Fermilab is NOT shut down. We shutdown one of our accelerators, the Tevatron, last fall but we are moving forward into the Intensity Frontier of particle physics. Come visit and see. We're close by!
I've been there twice, once in 1980 and again in 82...I think. I didn't really understand it at the time, but thanks to videos like this I have a much stronger grasp. I'm a fan, keep up the great vids.
I believe the Standard model is incomplete and Pauli Exclusionary Principle can be violated because Superposition and Spooky Action at a Distance is real and it also must Violate E=mc2 and faster than light information communication, Fermi Dirac Distribution Fermi energies, Ultimately implies that the Wave function, Heininberg Uncertainty, Planck's Constant, And the Cosmological constant is incorrect
After a good deal of trying to understand the Standard Model of quantum physics, this video has explained to me the final bits I needed to get my puzzle solved... This is probably the best (sort of dumbed-down) explanation of the Standard Model I've seen!
Thanks, Fermilab! I've been keeping up since I was a student reading Scientific American. Went there with my husband and his sister, they still talk about it after five years.
Hey! Im 15, and i filled ~50 pages with the information from theese videos! Its interesting! You can learn theese! It's such a wonderful feeling to get a little bit closer to understand, what happens around us, and why does it happen. I especialy like relativity, but i have to rewatch several parts of the videos. But it works! Im learning!
I agree. I struggled with the basics of chemistry for a long time and this has actually solved most of my doubts about charge mass and behavior of different substances.
Just gone back to studying physics and chemistry A-levels, after half a lifetime of art and philosophy:) Am loving it. It's a good change to have right or wrong answers, after so much subjectivity;) This guy has quickly become my 'go to' for great, personable explanations:) thankyou x
Thanks Dr. Don.You have no idea how disarming your presentation is. You seem like one of the best spokepersons to explain why we need to keep funding this research. You've convinced me and (btw) I've always hated Theoretical Physics for it's lack of focus, inattention, and utter disregard to simply "building a better mouse trap".
Such a useful video, I’m currently studying particle physics in high school and I was struggling to get my head around the whole idea. Thank you so much!
I never really knew the role of bosons, now I know they're the forces, every video or documentary I watch teaches me something knew or makes me think about something differently than I've done before, thank you fermilab
5:05 Yeah I was confused about the weak force. Like always physicists brush this off by saying "the weak force is responsible for some type of radioactivity". But now I got it after the new video of fermilab about the weak force and going in details about it.
Awesome job with the explanation. This is sci comm at its best. Doesn't dumb down anything, gives an honest look at the current situation and uses good analogies to make it easier to the lay viewer.
ua-cam.com/video/CGxIDbqRsGY/v-deo.html The theory of everything | The standard model of particle physics Watch till the end ang share if found informative
Thank you for a wonderfully explanatory video. I recall hearing you on the old Milt Rosenberg radio show. How great those programs were. I'm an old Liberal Arts guy who is rediscovering science. As I read and watch each day, I am continually surprised and astonished at the macro and the micro. With Einstein and Quantum Physics, who needs Science Fiction?
Good lord...I did Chem, Bio and Math for A levels and always regretted not doing Physics. Never understood the standard model and the reason why in this age of information is any video I watch starts off with a ten minute history lesson, then they mention the sub atomic particles and then go into quantum mechanics and confuse themselves and me just because they want to say "quantum mechanics". This video is the first I've seen that simply explains it beautifully... Thank you so much!
THANK YOU PROFESSOR LINCOLN...!!! It was like a review for me ...since I have learned first from you and then from others too...!!! Still keep on reviewing to make sure ...and remind myself of the terminology...!!!
I really don't understand force by particle exchange. 1. How does attraction work 2. Wouldn't the particle get exhausted by emitting exchange particles, even when the receiving particle is not there, if it only emits the exchange particle when the other particle is there, then how does is come to know about it.
So here's my best explanation. I think it's more helpful to think of the 'particle' as a wave packet. Take the gluon for example. The gluon has a mass/energy nearly as large as a single atom of gold. But when a gluon is bound within a system of quarks, it creates a wave 'trough' or potential energy well. The quarks attract each other because they lie at the lowest energy point of this gluon well. For the quarks to be split apart requires sufficient energy to overcome this gluon potential energy well. And as I mentioned, that energy is huge - comparable to the mass / energy of single gold atom.
It's not force boson fermions or Particle exchange , but Rather all Force particle exsist as a Unifiable Field and it's Fields Vibration or spin is what's we called Force and, It's Orientation is what we call Quarks ,Electron ,proton Photon or basic particle matter building blocks
That's actually one of the best videos about this subject, I don't have a deep knowledge on physics although I have lot o curiosity and interest on it, even with my little knowledge I could understand the main idea behind the concepts and want to learn even more about it!
I believe the Standard model is incomplete and Pauli Exclusionary Principle can be violated because Superposition and Spooky Action at a Distance is real and it also must Violate E=mc2 and faster than light information communication, Fermi Dirac Distribution Fermi energies, Ultimately implies that the Wave function, Heininberg Uncertainty, Planck's Constant, And the Cosmological constant is incorrect
Break down isnt really the right way of putting it. The weak force can essentially change the flavour (type) of particle, and if it changes from a high energy particle to a lower energy particle then other particles will be created using the left over energy
ua-cam.com/video/CGxIDbqRsGY/v-deo.html The theory of everything | The standard model of particle physics Watch till the end ang share if found informative
Excellent presentation! I am reassured that there still some "secrets" to be discovered and questions to be answered (for my grand-children that is). Thank you, Ciao, L
ua-cam.com/video/CGxIDbqRsGY/v-deo.html The theory of everything | The standard model of particle physics Watch till the end ang share if found informative
I can't wait until I'm far enough into my education to learn and understand the math and experimentation behind subatomic particle physics :D I'M SO EXCITED (and impatient) ...just thought I'd mention that because this video reminded me to be curious and ask questions :)
Thanks for the video - it helped answer some of my queries on the atomic make up....which has puzzled me during the O.U. course I am doing. Its a good job gravity force is so small - otherwise I would be much heavier - its bad enough now trying to loose weight.
I have a few questions 😁 Does gravity affect all sizes of particles? Even Higgs Boson? Am I the only person who believes that there is no end to how “small” or “elemental” something can be?
If gravity is a space time bending then at the lowest, smallest measurements, then surely you would understand the direction of the force would be negligible against a space time curve and hence it wouldn't apply. Its like resistance of something massive with huge momentum ignoring gravity. Imagine a bending ruler, then focus in on the centre. The closer you get to it the straighter the edges look. Eventually everything travels in a straight line, always.
joppadoni this is a cool thought but it's based on the premise of a center existing in the first place. space time does not have a center , so the idea of a direction of the force of gravity doesn't exactly exist.
indeed, the deeper you go in to a mass the flatter space time becomes, hence no central point, thats why gravity reduces the further you dig a deep, deep, deep hole in to, say the earth. but i dont think that matters, the distances become so tiny. only in black holes would that curvature become a feature, or rather an effect. i think it is here that the answers will be found to link the two.
Good stuff !! You explain complicated subjects in a simple way. I "wish" you would do a video on Electromagnetism. I understand the words, "a photon" has two fields, electric field and magnetic field; but I think you could make the concept more intuitive.
I have an important question that's been bugging me. When he explains how bosons serve has particles that bounce between two other particles, the image of the guys playing catch on the shore shows that it pushes them further apart. But it's supposed to be what keeps particles together? I'm trying to wrap my head around how that works
Jovarans Guplar i believe it’s way way more complicated than that, it’s just an overly simplified example, I urge you not to overthink overly simplified examples as it won’t really help
so the higgs boson gives particles mass, but isn't that what gravity does? could higgs and gravitons be the same thing? I've always seen gravity demonstrated as a bowling ball on a mattress causing marbles to fall into its depression, so is the mattress in that example representing the higgs field?
1:18 The trouble with terms like “element” and “atom” is that, almost as soon as we give them to something, we discover that that thing is not so “elementary” or “atomic” after all, and can be broken down into smaller pieces ...
Sir I have a question.i think gravity is weakest force because it may be using other particles to emit gravity or gravitational waves just like conductor or inductor concept is it possible?
I imagine a world where we slowly learn to manipulate and control smaller realms of matter. From chemistry and nano-tech today which harnesses and arranges atoms, to perhaps one day being able to control and manipulate these quarks and other particles, to whatever is inside/hidden under them when we learn to manipulate them. I hope the trail never ends... or stops getting smaller.
Edit Don Lincoln (born 1964) is an American physicist, author, host of the UA-cam channel Fermilab, and science communicator. He conducts research in particle physics at Fermi National Accelerator Laboratory and is an adjunct professor of physics at the University of Notre Dame.[1] He received a Ph.D. in experimental particle physics from Rice University in 1994. In 1995, he was a codiscoverer of the top quark.[2] He has coauthored hundreds of research papers and, more recently, was a member of the team that discovered the Higgs boson in 2012.[3.....from wikipedia......(sir,, take my salute)
Fermilab scientists know what gravity is. It is a partial entanglement phenomenon. It so rare and weak because it is rare entanglements and partial entanglemets to break, well it happens but at very lower rates. partial entanglements are easily to DEGRADE than pure entanglements among only two particles. A partial entanglement of many particles has a lower degrading threshold level, and even the quantum noise level of the void affects it. If we heat something it becomes heavier because we allow partial entanglements degrade at faster rates, but not way faster except in neutron stars, compressed plasma black hole accretion disk etc. Each new partial entanglement degrades at a more stable quantum state, but not all energy is transformed into motion, some is spread out as heat. Of course we have statistically some few pure entanglements, but even them may degrade, but in that case not with an interaction with a field as partially entangled particels or with random low quantum noise of the void, but with moving partially entangled particles or purely entangle particles that crush on the purely entangled one. I want to that Fermilab for explaining what gravity really is!!! these guys have relly TOP iq !!! ok, the Fermigravity or Entanglogravity is one option, we also have chromogravity [MIT about chomatic information shared partially to other particles and not only inside one] but some scientists claim that both theories are the same mathematically entanglogravity is way simpler though [just a different flavour as many claim]
Question: Einstein, with general relativity, replaced "action at a distance" with space curvature defined by massive objects like the sun. What about charge (electric force) or the nuclear force? Is there an equivalent space curvature model for these? Or do we handle these fundamentally different?
Dear Don Lincoln, could you, please, elaborate on how particle exchange can explain the action of forces? For example, it is easy to see the repulsion as it was demonstrated in this video, but how about the attractive forces, how do we explain with particle exchange? Would the boat have to through a sack away from person on the shore? How does particle conservation apply to this context?
I have a question, since all things are made of proton neutron electron, and now we know it are based on smaller building blocks explained by the standard model, where do all this particles come from? Can we build these particles, thus we can somewhat create something out of nothing?
Actually he didnt really make an exhaustive description of the model. On a quick note, each particle has an anti-particle. So we have antiquarks, antielectron (positron) etc etc. Also virtual particles exist as binary + and - particles.
Wow always great to revisit, wow is it that long. Thanks Dr Don and the Fermilab-YT-Team, every video is an honour to see, educational and entertaining. Will a Lepto-Quark be found ever? :-) NEAL
Should the quarks, leptons, boson and forces be considered as making up all there is? As in, should they be considered as exhaustively being the building blocks of all reality?
The example at 6:28 lets me to understand repulsive forces but it doesn't explain attractive forces. Electromagnetism is repulsive for a pair of charges where both are positive or where both are negative, but is an atractive force for a pair os charges where one is positive and the other is negative. Where can I find an example to understand atractive forces?
Interference patterns can create the appearance of movement such that constructive or destructive interference shift the location of the particle by destructive (lower energy) or interfering and cancelling the trailing end of the waves that make up the particle, while simultaneously constructively interfering to create the new front that makes up the particle thus attractive. or by the conjugate of that a repulsive. It's always an interference pattern, waves interacting with waves, whether attractive or repulsive depends upon how the waves combine to create the destructive interference or constructive interference, in relation to the non force particles and forces in play. Destructive on the first wave front and Constructive immediately after the falling back edge is repulsive; Constructive ahead of the leading wave front, and destructive on the falling back edge is attractive. We only get the real interesting stuff when dealing with higher energy state forces closer to nuclei like in quarks. That's a whole other ball of wax but basically forces have local privileges based on proximity where they are stronger than other forces and what constitutes a higher or lower energy state.. So, the first paragraph was for one dimension, for another, dealing with conjugate pairs of vectors... we find. Positive or negative is also a phase force vector function, with (1 particle being + & the other -) the forces being destructive phase amplitude cancelling conjugates creating an energy well (and thus particles move toward each other, toward the lower energy state), whereas + & + or - & - are phase constructive amplitude additive energy states (and thus particles move away from each other, or toward anywhere but the higher energy states between them. So basically, opposites are real and complex sum of squares conjugates and energy cancelling states, whereas same sign are same space 'real' and 'real' sum of squares complementary energy additive states and particles always seek lowest local energy states anywhere but where the energy is doubled. Plus the first paragraph, with both, a very complex constructive and destructive interference package. Add enough particles, and computers even give up the ghost. :-)
Concise. Is the planetary model thingy an appropriate time to mention Rutherford and Bohrs' conceptions (prior knowledge)? At least until 1987?, undergraduate chemistry, physics courses did not mention the SM; and it, of course, made it into no hs texts. Why not?
"What exactly is fire and what makes it glow?" *GREAT QUESTION TIMMY, LET'S LOOK AT THE STANDARD MODEL.*
I laughed hard at this!
😂😂😂😂😂
RAZENOID!?!?!?!?!
What is TV and what makes it glow?
Timmy: Can we eat that?
Fermilab is NOT shut down. We shutdown one of our accelerators, the Tevatron, last fall but we are moving forward into the Intensity Frontier of particle physics. Come visit and see. We're close by!
Very Informative. Thanks for sharing. Best wishes, Lord-Jesus-Christ com
I've been there twice, once in 1980 and again in 82...I think. I didn't really understand it at the time, but thanks to videos like this I have a much stronger grasp. I'm a fan, keep up the great vids.
must like this no matter what happen :D
how close you are now?
I LOVE FERMILAB!!!!
Thanks for existing, Fermilab
me: ok today imma go to sleep early
my brain at 3 AM: wanna learn about subatomic particle physics and the nature of the universe itself?
Nice
genius
I believe the Standard model is incomplete and Pauli Exclusionary Principle can be violated because Superposition and Spooky Action at a Distance is real and it also must Violate E=mc2 and faster than light information communication, Fermi Dirac Distribution Fermi energies, Ultimately implies that the Wave function, Heininberg Uncertainty, Planck's Constant, And the Cosmological constant is incorrect
My brain at 3am: let's check the fridge!
Big same
After a good deal of trying to understand the Standard Model of quantum physics, this video has explained to me the final bits I needed to get my puzzle solved... This is probably the best (sort of dumbed-down) explanation of the Standard Model I've seen!
Thanks, Fermilab! I've been keeping up since I was a student reading Scientific American. Went there with my husband and his sister, they still talk about it after five years.
This should be required watching for all children when they start high-school or even earlier if the parents can explain it properly.
agreed!
Chloecybin I would of loved being taught this as a freshman.
Hey! Im 15, and i filled ~50 pages with the information from theese videos! Its interesting! You can learn theese! It's such a wonderful feeling to get a little bit closer to understand, what happens around us, and why does it happen. I especialy like relativity, but i have to rewatch several parts of the videos. But it works! Im learning!
I agree. I struggled with the basics of chemistry for a long time and this has actually solved most of my doubts about charge mass and behavior of different substances.
@@loganreidy7055 I doubt you would understand it. You write "would of", instead of would have. No offence, pal, but that's the act of a moron.
Standard Model very well explained in 8 minutes.. This must be some kind of World Record. Thank you!
Just gone back to studying physics and chemistry A-levels, after half a lifetime of art and philosophy:) Am loving it. It's a good change to have right or wrong answers, after so much subjectivity;) This guy has quickly become my 'go to' for great, personable explanations:) thankyou x
Thanks Dr. Don.You have no idea how disarming your presentation is. You seem like one of the best spokepersons to explain why we need to keep funding this research. You've convinced me and (btw) I've always hated Theoretical Physics for it's lack of focus, inattention, and utter disregard to simply "building a better mouse trap".
I really like Don Lincoln's presentations. They informative and very coherently constructed. Keep up the good work fermilab, I'm a big fan :)
This is one of those videos where I scroll down a couple of times to make sure I pressed the like button
Very much appreciated . Not too dumber down not too difficulty for anyone willing to make an effort. Thank you
Such a useful video, I’m currently studying particle physics in high school and I was struggling to get my head around the whole idea. Thank you so much!
I never really knew the role of bosons, now I know they're the forces, every video or documentary I watch teaches me something knew or makes me think about something differently than I've done before, thank you fermilab
Thanks a lot for the subtitles in English, they make the google translator very easy for other languages.
Dude, you rock! There are lots of people on UA-cam who crush it, but you take it to the next level. Thanks!!
..so your children ask these questions ?
the only questions is I hear is "Who took the xbox controller again " Why didnt you charge it ?"
What about "When can I have that DLC heavy triple A game for the price of a quiet night out Dad?"
One minute in and I have subscribed. FYI I am a lawyer but my curiosity brought me here. Time well spent!
5:05
Yeah I was confused about the weak force. Like always physicists brush this off by saying "the weak force is responsible for some type of radioactivity". But now I got it after the new video of fermilab about the weak force and going in details about it.
Awesome job with the explanation. This is sci comm at its best. Doesn't dumb down anything, gives an honest look at the current situation and uses good analogies to make it easier to the lay viewer.
ua-cam.com/video/CGxIDbqRsGY/v-deo.html
The theory of everything | The standard model of particle physics
Watch till the end ang share if found informative
Excellently and clearly simplified, thank you for making this video :)
Amazing how much discovered and changed in the time of this video.
Thank you for a wonderfully explanatory video. I recall hearing you on the old Milt Rosenberg radio show. How great those programs were. I'm an old Liberal Arts guy who is rediscovering science. As I read and watch each day, I am continually surprised and astonished at the macro and the micro. With Einstein and Quantum Physics, who needs Science Fiction?
Good lord...I did Chem, Bio and Math for A levels and always regretted not doing Physics. Never understood the standard model and the reason why in this age of information is any video I watch starts off with a ten minute history lesson, then they mention the sub atomic particles and then go into quantum mechanics and confuse themselves and me just because they want to say "quantum mechanics". This video is the first I've seen that simply explains it beautifully... Thank you so much!
This was explained so clearly! Happy to say that I now finally understand the standard model.
THANK YOU PROFESSOR LINCOLN...!!!
It was like a review for me ...since I have learned first from you and then from others too...!!!
Still keep on reviewing to make sure ...and remind myself of the terminology...!!!
This channel is a gem
Your videos help me start on topics I dont know where to start with.
the best video found that tackles of fundamental particles. Looking forward for more videos
How did you get fire in your hand like that without getting burned?
Sho says it was fire? Or that it was hot?
You didn't know? All scientists know magic
This are the types of questions that are fun to think about.
@@MeloettaMarmalade There s No Such Thing As Magic.
@@SonGojit456 whoosh
I really don't understand force by particle exchange.
1. How does attraction work
2. Wouldn't the particle get exhausted by emitting exchange particles, even when the receiving particle is not there, if it only emits the exchange particle when the other particle is there, then how does is come to know about it.
Those are called virtual particles and they are just mathematical abstraction.
Hi.....
So here's my best explanation. I think it's more helpful to think of the 'particle' as a wave packet. Take the gluon for example. The gluon has a mass/energy nearly as large as a single atom of gold. But when a gluon is bound within a system of quarks, it creates a wave 'trough' or potential energy well. The quarks attract each other because they lie at the lowest energy point of this gluon well. For the quarks to be split apart requires sufficient energy to overcome this gluon potential energy well. And as I mentioned, that energy is huge - comparable to the mass / energy of single gold atom.
It's not force boson fermions or Particle exchange , but Rather all Force particle exsist as a Unifiable Field and it's Fields Vibration or spin is what's we called Force and, It's Orientation is what we call Quarks ,Electron ,proton Photon or basic particle matter building blocks
That's actually one of the best videos about this subject, I don't have a deep knowledge on physics although I have lot o curiosity and interest on it, even with my little knowledge I could understand the main idea behind the concepts and want to learn even more about it!
I love videos like this. Filled with information and very well made. Thank you! (But I am greedy... I want more!) ;)
Excellent illustration & explanation of the standard model, thanks
Yes I finally understand the Standard Model! I subscribed 👍
I believe the Standard model is incomplete and Pauli Exclusionary Principle can be violated because Superposition and Spooky Action at a Distance is real and it also must Violate E=mc2 and faster than light information communication, Fermi Dirac Distribution Fermi energies, Ultimately implies that the Wave function, Heininberg Uncertainty, Planck's Constant, And the Cosmological constant is incorrect
if your kids ask those types of questions, you are a great dad!
thank you, i finally get the standard model thanks to your explanation.
This is the vedio I was looking since long time thankyou so much for uploading this 🥺🥺😢
Upvote for proper pronunciation of 'quark'.
Kwark
It rhymes with Mark. End of story (Finnegan's Wake).
@@Jehannum2000 There's no apostrophe in Finnegans Wake.
Why is the down quark considered fundamental when, during beta decay, it breaks down to an up quark, an electron, and a neutrino?
Break down isnt really the right way of putting it. The weak force can essentially change the flavour (type) of particle, and if it changes from a high energy particle to a lower energy particle then other particles will be created using the left over energy
Next level simplification is…thank you Sir.
ua-cam.com/video/CGxIDbqRsGY/v-deo.html
The theory of everything | The standard model of particle physics
Watch till the end ang share if found informative
Excellent presentation! I am reassured that there still some "secrets" to be discovered and questions to be answered (for my grand-children that is). Thank you, Ciao, L
Thanks for the extraordinary explanation.
how does this only have 100K views? I think everyone should be required to watch this.
Well done. Your analogies are top notch!!!
Very good explanation,thanks very much,greetings from México.
You are a scientist but yet you deliver lecture from Such point of view that even who hasn't studied it will get it😍😇
ua-cam.com/video/CGxIDbqRsGY/v-deo.html
The theory of everything | The standard model of particle physics
Watch till the end ang share if found informative
I loved the blooper. Dr Don rocks!
Fantastic vid. I knew the model by heart, but this really explains it nicely. Wish I had this when I learnt it, brilliant.
You are really good at what you do. Thanks for the refresher
Holy hell I wish this channel existed when I was in school
Don is great at explaining and teaching!
That was an Amazing Explanation Sir
That is one of the amazing videos. Thanks.
I love the fact that gravity waves have now been detected. It shows the continual change and progress of science. :)
I can't wait until I'm far enough into my education to learn and understand the math and experimentation behind subatomic particle physics :D I'M SO EXCITED (and impatient) ...just thought I'd mention that because this video reminded me to be curious and ask questions :)
So, after 6 years, is your passion still burning? Just curious
Is the Higgs boson officially now part of the Standard Model?
Thanks for the video - it helped answer some of my queries on the atomic make up....which has puzzled me during the O.U. course I am doing.
Its a good job gravity force is so small - otherwise I would be much heavier - its bad enough now trying to loose weight.
But your mass still would be same, assuming the universe would still exist.
I have a few questions 😁 Does gravity affect all sizes of particles? Even Higgs Boson?
Am I the only person who believes that there is no end to how “small” or “elemental” something can be?
If gravity is a space time bending then at the lowest, smallest measurements, then surely you would understand the direction of the force would be negligible against a space time curve and hence it wouldn't apply. Its like resistance of something massive with huge momentum ignoring gravity. Imagine a bending ruler, then focus in on the centre. The closer you get to it the straighter the edges look. Eventually everything travels in a straight line, always.
like it
nice
joppadoni this is a cool thought but it's based on the premise of a center existing in the first place. space time does not have a center , so the idea of a direction of the force of gravity doesn't exactly exist.
indeed, the deeper you go in to a mass the flatter space time becomes, hence no central point, thats why gravity reduces the further you dig a deep, deep, deep hole in to, say the earth. but i dont think that matters, the distances become so tiny. only in black holes would that curvature become a feature, or rather an effect. i think it is here that the answers will be found to link the two.
Excellent, lucid, understandable lecture
Good stuff !! You explain complicated subjects in a simple way. I "wish" you would do a video on Electromagnetism. I understand the words, "a photon" has two fields, electric field and magnetic field; but I think you could make the concept more intuitive.
I have an important question that's been bugging me.
When he explains how bosons serve has particles that bounce between two other particles, the image of the guys playing catch on the shore shows that it pushes them further apart.
But it's supposed to be what keeps particles together? I'm trying to wrap my head around how that works
Jovarans Guplar i believe it’s way way more complicated than that, it’s just an overly simplified example, I urge you not to overthink overly simplified examples as it won’t really help
He's only stating that the bozons apply a force when they move. The example is just to understand the idea. It doesn't mean they move apart
Imma be honest this was way better than Wikipedia for someone like me who has no idea what their doing thx
so the higgs boson gives particles mass, but isn't that what gravity does? could higgs and gravitons be the same thing?
I've always seen gravity demonstrated as a bowling ball on a mattress causing marbles to fall into its depression, so is the mattress in that example representing the higgs field?
Its the first video i have watched from this channel n i subscribed ...😃😀
Thank you for an excellent video.🔬
I think Don’s fingertips have the strong force. They keep connecting. Could he speak if he did not touch them together?
1:18 The trouble with terms like “element” and “atom” is that, almost as soon as we give them to something, we discover that that thing is not so “elementary” or “atomic” after all, and can be broken down into smaller pieces ...
my brain at 2 am: **What exactly is fire and why does it glow**
Sir I have a question.i think gravity is weakest force because it may be using other particles to emit gravity or gravitational waves just like conductor or inductor concept is it possible?
Plzzz someone respond me
I imagine a world where we slowly learn to manipulate and control smaller realms of matter. From chemistry and nano-tech today which harnesses and arranges atoms, to perhaps one day being able to control and manipulate these quarks and other particles, to whatever is inside/hidden under them when we learn to manipulate them.
I hope the trail never ends... or stops getting smaller.
I love your way to explain. Thanks for the videos
Great video. Thank you very much.
Can you do another video of the standard model with the recent discoveries?
Hey
U got into IIsc
Can I ask how to get in and tips plz
just found this channel. awesome.
Amazing video just inspired me to keep studying physics
same
Since you have already started, now it is more like a hostage situation ;)
Edit
Don Lincoln (born 1964) is an American physicist, author, host of the UA-cam channel Fermilab, and science communicator. He conducts research in particle physics at Fermi National Accelerator Laboratory and is an adjunct professor of physics at the University of Notre Dame.[1] He received a Ph.D. in experimental particle physics from Rice University in 1994. In 1995, he was a codiscoverer of the top quark.[2] He has coauthored hundreds of research papers and, more recently, was a member of the team that discovered the Higgs boson in 2012.[3.....from wikipedia......(sir,, take my salute)
Thank god u Made a video sir otherwise I was in confusion
He is seriously good. Just sublime.
Fermilab scientists know what gravity is.
It is a partial entanglement phenomenon.
It so rare and weak because it is rare entanglements and partial entanglemets
to break, well it happens but at very lower rates.
partial entanglements are easily to DEGRADE than pure entanglements among only two particles.
A partial entanglement of many particles has a lower degrading threshold level,
and even the quantum noise level of the void affects it.
If we heat something it becomes heavier because we allow
partial entanglements degrade at faster rates, but not way faster
except in neutron stars, compressed plasma black hole accretion disk etc.
Each new partial entanglement degrades at a more stable quantum state,
but not all energy is transformed into motion, some is spread out as heat.
Of course we have statistically some few pure entanglements, but even them may
degrade, but in that case not with an interaction with a field as partially entangled particels
or with random low quantum noise of the void, but with moving partially entangled particles
or purely entangle particles that crush on the purely entangled one.
I want to that Fermilab for explaining what gravity really is!!!
these guys have relly TOP iq !!!
ok, the Fermigravity or Entanglogravity is one option,
we also have chromogravity [MIT about chomatic information shared partially to other particles
and not only inside one] but some scientists claim
that both theories are the same mathematically
entanglogravity is way simpler though [just a different flavour as many claim]
great explanation
Question: Einstein, with general relativity, replaced "action at a distance" with space curvature defined by massive objects like the sun. What about charge (electric force) or the nuclear force? Is there an equivalent space curvature model for these? Or do we handle these fundamentally different?
Dear Don Lincoln, could you, please, elaborate on how particle exchange can explain the action of forces? For example, it is easy to see the repulsion as it was demonstrated in this video, but how about the attractive forces, how do we explain with particle exchange? Would the boat have to through a sack away from person on the shore? How does particle conservation apply to this context?
Thank you for posting this video.
I have a question, since all things are made of proton neutron electron, and now we know it are based on smaller building blocks explained by the standard model, where do all this particles come from? Can we build these particles, thus we can somewhat create something out of nothing?
And how does antimatter fit in with the Standart modell?
Actually he didnt really make an exhaustive description of the model. On a quick note, each particle has an anti-particle. So we have antiquarks, antielectron (positron) etc etc. Also virtual particles exist as binary + and - particles.
Wow always great to revisit, wow is it that long.
Thanks Dr Don and the Fermilab-YT-Team, every video is an honour to see, educational and entertaining.
Will a Lepto-Quark be found ever? :-)
NEAL
where cane I find all 100s types of found sub partials name other then 6 quacks and leptons ???
Where do subatomic particles get the energy to exchange force particles?
Great video! Any recommendations on a good textbook to delve into this more?
Dr. Why Some particles interact higgs field and why others not ?
Should the quarks, leptons, boson and forces be considered as making up all there is? As in, should they be considered as exhaustively being the building blocks of all reality?
why is no one talking about how Don just firebended on video? What really is going on at fermilab?
Hi, and I would like to ask: I would like to take a shot at some of the problems presented, but to whom would I send my approach?
The example at 6:28 lets me to understand repulsive forces but it doesn't explain attractive forces. Electromagnetism is repulsive for a pair of charges where both are positive or where both are negative, but is an atractive force for a pair os charges where one is positive and the other is negative. Where can I find an example to understand atractive forces?
Interference patterns can create the appearance of movement such that constructive or destructive interference shift the location of the particle by destructive (lower energy) or interfering and cancelling the trailing end of the waves that make up the particle, while simultaneously constructively interfering to create the new front that makes up the particle thus attractive. or by the conjugate of that a repulsive. It's always an interference pattern, waves interacting with waves, whether attractive or repulsive depends upon how the waves combine to create the destructive interference or constructive interference, in relation to the non force particles and forces in play.
Destructive on the first wave front and Constructive immediately after the falling back edge is repulsive; Constructive ahead of the leading wave front, and destructive on the falling back edge is attractive.
We only get the real interesting stuff when dealing with higher energy state forces closer to nuclei like in quarks. That's a whole other ball of wax but basically forces have local privileges based on proximity where they are stronger than other forces and what constitutes a higher or lower energy state..
So, the first paragraph was for one dimension, for another, dealing with conjugate pairs of vectors... we find.
Positive or negative is also a phase force vector function, with (1 particle being + & the other -) the forces being destructive phase amplitude cancelling conjugates creating an energy well (and thus particles move toward each other, toward the lower energy state), whereas + & + or - & - are phase constructive amplitude additive energy states (and thus particles move away from each other, or toward anywhere but the higher energy states between them. So basically, opposites are real and complex sum of squares conjugates and energy cancelling states, whereas same sign are same space 'real' and 'real' sum of squares complementary energy additive states and particles always seek lowest local energy states anywhere but where the energy is doubled. Plus the first paragraph, with both, a very complex constructive and destructive interference package. Add enough particles, and computers even give up the ghost. :-)
+Chip Cooper thanks, now I have something to study (:
Concise. Is the planetary model thingy an appropriate time to mention Rutherford and Bohrs' conceptions (prior knowledge)? At least until 1987?, undergraduate chemistry, physics courses did not mention the SM; and it, of course, made it into no hs texts. Why not?
Very clean presentation
Only great minds able to simplify
Cut, lets try that again, That was very funny it made me laugh,
Nice video as are all your videos, thanks for doing these,
i really enjoy them.