Not when the engine is stressed member, one of the reasons why Aston Martin's AMR1 failed, Inline 6's are TERRIBLE as structural members, so for this application, a V6 would be better.
Not in this application. They wanted to get the weight of the engine as far back and as low to the ground as possible. An in-line 6 is much longer, so the weight of it would negatively affect how the car handles
The paintjob is absolutely amazing !!
No words describes this one day we will buy this car for 5 millions
5:09 I need a girl that looks at a 190 EVO with a smile like that
And they will sell it for over $1 million 🤣🤣
Easily and owner will sell it with. Aprofit thats the way it works 😎
Cool car, but almost as much as a EVO II
Twice as much as evo 2
I6 > V6
Not when the engine is stressed member, one of the reasons why Aston Martin's AMR1 failed, Inline 6's are TERRIBLE as structural members, so for this application, a V6 would be better.
Not in this application. They wanted to get the weight of the engine as far back and as low to the ground as possible. An in-line 6 is much longer, so the weight of it would negatively affect how the car handles
@@trevorrose4529 Specially the CoG of the car, a smaller longitudinal package means better weight distribution, therefore a lower CoG.