Join this channel to get access to perks: / @powercertanimatedvideos This is an animated video showing the difference between 32 bit and 64 bit computing.
Here is the RAM that I recommend and use in my current PC: (affiliate) amzn.to/2KqHGwQ Join this channel to get access to perks: ua-cam.com/channels/JQJ4GjTiq5lmn8czf8oo0Q.htmljoin
All computers are different, your ram may not be suitable for other computer systems, so you are tricking people into buying shit ram, that their system might not work with.
@@MarkNorville how's that shit ram? All you need is 3000+ MHz and atleast 2x8gb sticks. It's also cl15 which is faster than normal cl16 ram. Maybe get educated so you don't look stupid.
@@hellomine2849 I'm just goofin, but in all seriousness the only form of chromium I'd even remotely consider using is the ungoogled version. Google is creepy.
No heavy intro; No quirky sound background or manner of speaking. Just a pleasant well articulated vocal explanation and expedient video presentation with minimal time of presentation. Just perfect!! Thanks!
@@jhgcup9223 like I said... unless you want to play newest games... I have 2 GB and for office work it is more than enough. If you are a gamer, you sure need a lot of RAM.
I thought the quote was: "640K should be enough for anybody". I think that was so the personal computers they were designing could use the address space above 640K for display access. The first computer I looked after had 24K (24 X 1024) characters of memory. (a character of memory was 6 bits)
@@OldDogNewTrick I bet you're right; I just knew it was something incredibly short-sighted for someone in tech to say. Thanks for straightening that out.
I agree. A bigger problem is - when will that amount RAM be produced and available for consumer. What will be the physical size of the chip and the power required to use the memory. I think there is going to be cooling challenges to overcome.
No, it does not happen always. “We will never need Graham’s Number of bytes in RAM”. 640k limit was easy for me, stupid kid, to prove bad. I knew a proper book would not fit in RAM at once. That limit was ridiculous. Not everybody thought “nobody would ever need that much”.
It is not correct that 32 bits computers cannot handle more than 4 GB. It can, in fact, I have had 8 GBs into a 32 bits Operative system. There is something called PAE (physical address extention).....
Being a visual learner, all your videos has been extremely useful to my learning and understanding. Thank you for your contribution. Looking forward to more animated videos. How about OSI model, SNMP, NTP etc? Many Thanks.
@K B It was said, at one time; "64K was more than anyone will ever need." If back then you had suggested 4G, they'd put you in Bellevue, yet here we are.... So it's just a matter time imo
0:27 4gb is maximum ram only in *windows* 32bit! In 32bit *Linux or other UNIX-like os* you can have more than 4gb of ram - i installed linux (32bit linuxmint 18.2) on laptop with 8gb of ram, and Linux 32bit can handle more than 4gb memory!
this is sort of correct.. if you are talking about the accessto ram being 32 bit or 64 bit... but a 32 bit micro processor could have 36, 40, all kinds of access to memory addresses.. a 64 bit processor refers to its instructions and data path... not necessarily the amount of memory it can address.
It's either the data bus width or register width. Address bus is all over the place, the Motorola 68000 had a 32bit register file with 24bit address bus and a 16 bit data bus, no one referred to it as a 24bit processor.
Exactly.. 64 bit processors don't necessarily run faster than a 32bit processor. A processor is called 64 bit when the general purpose registers are 64 bit wide. It's not about the data/address bus. Most 32bit x86 processors from intel used to have 36bit or 40bit physical addressing. The only problem with 32bit processors is when loading large applications that need more than 4gb memory to address, which is very rare in desktop or mobile computers. There are however some applications that are either multimedia or scientific in nature and are tuned for using 64bit registers and those applications run marginally faster on a 64bit processor than a 32bit processor
@@Yusufyusuf-lh3dw Also gets complicated there, many "32 bit" processors had 64/128 bit ALUs/SIMD operations. The PS2 CPU is an example of one of those.
@@SerBallister I said 64 bit "general purpose registers". SIMD registers could be 64bit or higher. It's the general purpose registers that matter. For example when you enable 64bit mode on an Intel processor, your general purpose registers become 64 bit wide. Your eax, ebx, ecx etc. Becomes rax, rbx, rcx etc. Coming back to the performance gain, you don't get any performance gain by switching to 64bit mode except under few conditions where you need to do 64bit arithmetic and your software and libraries are modified to handle this.
you might not show yourself on your videos like other tech youtubers who have more than 1 million subs, but you are explaining things extremely better than them. very on point and efficient. i really like that.
The problem is that almost the entire video is wrong. A 64 bit system has a bus 64 wires wide. It can't access 16 exabytes of data. It can only access 64 bits at once. He also did the math wrong. He kept saying 64 byte computer, and used bytes in his calculation. Bytes are 8x larger than bits. He got the 16 exabytes of data from 2^64, but that is wrong, as that is the total combination of data through all 64 address lines. If you actually want to learn the difference go watch techquickie's video on it.
The one thing that wasn't mentioned was the CPU and it's 32 bit & 64 bit difference, which can lead people to see ( as you did with the cpu images) , that they are no different, and that the only difference is the amount of memory.
These are the best videos, to use to have complicated concepts explained in a clear, easy to understand manner, thank you for creating them. Keep up the good work, my brain thanks you.
But, the Intel Pentium Pro from 1996 was a 32 bit CPU but had 36 bit memory (RAM) addressing, allowing it to be a 32 bit CPU that could address 64 GB RAM. The catch there being that the Operating System (OS) must be "PAE" aware (Physical Address Extensions). Also, the Intel 8086 was 16 bit yet had 20 bit memory addressing so it could utilize 1 MB RAM, and the 80286 was also 16 bit but with 24 bit memory addressing for 16 MB RAM. If you go further back, the Intel 8080/8085 were 8 bit CPUs that had 16 bit memory addressing to allow access to 64 KB RAM. The "bit-depth" of the processor doesn't necessarily determine the amount of RAM the system can address, but the addressing bit-depth does.
A 64 bit computer can not access 16 exabytes at once. The bus (essentially what connects the ram and cpu together) only consists of 64 wires, which make it 64 bit computer. So it can only access 64 bits of data at once (but 2.6 billion times per second). But the total possibilities of all the data is 2^64 through all 64 wires. So he was just using the wrong number to show the wrong thing.
Very much like the guy in the 1800s who was in charge of the US Patent Office. He stated, with confidence "Everything that can be invented and patented has been invented and patented!"
I have to say honestly, your videos are so amazing, you can making stuff like this so much easier top understand, before this video I had watched several videos and still couldn't quite understand, but I watched your video one time and already got the gist of it. Thank you so much for these wonderful videos!
The information provided in this video is completely wrong. when we say 64 bit vs 32 bit it means that the size of internal registers in the processor is 64 bit or 32 bit. Of course, bigger registers make the calculations faster. There is nothing about addressing the memory as we can easily expand the memory address size by using segment registers.
It's also a good thing to point out that 32-bit (x86) software is starting to become redundant. A lot of software these days will mainly support only 64-bit (x64) systems.
0:45 "We would never need to use that amount of memory" Gamers in 2077: 512 exabyte ram in my 128 bit brain computer isn't enough. Also gonna grab the LTX 30090 TI with 64 Exabyte Vram
I was thinking the same thing, specifically back when they originally said; "64K is plenty, nobody will ever need more than that." When you look up "fail" in the dictionary it refers to that statement. Kidding, but it should... They're learning the lesson tho, like IPv6 is IPv4 squared since v4 was, at one time, "more than we'll ever need." So now I wonder how long b4 v6 is all used up, along with 64bit mem. Can't fathom it now of course, but at least we're aware that it will no doubt happen.
for example a intel 286 can address much more than 64k, even though it is a 16 bit microprocessor. the processor in a old commodore 64 is only an 8 bit processor, but it can access 64k of memory..
Thank you very much for doing such a video ! Never was I explained that clear the difference between 32 and 64 ! I liked because the video was not "technical". Keep up the excellent work and may God bless you always !
"that number is so huge that it's virtually unlimited because we will never need to use that amount of memory" - just wait for neuron computers becoming popular and games with huge AI system in a decade. xD Years ago people were using a computers with 32 MB RAM and they didn't see need to use more. But need comes by itself. And same here, a need for exabytes will come soon too.
Howdy. The clip only describes memory addressing. Also the data bus is more powerful. One CPU cycle can process the double amount of bits in a 64 bit system than it can in a 32 bit system. Regards.
3 роки тому+1
soo, what is your suggestion for more performance: on a laptop with 4 gb ram support limit, should we prefer to install the 32 bit or the 64 bit version of windows7 ? any idea?
@ Howdy. With those limits it seems to me there is not much difference. Theoretically 64 bit should be faster but the cache memory would get full more often slowing performance. I can oly adive to try both and see which feels better. Regards.
3 роки тому
@@eugenepohjola258 thank you for your advice, with greetings
@ Howdy mate. You might want to try manually configuring virtual memory to say twice the RAM. That should save some resources as windows does'nt have to recompute it all the time. Also you may configure windows to only use basic graphics that looks like win2000 and only to use basic colours. Regards.
3 роки тому
@@eugenepohjola258 yes, thank you for your great hints
This is misleading and talks about 32 and 64bit "address bus" only. The main performance difference in bit size of a CPU is it's internal registers and processing architecture. Some computer systems, such as old x86 based PCs, have differing bit sizes between the address bus and registers. They have to utilise two registers and perform internal bit shifting to populate the bus accordingly.
I know this is 4 years late, but for those viewing the video now. Another difference between 64 and 32 bit CPU architecture is the "WORD size". "Word size" refers to the number of bits processed by a computer's CPU in one go. These days, typically 32 bits (4 bytes) for 32 bit CPUs or 64 bits(8 byte) CPUs. Which means if 2 CPUs that are exactly the same specs in every way (Hertz, cache, etc.) except one is 32-bit and one is 64-bit, the 64-bit CPU will be virtually twice as fast as the 32-bit CPU.
Let's do some math to see how we got these numbers. - A binary digit or bit has two possible values: 0 or 1. - There are 8 bits in a byte, so one single byte has 2 ^ 8 or 256 possible values. - On a 32-bit operating system, memory is allocated in 4-byte addresses (without using Physical Address Extension voodoo). That means there are 256 ^ 4 or 4,294,967,296 possible addresses. This is why there's no point in installing more than 4GB of RAM on a 32-bit OS computer. - On a 64-bit operating system, memory is allocated in 8-byte addresses. That means there are 256 ^ 8 or 18,446,744,073,709,551,616 possible addresses. Thus, 64-bit OS machines support up to 18.4 exabytes of RAM. However, the 32 or 64 in a 32/64-bit OS actually refers to the size of the data bus - the amount of data that the CPU can process in one clock cycle - not the memory addressing scheme.
Here is the RAM that I recommend and use in my current PC: (affiliate) amzn.to/2KqHGwQ
Join this channel to get access to perks:
ua-cam.com/channels/JQJ4GjTiq5lmn8czf8oo0Q.htmljoin
All computers are different, your ram may not be suitable for other computer systems, so you are tricking people into buying shit ram, that their system might not work with.
32 bit system more faster than 64 bit becous see binary...
dont make money make knowledge....over the world....
@@imranabbasshaikh121 Why only you should make money and others should remain poor? That is muslim mentality?
@@MarkNorville how's that shit ram? All you need is 3000+ MHz and atleast 2x8gb sticks. It's also cl15 which is faster than normal cl16 ram. Maybe get educated so you don't look stupid.
What software do you use to animate your videos?
"we would never require that much of a memory"
Chrome: 'let me do the honours!'
Chrome is like hold my beer :D :D :D
me who switched to edge a day before :)
@@adarsh1184 Ew you may as well use internet explorer 🌚🤣
@@BeinIan Edge is chromium based now.
@@hellomine2849 I'm just goofin, but in all seriousness the only form of chromium I'd even remotely consider using is the ungoogled version. Google is creepy.
this is way more clear than the most clearest thing in the world thx
Thanks :)
PowerCert Animated Videos i have learned so much from your channel than from most of my teacher at school
Glad to help, thanks!
Yeah!
Maybe the clearest thing in the world isn't thar clear at all, huh?
No heavy intro; No quirky sound background or manner of speaking. Just a pleasant well articulated vocal explanation and expedient video presentation with minimal time of presentation. Just perfect!! Thanks!
00:48 "We will never need to use that amount..." Fast forward 30 years: "16 Exabytes blows it's so damn slow!"
Hope we will have simpler systems by then as the way in which things are getting heavier with every new generation will become unsustainable.
quantum ram?
RAM: Exists
Chrome: I'll take the entire stock
u jst dun didz da maymayz🤤
" We will never need that much memory"
Fallout 4 has detected 16 Exabytes of RAM
Fallout has crashed due to insufficient memory
LOL
@@mari2. well, 4 GB is enough, unless you want to play the newest games at maximum details. For basic office work even 2 GB i enough.
@@wildviper883 bruh.
@@wildviper883 how is 4gb of ram enough when some games have a min of 16gb and a recommended of 32gb
@@jhgcup9223 like I said... unless you want to play newest games... I have 2 GB and for office work it is more than enough. If you are a gamer, you sure need a lot of RAM.
Re: 64 bit: "we will never need to use that much memory." Isn't that what Bill Gates said about 256Kb at one time?
I thought the quote was: "640K should be enough for anybody". I think that was so the personal computers they were designing could use the address space above 640K for display access. The first computer I looked after had 24K (24 X 1024) characters of memory. (a character of memory was 6 bits)
@@OldDogNewTrick I bet you're right; I just knew it was something incredibly short-sighted for someone in tech to say. Thanks for straightening that out.
@Qeycon What would be the difference when going to 128bit?
Except he never said that. So many fake citations flowing around the internet
@Qeycon MUCH more than twice actually. (According to formula in the video)
"We will never need that amount of memory"
Chrome: Hold my beer
Hold my tabs*
Firefox..... hold my tappas!
Steam actually use more than Chrome now. It's beyond retarded how dumb Valve programmers are.
@@vBDKv made my RAM look like sink into quicksand
😁
Animators like you make learning IT so much easier than before.
0:45 dude, never, EVER, say we will never use that much of anything when it comes to computing. History has proven that wrong every time.
I agree. A bigger problem is - when will that amount RAM be produced and available for consumer. What will be the physical size of the chip and the power required to use the memory. I think there is going to be cooling challenges to overcome.
No, it does not happen always.
“We will never need Graham’s Number of bytes in RAM”.
640k limit was easy for me, stupid kid, to prove bad. I knew a proper book would not fit in RAM at once. That limit was ridiculous. Not everybody thought “nobody would ever need that much”.
Indeed, we are already at 8gb average ram usage... which is like one of billionth away from exceeding the limit.
If we have a main memory that has 16 exabytes capacity, i think we wont need a hard drive at all and just store every single program as a process
@@Zino______o and loose it after every rebooting
Dude, idk why i'm finding out about this channel just now, but i can't stop watchin' the vids xD
Google Chrome: *Did anybody say RAM?*
I have 7 tabs opened right now and it's sitting at around 800MB. What's the problem?
Ali107 says who? 1.5 gigs is nothing these days.
More likely Mozilla Firefox.
4 TB of RAM for more than 2 tab chrome 😂😂
@@fullmetaljacket7 u must be a very bg person lol
"we would never require that much of a memory"
Linus tech tips: lets see how many chrome tabs can we open with ONE Terabytes of memory
and a 64 bit cpu can address 16 exabytes of memory, which is 16,000,000 times more than one terabyte of memory
It is not correct that 32 bits computers cannot handle more than 4 GB. It can, in fact, I have had 8 GBs into a 32 bits Operative system. There is something called PAE (physical address extention).....
"We will never need that much memory"
Seems like someone hasn't learned from Bill Gates.
underappreciated comment.
It turns out that we indeed do.
For real, never stop making your videos. They are incredibly helpful.
Thanks
This guy explains so nicely that even the most complicated matter becomes the simplest.
Being a visual learner, all your videos has been extremely useful to my learning and understanding. Thank you for your contribution. Looking forward to more animated videos. How about OSI model, SNMP, NTP etc? Many Thanks.
I never thought that there is such a jump from 32 bit to 64. Man that's fascinating.
This is what makes me wanting to upgrade into Windows 11. I read Windows 11 is 64 bit only.
Uh huh. That's what they said when they created 32 bit systems. Who is going to need 4GB of memory, that's insane!?
Really..???
@K B It was said, at one time; "64K was more than anyone will ever need." If back then you had suggested 4G, they'd put you in Bellevue, yet here we are.... So it's just a matter time imo
@@chevota400 not 64k, but 640k :)
Exactly and now... Buying 16GB DDR4 Ram is a common occurrence among gamers
and 4GB is considered SHIT
dude i have 4gb ram and i sooo wanna upgrade it
0:27 4gb is maximum ram only in *windows* 32bit! In 32bit *Linux or other UNIX-like os* you can have more than 4gb of ram - i installed linux (32bit linuxmint 18.2) on laptop with 8gb of ram, and Linux 32bit can handle more than 4gb memory!
Thats what you call teaching. Direct to the point. Not showing off with technical stuff.
this is sort of correct.. if you are talking about the accessto ram being 32 bit or 64 bit... but a 32 bit micro processor could have 36, 40, all kinds of access to memory addresses.. a 64 bit processor refers to its instructions and data path... not necessarily the amount of memory it can address.
It's either the data bus width or register width. Address bus is all over the place, the Motorola 68000 had a 32bit register file with 24bit address bus and a 16 bit data bus, no one referred to it as a 24bit processor.
Exactly.. 64 bit processors don't necessarily run faster than a 32bit processor. A processor is called 64 bit when the general purpose registers are 64 bit wide. It's not about the data/address bus. Most 32bit x86 processors from intel used to have 36bit or 40bit physical addressing. The only problem with 32bit processors is when loading large applications that need more than 4gb memory to address, which is very rare in desktop or mobile computers. There are however some applications that are either multimedia or scientific in nature and are tuned for using 64bit registers and those applications run marginally faster on a 64bit processor than a 32bit processor
@@Yusufyusuf-lh3dw Also gets complicated there, many "32 bit" processors had 64/128 bit ALUs/SIMD operations. The PS2 CPU is an example of one of those.
@@SerBallister I said 64 bit "general purpose registers". SIMD registers could be 64bit or higher. It's the general purpose registers that matter. For example when you enable 64bit mode on an Intel processor, your general purpose registers become 64 bit wide. Your eax, ebx, ecx etc. Becomes rax, rbx, rcx etc. Coming back to the performance gain, you don't get any performance gain by switching to 64bit mode except under few conditions where you need to do 64bit arithmetic and your software and libraries are modified to handle this.
@@Yusufyusuf-lh3dw I'm agreeing with you. It could be argued 64bit general processing is slower because of higher cache demand
you might not show yourself on your videos like other tech youtubers who have more than 1 million subs, but you are explaining things extremely better than them. very on point and efficient. i really like that.
The problem is that almost the entire video is wrong. A 64 bit system has a bus 64 wires wide. It can't access 16 exabytes of data. It can only access 64 bits at once. He also did the math wrong. He kept saying 64 byte computer, and used bytes in his calculation. Bytes are 8x larger than bits. He got the 16 exabytes of data from 2^64, but that is wrong, as that is the total combination of data through all 64 address lines. If you actually want to learn the difference go watch techquickie's video on it.
1996: we will never need that much RAM
2019: hold my beer
The one thing that wasn't mentioned was the CPU and it's 32 bit & 64 bit difference, which can lead people to see ( as you did with the cpu images) , that they are no different, and that the only difference is the amount of memory.
*Puts more ram on pc*
Google Chrome : What a nice new rams you got there... :)))))
2020: "We will never need more than 16 Exabytes of memory"
2120: Why is this company selling 256 bit systems still???
even with 64bit, it's still not enough ram for google chrome lol
That's cause your RAM is still too small. Time for an upgrade bro
Google chrome tab each takes ~400MB, what gives?
@@awekeningbro1207 no its take about 300mb
Download more RAM, what's the big deal.
@@awekeningbro1207 Not even close. I have 7 tabs opened right now, sitting at around 800MB.
These are the best videos, to use to have complicated concepts explained in a clear, easy to understand manner, thank you for creating them. Keep up the good work, my brain thanks you.
Glad you like them!
we would never require that much of a memory...
Chrome: I took that personally
But, the Intel Pentium Pro from 1996 was a 32 bit CPU but had 36 bit memory (RAM) addressing, allowing it to be a 32 bit CPU that could address 64 GB RAM. The catch there being that the Operating System (OS) must be "PAE" aware (Physical Address Extensions). Also, the Intel 8086 was 16 bit yet had 20 bit memory addressing so it could utilize 1 MB RAM, and the 80286 was also 16 bit but with 24 bit memory addressing for 16 MB RAM. If you go further back, the Intel 8080/8085 were 8 bit CPUs that had 16 bit memory addressing to allow access to 64 KB RAM. The "bit-depth" of the processor doesn't necessarily determine the amount of RAM the system can address, but the addressing bit-depth does.
Never say never. Remember Bill Gates after building MS-DOS, he said we will never need more than 640k memory.
36 years of my life without knowing the details of this. Thanks man.
Now 40 with a wrong information
A 64 bit computer can not access 16 exabytes at once. The bus (essentially what connects the ram and cpu together) only consists of 64 wires, which make it 64 bit computer. So it can only access 64 bits of data at once (but 2.6 billion times per second). But the total possibilities of all the data is 2^64 through all 64 wires. So he was just using the wrong number to show the wrong thing.
very useful information with high quality animation and narration
2020-:We will never need 16 exabyte of ram
1990-: we will never need more then 4 mb of Ram.
10 more years and Chrome will use upto 5 exabyte ...
Fantastic way to learn something i never have pay attention Thanks
Glad to hear that!
Very much like the guy in the 1800s who was in charge of the US Patent Office. He stated, with confidence "Everything that can be invented and patented has been invented and patented!"
I have to say honestly, your videos are so amazing, you can making stuff like this so much easier top understand, before this video I had watched several videos and still couldn't quite understand, but I watched your video one time and already got the gist of it. Thank you so much for these wonderful videos!
How much memory was needed to create an algorithm of UA-cam for making a 3 years old random video appeared in our recommended list ?
Graphical presentation is much better then reading text. Thanks for this video.
OMG I LOVE THIS CHANNEL !!
why didnt i find this channel 3 years ago, made my life so easy! Thank you!
Wow! So simple to grasp!
Thanks!
The best explanation i have ever seen on you tube when it comes to computers,well done!
The information provided in this video is completely wrong. when we say 64 bit vs 32 bit it means that the size of internal registers in the processor is 64 bit or 32 bit. Of course, bigger registers make the calculations faster. There is nothing about addressing the memory as we can easily expand the memory address size by using segment registers.
It's also a good thing to point out that 32-bit (x86) software is starting to become redundant. A lot of software these days will mainly support only 64-bit (x64) systems.
Most Helpful Videos Ever! Easy, quick, and simple!
Thanks :)
I watched so many of ur videos...so clear and beautifully explained. Thank you.
So nice of you
0:44
Cyberpunk 2077: My time has come
As always, very well explained!
That number is so huge that is virtually unlimited..
Chrome: Hold my tabs....!
Firefox is more ram hungry and slower.
@@kennywhiddon1497 For me not. its weird. Both in my laptop and Desktop PC Firefox is fast while Chrome takes a lot to start and hogs ram.
@@Dragonfire511 It's the opposite for me on 3 laptops and 2 desktops. It does not matter if it is on Windows or Linux.
@@kennywhiddon1497 oh weird thing. its like chrome hates me. even on mobile it goes slow and memory hog for me haha
many thanks for the good work to teach people freely !
Where has this channel beeen ? ! 🧐🇬🇧❤️❤️❤️🤔🤔🤔🤝🤝🤝😀🤯😀
short and right to the point without breaks introducing 20 sponsors. Nice one!
I LOVE YOUR VIDEOS!!!
after using computer and phones for 15 years, finally i got a clear vision about RAM , bit issues . Thanks.
0:45 "We would never need to use that amount of memory"
Gamers in 2077: 512 exabyte ram in my 128 bit brain computer isn't enough. Also gonna grab the LTX 30090 TI with 64 Exabyte Vram
Computer: How Much RAM do you want to use?
Chrome: Yes
0:49 Maybe in my lifetime, but I'm sure at some point in the next 100 years, 16 Exabytes wont be enough.
im sure they said the same thing about 4 gigs
I thank you very much for the animated videos you have made. These are all great job. Thank you so much.
Thank you.
Your vedios are super. Please make some others
I just got this as a recommendation and immediately I wanted to see more of your videos, excellent explanation.
Never say never. Did you remember Microsoft said that and here we're with a terabyte gigabyte harddrive memory
The Matrix: Hold my beer.
Love the way you explain each and everything keep making quality videos like this.
"we will never need 16 exabytes"
Future Windows: "oh yea, hold my bear"
I was thinking the same thing, specifically back when they originally said; "64K is plenty, nobody will ever need more than that." When you look up "fail" in the dictionary it refers to that statement. Kidding, but it should...
They're learning the lesson tho, like IPv6 is IPv4 squared since v4 was, at one time, "more than we'll ever need." So now I wonder how long b4 v6 is all used up, along with 64bit mem. Can't fathom it now of course, but at least we're aware that it will no doubt happen.
@@chevota400 it will be a long time
The best explanation I've heard, thank you.
00:50
I'm from 2399. I'm using a 16 EB computer for uploading my brain.
That's super low I even use 512EB as my school laptop
Short and sweet straight to the point I loved it
You: We will never need to use 16 Exabytes of memory
Google Chrome: *laughing*
for example a intel 286 can address much more than 64k, even though it is a 16 bit microprocessor. the processor in a old commodore 64 is only an 8 bit processor, but it can access 64k of memory..
yes it is faster , but with at least 16-32 gigs of ram
I really enjoy the animation. I just finished and A+ class and your videos are helping clarify some topics. Thanks!
Thank you!
@@PowerCertAnimatedVideos how do u animate this stuff
32 bit yeah I'm broke asf
This video is more clear than my future!... Keep it up mate
38 of 32bit users disliked this video
dislikeSmashers.stupid=true;
Thank you very much for doing such a video !
Never was I explained that clear the difference between 32 and 64 !
I liked because the video was not "technical".
Keep up the excellent work and may God bless you always !
"that number is so huge that it's virtually unlimited because we will never need to use that amount of memory" - just wait for neuron computers becoming popular and games with huge AI system in a decade. xD Years ago people were using a computers with 32 MB RAM and they didn't see need to use more. But need comes by itself. And same here, a need for exabytes will come soon too.
@@PaladinErik That's because we are reaching limits of the current technology, so it slows down. The pressure to develop a new one rises every year.
Wow, so clear with extra visuals
Watching it on my 64 bit OS with 2 GB of ram. (༎ຶ ෴ ༎ຶ)
@RectalDiscourse Windows 7 home basic.
I can bet no college professor can ever explain any concept as clear as you
The unfortunate thing is that this video is very very wrong. That's why its so simple; its just plain incorrect.
i have a 48 bit computer
billy bob you must came from another planet
i installed window 10 64bit twice and bought 2 64bit motherboard, 2 64bit CPUs, i can have have 340282370000000 yottabyte of ram
Congratulations
People really got worked up on that "we won't need that much" remark.
Short sweet and straight to the Point beautiful
What a great explanation
I never thought someone could teach so good :O
You are excellent keep going and thank you for the good explanations :D
Thanks, for your awesome animated video,
we appreciate that
cant thank enough for his work... just awesome
Howdy.
The clip only describes memory addressing. Also the data bus is more powerful. One CPU cycle can process the double amount of bits in a 64 bit system than it can in a 32 bit system.
Regards.
soo, what is your suggestion for more performance:
on a laptop with 4 gb ram support limit, should we prefer to install the 32 bit or the 64 bit version of windows7 ? any idea?
@ Howdy.
With those limits it seems to me there is not much difference. Theoretically 64 bit should be faster but the cache memory would get full more often slowing performance. I can oly adive to try both and see which feels better.
Regards.
@@eugenepohjola258 thank you for your advice, with greetings
@ Howdy mate.
You might want to try manually configuring virtual memory to say twice the RAM. That should save some resources as windows does'nt have to recompute it all the time.
Also you may configure windows to only use basic graphics that looks like win2000 and only to use basic colours.
Regards.
@@eugenepohjola258 yes, thank you for your great hints
This is misleading and talks about 32 and 64bit "address bus" only. The main performance difference in bit size of a CPU is it's internal registers and processing architecture. Some computer systems, such as old x86 based PCs, have differing bit sizes between the address bus and registers. They have to utilise two registers and perform internal bit shifting to populate the bus accordingly.
Very clear and concise in content.
I know this is 4 years late, but for those viewing the video now. Another difference between 64 and 32 bit CPU architecture is the "WORD size". "Word size" refers to the number of bits processed by a computer's CPU in one go. These days, typically 32 bits (4 bytes) for 32 bit CPUs or 64 bits(8 byte) CPUs. Which means if 2 CPUs that are exactly the same specs in every way (Hertz, cache, etc.) except one is 32-bit and one is 64-bit, the 64-bit CPU will be virtually twice as fast as the 32-bit CPU.
Let's do some math to see how we got these numbers.
- A binary digit or bit has two possible values: 0 or 1.
- There are 8 bits in a byte, so one single byte has 2 ^ 8 or 256 possible values.
- On a 32-bit operating system, memory is allocated in 4-byte addresses (without using Physical Address Extension voodoo). That means there are 256 ^ 4 or 4,294,967,296 possible addresses. This is why there's no point in installing more than 4GB of RAM on a 32-bit OS computer.
- On a 64-bit operating system, memory is allocated in 8-byte addresses. That means there are 256 ^ 8 or 18,446,744,073,709,551,616 possible addresses. Thus, 64-bit OS machines support up to 18.4 exabytes of RAM.
However, the 32 or 64 in a 32/64-bit OS actually refers to the size of the data bus - the amount of data that the CPU can process in one clock cycle - not the memory addressing scheme.
Excellent explanatory animated video.Thanks.
64 bit, 32 bit, 16 bit, 8 bit, 4 bit, 2 bit, half bit, quarter bit, THE WRIST GAME
This video was AWESOME thank you
Great explanation! I now understand the difference. Thanks.
Well explained u nailed it we want more of that explain video's