The #1 tennis female Williams sister players agreed that they could not play above #300 men's position. They attempted under #200 and were CRUSHED. There are many advantages that men have if gone through complete puberty., larger heart, larger lungs. larger hands, greater stamina, muscle types that women do not have. This all can be found on the internet. See Zuby'a tongue in check video weight lifting. It is disgraceful.
If it’s all the elite athletes who feel like this about this matter why on earth does the IOC endorse it? Who sits on this committee ? 🤦♂️they should be sacked.
How come after 44 years of multiple coming and goings I see a very smart intelligent lady talking so SIMPLE of problems and THE lack of solutions OVER 44YEARS.. MAYBE SHE MIGHT NOT HERE IN 44YEARS TIME TO HEAR THE SAME KIND OF HEARTBREAKING STORYS OF HOW A YOUNG SPORTING ICON FROM MY LIFE.. WENT TO SUPPORT HER AS AN 8 YEAR OLD CHILD AT THE COMMON WEALTH POOL. ITS SHARON DAVIES!! CAUSED A MASS EXTINCTION OF A MAN IN MANY A HOUSEHOLD IN THEM DAYS... WAS ON A BUS GOING TO IT.. SEEN A FEW BLANK SPACES FROM THERE EXPRESSIONS ON THE WAY THERE.. AND TALKING ABOUT HER SPORTING ACHIEVEMENT ON THE WAY HOME.. HOPE SHE WON THAT DAY.. I WAS ONLY 8 TOOK ME A LITTLE LONGER TO SWITCH BACK TO REALITY ❤❤❤
I mentioned that SORE LOSER TAG YESTERDAY... ACCEPTING YOUR A SORE LOSER!!! ONLY MAKES YOU LOSE WITH GRACE.. WELL THATS THE INTENION... A SORE LOSER SHOULD BE HEARD.. AND LISTENED TO.. THEN WATCHED BY BECOMING A FEARLESS WINNER IN MY OPINION ❤❤❤ SHE DONT SOUND LIKE A SORE LOSER.. BUT THE FEARLESS WINNER THAT WOULD NOT AND STILL WILL NOT QUIT!!!
The burden of proof lies with you who want to prohibit trans people from competing in the sex classification they have transitioned to. The current position of the athletics bodies after reviewing the current data is that trans people DO NOT have an undue advantage in competitive sport. So, if you want to change the current rules, it is on you to present data that shows that trans women have an undue advantage. Until then, you can make as many 'opinion videos' as you like, but we don't bow to your prejudiced opinions.
@@ValleyoftheRogue Saying the word 'science' doesn't automatically make your position rational or fact based. It seems you have no actual argument, just your prejudice.
No, the burden of proof is on those trying to enter a sex class where they don’t belong. And there are vast amounts of peer reviewed pieces which speak to bone density, muscle strength advantage etc. etc. etc.
@@abell2756 The conclusion of which is that trans athletes do not have an undue advantage and therefore are allowed to compete. So, your opinion differes from the current reality. So present new data to show that trans women have an undue advantage when competing against cis women, or go cry your salty tears some place else. The burden of proof is on you. Your emotional opinions are not justification enough to limit the freedoms of other human beings.
She has been a hero all my life ❤️ as a swimmer and a feminist 💪🏼
Bravo!!!
If they haven't got an argument they just throw names - yes indeed.
The #1 tennis female Williams sister players agreed that they could not play above #300 men's position. They attempted under #200 and were CRUSHED. There are many advantages that men have if gone through complete puberty., larger heart, larger lungs. larger hands, greater stamina, muscle types that women do not have. This all can be found on the internet. See Zuby'a tongue in check video weight lifting. It is disgraceful.
If it’s all the elite athletes who feel like this about this matter why on earth does the IOC endorse it? Who sits on this committee ? 🤦♂️they should be sacked.
How come after 44 years of multiple coming and goings I see a very smart intelligent lady talking so SIMPLE of problems and THE lack of solutions OVER 44YEARS..
MAYBE SHE MIGHT NOT HERE IN 44YEARS TIME TO HEAR THE SAME KIND OF HEARTBREAKING STORYS OF HOW A YOUNG SPORTING ICON FROM MY LIFE.. WENT TO SUPPORT HER AS AN 8 YEAR OLD CHILD AT THE COMMON WEALTH POOL.
ITS SHARON DAVIES!!
CAUSED A MASS EXTINCTION OF A MAN IN MANY A HOUSEHOLD IN THEM DAYS...
WAS ON A BUS GOING TO IT..
SEEN A FEW BLANK SPACES FROM THERE EXPRESSIONS ON THE WAY THERE..
AND TALKING ABOUT HER SPORTING ACHIEVEMENT ON THE WAY HOME..
HOPE SHE WON THAT DAY..
I WAS ONLY 8
TOOK ME A LITTLE LONGER TO SWITCH BACK TO REALITY
❤❤❤
👏🏾👏🏾👏🏾👏🏾
I mentioned that SORE LOSER TAG YESTERDAY...
ACCEPTING YOUR A SORE LOSER!!!
ONLY MAKES YOU LOSE WITH GRACE..
WELL THATS THE INTENION...
A SORE LOSER SHOULD BE HEARD.. AND LISTENED TO..
THEN WATCHED BY BECOMING A FEARLESS WINNER IN MY OPINION
❤❤❤
SHE DONT SOUND LIKE A SORE LOSER..
BUT THE FEARLESS WINNER THAT WOULD NOT AND STILL WILL NOT QUIT!!!
Women- just say no. Practice after me. NO.
Wasn't she left paralysed recently?
The burden of proof lies with you who want to prohibit trans people from competing in the sex classification they have transitioned to.
The current position of the athletics bodies after reviewing the current data is that trans people DO NOT have an undue advantage in competitive sport.
So, if you want to change the current rules, it is on you to present data that shows that trans women have an undue advantage.
Until then, you can make as many 'opinion videos' as you like, but we don't bow to your prejudiced opinions.
You don't have to be a creationist to deny science and sex differences. Apparently, you deny science.
@@ValleyoftheRogue Saying the word 'science' doesn't automatically make your position rational or fact based.
It seems you have no actual argument, just your prejudice.
No, the burden of proof is on those trying to enter a sex class where they don’t belong. And there are vast amounts of peer reviewed pieces which speak to bone density, muscle strength advantage etc. etc. etc.
@@abell2756 The conclusion of which is that trans athletes do not have an undue advantage and therefore are allowed to compete.
So, your opinion differes from the current reality. So present new data to show that trans women have an undue advantage when competing against cis women, or go cry your salty tears some place else.
The burden of proof is on you.
Your emotional opinions are not justification enough to limit the freedoms of other human beings.
@@SnuggLeona no it doesn’t. Have you missed the World Rugby assessment? There is no peer reviewed study in the world that says there is no advantage.