Amazing - Engine Failure Thomas Cook A330 200 at Manchester Airport
Вставка
- Опубліковано 28 вер 2024
- I was at school so my uncle very kindly said he would go to the airport and film the Antonov 225 for me and while he was there he saw and filmed this amazing engine fault!! Thomas Cook A330 200, right engine. he said there was a loud bang and you can see the flames!!! He also filmed the fire engines and I will upload later. This is amazing!!! :-)
This video is managed by Newsflare. To use this video in a broadcast or a commercial player please email newsdesk@newsflare.com or call +44(0)8432895191
Some people saying this was an engine explosion not bird strike. Can anyone say what actually happened? Curious
I was on that plane in seat 26G, when i heared a loud bang and saw the fire, people where screaming and captain made an announcement and cabin crew did a great job keeping it undercontroll.
Everybody was safe though.
Same I was three at the time unfortunately I was sat next to the engine it wasn't a good experience the plane was going to the Dominican republic so on the way back they upgraded us to their 'first class'
It Happend To Us On A Boeing 757 Thomas Vook.The Engine Bursted Into Flames And We Did A Emergancy Landimg At Athens.
I was onboard too with my wife and kids not sure what seat though, nearly didn't go on another plane
What a catch! Pilots reacted very quickly.
Amazing pilot reaction... It took them 4 seconds from failure to brake, arm the spoilers and put reverse... amazing !!
no problem because I understand you are learning. I probably would have named this "Amazing - Engine Failure Thomas Cook A330-200 at Manchester Airport". Keep uploading great videos!
500,000 views Eddie that's amazing.
All your views added up is nearly 1,000,000 (1 million)
Keep up the good work 😉
Yes, take off procedures account for problems like this. Prior to a certain speed you keep the aircraft on the ground, after such speed is reached it is safer to take the aircraft in the air and handle the problem airborne. If it isn't fixable you have the option to come back and land. Awesome video!
Looks very much like a compressor stall. No fire, just a big flash of flames and a bang.
We were also on the plane. Pilot confirmed engine failure 'his first in 25 years flying'. Have Thomas Cook given out any official information?
The bang is a tire blowing once the pilot starts braking after the engine goes . If you look at the other sides landing gear you see the brakes briefly catch fire
nice job by the Captain and crew to bring that plane to a quick safe stop.....
I guess we'll all find out when they complete the investigation. I can say they spent the next 45 minutes carefully checking and cleaning the runway. There was a Ryanair flight just behind coming into land, he had to pull up pretty quickly and ended up diverting to Liverpool. What with the Antonov and this it was a very interesting day at Manchester Airport.
It's back out and flew from Glasgow to Sanford today (TCX246) and arrived in Sanford 51 mins late . Due to fly back to Gatwick later today (TCX 247)
I was there, at the fence off shot and only heard the loud bang from the engine, it was definitely a compressor fault, none of this tyre business and we all believed it was a bird strike at first but it wasn't.
so what exactly the main reason that the engine shot down?
cuz i've heard a BOM sound when it is going to stop.
I liked the 2 birds sitting on the razor wire fence. Looked like one of them said "Dumb Idiots" and the other nodded in agreement and then flew off laughing. j/s lol
Great catch! Liked :)
'Thomas Cook - extra-crispy mileage!'
Thanks mate!!!
Just that when my uncle was there it came over scanner that it was a bird strike??
If that happened to me i would never fly again....one close call is enouf for me....as. matter of fact...I ain't ever flying...cause its too damn scary....did it when i was younger...but now ill take my chances in car...may take longer but road trips are fun...and I've survived every car wreck/engine failure
I wonder how Rolls-Royce will respond to this? Excellent piloting skills there.
I went to level 13 after school and spoke to a guy who saw it at the AVP and he said it said so on his scanner!!! :-)
at least it happened before V1 unlike that 757 a couple years ago
This wasn't a bird strike, it was an explosion inside the engine
compressors are in the front of the engine and when the compressors stalls the pressurized air escapes from the front of the engine, at least that is how I understand it. I did not see any air escaping from the front, only flames and smoke out the back. But I don't know if this is always the case.
I would say compressor stall if it weren't for the bang. The official investigation found out that one of the HP turbine blades failed which resulted in a high power engine surge
Welp, thats what they train for.
Probably went ding ding ding in the cockpit and the Master Warn light illuminated.
I'm pretty sure it wasn't a birdstrike.
I didn't see fly anything into the engine in the two videos I've seen.
I think it was a compressor stall which destroyed the engine.
RIP Thomas Cook
My school time and that’s when my flight arrives..
It's a multicrew reaction. Before V1 the pilot flying has enough runway available to reject the takeoff with full reverse and spolers under certain serious circumstances such as engine failure like this. After V1 the pilot flying has 2 continue the takeoff with th problem in the air The brakes automatically apply when the thrust levers are retarded, the pilot flying brings the aircraft to a stop, the second raises the spoilers, check for engine/wheel fire an informs atc. Pilots prepare 4 failure
0:32 "thats a right heap of shit that"
Never a truer word was said about this A330. The same aircraft has had to close down one engine several times while crossing the atlantic in the last 6 months. It also cost my son a 26 hour delay last year on his way to Sanford. I would never fly on this aircraft as it appears to have one major problem after another.
He's probably upset because that was one of this family going through there.
you can hear the brakes at 0:10...how powerful they must be...
;) yes, i'm sure he will too.
Errrm? RTO breaks? all the pilot had to do was put the throttles in idle as soon as he got the warnings and the plane would have basiclly put spoilers up, thrust reversal and break to max straight away? But yeah well done to the pilot to puting those throttles at idle asap.
Wasn't it a bad idea to engage reverse thrust on an engine which just exploded?
But I guess the autobrake was doing it.
For any non British people watching this, welcome to the language of Manc's.
Yh lad
Bellend
The accents you hear in this video is a mix of Bolton and Birmingham...
And some Scousers
It was the engine not a bird strike :-)
I didn't outrule it any remote reason, but since I cannot see a bird being sucked into the engines in the two vids I have looked at with zoom and slower speed I do outrule a birdstrike ;)
my dad was the captin of that flight
0:28 birds leaving ! before they blame on them
engine you can see the flame.
Taking off and flying with one engine are two different thing. Not "every" commercial airliner can take off or are even certified to fly extended distances with one engine. It's one of the reasons ETOPS exists.
Please fact check before posting or feel more than free to correct me here by posting the takeoff ratings of every plane that carries commercial traffic - which includes passenger AND cargo.
Good thing it happened on the runway and under V1
Compressor Stall!
Bloß gut das die Maschine noch nicht in der Luft war!
wäre auch kein Problem gewesen, die Maschine kommt auch gut mit einem Triebwerk aus, die Steigleistung muss etwas leiden, doch die Runde mit Landung ist kein Problem. Die Piloten trainieren das, und zwar intensiv ;)
wie schon geschrieben....selbst ein triebwerk würde ausreichen.....aber im falle des falles....sinds eben 2 oder mehr...redundanz....und das ist nicht nur bei den triebwerken so.....geht halt darum das die warscheinlichkeit das wenn eins ausfällt das annre auch gleichzeitig mit ausfällt relativ gering ist und noch geringer wenn es 3 fach oder ,´mehr vorhanden ist
don't this was probably a bird strike and the piolit did a great job.
"The airline confirmed the incident aircraft rejected takeoff due to an engine failure. The engine is currently being examined."
avherald.com/h?article=46455b06&opt=0
if you look at Simon Lowe's video it's pretty clear that no tire burst and it was an engine fault. /watch?v=PS1YAX70edc&feature=youtu.be
I agree :-) :D
id hate to be onboard
0:08 :o
bird done that
eh up chuck
Fantastic capture! May I feature this takeoff in one of my next episodes? Of course with a link back to your original video. All the best!
Yes, that's fine- if possible, link our new channel www.youtube.com/@skyspyaviation
Sure, I can do that. Thanks! @@PLANESPOTTEREDDIE
Amazing how far behind the sound of the explosion is!
The reaction was remarkable, they are trained for it.
We were on the plane when this happened. Totally different experience from seeing the video. We were told on the flight that it was an engine failure but sat in the plane just above the opposite wing we heard a loud bang. Credit to the pilot and cabin crew. Stayed relaxed and help everyone off plane, scary stuff though esp with emergency breaking chucking you into brace position.
it just happened to me yesterday, I was pretty scared for a sec
It was not me who filmed it though, my uncle went and captured it for me while I was at school :-) He was going to catch the take off tomorrow but I'm glad he went today so that he caught the birds strike for my channel! Wish I had gone but at least I got to watch it on my camera!! :-)
"He's burst a tire, he's doing a go-around"
I didn't think we Mancs could get any more stupid?
Повезло что в начале разбега бахнуло.
I think it shouldn't be a problem.
Fantastic video, bro! I want to use it in a video for my channel; is it okay? We'll give you credit in the video.and my description includes a connection to your original video. Regards
i'm sorry because I think i came across the wrong way :P I was a tad frustrated with how people were over-reacting to Simon Lowe's incorrectly named video and saw the same thing here. I believe in honesty and naming a video something more spectacular simply to make it go viral and obtain thousands of views is irresponsible. I enjoy Simon's work but he's been around aviation long enough that he should probably know better.
But ive got to say hats off to the pilot for stopping it so quickly
Is a response from Rolls Royce needed? Looked like a compressor surge to me, could be debris or contamination of a blade surface somewhere?
It's not an explosion but a compressor stall. If it would have been an explosion, the whole engine would have blown into pieces btw...
Compressor stall.
This incident sort of stole the AN225's fire don't you think? Like others have said, a very interesting afternoon at MAN, even if it did require fresh underwear for an aircraft full of Cooks customers.
I realise it's pretty serious, but why not just taxi off the runway? One engine is enough for that, and it's pretty frustrating when the thing is sat on the runway holding up traffic.
Oh, and he definitely didn't blow a tyre as the bang you hear, is the Doppler effect coming into play as the engine made the bang, not the tyre at full braking force.
I Don't think it was a Bird strike as there where no birds near at the time. I was there when this happened. I believe something behind the blades blew.
At the airport they will say things in order not to panic people.
In the media and in actual media announcements they speak the truth or near truth.
That was a engine failure. Pure and simple. Not a bird strike. Probably on of the compressor disks. Maybe even the turbine disk. Spectacular anyway.
Wow, I was here & heard the massive bang! Didn't see the flame so thanks for recording. :)
Oi, I'm pretty sure NOBODY (me included) knew what it was a the time and we only know now. I was there and didn't know so shut it.
How do you know? how did you find out
I never said they fly extended distances, I said they can continue a takeoff past V1 and achieve V2 so that they can safely circle and attempt a landing.
And you are going to have to name me a commercial airliner with multiple engines that can't survive losing 1 to a birdstrike that's still certified because that would be a ridiculously dangerous aircraft.
You have no proof for your statement, so I'm not fact checking before you do. Name an airplane, please.
We practice aborts all the time during recurrent training. Not a big deal for an engine failure, but a big deal for systems failure. Our company began a thinking approach for pilots several years ago. The only time you abort after 80 kts is red lights, obvious engine failure, or the airplane is incapable of flying. Aborting after 80 kts in a Boeing airplane anyway involves automatic max braking which usually ends up with tire failures, hot brakes, all kinds of problems. Really fun in fog!
I'm just getting mad when I read about tire explosions and birdstrikes and so on. It's either a conpressor stall or an engine blow out. Some kind of engine failure. A compressor stall should have happened during a change in rpm, so I'm not sure it is but it is possible. Either way. The engine explode, such things happends. And the bang isn't a fucking tire blow out
Engine failure, looked like he also blew a couple of tires on the abort.... I can see one of the fuse plugs give way on the left main landing gear. Luckly the failure or explosion was contained very well in the engine itself. They are designed to shear off with worse failures.
If the plane was in the air and couldn't land ahead, they would carry out a single-engine takeoff, probably perform a single circuit and land with one engine. One of the many situations pilots constantly train to deal with, and the plane is perfectly capable of flying on only one engine.
Only if: No passengers, 1/2 fuel load, emergency support available … This was an aborted takeoff. The AirBus 330-xxx can maneuver on the ground with one engine, but a takeoff and return for landing with one engine is very problematical. ( Kids, don't try this! :>] )
All they had to do was put the engines to reverse and use copious amounts of rudder to counter-act the asymmetrical thrust.
On an Airbus, max brake application and spoiler deployment is automatic in the event of aborting takeoff.
Looks like a bird strike. LOL at the stupid guy commenting on blown tyre, haha!
Burden of proof was on you since you made the statement that quantified ALL commercial airlines are able to take off with one engine. Show proof that they can *all* make V1 with one engine. DC9? RJ100? 747? A340?
Looks like a particularly bad compressor surge, but that's just an educated guess based on nothing more than footage. Unusual nowadays but can happen in strong crosswinds at low airspeeds while the engine is accelerating.
You think you could see a small bird on the video from that distance to the aircraft. Think not.
This has all the characteristics of a bird strike. At 0:31 you can see birds on the fence, the were probably more on the airport.
Damn, what would have happened if the plane took off prior to that happening? Would the other engine allow flight to resume as normal? Sorry, i don't know much about planes! :)
Amazing reaction! Almost immediate rudder correction!
My mum and dad were on this and my mate is te flight engineer for Thomas cook and was on duty! It was a bird strike but melted the components
I don't think AVHerald has done an examination of the engine yet nor has it seen the AAIB report which won't be published for many months.
The engine had a compressor stall, not birdsrike because I don't see a bird.
@sheldonholy......he can't just taxi off the runway after a rejected takeoff. Geeez, do some research before posting nonsense
Rumour going about it was a combustor cap failure
Hi, Myah from Newsflare here. Just emailed your UA-cam inbox & look forward to hearing from you. Thanks.
Lets see how many times we can say " I think he's blown I tyre. By the way do you think he's blown a tyre.
Those two crows looked way too guilty! Especially how they took off once they knew the job was done.
the abort doesn't happen before take-off, what you should have said is that it happened before V1
I can confirm from a Thomas Cook engineer that it was fan failure. A seal burst and it siezed.
lmao hilarious how many "Mr know it all" guys commenting. First of all, it wasn't a bird or a tire, it was a compressor stall.
Actually it was an IP compressor blade detaching and causing a surge.
@@tridentproductions1 stall and surge are both breakdowns of flow. Let’s not split hairs too finely.
@@peteconrad2077 my man replied to an 8 year old comment lol
@@tridentproductions1 and here you are replying back. Thanks.