Balancing Chemical Equations

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 5 сер 2024
  • Atoms don't just appear and disappear into thin air, you silly goose. What are you, a magician? When we have a chemical equation we will have to balance it. Here's how to do it!
    Watch the whole General Chemistry playlist: bit.ly/ProfDaveGenChem
    More AP Chemistry review materials from me: bit.ly/URPDave
    Organic Chemistry Tutorials: bit.ly/ProfDaveOrgChem
    Biochemistry Tutorials: bit.ly/ProfDaveBiochem
    Biology Tutorials: bit.ly/ProfDaveBio
    Classical Physics Tutorials: bit.ly/ProfDavePhysics1
    Modern Physics Tutorials: bit.ly/ProfDavePhysics2
    Mathematics Tutorials: bit.ly/ProfDaveMaths
    EMAIL► ProfessorDaveExplains@gmail.com
    PATREON► / professordaveexplains
    Check out "Is This Wi-Fi Organic?", my book on disarming pseudoscience!
    Amazon: amzn.to/2HtNpVH
    Bookshop: bit.ly/39cKADM
    Barnes and Noble: bit.ly/3pUjmrn
    Book Depository: bit.ly/3aOVDlT

КОМЕНТАРІ • 190

  • @calanonash
    @calanonash 2 роки тому +64

    In 7 videos of under 5 minutes each I managed to understand chemistry better than I did in 7 years of school. Thanks, Dave.

  • @youngmik9534
    @youngmik9534 5 років тому +295

    thank you for being a real chemistry teacher, now i'm not confused

    • @Edusetucbsespeedmaths
      @Edusetucbsespeedmaths 3 роки тому +7

      Every Topic is equally easy when concepts gets cleared.

    • @rinyeongi6322
      @rinyeongi6322 2 роки тому +1

      @@Edusetucbsespeedmaths but school system doesn't understand that :/

  • @gamergirlnatalia6715
    @gamergirlnatalia6715 3 роки тому +28

    Thank you chemistry Jesus lol

  • @darrenmeyers5271
    @darrenmeyers5271 3 роки тому +52

    This teacher is brilliant, well organized and articulate! Lessons are concise and direct. Thank you Professor Dave!

  • @idealthinker101
    @idealthinker101 5 років тому +73

    I wished that my school teachers also taught me this way !

  • @psychologycontact9921
    @psychologycontact9921 6 років тому +44

    My first time here. I am loving your channel like maaaaad! Thank you so much you real human angel.

  • @sharmaineizar6276
    @sharmaineizar6276 3 роки тому +18

    I'm glad I found you! you explained it god damn well. I felt so dumb in my Chemistry class before, but now I get it thanks to you!

  • @hanumavattem3106
    @hanumavattem3106 3 роки тому +9

    I wanna meet you and thank you for all of your videos with each and every atom in my body..

  • @oregonvulture
    @oregonvulture 6 місяців тому +3

    Holy shite, I got my associates degree 10 years ago but I failed introductory CHEM. I'm going back for a transfer degree in fall so I'm preparing for preparatory CHEM and MTH. I never understood balancing equations but I just did all of the practice questions right. Thank you, Professor Dave 😭😭

  • @josephfarace6633
    @josephfarace6633 Рік тому +4

    i have a exam in 2 days and i just wanted to say you taught me like everything in the world and i love you so much like bro words cannot explain how happy i am right now like i feel like a whole new person the knowledge i just gained is unmatched your literally a genius

  • @ryderb.845
    @ryderb.845 3 роки тому

    This is the only channel that doesn't feel like it just gives me a half-assed explanation, it only gives me information overload

  • @kayk2631
    @kayk2631 2 роки тому +5

    Thank you! I missed two days of school and this helped me catch up in 4 minutes! You're a really great teacher!

  • @mememe7495
    @mememe7495 7 років тому +14

    Your videos are so helpful! Thank you!!

  • @liquidtompls5666
    @liquidtompls5666 5 років тому +19

    Thanks dude, I have a bad science teacher, now finding this I am finally getting it!

  • @Claudius_Ptolemy
    @Claudius_Ptolemy 2 роки тому +3

    I finally understand how these equations work, thank you very much for this lesson Professor! :)

  • @thaddeusgroup3655
    @thaddeusgroup3655 2 роки тому

    Wow! professor Dave, you are a life saver. I understand balancing equation for the first time in my life. God bless you.

  • @ShutterbugVideo671
    @ShutterbugVideo671 Місяць тому

    Your explanations make a lot more sense than my chemistry classes did in high school or in college!!

  • @lakishaberry7250
    @lakishaberry7250 2 роки тому +1

    Thank you professor Dave! You are the best teacher for everything.

  • @shashwatsrivastava5348
    @shashwatsrivastava5348 7 років тому +11

    I just love ur videos professor

  • @julenecoetzee8748
    @julenecoetzee8748 5 місяців тому +1

    thank you so much!!! I had literally no idea what a balanced chemical equation was or how to do it and its really important cuz I am in grade 10

  • @0hajar
    @0hajar 4 роки тому +1

    Thank you for every think 💛 really you are great teacher...

  • @cinammonrollss
    @cinammonrollss 3 роки тому +1

    Short videos and meaningful loved them

  • @angelicamaymartinez990
    @angelicamaymartinez990 3 роки тому

    Thanks for this! I easily understand our lesson now

  • @redness4815
    @redness4815 Рік тому

    My chemistry professor made this sound so confusing. I completely understand the concept thanks to you!

  • @thesandwich7151
    @thesandwich7151 2 роки тому

    Thank you so much professor Dave.

  • @bogboyz
    @bogboyz Рік тому

    idk if you still answer questions on these but how come in the last example you only used the coefficient of water molecules (the 4 in 4H2O) and multiplied by 1, when you used the coefficient and exponent for carbon dioxide (3•2)??

  • @kiancanale3449
    @kiancanale3449 Рік тому

    Thank you, Sir Dave!

  • @Parfaitt401
    @Parfaitt401 4 роки тому +5

    u dropped ur crown king

  • @jamesbas5209
    @jamesbas5209 7 років тому +21

    I haven't looked at the comprehension answers just yet because I want to workout the questions on my own before checking if I am right or wrong. My question lies with #2 AgF + CaCl sub 2 -------> AgCl + CaF sub 2
    When balancing this equation, why does F fall off of Ag and become a part of Ca with two atoms?

    • @ProfessorDaveExplains
      @ProfessorDaveExplains  7 років тому +19

      to understand this we must understand ionic bonds and ionic solids! this will all be revealed as you move forward, in the tutorials about the chemical bond, intermolecular forces, solutions, etc.

    • @johnmayes9649
      @johnmayes9649 3 роки тому +6

      The reason F falls off of Ag and becomes part of Ca is because F is more attracted to Ca than Ag. The Ca, which is Calcium, has two electrons that it gives to F. The only problem is, F would love to accept one electron from Ca but not two. The solution? F goes and gets another F to join him and the two F's each keep one electron from Ca. They now become a team of three: One Ca and two F's. This is what happens in chemical reactions, they change partners.

    • @bait5257
      @bait5257 2 роки тому

      @@ProfessorDaveExplains how can we do the comprehension no. 4?

    • @gdaymates431
      @gdaymates431 2 роки тому

      @@johnmayes9649 they sound like swingers. Haha

  • @sandramichelsen6315
    @sandramichelsen6315 4 роки тому

    THANKS. GREAT EXPLANATION. I LOVE IT

  • @ellaaaaa3453
    @ellaaaaa3453 2 роки тому

    Thanks man. Very helpful! 👍

  • @rochelroma180
    @rochelroma180 4 роки тому +2

    thank you po! 😊😊❤️

  • @vamp5417
    @vamp5417 4 роки тому +2

    Thx for the help man
    😇

  • @organic_angel
    @organic_angel 7 років тому +2

    Thank you

  • @TYD20
    @TYD20 Рік тому

    Thanks Professor Dave

  • @thelastdemonicwolf7989
    @thelastdemonicwolf7989 4 роки тому

    thanks, Dave

  • @atoz4399
    @atoz4399 2 роки тому +1

    This is a great channel.

  • @deadpiratetattoo2015
    @deadpiratetattoo2015 5 місяців тому

    I might be a nerd, but balanced equations and dipole moments, angstrums and the like was my favorite. But, I also like the old style chemistry names and stuff.

  • @12bucklemysh0e
    @12bucklemysh0e 3 роки тому +2

    no one:
    me, dancing to the music at 3:29: 💃💃

  • @user-vs5cq2xf9k
    @user-vs5cq2xf9k 9 місяців тому

    Thanks professor dave🎉

  • @Sorrytosay792
    @Sorrytosay792 6 років тому +2

    that's good explaination

  • @TonyWoodstock-bz6gl
    @TonyWoodstock-bz6gl 8 місяців тому

    THANKS!!

  • @triple_gem_shining
    @triple_gem_shining 10 місяців тому

    balancing chem equations is fun! neat littlte puzzle

  • @Anthroposaur
    @Anthroposaur 2 роки тому

    HE TAUGHT IT IN 3 MINS!?!?!? dude this took like 2 weeks in high school... thank you so much!

  • @scottflix6466
    @scottflix6466 5 років тому +1

    Thanks Sir

  • @stackattack7
    @stackattack7 4 роки тому +2

    C3H8 + O2->3CO2 + 4H20 dealing with oxygen there will be 2 on the left and (3×2=6 + 4×2=8 so 14 not 10) or am i missing something because when you said 4×1 i was confused where you got the 1?

    • @stackattack7
      @stackattack7 4 роки тому +2

      Nevermind...... i realized i was looking at hydrogen not oxygen haha

  • @3runjosh
    @3runjosh 5 місяців тому

    I thought I was just a stupid person with a failed brain and maybe I was but in 2 minutes I was able to learn how to do this and get them all correct except number 4. Thank you, there is hope for me. Back in 2002 when I was 13/14 years old I just couldn't understand this.

  • @MukeshKumar-gj5cz
    @MukeshKumar-gj5cz 5 років тому

    Thank u professor

  • @venkateshp.5232
    @venkateshp.5232 4 роки тому +1

    Hey thanks buddy!

  • @goose66666
    @goose66666 Рік тому

    i love you so much you're a life saver

  • @amani5953
    @amani5953 3 роки тому

    your explanation is amazing وفالعربي يجنننن مرهه

  • @kelman9192
    @kelman9192 4 роки тому +2

    truly sent from heaven

  • @adityashankar5267
    @adityashankar5267 5 років тому

    Wow...now i can understand this topic

  • @gnation855
    @gnation855 2 роки тому

    Thanks teacher

  • @euphoria_iq
    @euphoria_iq 4 місяці тому

    can someone exlpain number 4 of the end checking comprehension questions bc i do not understand that one

  • @RapidBlindfolds
    @RapidBlindfolds 4 місяці тому

    the way the coefficients were written differently at 1:11 confused me, with one of them in front in normal text and the other behind in subscript, but now i understand its because 2Na represents 2 sodium atoms hanging out, whereas 2 chlorine atoms come together to create a covalent bond.

  • @fabriziom2661
    @fabriziom2661 6 років тому +2

    What would be the best way to balance longer chemical equations? Is it just seeing the needed number with more practice?

    • @ProfessorDaveExplains
      @ProfessorDaveExplains  6 років тому +4

      yes i think just repetition! you start to get an intuition for which element to balance first and what not. also check for polyatomic ions, those can be balanced as a whole, without having to split them up into elements.

    • @carultch
      @carultch 2 роки тому

      I recommend up setting up a system of linear equations to do it. Assign a lowercase letter as a placeholder for each coefficient, and go in alphabetical order for each molecule you have. Tally up the number of atoms for each elemental species, in terms of your coefficients. Assume the first coefficient a=1. Then solve the system of linear equations, just like it were a math problem. Matrices can help when you have numerous equations.
      It is likely that you will get fractional coefficients, and when you do, this just means you need to multiply a by the least common multiple of all the denominators, so that every coefficient becomes an integer.
      For instance, given the burning of Isopropyl alcohol:
      C3H8O + O2 -> CO2 + H2O
      Assign lowercase letters as coefficients:
      a C3H8O + b O2 -> c CO2 + d H2O
      Equate counts of each elemental species on each side:
      Carbon: 3*a = c
      Hydrogen: 8*a = 2*d
      Oxygen: a + 2*b = 2*c + d
      Assume a = 1
      Solve for our unknowns:
      a=1
      b=9/2
      c=3
      d=4
      Because we got a fractional result for b, i.e. 9/2, we have to multiply all of the above numbers by 2, to make them all whole numbers. Our balanced equation becomes:
      2 C3H8O + 2 O2 -> 6 CO2 + 8 H2O

  • @amukelanimoema5117
    @amukelanimoema5117 3 місяці тому

    thank you professor Dave u saved me thank u thank u thank u ❤❤❤❤❤❤

  • @KD-vg2yn
    @KD-vg2yn 6 років тому +2

    I freaking love you

  • @KanoBoom
    @KanoBoom 3 роки тому

    0:50 Correction: NaCl is a ionic 'compound', not a molecule

  • @pljeskavica13
    @pljeskavica13 Рік тому

    well thanks dave

  • @tyranmoses5521
    @tyranmoses5521 3 роки тому

    thnks proff dve

  • @toro_maine6599
    @toro_maine6599 2 роки тому

    I love you Dave

  • @Rico-Suave_
    @Rico-Suave_ 4 роки тому

    luv your videos, you did a great job of organizing the topics, had a question, I never understood why does burning(fire) only involve oxygen and not nitrogen which is also in the air ? I guess I don't understand fire

    • @carultch
      @carultch 2 роки тому

      The triple bond of nitrogen is a lot more energy intensive to break, that most of the nitrogen gas in the air is just a spectator gas to the fire. There is about as much nitrogen in the exhaust as there is in the original air. Some of it is consumed to make unintended products of combustion like NO and NO2, but most of it remains in its original compound of elemental nitrogen N2. The nitrogen gas might as well be an inert gas, for most chemical reactions.

  • @jelemaamor85
    @jelemaamor85 2 роки тому

    thank you

  • @cozypunk2613
    @cozypunk2613 5 років тому +7

    i'm love u,saved mi life

  • @hanzsintim
    @hanzsintim 2 роки тому

    This is so easy when you explained it

  • @patatatatatata
    @patatatatatata 3 роки тому +12

    Professor Dave thanks for the video! However, what about equations that have ions as reactives or products, how do we balance the electrical charges.

    • @ProfessorDaveExplains
      @ProfessorDaveExplains  3 роки тому +12

      check out my tutorial on balancing redox reactions

    • @patatatatatata
      @patatatatatata 3 роки тому +6

      @@ProfessorDaveExplains thank u so much Professor 🖤

  • @ahyeah7943
    @ahyeah7943 Рік тому

    I SOOOOOOO LOVEEEEEE YOUUUU PROFESSOR DAVEEEEE... EXPLAINS ❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤

  • @OfentseKhoza-vp9go
    @OfentseKhoza-vp9go 24 дні тому

    Thanks now I can balance chemical equations

  • @HyperTheKappa
    @HyperTheKappa Рік тому

    Not to be a nerd but balancing equations was some of the most fun I had in school

  • @ahmedshamree677
    @ahmedshamree677 Рік тому

    Prof
    What about the hydrogen produced by OH- and H+

  • @Calviinx
    @Calviinx 8 місяців тому +3

    Science is traumazing

  • @jhelseaamarixe4475
    @jhelseaamarixe4475 4 роки тому +5

    Hi. I find #4 in comprehension confusing. Is there a trick for that?

    • @devikagopakumar8906
      @devikagopakumar8906 3 роки тому +9

      Did you get it? Hope you did but I am showing you anyways(there is no trick btw)
      H3PO4 + KOH ----> K3PO4 + H2O
      H - 4 | H - 2
      P - 1 | P - 1
      O - 5 | O - 5
      K - 1 | K - 3
      ( have this in your mind or jot it down , you don't have to correct anything in the main equation yet, first we are gonna figure out the numbers to be written in the eqn.)
      1. H first. Not balanced.
      2. Then P . Its 1 on both sides. Balanced.
      3. O. Okay....
      4. Finally K . It is 3 on the product side. We have to make the reactant side also 3. There is only one way. We write 3 on the reactant side. ( KOH changes to 3KOH)
      Current eqn : H3PO4 + 3KOH -----> K3PO4 + 3H2O
      5. Okay..now return to H. (See the current eqn)We've got total six H in the reactant side( Three H of H3PO4 and 3KOH) And also six H in the product side..... 3H2O (3×2) H balanced:))
      6. Now we have O. There are seven O in the reactant side ( four in H3PO4 and three in 3KOH .. 4+3). And also seven in product side.( four in K3PO4 and 3 in 3H2O....4+3) O is balanced.
      [ Just like that . You don't have to write the figures at first, estimate them and keep looking ]
      Therefore balanced eqn:))
      #4)H3PO4 + KOH ----> K3PO4 + H2O
      H3PO4 + 3KOH -----> K3PO4 + 3H2O

    • @-_wkwyy
      @-_wkwyy 2 роки тому

      @@devikagopakumar8906 Thank you man

    • @devikagopakumar8906
      @devikagopakumar8906 2 роки тому

      @@-_wkwyy You're welcome bro...

  • @lochanshivaram6079
    @lochanshivaram6079 Рік тому

    How do you even approach the 4th problem?

  • @emily-le6tv
    @emily-le6tv 6 років тому

    Explains sooo much better than mrs charlesworth. Are you a teacher at school?

  • @oliverlopez4236
    @oliverlopez4236 7 років тому +1

    Why when balancing some polyatomic ions, they disassemble ?

  • @ryedeligero5511
    @ryedeligero5511 4 роки тому +1

    life saver!!!!!!

  • @eelio8469
    @eelio8469 3 роки тому +1

    ...I don’t get it. How do you expect us to know what you just unbalanced if your not going to immediately check on it? I need to do that or I’m going to forget. If I unbalance something I will immediately fix it idk what I’m doing wrong

    • @carultch
      @carultch 2 роки тому

      I recommend a linear algebra approach. Assign a variable as the coefficient of each molecule. Go in alphabetical order, and use lowercase letters. Set up a system of linear equations to equate the population of each element's atoms on both sides of the equation, and solve by your algebraic method of choice. Assume the first coefficient a=1, so that your number of equations matches your number of unknowns.
      From time to time, you will get fractional coefficients with the above method. This is not acceptable as an answer in Chemistry, because you can't react a fraction of a molecule. Therefore, you then have to multiply through to clear all the fraction denominators. Find the least common multiple of all the fraction denominators, and multiply through by that number. You will then have the smallest possible group of whole number coefficients that balance the chemical equation.

  • @sambhavpathak473
    @sambhavpathak473 2 місяці тому

    Aacha padhate ho sir sabash

  • @Jnrlionndogg
    @Jnrlionndogg 4 роки тому +2

    it kinda looks like he is reading off of something lol but he is great

  • @josefonseca6772
    @josefonseca6772 2 роки тому +1

    Thank you chemistry jesus

  • @daviddaman38
    @daviddaman38 7 місяців тому

    this is a big w

  • @tlhe_ovIyloS
    @tlhe_ovIyloS 6 місяців тому

    In case you don’t know, CxHy+(x+y/4)O2=xCO2+(y/2)H2O

  • @ComputerCurry
    @ComputerCurry Рік тому +1

    3:36 this is the 2nd time I've watched this video, and I still got #4 wrong.

  • @gamerdonuts5633
    @gamerdonuts5633 6 місяців тому

    what is going on i need therpy plz help me

  • @rassimsimou1594
    @rassimsimou1594 2 роки тому

    Good

  • @borttorbbq2556
    @borttorbbq2556 2 роки тому

    Immediately to something I have no idea magnificent

    • @borttorbbq2556
      @borttorbbq2556 2 роки тому

      Okay scratch that I am familiar with it. But still better understanding is better regardless

  • @marieltribo1971
    @marieltribo1971 2 роки тому

    🥳❤🙏 thank youu

  • @minsuga1015
    @minsuga1015 3 роки тому +1

    Omg thank you soo much may Allah bless you 💜💜

  • @jamesbas5209
    @jamesbas5209 7 років тому +7

    Nevermind. That's the chemical reaction, right?
    I'm just not fully understanding how to balance these equations. I'm going to keep replaying the video.

    • @codieanneedwards
      @codieanneedwards 3 роки тому +1

      Yes I keep replaying too, and I’m still confused

  • @samuelschultz4135
    @samuelschultz4135 2 роки тому

    thank u chemistry jesus

  • @jrposadas2753
    @jrposadas2753 4 роки тому +1

    what does the song at the start of the video say?

    • @ProfessorDaveExplains
      @ProfessorDaveExplains  4 роки тому +4

      "He knows a lot about the science stuff, Professor Dave explains!"

    • @Jnrlionndogg
      @Jnrlionndogg 4 роки тому

      @@ProfessorDaveExplains he realy does reply

    • @Jnrlionndogg
      @Jnrlionndogg 4 роки тому

      @@ProfessorDaveExplains that means he is a true teacher

  • @gabrielmcpherson5756
    @gabrielmcpherson5756 4 роки тому +4

    Professor I still don't understand. Can you please explain more in depth

    • @carultch
      @carultch 2 роки тому +1

      You cannot create or destroy atoms, by ordinary chemical means. You also cannot change the elemental species of any given atom. What we do is tally up each element's atom on each side of the chemical equation, and apply coefficients to the front of each chemical formula, indicating that we need at least that many of that molecule, in order to get a full reaction.
      Consider the burning of octane gasoline in oxygen.
      C8H18 + O2 => CO2 + H2O
      We apply placeholder letters as coefficients to each formula:
      a C8H18 + b O2 => c CO2 + d H2O
      Set up a system of equations to solve for a, b, c, and d. Assume a to equal 1. We'll scale up the coefficients if we get fractional values.
      Carbon: 8*a = c
      Hydrogen: 18*a = 2*d
      Oxygen: 2*b = 2*c + d
      Set a=1, and solve for b, c, and d:
      b=12.5
      c=8
      d=9
      Since we end up with a fractional value for b, this means we need to set a=2, and double each of the remaining coefficients. All the coefficients need to end up as a whole number, so it has a real life significance, since you can't react half of a molecule.
      a = 2
      b = 25
      c = 16
      d = 18
      This means our balanced equation is:
      2 C8H18 + 25 O2 => 16 CO2 + 18 H2O
      In English, this would be read aloud as:
      "Two molecules of octane react with 25 molecules of oxygen gas. The reaction yields 16 molecules of carbon dioxide and 18 molecules of water vapor."

    • @gabrielmcpherson5756
      @gabrielmcpherson5756 2 роки тому

      @@carultch thanks it is s much clearer now.

  • @veryhealthy9962
    @veryhealthy9962 Рік тому

    Ooff..I took a full on 45 mins to understand this. (I am however, not learning from school and using P.Dave entirely to self learn supplemented with physical textbook

  • @LCPHRA-wo4qo
    @LCPHRA-wo4qo Місяць тому

    Saved mee

  • @mehakverma7043
    @mehakverma7043 2 роки тому

    2:13 I cannot take the word "propane" seriously.

  • @frankvandam1655
    @frankvandam1655 3 роки тому

    NaCl shouldn't be referred to as a molecule!

  • @jamesciava05
    @jamesciava05 2 роки тому +5

    thank you Jesus

  • @undefined888
    @undefined888 2 роки тому +1

    Can you call sodium chloride a molecule? Im confused - thought they were ionic bonds

    • @setonix9151
      @setonix9151 2 роки тому

      Uhm is this a joke or your actually wondering. I'm uncertain because of your profile picture.

    • @setonix9151
      @setonix9151 2 роки тому

      I'm assuming you should already know because of your profile picture, but to still answer the question : no. I wouldn't call NaCl a molecule.

    • @undefined888
      @undefined888 2 роки тому

      @@setonix9151 sodium chloride is not a molecule, It is an ionic crystal. We write it as NaCl because they bond together 1:1. I am pretty sure that this video is wrong about that.

    • @undefined888
      @undefined888 2 роки тому

      @@setonix9151 it is a joke lol

    • @setonix9151
      @setonix9151 2 роки тому

      @@undefined888 i did just say I wouldn't call it a molecule
      Edit : and I used NaCl because I'm lazy