LUF Long Distance Water Supply

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 23 вер 2024
  • Water transportation over long distances.
    Example fields of application: Water supply for large fires over long distances, In case of floodings to remove water, drinking water supply...
    Basic set-up:
    Two oil-hydraulically operated floating pumps are set down in the water and transport approx. 11,000 litres of water per minute (per floating pump approx. 5,500 litres of water per minute) at 2.5 bar over a distance of up to 60 metres to a booster pump on the mainland. The booster pump transports these 11,000 litres of water per minute at 12 bar over a distance of 6 km in a Ø300 mm hose to its destination.
    Configuration Options:
    Configuration 1:
    After the water transport with the first booster pump over 6km, as described in the basic set-up, a second booster pump can be used to transport the water even further. This means that 11,000 litres of water per minute can be supplied over a distance of 12 km.
    Configuration 2:
    It is also possible to connect two independent units of the pump container in parallel. This means that 4 oil-hydraulic floating pumps and 2 booster pumps are used, which means that 22,000 litres of water per minute can be transported over 6 km in two Ø300 mm hoses to the destination.
    For more information visit: www.luf60.at

КОМЕНТАРІ • 655

  • @lufofficial5711
    @lufofficial5711  4 роки тому +116

    LUF Hose Collecting System: ua-cam.com/video/0DvKCUfZDHU/v-deo.html

  • @1999Cheker
    @1999Cheker 4 роки тому +234

    Funny how no one seems to understand that this system is not intended as a primary water source.
    It is used when you need big amounts of water over long distances like industrial fires or bush fires.
    We are talking 11000l/minute over a distance of 6km. Of course it is not built up in 2 minutes.

    • @1999Cheker
      @1999Cheker 4 роки тому +14

      @wout kwanten 15-30 minutes plus an additional 15 min to fill up the hoses depends on the number of people you have available.
      In germany we have a system that is more efficient and faster. Just look for Hytrans Fire System (HFS)

    • @АйбекКенжегереев
      @АйбекКенжегереев 4 роки тому

      Юг юг э4 юг

    • @Luke-no3dg
      @Luke-no3dg 4 роки тому +1

      Is this not in Germany?

    • @1999Cheker
      @1999Cheker 4 роки тому +1

      @@Luke-no3dg when I saw it right it is austria

    • @hexagonium5798
      @hexagonium5798 4 роки тому

      @@1999Cheker Yes it is Austria. In some scenes you can see the name of the city. I looked it up and "Rankweil" (the city) is located in Austria.

  • @MrDK0010
    @MrDK0010 4 роки тому +112

    This is for establishing a secondary or tertiary supply line for wildfires or large industrial fires. They will have all the manpower and time to do this if the situation becomes bad enough.

    • @martimnunesmartinho6788
      @martimnunesmartinho6788 4 роки тому +3

      MrDK0010 but in case of a wildfire say the fire burns out of control they wouldn’t have time to grab the equipment and run away

    • @MrDK0010
      @MrDK0010 4 роки тому +12

      This is smth you build up far, far outside the immediate danger zone.

    • @eizarzar6212
      @eizarzar6212 4 роки тому

      kbkbk

    • @cvxbxb9550
      @cvxbxb9550 3 роки тому +1

      เดกกกกเฟฟฟฟกตไไำพะัwrhjgtqqqqwei2212124433yyytttstsffgfffffgfffffttt555u5555tu4443335?

    • @prageethsithum4603
      @prageethsithum4603 3 роки тому

      🛺🚑🚐🚎🚍🚌🚋🚋🚞🚞🚑🚉🚈🏥

  • @vikashpatel155
    @vikashpatel155 4 роки тому +78

    California watching this:👁👄👁

    • @tahunkwai5979
      @tahunkwai5979 4 роки тому +1

      i was thinking the same thing that we should have one of each of this full set up in the rural town for when fires happen

  • @sunshubian
    @sunshubian 4 роки тому +76

    “No! You can’t just shoot foam from a mile away!!!” “ haha scdf 3000gpm large monitor vehicle go brrrr”

    • @gautamrana3857
      @gautamrana3857 3 роки тому

      Kjgg🇮🇳🙈📣🤔📣🙂🙂🙂😚😚😙😐☺️🙂🦓🦓🦓🦌🦌🦌🦌🐷🐃🐃🐃🐖🐗🐽🦒🥑🥑🍑🥔🥔🥔🥦🥦🥬🥒🍅🍎🍏🍊🍒🍒🍄🥯🥒🥔🎗🎗🎎🧨🎆🎆🎄🎃🏀🏉⚽️🧱🌎🌏🗺🏜🏝🏘🏥🏤🏪🏪🏭🥁☎️🎹📣📢🔉🔉🔈🔕🎤📠🔋🛄🛄🏧↗️👭🙏👌👍👏🤝🇮🇳

    • @sunshubian
      @sunshubian 3 роки тому +1

      Tfw you like a good comment on a video you’ve watched before and you realise it’s you who made the comment,

  • @DIYTractorstories
    @DIYTractorstories 3 роки тому +1

    Thanks for remember my child hood days.

  • @iamtheanday
    @iamtheanday 4 роки тому +153

    While watching this I realized that I’ve fallen too far into the depths of UA-cam.

  • @finscreenname
    @finscreenname 4 роки тому +142

    I'm sure that little bridge was stupid money.

    • @redstonerelic
      @redstonerelic 4 роки тому +19

      Would you like to drive a firetruck over that hose and possibly burst it?

    • @kevinvermeer9011
      @kevinvermeer9011 4 роки тому +18

      Slightly over engineered, for sure. It's like they designed it with clearances for an F1 car's approach and departure angles, looks like their trucks could have driven over one made of railroad tie cribbing.

    • @finscreenname
      @finscreenname 4 роки тому +5

      @@kevinvermeer9011 You know it went like .....
      The system is 14 million dollars.
      How much is the little bridge?
      $14,000.00
      Throw in two...no like I'm paying for it.....

    • @jansteini9612
      @jansteini9612 4 роки тому +3

      @@charliebingaman571 Carry the Car by muscles... that would be faster than that

    • @alanowa123
      @alanowa123 4 роки тому +10

      It has to handle 30ton/62000lbs fire engines so it has to be tough. Plus it has to be safe. 150% of max load shouldn't be a problem for it.

  • @guy4822
    @guy4822 4 роки тому +106

    This was just a werd flex by this fire department 😂😂😂😂😂

    • @melvincolon6916
      @melvincolon6916 3 роки тому

      Qqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqwwwwwwwwwwweeeeeeeeeeeeeeerrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrr

  • @frostsmaker8966
    @frostsmaker8966 4 роки тому +2

    They look like ant, organization, teamwork. Awesome !!

  • @minidriversouthsweden5137
    @minidriversouthsweden5137 4 роки тому +9

    Sweet system and when I saw the title I immediately thought they better have enough hose in there to get the supply to where they need it and now I see that they have. They know what they’re doing hopefully they do. Interesting to see how they do it.

  • @oddpancakegaming4391
    @oddpancakegaming4391 4 роки тому +91

    I need one of these to water my lawn.

    • @sanjoydebbbarma
      @sanjoydebbbarma 4 роки тому

      BBC vfv mz Ch BN.

    • @ismailayhan8473
      @ismailayhan8473 4 роки тому +1

      0⁰llĺl

    • @carterthreatt9681
      @carterthreatt9681 4 роки тому +4

      There is actually something simmering in my area that collects rain water and then is loaded up and taken to farmers where there is a drought

    • @muthumeena9623
      @muthumeena9623 3 роки тому

      @@carterthreatt9681 p

    • @gokhanguven8403
      @gokhanguven8403 3 роки тому +1

      @@ismailayhan8473 MMO

  • @vulgivagu
    @vulgivagu 4 роки тому +75

    Why do these informative videos have to have crap music

    • @TheNamesArif
      @TheNamesArif 4 роки тому +3

      It's like the kind of music that plays when a crappy superhero is getting ready

    • @averymarkow3815
      @averymarkow3815 4 роки тому +3

      Fuck you that music slaps

    • @UltraNyan
      @UltraNyan 4 роки тому +2

      @@averymarkow3815 Music was dope indeed

  • @momostube9625
    @momostube9625 2 роки тому

    Both comical and fascinating at the same time.

  • @tonysoriano423
    @tonysoriano423 4 роки тому +14

    I’ll deploy it, then putting in my two weeks, cause that’s how long it will take to put back in service.... Fight The Dragon Brother!!!!

    • @EnjoyFirefighting
      @EnjoyFirefighting 4 роки тому +1

      actually it's done quite quickly with its modular layout ...

    • @EnjoyFirefighting
      @EnjoyFirefighting 4 роки тому +1

      @lee rice nope, not really; Of course it's not as fast as simply deploying a hose from a hose cart or hose bay, but it's not like it would take hours to set the system up and get it going

    • @EnjoyFirefighting
      @EnjoyFirefighting 4 роки тому +1

      @lee rice no-one stated that this would work for every location... however in fact many large industries are alongside or nearby rivers and canals, and also commercial and residential areas are often next to lakes, canals and rivers of all sizes. Within a 10 mile radius around my village there are 2 rivers and dozens of lakes, with several lakes already being within 1.5 miles ... and my area isn't quite dominted by lakes; There are some areas which are clearly dominted by lakes or canals throughout a greater area.
      Btw there's the very same issue with long distance water supply when you take plain normal hoses and apparatus, often with multiple Portable Pump Vans / Trucks serving as booster

  • @yousrich46
    @yousrich46 4 роки тому +4

    For those people trying to criticize it without looking further, this system is for long operations requiring lots of water. For example industrials fires, warehouse fires, forest fires also. THIS IS NOT a primary water source, most of the time water from hydrants is used to tackle smaller fires so no they didn’t take long to get set up. Unless you guys have seen fire departments tackle big forest and industrial fires in minutes which I highly doubt.

    • @OldLordSpeedy
      @OldLordSpeedy 2 роки тому +3

      Do not forget you can pump away water from a flooded area too!

  • @YourLocalIceMan
    @YourLocalIceMan 4 роки тому +2

    1:21 that guy was looking like, "did I do it right"?

  • @vindivergilio3482
    @vindivergilio3482 4 роки тому +10

    Can you imagine being the probies having to repack that 12" (?) Black hose and the officer not telling them it was mechanized??? Seriously...can they justify the cost by how many times they will actually need it?

    • @nightfury8440
      @nightfury8440 4 роки тому +1

      It's based on a stock truck chassis. And it might be a swappable bed. Also it's Germany.

    • @EnjoyFirefighting
      @EnjoyFirefighting 4 роки тому +1

      there are some apparatus which are used like once in a decade but the equipment still HAS TO be provided for the case that sth happens. I know an Aerial in a German museum which never ever (!) went to an actual emergency call. In the city where I grew up the FD have a nitrogen vaporizer with an estimated call volume of 1 per year; In the town where I studied the chief told me "I've never seen that Pod Carrier on an actual emergency call before" after I filmed it responding to a fire call.

    • @Timo-M
      @Timo-M 4 роки тому +2

      Night Fury Those are Austrian firefighters.

    • @Cthippo1
      @Cthippo1 4 роки тому +1

      FDNY used to have something similar called the Superpumper system. I think the real use for this is a situation where the municipal water system goes down and you need to supply massive fire flows. Is it worth it? They think so.

    • @EnjoyFirefighting
      @EnjoyFirefighting 4 роки тому +2

      @@Cthippo1 it definetly is; And while these systems can flow even more than the former SuperPumper, the FDNY runs a few of these things today as well

  • @andyhamilton8940
    @andyhamilton8940 4 роки тому +3

    Its like the old "Soupa Pumpah" from FDNY, only more soupah! Gonna have to be sick on hose testing day!

  • @whiteboysixty5
    @whiteboysixty5 4 роки тому +22

    That kink in the supply line is gonna cost them a ton of friction

    • @EnjoyFirefighting
      @EnjoyFirefighting 4 роки тому +3

      they can still supply nozzles which can flow 14,000 gpm

    • @lucasdJAdam
      @lucasdJAdam 4 роки тому +1

      Thats what the pump is for.

  • @fnln544
    @fnln544 4 роки тому +1

    'Feuerwehr Panzers!' I'm sure I wrote it wrong.
    Interesting water pumping system, tracked water cannons and hose bridging system.
    Blessings to firefighters the world over.

  • @uchungnguyen7686
    @uchungnguyen7686 Рік тому +1

    Tuyệt vời lắm 💯😍👍🎤🌼🆗🌎

  • @НиколайД-р6ю
    @НиколайД-р6ю 3 роки тому +1

    Красивые игрушки для ребятни поиграть в пожарников...

  • @auravibes1980
    @auravibes1980 4 роки тому +3

    Nice one of the engineering mile stone. Keep safe keep awake

  • @t-yoonit
    @t-yoonit 4 роки тому +6

    Work smarter, not harder. Pass on this setup. I can see this being viable in a very narrow set of instances of long term operation of exposure protection is required. Setup time is horrendous considering the results. But for a long term operation, having that output on unmanned equipment could be very beneficial.

    • @EnjoyFirefighting
      @EnjoyFirefighting 4 роки тому +7

      " Setup time is horrendous considering the results" which result? Being able to flow large amounts of water with only one truck instead of numerous trucks on one line or running as shuttle. Of course this isn't what you use every day or once a week, but there are definetly scenarios where large capacity pumps are necessary ... not only large structure fires, but especially during floods. Guess that's why the German Federal Agency for Technical Relief came as mutual aid to the USA after Hurricane Katrina

    • @axel5111
      @axel5111 4 роки тому +3

      It's definately worth the effort. German fire engines flow around 2000L per minute, so this system can supply around 5 engines. It'll take at least 5 engines to supply 1 engine over 2 km's. Basically, this thing does what 25 engines normally do. Simple maths: it takes time to set up, but compared to the alternative it's cheaper and easyer to set up. EDIT: I just now realised we are talking 12 km's, wich make the numbers even more ridiculous.

    • @EricWhiteTheGamer
      @EricWhiteTheGamer 4 роки тому +1

      Love it. Also during that storm we needed help. But that’s also why the US has pumpers, tenders and tankers. But Germany’s fire Departments are a lot better then the USAs.

  • @tobysmith3266
    @tobysmith3266 4 роки тому +1

    If only they had this in America

  • @arthurzeller5754
    @arthurzeller5754 2 роки тому

    Yes i had to look up Liters to gallons (11,000 liters of water per minute) 2,905.?? Very Nice amount

  • @ph11p3540
    @ph11p3540 3 роки тому +1

    That is some really severe duty pumper and hoses. Like those big industrial fire trucks with their 12 inch 8000 gpm hoses down near those Texas and Louisiana refineries. Would love to see the Huston fire department with those inundator tank robots.

  • @timothyshibu3098
    @timothyshibu3098 4 роки тому +8

    RIP to the guy that has to roll the whole thing back up

  • @farmerlucas1853
    @farmerlucas1853 4 роки тому +2

    When you realize one of these would be priceless in california rn...

  • @adrianwakenshaw963
    @adrianwakenshaw963 4 роки тому +3

    Very much a balance of justification for the investment and manpower need versus let it burn!

    • @Wa3ypx
      @Wa3ypx 4 роки тому

      Amen Adrian. Unless this is something for long term use, i.e. temporary water main replacement, what benifit is it? That has to be 8" or better hose. How much water does it take to fill this let alone start water movement?

    • @EnjoyFirefighting
      @EnjoyFirefighting 4 роки тому +3

      large structure fires are one scnearios of course, but also keep in mind that there are other scenarios where you have to be able to flow large amounts of water, e.g. floods; Try to empty a flooded area by using the average supply and attack hoses and the average pumps on Engines and Tankers ...

    • @Wa3ypx
      @Wa3ypx 4 роки тому +2

      @@EnjoyFirefighting Hmmmm in 35yrs on the job we never had to do that. But makes sense!

    • @EnjoyFirefighting
      @EnjoyFirefighting 4 роки тому +1

      @@Wa3ypx I know two century floods and several other sometimes severe floods; Some of them lead to mutual aid convoys which basically involved departments from the entire country; Also after hurricane Katrina, apparatus from the German Federal Agency for Technical Relief went to the USA with several high volume pumps trying to empty flooded boroughs; It sure isn't a common scenario happening every year, but when it's necessary I guess department and people are happy that they exist;
      I've also seen a 1st person video from a Dutch FD responding to a structure fire in a warehouse; THey set up this kind of unit right from the beginning to have a great water supply from the nearby canal

  • @c165vin
    @c165vin 4 роки тому +3

    This system has been well thought out, but its not a fast deploy system. It's for a long time and distance water supply. Maybe for use after a earthquake or any long lasting disaster that could use all the water in a city supply. Its use is to augment a water system. I know around here it might look crazy ,but it's well designed.

    • @norrinradd8923
      @norrinradd8923 2 роки тому +1

      California could use this or Lake Tahoe

  • @carlloar7232
    @carlloar7232 4 роки тому +24

    They could use that system in parts of California

    • @overlordgaming752
      @overlordgaming752 4 роки тому +3

      Carl Loar California has similar systems in use, although the Cal Fire usually uses fire retardant, fire lines, and air support to fight most wild fires, they have used very similar set ups for massive industrial firws

    • @overlordgaming752
      @overlordgaming752 4 роки тому +1

      lee rice “long distance water supply” it’s not designed to go up a mountain, it’s a supply line. It’s designed to bring water along a long area that lacks a hydrant or a static source to draft off of, allowing firefighters to have water without using a shuttling system with drop tank and lots of tankers. Misusing a system for something it was never designed to do is no reason to write it off

    • @overlordgaming752
      @overlordgaming752 4 роки тому +1

      lee rice no. No one ever said it was, is California one giant mountain? No. There are flatter areas and large roaming hills. Wild land tactics change between them. If I need to set up a forward supply location to fill up a helicopter to allow it to more effectively do it’s job, I can use a long supply line to do that. If we’re utilizing rolling pumpers I can set a fill point much closer to the location of attack, if we’re trying to hold the line at a series of houses, we can use multiple long supply lines and boost pumpers to set up 1 1/2 attack lines with combo nozzles and create a fog cover to keep the fire back. There’s tons of ways you can utilize a system like this, although I don’t expect someone who doesn’t fight fire to understand the massive utility a system like this could offer the teams in the fields. There’s no way in hell someone’s dragging this line anywhere, supply line weighs enough dry, trying to haul any more then 500 feet with multiple people becomes an extremely difficult task, hense the truck deployment method shown in the video, alleviating the need for someone to drag 10,000 feet + of supply line. This is quite obviously designed to be used to extend my water source not being water up a mountain.

    • @overlordgaming752
      @overlordgaming752 4 роки тому +3

      lee rice fire equipment is pricy, always has been and always will be. The fire department I’m on just finished paying off a 1.2 million dollar 100 foot ladder truck, the tax payers pay for their own safety, how much their willing to fund us will directly affect our ability to keep you safe. You should talk to your local fire department and see if they have the money to keep up with what’s required of them, the personnel, or anything in general. Unless your in a large city everyone is understaffed, underfunded and under equipped. I’m a tax payer too and I know my taxes go to necessary equipment. Btw that truck costs less than a fire engine, so mr tax payer, would you rather help your state buy a new engine at the price of 750,000 dollars or buy one of these for 300,000? To be honest I think it’s pretty shit of you to say something like that, how would you feel if it was your house or your property and the fire department didn’t have something they needed, what if they have to wait 30+ minutes to get water because of the shuttle distance, your arrogance and misunderstanding of the fire service is astounding since you think your opinion means anything at all, instead of being useless waste of oxygen how about you actually volunteer and do something

  • @otgonsurendavga-ochir6716
    @otgonsurendavga-ochir6716 3 роки тому

    thats what i call super team work

  • @southronjr1570
    @southronjr1570 4 роки тому +1

    That's some serious manpower there. I can't recall being on a department with that many Firefighters available on a shift.

    • @EnjoyFirefighting
      @EnjoyFirefighting 3 роки тому +1

      many fire departments can roll up with some good manpower. In my home town they had a station crew of at least 21 fire-fighters at a 47 bay fire station. Many Engines at volunteer departments are staffed with a crew of 9. Last year I was able to film a full house response of 18 units responding at once ...

    • @phatboizbackyardkustomz9006
      @phatboizbackyardkustomz9006 2 роки тому

      We have 7 stations in the county I work at we are lucky to get 5 guys on a county all call​

    • @goldencell1571
      @goldencell1571 2 роки тому

      قطه اطف

  • @robertchinnock8017
    @robertchinnock8017 4 роки тому +19

    We need acouple of these here in Australia

    • @elizabethridenbaugh7731
      @elizabethridenbaugh7731 4 роки тому +1

      Are your guys wild fires still going on?

    • @robertchinnock8017
      @robertchinnock8017 4 роки тому

      @@elizabethridenbaugh7731 hey... no they are out now witch is great.. alot of homes lost and wild life hurt or burnt alive and some live stock hurt as well

    • @johnnz4375
      @johnnz4375 4 роки тому

      It has been around for about 35 years, so what are they waiting for........

    • @yousrich46
      @yousrich46 4 роки тому

      Robert Chinnock they gotta start expanding their airplane fleet to fight fires, it looked to me like they lacked a bit on this.

    • @MrRCGNL
      @MrRCGNL 3 роки тому +2

      Well .. Call the Dutch . . . :-)
      Basically, it's a Dutch invention from the 70's and one of the main manufacturers is based in Holland (Hytrans).
      Over here, every district has several of these standard hook-pods, which can also be transported by civil trucks like those of construction Cie's
      Not only used for Industrial/Forest fires, but also for large normal fires, where the hydrant systems lacks capacity.
      In most districts, there called by protocol in case of 'Large Fire' (3 pumps) or worse.
      Typical deployment time from call to water approx 30mins

  • @jonclem2269
    @jonclem2269 2 роки тому

    It’s all fun and games until it’s time to bed all that hose…..

  • @georgehasler142
    @georgehasler142 4 роки тому +22

    Looks like a lot of hard but it looks like they know what they are doing

    • @grahamscobell1710
      @grahamscobell1710 4 роки тому

      I think the fire would have burnt its self out bu the time they have it all rigged!

    • @pranshsingh4426
      @pranshsingh4426 4 роки тому

      Rdr. Let

    • @pranshsingh4426
      @pranshsingh4426 4 роки тому

      00

    • @christianboer9392
      @christianboer9392 4 роки тому +1

      Graham Scobell usually this kind of equipment would be used in big fires (which could last for days/weeks) without a large enough water supply near the fire. And it also works great if you need a lot of water for those water cannons.

  • @ossi1127
    @ossi1127 4 роки тому +17

    The Hytrans Fire System already exists ...

    • @danieldorr7517
      @danieldorr7517 4 роки тому +2

      HTFS: 3.000l/min @ 10bar & LUF: 11.000l/min @ 12bar... just a little difference ;)

    • @ossi1127
      @ossi1127 4 роки тому +1

      @@danieldorr7517 sorry but the HFS HydroSub 1400 delivers 45000 lpm / 12 bar

    • @danieldorr7517
      @danieldorr7517 4 роки тому

      Ouch... I didn’t even know that it exists. Shame over my head and thanks for the input. 😄👍

  • @robertcallahan9940
    @robertcallahan9940 4 роки тому +3

    Great show of teamwork

  • @zyglo9826
    @zyglo9826 4 роки тому +5

    In my part of the USA, there’s no way the elected officials would ever allocate the funds for a very expensive, limited purpose vehicle that might be needed once or twice every 5 years.

    • @EnjoyFirefighting
      @EnjoyFirefighting 4 роки тому +8

      and then there are situations where mutual aid responses from abroad (!) are necessary to deal with the events which hardly ever happen but definetly will at some time ...
      Concerning your statement "very expensive, limited purpose vehicle" ... look closely at the video. It's a Pod Carrier / Roll-off container truck / hooklift truck: that equipment pod is special and purpose-built, but the truck can be used for dozens of different special equipment pods (containers), so this is far from limited purpose. It's not an entire truck built for only one purpose, but a carrier truck designed to handle all kinds of rarely used special equipment pods. They can range from Heavy Rescue to foam tanks, tanks with frozen carbondioxide and to nitrogen vaporizers, hazmat, decontamination, radiation protection, collapse rescue, crane equipment, basically any special operation you can think of

    • @redbaron474
      @redbaron474 4 роки тому +2

      I'll bet CALIFORNIA is wishing they had at least one of these right now...

    • @OldLordSpeedy
      @OldLordSpeedy 2 роки тому +2

      Do forget one point! It can be a supply hose line *to the fireplace* but it can be a *pump water from a flooded place* back into the river or sea too. Some hazard fire places are far away from water or broken supply hose lines build in earth or flooded places or repair/renew a channel or over flooded dams ...
      It is use here on a fire apparatus but can do so many more.

  • @зоообзорзоообзор
    @зоообзорзоообзор 4 роки тому +5

    Да пока разложат всю эту конструкцию, тушить нечего будет

    • @shipuchk4
      @shipuchk4 4 роки тому

      Реально, так медленно, мне кажется у них недавно был сончас, такие медленные и соные

    • @Wolframcarbid85
      @Wolframcarbid85 4 роки тому +1

      Вы не поняли маленько, это плановая тренирова/профилактика по наполнению прудов водой во время засухи. Так как мелкие водоёмы высыхают изза отсутвия осадков таким образом в Германии пожарные части их заполняют

  • @ninjadrags3962
    @ninjadrags3962 4 роки тому +6

    By the time they set everything up the fire would have burnt half the earth

    • @liamsels3112
      @liamsels3112 4 роки тому +1

      🤦🏼‍♂️ its not that they are not extinguishing while setting these up 😂

    • @ninjadrags3962
      @ninjadrags3962 4 роки тому

      Liam sels but what are they extinguishing with all the equipment needs each other if one part fails your screwed 😹

    • @liamsels3112
      @liamsels3112 4 роки тому +1

      Ninja Drags why do you thing there are two pumps? Think before you speak

  • @blakbird1992
    @blakbird1992 4 роки тому +7

    Wow that’s pretty amazing

  • @mystixa
    @mystixa 4 роки тому +8

    Strange how something can be so over engineered and under engineered at the same time. All the functionality of moving water seems to be fine but the setup is pretty hacked. No wheels on large metal pieces requiring multiple people to carry. No outside ridge on the ramps that would keep vehicles from slipping off. An entire 6" metal wedge piece made specially as an extra connection instead of just tapering the ramp to the ground. etc etc

    • @MushookieMan
      @MushookieMan 4 роки тому +3

      It's made to be stowable. And no "outside ridge" will stop a vehicle from driving off the edge of a ramp.

    • @cantsolvesudokus
      @cantsolvesudokus 4 роки тому +4

      Also remember, nobody knows on which terrain they have to use the bridge. Keeping it simple/flexible might be a advantage here.

  • @pnwRC.
    @pnwRC. 4 роки тому +8

    Neat equipment!

  • @cia_toxicdoge8733
    @cia_toxicdoge8733 4 роки тому +3

    Ok....why
    You set it up and by the time it’s set up the fire your putting out has gone out by it’s self

    • @kadragon3764
      @kadragon3764 4 роки тому

      With the ramps to go over the hose definitely. Judging that it took like 3 minutes on the video, depending on how close the vehicle itself is, we're talking like 15-20 minutes set up time to pull everything out, carry it over, and bolt it in.

    • @creativejamieplays7185
      @creativejamieplays7185 4 роки тому +3

      As someone else commented earlier. This is not for a small house fire. Its for something like a wild fire.

  • @tothemaxx1991
    @tothemaxx1991 4 роки тому +21

    This seems so long winded that I'm unsure how useful it could possibly be.

    • @maxwesthoven5819
      @maxwesthoven5819 4 роки тому +3

      Well I think Firetrucks with built in tanks would arrive to the scene first and immediately start putting out the fire while this system sets up and then it can take over for much longer, because it doesn’t have a small built in tank.

    • @skspieszko30
      @skspieszko30 4 роки тому +1

      I want to tell you that if you have 2,5k litres on firetruck, you will be out of water like just in one minute or so

    • @calvingreene90
      @calvingreene90 4 роки тому +2

      The great distance that the water is moved is what makes it useful. All the water in the world is useless if you can't put it on the fire.

  • @Biffo1262
    @Biffo1262 4 роки тому +3

    Never used ramps over large diameter hose from the hose layer. We just closed the road. No problem. Those hose ramps are very labour intensive and the UK fire services are so low on manpower things like that just aren't practical. The UK fire services used to be the best in the world but thanks to successive governments they are a shadow of what they used to be. As for morale....rock bottom. Oh how I envy countries whose governments put a premium on their emergency services .

    • @EnjoyFirefighting
      @EnjoyFirefighting 3 роки тому +1

      why not? There are also larger ramps which are specificly suited for LDH?! Closing down some roads might not make sense, even for emergency vehicles heading to or leaving the scene; Just because they're low on manpower in the UK doesn't mean that the departments elsewhere are low on manpower as well. Last year I filmed a full house response with 18 emergency vehicles in Germany....

  • @НиколайД-р6ю
    @НиколайД-р6ю 3 роки тому +1

    Посмотрел бы я как этот водяной кунг, как бы он поработал в сибирскую минусяру, пока все разложат, так и все и сгорит, а что сгорит, то не сгниет...

  • @ronaldhofman1726
    @ronaldhofman1726 2 роки тому

    Awesome equipment.

  • @meconlimited3896
    @meconlimited3896 4 роки тому +23

    The best thing of this system is that you can work against gravity with out any pressure loss.

  • @dudemediocre4412
    @dudemediocre4412 4 роки тому +2

    How many years does this take to clean up again?

  • @crystallake6198
    @crystallake6198 4 роки тому +42

    3 hours later, when the pump was finally primed, the entire village had already burned.

    • @thoughtfox2409
      @thoughtfox2409 4 роки тому +7

      This isn't the first or even secondary water supply line. This is for large fires, like forest fires or the swamp fire in meppen, germany last year. They are also good for floods.

    • @dd313car
      @dd313car 4 роки тому +6

      Next one who didn't understand

    • @אוריפלסי
      @אוריפלסי 4 роки тому

      @@thoughtfox2409 why would you wan't to pump in all that water when there is a flood🤪?

    • @thoughtfox2409
      @thoughtfox2409 4 роки тому +1

      @@אוריפלסי Oh, you wouldn't want to pump the water in, but out,. This would come into action after most of the water has receded, but there are still flooded areas. The water would then be pumped into the nearest river or canal. This may also come ito action when large underground buildings, like parking garages, are completly flodded after a major flood,because with regular pumps, it would take ages to pump out that much water. Oh, and your username seems to do weird stuff with the comment box...

    • @nekkedwelder6980
      @nekkedwelder6980 4 роки тому +3

      Until I saw it automatically re rolling I was gunna say holy fuck I’d hate to be the rookie that had to re rack that one

  • @arthurzeller5754
    @arthurzeller5754 2 роки тому +1

    What is the purpose with that system with the small pin in the middle with the connecting pin ??

  • @sh_stash3838
    @sh_stash3838 4 роки тому

    Haben wir schon vor 10 Jahren gehabt!!!
    Einfacher und selbst gebaut!

  • @BumberenzoTheFireEngine
    @BumberenzoTheFireEngine 4 роки тому +3

    Giant hoses!!!!

  • @kennybo-iy2ed
    @kennybo-iy2ed 4 роки тому

    i'm getting rid of that bloody chip pan, burned the kitchen again before the fire brigade got there.

  • @bhagyalakshmikandadi6802
    @bhagyalakshmikandadi6802 3 роки тому

    Wonderful to see these mechine ✌️👌👌👌

  • @tonyfincham6126
    @tonyfincham6126 2 роки тому

    What’s new some old hands may remember the hose layers A, F, S, in convoy from Morton In Marsh in case of war ,

  • @ВикторКузнецов-о1р
    @ВикторКузнецов-о1р 4 роки тому +4

    Клин который вставляется в палец при сборке переезда через трубу, он за сто фиксируется то? Там же нет ничего, он просто в воздухе висит?

  • @brandongustafson7497
    @brandongustafson7497 4 роки тому +2

    Really cool!

  • @ЕркынКадырменов
    @ЕркынКадырменов 4 роки тому +1

    Самаябестолковая вещь у пожарных которую. Довелось увидеть

    • @Wolframcarbid85
      @Wolframcarbid85 4 роки тому

      Вы не поняли маленько, это плановая тренирова/профилактика по наполнению прудов водой во время засухи. Так как мелкие водоёмы высыхают изза отсутвия осадков таким образом в Германии пожарные части их заполняют

    • @ЕркынКадырменов
      @ЕркынКадырменов 4 роки тому

      @@Wolframcarbid85 с трудом верится. Так как там насоса как такового нет. Бандура почти контейнер занимает а еле качает. У меня шахтный насос 60кубовый 3 кВт по серьёзней будет.

  • @sabbathbloodysabbath6058
    @sabbathbloodysabbath6058 4 роки тому +1

    Nice equipament.

  • @HungNguyen91622
    @HungNguyen91622 4 роки тому

    We need that in California now

    • @GMan-yv8cb
      @GMan-yv8cb 3 роки тому

      You need some other things FIRST !

  • @cts
    @cts 4 роки тому

    From the lake they taketh, to the lake they giveth...

  • @nickjohnson7688
    @nickjohnson7688 4 роки тому +2

    imagine learning there's a leak somewhere

  • @alizahraelbldozeir5539
    @alizahraelbldozeir5539 3 роки тому

    Hello my friend writing with great pleasures, 🔔🔔🔔🔔🔔🔔🔔🔔

  • @tejaswaroop528
    @tejaswaroop528 3 роки тому +1

    Does anyone understand how that safety pin helps?

    • @CDB-hf5wn
      @CDB-hf5wn 3 роки тому +1

      Yes. It locates in a hole in a lug on the ramp to stop sideway movement either way

  • @firefighter3671
    @firefighter3671 4 роки тому +6

    You could have 2 engines start drafting in a quarter of the time, and probably flow a comparable volume of water. All without spending what a million plus.

    • @powereddragon2093
      @powereddragon2093 4 роки тому

      Quarter? Like 1/16 of the time. Lol

    • @dawsont933
      @dawsont933 4 роки тому

      @@powereddragon2093 it takes my department 1:30 for a hydrant and 3:47 for pond drafting

    • @EnjoyFirefighting
      @EnjoyFirefighting 4 роки тому

      so two Engines flow more than 14,000 gpm?

    • @dawsont933
      @dawsont933 4 роки тому

      @@EnjoyFirefighting no. 7 of our ladder trucks do. And it takes like 30 minutes plus it's a lot better than having 2 useless ass trailers

    • @EnjoyFirefighting
      @EnjoyFirefighting 4 роки тому +3

      @@dawsont933 trailers? I don't see any trailers here in the video; That container / pod system is mutlti-functional for all kinds of special operations and definetly more cost-effective than purchasing complete seperate trucks for all special operations, especially as some of them are used only a coupld of times a year: tanks with frozen carbondioxide, heavy rescue, nitrogen vaporizers, radiation protection, remote controlled robots etc
      That flow rate wouldn't be common for municipal fire apparatus here, rather for industrial apparatus. Take a flood scenario: do you really want to keep an Aerial stuck with it for several days, not being able to do it's actual job and run emergencies where the ladder is needed?

  • @ffdtower1
    @ffdtower1 4 роки тому +7

    Whole city is on fire...

    • @dd313car
      @dd313car 4 роки тому +2

      Next one who didn't understand when this water supply is used

  • @shaijujose1630
    @shaijujose1630 3 роки тому

    Super

  • @guntergerhardus9086
    @guntergerhardus9086 4 роки тому +1

    optimal und einfach super.

  • @michaelb9529
    @michaelb9529 5 місяців тому

    All of that just to find out the water wasn't on fire

  • @SailorAllan
    @SailorAllan 4 роки тому

    about those ramps to drive over the black hose----those single safety pins in the middle of the connecting pins --how do they keep the pins from moving so they do not shake out of the ramp sections? why don't the big pins have a flange on one end, and the safety pin goes on the other end ?

    • @stevez1094
      @stevez1094 4 роки тому

      I was wondering the same thing.

    • @CDB-hf5wn
      @CDB-hf5wn 3 роки тому +1

      The pin locates in a central hole on the ramp

  • @gw62112009
    @gw62112009 4 роки тому +5

    buy tankers, geez, one guy can operate it.

    • @EnjoyFirefighting
      @EnjoyFirefighting 4 роки тому +3

      Trust me, we have many Tankers covering the entire range, but for the large jobs we have the equipment to operate LDH for water supply and attack, so why not use it? SOme operations simply don't work efficiently by using Tankers ... take floods as an example, how do you pump those large amount of water by using only Tankers? I guess there's a good reason why the German Federal Agency for Technical relief came with high volume pumps as mutual aid to New Orleans ...

    • @piuforte
      @piuforte 4 роки тому +3

      😂Man you can not compare that. This system makes 12000 liter PER MINUTE (about 4000gal). so how many tankers do you want to buy? It's a worst case Szenario equipment...

    • @gw62112009
      @gw62112009 4 роки тому

      @@piuforte rural america has proven tanker use time and again, you can youtube all the tanker success stories, there are many here. Rural america wouldnt have the man power to utilize this

    • @gw62112009
      @gw62112009 4 роки тому

      @@EnjoyFirefighting Cost/the required man power, the training cost for said manpower, how many systems, one for every fire dept? No, so which fd has to stomach the cost of this to mutal aid it to others? Why would they want to?

    • @EnjoyFirefighting
      @EnjoyFirefighting 4 роки тому +2

      @@gw62112009 not one at every department, but here they are purchased by relatively large city FDs and industrial FDs, depending on the location and size of the department sometimes also at FDs in large towns. There are definetly far more specialized types of apparatus and pieces of equipment, of course all of them require training. Let it be desinfection, CBRNE, EOD, nitrogen vaporizer, frozen carbondioxide, remote controlled fire-fighting support units, fire and rescue trains, tunnel fire apparatus, turbine powered aerosol extinguisher apparatus, ...
      These systems aren't meant to be used only in the departments' primary response areas but they can cover a greater area for mutual aid, within the country or abroad if necessary. Some monitors of the Hytrans high flow system are able to handle up to 14,000 gpm ... that's quite a bit more than the former FDNY Superpumper was able to supply.
      Tankers are great, no doubt, but some things simply don't really work with Tankers ... we have tiny to super large Tankers based on single trucks, semi trucks and truck + trailer combinations, but it's simply not sufficient and they are usually more expensive than one such piece of equipment pod

  • @althuelectronics5158
    @althuelectronics5158 3 роки тому

    Good technology

  • @elofos0815
    @elofos0815 4 роки тому

    ich weis ja nicht wie alt das Video ist, aber eines sollte heutzutage klar sein, wenig manpower, viel Leistung sollte das ziel sein. 4 Mann zum aufbau einer solchen Wasserversorgung sind sicherlich nicht viel, aber die ganzen kleinen Schrauben, sowas geht garnicht. das muss mit 5mm Dreck drauf selbstständig verriegeln und somit binnen kürzerer Zeit einsatzbereit sein. so gefummeln mit so kleinen Schrauben die im ernstfall verloren gehen, geht garnicht, schon garnicht dann auch noch mit Handschuhen.

  • @davidurdahl6656
    @davidurdahl6656 4 роки тому +1

    Only if the US west coast had something like this... No, wait, NM, they can burn to the ground.

    • @bryanthornburg8636
      @bryanthornburg8636 4 роки тому

      Lmao, this would be useful in CA anyway, planes are the main defense here.

  • @hockeysyko1
    @hockeysyko1 4 роки тому

    California can use this for forest fires

  • @RobinMichels
    @RobinMichels 4 роки тому

    Gute Idee

  • @superbeast8373
    @superbeast8373 4 роки тому

    Is this an 80's commercial?

  • @johnroberts9560
    @johnroberts9560 4 роки тому

    Wow , that's really cool ,what country is this ? 👍😀🚒

    • @EnjoyFirefighting
      @EnjoyFirefighting 4 роки тому +5

      system was invented in the Netherlands, but the video clips right here are from Austria

    • @johnroberts9560
      @johnroberts9560 4 роки тому

      @@EnjoyFirefighting Oh ok I appreciate your response , thanks my friend !

  • @fladder64
    @fladder64 4 роки тому +1

    Looks like a bigger version of the Dutch "GWT" system, which has a transport hose of 150mm over 3km and no fire robots.

  • @АндрейЦветков-в4э
    @АндрейЦветков-в4э 4 роки тому

    надо было не пожарных заставлять собирать эту систему , а разработчиков . странно что реактивный ствол самоходный , а к фильтру на заборном рукаве никто не догадался приварить пару колес

  • @steviep_0457
    @steviep_0457 4 роки тому

    What was the point of that? To put water from a lake to a different lake? WHY.....

    • @EnjoyFirefighting
      @EnjoyFirefighting 3 роки тому +1

      think about it ... large fully involved structure fires like warehouse fires, flood scenarios etc

  • @martinschreurs1
    @martinschreurs1 4 роки тому +4

    In the Netherlands there are since 1998 more than 100 of similar systems in action. The purpose is to bring water over up to 3 kilometre for feeding firetrucks when needed. Every Safety Region (Kreis) has at least one of these units. See an excercise at : ua-cam.com/video/7lqNZOsOrQM/v-deo.html

  • @bohemoth1
    @bohemoth1 3 роки тому

    The "CONCEPT" is good. But in reality for larger departments such as The New York City Fire Department. This is unworkable.
    The amount of time to assemble and deploy is extremely critical during a FAST MOVING FIRE.
    I really love the HOSE BRIDGING EQUIPMENT.

  • @damianpascual97
    @damianpascual97 4 роки тому

    What’s the point of putting the pin if the pole can still fall out the other end

    • @patrickm9831
      @patrickm9831 4 роки тому +1

      The pins fall into a little bracket that is midline to each section. At 5:05 there is a decent view of the brackets. The smaller sections on the ends of the ramps do not seem to have the same bracket though. Which seems odd

    • @damianpascual97
      @damianpascual97 4 роки тому

      Patrick m I see it thanks for the info

  • @areyouastalker4591
    @areyouastalker4591 4 роки тому

    Der Kamerad ist da aber falsch rum aus dem Auto geklettert...

  • @strikedabox1163
    @strikedabox1163 4 роки тому +8

    Can somebody comment and tell me the lay went. Stopped watching after the guy got off with the space helmet

  • @brandonnichols1434
    @brandonnichols1434 3 роки тому +1

    What is the run time before needing to refuel? Say 50% power for x amount of hours like with forest fires where your at it for days and having trucks come and fill there water holds

  • @alinsonassis
    @alinsonassis 4 роки тому

    That's a city size humidifier

  • @GioSerg94
    @GioSerg94 4 роки тому

    I have to wonder what the advantages of these long lays are over tankers. Surely the friction loss is too high for this to be that beneficial.

    • @Jehty_
      @Jehty_ 4 роки тому +1

      Tank trucks can carry 20.000 to 43.000 liter.
      This system can transport 11.000 liter per minute.
      Let's assume you need the water in a distance of 6km, a tanker can travel between these two points at 50km/h and holds 30.000 liter.
      So just to deliver the same amount of water this system does with 2 trucks you would need 5 tankers. (and that doesn't include the time it would need to fill the tankers)
      And on top of that, after the LUF system is deployed both trucks can be used for something else (both are swap-body-vehicles)

  • @FISHH00KS
    @FISHH00KS 3 роки тому

    The title should read "This is why you pay a 20% VAT"

  • @saave47
    @saave47 Рік тому

    👍👍👍👍👍

  • @kennethhuff7158
    @kennethhuff7158 4 роки тому

    Impressive.

  • @watertriton
    @watertriton 4 роки тому +2

    It looked like the clouds were delivering a lot more water that day.

  • @MatthewMello
    @MatthewMello 4 роки тому +1

    I love to know how they were able to draft with those soft hoses without them collapsing.

    • @kenmeinken8115
      @kenmeinken8115 4 роки тому +3

      It looked like those were hydraulic operate pumps they floated out with the hoses.

    • @MatthewMello
      @MatthewMello 4 роки тому +1

      @@kenmeinken8115 That is new to me, and something I haven't seen. I am use to seeing a hard suction hose hooked up to a pumper.

    • @axel5111
      @axel5111 4 роки тому +4

      @@MatthewMello The units in the water are floating//semi-submursible waterpumps indeed.

    • @mk84ldb
      @mk84ldb 4 роки тому

      @@MatthewMello I could use some hard suction

    • @roberthohberg2666
      @roberthohberg2666 4 роки тому +1

      They are not sucking; the large machinery in the water are pumps (hydraulically powered via the two black lines connected to each) they force water into the soft tube

  • @dconrad246
    @dconrad246 4 роки тому

    The part that goes in the water should be remote drivable i think, hell put it on an arm like a concrete pumper. Then personnel doesn't have to go near the source and possibly get hurt with that much weight.