КОМЕНТАРІ •

  • @charlesbrightman4237
    @charlesbrightman4237 8 років тому +2

    This is a copy and paste of one of my comments from another YT video concerning artificial intelligence that I believe might be appropriate here:
    THE SETUP:
    1. Modern science currently recognizes four forces of nature:
    The strong nuclear force, the weak nuclear force, gravity, and electromagnetism.
    2. In school we are taught that with magnetism, opposite polarities attract and like polarities repel. But inside the arc of a large horseshoe magnet it's the other way around, like polarities attract and opposite polarities repel.
    3. Charged particles have an associated magnetic field with them.
    4. Protons and electrons are charged particles and have their associated magnetic fields with them.
    5. Photons also have both an electric and a magnetic component to them.
    FOUR FORCES OF NATURE DOWN INTO TWO:
    6. When an electron is in close proximity to the nucleus, it would basically generate a 360 degree spherical magnetic field.
    7. Like charged protons would stick together inside of this magnetic field, while simultaneously repelling opposite charged electrons inside this magnetic field, while simultaneously attracting the opposite charged electrons across the inner portion of the electron's moving magnetic field.
    8. There are probably no such thing as "gluons" in actual reality.
    9. The strong nuclear force and the weak nuclear force are probably derivatives of the magnetic field interactions between electrons and protons.
    10. The nucleus is probably a magnetic field boundary.
    11. Quarks also supposedly have a charge to them and then would also most likely have a magnetic field associated with them, possibly a different arrangement for each of the six different type of quarks.
    12. The interactions between the quarks EM forces are how and why protons and neutrons formulate as well as how and why protons and neutrons stay inside of the nucleus and do not just pass through as neutrinos do.
    13. There is probably an Electro-Magnetic Field Theory to the Atomic Structure.
    TWO FORCES OF NATURE DOWN INTO ONE:
    (We are now down to only gravity and electromagnetism):
    14. As the field outside of whatever it is acting upon might change whether forces attract or repel, and as the Earth has a massive magnetic field around it, it would not be too hard for me to think and believe that gravity is just a derivative of EM field interactions.
    15. Add to this that modern science does not know what gravity even is yet, nor has even ever found the graviton of which they claim exists.
    16. So, if true, now we are down to only the electromagnetic force that remains.
    THE EM FORCE INTERACTIONS AND QUANTA:
    17. I believe that the pure energy unit is a vibrating EM force interaction.
    18. When these vibrating forces interact with other pure energy units, they "tangle" together. Various shapes (strings, spheres, whatever) might be formed, which then create sub-atomic material, atoms, molecules, and everything in existence in this universe.
    19. Everything is basically "light" (photons) in a universe entirely filled with "light" (photons).
    THE MAGNETIC FORCE SPECIFICALLY:
    20. When the electron with it's associated magnetic field goes around the proton with it's associated magnetic field, internal and external energy oscillations are set up.
    21. When more than one atom is involved, and these energy frequencies align, they add together, specifically the magnetic field frequency.
    22. I currently believe that this is where a line of flux originates from, aligned magnetic field frequencies.
    SIDE NOTES:
    23. I believe chemical element #119 (8s1) can be found inside black holes and chemical element #120 (8s2) can be found inside stars.
    24. The energy strengths, shapes, and frequency interactions could be utilized in such a way to create a matrix for artificial intelligence.
    25. For any long term data storage, especially in quantum computers, neutrinos would probably corrupt the data that even artificial intelligence would not possibly catch. A minimum of three data storage computers would have to be utilized and then the master computer utilizing the matched data from 2 out of 3 to have the most accurate data. It would not be perfect, but would probably be the best setup for the cost.
    DISCLAIMER:
    26. As I as well as all of humanity truly do not know what we do not know, the above certainly could be wrong. It would have to be proved or disproved to know for more certainty.

  • @Luipeses
    @Luipeses 8 років тому +1

    "we Cant play defense against technology" very well said

  • @charlesbrightman4237
    @charlesbrightman4237 8 років тому

    Automated vehicles, boats, aircraft, etc: "Ethics":
    In the case of environmental changes and/or mechanical changes, (context changes):
    Do I save the passenger(s) at the expense of passers by?
    Do I basically "drive off a cliff" and kill the passenger(s) to save passers by?
    Exactly what kind of society do we choose to exist in?
    (With all the consequences and ramifications, seen and unseen, of those choices).

  • @johnpocock1289
    @johnpocock1289 8 років тому +5

    is Shivan a bot?

    • @vidyadhara
      @vidyadhara 8 років тому

      john pocock

    • @Uns4rmLhr
      @Uns4rmLhr 2 місяці тому

      Not bot but Hoor with big Dazzling eyes! Masha-ALLAH. ❤

  • @dcrunicycles
    @dcrunicycles 8 років тому

    thank you.

  • @MrAndrew535
    @MrAndrew535 8 років тому

    You already have robots with human "intelligence". They are called toasters.

  • @SergioArroyoSailing
    @SergioArroyoSailing 8 років тому

    14:32 biz model

  • @dannygjk
    @dannygjk 8 років тому +1

    Vacuous.

  • @MrAndrew535
    @MrAndrew535 8 років тому

    Would you like "AI" to smile at you politely?