Вся та армия конечно мощь и сила и порвала бюджет и страну,какие задачи кроме учений она выполняла?Чехословакия и Польша?Вот Брежневы и тд виноваты что армия была сильная ,а в итоге пало не нато а ссср
Эх тогда надо было все направить в бой!!!до Ла-Манша и дальше а не ждать с моря погоды!!! Ну шо дождалась....это был единственный шанс и мы его проибали
soviet ground force was designed for fast and deep strikes. soviet infantry was fully mechanised (BMP/Mt-Lb) and motorized (BTR) all infantry divisons have tank and self-propelled arty support (soviets never breed large amount of ill-suited for warfare light infantry divisions like US and other West armies does.) russians have SBRN batalion in division and company in regiment. Russians were ready for that scenario.
Bastante interesante y bastante cansado 😩 lla no duermo pensando 💭 en mi vida y en ti diana 🎯 locaso estoy por vos la fuerza 💪 que te quiero ayudar a ser feliz en tiendo mejor que nunca te quiero olvidar oí estamos juntos mañana no sesave yo no puedo seguir así ai que aser algo soy el rey del mundo 🌏 gracias por darme tu corazón ♥
Untis, MTOEs. In 81 USSR was wastly superior. In terms of operational and tactical mobility and firepower. your "holy NATO" placed hungreds of nuke land mines in a lands West Germany (mainstay of NATO, home for 1/3 NATO troops) to stop hipothetical "Red Horde" treat. In East Germany was deployed 20 armoured divisions with more mobile, agile and protected force, and more agile MTOE system optimised for both defensive and offensive operations in conventional and nuclear war.
Back then, Soviet Union still had the will and means to stage a massive exercise to scare her East European holdings into submission, though probably not the wherewithal to actually carry one out (Andropov actually said that military intervention in Poland is non-starter, if it means losing Poland, so be it.). Fast-forward 10 years, Warsaw Pact went away without much of a whimper, 2 years later, Soviet disintegrated with barely a shot fired. Lesson learned: there are plenty of people willing to die in a war, but decades of stagnation can and will reduce the will to defend anything to nothing: if the price of not having to go back is to see your country collapse, so be it, said by Moscow citizens and Soviet soldiers.
I was thought we talking about past. Still NATO and USA has no potential to fight russia in conventional war. read Mil Balance 2011. current NATO is just 1\3 of nato in 80. "succesful deploy them is another" we can. Well Russia Military complex have ability to produce all kind of pieces of mil equipment. All of then,from personell clothing to aircraft carriers and supercruise strategic bombers.
А ведь это всё передовая техника на то время. А сегодня ничего нет кроме арматы которую так и не запустят в масс производство и ПВО камаза или как его там, ну еще джип есть. ахахах
Nato havent even SAM to protect their military instalations. "Tactical nuclear rockets that Russia has can be intercepted with no problem" with what? with tacticool looking cannon fodder?
You can't just generalize that all NATO equipment is technically superior. There were many areas in which USSR was superior. Funny that you mention tanks,because in tank design NATO specifically trailed, even in qualitative terms.T-72 in Iraq was purposely downgraded, so dont judge on that(google"monkey model").T-64 was first tank to use composite armor/fully automated fire control,T-80U with kontakt-5best protected tank in world ntil 2000.Oh USSR had best ATGM missile tech,and dont forget mig31
Eric N lol, firstly learn, then say something - in Iraq it was an export version of T72 without reactive armor, compsite armor and with very VERY shitty version of the shittiest soviet prototype shells with 260-340mm of penetration, whereas soviet T72s had pen from 380 to more then 600mm. In 70s, when new soviet tanks T72 and T80 appeared, west was inferior because they've had less armor and worse 105mm gun, when Abrams appeared in 1979, it was also not better then T80 because it still had 105mm gun wich changed only in 1985, when muricans bought license on production of german 120mm L44 gun. Whole 60s and 70s USSR was superior in tank force, and maybe even in 50s
Да никто никуда не ложил, не сочиняй. Это следствие того, когда форма (духовный идеализм на ценности человека) не соответствует содержанию (материализм). Шкурники-предатели заместили идеалистов-патриотов во власти и уничтожили всё в своих корыстных интересах. Ну а запад твой лишь оказал поддержку гнили.
I have a military education. soviet army in 80-85 was vastly superior to NATO in all aspects . soviet operational tactics were more sophisticated, they have concept of joint operationl regional command, they fielded deep stryke strategy. they have 600 thousand young men with actual combat experience. Only Facts, no emotions.
I did my military service in Sweden in 87 and we had a great respect for the Soviet army. Now I wonder if we actually had anything to fear? The Soviet/Russian system doesn't seem to lend itself to anything else than massive "we will drench the enemy in our own blood"-style mass attacks with mass casualties like in WW2.
Служу Советскому Союзу !
Велик и могуч был Советский Союз.
Эх Михаил Сергеевич, встретить бы тебя на улице...
Да была у него привычка "ходить в народ"...
Пока, говорят, один случайный мужичок ему в репу не заехал...
Да Михал Сергееич получил союз уже в штопоре.
Вот это армия, вот это мощь!
Товарищу Огаркову мое безмерное уважение.
Всю эту мощь создал Л.И.Брежнев. Сам тоже участвовал в ВОВ. Знал он что создавал и что защищал. Это армия могла порвать любого.
Вся та армия конечно мощь и сила и порвала бюджет и страну,какие задачи кроме учений она выполняла?Чехословакия и Польша?Вот Брежневы и тд виноваты что армия была сильная ,а в итоге пало не нато а ссср
Эх тогда надо было все направить в бой!!!до Ла-Манша и дальше а не ждать с моря погоды!!! Ну шо дождалась....это был единственный шанс и мы его проибали
Great Soviet Army!!! The best in all the world!!!
Ahah gum and jinses was destroying the country in 1991. I hate USSR.
@@nazarnazarov1838 fuck you
Где были КГБ, ГРУ? Горбачёва, Яковлева, Андропова к стенке!
Ну Андропов тут причём? это Горбачев и Ельцин, это они Предали Государство и Союз!
Да и Горбачев уже сам отошёл в мир Инной.
какой мощь, какой сила вот тебе держава!!!! Америка недостигнит такого силу.
All time favorite Tune and Soviet union 😍😍😍
Запомни, Россия таким великим как при СССР не будет.
Steta sto ovo nije upotrebljeno na vreme zapad bi bio zbrisan SSSR bi jos uvek postojao a verujem da bi i bivsa SFRJ bila cela!!!
soviet ground force was designed for fast and deep strikes. soviet infantry was fully mechanised (BMP/Mt-Lb) and motorized (BTR) all infantry divisons have tank and self-propelled arty support (soviets never breed large amount of ill-suited for warfare light infantry divisions like US and other West armies does.) russians have SBRN batalion in division and company in regiment. Russians were ready for that scenario.
Супер!
Всегда должен быть настолько точной и так. Бог спасти мать России и ее славной армии
I miss good old days
Bastante interesante y bastante cansado 😩 lla no duermo pensando 💭 en mi vida y en ti diana 🎯 locaso estoy por vos la fuerza 💪 que te quiero ayudar a ser feliz en tiendo mejor que nunca te quiero olvidar oí estamos juntos mañana no sesave yo no puedo seguir así ai que aser algo soy el rey del mundo 🌏 gracias por darme tu corazón ♥
Untis, MTOEs. In 81 USSR was wastly superior. In terms of operational and tactical mobility and firepower. your "holy NATO" placed hungreds of nuke land mines in a lands West Germany (mainstay of NATO, home for 1/3 NATO troops) to stop hipothetical "Red Horde" treat. In East Germany was deployed 20 armoured divisions with more mobile, agile and protected force, and more agile MTOE system optimised for both defensive and offensive operations in conventional and nuclear war.
Такое может повторить только Китай.а нам только завидывать и не обосратся
Уже никто не сможет.
Только в далёком будущем возможно.
Great USSR!
Из компьютерной игры Red Alert 3.Soviet Marsh вроде называется
На обороне как было так и будет.
Поменяли все это на колу и джинсы.
🚩🚩
СЛАВА РОССИИ СЛАВА ПУТИНА,ЗА РОССИЮ ЗА НАШУ ОБЩУЮ ИДЕЮ,МЫ ВМЕСТЕ СИЛА,АРМЕНИЯ И АРМЯНСКИЙ НАРОД С ВАМИ,РОССИЯ И АРМЕНИЯ БРАТЬЯ
вертушки так же пересекали керч пролив в таком же боевом порядке 2014........красота
Cool
Back then, Soviet Union still had the will and means to stage a massive exercise to scare her East European holdings into submission, though probably not the wherewithal to actually carry one out (Andropov actually said that military intervention in Poland is non-starter, if it means losing Poland, so be it.). Fast-forward 10 years, Warsaw Pact went away without much of a whimper, 2 years later, Soviet disintegrated with barely a shot fired. Lesson learned: there are plenty of people willing to die in a war, but decades of stagnation can and will reduce the will to defend anything to nothing: if the price of not having to go back is to see your country collapse, so be it, said by Moscow citizens and Soviet soldiers.
whats the name of the song????
Red alert 3 soviet march
After 6 years...)
Да знаю, я я просто этого цыгана троллю.
I was thought we talking about past.
Still NATO and USA has no potential to fight russia in conventional war. read Mil Balance 2011. current NATO is just 1\3 of nato in 80.
"succesful deploy them is another"
we can.
Well Russia Military complex have ability to produce all kind of pieces of mil equipment. All of then,from personell clothing to aircraft carriers and supercruise strategic bombers.
А ведь это всё передовая техника на то время. А сегодня ничего нет кроме арматы которую так и не запустят в масс производство и ПВО камаза или как его там, ну еще джип есть. ахахах
Такой армии больше не будет ска (
1/6 часть суши+ весь бывший соцлагерь
Name song please..
+717399 soviet march
+orphan crippler Thanks
Red Alert -3 ussr
Одним махом могли вь....ать пол мира!!
а взяли за щеку((
А можно под этот ролик хорошую советскую военную песню поставить, а не американскую породию - порнуху?
Nato havent even SAM to protect their military instalations.
"Tactical nuclear rockets that Russia has can be intercepted with no problem"
with what? with tacticool looking cannon fodder?
бог спасет? зачем тогда армия вообще?
Врет он. Военные у них лучше всех понимают в какой они жопе из-за политиканов и экономистов.
Это все ЧАС на металломе или распроданы варюгами..2020 век у нас дажэ автоматы из пласммасы или пластилина 😄😄😄
Просрали
А в это время водки нет , очереди за колбасой .
в 81м не было очередей. Иди почитай что нибудь. голова как барабан, пустая
😂 half of that shit is made in china toys
You can't just generalize that all NATO equipment is technically superior. There were many areas in which USSR was superior. Funny that you mention tanks,because in tank design NATO specifically trailed, even in qualitative terms.T-72 in Iraq was purposely downgraded, so dont judge on that(google"monkey model").T-64 was first tank to use composite armor/fully automated fire control,T-80U with kontakt-5best protected tank in world ntil 2000.Oh USSR had best ATGM missile tech,and dont forget mig31
Eric N lol, firstly learn, then say something - in Iraq it was an export version of T72 without reactive armor, compsite armor and with very VERY shitty version of the shittiest soviet prototype shells with 260-340mm of penetration, whereas soviet T72s had pen from 380 to more then 600mm. In 70s, when new soviet tanks T72 and T80 appeared, west was inferior because they've had less armor and worse 105mm gun, when Abrams appeared in 1979, it was also not better then T80 because it still had 105mm gun wich changed only in 1985, when muricans bought license on production of german 120mm L44 gun. Whole 60s and 70s USSR was superior in tank force, and maybe even in 50s
Eric N and yes, I know you wrote it 4 years ago, but I still hope you'll read this
Без единого выстрела положили на лопатки эту "мощь" запад
Да никто никуда не ложил, не сочиняй. Это следствие того, когда форма (духовный идеализм на ценности человека) не соответствует содержанию (материализм). Шкурники-предатели заместили идеалистов-патриотов во власти и уничтожили всё в своих корыстных интересах. Ну а запад твой лишь оказал поддержку гнили.
I have a military education. soviet army in 80-85 was vastly superior to NATO in all aspects . soviet operational tactics were more sophisticated, they have concept of joint operationl regional command, they fielded deep stryke strategy. they have 600 thousand young men with actual combat experience. Only Facts, no emotions.
I did my military service in Sweden in 87 and we had a great respect for the Soviet army. Now I wonder if we actually had anything to fear? The Soviet/Russian system doesn't seem to lend itself to anything else than massive "we will drench the enemy in our own blood"-style mass attacks with mass casualties like in WW2.
I died. From laugh. Thanks bro. If some one in Europe want real army capable for big war they must leave NATO and began to rebuild their own military.