How to Stop Cops From Using Apple Vision to Spy on You
Вставка
- Опубліковано 28 вер 2024
- Are cops now able to monitor anyone from anywhere, not just from behind a desk? Apple’s new Vision Pro is making that possible, and it’s happening right now in California
In this video, I break down how this is happening and is it legal for police to use the Apple Technology to create virtual real time centers to spy on you!
❗️DISCLAIMER❗️
This is not legal advice. I AM NOT YOUR LAWYER. Sorry! All content provided is for informational purposes only and not for the purpose of providing legal advice. You should contact your attorney to obtain advice with respect to any particular issue or problem. Nothing here should be construed to form an attorney-client relationship. All non-licensed clips used for fair use commentary, criticism, and educational purposes. See Hosseinzadeh v. Klein, 276 F.Supp.3d 34 (S.D.N.Y. 2017); Equals Three, LLC v. Jukin Media, Inc., 139 F. Supp. 3d 1094 (C.D. Cal. 2015).
Hampton Criminal Lawyers
www.criminalatt...
Fort Worth, TX Location
maps.app.goo.g...
Arlington, TX Location
maps.app.goo.g...
Arrested in Texas? Get a Free Case Analysis: www.criminalat...
Free Guides:
Ultimate Guide to DWI Defense in Texas: www.criminalat...
What to Do When Charged with Domestic Violent Crime: www.criminalat...
How to Beat a Drug Charge in Texas: www.criminalat...
Road pirates have always been enemies of humanity. It’s terrifying how the masses openly support, encourage, and enable them.
Propaganda, perfected by the Germans of the early 1940's, is a powerful tool for controlling the unaware masses.
Use their data against them. They live on the same planet and are NOT immune to these techniques themselves. Be Smart and act accordingly.
@@TheTubejunky We have a private contract with our sheriffs department for neighborhood security. They are LEO and subject to the same laws while performing contract work as public work, so their body cameras have to be on and the GPS in their cars have to be active. You should see how pissed they got when one resident filed a FOI (Freedom Of Information) request for body cam recordings and GPS data on their cars. It was hilarious. They constantly hide behind dumpsters in the neighborhood for hours on end, sleeping. They rarely patrol. They absolutely do not like being looked at, especially through their own equipment.
@@Threedog1963 I think what is meant is a citizen science project using ALPR to flag police's private vehicles, etc.
The body cam / GPS FOIA thing is exactly what I would have suspected though given Warren v DC precedent.
Dumb conception of reality
All I wanted was hoverboards
And automatic shoe laces
Don’t forget the auto dry jacket
Yeah? Well why don't you make like a tree, and git outta here!
See? It’s your fault mister .
But got dystopia instead
i am reminded of what Benjamin Franklin said “Those who would give up essential Liberty, to purchase a little temporary Safety, deserve neither Liberty nor Safety” comes to mind.
Those words have never been more true than in 2024 and the sheep are voting for it.
@@Tankeryanker339 Not so true. Today its No Safety!
You are missing the most important quote about the 200-year deadline. And what would happen if it didn't happen.
@@dead2802 I know it not safe
I'm sure that Franklin would be a little horrified at the multiple ways that humans currently have developed to be monsters to each other far beyond what they had in his day. Besides, that quote had nothing to do with this issue when he first used it. It was about the right of the _local_government_ to lay taxes on its lands in perpetuity (the "essential liberty") to be sold for outside assistance with frontier defense from current aggressors (the "temporary safety"). The relinquishment of the "essential liberty" was permanent. The "temporary safety" was not. Not matter what the context is that sounds like a bad deal.
Just think what could happen if they have an axe to grind with a lawyer, a judge, another cop, an ex-spouse or anyone else. Food for thought... "Whose watching the watchers?"
Who’s watching the watchmen?
‘’
@@jeffstone2585 The watchers are watching the watchmen.
@@jeffstone2585only a dirty cop, or their supporters would want to know that.
Who's learning English? 😂😂😂
@@BlackJesus8463 Lol.. That's what I was gonna Say..Nice.
i love how people say we are living in the safest time ever, yeah at the cost of our rights. being over policed is never a good thing.
Safest time? When I was a kid I was able to go all over without supervision. Kids now have to have a parent with them at all times
@@jerrebrasfield4231 i know dude, but mass media would have you believe we are. that's what i was referring to.
@@jerrebrasfield4231exactly it’s way more dangerous in 2024 and we have less freedom.
And IT'S A LIE! THERE IS FAR MORE MURDER GRAPE ROBBERIES PER CAPITA NOW THAN AT ANY POINT IN US HISTORY!
And the more they disarm the populace the worse it will get! We now for the first time in American history have South American gangs taking over entire rental buildings at gunpoint! We now have South American gangs running entire parts of towns and cities! We have Muslim Shari enforcers marching the streets in some towns and cities and THAT IS ON TOP OF THE CRIME WE ALWAYS HAD!!
The drug abuse in this country is absolutely the highest its ever been at ANY point in our history! With one drug in particular coming across the border that is so powerful that a gallon jug full could wipe out an entire city! And our borders are wide open!
@@demonpride1975 Mass media is the reasons people think it's so dangerous out there today. Think about it. We're exposed to an ever-widening array of current violent events because violence sells news. The media simply didn't have the same access to violent stories "when I was a kid" that they do today. When you get shown all the gory details of all the violent crimes from every small corner of the country it's hard to believe that anyone is safe out there. I'm not saying it's perfect out there, but the homicide rate now is much lower per capita compared to the late 60's through the mid 90's than it is higher than the "golden safe years" of the 40's through the 60's. Even the child abduction scares of the 80's were way overblown because of the sensationalist scaremongers in the news made it look like it was happening everywhere. Let's not even go too far into the basically non-connected crimes all attributed to the "Satanic Panic" just because it sold newspapers and advertising slots like wildfire.
Dangerous Freedom or Tyrannical Safety...you cant have both.
Dont get it do you? Knock the words Freedom and Safety. There is neither NOW! Dang. Tyranny. Now do you get it? face reality!
@@dead2802I will take dangerous freedom. I am more likely to be on par with freedom, than to be defending myself form the overwhelming force of our current government.
Freedom.
Is safety
Tyrannical is dangerous
You Got it backwards and twisted bud
Tyranny offers safety but it's more dangerous than anything. Look at the body counts of Lenin, Stalin, Moa etc
For your safety is to eliminate your rights.
Under Color of Law.
So how can I stop cops using Apple Vision to spy me? You didn't answer that.
💯
We will have to buy it for 1000, of dollars n see how it works, don’t worry criminal one step ahead of them
I close my curtains on my house at night, and tinted the wondows on my car. I want to remain private.
That's why we use your wifi to scan where you and things are.
@@mr.otterpockets3854 TEMPEST is a pain, even without WiFi your HDMI, SATA, etc cables can do the same though with a shorter range.
Then there is the fun of the L-3 Cyterra Range-R, that works even if you take on the Amish philosophy.
Don't worry, IR and Thermal cameras can't really see though walls. I don't know where the commentator got that idea, but it isn't true. Like any other camera, what they see is surfaces. Now if your house was poorly insulated and you leaned against a wall for a half our or something, long enough for the wall to get warm on the outside, maybe they could, but if you are inside of your house seated in a chair, neither of these camera types will detect you.
And in some states half of what you do is illegal specifically the tint on your windows
FUMAR is old anti-grow house tech for planes . Duncan was the test . It’s used more often than you think . Most people live in denial .
They're using this technology also on auditors who are auditing law enforcement😮
I think you mean miss using
This wouldn't be an issue if officers had proven themselves trustworthy, and were held accountable instead of hiding behind their qualified immunity. So long as it is "rules for thee but not for me", there is no trust. In case people haven't been paying attention, recently a Florissant (Missouri) Police Department officer recently took 'adult' pictures that were on a woman's phone during a traffic stop without her knowing. Even though he was found out, it would be naive to think he's the only one willing to abuse his power ...Now imagine if he had this kind of surveillance?
Micromanaging the few remaining trustworthy makes everyone complicit in the one-size fits all anarchy agenda.
I've heard of towns offering residents with Ring doorbells to "opt in" so officers can view their camera feeds. I think most residents envisioned this as an 'as needed, after the fact" situation. Not a 24/7 feed monitored, recorded and analyzed continuously.
Don't use any of those internet connected devices inside your house! Some people use them to keep track of their kids. It's not worth it!
Sure that no child predator or peeking tom will get law enforcement job to use this tech to gather pics for dark web sales.
@@Maybe-So you can use it, just dont let anyone know you have it.
Cops don't need permission to spy.
Or tapping in to your camera at home and then they paying community residents to help them too and blackmailing. Remember police are just humans just like us and can use it off duty become obsessed and got ppl involved to stalk you and accessing your cameras inside your home or even planting them without consent. Placing them on trees closer to your windows or using those drones smh anyone can do shyt bc they be spying on me and hacked my WiFi by stealing my private WiFi with free WiFi I didn’t sign up for
UA-cam won’t allow me to say what I will do to a law enforcement officer wearing these outside my house. Don’t doubt me LEOs. I almost died last year and discovered it’s nothing to fear. What I do fear is the endless slide into tyranny we are experiencing. I would rather die than live in the world we are about to create.
Amen bro good Americans need to get together and have a meeting of the minds no phones it's getting about that time
most definately!!!!!!! Snowden was a hero.
And while the officer is standing there with the headset on someone, not me, is coming up behind him and lifting his wallet.
😂😂😂😂😂
Or worse, his sidearm.
lol
Or his life
"lifting his wallet".
I haven't heard that euphemism before....
Courage from the Supreme Court? Never.
TBF, they do have courage to flip us the bird.
C'mon man, that constitution is in tricky english.
The gangstalkers and perps are getting out of hand with privacy violations.
Funny how a comment can get deleted by youtube just describing stuff cops do lol
the current SCOTUS has said that precedents are not binding.
The line was drawn in 1776. Unfortunately the People have become to yellow and weak to hold it, let alone push back.
A nation of sheep will beget a government of wolves. Edward R. Murrow.
Here in Chinada also..
"Become too yellow" You included
The movie Minority Report is becoming real everyday!
Of course, the People’s Republic of California would be the first place to test any technology that would be used to surveil the peasants, while not giving one shit about the constitutionality.
But a guy up the comment list said that California wouldn't arrest them anyway. You Fox Propaganda watchers need to get your stories straight.
They're gonna get sued so bad until they'll have to trash that method for tagging the WRONG person.
And they WIIL no doubt. Big Brother.
Nah l doubt it, they'll claim immunity.
No, this is the Sole purpose of Ai, and digital currency.... They will remove "due process" in this way...
Just wait, adobe can manipulate a Live streaming video with accurate animation in real time so that the video can make you do anything they program it too and thus manufacture Fake Evidence.
Hahaha. Good one. The police will claim they acted in good faith and the courts will gladly back them up. Any lawsuit will result in a small payout from the city's insurance and no change in behavior. At best you'll hear about "retraining" which means nothing.
"The FBI Spends a Lot of Time Spying on Black Americans." ~Oct. 29, 2019.
Screwing around in poor black neighborhoods with bio warfare.
All Americans there is cameras everywhere they can access phone cameras anytime but you guys are always the victim even though everything is rigged for you guys to thrive while we're handicapped by reverse discrimination by dei affirmative action huge tax breaks for companies to hire minorities lower test scores for college jobs so it s not the best man for the job with most experience or the hardest worker and you say anything to them they pull the race card make complaints threaten to sue so now we got a bunch of lazy under qualified under skilled overpriced people staring at phones why the others pick up the slack and extra workload ya poor you
I’m not worried about the police. I’m worried about the legislators.
Privacy violations.
There may be other countries where public safety is of utmost concern, but here in the United States, privacy is in our DNA. We want the government staying out of our business!
Good luck with all of that.
The difference is that you own all that data in other countries. You don’t in the U.S.
@@schoolingdiana9086 yes and it’s a shame that our data is just out there
Tell that to all the ppl that rolled over for covid & gave up their medical privacy for a job or to go to the movies.
Anything these cops see while "spying" through walls will instantly be dismissed due to invasion of privacy and should instantly be reversed and cops should be criminally charged
I believe that it is reasonable to expect that my private information such as name, address, birthday.... will not be surrendered just because I walk on a public sidewalk.
Theres a county in Florida that goes way further than this, the sheriff basically has everything in his town monitored, real time command center, very dystopian.
Isn't this aka being a "targetted individual"?
I think you are missing the mark here. The VR headset makes no difference in what police are allowed to see. The same restrictions on what cameras they are allowed to access without a warrant is unchanged. The Apple headset doesn’t magically give them access to all cameras. All this does is present data they already have access to in a different way.
That's what I came to say.
Of course, the next step will be to add social media feeds and then then they'll want cell data.
“Monitor” is the key here. Its not about law enforcement. Its about managing people. This all sets up for 15 minute cities and a global panopticon. Shouldn’t WE be monitoring our elected officials??
Law enforcement and corrupt politicians are violating our 4th amendment right. We ask the Supreme Court justices in Washington D.C. Supreme Court to protect the American citizen and to safe guard the Constitution.
They have had this technology forever. Our cellphones existed in the 1970s. Here are my concerns with this technology. Kids. I can careless they watch me. What about the kids? They have recorded us our whole lives. I am not joking. Our planet is sick.
This is just one of many reasons to not live in California.
@@gordonburton6721 What state do you live in?
This is the real reason they banned lead paint.
Not 'seeing' the difference between using the Apple VR and any squad car laptop or handheld device. Same data, different display format. Still requires a CPU to do the heavy lifting. The VR device is tethered to that CPU.
the society is becoming a scary place .
Right now cops use a gun as the first tool .
Infrared emitter's can saturate a cameras CCD, rendering the camera useless, and Infrared is invisible to the naked eye...creating privacy
The machine has achieved total central control.
There are already Supreme Court opinions saying they can't use technology to do this. One of them considers a drug sniffing dog on your porch as impermissible technology.
Thank you so much for your informative videos. I have learned so much on this channel. I am over 60 and never thought I needed to know about law stuff until I had a neighbor who works as a snitch for police and he gets paid to destroy people's lives. Mine included. I was jailed for simply standing in my front yard . It was dismissed but it has done so much permanent damage to my mental health , I now have so much anxiety that it is impossible for me to go out into my yard anymore. My grass got so high I had to bush hog like a hay field. I never go to town without a body cam, dash cam, a slingshot and two throwing knives. I have been harassed for over 4 years . I filed a federal lawsuit against them mainly to keep them from making me go missing. I have talked to the FBI and I have filed every complaint imaginable. I can not rely on police if something happens out here. I have been terrified every winter because I have to store hay in my second carport ( for my horses) I'm afraid they will burn my house down. I don't have family or friends in this town so no one would ever miss me. God I wish I were in Texas but I'm in the same federal circuit as you. Mississippi can't be any worse than dying then going to hell. I miss my country. 😢
The FBI is not on your side. 😂
May God protect you. I know very well what you mean. I'll pray for you
Yeah I found out but nobody can say that I didn't go through every step tho.@@Carl_McMelvin
@@ismeniaelidossantosmorgado Thank you ❤
@@Carl_McMelvin I found out
NEVER TRUST A COP
Hell, they can run your plates without probable cause now. That is a violation of the 4th..If I cannot run people's plates they should not be able to either.
The plates do NOT belong to you>>they belong to the state so the state can do whatever they want with them.
I thought I paid my own money (taxed of course) for those plates though.
@@b_rad_tunes-n-stuff6421 It is a tax. Come to find out in their codes and CFR's it is all voluntary unless you are hired by the STATE or the U.S. FEDERAL CORPORATION to be an AGENT, EMPLOYEE or OFFICER with AUTHORITY for them. Then you are required to have a DRIVER LICENSE to DRIVE their MOTOR VEHICLES.
@@hotpuppy1 Yeah. It is voluntary to get a TITLE to REGISTER and INSURE it. I have their CODES to prove that. They are lying to us that it is required or mandatory.
@@rebelstudio2720it’s only mandatory if you want to drive on public streets, which are owned by the state, who GRANTS us the PRIVILEGE TO use them. We pay taxes in myriad ways, to fund the govt such that it can provide resources in the best interest of the collective of US citizens. The govt exists to save us from ourselves
just when you think cali cant possibly get any worse
Shouldn't be too difficult to jam the wireless cameras at the very least. There are portable devices which possess the capability to do so. Legally questionable, but so is the excessive surveillance.
Turn off your router, it uses your Wi-Fi to map and access you
Courts need to up date definition. Casting a net to catch future crimes without warrant is unconstitutional...
I have a paint that blocks flir f them
A paint? Interesting.
Can you give us the details for this paint?
The reason they got rid of lead paint
Uuuh that stuff is 300$ and ounce
@@blastingcapps4341 This has nothing to do with getting rid of lead paint. You're off by decades in technology. It had everything to do with children eating the paint flakes and that caused permanent brain damage. Lead is really bad stuff. Lead in paint tastes sweet. It was everywhere when I was a child. So was leaded gasoline and many other terrible things.
Maryland had a lot of bad cases. They also passed crazy laws on leaded paint. It's a pain in the butt when I buy a house that was built before 1979. I have to prove it's safe. Funny thing, leaded paint was an exterior paint though it is routinely found inside houses. I presume they ran out of interior and used what was on the truck. It's expensive to abate.
I wonder if Apple can be sued for not disclosing this information.
Sooo... *_How do we stop it?_* That was the title of the video, right? "How to stop Police from..." Yada Yada Yada? IDK. Maybe change the title?
Also dont forget 1984 and Judge Dredd
Blue line gestapo
So glad I moved to Mexico
We plan to move back asap. It was the right decision before, and relief to get there once again!
it follows
Then the CIA NSA HSA get it and they don't like the T shirt or NRA hat someone is wearing so they look him up, check his meta and social media accounts, etc. They then can harass or apply lawfare.
Or a dirty cop what's to get info on a beautiful woman he sees in a store, pulls up her address, marital status, frequent places, etc
I doubt cop are smart enough to even be able to use the headset.
We need to take law enforcement officers out of the role of tax collectors & back into the role of crime stoppers. They are human and as such will follow the path of least resistance. It is far easier to fleece the "fish in the barrel" public with tickets and fines then go out and physically catch criminals. We need our police to do real police work again.
"Enhanced" is a good word. Remember "Enhanced Interrogation Techniques?" Only fools would not be scared. But, Apple will have their PR department rename this to something softer. Maybe "Embracing neighborhood safety?" "Neighborhood family safety initiative?" You would think that with using the cameras, we could reduce the police force by 80%. That might be a fair trade. Lower property taxes by $3,000 per year since they are surveilling with the cameras that you and your neighbors bought at your own expense.
Civil asset forfeiture is out of control and now they want real time video? Pretty soon every bank withdrawal will be considered drug money and seized a few blocks from the bank.
This technology is OK for now, however, I’m not OK with technology like drones being used for general surveillance. We need strict rules on how this technology can be used. We don’t have that right now. The trouble is civilians are already heavily restricted to the point of a joke in terms of where we can fly a drone, but police have almost no restrictions on them. That’s not right.
Just wait until you find out that they're accessing your DVRs and ring cams as well as smart televisions and watching you inside your home and they're accessing your smartphones and listening to your phone conversations and looking at you through your camera lens and going through your saved files on your computer and your smartphones and tablets/PC. You're home late one night touching yourself in front of the television set and the next thing you know you're blasted all over the internet and don't even know how you got there 🤷🏽
Just give them a good show..😅
Apple EULA: Allow us to introduce ourselves.
Turning police state in the state that claims to represent "defunding police."
Sure, they "need" a warrant. But realistically, they do it anyway. They only need the warrant if they want to use the evidence collected.
It’s not gonna matter how a court ruled, police will use it anyway, then manufacture a legit way to arrest.
I don't want to deny police tools, the problem is the stealthiness of the cameras. What we need is a law requiring any camera the police use to display a light at a set frequency and intensity that is viewable from the direction the camera faces. This way you would at least know if an area is under surveillance.
Police would be able to bypass the light requirement only with a warrant.
Somewhat agree. It's the inevitable abuse of those tools that requires the public to put strict restraints on the servants.
Solar curtains can help a bit to mitigate the spying.
Everyone knows how to solve this problem. Can’t type it out.
Make them afraid.
All animals are equal, but some animals are more equal than others.
Animal Farm quote... nice... people should watch that movie as a child... I know mine did... just so they know what's going on
They are already doing that in Corvallis Oregon and Albany Oregon and we're starting to see that all over😮
If our privacy were a concern, the Patriot Act wouldn’t be a thing. The use of this technology will continue to expand because it works in the interest of the government (Big Brother).
It's like the movie Anon on Netflix. As a Targeted Individual I can tell you that the government is already using Wifi Sensing based through-the-wall cameras that are augmented with AI that creates a 3D real time virtual model of people inside their homes and can even see them naked even if they have clothes on and even if they're lying in bed under the covers. I believe they use the AI to add color to the 3D model and that they can use VR goggles to virtually come into your room and lie down with you. I could tell you stories. Basically, there are no walls anymore.
What about drones I think the FAA needs to get involved and show flight paths for them just like they do planes registration and everything
Was this clickbait? I thought we would learn how to stop it.
One thing I would say is that if the cop could stand there he could look through a camera from there. At the same time I know they will have a tendency to use it for nefarious reasons, and for that reason there should be major limitations on their use. For instance they could be able to look in real time at any time, but if they want to see past footage a warrant is in order, because that could be considered a search.
They are going to vr the donut shop and eat vr donuts. They will use the equipment to watch the donuts come out of the oven.
Reminds me of the Will Smith/Gene Hackman movie Enemy of the State.
Violation of privacy, stalking & harassment on & in private property w/o warrant using technology. Officer permitted to use this technology should be monitored by 3 other officers using the same technology. Checks and balances.
The Fed: apple vision? That's so 1996
In my city, the police use drones frequently to monitor us along with their helicopters every couple hours
All you need is lead paint. Fun fact- that’s why they got rid of lead paints and not due to children chewing on the paint chips.
Strange they want to put them selfs in that position with such overwhelming snooping any crime that those occur is likely because they allow it I ha whole squad following and creeping on me for a couple years now the made blatantly obvious they were doing this to me to cause some sort of psychological damage of some kind they had there snitches burned out entire tires right in front of me to have me traumatized sometimes they would jump me I still don't understand why all of sudden they started putting all this attention on me im not even a criminal but it's still annoying as fuck having to deal with it
It’s likely this technology will lead to police focusing less on crime prevention and more on opportunities for asset seizures.
You know that’s right. Great point
Gee I thought Apple was the people’s phone provider
The headset is a red herring, here. It doesn't provide them with anything more than what a computer will. The issue is the visual and audio recording devices feeding the information. This is equivalent to saying the ATF would shoot fewer dogs if they only carried revolvers. (The ATF, not the dogs.)
Jokes on them , nobody wants to see what I’m doin in here .
No one has a reasonable expectation of privacy. Not even while in your own house.
I love your knowledge and information to the people. I survived racist terrorist attacks from certain San Fernando police departments officers in California and perpetrators they coexist with to harm people and children. I was a minor in a town fair and defended a dark skin Mexican Asian kid from a white supremacy bully kid who has ties to racist officers. I became the victim and fought for my life in the hospital with two to three hundred bullet holes in my body. I remember how the officers laughed at me as I was dying in the sidewalk. I never received any criminal or civil justice for the attempted murder I survived! My brother in-law Tom McConnell a security sheriff officer in Lancaster college called deputies on me because I was talking about my ordeals and injustices. The deputies holded me hostage and physically harmed me before letting me go! Tom McConnell told me he stole military explosives from his ex army job. I wonder if he told me that to intimidate me from speaking about my ordeals?!. I also remember a LAPD OFFICER out of nowhere stopped me and asked to see my cellphone and email without any warrant from judge and for no reason! He intimidated me and threatened me to arrest me if I wouldn’t let him see my cellphone and emails! So I did under threat of violence towards me and freedom taken from me! He seemed very creepy! Not sure if he was another kkk officer or kkk child predator officer? And another time a few detectives from LAPD arrested as a minor for a murder they swear I committed. They were so horribly wrong! I almost got life in prison as a minor if they convince me to sign a paper saying I did. Thank goodness i didn’t and it seemed that another detective team caught the murderer because they never bothered me again. I also survived two separate child predator attacks! One was committed by a male neighbor and the second was a male youth center teacher. In both I fought back and escaped! I did help DA investigators in the youth center teacher case. Both of the child predators abused many children. Also have been going through and gone through other misconduct or attacks by other officers or officers and perpetrators attacks. At times when I visit 7/11 stores or Albertsons or Vons markets and or other markets like target or Walmart or Walgreens I hear child predators or racist child predators following close to me. At times it seems that it’s people and at times it seems it’s technology through security cameras. Or cellphones.
The rub for me is when they use tech to view what they could not view with their eyes. For instance if you have a small opening in your drapes where no one can see inside from the street. But if they use a drone or a high optical magnification, that would violate the fourth.
A Scanner Darkly
It won't be long before these headsets are outdated. Before long all these cameras will be tied to a central AI system. There will be no driving, walking, talking, or doing anything without being surveilled and recorded in real time, with immediate access to all your activity if police or govt takes an interest in you. This needs to be stopped, these cameras need to go.
So here is my question. If the "public cameras" used to surveil the general public areas all have thermal vison capabilities what is to prevent them from utilizing that aspect to see inside of homes and track your movements within your own home? Sure if they have an actual warrant to do that type of intrusive surveillance it is one thing it is another when they can just turn that feature on and off at their discretion. We all know that will be abuse and because of "qualified immunity" they will get away with it more and more as the technology progresses.
Just like the body cams when they have free reign to turn them on and off or mute them at their discretion it becomes a huge problem in holding them accountable. To me that is tampering with evidence and should be treated as such in the courts.
Hear me out on this: At what point does law enforcement start violating “Geneva Convention” laws against citizens? It seems that citizens are at a disadvantage with this technology. As it is in my state, I can affirm that license plate readers are being used. I can understand technology being used against actual threats, eg terrorist, or serial k*llers, pred@tors, etc… but against the common people, this is overkill. This will become unbalanced to the point where people will fear law enforcement, which in turn will only fuel a “black market” of lawlessness.
Theyd be crazy not to go with a Quest 3 instead, you know how much it hurts wearing the vision for extended periods? Lol not to mention if a bird poops on it that front glass will crack 😂
The LEOs are going to be so involved on what is on the screen, they will lose track of where they are, and dangers approaching them.
Apple vision is not x-ray vision. Citywide cameras help each of us by way of legal defense. Unless you’re committing crimes, of course.
They can use your own Wi-Fi device as if you lived in a glass house with a single light bulb on. As your body moves around the house, you block the Wi-Fi signal. They can easily track that.
This is referred to as Augmented Reality in the military some 10 years ago. The Patriot Act allows interception of data found traveling through the air. If this has been expanded to private networks, it could be a problem
DAM GANGSTALKERS
If you know where they are monitoring from, what stops someone from dropping a signal jammer nearby and walking away?