A nicer Mitsubishi than I’m used to seeing, as your review says, it is good to drive. technology works. But a CVT? Another good review and a car that should sell reasonably well. I like the dashboard.
I agree with the auto I prefer the old torque converter gearbox but most manufacturers Favour CVT cause of they are the most fuel efficient but Mazda still use the 6sp TC and there fuel figures are similar to the makes that use CVT eg the CX5 fuel usage pretty much the same as Forrester and outlander
A great review and I agree with you about CVT. The fact you like it Allan means I will recommend it to a friend who is looking for a new SUV.
if they want real comfort, they'd feel very much at home i think
@@gaycarboys Thanks very much!
Big improvement over the previous model, merry Xmas and happy new year Gents.
you can say that again. and happy NY to you too
A nicer Mitsubishi than I’m used to seeing, as your review says, it is good to drive. technology works. But a CVT? Another good review and a car that should sell reasonably well. I like the dashboard.
agree. and the seats are incredibly comfortable as well... not bad pricing either
I don't mind CVT's for their fuel economy; good family car. Love the Tonto reference. Cheers-John
i've seen too many of them fly apart! Also dislike the way the engine performs
I agree with the auto I prefer the old torque converter gearbox but most manufacturers Favour CVT cause of they are the most fuel efficient but Mazda still use the 6sp TC and there fuel figures are similar to the makes that use CVT eg the CX5 fuel usage pretty much the same as Forrester and outlander
an 8-sp that locks up from 2nd would be even better!