One of the best presentations I ever listened too. Speaker is very clear, knowledgeable, precise and to the point. He keeps you interested in lecture. Thank you wet much !!
Thank you doctor. It is important information for me to choose my dentist. I try to choose between the 2 nice dentist and one of the dentist have the 3 D x ray machine.
Hi, Wonder where you got the 33 uSv figure for traditional FMX? A traditional FMX using F speed and round collimation should result in an absorbed dose of approx. 170 uSv. Darn little, but not 33. The figure you quoted is appropriate for rectangular collimation, which is rarely employed in the USA.
One of the best presentations I ever listened too. Speaker is very clear, knowledgeable, precise and to the point. He keeps you interested in lecture. Thank you wet much !!
Thank you. This was very helpful from a patient’s perspective.
I wish all teachers were like him
This presentation is super and the presenter knows how to impart knowledge
This is one of the best systematic explanations I have ever seen...... Thank you Doc.
What's the pathology on 1:32? @Dr. Alok Tandon
A very clear presentation ! Thank you Dr. Parish Sedghizadeh for this interesting lecture .
Very interesting and well presented. Many thanks for sharing
Wow! This type of technology for dental work is Amazing!
So orthodontist and dentist should get it right😊
Outstanding presentation
Thank you, amazing presentation
Thank you doctor. It is important information for me to choose my dentist. I try to choose between the 2 nice dentist and one of the dentist have the 3 D x ray machine.
Thanks for sharing this video.
Thank you so much for sharing this video. Can someone tell me the name of the good speaker, please?
Oral radiologists are the authority for cbct interpretation. Pathologist should do the final diagnosis using histology.
Iranian docs are AWESOME
Hi,
Wonder where you got the 33 uSv figure for traditional FMX? A traditional FMX using F speed and round collimation should result in an absorbed dose of approx. 170 uSv.
Darn little, but not 33. The figure you quoted is appropriate for rectangular collimation, which is rarely employed in the USA.
thank you, im a student this is a great overview of CBCT. What's the pathology on 1:32?
Please answer my question after reading it, thank you. What's the different between Panoramic and Con Beam X-ray?
Thank u for this video
Thanks for sharing this video.