New cost-sharing restrictions on the way

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 22 лип 2024
  • In this Flying Reporter Pilot Briefing..
    - The CAA pushes ahead with restrictions on advertising Cost-Sharing flights, despite objections from the vast majority
    - Active carbon monoxide detectors could become mandatory in the cockpit
    - The UK's Flight Information Services could be in for an overhaul
    This Flying Reporter Pilot Briefing is sponsored by Flyer Watches.
    www.flyerwatches.com/
    The briefing is made in association with Astral Aviation Consulting. Check out their upcoming free workshops.
    www.astralaviationconsulting....
    Thumbnail image courtesy George Code/Coepilot
    My website
    www.jonhunt.net

КОМЕНТАРІ • 21

  • @FlyingDarkLord
    @FlyingDarkLord 4 місяці тому +7

    Will the CAA listen to our suggestions if they ignored our feelings on shared expenses? 🤔

  • @neilcharlton
    @neilcharlton 4 місяці тому +2

    You can thank wingly for this. Once wingly flights started the complaints to the CAA went through the roof !

  • @justincoleman4133
    @justincoleman4133 4 місяці тому +1

    Jon, Ive followed you for a few years and as a fellow ex TV person, it’s great to see how modern and polished your production standards have become!

  • @andycampbell5491
    @andycampbell5491 4 місяці тому

    like you I have fitted a quality household CO monitor fitted to my Saratoga. it has a10 year life, and sits in a convenient place low down in the cockpit. I believe it to be a non brainer for the minimal cost.

  • @theflyingfool
    @theflyingfool 4 місяці тому +3

    The most infuriating thing the CAA does is use obtuse language in their communications. I really wish they would use plain English and get someone to proof read the damn stuff to ensure its meaning is crystal clear.

  • @iainmillar1532
    @iainmillar1532 3 місяці тому

    Always amazed me that wingly was legal. But it’s a real pain if I want to go for a flip with a mate and have to get them to sign declarations..

  • @NDCDA62
    @NDCDA62 4 місяці тому +4

    The CAA FIS should replicate that of the German FIS which is absolutely first class, provides radar service and ensures greater safety in the air.

    • @janmoons1958
      @janmoons1958 4 місяці тому +1

      That's correct...but have you also tried our Belgian FIS "Brussels Information"? In my humble opinion, they offer much more support for traffic warnings and communication is strictly in English only.

    • @NDCDA62
      @NDCDA62 4 місяці тому +2

      @@janmoons1958 Indeed, a few years ago I navigated by VFR the complicated airspace into Antwerp. Belgium FIS as well as France are equally as good.

  • @TheLincolnshireFlyer
    @TheLincolnshireFlyer 4 місяці тому

    Thanks Jon. Great update as usual 👍😀

  • @kevchilton908
    @kevchilton908 4 місяці тому

    Thank you, Jon 👌🏻👍🏻

  • @jamesb777driver
    @jamesb777driver 4 місяці тому

    Thanks John

  • @glennwatson
    @glennwatson 4 місяці тому +2

    The crash over guernsey was way more complicated than CO poisoning. The pilot was not current, a private pilot only conducting charter, had a restricted instrument rating which had lapsed. Aircraft issues which he ignored. Active CO detector make sense though

    • @RoamingAdhocrat
      @RoamingAdhocrat 4 місяці тому +1

      was that the one where the passenger was a footballer?

    • @flyingmortgageman
      @flyingmortgageman 4 місяці тому +2

      yes I just watched Hovers debrief on that as well. Crazy stuff.

    • @Prefect99
      @Prefect99 4 місяці тому +1

      and none of these rules would have prevented it.

  • @lsx280
    @lsx280 4 місяці тому

    What is the point of surveying public opinion if it is duly ignored?

  • @flyingmortgageman
    @flyingmortgageman 4 місяці тому

    It is all confusing especially for new pilots. So far I have never asked for any contribution from PAX as so far they have all been family members. However I had my wrist slapped by the company i charter from as i posted a Instagram video showing my 20 year old daughter with her hands on the wheel and mine waving showing her flying. They said that I am not a qualified instructor so this is not allowed even for the brief moment it happened. There was me thinking showing her how to fly was a good safety thing so she knew what to do if anything happened to me! As for cost sharing it is something I have been thinking about as i have a number of fiends have asked me to take them up. I have always so far declined and certainly did not realise i could have had them pay all but a pound! Cheep way of getting your hours up! Thanks for the info.

    • @Prefect99
      @Prefect99 4 місяці тому

      They're idiots, no need to be an instructor. Find somewhere with less Nazis, you're the customer, vote with your wallet.

  • @openbabel
    @openbabel 4 місяці тому

    The CAA now needs restructuring and removal of most of these restrictive requirements on PPL operations to promote manufacturing and use in the industry. This is a good example of how out of date government quangos could be shutdown to save the taxpayers money,.

  • @jasonkirk7802
    @jasonkirk7802 4 місяці тому +1

    Active CO monitors are a good idea. They are fitted as standard in Robinson helicopters.