Monuments Monday with Tim Smith | The High Water Mark of the Rebellion at Gettysburg

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 11 січ 2025

КОМЕНТАРІ • 17

  • @paulhendershot111
    @paulhendershot111 18 днів тому +4

    Tim, thanks for the information on John Bachelder. Anyone who is familiar with the battle of Gettysburg has heard his name, but I don't think most people realize everything he did in collecting and saving information which otherwise would have been lost. I need to find out more about him. Merry Christmas to everyone at ACHS!

  • @terryeustice5399
    @terryeustice5399 17 днів тому

    Thank you Tim on this History of the High Water Mark of the Battle of Gettysburg. 💕💯👍

  • @michaelhoffman5348
    @michaelhoffman5348 18 днів тому

    We are certainly indebted to John Bachelder for the battlefield we know and love today. I doubt if it would be in existence without him. His isometric map adorns a wall in my home, and his papers are a highlight of my Civil War library.

  • @meandthemrs7403
    @meandthemrs7403 18 днів тому +4

    Very good, as usual, Tim

  • @johnzajac9849
    @johnzajac9849 18 днів тому +4

    It would be interesting to know how much weight Batchelder gave to the fact that there were heavy, smoky conditions on the battlefield on the third day. Just as the rebel gun batteries were assigned varying targets on the third day, is it conceivable that different Confederate divisions were given different 'aiming points' on the Union ridge?

  • @gregoryl869
    @gregoryl869 17 днів тому

    Another awesome video by Tim

  • @dhutton77
    @dhutton77 17 днів тому

    Thanks!

  • @JaniceYocum
    @JaniceYocum 17 днів тому

    Great information. Thank you.

  • @horizon42q
    @horizon42q 18 днів тому +2

    It’s interesting on how a few people set the stage for how we all see the battlefield today. I’m sure he missed items he thought were insignificant but may have been very important. But it would be impossible to get all the information on what happened.

  • @richardwalling845
    @richardwalling845 18 днів тому +1

    Gettysburg indeed was the apex of the Army of Northern Virginia. The ANV was THE primary Confederate Army. Vicksburg was a significant campaign but I firmly believe Gettysburg was the Highwater Mark of the Confederacy. My first visit to Gettysburg was in 1965! I also agree that the Copse of Trees is proven by FACS that it was the aiming point.

  • @CommandoP
    @CommandoP 18 днів тому +2

    Awesome stuff !

  • @stflaw
    @stflaw 18 днів тому

    I have a framed copy of the Bachelder map hanging in my library. I bought it at the museum/gift shop in the Lee's Headquarters building before the Trust bought and restored it. The map always draws attention when people see it.

  • @mwdjr3158
    @mwdjr3158 18 днів тому

    Fantastic!

  • @kennethswain6313
    @kennethswain6313 12 днів тому

    It would have been interesting to meet him. Happy New Year

  • @bobo12055
    @bobo12055 17 днів тому

    I'm reading Coddington right now.

  • @dhutton77
    @dhutton77 17 днів тому

    A New Hampshire guy. I have been to his grave, which is in a very small family plot in a pretty rural part of New Hampshire, in Nottingham.

  • @user-mc4sq3fk5d
    @user-mc4sq3fk5d 16 днів тому

    There is really, to any objective standard, a contest at all between Vicksburg and Gettysburg. Nothing significant changed in the war after Gettysburg until the Overland Campaign. Vicksburg however changed the entire course of the war.