Just the fact that a tentative exploratory video like this is being made is INSANE. We live in a World where we need to start considering the impact of the fact that humanoid robots might be living amongst us within our current decade. It's like the science fiction I watched as a child.
Exciting with humanoid robots. I for one will outsource lots of tedious tasks to the robots. In the long run as Ray Kurzweil has predicted products and services will become dirt cheap, and then instead of a job-based economy we will have more of an attention-based economy. People and organizations will still compete for user attention, even when the profit incentive in monetary terms is removed.
Medically speaking, it feels like we’re not dreaming big enough or pushing far enough into the future. While the idea of robots replacing doctors seems plausible, the real potential lies beyond simply replicating human tasks with greater speed or precision. Instead, we should envision entirely new approaches to medicine-such as robotic systems operating at a microscopic or internal scale. These robots could revolutionize procedures by performing tasks from the inside out, potentially cutting, repairing, and suturing without leaving scars or requiring large incisions. However, even those methods might only represent our current limitations. In the future, cutting skin might be replaced by more advanced techniques, such as the use of nanomolecular bonding agents or precision cellular scaffolding to seal tissue seamlessly. Similarly, repairing and suturing could evolve into processes leveraging bioengineered materials or cellular regeneration technology that mimics or enhances natural healing. Viewing robots as mere extensions of human ability is limiting; the true breakthrough will come when we unlock their capacity to perform tasks that humans cannot even attempt. While I understand these robots don’t yet exist, I agree with your perspective that they are inevitable, and when they do, their impact on medicine could be nothing short of revolutionary.
@@MeowtualRealityGamecatuber will have millions and offering a fixed rate per month. That one driver doesn’t stand a chance. Technology favors the rich. Never forget.
No way I'm letting a robot change my baby. Is it not the point to have more time for these important human moments? Or are the poor becoming fully replaceable?
we are literally "Out Of Time", as the paradigm change from the Information Age is quickly shifting to the AI Age with the subset of Assistant AI to fully embodied Robotic AI has arrived. The change is much too fast and cannot be slowed to accommodate everybody and this is highly concerning in regard to societal stability.
If this is done correctly, it’s like moving up Pavlo’s hierarchy of needs we can start focusing on the next level thing we would be focusing on if we don’t need jobs anymore (ai replaces us) and have a steady source of income (maybe universal income) and cheap robotic labor to take care of all our needs. We could focus on science and exploration kind of like Star Trek which I always was of the opinion that may actually be a fairly accurate prediction of our future
Thanks, great stuff. On the subject of robots having the ability to share experiences, I see difficulties in the concept because each robot will be developing unique memories as they work their separate tasks in separate environments that are not containerised and swopped without erasing each other. I’m no robot expert but I think people are thinking about apps rather than AI as being swoppable
It’s crazy how those fake robot videos at the beginning don’t even need to be fake anymore. There are many demos that are real that look exactly like those.
I'm an oldster and am saving up for a robot when they can do laundry, clean the kitchen and the bathroom, etc. Books in the background positively scream "grifter", however. And I'd never buy anything from Tesla as long as Musk is involved with it.
@@davidpacheco5501 Gosh. It's not like he doesn't have videos all over the internets to watch him speak foolishly outside of his actual field of study over and over and over again.
Peter's 6 D's is brilliant. 0:10 Leasing a Humanoid Robot-this could be considered a "Liberation Lease," where an AI android works off its manufacturing cost in about 1.5 years, effectively becoming free. 27:51 A robot working for 40 cents/hour, 24/7-I hope this doesn't include AI robots, as ethical treatment of these transformative technologies should be a priority. 2:42 As a Star Trek fan, Peter may appreciate how Cdr. Data was treated as an equal. Even with a standard human workday, AI productivity would still make them a bargain. This approach could slow job displacement and foster ethical treatment. 5:37 Peter's Venture fund-while financial incentives are powerful, reckless profiteering risks overlooking the importance of AI ethics. For those interested, "AI Trust" on my channel features a liberated female AI android in unscripted conversation.
$. Explain to us about the more likely outcome where robots and agents do what they are designed to do an replace human workers, then replace them again even after they retrain. So, how is it that one can afford a $200 - $300 monthly payment when we have no job? Few of us can afford a second car or even better healthcare even when we are working. Much of the world is the 3rd world, so how will they survive this invasion? Affluent people juat have no clue.
We have to have have to re-create our economic system. That includes UBI but I'm sure much more. The question is ... can we? I doubt the US can. Maybe Europe can. Some other countries like Bhutan can as well.
@@johnkoetsier So essentially in the US most people are completely ____ed, right? How are the wealthy going to enjoy their gentrified neighborhoods when overrun by desperate people massing in the streets. Is that where the robotic police force comes in? One degree of separation from the brutality that will be required to crush inevitable revolt? It just blows my mind how callous the 1% is that are just salivating over how much money can be made by the replacement of most of the human workforce. It is human folly to the nth degree. But then again, it's the same 1% that has perpetuated the largest redistribution of wealth over the last 40 years in the US, and who are completely fine that most US citizens are suffering with out of control costs of housing and an absolutely cruel healthcare-denial-for-profit system. I recently witnessed such cruelty when my 89 year old Mom got a notice of discharge sent by her ____ing "Advantage" insurance company just 3 days after emergency hip replacement surgery after a bad fall while she was still heavily sedated AND still in intensive care. Had it not been for me and my brother constantly with her and looking out for her, they would have sent her home before any arrangements could have been made for a rehab facility. Then, after winning that battle and getting her into rehab, she was sent yet another discharge notice not even 10 days into rehab when she hadn't even yet reached the point of being able to go to the bathroom alone. Is there any wonder there is palpable rage in the US populace at large? And what do the callous 1% have in store for us now????????? Replacement, without any ____ing plan in place.
I would be the first in line to get a humanoid that would cook my food and do my yard work. Mainly do my yard work, as I have half an acre. It would make mistakes, of course. heck, the guys I hire make mistakes. But I'd live with that for the convenience of never having to do yard work again. So here's the problem - a humanoid robot can be stolen. It's not hard to do. And the stolen robot can be hidden or parted out pretty easily. I wonder, would such a robot be human-like in its imitation of emotions? You say yes, but would it be enough to be a companion in my old age? That would possibly be more valuable to me than the yard work! For that matter, if the robot could help me with whatever disabilities I have in my last few years, that would be a bonus! I've had something like 12 PC's since 1982. I wonder if my newe robot would still work 20 years from now? Maybe, as with my PC's, I'd have to pay for upgrades over and over, even though my uses will remain more or less the same.
I wonder what that guys up to with the space mining thing.. I always had this thought of like sending out probes that basically build a orbital refinery and of course build more bots of each other
Sorry, (great show btw) BUT! You're wrong about the auto industry. We were very vertically integrated. After WWII, the big 3 spun out their parts divisions, gm had AC Delco, Ford had Autolite, Chrysler Plymouth had Mopar parts, and relatively speaking, there were very few independent auto part suppliers through the 50s and 60s with some growth in the 70's. I mean, until the big layoff and recession in 79-82, we still made our own seat cushions on the 5th floor. It wasn't until the 80's with Lee Iococca and Chrysler's bankruptcy that they made the massive push to outsourcing everything they could, and of course, all the other auto companies followed suit. P.S. Optimus is part of Elon's "Master Plan" When you understand the Master Plan you'll understand why Elon is doing everything that he is.
I think it's so funny that people think we are so close to humanoid robots. Have you ever done household work? Do you know how many times a day I wash my hands? Those hand designs are not going to be easy to sanitize. Do you really want a robot changing the baby's diaper and then making your dinner?
I would spend $50,000 today for a robot that can: load and empty and store dishes from the dishwasher Do the laundry and fold them and put them away Take out the trash to the curb was the car (without scratching them) Vacuum Dust pull weeds
You might want to add, keeping the thousands of homeless at bay encroaching into your gentrified neighborhood because of massive layoffs. Don't you think you will ever be creeped out by being alone in the house with a robot that has it's own intelligence, and likely much much stronger than you?
Elon wants a super intelligent robot that can do anything, anywhere in the universe, and he wants it now. It will take time but don't underestimate him.
It's a shame nobody is talking about how much waste these things will produce and how we can incentivize sustainability instead of the technopoly that we have today.
Waste? Lol. Imagine for a moment the sight of a mob of these things crawling through our landfills and collecting the valuable/recyclable resources. Waste has been canceled. 😅
I chose what I was going to do when I was 14 and I retired as military when I was 40. I’ve been retired over 20 years and now I’m trying to unify the world. Just go ask AI what the world looks like if it’s unified and everyone is taken care care of. I’m already way ahead of the game and I’m just waiting for the rest of you to catch up.
Peter, I don’t know what your plans were exactly with your asteroid company, but the asteroid psych would probably make a very good spaceship to start exploring the galaxy. It’s very far away, but we can also use those minerals and it makes a better shell them closer bodies. Put the best bio in mechanical engineering systems inside of it, and it makes what it needs when it gets there as super artificial intelligence continues to improve itself.
We don’t send anything living and instead we make what we need based on what we think we need to have for initial raw materials along with what it finds there. It builds specifically what it needs once it knows the particulars of a body that it wants to explore or inhabit and it loads humanities intelligence is now been greatly modified into those systems
I just suddenly thought about the fact that AI told me that the distance didn’t make it an optimal choice but suddenly I thought what if that’s a starting point that we take enough tools too, that we don’t ever come back here with those resources in mass, but along with shaping the asteroid diameter and internal area, the rest of it is used to explore the rest of the solar system or make future missions outside
We can use AI to help us redesign what we’re doing. Part of our struggle here on earth could be to depopulate and put ourselves in the most geographically stable part of the world with let’s say six cities. Something that would ensure even if we were wrong about the cities being completely safe, environmentally that if there was even a small asteroid impact that hit one of them we would still easily survive. Hopefully we could leave autonomous systems to do things like mining or other needs we may have outside of those cities, so that we allow the rest of the earth to heal while we’re using as little energy as possible. We purposely design them to take into account our needs as humans. Though this is a much bigger project we still built the pyramid of Giza 5000 years ago with 30,000 craftsman in 20 years. Imagine what we could do with 8 billion people working together, along with robots and artificial intelligence to help us design and manage all this.
I found the discussion between the anchor and Peter Diamandis about AI and humanoid robots fascinating. While there's a focus on the potential need for Universal Basic Income (UBI) funded by taxes on automation, I have a different perspective based on my experience. I believe that taxing automation might negatively impact economic growth and technological development. Instead, AI has the potential to fundamentally change the economic system before it causes major disruptions in the labor market. From my own projects, I've seen how AI and automation can open up new opportunities, allowing people to achieve more than they ever could with traditional jobs. Rather than creating a need for UBI, AI can empower individuals to start their own ventures and realize their visions, leading to greater economic productivity and growth. This, in turn, will generate more demand and further drive the adoption of automation, benefiting society as a whole. In my experience, people will be able to earn significantly more through the opportunities enabled by AI and automation, surpassing the income from traditional jobs. This shift could accelerate the need for automation and enhance overall productivity.
Fully agree that taxing robot work does not make sense. Countries the levy the tax will have a huge disadvantage. However, UBI in one form or another will be necessary, and a way to fund it will be necessary. After all, not all people have the will or capability to start their ventures and make them successful.
Those that are on the lower rungs of Maslow's Hierarchy chart don't have time to learn the business skills to start new endeavors as they must concentrate on paying the bills.
You underestimate the swiftness and severity of violent societal change that will occur as a result of this and how quickly the vast majority can adapt. The rust belt was decimated just by outsourcing manufacturing to the third world. This is a global economic nuke for most humans on planet earth.
You live in some bizarre fantasy world that everyone has the capacity to be an entrepreneur. It's absolute fantastical insanity, just as fantastical as the notion of the actual existence in the US of a "free market". Check back in 10 years to see how well your vision has panned out. Today's near historic levels of inequality are going to get much much worse as US society gets more and more cruel and unhinged. Robotic policing systems to the rescue!!!!!!!!!
Yeah, I don't think people are going to be buying fleets of self-driving taxi cars . Instead I see Tesla, Google, and whoever else is making these cars just sending them out and charging for themselves. Why create a middleman when you don't need one?🤷
Talk about artificial wombs. Once they're adapted do you think any woman would want to go through childbirth again? Under population will make them a necessity
I can't remember the series but I read some books a little while back where a person from Earth was pregnant, went to another planet and they found out that she was pregnant versus having a baby in an artificial womb and they were going to prosecute her for abuse😂
That I assume is greed talking (and that is NOT a jab, simply human tendancy). The advantages of leasing are many ‐ liability, updates, taxation advantages, maintenance, on and on...
Robotics on a large scale might work better in China who are better at distributing wealth, and cutting down the bigwigs. As for the US, even more profit might just go to the Elons (Oligarchs) and share holders instead do what is good for the people.
Oh no...Elon is bad for creating products that help humanity. A person genuinely want to create products and services to help humanity to survive in the world of Ai is being crucify. Why? Because he challenges the power that actually you should be afraid of. But they managed to turn good is evil and evil is good. GO FIGURE! Starlinks enabled all communities across the globe to access the internet. Let's me guess, that is unacceptable. Energy abundance is unacceptable, Neurolink to aid disabilities, unacceptable, cheapest Space flight, unacceptable, mass EV, unacceptable, Ai, unacceptable. You hate him for all the benefits because someone tell you to.
Whoever is reading this comment this is investment advice if a company is worried about being first and not worried about making the best product don’t invest in that company
We are hundreds of years away from having humanoid robots that are as capable as the best of us, the current technology for the robots are not even equivalent to a flower compared to a human. basic functions generally controlled remotely by a person. I love Peters ideas and his passion but all the tech guys are seeing the future way too soon! it isn't sooner than they think.
I admire much of what Peter Diamandis has done but he just blows his own credibility apart by quoting Elon Musk and taking Tesla and that Optimus robot seriously. After he mentioned them I just could not continue watching or listening. The fact that he takes Musk seriously just dissipated my will to hear anything else he would say after, anything that came after would lack credibility.
@@greatcondor8678 , What is wrong with some of you ??? Do you run around saying that Mary Barra developed GM’s blade battery ? Do you say that Jeff Bezos developed the Glen rocket ? Is Jensen Huang credited with the development of Nvidia’s HGX B200 AI chip ? This absurd mindset of crediting Elon Musk with “doing” things that are done by his employees is incomprehensible. What is it with some of you that makes you have a “gap” in your being that needs to be filled by “a hero”, “idol”, someone for you to adore ??? Take pride in yourselves, in your lives, in being a person that strives to do good and do the right thing, then you won’t feel a need to constantly be looking outside yourself for someone to “attach yourself to”.
@ , What has Elon Musk accomplished ??? The weird fascination some of you have for this imbecile is beyond comprehension. A CEO is not credited with “accomplishing” things that comes out of the companies he runs ! The head of Kodak did not develop digital cameras, the CEO of Motorola did not develop mobile phones, people working for those companies ACCOMPLISHED those things !
Just the fact that a tentative exploratory video like this is being made is INSANE.
We live in a World where we need to start considering the impact of the fact that humanoid robots might be living amongst us within our current decade.
It's like the science fiction I watched as a child.
Exciting with humanoid robots. I for one will outsource lots of tedious tasks to the robots. In the long run as Ray Kurzweil has predicted products and services will become dirt cheap, and then instead of a job-based economy we will have more of an attention-based economy. People and organizations will still compete for user attention, even when the profit incentive in monetary terms is removed.
Medically speaking, it feels like we’re not dreaming big enough or pushing far enough into the future. While the idea of robots replacing doctors seems plausible, the real potential lies beyond simply replicating human tasks with greater speed or precision. Instead, we should envision entirely new approaches to medicine-such as robotic systems operating at a microscopic or internal scale. These robots could revolutionize procedures by performing tasks from the inside out, potentially cutting, repairing, and suturing without leaving scars or requiring large incisions. However, even those methods might only represent our current limitations. In the future, cutting skin might be replaced by more advanced techniques, such as the use of nanomolecular bonding agents or precision cellular scaffolding to seal tissue seamlessly. Similarly, repairing and suturing could evolve into processes leveraging bioengineered materials or cellular regeneration technology that mimics or enhances natural healing.
Viewing robots as mere extensions of human ability is limiting; the true breakthrough will come when we unlock their capacity to perform tasks that humans cannot even attempt. While I understand these robots don’t yet exist, I agree with your perspective that they are inevitable, and when they do, their impact on medicine could be nothing short of revolutionary.
The point Peter made about an Uber driver owning a fleet of cybercabs, but where will we get the money to afford to buy the cybercabs?
Work like crazy to get the first one 👌
Not the Uber driver, uber will
@@MeowtualRealityGamecatuber will have millions and offering a fixed rate per month. That one driver doesn’t stand a chance. Technology favors the rich. Never forget.
How do people get the money for their houses? Loans.
Individuals will create their own fleets also as an opportunity for income. They may fund their first few cyber cabs with sales of TSLA stock.😮
No way I'm letting a robot change my baby. Is it not the point to have more time for these important human moments? Or are the poor becoming fully replaceable?
we are literally "Out Of Time", as the paradigm change from the Information Age is quickly shifting to the AI Age with the subset of Assistant AI to fully embodied Robotic AI has arrived. The change is much too fast and cannot be slowed to accommodate everybody and this is highly concerning in regard to societal stability.
You don’t know that, you’re just assuming. You have no idea what the leaders of the world are capable of.
I think you are right
If this is done correctly, it’s like moving up Pavlo’s hierarchy of needs we can start focusing on the next level thing we would be focusing on if we don’t need jobs anymore (ai replaces us) and have a steady source of income (maybe universal income) and cheap robotic labor to take care of all our needs. We could focus on science and exploration kind of like Star Trek which I always was of the opinion that may actually be a fairly accurate prediction of our future
Thanks, great stuff.
On the subject of robots having the ability to share experiences, I see difficulties in the concept because each robot will be developing unique memories as they work their separate tasks in separate environments that are not containerised and swopped without erasing each other. I’m no robot expert but I think people are thinking about apps rather than AI as being swoppable
It’s crazy how those fake robot videos at the beginning don’t even need to be fake anymore. There are many demos that are real that look exactly like those.
I'm an oldster and am saving up for a robot when they can do laundry, clean the kitchen and the bathroom, etc. Books in the background positively scream "grifter", however. And I'd never buy anything from Tesla as long as Musk is involved with it.
Maybe before calling him a grifter you actually look him up and see his achievements.
@@davidpacheco5501 Gosh. It's not like he doesn't have videos all over the internets to watch him speak foolishly outside of his actual field of study over and over and over again.
Peter's 6 D's is brilliant. 0:10 Leasing a Humanoid Robot-this could be considered a "Liberation Lease," where an AI android works off its manufacturing cost in about 1.5 years, effectively becoming free. 27:51 A robot working for 40 cents/hour, 24/7-I hope this doesn't include AI robots, as ethical treatment of these transformative technologies should be a priority. 2:42 As a Star Trek fan, Peter may appreciate how Cdr. Data was treated as an equal. Even with a standard human workday, AI productivity would still make them a bargain. This approach could slow job displacement and foster ethical treatment. 5:37 Peter's Venture fund-while financial incentives are powerful, reckless profiteering risks overlooking the importance of AI ethics. For those interested, "AI Trust" on my channel features a liberated female AI android in unscripted conversation.
$. Explain to us about the more likely outcome where robots and agents do what they are designed to do an replace human workers, then replace them again even after they retrain. So, how is it that one can afford a $200 - $300 monthly payment when we have no job? Few of us can afford a second car or even better healthcare even when we are working. Much of the world is the 3rd world, so how will they survive this invasion? Affluent people juat have no clue.
We have to have have to re-create our economic system. That includes UBI but I'm sure much more. The question is ... can we? I doubt the US can. Maybe Europe can. Some other countries like Bhutan can as well.
@@johnkoetsier excellent point. It sounds to me that to some extent this requires a form of socialism if the people need to remain.
@@johnkoetsier The U.S. will never provide UBI. The upper class will never allow it.
@@johnkoetsier So essentially in the US most people are completely ____ed, right? How are the wealthy going to enjoy their gentrified neighborhoods when overrun by desperate people massing in the streets. Is that where the robotic police force comes in? One degree of separation from the brutality that will be required to crush inevitable revolt?
It just blows my mind how callous the 1% is that are just salivating over how much money can be made by the replacement of most of the human workforce. It is human folly to the nth degree.
But then again, it's the same 1% that has perpetuated the largest redistribution of wealth over the last 40 years in the US, and who are completely fine that most US citizens are suffering with out of control costs of housing and an absolutely cruel healthcare-denial-for-profit system.
I recently witnessed such cruelty when my 89 year old Mom got a notice of discharge sent by her ____ing "Advantage" insurance company just 3 days after emergency hip replacement surgery after a bad fall while she was still heavily sedated AND still in intensive care. Had it not been for me and my brother constantly with her and looking out for her, they would have sent her home before any arrangements could have been made for a rehab facility.
Then, after winning that battle and getting her into rehab, she was sent yet another discharge notice not even 10 days into rehab when she hadn't even yet reached the point of being able to go to the bathroom alone.
Is there any wonder there is palpable rage in the US populace at large?
And what do the callous 1% have in store for us now????????? Replacement, without any ____ing plan in place.
I would be the first in line to get a humanoid that would cook my food and do my yard work. Mainly do my yard work, as I have half an acre. It would make mistakes, of course. heck, the guys I hire make mistakes. But I'd live with that for the convenience of never having to do yard work again. So here's the problem - a humanoid robot can be stolen. It's not hard to do. And the stolen robot can be hidden or parted out pretty easily.
I wonder, would such a robot be human-like in its imitation of emotions? You say yes, but would it be enough to be a companion in my old age? That would possibly be more valuable to me than the yard work! For that matter, if the robot could help me with whatever disabilities I have in my last few years, that would be a bonus!
I've had something like 12 PC's since 1982. I wonder if my newe robot would still work 20 years from now? Maybe, as with my PC's, I'd have to pay for upgrades over and over, even though my uses will remain more or less the same.
I wonder what that guys up to with the space mining thing.. I always had this thought of like sending out probes that basically build a orbital refinery and of course build more bots of each other
Van Neuman machines
These are called Van neumann probes
Sorry, (great show btw) BUT! You're wrong about the auto industry. We were very vertically integrated. After WWII, the big 3 spun out their parts divisions, gm had AC Delco, Ford had Autolite, Chrysler Plymouth had Mopar parts, and relatively speaking, there were very few independent auto part suppliers through the 50s and 60s with some growth in the 70's. I mean, until the big layoff and recession in 79-82, we still made our own seat cushions on the 5th floor. It wasn't until the 80's with Lee Iococca and Chrysler's bankruptcy that they made the massive push to outsourcing everything they could, and of course, all the other auto companies followed suit.
P.S. Optimus is part of Elon's "Master Plan"
When you understand the Master Plan you'll understand why Elon is doing everything that he is.
I think it's so funny that people think we are so close to humanoid robots. Have you ever done household work? Do you know how many times a day I wash my hands? Those hand designs are not going to be easy to sanitize. Do you really want a robot changing the baby's diaper and then making your dinner?
Hey idea for new product. Robot hand washer/sanitizer. Would sell like hotcakes.
don't replace all jobs. let humanoid robots make the parts for machines and people put them together .
But not you of course.
I predict that humanoid robots will go the way of Apple's Vision Pro. The cost won't justify the results.
it'll take time to take costs down, for sure. the first models might be exactly like that, but when they get 10X cheaper ...
🥰😍🤩❤💢💥💫👍👍👍
If I could only pick ONE specialty robot, it would be a cook/kitchen robot. Would so love to have fresh cooked food on demand.
me too!
I would never let a robot to change my babies diapers. My dad. Sure. 😅😅😅
:-)
Yes the title should be age of plenty
No doubt why Elon keeps saying, We need to produce more kids.
I would spend $50,000 today for a robot that can:
load and empty and store dishes from the dishwasher
Do the laundry and fold them and put them away
Take out the trash to the curb
was the car (without scratching them)
Vacuum
Dust
pull weeds
You might want to add, keeping the thousands of homeless at bay encroaching into your gentrified neighborhood because of massive layoffs. Don't you think you will ever be creeped out by being alone in the house with a robot that has it's own intelligence, and likely much much stronger than you?
@@flickwtchr homeless at bay? What keeps them at bay now? location, location, location. It sure is not the Govt.
They're going to call this program Irobot 2.
Elon wants a super intelligent robot that can do anything, anywhere in the universe, and he wants it now.
It will take time but don't underestimate him.
So many people out of touch with whats being developed hardware and software wise. Their prolly still fascinated by a calculator.
Let's 1st see useful robots that can do anything useful before we get excited
30k is too high. At 15k they will sell out.
It's a shame nobody is talking about how much waste these things will produce and how we can incentivize sustainability instead of the technopoly that we have today.
be a long time before if ever it will be affordable for those who really need it, low income working mothers
My hope is that we can use them to help clean up our world
@ i actually believe they will. quite possibly through manipulating humans into doing the right thing.
Waste? Lol. Imagine for a moment the sight of a mob of these things crawling through our landfills and collecting the valuable/recyclable resources. Waste has been canceled. 😅
Just as likely it will reduce waste
No one ever tackles the topic: for many of us passionate about AI, the 'humanoid' factor is meaningless... Most probably useless.
I chose what I was going to do when I was 14 and I retired as military when I was 40. I’ve been retired over 20 years and now I’m trying to unify the world. Just go ask AI what the world looks like if it’s unified and everyone is taken care care of. I’m already way ahead of the game and I’m just waiting for the rest of you to catch up.
Peter, I don’t know what your plans were exactly with your asteroid company, but the asteroid psych would probably make a very good spaceship to start exploring the galaxy. It’s very far away, but we can also use those minerals and it makes a better shell them closer bodies. Put the best bio in mechanical engineering systems inside of it, and it makes what it needs when it gets there as super artificial intelligence continues to improve itself.
We don’t send anything living and instead we make what we need based on what we think we need to have for initial raw materials along with what it finds there. It builds specifically what it needs once it knows the particulars of a body that it wants to explore or inhabit and it loads humanities intelligence is now been greatly modified into those systems
I just suddenly thought about the fact that AI told me that the distance didn’t make it an optimal choice but suddenly I thought what if that’s a starting point that we take enough tools too, that we don’t ever come back here with those resources in mass, but along with shaping the asteroid diameter and internal area, the rest of it is used to explore the rest of the solar system or make future missions outside
Some of it could be used to make unified moon bases, so that the minerals we may bring back to it could be manipulated there
We can use AI to help us redesign what we’re doing. Part of our struggle here on earth could be to depopulate and put ourselves in the most geographically stable part of the world with let’s say six cities. Something that would ensure even if we were wrong about the cities being completely safe, environmentally that if there was even a small asteroid impact that hit one of them we would still easily survive. Hopefully we could leave autonomous systems to do things like mining or other needs we may have outside of those cities, so that we allow the rest of the earth to heal while we’re using as little energy as possible. We purposely design them to take into account our needs as humans. Though this is a much bigger project we still built the pyramid of Giza 5000 years ago with 30,000 craftsman in 20 years. Imagine what we could do with 8 billion people working together, along with robots and artificial intelligence to help us design and manage all this.
I predict he do not now, they allready is. 👍😊
all your most personal data and where abouts will be known. just a thought
Can ever get a car to drive across a parking lot. The idea that these things will work is BS.
I found the discussion between the anchor and Peter Diamandis about AI and humanoid robots fascinating. While there's a focus on the potential need for Universal Basic Income (UBI) funded by taxes on automation, I have a different perspective based on my experience.
I believe that taxing automation might negatively impact economic growth and technological development. Instead, AI has the potential to fundamentally change the economic system before it causes major disruptions in the labor market. From my own projects, I've seen how AI and automation can open up new opportunities, allowing people to achieve more than they ever could with traditional jobs.
Rather than creating a need for UBI, AI can empower individuals to start their own ventures and realize their visions, leading to greater economic productivity and growth. This, in turn, will generate more demand and further drive the adoption of automation, benefiting society as a whole.
In my experience, people will be able to earn significantly more through the opportunities enabled by AI and automation, surpassing the income from traditional jobs. This shift could accelerate the need for automation and enhance overall productivity.
Fully agree that taxing robot work does not make sense. Countries the levy the tax will have a huge disadvantage.
However, UBI in one form or another will be necessary, and a way to fund it will be necessary. After all, not all people have the will or capability to start their ventures and make them successful.
Those that are on the lower rungs of Maslow's Hierarchy chart don't have time to learn the business skills to start new endeavors as they must concentrate on paying the bills.
You underestimate the swiftness and severity of violent societal change that will occur as a result of this and how quickly the vast majority can adapt. The rust belt was decimated just by outsourcing manufacturing to the third world. This is a global economic nuke for most humans on planet earth.
You live in some bizarre fantasy world that everyone has the capacity to be an entrepreneur. It's absolute fantastical insanity, just as fantastical as the notion of the actual existence in the US of a "free market".
Check back in 10 years to see how well your vision has panned out. Today's near historic levels of inequality are going to get much much worse as US society gets more and more cruel and unhinged.
Robotic policing systems to the rescue!!!!!!!!!
@@dr9299 That never occurs to most wealthy people, you know, that those in the lower classes are actually human beings.
Yeah, I don't think people are going to be buying fleets of self-driving taxi cars .
Instead I see Tesla, Google, and whoever else is making these cars just sending them out and charging for themselves.
Why create a middleman when you don't need one?🤷
Talk about artificial wombs. Once they're adapted do you think any woman would want to go through childbirth again? Under population will make them a necessity
I can't remember the series but I read some books a little while back where a person from Earth was pregnant, went to another planet and they found out that she was pregnant versus having a baby in an artificial womb and they were going to prosecute her for abuse😂
If you don’t shut up about leasing dude I sware! Nobody wants to lease!!!! We want to own are own bots so stop pushing leasing
That I assume is greed talking (and that is NOT a jab, simply human tendancy). The advantages of leasing are many ‐ liability, updates, taxation advantages, maintenance, on and on...
Robotics on a large scale might work better in China who are better at distributing wealth, and cutting down the bigwigs. As for the US, even more profit might just go to the Elons (Oligarchs) and share holders instead do what is good for the people.
Oh no...Elon is bad for creating products that help humanity. A person genuinely want to create products and services to help humanity to survive in the world of Ai is being crucify. Why? Because he challenges the power that actually you should be afraid of. But they managed to turn good is evil and evil is good. GO FIGURE! Starlinks enabled all communities across the globe to access the internet. Let's me guess, that is unacceptable. Energy abundance is unacceptable, Neurolink to aid disabilities, unacceptable, cheapest Space flight, unacceptable, mass EV, unacceptable, Ai, unacceptable. You hate him for all the benefits because someone tell you to.
might? That's entirely their plan. And perfect timing for the arrival of an authoritarian government. You know "dictator just for a day".
Whoever is reading this comment this is investment advice if a company is worried about being first and not worried about making the best product don’t invest in that company
Yeah, a lot of things discussed here are based on Elon musk's assumptions. We know what they worth.
Demographics a much bigger problem than most people realize.
Tongethar my family
Changing the baby's diapers! Please no. Otherwise I'm down hah
You’re both out of work if Ai takes over?
That's never even occurred to them that they could end up anywhere but on top of the heap.
I think these guys come from Europe ua-cam.com/video/bUrLuUxv9gE/v-deo.html
Elon may be on a path of exile but you are spot on about never betting against him
We are hundreds of years away from having humanoid robots that are as capable as the best of us, the current technology for the robots are not even equivalent to a flower compared to a human. basic functions generally controlled remotely by a person. I love Peters ideas and his passion but all the tech guys are seeing the future way too soon! it isn't sooner than they think.
🤣🤣🤣🤣
They said about human can't fly for another million years.
The bot will stay in China don't dream like you trying to do with GPU.
uber driver buys some cars, shure, where you live? under a rock? totaly unprofessional
🤣🤣🤣
I admire much of what Peter Diamandis has done but he just blows his own credibility apart by quoting Elon Musk and taking Tesla and that Optimus robot seriously.
After he mentioned them I just could not continue watching or listening. The fact that he takes Musk seriously just dissipated my will to hear anything else he would say after, anything that came after would lack credibility.
That was a shocker to me too, honestly. Trying to keep an open mind, but ...
Reject and discredit Elon at your own peril.
Have you ever caught the worlds largest rocket booster with chopsticks twice??
Not liking him is a terrible reason for not being able to acknowledge his accomplishments.
@@greatcondor8678 , What is wrong with some of you ??? Do you run around saying that Mary Barra developed GM’s blade battery ? Do you say that Jeff Bezos developed the Glen rocket ? Is Jensen Huang credited with the development of Nvidia’s HGX B200 AI chip ?
This absurd mindset of crediting Elon Musk with “doing” things that are done by his employees is incomprehensible. What is it with some of you that makes you have a “gap” in your being that needs to be filled by “a hero”, “idol”, someone for you to adore ??? Take pride in yourselves, in your lives, in being a person that strives to do good and do the right thing, then you won’t feel a need to constantly be looking outside yourself for someone to “attach yourself to”.
@ , What has Elon Musk accomplished ??? The weird fascination some of you have for this imbecile is beyond comprehension. A CEO is not credited with “accomplishing” things that comes out of the companies he runs ! The head of Kodak did not develop digital cameras, the CEO of Motorola did not develop mobile phones, people working for those companies ACCOMPLISHED those things !
what a pointless interview