Fascinating subject. I suspect the underlying answer to all of this extends beyond the world of fluid dynamics. I have a theory, but I also have a problem. I have no academic background studying math or physics. Much of what I tried to describe will sound very convoluted.... something I mostly attributed to mine the lack of familiarity with the nomenclature. Regardless, I'll do my best to explain what I'm getting at. Ever since I was a little kid, I thought clouds in the sky looks similar to the plants in the trees. It was something I could never explain, but the growth of a tree seemed hauntingly similar to the growth of a thunderstorm. As an adult scrolling through UA-cam, I learned about mandelbrot in fractal geometry and realized I may have been noticing something similar. The underlying math was way over my head, but it was fascinating. Anyway, my theory... I'll do my best to be coherent. :-) basically, all forms of turbulence across all systems are fundamentally accountable to the same mathematical ratio and this ratio is based on the Fibonacci sequence. The growth of thunderstorm clouds is a natural reaction to turbulent air currents in combination with other factors which manifest a pattern of growth. A maturing plant demonstrates the same characteristics. And let's not forget how spiraling galaxies millions of light-years away demonstrate the same mathematical ratio. For the last five years I have been actively watching and trading the stock market. Primarily cryptocurrency. I've spent a whole lot of time watching price charts and doing technical analysis. During this time, I have observed an undeniable mathematical similar ratio in the growth and fluctuation of share prices to the growth and fluctuation of clouds... as well as pretty much everything else in the universe which is subjected to random influencers... I came to this opinion because I began conceptualizing the movement of share prices as if they were an object moving through a physical space. Just got complicated really quickly because I realized I'd have to apply some terms and conditions to the hypothetical space I was conceptualising. Even worse, these terms and conditions could fluctuate seemingly randomly. Long story short, the final conceptualization involved the price moving through a three-dimensional medium which was akin to a fluid whose density and viscosity fluctuated in a harmonic pattern dictated by a Fibonacci ratio based algorithm. Imagine for a moment various sine waves trying to pulse through a medium whose internal attributes change as well as a fluctuation of static physical laws we might typically take for granted. Long story short, right now my brain is working on a way to quantize turbulence. Apply it to a small world where everything is a grid. Where there are no curved lines. One thing is certain, there was so much left to discover. I appreciate anyone who took the time to read this comment and if you want to lend me a hand understanding this stuff, I would be more than grateful
Hello, I am no physicist but your theory seems interesting. Have you tried to advance it in this span of 3 years? Otherwise I’ll be glad to work with you. Glad that you took the time to explain it.
Fascinating subject. I suspect the underlying answer to all of this extends beyond the world of fluid dynamics.
I have a theory, but I also have a problem. I have no academic background studying math or physics. Much of what I tried to describe will sound very convoluted.... something I mostly attributed to mine the lack of familiarity with the nomenclature. Regardless, I'll do my best to explain what I'm getting at.
Ever since I was a little kid, I thought clouds in the sky looks similar to the plants in the trees. It was something I could never explain, but the growth of a tree seemed hauntingly similar to the growth of a thunderstorm.
As an adult scrolling through UA-cam, I learned about mandelbrot in fractal geometry and realized I may have been noticing something similar. The underlying math was way over my head, but it was fascinating.
Anyway, my theory... I'll do my best to be coherent. :-) basically, all forms of turbulence across all systems are fundamentally accountable to the same mathematical ratio and this ratio is based on the Fibonacci sequence.
The growth of thunderstorm clouds is a natural reaction to turbulent air currents in combination with other factors which manifest a pattern of growth. A maturing plant demonstrates the same characteristics. And let's not forget how spiraling galaxies millions of light-years away demonstrate the same mathematical ratio.
For the last five years I have been actively watching and trading the stock market. Primarily cryptocurrency. I've spent a whole lot of time watching price charts and doing technical analysis. During this time, I have observed an undeniable mathematical similar ratio in the growth and fluctuation of share prices to the growth and fluctuation of clouds... as well as pretty much everything else in the universe which is subjected to random influencers...
I came to this opinion because I began conceptualizing the movement of share prices as if they were an object moving through a physical space. Just got complicated really quickly because I realized I'd have to apply some terms and conditions to the hypothetical space I was conceptualising. Even worse, these terms and conditions could fluctuate seemingly randomly. Long story short, the final conceptualization involved the price moving through a three-dimensional medium which was akin to a fluid whose density and viscosity fluctuated in a harmonic pattern dictated by a Fibonacci ratio based algorithm. Imagine for a moment various sine waves trying to pulse through a medium whose internal attributes change as well as a fluctuation of static physical laws we might typically take for granted.
Long story short, right now my brain is working on a way to quantize turbulence. Apply it to a small world where everything is a grid. Where there are no curved lines.
One thing is certain, there was so much left to discover.
I appreciate anyone who took the time to read this comment and if you want to lend me a hand understanding this stuff, I would be more than grateful
Hello, I am no physicist but your theory seems interesting. Have you tried to advance it in this span of 3 years? Otherwise I’ll be glad to work with you. Glad that you took the time to explain it.