The English rules are missing an important sentence found in the Japanese rules, explaining that when the game ends, the non-losing players are ranked according to who has the fewest liar chits.
To cover the ending about not having much to do, isn't the game a bluffing game also? So you could start lieing about things like what one of the facedown cards are, what card you own, and if anyone says otherwise (like a player who has seen it before) you can say they are lieing or visa versa
![In a Grove - how to play + set up [JLTEI]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/DdZc8-0OJT0/mqdefault.jpg)
![In a Grove - how to play + set up [JLTEI]](/img/tr.png)
The English rules are missing an important sentence found in the Japanese rules, explaining that when the game ends, the non-losing players are ranked according to who has the fewest liar chits.
Thanks for this info! :)
Why would Dice Tower have a Stefan Feld gamer review a micro game like Oink's In a Grove? Zee should have reviewed this.
What makes Ryan unqualified to review the game?
To cover the ending about not having much to do, isn't the game a bluffing game also? So you could start lieing about things like what one of the facedown cards are, what card you own, and if anyone says otherwise (like a player who has seen it before) you can say they are lieing or visa versa
That sounds pretty lame. Thanks for an honest review.