Yes the Russians don't mess about when they design their weapons systems...there is no soft kill version. The Russians go for the Terminator approach.....:)
For sheer gun power, the Chinese 11-barrelled type 1130 CIWS, is a beast, and a Chinese TV report stated that it could stop incoming anti-ship missiles up to a speed of Mach 4 with a 96% success rate.
Then why did they not show it... The only ones we shoot anything are the American and the Netherland guns while the Russian ones and Chinese one only showed it firing
@@odd_bobble9106 Believe it or not. Checked the latest sea-trial video of the 003 carrier, the model equipped in the carrier are the latest modified version of 1130, came with AESA radar (rectangular antenna iso the old one use disc type antenna), capable of tracking multiple targets and prioritize them according to the threat levels. Its the first of its kind using mini AESA radar on CIWS.
This is primarily a gun or gun-missile CIWS list. There are pure missile CIWS like RAM, Sea-Ram, Barak or Sea Wolf. Sea Wolf is amazing, considering its age.
1. Type 1130 (China) 2: Pantsir (Russia) 3: Type 730 (China) 4. Goalkeeper (Netherlands) 5: Kashtan (Russia) ps. Phalanx shouldn't even be in contention. It uses 20mm which has inferior range to any 30mm ammunition while having lower rate of fire.
Well, 730 is 7 barrels 30mm CIWS which named H/PJ-12, the specs you put are actually 1130 CIWS, H/PJ-11, which means 11 barrels 30mm CIWS, around 11000/min. Don't know too many details about this since it been used in recent Type 052D, 055, and 001, 002 carriers. CCTV actually has some firing footages using that 1130, the footage in this video was blur but I would say it is probably 730 CIWS not 1130 CIWS.
The Phalanx is actually supposed to be a bit weaker than the other CIWS in this list probably due to it using only 20mm shells, rather than the others 30mm shells. Plus Phalanx is popular mainly to the fact it is a cheap option, as it can just literally be bolted onto a deck of a warship, whereas systems like Goalkeeper retrofitted to ships need extensive work inside the ship so it can be fitted.........just ask the Royal Navy.
Phalanx might use a 20mm gun but the main reason its still relevant against these systems and better than weapons like the ak-630 which should be better on paper is its software and tracking abilities within the actual module- which is why sea-ram reuses that module, phalanx is probably a lot more expensive than ak-630, Dardo, etc and equivalent to the weapons on this list. Goalkeeper was probably better than Phalanx in the 80's and 90's, not sure now. Its been phased out in a lot of navies and lost pace with phalanx in some of the navies its continued in service unmodernised in. Phalanx is cheaper to update and support thanks to the support of the larger US arms industry but the goalkeepers that have been modernised in dutch service are probably better pieces of kit
@@lukeallison3713 First of all, AK-630 is not on this list so not really a system to compare with, and the fact that more use it or that it’s cheap or easy to maintain do not say anything about quality. Would like to know what in Phalanx that does it better then Type 1130 as an example, or Goalkeeper.
@@MrCastodian I just said it is in fact updated more frequently than (some of) the 30mm weapons and therefore the 20mm shell disadvantrage is less significant- while goalkeeper, despite its firepower will not have been updated with new blocks. However the type 1130 volume of fire is unprecedented apart from the similarly large kashtan- and if its as accurate as claimed, its clearly miles ahead of phalanx. Actually think western ciws should go in the direction of 35 and 40mm weapons with AHEAD or similar technology while trying to increase fire rate and 57 and 76mm weapons with guided rounds like dart and mad-fires rather than provide an answer to the 1130, its the pinacle of its type of ciws
Before watching the video: Ok, top-5 weapons let me guess... It will include (i) some European (swiss or french) system that looks cool but barely used due to high costs, (ii) modern Russian system that is placed on place 3-5 without even looking at its characteristics, (iii) some 80-s development US system that is put on the №1 spot for propoganda reasons. After watching the video: Wow, I stand corrected! Thanks for the honest video!
You talk about 730 but the info you released is type 1130.... 730 is previous generation product and is a copy of ak630 form Russia .The 1130 is the new generation and should in the top of this list（The only Gatling ciws system with a rate of fire exceeding 10,000 rounds per minute）
Well spotted. I meant to talk about the 1130, forget the 730. Even the footage and the 3D image are the 1130. It was a typing mistake. Apologies and I hope it hasn’t ruined the video for you. Regards
Does anyone know anything about the Leonardo lionfish CIWS? My country( canada is apparently getting new river class destroyers, based of the type 23 frigate. But rather that the phalanx CIWS that is currently on our frigates. The new ones will have 2 lionfish CIWS. I am just wondering if that is a good or bad choice. Thanks all.
Thank you very much. ✌️I have watch a few of your videos, and you earned another subscriber. Cool channel you got there. Good use of synthetic voice. You use Mathew like I do… great choice.👍 good luck with your channel.
Well ! from my point of view i think that the best all round CIWS is Oerlikon Millenium 35mm/1000 rpm Swiss/German made revolver cannon. This system its better than the other gatlingunn CIWS, because it is less complicated, more reliable, maybe less expensive, it have excellent radar and sensors... I think that the only down side would be a ammunition capacity, which would be beetter to increase. In other hand, all gatllingunn systems are good for movies, power demostration, powerfull looking from the outside view, but in real situation thay are not as thay look like.
While i love this "flying tank" hog and it does wonders in close air support to ground troops, i'd never use them to attack a modern ship at close range. It's both slow and not stealthy, it would be instantly picked up by the radar and sent some SAMs at before even getting remotely close to the CIWS range. Only way would be to have enough hogs firing AGMs from different angles around the ship at the same time to both overwhelm the SAM capacity by the hogs number, and overwhelm the CIWS capacity by the incoming AGMs number. (Yeah, Brrrrrute Forrrrce and more Dakka! XD) Don't know the rate of fire for typical ship's SAM, % success of fighters couter-measures against incoming SAM, nor how many AGMs are needed to overwhelm a CIWS, but if supposedly that could even be feasible, this expensive "tactic" would incurr heavy losses on the hogs to score a successful hit on a modern ship, looks like they're just obviously not designed for this role. But as most CIWS have about twice the range than the hog's cannon it would be both suicidal and useless to try a close-range strike.
Hi, what do you think of Turkey's Aselsan Gokdeniz CIWS? Nothing this system has been fitted on all Turkish Naval combat ships and also has been exported to navies of Indonesia, Malaysia and Pakistan. Thank you 🌹
Hi there! The AK-630 is a Soviet and Russian fully automatic naval close-in weapon system based on a six-barreled 30 mm rotary cannon. It’s very good but this list is only top 5. If it was top 10 probably I would place it in 8th place... regards
It's not so efficient to sea skimming missile lik NSM.....it's going subsonic less than 5 m above sea level. Realy hard to detect.....especialy when you hav wave condition! And this missile also have counter measure capabilitys against gatling guns like high rate of manouvring.
Goalkeeper is stroonger than Pphalanx, since 1972 it hardly needed to be upgraded or even unlike the Phalanx it doe snot need multiple versions, it is a multi-purposed system.
I agree with about phanlax on 2, it took a lot of researching and in the end the number of navy’s using it made me decide this way. About the not including rolling airframe, I decided to do this video with gun-based CIWS only... best regards
@@Diversusmilitary How does the number of Navy's using it have anything to do with the ranking? The only thing that says something about is how a certain nation keeps ramming it's military equipment through other countries' throats, and not how effective they are.
To be honest with you, CIWS is not my strongest military subject... after reading many articles, I made this list... if I had included searam on this list probably it would be on top together with phalanx but still the new Russian CIWS in first... please keep your knowledgeable thoughts coming, that’s the way my channel can grow... thank you for your participation. Best regards
You have to keep in mind it's about more than just the gun doing brrrrrrt it's about the whole system. The phalanx might lack in range but it can be bolted down on virtually any ship and is a mostly self-contained unit. As opposed to the goalkeeper which is turret-mounted and therefor partially below decks. Making it less useful/practical for some navy's. Which doesn't hurt the guns performance but it does limit its use. Same for the Chinese one which was only sutable for larger ships.
I wish only if you could rate these system by numbers, not how famous they are. How chinese 11,000rounds/mins compares those 4500rounds/mins rated at number 5?
Semoga teknologi militer Rusia semakin canggih kedepannya dan menyalakan teknologi militer Amerika serikat dan sekutunya semoga Rusia menjadi negara Adi daya mengatikan Amerika serikat dan sekutunya
Not at all biased huh. The Phalanx is clearly inferior to the Goalkeeper, and both are inferior to the Kasthan, yet surprise surprise the Phalanx somehow made it to 2nd place. What a sham....
@@georgemartin4811 There are many reasons why it's superior, the missiles are just one of those reasons. Something all the military professionals agree on.
American ships have fuel air missiles that within 12 miles can be used in defense applications, usually no hands are out most of the time the deck is off limits. Using guns is a thing of the past.
Hi there. As it was mentioned in the video, any defense system has its imperfections and it’s always better to have a backup for those times, if any threat sneaks through those primary defense systems... This CIWS are the last line of defense. If they were so useless, the navies wouldn’t bother to install it... don’t know of any combat ship without a CIWS. Best regards...
Phalanx was put next to a goalkeeper back in the 90s and failed miserable as goalkeeper not only targeted its own targets but also that of the phalanx before the phalanx even could see it . And goalkeeper made some american pilots turn their underwear brown and yellow as towed targets where eliminated and it started to chew up the tow cable towards the towing aircraft .
Agree. Saw another video on its live firing on some drones. NOT impressed. A long trail of tracers out and still missed the target. Looked like it was lagging the target.
Olá amigo! Não podemos ignorar o grande avanço technologico militar... tudo o que possuem é desenvolvido por eles ou em conjunto com a Rússia... eu não acredito que seja bluff... eles têm tudo para ser a potência que são. Saudações camarada
Hi there! According to some sources this particular Chinese ciws system breakdown very often. Every other channel, military websites etc... rates this system not so good... but yes it’s fast and powerful... and it is quite a recent addition to the Chinese weaponry therefore maybe will change after it proves itself.... tbh with you, the difference between this systems is very slim, so it’s always a very unfair list to make.... the Chinese say that their systems are the best, the us says the same, Europeans the same and the Russians bla bla bla bla... so I can’t make everybody happy... it’s a win win or lose lose situation, there’s no middle term.... best regards and thank you for your participation... peace
@@Diversusmilitary You put mass installments of phanlax 2 as key factor for it to be #2, but ingore the mass installments of 1130 on 054A, 052D, 055, 075 and the carriers. If 1130 really breaks down that often as you made up, why wouldn't they just buy the Russian ciws? You are nothing but another biased westner bullshitting about Chinese quality. Oh, I guess the americans don't treat you like white anymore.
@@Diversusmilitary Tbf it all depended on the quality of the 'ceremonial' cup of saké beforehand..too good and a guaranteed rtb, too cheap and pilots opted for a ceremonial blaze of glory instead. Knowing the Chinese, this daisy wheel replaces the twenty one gun salute..
You mean the pantsir controlled by Syrians? yep, Pantsirs were made for Russians, and all controls are in Russian. While the Russians use it for S400 close fight support, the Syrians use it as standalone air defense. BIG MISTAKE.
Wow! Dude that russian's (Soviet) Kashtan looks like it is from a fantastic movie as Matrix or The Terminator!..
Yes the Russians don't mess about when they design their weapons systems...there is no soft kill version. The Russians go for the Terminator approach.....:)
I like the name, goalkeeper. Because it is actually the last line of defense
For sheer gun power, the Chinese 11-barrelled type 1130 CIWS, is a beast, and a Chinese TV report stated that it could stop incoming anti-ship missiles up to a speed of Mach 4 with a 96% success rate.
I wouldn't trust 'Chinese TV' anything
@@FloppyCat1990 it's true it got tested and proven
Then why did they not show it...
The only ones we shoot anything are the American and the Netherland guns while the Russian ones and Chinese one only showed it firing
@@odd_bobble9106 Believe it or not. Checked the latest sea-trial video of the 003 carrier, the model equipped in the carrier are the latest modified version of 1130, came with AESA radar (rectangular antenna iso the old one use disc type antenna), capable of tracking multiple targets and prioritize them according to the threat levels. Its the first of its kind using mini AESA radar on CIWS.
This is primarily a gun or gun-missile CIWS list. There are pure missile CIWS like RAM, Sea-Ram, Barak or Sea Wolf. Sea Wolf is amazing, considering its age.
Sea Wolf has been constantly and consistently been upgraded.
1. Type 1130 (China)
2: Pantsir (Russia)
3: Type 730 (China)
4. Goalkeeper (Netherlands)
5: Kashtan (Russia)
ps. Phalanx shouldn't even be in contention. It uses 20mm which has inferior range to any 30mm ammunition while having lower rate of fire.
Great video, great info. Thanks
Thank you. Best regards
Well, 730 is 7 barrels 30mm CIWS which named H/PJ-12, the specs you put are actually 1130 CIWS, H/PJ-11, which means 11 barrels 30mm CIWS, around 11000/min. Don't know too many details about this since it been used in recent Type 052D, 055, and 001, 002 carriers. CCTV actually has some firing footages using that 1130, the footage in this video was blur but I would say it is probably 730 CIWS not 1130 CIWS.
Everyone:we have CIWS
Russia:That's sweet
Kashtan background noises
IMPRESSIONANTES!
Obrigado pelo seu comentário positivo. Fico contente que meu vídeo o agradou. Saudações
Where is AK 630 DUET
It’s only 5 ciws systems. Regards
The Phalanx is actually supposed to be a bit weaker than the other CIWS in this list probably due to it using only 20mm shells, rather than the others 30mm shells. Plus Phalanx is popular mainly to the fact it is a cheap option, as it can just literally be bolted onto a deck of a warship, whereas systems like Goalkeeper retrofitted to ships need extensive work inside the ship so it can be fitted.........just ask the Royal Navy.
I've noticed UK uses phalanx.
@@pipmill7076 ....umm, that's what my comment said...:)
Phalanx might use a 20mm gun but the main reason its still relevant against these systems and better than weapons like the ak-630 which should be better on paper is its software and tracking abilities within the actual module- which is why sea-ram reuses that module, phalanx is probably a lot more expensive than ak-630, Dardo, etc and equivalent to the weapons on this list. Goalkeeper was probably better than Phalanx in the 80's and 90's, not sure now. Its been phased out in a lot of navies and lost pace with phalanx in some of the navies its continued in service unmodernised in. Phalanx is cheaper to update and support thanks to the support of the larger US arms industry but the goalkeepers that have been modernised in dutch service are probably better pieces of kit
@@lukeallison3713 First of all, AK-630 is not on this list so not really a system to compare with, and the fact that more use it or that it’s cheap or easy to maintain do not say anything about quality.
Would like to know what in Phalanx that does it better then Type 1130 as an example, or Goalkeeper.
@@MrCastodian I just said it is in fact updated more frequently than (some of) the 30mm weapons and therefore the 20mm shell disadvantrage is less significant- while goalkeeper, despite its firepower will not have been updated with new blocks. However the type 1130 volume of fire is unprecedented apart from the similarly large kashtan- and if its as accurate as claimed, its clearly miles ahead of phalanx. Actually think western ciws should go in the direction of 35 and 40mm weapons with AHEAD or similar technology while trying to increase fire rate and 57 and 76mm weapons with guided rounds like dart and mad-fires rather than provide an answer to the 1130, its the pinacle of its type of ciws
А где ,,Дуэт".10000 выстрелов в мин.?
these weapons systems reminds me the Destroid Mechs from Robotech
Oerlikon millenium?(2)
Very effective for missile attack defence
Rheinmetall
Top
Awesome vídeo
Thank you so much for your positive comment. I am pleased that you enjoyed it. Best regards primo.😜
I agree with this list
Thank you. Regards
Oerlikon millenium ??
If you are firing these it's literally your last chances.
i cant find any info on the Type 1130, how do you find this?
H/PJ-11 CIWS
Try the Chinese Defence forums!
Before watching the video:
Ok, top-5 weapons let me guess... It will include (i) some European (swiss or french) system that looks cool but barely used due to high costs, (ii) modern Russian system that is placed on place 3-5 without even looking at its characteristics, (iii) some 80-s development US system that is put on the №1 spot for propoganda reasons.
After watching the video:
Wow, I stand corrected! Thanks for the honest video!
Hi there... Thank you for your positive comment. This list is based on my personal opinion, but obviously not everyone agrees with me.best regards
You talk about 730 but the info you released is type 1130....
730 is previous generation product and is a copy of ak630 form Russia .The 1130 is the new generation and should in the top of this list（The only Gatling ciws system with a rate of fire exceeding 10,000 rounds per minute）
Well spotted. I meant to talk about the 1130, forget the 730. Even the footage and the 3D image are the 1130. It was a typing mistake. Apologies and I hope it hasn’t ruined the video for you. Regards
@@Diversusmilitary You did a good job, the information of 1130 is hard to find in the English-speaking world.
👌👍
I didn’t forget you. Canada navy. Regards
Kashtan - AK630
АК-630М-2 «Дуэт»
Wow!~
Does anyone know anything about the Leonardo lionfish CIWS? My country( canada is apparently getting new river class destroyers, based of the type 23 frigate. But rather that the phalanx CIWS that is currently on our frigates. The new ones will have 2 lionfish CIWS. I am just wondering if that is a good or bad choice. Thanks all.
Hi there! I will try to make a video including Leonardo lionfish.🙏
@@Diversusmilitary Sounds good. Thanks
Bless you. I’m. Like
Great Infos!!
Thank you very much. ✌️I have watch a few of your videos, and you earned another subscriber. Cool channel you got there. Good use of synthetic voice. You use Mathew like I do… great choice.👍 good luck with your channel.
I have referred you to a few more channels 😜
2:14 THATS THE GOALKEEPER ALSO FROM KSP :O
KSP? Its from signaal and GE now from Thales group in the Netherlands
Goalkeeper is the only one I've seen on video shooting down a sea skimming ASM head on .
Surprised that the Oerlikon 35mm wasn't included but the Type 730 and Phalanx.
Type 730 is nothing more but a Chinese copy of the 630 ciws.
Do your research, 730 is not 630.
@@Lcr34 its the same. Just 7 barrels. And maybe some Chinese copy of Russian subsystems.
@@theoakatsuki I wouldn't be half mad if you said they copied goalkeeper
Intro music pls😁
Well ! from my point of view i think that the best all round CIWS is Oerlikon Millenium 35mm/1000 rpm Swiss/German made revolver cannon.
This system its better than the other gatlingunn CIWS, because it is less complicated, more reliable, maybe less expensive, it have excellent radar and sensors...
I think that the only down side would be a ammunition capacity, which would be beetter to increase.
In other hand, all gatllingunn systems are good for movies, power demostration, powerfull looking from the outside view, but in real situation thay are not as thay look like.
Каштан - самый крутой!
Панцирь-МЕ тоже хорош
And then the hog flew over and went brrrrrr on the ships before they even saw the hog...
Nah cuz the hog can't take ships on he would be killed on sight
@@balkan25 hog will be shredded into bits of pieces
While i love this "flying tank" hog and it does wonders in close air support to ground troops, i'd never use them to attack a modern ship at close range. It's both slow and not stealthy, it would be instantly picked up by the radar and sent some SAMs at before even getting remotely close to the CIWS range.
Only way would be to have enough hogs firing AGMs from different angles around the ship at the same time to both overwhelm the SAM capacity by the hogs number, and overwhelm the CIWS capacity by the incoming AGMs number. (Yeah, Brrrrrute Forrrrce and more Dakka! XD)
Don't know the rate of fire for typical ship's SAM, % success of fighters couter-measures against incoming SAM, nor how many AGMs are needed to overwhelm a CIWS, but if supposedly that could even be feasible, this expensive "tactic" would incurr heavy losses on the hogs to score a successful hit on a modern ship, looks like they're just obviously not designed for this role.
But as most CIWS have about twice the range than the hog's cannon it would be both suicidal and useless to try a close-range strike.
Ak 630 ciws
Russian "duet"??
Pantsier is the best system by far with sintetic aperture phased array Radar system
Suny12 Ask the Israelis how good the Pantsir is.
@@abuxxx3607 I don't think we are talking about the same thing.
Hi, what do you think of Turkey's Aselsan Gokdeniz CIWS?
Nothing this system has been fitted on all Turkish Naval combat ships and also has been exported to navies of Indonesia, Malaysia and Pakistan.
Thank you 🌹
Hi there! I will find out more about it... thank you , best regards
Kashtan is the best CIWS.
Just a question is AK 630 good?
Hi there! The AK-630 is a Soviet and Russian fully automatic naval close-in weapon system based on a six-barreled 30 mm rotary cannon. It’s very good but this list is only top 5. If it was top 10 probably I would place it in 8th place... regards
It's not so efficient to sea skimming missile lik NSM.....it's going subsonic less than 5 m above sea level. Realy hard to detect.....especialy when you hav wave condition! And this missile also have counter measure capabilitys against gatling guns like high rate of manouvring.
In reality the kashtan is number 2 and unstoppable.
Hyper missile make all those obsolete.
Goalkeeper is stroonger than Pphalanx, since 1972 it hardly needed to be upgraded or even unlike the Phalanx it doe snot need multiple versions, it is a multi-purposed system.
El kashtan en mejor y mas eficas que phalanx, sabes.
Italian DARDO are the best, highest range, and the easily to adapt in any ship...
Dardo shoot nail, therefore it is carpenter
Phalanx on two is debatable given effective range of the 20 gatling gun... but I am missing the rolling airframe missile.
I agree with about phanlax on 2, it took a lot of researching and in the end the number of navy’s using it made me decide this way. About the not including rolling airframe, I decided to do this video with gun-based CIWS only... best regards
@@Diversusmilitary How does the number of Navy's using it have anything to do with the ranking? The only thing that says something about is how a certain nation keeps ramming it's military equipment through other countries' throats, and not how effective they are.
Chinas type 730 looks like dutch goal keeper😁
Well yeah, China obviously copied it
Like how they copied almost everything
@@woodonfire7406 Copied it? 11000 rm copied from Aliens? WAKE UP IDIOT. Some of their military weapons are dope AF.
@@woodonfire7406 China has the largest number of patents in the world in 2019，and you just adiot
@@user-xq2ck6jt6w china has the largest number of patents as well as the largest IP theft
No way 20mm phalanx is at 2. It lacks the range the 30mm counterpart has, and you might wanna add SeaRam and Rheinmetall/oerlikon millennium 35mm.
High there... range is not all but respect your opinion. Searam is not Gun based. Please you are welcome to share your list with us... best regards
@@Diversusmilitary Range and kinetic energy advantages.
To be honest with you, CIWS is not my strongest military subject... after reading many articles, I made this list... if I had included searam on this list probably it would be on top together with phalanx but still the new Russian CIWS in first... please keep your knowledgeable thoughts coming, that’s the way my channel can grow... thank you for your participation. Best regards
You have to keep in mind it's about more than just the gun doing brrrrrrt it's about the whole system. The phalanx might lack in range but it can be bolted down on virtually any ship and is a mostly self-contained unit. As opposed to the goalkeeper which is turret-mounted and therefor partially below decks. Making it less useful/practical for some navy's. Which doesn't hurt the guns performance but it does limit its use. Same for the Chinese one which was only sutable for larger ships.
@woosh me if you are gay HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHA
intro/outro music?
I wish only if you could rate these system by numbers, not how famous they are.
How chinese 11,000rounds/mins compares those 4500rounds/mins rated at number 5?
What about efficiency, reliability, proven technology etc... hi there. Best regards
@@Diversusmilitary russian kasthan have 12000 round in minute
so, this vedio is a joke
Modern Warship games 😊
Very loud music
Woow Russian one the best
Not really. The performance of Russian weapons and equipment typically fall far short of their boastful claims.
👍😎🍺🍕🚀✈🚢
😃🤩👍🏻
THe GandonTRON 1000 lmaoo wtf jesus some crazy shit!
Were is the 35mm ciws of Reich metal with a he with detonation of proximity
Hi there. This video it’s only the top 5... if it was top10 I certainly would included that system.... thank you
I also agree it's top 5
Rhinemetall not reich metal btw LMAO
No.5 is RIM 116 instead of chinese goalkeeper replica
Pf otomelara 76 Is the best
Oerlikon skyshield
Bayraktar tb 2 onla tanisana tanışana kadar hepsi çok korkunçtur sonrası kolay hedef
Kashtan should be number 1
Semoga teknologi militer Rusia semakin canggih kedepannya dan menyalakan teknologi militer Amerika serikat dan sekutunya semoga Rusia menjadi negara Adi daya mengatikan Amerika serikat dan sekutunya
Turkey had her 35mm "Gökdeniz" CIWS shipboard tests completed.
👍😎🍺🍩🚢🚀🚀
Not at all biased huh. The Phalanx is clearly inferior to the Goalkeeper, and both are inferior to the Kasthan, yet surprise surprise the Phalanx somehow made it to 2nd place. What a sham....
Just because it has missiles doesn't make it better bud
@@georgemartin4811 There are many reasons why it's superior, the missiles are just one of those reasons. Something all the military professionals agree on.
@@pieterveenders9793 I'm not going to have a debate in a youtube comment section, but overall no, it is not superior
@@georgemartin4811 it is superior
AK 630M2 ??????
Where is my favorite AK-630M2 ?
1:33 99% accuracy against hyper-sonic threads??? its a joke?
That’s what they say and according to the Chinese military the accuracy is right. Thank you for your participation. Best regards
90%*
@tfs2O3 "notching 90%" according to the youtube subtitles - again what that mean? )
@tfs2O3 thank you for answer!
Mexico debería tener una de esas harmas para su ejército y Marina ya que yo le apuesto ala gran. Madre Rusia. Ven diciones a todos
La madre Rusia no existe y México si cuenta con uno de estos en la POLA
For me CIWS Phalanx is on my Top1
@@yogipaisalnugraha4997 IDC if Khastan has the Powerful CIWS i still Love my Phalanx thats still my Top1
@@firefighterfrcg5732 you can say that. Phalanx is skinny sexy while khastan were super thicc 😂😂😂
American ships have fuel air missiles that within 12 miles can be used in defense applications, usually no hands are out most of the time the deck is off limits.
Using guns is a thing of the past.
Hi there. As it was mentioned in the video, any defense system has its imperfections and it’s always better to have a backup for those times, if any threat sneaks through those primary defense systems... This CIWS are the last line of defense. If they were so useless, the navies wouldn’t bother to install it... don’t know of any combat ship without a CIWS. Best regards...
I was a Fire Control man in the US Navy, you are clueless Rikki.
>American ships don't need guns
>Has phalanx
Pick one
Fuel air is old tech btw
Hepsi çok kolay hedef
Kinda weard the nr 4 from Thales, After some trainings with Nato allies the goalkeeper never missed a target while other nato systems failed. mmmm
CIWS is important to the ship. Last defense system.
What if Falcons and Golgipper combine?
Plot twist: these weapons get destroyed first when in fight :)
Destroyed with what?
@@maxblack4596 his mother sits on them.
Most of weapons made are for defence so there will be no more war they will just keep away to each other hehe
Phalanx was put next to a goalkeeper back in the 90s and failed miserable as goalkeeper not only targeted its own targets but also that of the phalanx before the phalanx even could see it . And goalkeeper made some american pilots turn their underwear brown and yellow as towed targets where eliminated and it started to chew up the tow cable towards the towing aircraft .
Where's NBS Mantis?
Audrey Isaac hi there... this is only top 5.... i can’t include every system. Please share with us what would be your preferred list.... best regards
@@Diversusmilitary me too i don't have any infornation about this because it is newly made by the german military
กันโดรนกับจรวด
Cwis’s are basically a shotgun that shoots at 4000+ rpm
Where is ASELSAN Gökdeniz?
7th place. Best regards
Despite that Moskva got sunk.How?
Phalanx can't hit moving boat, how came to be in 2nd spot..bias analysis
That is quite a statement. Personally I think a bit exaggerated. But I respect everyone’s opinion... best regards
Agree. Saw another video on its live firing on some drones. NOT impressed. A long trail of tracers out and still missed the target. Looked like it was lagging the target.
Iran weapons no 1 in this world is named kamand this best all of them
Bom video não sei e se confio no que os chineses dizem
Olá amigo! Não podemos ignorar o grande avanço technologico militar... tudo o que possuem é desenvolvido por eles ou em conjunto com a Rússia... eu não acredito que seja bluff... eles têm tudo para ser a potência que são. Saudações camarada
@@Diversusmilitary pois é verdade, continue o bom trabalho
Where is oerlikon?
In 6th place . Best regards
all system that are from democracy countries should be on the number 1 spot. god say so
.
This video was made before Ukraine war. Best regards
А где Российский дуэт , он круче всех.
Russian Panzir - I`m the best air defence system! US F 35 - I dont thinc sou!
😂
Bayrakhtar drones.
There's a new gun in town its called a laser in both ship born and aircraft.
Totally useless against asbestos coated missile.
BRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRTTTTT
🤣👍
The Chinese one 1100 rm is crazy fast are you sure ??
Hi there! According to some sources this particular Chinese ciws system breakdown very often. Every other channel, military websites etc... rates this system not so good... but yes it’s fast and powerful... and it is quite a recent addition to the Chinese weaponry therefore maybe will change after it proves itself.... tbh with you, the difference between this systems is very slim, so it’s always a very unfair list to make.... the Chinese say that their systems are the best, the us says the same, Europeans the same and the Russians bla bla bla bla... so I can’t make everybody happy... it’s a win win or lose lose situation, there’s no middle term.... best regards and thank you for your participation... peace
@@Diversusmilitary You can't keep everyone happy, keep up the good work ...uk
Gar Whittaker I am glad that you enjoy my work... thank you for your understanding. Thank you for being a subscriber to my channel. Best regards.
🇬🇧🇬🇧🇬🇧
@@Diversusmilitary You put mass installments of phanlax 2 as key factor for it to be #2, but ingore the mass installments of 1130 on 054A, 052D, 055, 075 and the carriers. If 1130 really breaks down that often as you made up, why wouldn't they just buy the Russian ciws? You are nothing but another biased westner bullshitting about Chinese quality. Oh, I guess the americans don't treat you like white anymore.
Guess Kamikaze won't work anymore..
Lol
@@Diversusmilitary Tbf it all depended on the quality of the 'ceremonial' cup of saké beforehand..too good and a guaranteed rtb, too cheap and pilots opted for a ceremonial blaze of glory instead. Knowing the Chinese, this daisy wheel replaces the twenty one gun salute..
So many talks
Did the pantsir got destroyed by israel drone?
You mean the pantsir controlled by Syrians? yep, Pantsirs were made for Russians, and all controls are in Russian. While the Russians use it for S400 close fight support, the Syrians use it as standalone air defense. BIG MISTAKE.
Kok tuan rumah perang dunia 3 semoga tidak terjadi perang Indonesia biar aman