NEW Airbus A400M for MSFS! | Military AIRLIFTER Review!

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 18 вер 2024

КОМЕНТАРІ • 70

  • @hidalgohouse3815
    @hidalgohouse3815 Рік тому +23

    Feels these developers charging these higher prices are still stuck in P3D FSX marketing mentality. There are add ons being released in the 15 to 20 price range that come much more complete. Pass.

    • @vlxxrd4866
      @vlxxrd4866 Рік тому +3

      Selling at lower prices is so much smarter as well. The market in MSFS dwarfs the P3D/XP12 market.
      Reducing your price from $60 to $20, you will sell SIGNIFICANTLY more copies that will outweigh the $40 price cut.
      That being said…$30 for MSFS means it should visually meet the standards.

    • @marionetteworks
      @marionetteworks Рік тому

      As someone who produced payware, I doubt most developers make enough money off MSFS add-ons to actually justify the time spent, I certainly wouldn't be able to make living off it, not even close. And don't forget MS takes a huge cut of the price. Having said that there are developers who are just more experienced and able to make all these BESPOKE (sigh) cockpits and high res textures etc. while others are still learning, and it's a big learning curve. Hopefully he will make free updates that improve it over time, as for example the V-22 developers are constantly doing.

    • @deepposeidon289
      @deepposeidon289 Рік тому

      Yeah I was pretty shocked that the C-130 was selling at $24 AUD just for the exterior with no virtual cockpit... like worth $5... maybe $10 at most for nothing but an outside model.

    • @MrTrevisol4
      @MrTrevisol4 Рік тому +1

      I've seen better freeware than this

  • @atmgolf6817
    @atmgolf6817 Рік тому +8

    Thanks for your videos there always the most informational 👏

  • @philiphepworth2849
    @philiphepworth2849 Рік тому +15

    Let's just call it the Captain Sim A400M.

    • @bratalistic1617
      @bratalistic1617 Рік тому

      00:40 seconds in and expectations are immediately lowered after reading this.
      UPDATE: Expectations weren't as unfulfilled as i initially thought, maybe i am a easy to please person. Especially if there's some rendition of military aircraft I can formation fly with in other payware jets.

  • @andersdrakkar
    @andersdrakkar Рік тому +6

    What a cash grab… thanks for the review!

  • @jano979797
    @jano979797 Рік тому +6

    The flight model is quite bad. You can't fly higher then FL250, there are just no performance data modelled for any altitude above.
    Also there is no APU even though the A400M has an APU
    For me, not all hope is lost tho. The cockpit of the a400M is based on the cockpit of the A380( if you look at them side by side they are actually quite similar) so I hope that once, Fbw releases the A380, someone like headwind, will pick it up and does a model for the A400 based on the FBW A380

  • @chrisbailey9331
    @chrisbailey9331 Рік тому +2

    Thank you for your honest review, it’s a great shame that this aircraft hasn’t been brought up to the standard that we now expect from msfs !
    As you say it is hoped that Roland Laborie will take notice of the reviews and rework the function and texture and sound deficiencies ❗️
    So for me, I don’t think that I’ll purchase it for the full price ❗️

  • @TheMaddoguk
    @TheMaddoguk Рік тому +2

    I'll wait for the C160 Transell.

  • @vlxxrd4866
    @vlxxrd4866 Рік тому +8

    Looks like freeware quality

  • @Aerialphotovito
    @Aerialphotovito Рік тому +1

    I think it looks pretty good Brandon - but not worth 36 Euro thanks for the honest review

  • @daviddavids8218
    @daviddavids8218 Рік тому +2

    Thanks for the review, save 30eu out of my pension. Will wait until they upgrade it to MSFS, straight honest review appreciated. There are better cockpits on some cheaper aircraft. Let’s hope they wise up and put in the work. Thank you

    • @daviddavids8218
      @daviddavids8218 Рік тому

      Oh one thing, if you see a prop doing that “Rotating off centre”… Get the crew to shut it down, like NOW, or it will fail catastrophically

  • @richardsuttill54
    @richardsuttill54 Рік тому +5

    Thank you for another useful review. It feels like this offering is at the same level of non-fidelity as the Latin airbuses although they may have better physical models. It may appeal to some people but I feel it is over priced for what it offers. I would like to believe it would get updates, but to make this a serious model I feel that is unlikely to occur. So for serious simmers I feel this option is too weak. It is a resounding NO from me.

    • @gervanwilliams2664
      @gervanwilliams2664 Рік тому +1

      I agree. I have strong buyers remorse because I jumped to acquire it before reading reviews, as I was looking forward to a C130-type aircraft (with cockpit). So disappointed.

  • @chrisbailey9331
    @chrisbailey9331 Рік тому +1

    Following my last comments; Roland Laborie has updated the aircraft and is now available as Version 2; with updated cockpit, hud and propeller textures. It’s much, much better now and R L is continuing to improve this brilliant aircraft!

  • @SimRaceFly80
    @SimRaceFly80 Рік тому +7

    You can get the PMDG 737-600 for this price! Don't waste your money on this plane.

  • @exiletsj2570
    @exiletsj2570 Рік тому +1

    Love the A400 but I'm not this desperate. Guess someone will have a use for it.

  • @scootermason2746
    @scootermason2746 Рік тому +1

    Looks like the old Wilco A400M from FSX and FS9 still fun to fly

  • @delalima
    @delalima Рік тому

    thanks for the review i don't like what i see , i'll wait

    • @PilotStudd
      @PilotStudd  Рік тому

      You’re welcome thanks for watching, I don’t recommend it unless you really want an A400!

  • @antonydelguste7735
    @antonydelguste7735 Рік тому

    Hello, since yesterday an update is available with
    a correctif for the HUD , VS power management and cruise speed on high altitude

  • @pricelessppp
    @pricelessppp Рік тому

    Azul poly is coming out with a military bush cargo plane this or the following week!

  • @JackBiss
    @JackBiss Рік тому +2

    Do we know if this is coming to Xbox?

  • @formula1forever350
    @formula1forever350 Рік тому +1

    A400 for DCS please 🙏

  • @aaronsucksverymuch
    @aaronsucksverymuch Рік тому

    The a400m is also in use by the belgian air force

  • @bratalistic1617
    @bratalistic1617 Рік тому

    Expectations weren't as unfulfilled as I initially thought. Or maybe I am a easy to please person, especially if there's some rendition of military aircraft I can formation fly with in other payware jets. Just a slightly cheaper cost should be fair.

  • @leehill8437
    @leehill8437 Рік тому

    this product is now inactive on simarket does anyone have any information about that ?

  • @WilliamBugeater64Simpson
    @WilliamBugeater64Simpson Рік тому

    I keep getting a warning, "PTU Heat". Can you tell me where to find that switch. I have looked and looked and cannot find it. Thank you Sir and keep the excellent vids coming!

    • @Deadkiller-xl2fs
      @Deadkiller-xl2fs Рік тому +1

      Funny because the a400m doesn´t have a ptu 😅

  • @ziepex7009
    @ziepex7009 Рік тому

    Bit sad Roland got their hands on it first, but good effort anyway! (not really)

  • @microsoftflightsimulator2052

    I have to take issue when you say you work at a busy airport - Tumbleweed international is far from busy 😂😂

    • @PilotStudd
      @PilotStudd  Рік тому

      2nd busiest heliport in the UK! Come work here for a day and you’ll see it’s surprisingly busy at times 🥹

  • @foxaviationtime
    @foxaviationtime Рік тому +1

    the dev forgot to tighten the prop bolt (excuse my unprofessionalism)

  • @tommolen3635
    @tommolen3635 Рік тому

    RedFlip switch above the door swivel switch lift the safety catch and flip switch

  • @JC-oj5tz
    @JC-oj5tz Рік тому +1

    Can’t believe the developer is allowed to charge for the AM400 it’s not finished. The C17 is far better quality and it’s free - cmon Microsoft this things terrible. This should be freeware and would still consider poor quality. 😮 what a joke.

    • @JC-oj5tz
      @JC-oj5tz Рік тому

      The modelling looks like it’s a toy.

  • @theonefrancis696
    @theonefrancis696 Рік тому

    It feels like they've modeleded it on a C175 lol

  • @andersnrtangen8561
    @andersnrtangen8561 Рік тому

    Just bought this yesterday and wish I had seen your review. Very disappointed, and the model spawns under ground when not starting from a runway. Mostly I desire better sounds.
    I hope we as a community would reject this quality at this steep price point, as it undermines the value of the actual properly good mods. It's half the price of a really good addon, but I would guess not even ten percent of the work. Also SimMarket has no return policy, and they remove negative reviews. I would not recommend buying from them.

  • @rollonsummertime
    @rollonsummertime Рік тому +1

    looks more like FSX🤔£10 max

  • @gervanwilliams2664
    @gervanwilliams2664 Рік тому

    I purchased this a few days ago and flew it once (in VR). In my opinion, the cockpit is terrible in VR. The texture quality and buttons are absolutely horrible to look at. They look like blocks ported from FSX or another previous simulator iteration. Sitting in the cockpit does not feel like a MSFS quality cockpit, especially if you own PMDG 737 or Aerosoft CRJ aircrafts. I was anticipating this aircraft, and I have to say that I am quite disappointed. In fact, some of the buttons don't work the first time they are pressed, until pressed multiple times. I am looking forward to a modder overhauling the basic visual aesthetic of this cockpit to one that I can actually feel pleased while flying. Again, utterly disappointing.

    • @PilotStudd
      @PilotStudd  Рік тому

      100% agree Gervan, thanks for watching!

  • @jessicatimm559
    @jessicatimm559 Рік тому

    Because of quality like this I know I will automatically avoid RL products in the future and wont trust this dev.

  • @evflyguy
    @evflyguy Рік тому

    2D prop animations. 🤦‍♂️

  • @speedbird2221
    @speedbird2221 Рік тому

    Gorgeous aircraft, terrible physics (especially with full flaps)

  • @calaiscruiser
    @calaiscruiser Рік тому

    Absolute rubbish product just like every other plane Roland Laborie has made for MSFS. Quite annoyed I made the mistake of buying this crap. You'd have thought by now he would be able to make a decent product but clearly that still isn't the case.

  • @dbvetter7485
    @dbvetter7485 Рік тому +1

    All MSFS plane systems suck because MSFS do not have the system power like X-Plane. Oh wow the armrest go up and down 😮 totally worth $40, not.

    • @PilotStudd
      @PilotStudd  Рік тому +6

      MSFS is just as capable with systems as Fenix/PMDG show, it’s just such a big market, that devs can make products like this and get away it as plenty will still buy it!

    • @MikeyD142
      @MikeyD142 Рік тому +1

      PMDG, FENIX, FBW, INI BUILDS suck? bro have a seat and stop talking nonsense

    • @PilotStudd
      @PilotStudd  Рік тому +5

      @@MikeyD142 The caps here make your point much more official. ;)

    • @MikeyD142
      @MikeyD142 Рік тому

      @@PilotStudd lol the complaining is just too much, the fact that we have Xplane and MSFS is amazing to begin with. they are both great sims for different reasons, that's it.

    • @PilotStudd
      @PilotStudd  Рік тому +1

      @@MikeyD142 I completely agree!

  • @dryque
    @dryque Рік тому +2

    A400 Atlas is just a C-130 Hercules on steroids... lol, it looks really good :D

    • @PilotStudd
      @PilotStudd  Рік тому +1

      Looks good but can’t say it is good yet!

    • @santy5496
      @santy5496 Рік тому

      it's not that good the IRS don't even work

    • @dryque
      @dryque Рік тому

      @@PilotStudd what I meant was, I thought they smelled bad on the outside

    • @dryque
      @dryque Рік тому

      @@santy5496 I didn't watch it all the way through when I commented, the flashy intro got me