Use code CHEAPAUDIOMAN50 to get 50% OFF your first Factor box plus 20% off your next month of orders at bit.ly/3zzsOdg! Wiim Mini amzn.to/4fxZzbm (affiliate) Bluesound amzn.to/3SBtBRx (affiliate) check out my other channel www.youtube.com/@cheapwatchman_official BEST HIFI COMMUNITY OUT THERE patreon.com/cheapaudioman Support the Channel! Shop on Amazon amzn.to/3W8vsgK Crutchfield shop-links.co/cguPK8XEGmt Join the best hifi community out there! patreon.com/cheapaudioman TRY ROON www.rofjdjk3ns.com/33G977/2CTPL/ Tidal Deal bit.ly/3siuqSF Amazon Unlimited Music Trial amzn.to/3DRAVj9 Crutchfield shop-links.co/cguPK8XEGmt Best Buy Deals shop-links.co/cf9yDZeYtUH amzn.to/3GkNaop CAM Store (New Products!) bit.ly/30Lgu4K apos.audio?sca_ref=552340.TY98BPcZ6P massdrop.7eer.net/qnOye5
Im letting go of my audiophile tendencies and trying to just enjoy the music. Like any art, over analyzing it can ruin it. Im beginning to believe that chasing sonic excellence can compromise one's listening experience. You find yourself listening to the equipmment, instead of the music.
Eventually our hearing looses all the high frequencies and becomes muddled. Yet I can immediately tell when my speakers use Bluetooth and not Chromecast or uPnP. Airplay should be as good as wi-fi but on my Windows based equipment it is not.I find what is lacking detracts from enjoying the music even more that differences between speakers at double the cost.
I strongly lean in your direction. I know guys who are caught in that hamster wheel. I picked up a Wiim Pro Plus on sale at Crutchfield. I figured what the hey, for what it costs, you can't even go to a professional sporting event for, or even a nice dinner with the wife. I was highly skeptical, but I must say, that even my cheap non-audiophile ears, can clearly hear a much cleaner and more pure, smooth sound through the Wiim. A friend played Bluetooth music and DAC streamer music, and I chose the source 100% correct between the two, every time with my back turned so I couldn't see what the source was.
From most of what I heard on the video, the issue isn't Bluetooth, it's Apple. I'm streaming LDAC from my pixel 7 to a topping D50iii and it sounds great.
Agreed. Bluetooth can be very good and it is simple to use and works. I use uPnP and cast to speakers from tablet and phone and appreciated a far better quality that doesn't cost a penny spent. I appreciate this at home, but not on the commute or busy office.
You can put MP3's on an iphone. You can put .wav files on an iphone. What you can't put on an iphone are loseless files in which case you have to use the apple flavor.
@@acitizen5928 WAVE files are lossless. FAC is compressed but lossless. Airplay is lossless but compressed. From an iPhone you need to get a wired 3.5 mm socket to avoid lossy compression.
Bluetooth sucks is like saying class D sucks. If Bluetooth is send by LDAC codec to the qcc5225 receiver Chip in 24bit 96khz format it competes with USB from a Laptop easily.
I agree on not using iPhone in general, but also on Android phone the streaming wins in almost all cases. To the point that I'm considering to create a wifi in my car.
he said hifi. I think there's some merit to that. If you want just some really good headphones or speakers then there's no issue. But he's most likely talking about 2k+ usd equipment.
You should re-name this video to "Bluetooth sucks for iPhone" Most Android phones support LDAC out of the box. Many non Apple true wireless devices support LDAC out of the box and while it's not perfect it leaves AAC in the dust.
Bluetooth is not dead. Bluetooth isn't suited for audiophile enjoyment of the music but it is a convenient standard for connection of devices. Apple devices are limited in their codec support. Tbh Apple is limited in everything. Android supports multiple devices on Bluetooth, easy transition/switching between devices, higher throughput and range, etc. As long as you don't buy shi**y devices that only support SBC or AAC, you can have very close to lossless data rates and enjoy some portability. Unfortunately most people in the US judge technology by Apple standards or their implementation. iPhones and iPads are just overhyped and overpriced tech. Apple is the problem, not Bluetooth.
Nearly all Android phones support APTX and LDAC. I actually have earbuds for both. The APTX ones sound better than the LDAC, even though the latter has a higher resolution. The drivers play a much bigger role than the codecs. As for desktop DACS, not all of them have bluetooth, you can actually buy BT receivers for ~$100 that support higher resolution codecs with digital outputs to be connected to a DAC or amplifier. As for the Wiim Mini, how do you use it without a WiFi connection? Does the Wiim have a rechargeable battery? how do you use it at work, at an airport, car or airplane? That is one of the reasons why the puck has BT, even though it is only low resolution.
@@Hirnlego999that’s interesting, I definitely have not had that same experience. Although, I did find it got a lot better when I started using the Bluetooth codec changer app on android. It lets you force it LDAC to 900kbps rather than it defaulting to variable or one of the lower bit rates
Whilst commuting, on the street Bluetooth is fine but in a quiet place uPnP, wi-fi has a better quality and can be lossless and hi-res. The phone can get wi-fi or data over the mobile network. you can then uPnP over wi-fi to wi-fi speakers or the 3.5 mm output to headphones or hi-fi.
@@geraldmcmullon2465 Sure, but that does not apply for the situations I listed. Wired headphones/speakers beat the wireless (BT or WiFi) for HiFi listening. At work I have WiFi available, but I would not use it for sound out of privacy concerns.
Bluetooth 💯 has a place in audio. It's last place, but I probably use it the most. I have class A, AB, D systems on 6 sets of speakers. I have wired planar open backs and IEMs on a A90D. I use my Shokz (bone induction) headphones for the huge majority of listening time. Does it sound good? No! Easily the worst, BUT it is non-blocking listening. It's like having background music or podcasts injected in your brain, but you can still hear everything and talk to people. There is nothing in your ear and they don't fall off. Biggest game changer in audio for me and it's Bluetooth!!! Great for calls and listening to Cheap Audio Man! The best audio you have is the audio that is playing 😮
@@mylivingsky haha I never noticed ... small price to pay for such an excellent tactical audio device. Pro tips: use ear plugs in loud environments. Pilot friend turned me on to this. Also CGPT voice! Full on conversations with AI. 😱 oh my brain is so big now amazing these things fit.
Agree, Shokz are brilliant for consuming content while 'doing stuff'. Walking and talking with your own private soundtrack, at the right volume they're perfect.
When i first started listening to music, I used a little one speaker transistor raidio, and I turned out ok. My Bluetooth speakers are a step up from those days.
Randy such click bate so let's calm some nerves by saying my cheap and cheerful Amp the Douk Audio ST-01/ ST-01 PRO uses the aptX HD codec which supports 48kHz/24-bit LPCM audio data (576 kbps). While a lossy format, it's leagues ahead of AAC (iPhone) and SBC (usually android 9 and below) Which means my Douk Audio ST-01/ ST-01 PRO is receiving just above CD quality . Plus, it supports a fine enough bitrate to keep everything running smoothly and sounding decent enough. If your player (phone or tablet) device is android 10 and above go into developer options and check the audio codec which you can change if need be. If your using an Apple device sucks to be you and that you couldn't figure out that apple is not spelled with an "I".
What about us android users? I do have an older Amazon Echo that has a headphone jack that is hooked up to my stereo system for Amazon Music and it works great.
I wish that google make a newer usb c version of the chrome cast audio device with the latest version of wifi, and support for hi res audio like dsd while also having an ethernet port for a wired connection as an option. I still have my chrome cast audio device with micro usb but I don't like how fragile micro usb is. Wifi audio has better audio quality than bluetooth while having more bandwidth even though the range is limited. No one mentions about using wifi for audio or connecting the usb c port to an ethernet adapter for smartphones as another option for wired audio. Bluetooth audio has no real password since there are some devices that uses the default 4 digit numbers such as 0000 or 1111 as passwords for audio but it's too predictable and not secure at all and anyone can connect within range compared to wifi since wifi can be restricted to the users with strong, secure and encrypted wifi passwords.
Longtime Bluetooth lover but its only place is in the car or for headphones. Streamers are way more convenient and functional. Being able to control volume and playlist from multiple devices, and multi room pairing makes it so easy and enjoyable to use. I wish and hope Google brings back the Chromcast audio. Or the WiiM mini can support Chromecast or UA-cam Music on a new model.
Just picked up a WIim Pro which does all that for $120 CAD, so around $90 US. Hard wired Ethernet, Coax into my Rotel DT-6000. Tidal Connect sounds pretty darn good. I see Bluetooth has its fans here and I use it in the car or on the move. But it’s always a “might” with Bluetooth. You might get a high rate lossless channel but you might not if the spectrum is congested and you have no control over that. Streaming always gives you the best quality no matter what.
@@clivepacker I have a WiiM Pro also. Just in scenarios like my garage or deck where hi-fi is not crucial. The WiiM Mini size is more desirable. Also have a mix of Android and Apple devices, so I need chromecast or UA-cam music functionality. My two biggest issue with Bluetooth is the loosing connection when going out of range and version of Bluetooth that auto connect when in range.
My friend recently told me all audio quality sucks now compared to the 90s. I looked at his speakers and headphones and they’re all Bluetooth using UA-cam music, when I asked what codec he used he starred at me blankly. His jaw was on the floor when I took my WiiM and tidal connect round and explained that audio compression was his main problem. He’s now saving for a WiiM and he’s subscribed to tidal. The problem is most people not into HIFI don’t have a clue about this stuff.
Well, you said it, Bluetooth is fine for passive listening.... Even an enthusiast like myself passively listens all day and in the evening I sit down and actively listen to a record or CD. Most normies don't actively listen at all, and enthusiasts who do actively listen aren't using Bluetooth for that activate listing even if they use it the rest of the day. I really think you're yelling at clouds here.
I think you should really retitle your video to: Don't Fall for the Biggest SCAM in Hifi! Bluetooth is Dead on the iPhone 1) Please remember that iOS is not the leading mobile OS in the world. 2) Android Bluetooth is working just fine with the right equipment. 3) Using the LDAC codec, I have none of the inconveniences you mention... The sound is great, my notifications do not spoil the music... it works when my screen is off.
I don't get the hate for bluetooth... even if streming or analog connections are better for a listening session, they are miles behindes when you just want a fast, simple and bug free connection!! If you don't like it just ignore it!!
P.s. I had multiple great music systems and I can identified their differences, but I have to admit I don't think I would pass a blind test over bluetooth sound quality
I agree with you regarding home use, but Bluetooth works well as a solution for car audio. I use a Fiio BTR5 (2021) Bluetooth adapter\DAC in my non-Bluetooth (2009) car to feed audio to the 3.5mm stereo input jack. I recently bought a new Android phone having LDAC on it and can stream music I download from Tidal. While not "audiophile", it is miles ahead of trying to use a crappy FM transmitter device. I threw that thing in the trash. People need to know that Bluetooth, despite claims by manufacturers, isn't capable of 16-bit/44.1KHz CD quality let alone anything higher. At least not yet. It simply lacks the bandwidth. John Darko has several videos about this he had done over the last two or three years. Also, people should know that Airplay 2 is always going to be AAC. Only the old Airplay, call it "Airplay 1" if you want, was capable of better ALAC quality, but Apple killed it because it drained iPhone batteries far too quickly transmitting all the extra data. The thing is most devices will not let you choose to use Airplay but will default to Airplay 2, however some (very few) apps will let you force Airplay instead of Airplay 2 playback.
Randy complaining about Apple's limiited Bluetooth is like someone saying they can't make a decent cake when all they have is a toaster oven. For a while I used BT LDAC on a 2018 Google Pixel 3 (now Pixel 7). Bandwidth is 600-900 kbps, so far less lossy than what Apple can manage.
The crappy thing about Apple is that you can bet if Steve Jobs were still alive, they would have upped their audio game significantly by now beyond 320KHz AAC. Yeah, knowing Apple they would have done something proprietary, so you'd have to buy their phone and their Bluetooth or whatever device to make it work to lock you into their eco-system.
There are some specific Bluetooth based standards that are lossless, certain codecs and Bluetooth standards that have enough bandwidth. But most are not. But there are at least 2 or 3.
Believe me, all of the points you made were going through my head when my wife recently bought a pair of AirPods Maxs. I was thinking (use most obnoxious, nerdy audiophile voice) “well actually there’s no way these will sound better than my wired Hifiman Edition XSs playing 24/192 from a USB connection.” She went on a trip for a few days and left the headphones. I paired them with my IPhone and took the dogs for a walk. I did not hate them. I will grant you that they are only worth it if you use Apple Music but I’m neck deep in the ecosystem and that isn’t going to change at this point so all the features work for me. By the time she got home I really wanted my own. They’ve been on sale lately so I picked some up for a decent amount off and I haven’t looked back. 1986 me, with a crappy personal cassette player and those chintzy foam rubber headphones, can’t believe portable music sounds so good. I don’t think I would use Bluetooth in my home setup but I’ve failed the NPR test so many times I don’t know why I bother worrying about this stuff.
I haven't met anyone that can actually tell the difference between 990kbps LDAC and wired...especially as you age you can't hear high frequency anyway...not that youngsters can tell the difference either...I think we need James Randi and his coat hanger back for the amount of myths i keep seeing on these channels.
Randy, I have a very nice system, and I have integrated bluetooth. My phone (Samsung s21) has both Aptx and LDAC codes to use. I purchased an Auris BlueMe pro. It sounds really good. However, my CD player employs a Burr-Brown DAC and is phenomenal. My TV has bluetooth and LDAC codec. I'm on the fence about "upgrading" to the WIIM Pro plus. But how much better is it really?
Evidence! Show me the evidence in the form of double blind testing where people can immediately tell how bad Bluetooth is a high percentage of the time. I dare you to try it with some excellent equipment like a pair of KEF LS60 speakers that need nothing besides a music source like toslink, USB or Bluetooth. and if Apple does such a terrible job with Bluetooth, go ahead and use an iPhone to make it all the more dramatic! I’m not really an advocate for Bluetooth, I would just like people who make claims to back up those claims with real world testing!
Bluetooth is just the connection, and much like the iPhone is still stuck on usb2, they are still only using basic Bluetooth which tops out around 2mbps, buy Bluetooth standards allow up to 50mbps on EDR for over a decade now, which Qualcomm has supporting aptx lossless up to 48khz 16bit sound, otherwise known as the top quality you can get on cd so, no. You just need a device made in the last decade by a company that isn't trying to force you to buy their other mega exensive products to get anywhere near current Gen capabilities... Wiim uses Qualcomm chips too, btw.
I’d rather buy a $80 Wiim mini than a $500 phone that I don’t like or even a $200 tablet. That’s the point of this video. Buy and android phone isn’t the answer. Buy a streamer that does 24 192.
2.1+EDR has a 2Mb and 3Mb PHY. There was a 3.0+HS where the HS mode could support a WIFI PHY, but nobody is using it. No 50Mb mode is being used even proprietary.
@cheapaudioman you can get a phone that supports it for $80, buying more things isn't really am answer to either problem, physical media is still a better solution. Just saying.
@@cheapaudioman Luckily, there are many people who do not use Apple devices, at least in Europe. Most Android-based platforms include at least the Aptx HD codec and many LDACs. Anyway, I use a streamer that I built with a Raspberry Pi4 using Volumio and connect it to my DAC via bluettooh using a Snenheisser adapter. Super stable connection and I can listen to Tydal without notification interruptions. Yes, WIFI is better, but if you have the right equipment, Bluettoh doesn't seem bad to me.
It is hard for me to express how tired I am of hearing how much you hate bluetooth. Also, "it's cheaper and better", seems to me to be an outright falsehood. How exactly is it cheaper to spend a 80 to 100 bucks on a streamer, then pay every month for access to your chosen stream(s), where you get to pay money every month for content you will never listen to? The reasoning behind that seems suspect.
@@jamesschneider3828 Really? Tell that to my Pixel 8 Pro which contains all my music on board. I prefer to own my music. Feel free to rent it yourself.
I agree up to this point: It makes no sense to have a Bluetooth receiver that has a different COEDC than the transmitting device. l have three listening modes: background, casual, and serious. Background listening is just that, I have music playing while I am attending to something else that may hold my attention more than the music or even have me leaving the room or moving the headphones. Casual listening for me is what I do when I am relaxing,, reading, or writing. Serious listening for me is when I want to give undivided attention to the music, just as I would at a concert or in a club. Since I long want to deal with one CODEC, I choose LDAP. My phones (One+) and my receivers have LDAP. If I am using phones for other than casual listening, I prefer wired. I don't believe that Bluetooth is dead, but I do believe that it should never be used for serious listening. What's the point of trashing the music before it gets to you?
I was thinking the same some years ago, I was as ignorant as Randy on this video!! Until I had my S.M.S.L SU-9 Dac using LDAC Codecs through my Sony Xperia 1 V which has a dedicated Audio DAC of 24-bit/192kHz Hi-Res audio !!! It sounds way better than my Marantz CD player which cost like 2k !! It sounds way better than optical, it makes my Rotel and Cambridge amps give detail, separation of instruments, and huge differences in the bass region than any of the other inputs were providing though ¨higher resolution audio inpunts¨ I think the problem is if you have an iPhone, the Bluetooth codecs for iPhone are terrible and the sound quality through an iPhone sucks bit time!! I have an iPhone 14 and I tried it with the same DAC, it sounds like garbage
Alternative A2DP driver works well on a PC.. This comes from a boomer who has set up recording studios, worked with musicians and who began chopping up reel tape in 1973 as a kid. This does need a revisit. My room still consists of 1000s of CDs, more LPS and a fair amount of tape. I gather this is your opinion.. However your channel is becoming choppy. Constructive criticism.
Bluetooth doesn’t sound as good as streaming but can be more convenient. I use it when teaching because it connects quicker and Apple Music, drum machine and transcription apps etc are available instantly.
Wrong! I agree generally on your Bluetooth assessment. However, the 'ifi Zen Blue' Bluetooth streamer is an excellent sounding exception. You must try it, Randy! I sometimes prefer its sound to the wiim mini. Seriously.
It sounds a lot like your complaints stem from the fact that you use Apple products. You seem to take that as a given, and assume that the entire world has no choice but to make the same flawed decisions you made.
It's only good enough, if you don't care. There are options that sound better, though. Bluetooth tends to be congested in the high mid range, where most instruments and voices are. And, there is very little change in volume. Which is a surprisingly important part of music.
when using a wired earphone you get just one da conversion from pcm to analog. With bluetooth you get a conversion from pcm to analog, analog to bt -codec, bt codec to analog. Three conversions with crappy hardware, so Spotify too will sound worse with bluetooth, especially in sub optimal reception conditions.
That’s a fun test. I was able to pick out the 128 mp3 reliably, but could not consistently pick out the uncompressed against the 320 kbps. Tried it using an iPhone 13 Pro and AirPods pro version 2. A higher quality setup may have made the difference there, but I kind of doubt it.
@@squiggy8110 I got about 70 pct correct. A random guess would get about 30 pct correct. I’m 48 used a 2019 MacBook Pro 16 inch with 30$ jbl wired headphones. I’m starting to think some Bluetooth speakers with meh codecs sound awesome. The go play 3 from HK is sweet
@creativeslink Using my Rotel A11 Tribute amp's Bluetooth, I sometimes can't tell the difference between mp3 320 and .wav tracks on my Sony digital player. Also, using Bluetooth instead of a cable connected to the amp, I find Bluetooth louder at a lower setting and the Sony battery lasts longer before I need to recharge it. My passive speakers hooked to the amplifier are the Monitor Audio Bronze 50s.
A couple of months ago, I picked up the WIIM Pro Plus from Crutchfield. It has totally transformed my music listening experience. And that's coming from a guy who was taking a leap of faith, thinking that this is probably another Hi-fi snake oil thing. And I don't even have audiophile speakers. Just some RCA (Radio Shack) three way floor speakers that I completely rebuilt recently. Using a Marantz SR6015. Thank you for your channel. You opened my mind to the DAC streamer idea about a year ago.
There are some exceptions to the rule, Rotel implement the Bluetooth to a very good standard . Plus its great for Bluetooth speakers when your out and about, either speaker or headphones . So there is a place for it .. Its cheap enough to have both nowadays..
LDAC Bluetooth is good. With Bluetooth convenience, it's still an option. Manufacturers should still invest this technology to make it even better. Streamers are still difficult to work with.
Yep. Does it every time. I noticed that it stays at 900 with atmos though. The way I’ve been getting around it is by using my MacBook and setting the system to airplay.
John Darko has done numerous videos on this over the last two years. Airplay 2 will always default to using AAC. Only the older Airplay, call it Airplay 1, or whatever, would let you transmit ALAC. The issue was it killed iPhone batteries too quickly streaming lossless data, hence Apple "fixed it" for the non-audiophile masses by having Airplay 2 default to AAC.
@@CamaradaMejia yes, my nephew and his wife use MacBooks. I think the main "gotcha" with Apple's OS is that you have to manually select bit depths and rates. Hopefully, Apple will fix that sometime.
Bluetooth isnt the greatest for quality and i'll never understand the point to a bluetooth turntable. That said, little compares to bluetooth for convenience. I would never use them for critical listening but most of my days are spent using a pair of multipoint bluetooth headphones that simultaneously connect to. My phone, tablet, and work pc. Phone is for personal calls, tablet ks for music and videos, and thd work pc is for calls and zoom/teams meetings. The quality isnt the best but the setip is kore than serviceable during working hours.
I guess, but how much does a cable cost? Nothing is better than a cable. That tiny little filament of copper that connects the headphones to the source makes it hi-fi. Even those horrible FM modulators that connect to your FM tuner, I guess that's barely hi-fi. I hate listening to compressed FM with nothing existing above 16,000.
I have a Bluesound Node in one room and also send music to another system in a different room via a Ifi bluetooth receiver and it sounds great. I also only use Android phones for private listing on the move and wouldn't touch Apple with a barge pole .But thats my choice and I'm happy with it ,but to be honest its my choice in music that makes me happy ,so however you listen just enjoy it.
Sound quality is perfectly good, it's transparent - with AptX HD or LDAC. Don't use Apple devices that force AAC. I disagree with all your other opinions on this as well. Sure, I use wired headphones when listening but that's because I want to use these specific Sennheisers that are wired only. That said, I'd have zero problem putting short-short cables on them and mounting a FiiO BTR7 to the headband and listening that way either. And obviously on the go using Bluetooth is by far the more convenient option than having a giant dongle sticking out of your phone making it impossible to pocket very easily and you have wires everywhere. I still use wired IEM's, but wired to a FiiO BTR5 in this case. It sounds outstanding, and I can hear no difference between using USB C wired to it vs using the Bluetooth. Because Bluetooth at higher bitrates like AptX HD or LDAC is transparent...
I still use it in certain cases. Never with headphones and never with my built sound systems. I do however have a small portable speaker that I take to the front porch (no system out there yet!) and I certainly do use it in the car.
I use the headphone jack , 40 ft wire and splitter then 70hz hi pass and douk preamp (tpa5532 chip) and it is better than Bluetooth. Plate amp for sub does not not need preamp. Try this if you doubt my budget hospice system.
I'm with you Randy; I pronounce it "Weem" as in the double ii phonetic "ee" in Hawaii and skii. Incidentally, I'm loving my Wiim streamer as being the best bang for the buck in my audio system.
My WiFi has problems so I connect my IPad with the dongle dac that I bought to use with my headphones (a dragonfly cobalt) to my amplifier using Apple Music, the music sounds as good as if I was playing cds. So if you have a good external dac or dongle dac that you can connect to Apple device. I bought a headphone from Dali speaker company (not cheap) that can play Bluetooth, can connected with a cable using dongle dac, and also using a cable directly to computer or tablet. Ok I am 65 years old but I will be dammed if I can hear even a small difference (classical music, rock, jazz, and more) Ludo Belgium
I love the analogy of UPS throwing your compressed audio down the stairs. -- i hate it when the sound skips off a Bluetooth connection. Even if it's not great fidelity, it is a horrible connection. Use wires, people.
I hear you for a stationary HiFi system, this makes perfect sense if you’re questioning whether you should get a DAC for Bluetooth functionality specifically. But even for intentional listening, LDAC from an android using the Bluetooth switcher app to force 900kbps is pretty sweet. I use it with Sony XM4s while I work. I also sometimes use a pair of wired 7hz timeless earbuds, but I work with electron microscopes so it’s nice not to have a cable while prepping samples, and I can listen in great quality. I’ve got a spare older android just for this.
Maybe the title of this video should have been "Stop using Crapple to stream your music" ...I built a dedicated media server many years ago to stream my flac music files to my portable devices. I pay $5 dollars a month to stream all the music I want to my phone which is connected to JBL earbuds and the quality is just fine....and goes everywhere I do.😊
I’ve never been a big fan of Bluetooth, especially for critical listening. It is OK for on the go usage such as wireless headphones or speakers. I even have a Wiim in my bathroom because I dislike Bluetooth that much. Do have Anker wireless IEMs and a small JBL Bluetooth speaker that I take on the go. They are just fine for that purpose, but definitely not as good as the Wiim.
RE: 'Sounds terrible'... I'm all in for proper cabled earphones (have multiple sets).. But, have you tried aptX Lossless? What is it like? Is it the best BT will ever get? How does it compare with cabled 'Ear gear'? 🤔😏 😎🇬🇧
aptx lossless will switched to something else if it is crowed and has inference. You have no control. Going uPnP and wired headphones is better. wi-fi 7 might change it all.
I agree with many others. It might not sound/work great on apple, but I have both an Audioengine N22 and a BluDento BLT-HD that both support aptX HD as does my Samsung Galaxy Zfold 5 I can look and see what codec is being used.....works great for me. Not losless, but at 24-bit/48kHz audio, with a bitrate of 576kbps better than most of the sources I will be playing.
Good topic to bring up. Listening to this using Bluetooth on the go. Are the portable streamers you mention portable? Codecs are misleading. About 10% influence on audio quality. Hardware, recording, eartip fit... arw crucial. I love audio and practicality. So i use a mix of wired IEMs to dedicated daps and phones with 3.5mm, i use a usb c dac dongle, a BT adapter dor IEMs and wireless earbuds (including excellent Status ANC- sound better than my other earbuds. And apple airpods pro 2 - great for cancelling out background train noise and convenience).
Since the most widely used streaming service (Spotify) only offers mp3 quality, the limitations of bluetooth hardly matter. And anyone using a higher quality source already is aware of the limitations of bluetooth and how to deal with them.
Can't speak for all the codecs but LDAC is brilliant, indistinguishable from lossless the second you walk away from expensive audio gear. But Randy has a good point, my phone drops to SBC in a heartbeat which is really frustrating. Android Auto is the number one culprit, it's driving me spare. Pardon the pun.
Of course, streamers are better, if you have Wi-Fi available. If you are at the pond house with no Internet, Bluetooth is your only option for accessing, TIDAL, etc..
Randy; My Bluetooth usage, headphones, when walking the dog, cutting the grass. When I am listening to to Sirius/XM in my office, I will run it on my iPad, and Bluetooth it to my powered speakers, Sirius only broadcast at AAC 256. But if I am listening to iTunes, I will plug my iPad or iPhone into the speakers via USB, to get that lossless stream.
I have the BTR5 (2021) and it works fine at LDAC from my mid-tier Samsung phone. It isn't full CD quality, but pretty close. For my use in a car, it is plenty fine.
That’s what I was thinking. Problem is most of these work via wi-Fi. I don’t use Wi-Fi. So the only real option is Bluetooth. Which this video is about. I purchased a HomePod thinking yay AirPlay. Then I discovered airplay is Wi-Fi based. DAMN…. I later discovered that it does support Bluetooth. But Apple doesn’t make it easy.
I prefer wi-fi with my music systems. Bluetooth has its place. It’s Great for my portable speakers that I use on the go. Enjoy the music. Don’t let your connectivity make you blue. Rock on.
Use code CHEAPAUDIOMAN50 to get 50% OFF your first Factor box plus 20% off your next month of orders at bit.ly/3zzsOdg!
Wiim Mini amzn.to/4fxZzbm (affiliate)
Bluesound amzn.to/3SBtBRx (affiliate)
check out my other channel www.youtube.com/@cheapwatchman_official
BEST HIFI COMMUNITY OUT THERE patreon.com/cheapaudioman
Support the Channel! Shop on Amazon amzn.to/3W8vsgK
Crutchfield shop-links.co/cguPK8XEGmt
Join the best hifi community out there! patreon.com/cheapaudioman
TRY ROON www.rofjdjk3ns.com/33G977/2CTPL/
Tidal Deal bit.ly/3siuqSF
Amazon Unlimited Music Trial amzn.to/3DRAVj9
Crutchfield shop-links.co/cguPK8XEGmt
Best Buy Deals shop-links.co/cf9yDZeYtUH
amzn.to/3GkNaop
CAM Store (New Products!) bit.ly/30Lgu4K
apos.audio?sca_ref=552340.TY98BPcZ6P
massdrop.7eer.net/qnOye5
Im letting go of my audiophile tendencies and trying to just enjoy the music. Like any art, over analyzing it can ruin it. Im beginning to believe that chasing sonic excellence can compromise one's listening experience. You find yourself listening to the equipmment, instead of the music.
Eventually our hearing looses all the high frequencies and becomes muddled. Yet I can immediately tell when my speakers use Bluetooth and not Chromecast or uPnP. Airplay should be as good as wi-fi but on my Windows based equipment it is not.I find what is lacking detracts from enjoying the music even more that differences between speakers at double the cost.
I strongly lean in your direction.
I know guys who are caught in that hamster wheel.
I picked up a Wiim Pro Plus on sale at Crutchfield.
I figured what the hey, for what it costs, you can't even go to a professional sporting event for, or even a nice dinner with the wife.
I was highly skeptical, but I must say, that even my cheap non-audiophile ears, can clearly hear a much cleaner and more pure, smooth sound through the Wiim.
A friend played Bluetooth music and DAC streamer music, and I chose the source 100% correct between the two, every time with my back turned so I couldn't see what the source was.
I fully agree with you. Music is the most important, whether it is mp3, flac or hires. I will enjoy it all.
Same here. Music over technicalities ❤
From most of what I heard on the video, the issue isn't Bluetooth, it's Apple. I'm streaming LDAC from my pixel 7 to a topping D50iii and it sounds great.
Agreed. Bluetooth can be very good and it is simple to use and works. I use uPnP and cast to speakers from tablet and phone and appreciated a far better quality that doesn't cost a penny spent. I appreciate this at home, but not on the commute or busy office.
My hearing is lossy but I'm not going to stop using it.
Sure! Enjoy! Just don't be fooled by some slick salesdude that it's going to be audio nirvana.
🤣😂🤣
Respect ✊
You should immediately return it to the vendor with a strongly worded complaint and request an upgraded version that performs better. 🤔😉
@@sRw-61 👋🏻😂👍🏻🍷
1. Don't use an IPhone. 2. Make an A- B-test. If you don't hear a difference, fine. 3. Don't buy some fancy device you don't need.
You can put MP3's on an iphone. You can put .wav files on an iphone. What you can't put on an iphone are loseless files in which case you have to use the apple flavor.
@@acitizen5928but ALAC is lossless and you can use it on Apple devices, or is that what you’re saying?
@@acitizen5928 WAVE files are lossless. FAC is compressed but lossless. Airplay is lossless but compressed. From an iPhone you need to get a wired 3.5 mm socket to avoid lossy compression.
Bluetooth sucks is like saying class D sucks. If Bluetooth is send by LDAC codec to the qcc5225 receiver Chip in 24bit 96khz format it competes with USB from a Laptop easily.
He is assuming that the whole world is a fan of apple.😂
@@klausfreis7202 portable LDAC headphones amps makes Bluetooth awesome again
IFI ZEN BLU, does a decent job for me
Also, not everyone uses IPhone 😂
@@lincso6018Same here - Randy praised it in one of his early videos and even then saw Apple as the problem.
This video can be summed up as "Bluetooth is great, just don't use an iPhone"
My thoughts exactly
I agree on not using iPhone in general, but also on Android phone the streaming wins in almost all cases. To the point that I'm considering to create a wifi in my car.
I have never had an iphone, but I don't do bluetooth headphones on my android, wired only. I use it in the car though.
The problem is not Bluetooth. Apple is the problem. Overhyped and overpriced crap.
Is this just an ad for Wiim? lol
Wow! That's exactly what I was thinking... 😂
this is coming from someone who says “audiophiles are full of 💩” …
he said hifi. I think there's some merit to that. If you want just some really good headphones or speakers then there's no issue. But he's most likely talking about 2k+ usd equipment.
You should re-name this video to "Bluetooth sucks for iPhone" Most Android phones support LDAC out of the box.
Many non Apple true wireless devices support LDAC out of the box and while it's not perfect it leaves AAC in the dust.
I use a 5 year old andoid phone and it has LDAC...
People are bluetoothing vinyl to amps 😂😂
Really..why would anyone do that! 😊
lol ya that is funny
In the groups where people are asking about “Bluetooth” turntables, to go to their Bluetooth speakers, I tell them, just get a cheap streamer.
Crazy idea.
Of course they do. How else would you get digital sound quality?
Bluetooth is not dead. Bluetooth isn't suited for audiophile enjoyment of the music but it is a convenient standard for connection of devices. Apple devices are limited in their codec support. Tbh Apple is limited in everything. Android supports multiple devices on Bluetooth, easy transition/switching between devices, higher throughput and range, etc. As long as you don't buy shi**y devices that only support SBC or AAC, you can have very close to lossless data rates and enjoy some portability. Unfortunately most people in the US judge technology by Apple standards or their implementation. iPhones and iPads are just overhyped and overpriced tech. Apple is the problem, not Bluetooth.
Nearly all Android phones support APTX and LDAC. I actually have earbuds for both. The APTX ones sound better than the LDAC, even though the latter has a higher resolution. The drivers play a much bigger role than the codecs. As for desktop DACS, not all of them have bluetooth, you can actually buy BT receivers for ~$100 that support higher resolution codecs with digital outputs to be connected to a DAC or amplifier. As for the Wiim Mini, how do you use it without a WiFi connection? Does the Wiim have a rechargeable battery? how do you use it at work, at an airport, car or airplane? That is one of the reasons why the puck has BT, even though it is only low resolution.
" The APTX ones sound better than the LDAC" my impression as well. LDAC lacks dynamics
@@Hirnlego999that’s interesting, I definitely have not had that same experience. Although, I did find it got a lot better when I started using the Bluetooth codec changer app on android. It lets you force it LDAC to 900kbps rather than it defaulting to variable or one of the lower bit rates
@@CamaradaMejia OK, I'll try that app
Whilst commuting, on the street Bluetooth is fine but in a quiet place uPnP, wi-fi has a better quality and can be lossless and hi-res. The phone can get wi-fi or data over the mobile network. you can then uPnP over wi-fi to wi-fi speakers or the 3.5 mm output to headphones or hi-fi.
@@geraldmcmullon2465 Sure, but that does not apply for the situations I listed. Wired headphones/speakers beat the wireless (BT or WiFi) for HiFi listening. At work I have WiFi available, but I would not use it for sound out of privacy concerns.
Also a lot of the people I know have portable speakers they use all the time when they go places. Bluetooth is great for a lot of things.
It is great for polluting the environment with your crappy musical taste
Yup, it fits the bill just fine when I go camping.
@@D1N02 I listen to the same music as he does so you’re saying he has bad taste in music?
Bluetooth 💯 has a place in audio. It's last place, but I probably use it the most. I have class A, AB, D systems on 6 sets of speakers. I have wired planar open backs and IEMs on a A90D.
I use my Shokz (bone induction) headphones for the huge majority of listening time. Does it sound good? No! Easily the worst, BUT it is non-blocking listening. It's like having background music or podcasts injected in your brain, but you can still hear everything and talk to people. There is nothing in your ear and they don't fall off.
Biggest game changer in audio for me and it's Bluetooth!!! Great for calls and listening to Cheap Audio Man!
The best audio you have is the audio that is playing 😮
@@mattmiller4978 good luck if it is an open run pro, the more u use it, likely it gonna leaves a dent on U at the contact point.
@@mylivingsky haha I never noticed ... small price to pay for such an excellent tactical audio device.
Pro tips: use ear plugs in loud environments. Pilot friend turned me on to this. Also CGPT voice! Full on conversations with AI. 😱 oh my brain is so big now amazing these things fit.
Agree, Shokz are brilliant for consuming content while 'doing stuff'. Walking and talking with your own private soundtrack, at the right volume they're perfect.
Want to become an alcoholic? Take shot every time he says Codec!
Damn........and I`m still using Hi Bob.
Or uploads a filler video.
Ah'm wwaaaayy ahead of yaa! 🍺🍺🍺🍺🍺
When i first started listening to music, I used a little one speaker transistor raidio, and I turned out ok. My Bluetooth speakers are a step up from those days.
This is why I stick to android. My Google phone has ATPXHD and LDAC and sounds really good! Had a WiiM mini and the WiFi was shocking!
Try uPnP casting - better quality than Bluetooth or Airplay. I use wired headphones and wired earbuds.
Shoking? Good or bad shocking?
@@geoCow BAD!
Randy such click bate so let's calm some nerves by saying my cheap and cheerful Amp the Douk Audio ST-01/ ST-01 PRO uses the aptX HD codec which supports 48kHz/24-bit LPCM audio data (576 kbps). While a lossy format, it's leagues ahead of AAC (iPhone) and SBC (usually android 9 and below) Which means my Douk Audio ST-01/ ST-01 PRO is receiving just above CD quality . Plus, it supports a fine enough bitrate to keep everything running smoothly and sounding decent enough. If your player (phone or tablet) device is android 10 and above go into developer options and check the audio codec which you can change if need be. If your using an Apple device sucks to be you and that you couldn't figure out that apple is not spelled with an "I".
Wish I could hear well enough for it to make a difference
What about us android users? I do have an older Amazon Echo that has a headphone jack that is hooked up to my stereo system for Amazon Music and it works great.
you can upgrade your codecs it's in developer options
@@Boswd Thanks but I don`t see it in developer options.
@@webman1956 do you haave deleloper option available in your "about phone" menue if so you have to scroll all the way towards the bottom
You are right: Apple just sucks!
Other than that: Bluetooth with aptx(HD) or LDAC is just fine, for "seriuos" listenig also.
Nothing wirelessly transmitted is ok for critical listening.
That's just objectively false. The lossless standards transmit perfectly unadulterated data, no different from wires.@@Audiodreamer192-24
@@Audiodreamer192-24 So, any wifi is bad..... ?? yeah right... like all your streaming options are all wireless..
@@SilmarilS79 for music yes!,
I only use hard connections for streaming. Fact….
I wish that google make a newer usb c version of the chrome cast audio device with the latest version of wifi, and support for hi res audio like dsd while also having an ethernet port for a wired connection as an option. I still have my chrome cast audio device with micro usb but I don't like how fragile micro usb is. Wifi audio has better audio quality than bluetooth while having more bandwidth even though the range is limited. No one mentions about using wifi for audio or connecting the usb c port to an ethernet adapter for smartphones as another option for wired audio. Bluetooth audio has no real password since there are some devices that uses the default 4 digit numbers such as 0000 or 1111 as passwords for audio but it's too predictable and not secure at all and anyone can connect within range compared to wifi since wifi can be restricted to the users with strong, secure and encrypted wifi passwords.
Every time I see those Bluetooth turntables, a little audiophile fairy dies inside of me.
Longtime Bluetooth lover but its only place is in the car or for headphones.
Streamers are way more convenient and functional. Being able to control volume and playlist from multiple devices, and multi room pairing makes it so easy and enjoyable to use.
I wish and hope Google brings back the Chromcast audio. Or the WiiM mini can support Chromecast or UA-cam Music on a new model.
Just picked up a WIim Pro which does all that for $120 CAD, so around $90 US. Hard wired Ethernet, Coax into my Rotel DT-6000. Tidal Connect sounds pretty darn good. I see Bluetooth has its fans here and I use it in the car or on the move. But it’s always a “might” with Bluetooth. You might get a high rate lossless channel but you might not if the spectrum is congested and you have no control over that. Streaming always gives you the best quality no matter what.
@@clivepacker I have a WiiM Pro also. Just in scenarios like my garage or deck where hi-fi is not crucial. The WiiM Mini size is more desirable. Also have a mix of Android and Apple devices, so I need chromecast or UA-cam music functionality.
My two biggest issue with Bluetooth is the loosing connection when going out of range and version of Bluetooth that auto connect when in range.
My friend recently told me all audio quality sucks now compared to the 90s. I looked at his speakers and headphones and they’re all Bluetooth using UA-cam music, when I asked what codec he used he starred at me blankly.
His jaw was on the floor when I took my WiiM and tidal connect round and explained that audio compression was his main problem. He’s now saving for a WiiM and he’s subscribed to tidal.
The problem is most people not into HIFI don’t have a clue about this stuff.
Well, you said it, Bluetooth is fine for passive listening.... Even an enthusiast like myself passively listens all day and in the evening I sit down and actively listen to a record or CD. Most normies don't actively listen at all, and enthusiasts who do actively listen aren't using Bluetooth for that activate listing even if they use it the rest of the day. I really think you're yelling at clouds here.
It's YET ANOTHER REASON why I'm Android ALL THE WAY BABY! 😉👍🤣🤣🤣 😎🇬🇧
I think you should really retitle your video to: Don't Fall for the Biggest SCAM in Hifi! Bluetooth is Dead on the iPhone
1) Please remember that iOS is not the leading mobile OS in the world.
2) Android Bluetooth is working just fine with the right equipment.
3) Using the LDAC codec, I have none of the inconveniences you mention... The sound is great, my notifications do not spoil the music... it works when my screen is off.
This ^ 100%
You're not even a boomer you should know that Bluetooth technology is almost indistinguishable from direct connection
I don't get the hate for bluetooth... even if streming or analog connections are better for a listening session, they are miles behindes when you just want a fast, simple and bug free connection!! If you don't like it just ignore it!!
P.s. I had multiple great music systems and I can identified their differences, but I have to admit I don't think I would pass a blind test over bluetooth sound quality
I agree with you regarding home use, but Bluetooth works well as a solution for car audio. I use a Fiio BTR5 (2021) Bluetooth adapter\DAC in my non-Bluetooth (2009) car to feed audio to the 3.5mm stereo input jack. I recently bought a new Android phone having LDAC on it and can stream music I download from Tidal. While not "audiophile", it is miles ahead of trying to use a crappy FM transmitter device. I threw that thing in the trash. People need to know that Bluetooth, despite claims by manufacturers, isn't capable of 16-bit/44.1KHz CD quality let alone anything higher. At least not yet. It simply lacks the bandwidth. John Darko has several videos about this he had done over the last two or three years.
Also, people should know that Airplay 2 is always going to be AAC. Only the old Airplay, call it "Airplay 1" if you want, was capable of better ALAC quality, but Apple killed it because it drained iPhone batteries far too quickly transmitting all the extra data. The thing is most devices will not let you choose to use Airplay but will default to Airplay 2, however some (very few) apps will let you force Airplay instead of Airplay 2 playback.
Randy complaining about Apple's limiited Bluetooth is like someone saying they can't make a decent cake when all they have is a toaster oven. For a while I used BT LDAC on a 2018 Google Pixel 3 (now Pixel 7). Bandwidth is 600-900 kbps, so far less lossy than what Apple can manage.
That's pundit, Randy. Only one "n" in pundit. There are no pundints.
"If you use IPhone..." Well, we don't! My phone, my headset, my TV, my DAC .. they all has LDAC.
A wiim-a-wak, a wiim-a-wak, a wiim-a-wak, a wiim-a-wak. In the jungle, the mighty jungle my streamer streams ALAC…
The crappy thing about Apple is that you can bet if Steve Jobs were still alive, they would have upped their audio game significantly by now beyond 320KHz AAC. Yeah, knowing Apple they would have done something proprietary, so you'd have to buy their phone and their Bluetooth or whatever device to make it work to lock you into their eco-system.
There are some specific Bluetooth based standards that are lossless, certain codecs and Bluetooth standards that have enough bandwidth. But most are not. But there are at least 2 or 3.
Bluetooth can be good. Just don't use Apple devices.
Amazon music to Chromecast , then optical cable to receiver. Works pretty good and no Bluetooth.
Believe me, all of the points you made were going through my head when my wife recently bought a pair of AirPods Maxs. I was thinking (use most obnoxious, nerdy audiophile voice) “well actually there’s no way these will sound better than my wired Hifiman Edition XSs playing 24/192 from a USB connection.” She went on a trip for a few days and left the headphones. I paired them with my IPhone and took the dogs for a walk. I did not hate them. I will grant you that they are only worth it if you use Apple Music but I’m neck deep in the ecosystem and that isn’t going to change at this point so all the features work for me. By the time she got home I really wanted my own. They’ve been on sale lately so I picked some up for a decent amount off and I haven’t looked back. 1986 me, with a crappy personal cassette player and those chintzy foam rubber headphones, can’t believe portable music sounds so good. I don’t think I would use Bluetooth in my home setup but I’ve failed the NPR test so many times I don’t know why I bother worrying about this stuff.
I haven't met anyone that can actually tell the difference between 990kbps LDAC and wired...especially as you age you can't hear high frequency anyway...not that youngsters can tell the difference either...I think we need James Randi and his coat hanger back for the amount of myths i keep seeing on these channels.
Randy, I have a very nice system, and I have integrated bluetooth. My phone (Samsung s21) has both Aptx and LDAC codes to use. I purchased an Auris BlueMe pro. It sounds really good. However, my CD player employs a Burr-Brown DAC and is phenomenal. My TV has bluetooth and LDAC codec. I'm on the fence about "upgrading" to the WIIM Pro plus. But how much better is it really?
Evidence! Show me the evidence in the form of double blind testing where people can immediately tell how bad Bluetooth is a high percentage of the time.
I dare you to try it with some excellent equipment like a pair of KEF LS60 speakers that need nothing besides a music source like toslink, USB or Bluetooth. and if Apple does such a terrible job with Bluetooth, go ahead and use an iPhone to make it all the more dramatic!
I’m not really an advocate for Bluetooth, I would just like people who make claims to back up those claims with real world testing!
Every delighted audiophile has to hate:
Bluetooth,
Bose,
Blindtests,
and Bud light
;-)
Bluetooth is just the connection, and much like the iPhone is still stuck on usb2, they are still only using basic Bluetooth which tops out around 2mbps, buy Bluetooth standards allow up to 50mbps on EDR for over a decade now, which Qualcomm has supporting aptx lossless up to 48khz 16bit sound, otherwise known as the top quality you can get on cd so, no.
You just need a device made in the last decade by a company that isn't trying to force you to buy their other mega exensive products to get anywhere near current Gen capabilities...
Wiim uses Qualcomm chips too, btw.
I’d rather buy a $80 Wiim mini than a $500 phone that I don’t like or even a $200 tablet. That’s the point of this video. Buy and android phone isn’t the answer. Buy a streamer that does 24 192.
2.1+EDR has a 2Mb and 3Mb PHY. There was a 3.0+HS where the HS mode could support a WIFI PHY, but nobody is using it. No 50Mb mode is being used even proprietary.
@cheapaudioman you can get a phone that supports it for $80, buying more things isn't really am answer to either problem, physical media is still a better solution. Just saying.
@@cheapaudioman Luckily, there are many people who do not use Apple devices, at least in Europe. Most Android-based platforms include at least the Aptx HD codec and many LDACs. Anyway, I use a streamer that I built with a Raspberry Pi4 using Volumio and connect it to my DAC via bluettooh using a Snenheisser adapter. Super stable connection and I can listen to Tydal without notification interruptions. Yes, WIFI is better, but if you have the right equipment, Bluettoh doesn't seem bad to me.
44.1 is CD quality, 48 is DVD quality.
Bluetooth in a moving vehicle is ok, that environment is terrible for serious listening anyway. I never define myself as an audiophool.
It is hard for me to express how tired I am of hearing how much you hate bluetooth. Also, "it's cheaper and better", seems to me to be an outright falsehood. How exactly is it cheaper to spend a 80 to 100 bucks on a streamer, then pay every month for access to your chosen stream(s), where you get to pay money every month for content you will never listen to? The reasoning behind that seems suspect.
Spot On!
Most of the world streams. Those that don’t are truly a minority. It doesn’t matter what’s media is perceived as better, it’s just a fact.
You still have to use a service for the music Bluetooth or wifi
@@jamesschneider3828 Really? Tell that to my Pixel 8 Pro which contains all my music on board. I prefer to own my music. Feel free to rent it yourself.
@@DB-cg1rr That may be the case but that does not make it a good decision. There are plenty of things that "Most People" do that I consider stupid.
Bluetooth in my car sounds way better than AppleCar Play in my car.
I agree up to this point: It makes no sense to have a Bluetooth receiver that has a different COEDC than the transmitting device. l have three listening modes: background, casual, and serious. Background listening is just that, I have music playing while I am attending to something else that may hold my attention more than the music or even have me leaving the room or moving the headphones. Casual listening for me is what I do when I am relaxing,, reading, or writing. Serious listening for me is when I want to give undivided attention to the music, just as I would at a concert or in a club. Since I long want to deal with one CODEC, I choose LDAP. My phones (One+) and my receivers have LDAP. If I am using phones for other than casual listening, I prefer wired.
I don't believe that Bluetooth is dead, but I do believe that it should never be used for serious listening. What's the point of trashing the music before it gets to you?
I was thinking the same some years ago, I was as ignorant as Randy on this video!! Until I had my S.M.S.L SU-9 Dac using LDAC Codecs through my Sony Xperia 1 V which has a dedicated Audio DAC of 24-bit/192kHz Hi-Res audio !!! It sounds way better than my Marantz CD player which cost like 2k !! It sounds way better than optical, it makes my Rotel and Cambridge amps give detail, separation of instruments, and huge differences in the bass region than any of the other inputs were providing though ¨higher resolution audio inpunts¨ I think the problem is if you have an iPhone, the Bluetooth codecs for iPhone are terrible and the sound quality through an iPhone sucks bit time!! I have an iPhone 14 and I tried it with the same DAC, it sounds like garbage
Alternative A2DP driver works well on a PC.. This comes from a boomer who has set up recording studios, worked with musicians and who began chopping up reel tape in 1973 as a kid. This does need a revisit. My room still consists of 1000s of CDs, more LPS and a fair amount of tape. I gather this is your opinion.. However your channel is becoming choppy. Constructive criticism.
Bluetooth doesn’t sound as good as streaming but can be more convenient. I use it when teaching because it connects quicker and Apple Music, drum machine and transcription apps etc are available instantly.
Wrong! I agree generally on your Bluetooth assessment. However, the 'ifi Zen Blue' Bluetooth streamer is an excellent sounding exception. You must try it, Randy! I sometimes prefer its sound to the wiim mini. Seriously.
It sounds a lot like your complaints stem from the fact that you use Apple products. You seem to take that as a given, and assume that the entire world has no choice but to make the same flawed decisions you made.
If you use Spotify... Bluetooth is good enough.
@@saltysourdough Yeah!
It's only good enough, if you don't care. There are options that sound better, though. Bluetooth tends to be congested in the high mid range, where most instruments and voices are. And, there is very little change in volume. Which is a surprisingly important part of music.
@@saltysourdoughSpotify Premium has pretty good sound quality. Definitely not the free version though.
@@saltysourdoughIt's good enough for car
when using a wired earphone you get just one da conversion from pcm to analog. With bluetooth you get a conversion from pcm to analog, analog to bt -codec, bt codec to analog. Three conversions with crappy hardware, so Spotify too will sound worse with bluetooth, especially in sub optimal reception conditions.
If you are over 40 take the npr file type indentificarion test. If you fail just go with prettier speakers and stop caring what Bluetooth can do.
That’s a fun test. I was able to pick out the 128 mp3 reliably, but could not consistently pick out the uncompressed against the 320 kbps. Tried it using an iPhone 13 Pro and AirPods pro version 2. A higher quality setup may have made the difference there, but I kind of doubt it.
@@squiggy8110 I got about 70 pct correct. A random guess would get about 30 pct correct. I’m 48 used a 2019 MacBook Pro 16 inch with 30$ jbl wired headphones. I’m starting to think some Bluetooth speakers with meh codecs sound awesome. The go play 3 from HK is sweet
@creativeslink Using my Rotel A11 Tribute amp's Bluetooth, I sometimes can't tell the difference between mp3 320 and .wav tracks on my Sony digital player. Also, using Bluetooth instead of a cable connected to the amp, I find Bluetooth louder at a lower setting and the Sony battery lasts longer before I need to recharge it. My passive speakers hooked to the amplifier are the Monitor Audio Bronze 50s.
@@thomasalexand I also do aac from Apple Music to a Yamaha rs202 which allows for that codec. I think it’s crystal on JBLs
A couple of months ago, I picked up the WIIM Pro Plus from Crutchfield.
It has totally transformed my music listening experience.
And that's coming from a guy who was taking a leap of faith, thinking that this is probably another Hi-fi snake oil thing.
And I don't even have audiophile speakers.
Just some RCA (Radio Shack) three way floor speakers that I completely rebuilt recently.
Using a Marantz SR6015.
Thank you for your channel. You opened my mind to the DAC streamer idea about a year ago.
There are some exceptions to the rule, Rotel implement the Bluetooth to a very good standard . Plus its great for Bluetooth speakers when your out and about, either speaker or headphones . So there is a place for it .. Its cheap enough to have both nowadays..
LDAC Bluetooth is good. With Bluetooth convenience, it's still an option. Manufacturers should still invest this technology to make it even better. Streamers are still difficult to work with.
9:48 Airplay dropping to AAC needs to be explored before I splash out on a Wiim Mini.
Yep. Does it every time. I noticed that it stays at 900 with atmos though. The way I’ve been getting around it is by using my MacBook and setting the system to airplay.
John Darko has done numerous videos on this over the last two years. Airplay 2 will always default to using AAC. Only the older Airplay, call it Airplay 1, or whatever, would let you transmit ALAC. The issue was it killed iPhone batteries too quickly streaming lossless data, hence Apple "fixed it" for the non-audiophile masses by having Airplay 2 default to AAC.
@@rosswarren436interesting, I have noticed though it seems like MacBooks can do ALAC, at least it streams at 900kbps vs my iPhone at 256
@@CamaradaMejia yes, my nephew and his wife use MacBooks. I think the main "gotcha" with Apple's OS is that you have to manually select bit depths and rates. Hopefully, Apple will fix that sometime.
Bluetooth isnt the greatest for quality and i'll never understand the point to a bluetooth turntable. That said, little compares to bluetooth for convenience. I would never use them for critical listening but most of my days are spent using a pair of multipoint bluetooth headphones that simultaneously connect to. My phone, tablet, and work pc. Phone is for personal calls, tablet ks for music and videos, and thd work pc is for calls and zoom/teams meetings. The quality isnt the best but the setip is kore than serviceable during working hours.
Bluetooth 5.0+ and LDAC. Thats literally CD quality in bandwidth, 24 bit and 96kHz.
Bluetooth is dead.. not!
Bluetooth has its place for basic peripherals but that's about it. Some sound is better than no sound at all.
I guess, but how much does a cable cost? Nothing is better than a cable. That tiny little filament of copper that connects the headphones to the source makes it hi-fi. Even those horrible FM modulators that connect to your FM tuner, I guess that's barely hi-fi. I hate listening to compressed FM with nothing existing above 16,000.
I have a friend who swears that bI-wiring is better than just hooking up a regular cable. LOL
false meritless lie of a statement.
I feel so sorry for the all the Apple users. Too bad you're trapped in the Apple ecosystem and can't just move to Android. We warned you.
For home listening, why not just go... wired?
Knocking your head over the best wireless format for home listening is... weird.
Every dinner at my house is a party! We party with the Cambridge MXN10!
Long live Bluetooth, Bluetooth is dead, Long live Bluetooth!
Im totally fine with ldac, close lossless for redbook.
I use Bluetooth in the garage with an old Sony receiver and a Chinese Bluetooth receiver plus an iPad. Plays thru Minimus 7’s
I have a Bluesound Node in one room and also send music to another system in a different room via a Ifi bluetooth receiver and it sounds great. I also only use Android phones for private listing on the move and wouldn't touch Apple with a barge pole .But thats my choice and I'm happy with it ,but to be honest its my choice in music that makes me happy ,so however you listen just enjoy it.
One more reason I don't use an iPhone.
Sound quality is perfectly good, it's transparent - with AptX HD or LDAC. Don't use Apple devices that force AAC. I disagree with all your other opinions on this as well. Sure, I use wired headphones when listening but that's because I want to use these specific Sennheisers that are wired only. That said, I'd have zero problem putting short-short cables on them and mounting a FiiO BTR7 to the headband and listening that way either. And obviously on the go using Bluetooth is by far the more convenient option than having a giant dongle sticking out of your phone making it impossible to pocket very easily and you have wires everywhere. I still use wired IEM's, but wired to a FiiO BTR5 in this case. It sounds outstanding, and I can hear no difference between using USB C wired to it vs using the Bluetooth. Because Bluetooth at higher bitrates like AptX HD or LDAC is transparent...
I still use it in certain cases. Never with headphones and never with my built sound systems. I do however have a small portable speaker that I take to the front porch (no system out there yet!) and I certainly do use it in the car.
Holy frick! What is that monstrosity on your left wrist? Looks like someone strapped a bracelet to the hatch off a Sherman tank!
I use the headphone jack , 40 ft wire and splitter then 70hz hi pass and douk preamp (tpa5532 chip) and it is better than Bluetooth. Plate amp for sub does not not need preamp. Try this if you doubt my budget hospice system.
I'm with you Randy; I pronounce it "Weem" as in the double ii phonetic "ee" in Hawaii and skii. Incidentally, I'm loving my Wiim streamer as being the best bang for the buck in my audio system.
My WiFi has problems so I connect my IPad with the dongle dac that I bought to use with my headphones (a dragonfly cobalt) to my amplifier using Apple Music, the music sounds as good as if I was playing cds. So if you have a good external dac or dongle dac that you can connect to Apple device.
I bought a headphone from Dali speaker company (not cheap) that can play Bluetooth, can connected with a cable using dongle dac, and also using a cable directly to computer or tablet.
Ok I am 65 years old but I will be dammed if I can hear even a small difference (classical music, rock, jazz, and more)
Ludo
Belgium
I love the analogy of UPS throwing your compressed audio down the stairs. -- i hate it when the sound skips off a Bluetooth connection. Even if it's not great fidelity, it is a horrible connection. Use wires, people.
Yup 👍
@@Audiodreamer192-24 if you do do the Bluetooth, make sure to use Bose speakers
@@doctorquestian lmao
Good one lol
Ya Bose and Bluetooth go together like a sloppy taco and warm beer….😂👍
I hear you for a stationary HiFi system, this makes perfect sense if you’re questioning whether you should get a DAC for Bluetooth functionality specifically.
But even for intentional listening, LDAC from an android using the Bluetooth switcher app to force 900kbps is pretty sweet. I use it with Sony XM4s while I work. I also sometimes use a pair of wired 7hz timeless earbuds, but I work with electron microscopes so it’s nice not to have a cable while prepping samples, and I can listen in great quality. I’ve got a spare older android just for this.
Interesting, no one seems to agree with you.
Maybe the title of this video should have been "Stop using Crapple to stream your music" ...I built a dedicated media server many years ago to stream my flac music files to my portable devices. I pay $5 dollars a month to stream all the music I want to my phone which is connected to JBL earbuds and the quality is just fine....and goes everywhere I do.😊
I’ve never been a big fan of Bluetooth, especially for critical listening. It is OK for on the go usage such as wireless headphones or speakers. I even have a Wiim in my bathroom because I dislike Bluetooth that much. Do have Anker wireless IEMs and a small JBL Bluetooth speaker that I take on the go. They are just fine for that purpose, but definitely not as good as the Wiim.
The conclusion of this video ist, F..k Apple!
I always said that and will say it again Apple sucks!
RE: 'Sounds terrible'... I'm all in for proper cabled earphones (have multiple sets).. But, have you tried aptX Lossless? What is it like? Is it the best BT will ever get? How does it compare with cabled 'Ear gear'? 🤔😏 😎🇬🇧
aptx lossless will switched to something else if it is crowed and has inference. You have no control. Going uPnP and wired headphones is better. wi-fi 7 might change it all.
I agree with many others. It might not sound/work great on apple, but I have both an Audioengine N22 and a BluDento BLT-HD that both support aptX HD as does my Samsung Galaxy Zfold 5 I can look and see what codec is being used.....works great for me. Not losless, but at 24-bit/48kHz audio, with a bitrate of 576kbps better than most of the sources I will be playing.
Bluetooth sent to my BluMe Pro, Fed to my 1979 Marantz SR2000 receiver, and Definitive Technology speakers sounds dang good to me.
Good topic to bring up.
Listening to this using Bluetooth on the go.
Are the portable streamers you mention portable?
Codecs are misleading. About 10% influence on audio quality. Hardware, recording, eartip fit... arw crucial.
I love audio and practicality. So i use a mix of wired IEMs to dedicated daps and phones with 3.5mm, i use a usb c dac dongle, a BT adapter dor IEMs and wireless earbuds (including excellent Status ANC- sound better than my other earbuds. And apple airpods pro 2 - great for cancelling out background train noise and convenience).
Since the most widely used streaming service (Spotify) only offers mp3 quality, the limitations of bluetooth hardly matter. And anyone using a higher quality source already is aware of the limitations of bluetooth and how to deal with them.
I think Bluetooth sounds great, I noticed no difference between that and my vinyl
Can't speak for all the codecs but LDAC is brilliant, indistinguishable from lossless the second you walk away from expensive audio gear. But Randy has a good point, my phone drops to SBC in a heartbeat which is really frustrating. Android Auto is the number one culprit, it's driving me spare. Pardon the pun.
Whenever I have the chance, I buy used Airport Express 2. Airplay 2, multispeaker all around the house. Analog amps are shining thru those
Yep. Those old airports are extremely good.
Android phone with ldac. Shure aonic 50 with ldac. Throw away everything apple.
Of course, streamers are better, if you have Wi-Fi available. If you are at the pond house with no Internet, Bluetooth is your only option for accessing, TIDAL, etc..
Randy;
My Bluetooth usage, headphones, when walking the dog, cutting the grass.
When I am listening to to Sirius/XM in my office, I will run it on my iPad, and Bluetooth it to my powered speakers, Sirius only broadcast at AAC 256. But if I am listening to iTunes, I will plug my iPad or iPhone into the speakers via USB, to get that lossless stream.
I was considering buying the Qudelix-5K or the Fiio BTR15. Are neither of them actually sending LDAC like it says it does?
Both are good the Qudelix is better imo...but if you need 4.4mm get the BTR15
I have the BTR5 (2021) and it works fine at LDAC from my mid-tier Samsung phone. It isn't full CD quality, but pretty close. For my use in a car, it is plenty fine.
That’s what I was thinking. Problem is most of these work via wi-Fi. I don’t use Wi-Fi. So the only real option is Bluetooth. Which this video is about.
I purchased a HomePod thinking yay AirPlay. Then I discovered airplay is Wi-Fi based. DAMN…. I later discovered that it does support Bluetooth. But Apple doesn’t make it easy.
I prefer wi-fi with my music systems. Bluetooth has its place. It’s Great for my portable speakers that I use on the go. Enjoy the music. Don’t let your connectivity make you blue. Rock on.
Thank you Randy.
I have two JBL extreme speakers with Bluetooth very nice sound
But when we want to get serious, we play vinyl on vacuum tubes