Hey man! Just found your channel a few weeks ago, and I have to say, I'm really impressed with your content. Great production quality, beautiful b-roll, solid pacing, and informative. I wish there were more fpv content creators doing what you're doing. Keep it up!
Excellent video as always, I love the in depth testing and amount of data. These do look pretty awesome, as someone ever paranoid about signal strength and quality, they'd certainly be worth considering.
Iterating results, I always assumed at least better quality with matek and looks it’s the choice as well for longer range on larger builds. The size difference sure does matter on tighter/smaller builds. Great video!
The extra sensitivity isn't translating into higher LQ for the most part so I wonder how much it actually matters for performance. The SNR is remaining the same because it's just the same signal amplified.
I crashed my 3inch and the RX stopped communicating with the TX....It's not a loose connection or solder point issue. The rx simply "gave way".... I'm going to try re-flashing both points with the latest ELRS firmware to see if that resolves the problem.....Any suggestions? Oh btw, it's a R9mm/R9m combo.
Great review! I have been using the EP2s in my Quad builds. Just got a matek one for my Nano Drak build. Good to know they perform a bit better. Cheers
I understand the 'D' in the name of the R24-D stands for diversity. It has two antennae and diversity circuitry so install the antenna at right angles to each other for best reception.I have two of these receivers in quads and can confirm that they work very well in a medium density forest environment.
Ordered the diversity matek and I'm going to put it in my skylite 3.5. Excited to see how the range compares to the radiomaster ep currently installed.
I cannot update my Matek R24D firmware in ExpressLRS configurator "FC Found in COM 6 Connecting......" Then build error I also tried using expresslrs webflasher Cannot detect RX Target, blindly flashing I kept trying using Speedybee App Compilation failed Do you have any sugesstion? I really need your help Thanks
Hi, just found the channel,loved the work you have done ,imo as a nebie i have both ide say youspot on but if it fits easier for a few metres i would just use the smaller but most of my rx purchaces from now on will be matek until somthing better comes out ,not holding my breath but in 4~5 years elrs has done leaps n bounds i hope hd video gets cheaper for us all especially low income so its more enjoyable but yeah.can dream! thanx again
Idk man, I'm building my first plane soon and I'm having a hard time choosing between a matek wing fc and a nice big beefy elrs receiver with fat antennas, or something else like an elrs pwm receiver... both are big and defs have their place in the hobby, and so do the smaller receivers.
Another great video. Please introduce yourself so you can enjoy the notoriety of others in your field. You’re too good at this to not say your name and put a name stripe graphic at the bottom when you do.
Wors test i ever see. Diferent antennas, diferent setups, diferent position of receiwer, diferent positions of antennas. You make a test of your setups sigal strenght. For recever test you have tu use same drone, same position of antenna, same antena, same position of receiver.
Lot's of detail here man! Very well planned, executed, and delivered in terms of meaningful testing. Keep up the good work 💪
Thanks Wez! And thanks again for providing your insight on these receivers.
Your the man, I love your long range reviews. Thank you.
@@Camilookb me too, especialy the last onexo!
Another great review! Thanks for following up on the Matek comparison, you backed my gut feel with Matek with real data 😁
Hey man! Just found your channel a few weeks ago, and I have to say, I'm really impressed with your content. Great production quality, beautiful b-roll, solid pacing, and informative. I wish there were more fpv content creators doing what you're doing. Keep it up!
Thanks! I’m glad you like the videos!
Great quality and information as always keep it up man
wow lots of clear and concise information....thank you Sr.
Excellent video as always, I love the in depth testing and amount of data. These do look pretty awesome, as someone ever paranoid about signal strength and quality, they'd certainly be worth considering.
Another great vídeo mate. Love the detail and depth of information. Keep up the good work.
Iterating results, I always assumed at least better quality with matek and looks it’s the choice as well for longer range on larger builds. The size difference sure does matter on tighter/smaller builds. Great video!
The extra sensitivity isn't translating into higher LQ for the most part so I wonder how much it actually matters for performance. The SNR is remaining the same because it's just the same signal amplified.
I crashed my 3inch and the RX stopped communicating with the TX....It's not a loose connection or solder point issue. The rx simply "gave way".... I'm going to try re-flashing both points with the latest ELRS firmware to see if that resolves the problem.....Any suggestions? Oh btw, it's a R9mm/R9m combo.
Great review! I have been using the EP2s in my Quad builds. Just got a matek one for my Nano Drak build. Good to know they perform a bit better. Cheers
I understand the 'D' in the name of the R24-D stands for diversity. It has two antennae and diversity circuitry so install the antenna at right angles to each other for best reception.I have two of these receivers in quads and can confirm that they work very well in a medium density forest environment.
Ordered the diversity matek and I'm going to put it in my skylite 3.5. Excited to see how the range compares to the radiomaster ep currently installed.
Excellent info and great presentation! Nice job
I cannot update my Matek R24D firmware in ExpressLRS configurator
"FC Found in COM 6
Connecting......"
Then build error
I also tried using expresslrs webflasher
Cannot detect RX Target, blindly flashing
I kept trying using Speedybee App
Compilation failed
Do you have any sugesstion?
I really need your help
Thanks
how you manage to get almost no glare from your glasses is impressive as someone who has spend hours trying to set up to get rid of the glare
Haha. I use a 36” softbox up and to the right from the camera’s perspective. It’s all about the angles
These are too large for my taste, there exist now some small elrs rx's with LNA's, will they perform simmilarly?
INCREDIBLY USEFUL VIDEO, JUST WHAT I WAS LOOKING FOR. A COMPARISON IN AN URBAN ENVIRONMENT. ALL THE FACTS WITHOUT FURTHER ADO
Range comparison? Would be great to see!
Hi, just found the channel,loved the work you have done ,imo as a nebie i have both ide say youspot on but if it fits easier for a few metres i would just use the smaller but most of my rx purchaces from now on will be matek until somthing better comes out ,not holding my breath but in 4~5 years elrs has done leaps n bounds i hope hd video gets cheaper for us all especially low income so its more enjoyable but yeah.can dream! thanx again
Great video subbed.
I like to fly LR. I'd like to find a LR comparison :D
I like your methodology 🙂👏
nice work
Idk man, I'm building my first plane soon and I'm having a hard time choosing between a matek wing fc and a nice big beefy elrs receiver with fat antennas, or something else like an elrs pwm receiver... both are big and defs have their place in the hobby, and so do the smaller receivers.
I have built about 50 or 60 quads by now
And soon something a bit bigger than a m600, very similar, just bigger
Very very great job.
Hello, I thought the PA on the Matek was only for telemetry.
There is a PA for the telemetry radio and a LNA for the receiver circuit. Both chips amplify the respective signals.
Another great video. Please introduce yourself so you can enjoy the notoriety of others in your field. You’re too good at this to not say your name and put a name stripe graphic at the bottom when you do.
Haha too late .. I bought happy model ep2 😩
That’s still my most-used receiver. Hard to beat the performance for its size, weight, and price.
@@ATXAirborne hahaha ya its a deal with that price and size
More space
less noise on receiver!!!
Wors test i ever see. Diferent antennas, diferent setups, diferent position of receiwer, diferent positions of antennas. You make a test of your setups sigal strenght. For recever test you have tu use same drone, same position of antenna, same antena, same position of receiver.
Feel free to do a better test and make a video about it! I’m sure others would find it useful.
I have a dead EP1 and a dead EP2 and i am not rich enough to by this sheep crap.
Only Matek if possible.