Top 10 Countries by Nuclear Weapons (1945-2022)
Вставка
- Опубліковано 6 жов 2024
- This video will compare the top 10 countries by number of nuclear weapons from 1945 to 2022.
Datasources: World Bank, Federation of American Scientists, SIPRI, Statista
Music: Curse of the Scarab by Kevin Macleod
This video will compare the top 10 countries by number of nuclear weapons from 1945 to 2022. Enjoy!
«Enjoy»… with a slightly bitter aftertaste. 🙈
Hi RankingCharts, can you make a comparison for BRICS as well country by number of international students.
Can anybody tell me how the Russians did it in 3 years after the USA ?
@@lpwork6809 there is soviet spy on manhattan project
@@lpwork6809 The US gave it to England, USSR stole it and India figured it out on their own.
Let’s say it together class,”Mutual Destruction.”
They actually do have the acronym for it. The outcome would be "M.A.D" (Crazy) = Mutual Assured Destruction. The chain reaction of Nuclear warheads sent across countries would kill the entire planet on waves of destruction. 1. Initial impacts. 2. Radiation 3. Nuclear fallout 4. Nuclear Winter. In which scenario most if not all life on earth would die off due to the harsh conditions. Its mind-boggling. If we ever are hit by a nuke, your best bet is probably taking one straight on and just dying. 😔 immediately.
Mutual destruction
😂
@@EphemeralF Mutually*
@@EphemeralF that's a myth actually. Volcanoes do much more damage than any nukes.
South Africa: I just wanted to say hi, now I shall take my leave.
Belarus,kazkahstan,Ukraine too
@@muhkhazz they didn't produce it. They received their nuclear weapon from USSR
@@aleksandrosalatis they didn't receive it
@@aleksandrosalatis before the ussr collapse, the ussr had several areas to manufacture nukes including kazahks , ukraine , belarus
@@scp049leplaguedocter3 I meant that they didn't produce it after USSR has fallen
For the US and Russia currently both have almost half of their warheads as retired and awating disarmament or being disarmed. Only about 800 to 1000 are deployed for both countries. With an ICBM holding 6-10 warheads.
enough to destroy the world. In addition, no one knows the real truth, if suddenly the countries are hiding something.
Putin once said, at some conference with the United States, that about 2000-2500 units have been deployed, and another 1000-1500 units are on operational deployment, i.e., in simple words, inserted into the mine. Do not forget that Russia and the United States have long since switched to the revolver type of mines, when one tactical mine can contain up to 5 missiles, which in turn have many separable independent heads that have independent guidance within the general set. And if we take into account that Russia has hypersonic weapons, then hypersonic missiles can be located inside intercontinental missiles, including with nuclear warheads, and a common carrier rocket acts as the first stage for such missiles. In general, as Putin once said, these two countries can destroy the globe 100 times
what is ICBM
@@ariarivendelchannel ICBM is long range of Missiles, we can also say that it's intercontinental ballistic missile..
A few of them would impact billions of lives if dropped. That is scary!
The post cold war treaties is what brought the numbers down. However in modern days, it's more about effectively bypassing defensive layers. You don't need more than maybe a dozen or two successful warhead hits to completely destroy a country's infrastructure. Even if you only hit maybe 4 or 5 major cities, the country would likely eat itself in the chaos afterwards.
A few of them would not only take out the target, but everyone else too. A nuclear war could easily destroy our species.
I doubt it. Humans are very resilient. And relatively well-run governments can deal with serious emergency situations.
Look at all the bombings in WW2 of Britain, Germany, and Japan, or the bombings of North Korea and North Vietnam in those wars. Those places got the equivalent of multiple nuclear hits. Yet at no point did any of those populations or governments break, there was no internal conflict, nothing.
Heck, much of the Japanese government wanted to keep fighting on after losing most of their military, with their cities shouldering ruins and two of them radioactive.
Not saying nuclear war wouldn’t be absolutely horrific and catastrophic. Just saying that any competent government in a major country would be able to handle a few nuke hits. It would take a few dozen at least to cause total breakdown.
Let’s just hope and pray this none of this ever happens. It’s why we need to keep the morons and warmongers perpetually out of office.
@@adamesd3699 England didn't see much bombings in WW2. London is the only one that gets attention, and that is only because the Germans did it. Churchill got in and immediately started targeting German civilians, Germany predictably retaliated. Churchill was a vile human being who made that war into the ugly war it became.
@@bikinisforever4163 I think what originally happened was that a couple of German bombers got a bit lost in a night raid and missed their military target in England, dropping their bombs on a city by accident instead. So Churchill bombed a German city. Well, Hitler had promised the German people that nobody would ever bomb them. So Hitler, who had been getting impatient with the effort to break Britain’s Fighter Command, switched the German bombing effort from attacking military targets to civilian targets, primarily London. Then the British, and later the Americans, launched a policy of basically destroying German cities.
British civilian casualties from bombings did not come close to German or Japanese civilian bombing casualties in WW2. But they were still not small. If I remember correctly, more than 10,000 civilian Londoners died from German bombings. And the British government sent the children from the cities to live with families out in the countryside to save them from bombing attacks.
@@adamesd3699 From what I have read, the war in western Europe was rather mild, then Churchill got in and started targeting German civilians, then Germany naturally retaliated. Hitler had much respect for England. England going after Germany was one of the biggest blunders in history. Nothing to gain, they ended up losing their empire. And today's Brits celebrate the man who did them in, Winston Churchill.
America: North Korea is so scary, they have as many as 10 nuclear bombs.
Also America:
Hypocrites
North corea is dictator country, same as ruzzia, and it depends on one person, will he use nuke or not. And this one person may be absolutely mindless and egoistic like putler btw
Usa is like a worst liars in history
America: NK will use nukes.
Also America being the only country in the world that's ever used nukes in a war: smiley face 😀.
Well even one being used will be a huge disaster
We all know, in a comparison of such destructive weapons, 100 is about the same as 10000. The success rate of the delivery system/mechanism is much more important.
its more about anti-air defence, let’s not forget that some countries are able to prevent a nuclear strike with their anti-air missles and interceptors
not every nuclear weapon is as big as the strategic nukes of japan in 1945. Most of them are tactical nukes, which are made to destroy smaller targets like air bases etc.
@@monkey_8227 Don't be so sure , I don't trust them
@@monkey_8227 current neuclear weapon is lakh times stronger than 1945 bombs
@@monkey_8227 Actually the two nukes dropped on Japan are tactical nukes as the Fat Man was 21 kilotons and nukes up to 100 kilotons are classified as tactical nukes
Might have been interesting (though quite morbid) to have the United States start with 2 then go down to 0 before climbing again.
Imagine how scared would the people living in 1950's would be with USA having 5000 nukes in 1957 with 12 years back they have bombed Japan and razed Hiroshima and Nagasaki
USA with 31150 nukes in 1965
Soviets with 40000 in 1985
Human are Almost Exticn.
I'm just thinking, god damn, is 40,000 or even 10,000 nukes really that necessary? Seems like way way way overkill. lol
I'm quite sure you'd be good with around 300~500 nukes.
@@mrbisshieshush. 100,000 wouldn't be enough. I want to see 1 million nukes
Not really - Japan was cutting off Austalian's heads and eating their bodies at that time. More people died in the conventional bombing of Tokyo that from both nuclear weapons. Real war is much worse than imagined. USA is about freedom - if you want proof it occupied Japan but now Japan is free. Same with the UK. UK gave Hong Kong, Australia and New Zealand and a ton of other countries their independence. West is best!
during the years of the USSR, only Russia had nuclear weapons, in other countries of the social bloc there was only the deployment of the entire bloc on the territory for the defense. in the 60s the United States deployed nuclear weapons in Turkey, no one can say that Turkey had nuclear weapons
Yes same Cuba
The video showed also that Kazakhstan, Belarus and Ukraine had nuclear while they were part of USSR thats why
@@costenics_sw yeah we technically did
@@trunestor And then you dropped them?Or you gave them in Russia?
Same as the US forces in West Germany, UK and Netherlands.
It's insane how there is a time in history where humanity have ±65.000 nukes
"I don't know what weapons will be used for World War 3, but World War 4 will be fought with sticks and stones"
Albert Einstein (Paraphrased)
I love how music gets more serious as soon as Soviet Union overtake USA
Yet, the only country using them so far were the US, not Russia 😃
@@marcodambrosio4711 у России просто есть совесть по сравнению с США
@@marcodambrosio4711 and that's bad
@@Imperial19273 точно??? Орк, ти щось плутаєш)))
@marcodambrosio4711 estados unidos fue quien las invento no Rusia Rusia y los demás países copiaron
Countries have learned so much from that hiroshima and nagasaki. The potential of atomic bomb as a weapon and protection has been brought into significance. They knew you couldn’t get bullied easily no matter how small of a country you are when you have some of these shit with you. And they probably foresaw that in the future nuclear
War might become inevitable.
Fun fact : only 9 countries have nuclear weapons
Official*
@@almdudler5852 Israel is Unofficial
we (czech republic) have two tactical stacionar atom bombs
Fun fact: only one country has used nukes in war.
Fun fact: only 2 nukes have been used in wars.
@@bowxfire5275very fun fact 😂
Would be interesting to see this done as megatons
Yea That and also the amount of km² of damage each country can do using nukes.
Thanks for contents. No words, only facts.
Iraq: we don't have any weapons off mass destruction!!
USA: yes we just saw the video, now we believe you. 💰
Iraq was enriching Uranium which led the US to believe they had wmds. So Iraq may not have had them but they were attempting to make them.
Cringe
Возможно, у Ирана оно есть, но об этом никто не знает.
Но сейчас они разрабатывают его
@@fairy2995 dont worry their mock nukes
WMD diesn't mean only nukes.
In fact most of the nuclear weapons that the US and the USSR, and now Russia have are tactical nuclear weapons, they are intended to be used to destroy the enemy's military, most of them are only a few thousand tons equivalent, and are used in a duel after a major nuclear war. That's right, tens of thousands of nuclear warheads cannot completely destroy each other, because the power of nuclear weapons is actually overestimated, even for strategic nuclear bombs such as the U.S. Army's W88 warhead, the kill range in cities is only a few dozen kilometers, and the kill radius for targets in bunkers is less than 10km, and this is still the power of hydrogen bombs. Most countries have nuclear weapons only atomic bombs, and atomic bombs are difficult to do more than 500,000 tons of explosive yield, so they have a nominal nuclear deterrent, while hydrogen bombs have no upper limit of power to create hundreds of millions of tons of nuclear weapons to have the power to really destroy the country. The only countries that have hydrogen bombs are the five permanent members of the UN.
教主!!!!
The main threat is not the power or radius of warheads either tactical or strategic.
The disaster is aftermath - nuclear winter. It would reduce plants reproduction rate thus it would lead to a hunger.
@@abugaliyev The nuclear winter theory comes from fiction and is not real.
@@飞飞-l5c lol
@@guzilayerken5013 who is saying this? Lol
Because we totally know how many weapons the governments of these countries are hiding 😂 joke
Good point we def don't lmfao
The us and Russia have been pretty transparent about the number of nukes they have and are being reduced dramatically
It's quite important that the main nuclear powers, USA and Russia, continue to reduce their stocks.
@Fahim Ridzuan ??
@Fahim Ridzuan they reduce the chemical becouse of their own safety.
Reduce yes, remove no.
China is actually doing the opposite. They're planning a massive nuclear buildup in the next 10 years that could see their arsenal more than double. Remember that unlike the US and Russia, China has almost never signed a nuclear arms limitation treaty, so there is no limit on the power of the weapons they develop.
Yeah, right 😆
Just a quick remainder, the maintenance of nuclear weapons cost millions of USD, so that’s why ussr and USA reduced there nuclear arsenal, otherwise it’s a threat to themselves.
What do you even need 30k nuclear bombs for? Like, is there any difference whether you hold 200 or 20000? Are they expecting to nuke every single enemy city 2x or what even is the point
i think main point of nuke is simple: nobody will try to liberate country with nukes and several thousand of them looks more menacing on paper, and lets face it ussr wasn't country which cares about costs.
there is also second factor: not all nukes are strategic nukes, some are just tactical, very weak nukes which can be considered as artillery ammo on steroids (funny take me wrong, its still powerful, but it's only fraction of typical nuke everyone has in mind)
Nuclear bombs don't have really big radius of explosion, so more bombs = more clear territory
There are a lot more targets than just population centers. In its heyday, the arms race took on a life of its own because the nukes themselves would have been targets. "Use 'em or lose 'em."
@@ИванСен landscaping simulator 2022
it was a stupid arms race imposed by the US. Who has more - the steeper and more dangerous. They didn't care that the USSR could destroy the whole world ten times. Most importantly, the more, the better. There are resources.
А потом говорят, что Россия всем угрожает, вон, Америка первая начала, да и на Японию ещё скинула ядерную.
🤡
Right absolutely
@@deepderp8483 хрю хрю
Да, пускай лучше бы Совок положил еще миллионов 5 дедов на Японию(союзника Германии)
@@Oleksandr-w7z you do realise the soviets were also an allies of Nazi Germany
Amazing!
40k vs 23k in 1986. Insane.
20k vs 1k in 1960. Insane
2:34 Gigachad Kazakhstan *voluntarily gave up* nuclear bombs.
A state with steel balls. 🇰🇿🇹🇷
The anti-nuclear movement in Kazakhstan, "Nevada Semipalatinsk", was formed in 1989 and was one of the first major anti-nuclear movements in the former Soviet Union. It was led by author Olzhas Suleimenov and attracted thousands of people to its protests and campaigns which eventually led to the closure of the nuclear test site at Semipalatinsk in north-east Kazakhstan in 1991. The movement was named "Nevada Semipalatinsk" in order to show solidarity with similar movements in the United States aiming to close the Nevada Test Site.
Much respect to 🇰🇿 from 🇮🇳🙏
Это русское оружие
untill russia will do special kazakh operation
it is like Ukraine. they had the physical nuclear weapons within their borders but never had the ability to launch them.
Представляю если бы эти ресурсы пустить на мирные цели а не на гонку вооружений. Мы бы уже на Марс в отпуск всей планетой летали. Но нет (((
Для этого нужно поменять саму основу человека.А так,война двигатель прогресса.Многие разработки изначально были военными,но потом модифицировались под гражданские нужды.
@@sergey3533 война и лень. )
Зачем тебе Марс? Это пустыня. Что, мало пустынь на планете? Большой каньон в США
@@u_s_e_r1 ты дурень смысла не понял. (((
- Ну так страна 3.14оров то живёт маня-идеей о3.14оривания всей планеты, потому и украла ядерную бомбу у США.
*whole world dropping nukes on each other*
South America and Switzerland: 🍿🍿
Switzerland is no more neutral. It is outdated.
And Africa
No they also face worst thing in human history
@@VIBHANSHU822 it would be the best thing in human history.
Kazakhstan popping in at #3 for a short while is pretty funny
France still have 300 nuclear weapons, 280 active and 20 in stock
@Lechite i wish, but no
USA 1945
Soviet Union, 1949
United Kingdom in 1952
France, 1960
China (中国) 1964
Israel, neither confirm nor deny that they have nukes but it is said that they developed the first nuke in 1967
Imagine if Soviet union had more than 40k nukes
Japan owns -2.
canada has some too, idk-
😂
Кому они их задолжали?
😂
In 1985 USSR had 40,000 nukes and USA 23,000. Scary!
Missed some countries. Canada had Beaumark nuclear missiles in the 60s.
@Ajar I suppose you're joking. If not, you are sorely misinformed. The passage of the 1983 Constitution Act does not represent the date of Canada's independence. Though, oddly (and a fact not widely known) the US did not recognize Canada's independence until the 1920's (after the Balfour Declarations).
Canada is joke
You're talking about the Bomarc missiles, and they weren't Canadian. The US stationed the missiles in Canada and the batteries themselves were under control of the RCAF, the nuclear warheads, though, were always under the control US personnel who were stationed in Canada for that specific purpose.
Canadian forces have had control of nuclear weapons (again, US weapons) while stationed in Europe on several occasions, though.
@@mosienko1983 True, but there was still a lot more connection to the british at the time. Passports from the 70s for example still stated the holder is a British Subject.
In the end, it takes just one to destroy our planet
South Africa “Yeah?….No? Okay bye”
Former countries with Nukes:
Soviet Union - collapsed
Ukraine, Kazakhstan, Belarus - gave them to Russia
South Africa - got rid of them following the end of apartheid
As far as I remember in 2021, China had around 330 nukes and now they have 350
setting point when both of the superpowers at above 30000 nukes
The nukes are amazingly what keep us far ahead of having a 3rd World War.
The fissile material after the disarmament is still available with these big countries and can be still made available at finger tips in case they are needed.
Срок службы оружейного плутония около 10-20 лет. Читал в статье
@@stick550, это срок службы детонаторов ядерного заряда. Сам оружейный плутоний может храниться тысячелетиями. То есть из 54% мировых запасов оружейного плутония Россия может собрать 54% ядерного арсенала планеты.
For example in case of India and China we both have equal amount of uranium to make 1000 nukes as of 2021
The countries that have a lot of nuclear power plant have a lot of fissile material
Next step, destroy them all and learn to love each other
No
@@ДмитрийВорон-щ3п idgf anyway
If We Love each other, The Whole World would be Doomed with Humans Population
No if we destroy nuclear weapons then ww3 will happen
One country gave up their nuclear weapons and you can whats happening to this country
2:35 Worst mistake ever
They don't have launch codes 🗿 so it's not worth to take flight with Russia in early stage
Amen
The fact that Russia and USA had that many rockets shows you how they wasted billions of dollars on something they STILL haven’t used yet 😂😂
“Yet”!
Hope the States use theirs first. Russia deserves thermo nuclear annihilation, the rest of the world doesn’t 🤷🏼♂️(My bad?!)
К вопросу, кто начал гонку вооружений. Кто, реальная, империя зла.
Гонку вооружений начинали все.
набутылочник
- Ну так у кого на гербе нарисован земной шар в унитазной сидушке?
Гений бля@@max-hk1mr
N. Korea is having nukes just because of Pakistan , Pakistan needed money and N. Korea needed nukes so...
But who gave Pakistan nuclear weapons? i don't think they are technology advance country to produce their own nuclear weapons some say that usa gave them nuclear weapons to counter India if it's true then it really backfired because pakistan gave nuclear technology to north Korea in exchange for missile technology
@@kuldeepchauhan2806 west is idiot they gave Pakistan nuke to counter India
@@kuldeepchauhan2806 a Pakistani scientist by the name of Dr Abdul Qadeer Khan stole the nuclear formula
@@kuldeepchauhan2806 “Pakistan is not technology advanced “ salty Indian 😂
@@pinacolada896 if they are why They not make Their own Aircraft carrier?
Great
Oh I'm pretty sure that they still possess most of those nuclear weapons which they "supposedly" got rid of.
Gotta love how India and Pakistan got nukes at the same time
Delivered by Russia and the US respectively.
@@MarcelNKemet Get your facts straight. India never got it delivered. Our nukes are indigenous and are result of 30 years of research and development. Our nuke programme was so efficient that even US spy agencies didn't have a damn clue about that until we performed the 'Pokhran' tests. Our economy was so badly hit by sanctions at that time because of that., so don't dare to undermine our achievement after all the hardships we have gone through.
@@MarcelNKemet our father of neuclear program get kiled by Americans
Cia agent addimited Even that we actually
had it in 1977
We officially shows the world and mastered the tech in 90s
Just research how Indian scientists fool Americans how we hide our radiation signature from us satelite usa even put Sanctions on us for that we spend 30 years ++
If they don't kill Dr. Homi jahangir bhabha
By sabotage we can have it more faster and even had masterd in our only thorium base reactors which nobody have in world
Everyone used uranium based reactors
India heavily investing on thorium base reactors since we have one of the largest proven reserves of thorium 😉
@@avirup6186 Your achievement?? You still have about 800,000,000 people who have to shit in holes in the ground and you claim spending billions on weapons is an achievement. Next door the Pakis need hand outs for the recent floods while "achieving" a nuclear arsenal. You people deserve poverty.
This video is wrong. India already had a successful nuclear bomb test done way back in 1974. The Nuclear suppliers group (NSG) was formed against this test.
Russia: Ukraine give me all your nuclear weapons and I promise I won't invade you.
Ukraine: Okay
*Russia invades Ukraine in 2022
Ukraine: Bruh
and in 2014
While Russia definitely fucked over the Ukraine, nukes IMO have little to do with that. You need proper infrastructure to maintain your warheads and missiles in working condition, which also costs a shit ton. And Ukraine didn't have that available after the USSR dissolved. So even if they kept their nukes, by 2022 these would be already inoperable
@Оля Лопух This is not true though
@Оля Лопух боюсь это не так работает.
@Оля Лопух they didn't, they stole it
Public information that these rankings have always been very bias:
- warhead count vs. MIRV
- individual yield of each warheads
- this is official data who can believe that this is so transparent?
These warheads are reconditioned using the amount of nuclear material available. A reduction in number of warheads does not mean a reduction in firepower and sometimes result in a higher individual yield of the warheads.
Even a dozen or so nukes detonate in a small scale war, would be the deadliest conflict on earth.
90's Ukraine: we don't need this
Also ukraine 2022: help me pls 😭😭😭😭😭
Just another bitter experience of making deals with Russia (and not only with Russia)...😧
In fact, we were asked to give up nuclear weapons to the United States, Britain and Russia, for which they were supposed to protect us. But no one cares. Otherwise, they would have imposed sanctions on us, the world is not fair. That's why I hate Russia and Europe, only some countries like Poland 🇵🇱 really want to help. 🇺🇦👎🇷🇺🇪🇺🇺🇲
@@IllogicalUA, Украина бы просто не смогла оплачивать содержание ядерных бомб
@@あなたの魂は私に属しています вибач не розумію російську :/
@@あなたの魂は私に属しています Окей перекладач в допомогу :]. Головне в чому ти помиляєшся це у часі. Історія не полюбляє "бы". Ми говоримо тільки про те що вже сталося а не могло статися. І маємо ми договір за яким його сторони признають Україну в її кордонах 1991 року, відмовляються від територіальних претензій та обіцяють не застосовувати силу. В замін цьому Україна віддає свій ядерний потенціал.
Отримали ми в результаті те що звичайні росіяни 8 років кричали що Крим їхній а на сході України "громадянська війна" хоча вже тоді там були присутня їх регулярна армія. Як техніка так і війська :/
Total combine of all nukes enough to destroy the earth 💀💀💀
Even tho i lived in south africa i didnt know they had nuclear bombs :0
make sense
Wrong information India conducted nuclear test in 1974 itself
In 1991 Ukraine had the worlds third largest arsenal of nukes at 1800 But they had to return it to Russia in exchange for sovereignty and independence
То ж робіть з цього правильні висновки. Не зобов'язані - не повертайте.
Whether you don’t believe me or not, it’s fine that is up to you do the research and you’ll find out that I was right
Whether you believe me or not, that is fine do the research look it up on Wikipedia and you’ll find out why I said this
First of all, I would like to say that this video does have a few things that are not accurate, but there are some things that are accurate that one time when the USSR broke up, Belarus and Ukraine used to have nukes.
Well, South Africa almost got a chance to get the nuke they had a few.
I’ve compiled a list of the countries that have tested their first nuke in order
Nice, what about how countries have actually used them?
The USA had tested one in New Mexico, before dropping two on Japan. Ever since the USA, the USSR/Russia, Great Britain, France, China, India, Pakistan, North Korea and possibly Israel used them for testing. I don't know any other.
If you mean America dropping them on Japan pal, I suggest you look up Operation Downfall. It was either a pair of nukes or the deadliest invasion in human history. Some estimate it would have resulted in 10 million deaths, including Japanese civilians. It was one of the most awful decisions we've ever had to make, there was NO good answer. The World War II Pacific Theater was just insane.
@@thunderbird1921 yeah yeah
Japan would have surrended anyway so no need to destroy two completely civillian cities but go ahead Yankee keep justifying civilian deaths
Only usa
Of course those fascists in Israel get nukes, but talking about it is AnTi SeMiTiC
India tested its first nuclear bomb in 1974. You can recheck.
@@Hjkkgg6788 Then what is "Smiling Budda" in 1974?
@@Hjkkgg6788 en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Smiling_Buddha
If Ukraine just would have kept Nuclear Weapons they would never be invaded by Russia.
- Yes, and full cycle production was possible to launch. But people trusted to (ex)commies government, who threatened nations and disarmed 3-d nuclear arsenal in a World. Newer trust any (ex)commie, or any other kind of ruzky scum.
@@hztn Exactly! Imagine North Korea gives away Nuclear Weapon, they will be invaded within a day.
North Korea - is a shithole occupied by communism, where people has to eat grass. But they still have no tradition to sculpt roosters from manure for food - communism is not so deep in their minds.
Yeah, now remember that America helped Russia pick them up 😂
Quality over Quantity 😉
ua-cam.com/video/f38cbL54Sa0/v-deo.html
Looks like Russia wins in both sectors.
Именно)
It's a secret, but the Czechia kept one atomic bomb in case the Slovaks wanted to unite again. lol
Where is India and Pakistan? They have nuclear weapons.
Вот и спрашивается "зачем сколько".
Для гарантированной бомбëжки всего и всех - 1000 за глаза.
А тут десятки тысяч.
Учитывая уровень развития современных средств сдерживания не всё достигнет цели. Поэтому потребуется повторный залп. А устаревшие боеголовки можно продавать направо и налево
You forget to add Iran? They have ability to product nuclear fuel and launch there own satelite.
Thats far from having nuc weapon
nah pretty sure they dont have one
but if they had one they wont just announce it publicly like heyyy guys we have a nuke lol😂
You listen to too much western propaganda ma man
@@morocco622 who?
@@kingzzp613 the commenter he meant
Ranking charts can you do military size from 1600 to 2022
В 16 веке твоей бандитской страны ещё не существовало😎
I’m finally doing the rule of Kim Jong, ill, North Korea tested its first nuke in 2006
THANKS to Atal Bihari Bajyapai for first Nuclear Test for india to be in this list.
Source : trust me bro
Like any country have open files in which they announce when they build a new one
Seeing precise numbers on how many North Korea or Israel have is already ridiculous enough
Can just imagine the Israeli prime Minister "we won't tell if we possess the bomb or not but we have 51" xD
The concept of mutually assured destruction makes hiding the number of nuclear weapons you have pretty pointless. Whether it's 100 or 1000, hellish destruction is all the same.
Israel refuses to say if they have nuclear weapons or not probably because they're preparing for a war with Iran in the future and nuclear weapons usage may be on the table so they want an element of surprise.
У Украины не было ядерной программы да и оружие не её а принадлежит России
Украине перешла часть яо ссср. В обмен на гарантии которые рОССИЯ нагло нарушает она яо отдала
@@kkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkk879 Россия дала единственную гарантию, что защитит Украину, если на неё нападут с применением ядерного оружия. Научитесь читать, в том числе и Будапештский меморандум, который кстати Украина нарушила ещё в 1997 году(в 1-ый раз), проведя на своей территории совместные с НАТО учения.
@@tujup10 во-первых где я написал про защиту со стороны рОССИИ? Британия, рОССИЯ и США обязались на Украину не нападать(ответный удар можно) и не поддерживать другие страны в их военной агрессии против Украины.
Во-вторых никто совмесные учения проводить не запрещал. Это уже современная шиза путлера, про то как якобы злое НАТО россию бедную, нещасную обмануло.
Текс есть в открытом доступе, в интернете, прошу с ним ознакомиться перед тем как писать что-то
@@kkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkk879 Так ознакомься. 1 пункт Будапештского меморандума напрямую ссылается на Заключительный акт СБСЕ, в котором 58 страниц. Там четко указано, что на территории Украины НЕ МОГУТ располагаться войска НАТО или любых других военных альянсов. Не пытайся трактовать документ со своей колокольни, за тебя уже все сделали те, кто этот договор заключал.
@@tujup10 прям так и написано в акте 1975 года) к тому-же ни о каких обязательствах со стороны Украины в первом пункте не идется. Это Британия, США и рОССИЯ подтверждают Украине свое обязательство в соответствии с принципами Заключительного Акта СБСЕ уважать независимость, суверенитет и существующие границы Украины.
You forgot Germany bro. They tested a small tactical nuclear bomb .
fair to say that the attempt to win the nuclear race costed the USSR its economic stability
Not necessarily,they were doing well and produced more manufactured goods than America in the 1980s. It was more of a political dissolution
Corruption is what killed the ussr not the Nuclear race or space race
Nope. It is because of political issues.
@@JosephGabif corruption alone can kill a superpower then the US should’ve fell during the Vietnam war.
@@slaviclettuce7937 ну вы живёте за чужой счёт
Ukraine and Kazakhstan in early 90's:"What do I do with these I found in my attic?"
Ні, не правда.
So in 2002, I didn’t see Iraq on this list
If only no country has nuclear weapons the world would slightly be a safer place 😔
Nukes are literally used to protect a country
The world wouldn't be in danger of doomsday that's for sure
But it is NOT going to be peaceful, very far from it. If the USSR and US didn't have nuclear bombs they would definitely be at war, the only reason they aren't at war is because said nukes are threatening the existence of the entire human race. It's called M.A.D (Mutually Assured Destruction), if one of them is going to war, they would kill of the world.
But no county with nuclear weapons has ever been invaded. Ukraine got rid of it's nuclear weapons in exchange for peace....Worked out well didn't it?
The US, France, UK, ”isreal“: We are protecting the world from danger!
Also these countries: *Having the most deadliest weapons on earth*
Zimbabwe: Look at me I've got some......ah never mind.
its south africa
Americans and geography probably...
@@mathieuschafer1360 eqFewGWGGSDGDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDGEGWEdsgeghsrrgg
Moral of the story:collapse of ussr was a big relief in the nuclear tension.
I am eager to watch the video where the US takes the next step and reduces ALL 🛸🎈
Nuclear weapons are the key to peace and balance throughout the world.
How will they terrorize the world then? 😂
Not with China ramping up production
@@ryufireblade gjhmodiughd9uh
@@Anti_Everything ...by holding them on each other to prevent wars? For the sacrifice of good relations? Ah yes, you got it man.
Where is Japan? They have 10-20 nukes secretly🚀
I wish NO country to have a priveledge over others in regard of nuclear warhead numbers.
Welcome on planet Darwin.
@@a-dutch-z7351 lol
South Africa just came to say HI and left
Now people say that nuclear weapons will prevent World War III. Once they also talked about machine guns, and then the First World War began, followed by the Second World War. If anything, I'm sorry for the grammar, I wrote through a translator.
With 30000 nuke, US : It's time to attack sun 🌞 🤣🤣
[INSTALL GAS GAS GAS MEME AT 0:48]
People have witnessed the power of nuclear weapons from Japan.
US had shown their power on the land of Japan. A horrible country.
明らかに愚かしい事だが悲しいことに人類はこんな形でしか平和を形成出来なかったということか。
Without nuclear weapons, one empire could destroy China, Korea etc.
@@trueordrue yeah histry would have been different now by those imperials
I live in Spain and i am very proud to say that i live in a country wich has enought tecnologhy to made nukes tomorrow and it hasn't got it and probably never Will have it.
Just the US won't let you.
Main is launch systems － Russia has over 1200. NATO around 800
Занепокоєння?
India doesn’t show up in 1974, which is when they tested their first nuke
North Korea 45-100 nuclear weapons
Scud missile
@@danielbellon1635. Not a Nuclear Missile
Kims nukes are from the 60s 💀🤣💀🤣🤣💀
Try 9000
@@ZykoYFF Old or new, nuclear weapons are nuclear weapons. They can drag any country to the dark ages.
Разум и воля, спасут этот мир. Разумное и волевое решение людей больше не жить за счёт других и не работать на других, отказ от системы потребления.
Вы предлагаете отказ человека от одной из его сущностей. Потребление - норма жизни. Другое дело, наряду с этим должны занять достойное место и другие потребности.
И проблема в постоянном чрезмерном потреблении как смысла жизни. Моё мнение
@@user-cu3ij1po9p показатель разумности общества-науки. Если так дальше пойдёт то и применение станет нормой.
@@user-cu3ij1po9p по моему мнению на прямую. Так как общая система мироустройства это потребление и увеличение удовольствия как смысла жизни, поэтому соответствующие изобретения и морально этические устои, что для достижения удовольствия всё средства хороши. На фоне потреб развития отсутсвие разума и мышления индивидума, полностью исключение морально этических ограничений. Выбрался из этой карусели человечеству очень тяжело. Одни захотят поглотить других, как мешающих в достижении цели. Моё личное мнение.
@@user-cu3ij1po9p потребление рождает общество не способное к разуму. А постоянно наращивать потребление можно только за счёт других, когда других не останется остаётся или признать поражение и снизить потребление, что для потребителя смерти подобно. Поэтому один из выходов из ситуации уничтожить всех в надежде отсидется. Это лишь мое мнение.
Такие наивные.
Корейские и китайские тоже посчитали?
"Видишь суслика?"
What happened to sovient union?
Collapsed
@@bryantricardo1165 oh no, when?
@@deepderp8483 26 December 1991
- A better question: did nukes helped the USSR to prevent from separating?
Ребята, давайте жить дружно
+
Пока есть пиндосия на планете-мира не будет
Никогда!!!, пока верхушки решают как нам жить, тем более сейчас идёт перестройка мира и превращения людей в рабов системы, цифровую валюту питаются внедрить по всему миру, кто не в курсе желаю вам проснуться.
Ага, Украина отдала свое ядерное оружие за гарантии безопасности России. А потом сама Россия напала на Украину 🤯
@@parabalani На лохах только в рай въезжать 🇷🇺🇷🇺🇷🇺
Boliguay deterrant force. 130. 20.kilotons Nuk3s. Delivered by flying commercial airliners.