That's a real question, because back in biblical times, if a man committed adultery, the crime was not against his wife. It was basically a property crime and the.victim was the male owner (father or husband) of the woman he cheated with. His wife, being essentially his property, had nothing to say about it. Whereas, if a wife cheated, her husband could divorce her and probably would. No man wants to take a.chance on his support going to children that aren't his. And no man wants to be publicly humiliated as it is seen he can't keep his wife under control. These are bronze age ideas. How well they translate to modern times is debatable. But those who want us to uphold "biblical marriage" should remember that it was a property exchange, nothing more, and brides were 13 year old girls who were given or sold like livestock to men three times their age.
Question: Would it be acceptable to have a Bible that includes the Apocrypha after the New Testament, or should it be integrated within the Old Testament? This applies specifically to a Protestant Bible that has the Apocrypha at the end of the New Testament, or between the Old and New Testaments.
What did Jesus mean in Matthew 19:9? It seems not much has changed since Moses day, and some women are still at risk. In the past I sheltered abused women. Could Jesus be validating that exception? Maybe He's reinstituting it. I'm not a theologian and guessing is dangerous. Please explain what it means.
Basically if you and your partner are married, living together and having sex anything outside sexual relationship is committing adultery and is not a reason to divorce and marry another. However you can choose to divorce and/or separate if you want to but if you marry again you commit adultery and if you have sex outside of marriage you are committing sexual immorality and neither can inherit the kingdom. So the bottom line is if you divorce you stay unmarried or reconcile.
So what does the Lord mean by that then? It seems you are just dilly-dallying to protect the church's position on divorce. The Lord clearly stipulated that exception because He knows how infidelity is so devastating to the betrayed spouse.
Well, Jeff, I would like to hope that the church would be willing to except divorce in a situation where the spouse was mentally, morally, and physically, abused in the marriage. To the point that the children knew that the treatment of the mother was wrong to the point where the 10 year-old son had a book where he drew maps on how to get his mother out of the house, if his father took off on her again. The woman who I am speaking of, got to a place where she was actually willing to take her own life, then remain in the marriage. I would hope that the good Lord would look down upon the situation, and realize that a divorce was the most intelligent thing that could be done to save the woman’s life, she’ll never remarry, she won’t even have another relationship with anyone. So adultery isn’t even an issue, but safety was and she .risked her life as long as she could. Certainly, God saw this. I would hope that someday if she found someone who would treat her the way she should’ve been treated. If she wished marry she would be able to. Just my two. Cents.
Amen
What if the husband commits adulatory?
That's a real question, because back in biblical times, if a man committed adultery, the crime was not against his wife. It was basically a property crime and the.victim was the male owner (father or husband) of the woman he cheated with. His wife, being essentially his property, had nothing to say about it. Whereas, if a wife cheated, her husband could divorce her and probably would. No man wants to take a.chance on his support going to children that aren't his. And no man wants to be publicly humiliated as it is seen he can't keep his wife under control.
These are bronze age ideas. How well they translate to modern times is debatable. But those who want us to uphold "biblical marriage" should remember that it was a property exchange, nothing more, and brides were 13 year old girls who were given or sold like livestock to men three times their age.
Forgive and tell them to sin no more.
did u watch the whole video? he explains it clearly. u cant divorce
@@velonaut303if God forgives someone in an adulterous marriage and they stay in that marriage they did not “go and sin no more”
You didn't actually answer what Matthew meant there.
There is a better explanation on Catholic Answers youtube. “Did Jesus allow for some divorce?” With Karlo Broussard
@@dohamal Thanks! I'll check that out.
Please clarify what Jesus meant in Matthew.
Question: Would it be acceptable to have a Bible that includes the Apocrypha after the New Testament, or should it be integrated within the Old Testament? This applies specifically to a Protestant Bible that has the Apocrypha at the end of the New Testament, or between the Old and New Testaments.
What did Jesus mean in Matthew 19:9? It seems not much has changed since Moses day, and some women are still at risk. In the past I sheltered abused women. Could Jesus be validating that exception? Maybe He's reinstituting it. I'm not a theologian and guessing is dangerous. Please explain what it means.
Basically if you and your partner are married, living together and having sex anything outside sexual relationship is committing adultery and is not a reason to divorce and marry another. However you can choose to divorce and/or separate if you want to but if you marry again you commit adultery and if you have sex outside of marriage you are committing sexual immorality and neither can inherit the kingdom.
So the bottom line is if you divorce you stay unmarried or reconcile.
Can you get an annulment if you have children together already?
Yes, I did, but each circumstances
Yes, children do not impact the validity of the sacrament.
So what does the Lord mean by that then? It seems you are just dilly-dallying to protect the church's position on divorce. The Lord clearly stipulated that exception because He knows how infidelity is so devastating to the betrayed spouse.
Well, Jeff, I would like to hope that the church would be willing to except divorce in a situation where the spouse was mentally, morally, and physically, abused in the marriage. To the point that the children knew that the treatment of the mother was wrong to the point where the 10 year-old son had a book where he drew maps on how to get his mother out of the house, if his father took off on her again. The woman who I am speaking of, got to a place where she was actually willing to take her own life, then remain in the marriage. I would hope that the good Lord would look down upon the situation, and realize that a divorce was the most intelligent thing that could be done to save the woman’s life, she’ll never remarry, she won’t even have another relationship with anyone. So adultery isn’t even an issue, but safety was and she .risked her life as long as she could. Certainly, God saw this. I would hope that someday if she found someone who would treat her the way she should’ve been treated. If she wished marry she would be able to. Just my two. Cents.
Hope that wasn’t you, but God Bless cuz we know it was. Remarrying without an annulment is the problem anyway, honey. I should know. 🥲
Thank you for your kind words. You were right thank you again it means more to me than you know.