As someone with a Blog in tech niche, absolutely worst thing about ChatGPT is the amount of factual errors it produces. It takes more time to check all the claims then anything else..
@@ericm425 create a custom GPT then upload related documents about the topic or service. Then it is much more focused and doesn’t make as many things up!
So you're saying that Google can recognize simply the bad framing of an article and put it in the supplementary index or otherwise ignore it? How would it know to do this? I agree it's obvious to a reader, but how would Google recognize it confidently enough to demote the article? I think what's really happening is that bad framing sets up for a weak CGPT article without a nice diverse mix of entities, and without citing anything (just saying generic things) and not including and metrics or basically any quantitative data.
Yep that’s kinda what I was getting at but I see it naturally and you see it scientifically (like google) but we’re saying the same thing. Also the reader is technically the most important so by doing extra formatting, photos, and interesting framing, you’re covering all your bases, and should have much better ranking articles
Yes for sure. I've seen posts with only 1 image not get indexed. The table is a good idea, I need to do that. It's funny I also have a watch affiliate site that has some problems, funny that this video came up!! @@Incomestreamsurfers
Perfect, thank you for summarising and providing an actual example.
Quick tip if you use rank math you can set up instant indexing so it requests indexing every time a post is published or updated
That’s what we’ve done! 👌
too bad Polylang sin't compatible with RankMath
Thanks Hamish - yet again more good stuff
As someone with a Blog in tech niche, absolutely worst thing about ChatGPT is the amount of factual errors it produces.
It takes more time to check all the claims then anything else..
I've fact checked chatgpt. A lot. Pretty sure it was on point. Alot.
Train it, that’s what I’ve been doing. Makes it much more accurate.
How do you do that?
@@ericm425 create a custom GPT then upload related documents about the topic or service. Then it is much more focused and doesn’t make as many things up!
@@drumbassclassics how?
hope you gonna make video about how to make CGPT more accurate
then what is the good framing of blog?
Yeah you’ve made a lot of good points. There were some ChatGPT titles and framing I gotta change that were kinda like this!
So you're saying that Google can recognize simply the bad framing of an article and put it in the supplementary index or otherwise ignore it? How would it know to do this? I agree it's obvious to a reader, but how would Google recognize it confidently enough to demote the article?
I think what's really happening is that bad framing sets up for a weak CGPT article without a nice diverse mix of entities, and without citing anything (just saying generic things) and not including and metrics or basically any quantitative data.
Yep that’s kinda what I was getting at but I see it naturally and you see it scientifically (like google) but we’re saying the same thing.
Also the reader is technically the most important so by doing extra formatting, photos, and interesting framing, you’re covering all your bases, and should have much better ranking articles
Yes for sure. I've seen posts with only 1 image not get indexed. The table is a good idea, I need to do that. It's funny I also have a watch affiliate site that has some problems, funny that this video came up!!
@@Incomestreamsurfers
Hamish, I have a client that sells Rolex, Breitling, Richard MIlle - would this still pertain to these highly searched brands? Thank you!
Oh yes - this is my bread and butter with 2men so, for sure
Thank you! @@Incomestreamsurfers
Yes I know exactly this & I don't write articles that topics on chatgpt suggest to write & always depends on my mind .
urls look over optimized?
well when everybody always wants one prompt that creates them everything, it is not surprising.
Also seo is day by day dying
Lmao
First 🎉