then move on..
@ there was no evidence for a Hindu temple said court in the judgement itself. Evidence of Ram is completely different matter. Before named as Ayodhya the place was Saketh and was a predominantly Buddhist place.
@@rat34803 DID U EVEN READ THE JUDGE MENT
IT SAYS ABOUT THE REMAINS OF A TEMPLE
@@rat34803 so u r saying Buddhism is older than Hinduism.. and where do u get that saketh name huh? It's from some book right..Then why dont u read ramayana and check how old it is what are the evidence in there...
How shameless he has become. Would people have accepted the same thing if the same line of statement is made by a judge who is Muslim by practice?
No cause Islam teaches Al taqya
Shameless?? Because he is a practicing Hindu ? Why does that burn your heart so much ?
Who follow only islam is idiot.
There is difference between indian faiths and mecca faith.
One teaches you to live peacefully and other teaches you to disturb peace
Sir BJP kab join kar rahe ho ??
Cheap comment
Jab dhruv aam Aadmi party join krega
Dhruv Rathee AAP kab join kr rha h?
ANI please don't call these people. Judiciary ne desh ka bahut nuksaan kiya hein. They always defend the First Front - islamic forces, they are agents of the Second Front - Colonial forces and they work on ideas of the Third Front - Communist forces.
These people, he was the CJI you uneducated lout. There is a reason why nobody like you can only bark on social media , go achieve something big and then talk you lout
Madam don't chew carrot of Ex CJI Indian public want or doesn't want atheist, monotheist or polytheist doesn't matter.
PUBLIC WANT WHATSOEVER HE SHOULD BE BOUND TO CONSTITUTION IN CAPACITY OF JUSTICE. WHAT IS ULTIMATE BLUNDER HE HAS DONE.
@mohamedshaheed1270 Please elaborate on the 'blunder' he made.
I saw your name , I understood the game 😊
Ultimate blunder was letting u desert decoits on our land
Bangladesh treatment needed then they will understand the blunder 😂😂
Yes muslim as intruder destroyed the holy place of hindus and made a useless masjid..and what does ur constitution say about that? Constitution can't be used only after it is formed..There should be some provision in constitution to correct the mistakes made by muslims before formation of constitution..muslims can't always get leverage because constitution formed in 1949 not in 1549