Exactly Paul, when I was about late teens I started to get KO magazine monthly from the Newsagents in the late 80s and to say that they underrated McCallum wouldn't be even close. They never spoke about him or had him even higher than no 3 when he was a junior middleweight. I never understood that because at the time he had good wins against the frighteningly good hitter Julian Jackson and Donald Curry who had come back well and looked his old self after losing at welter to Honeyghan 18 months earlier. Reg Gutteridge called him "The great Mike McCallum" before one of his bouts. Only the likes of James Toney and Roy Jones could lick him on points. I think he had a draw against Sumbu kalambay and one against Toney I'd have to check but no doubt Mike McCallum was a great fighter. I remember him knocking out Michael Watson too who was a good solid compact middleweight with massive heart and solid defence. He boxed evenly with Herol Graham in a close bout too and Herol who was flawed in some regards wasn't easy to box against but Mike managed it. He was a patient solid Jr middle and middleweight. I think towards the end didn't he fight above middle too? May have fought Jones and Toney at super middle or Jones at middle and Toney at super middle? I'd have to double check was such a long time ago.
Dead right Paul Anthony, the toney fights were classics as well. The boxing ability from both sides was sublime. Great against Jeff harding too and even Roy Jones you could see the respect he had for McCallum. We know the American press seem to big up their own fighters and disregard others but that's no matter, good is good and anyone with the knowledge could see how good the man was . Good to converse with somebody who knows the game, thanks brother 👍👍
@@paulanthony5274 He lost to Sumbu in their first by UD or MD and won the rematch by SD. Sumbu is also criminally underrated and unfairly remembered only by the surprising first round ko loss to Michael Nunn.
Now this is the classic respectful art of " Sparring " . Compared to the present day sparring sessions with the pros. Today the sparring sessions are so disrespectful to the Queensbuiry sparring rules, present day, they try to take your head off instead off working and fixing flaws to advance their craft of the sweet science of boxing.
I think Mike showed against Jackson he could take the power punches and continue on and beat you, I think he beats Hearns in a great fight, at JWM, Floyd has not shot against either one, Leonard also beats him there, as does Terry norris, who also could box, was fast and had an awesome left hook.
Watching Tommys flick jab is like a cobra strike it’s prey, so quick the eye can’t see it..Masterful boxers, and 2 of my all time favourites. It would be an honour to meet them one day. I could watch this all day.🥊
These two masters display such incredible skills, with a huge respect and control to each other’s. They never hit with mean intention, but still, I’m amazed by this amazing demonstration.
@ 4:58 hearns whole attitude change a bit after that left hook,(making sounds and smiling).Mccallum is a kind of fighter to catch up to you in a 12rd fight . Guessing manny saw a pattern developing and did not approve ...
The "Body Snatcher" was one of the most technical old school fighters out there . I had a youngster out here today just getting into the sport,( I'm telling him or her to just study Mike McCullen fights ,especially via "Donald Curry "& "Julian Jackson".
That's true. Unfortunately, some that came along later only got to see him fight when he was up in age and past his prime years, even then , he was still no pushover
i enjoyed this more than most pro fights nowadays. quality work from both men, deep skills on show. have you seen the toney - mcclellan sparring video? that's mesmerising too.
Hearns was faster than McCallum and he hit much harder when he was delivering single full power punches. But McCallum was a much more rounded fighter and he was much better on the inside than Hearns. Hearns biggest problems were his durability and his stamina - two areas where McCallum was excellent. Hearns didn't have a glass chin but he was one of those guys who when they get hurt they lose their composure and technique and they get sloppy. If they fought It would either be Hearns inside 3 rounds or McCallum with a 9-12th round stoppage.
Hearns inside three minutes against McCallum, really? I mean this man fought all the killers but was never knocked out. The likes of Julian Jackson, Jam😢Toney, Roy Jones, Steve Collins . He was never knocked down, the four kings didn't want to get in a ring with him for a reason.
Then again mccallum fought hard hitters and was never dazed. I see mccallum getting the better of hearns. He was avoided for a reason. Even in his late 30s the man was a killer. The moment someone closed hearns distances it was almost always over. Even Barkley got to him.
Sparring is sparring it does not entirely reflect how an actual bout would progress, having said that, what is clearly apparent, is that Tommy had a much faster and all-round superior jab than Mike and in an actual fight Tommy would utilise his superbly disguised laser like right hand.
Tommy's jab was his best asset but his inability to take a huge punch and Mccallum's body work and amazing stamina would have won him the fight in the later rounds imo. There is no doubt in my mind he would have knocked out Tommy.
McCallum is probably the most complete and skilled fighter i've ever seen. He had it all: Excellent jab, inside game, brutal body attack, master defense, very high ring IQ, granite chin, stamina, footwork, accuracy, timing, no waste of energy... On the other hand, Hearns got more power, speed and reach than McCallum. But that's it. In every other department Mike was clearly better. Hearns would attack McCallum with a barrage of brutal punches but Mike would dodge almost every punch. Tommy tend to be over anxious in big fights and he used to let himself wide open when attacking, then Mike would counter punch him to death and also slow him down progressively with body shots. Hearns chin was allways suspect and his stamina was poor mostly because of his over anxiety when attacking in the earlier rounds. All of these factors would lead into McCallum TKO'ing Hearns in the mid/late rounds
Hearns had a much better jab. And in these weights - hearns moved much better as well. Add that he could fight of the back foot - mike couldnt. To me that makes tommy more diverse. Ill just add that i think mike wins h2h.
@@eranliber5993 you should go and watch Mike McCallum as you obviously don’t know anything at all lol. Never catch Mike getting tired down the stretch or getting Ko’d cold in his prime. Pure boxing pugilist. Furthermore, hearns named him the body snatcher, and also hearns and manny didn’t wanna fight him . Either did Ray he beat rays bro in the amateurs. And the way he broke down Julian Jackson countering with body shots. Mike came up the hard way! 🇯🇲
@@thefootballandboxingchanne2357 i did see a decent portion of his fights that i could find. And i love mccallum. EXTREMELY UNDERRATED. what i wrote is just my feeling in a h2h match. Tommy imo had the best jab in the lower divisions, especially back in his day. Tommy also moved very good (mike also) but hearns was quicker. as for conditioning? Absolutely right. Hearns could be gassed out when didnt fight the right fight and it was possible. Btw - i heard that tommy ducked mccallum - and i cant say or validate anything. But i guess many top guys did. Sure, mike was a prime boxer - but unlike hearns, hagler, duran and leonard - he didnt bring big numbers, money and exposure so it felt like a lose-lose situation to put your title in the line and gaining very little from it. Dont get me wrong - i absolutely think the best should fight the best, and tommy and mike @154 wouldve been epic, but i guess when your title in the line and big money comes into play - words speak louder than actions. Anyway - BIG respect for mike. His 1st fight against toney remains one of my absolute favorites.
@@eranliber5993 hearns outboxes mc callum. The spots mc callum was most dangerous hearns wouldn’t give him. Unless the gas tank like said.And I like mc callum more than hearns .more complete .
This is beautiful stuff! You can see elements of both mens greatest skills. Tommy's dominance from outside and Mikes owning inside game. Great watch for students of the game!
Seeing two future HOF fighters spar back in the day is GOLD. I wish I could have watched what was taped at the KRONK gym back in the day. Both guys did great things in the ring which made the sport great back in the 80's and 90's. I sent a letter to the Kronk gym back in 1982 begging for a pic of Tommy Hearns and a few weeks later it arrived. Still have the envelope to this day. Love old school stuff Best ime of Boxing no doubt.
Boy what a great fight this would have been. Love Tommy, but I gotta go with the body snatcher. After seeing McCallum destroy Julian Jackson, who was as big a puncher as anybody, I have no doubt he could handle Tommy's power. The x-factor in this fight is Tommy's chin, which seemed to betray him in big fights. I see Hearns leading on points by around round 5 or 6, and then McCallum catching him. The Body Snatcher by TKO, round 7.
Jackson wasn't the fighter tommy was. Yeah ge had power. But he didn't have the ring IQ, precision, and speed as tommy. Plus i doubt he punched significantly harder than Tommy. His hooks were powerfy, but Tommy's straights were. Plus his hooks had pop too. Cang compare Jackson to the HITMAN
The problem with that comparison is that it doesn’t take into account the fact that Hearns is far better than Jackson in every other aspect apart from power (where he’s merely equal).
Maan this is a wet dream come true! this must gave been ´83 or ´84 mccallum left steward and kronk after hearns fought duran in ´84, hearns is so smooth in there this really was his peak between ´82-´86 he looked so sharp.
you're right that Mike could probably outbox Tommy, but I'm not too sure Mike would have chosen to try to outbox him I'm a real bout. instead he would have timed the hell out of Tommy to the body, taken away his legs and ko'd him late. I'd go with Mike in a battle of attrition
Carlos Rosa It's a tough call. Most people judge Tommy onhis two biggest fights. First one with Leonard and with Hagler. Lot of people forget that he was indisposed in both fights. Overtrained for Leonard and broken right hand in fight with Hagler among other things. Biggest weaknes was his chin but that I think was a result of that hard knockout from Hagler. The closest they've been to fight each other was before Duran Hearns when they both had Mike as mandatory. Hearns was in his prime and if he came in fight with Mike in a same condition (which is something you couldn't rely on with Tommy) I think it would be very hard night for Bodysnatcher.
TzFrank Hagler could box and brawl. Hagler could fight on inside and outside. And he could go to the body very good too. Yeah he was slower but he was also harder puncher and his skills were very good too. Don't forget he's one of the best switch hitters ever. I see it 50:50.
McCallum le da cátedras a Hearns. Hearns es bueno y aún así McCallum lo asedia, acorrala, lleva contra las cuerdas, y después le deja trabajar, se mantiene humilde
Beautiful. They look so relaxed and focused at the same time. Every move is natural, every step is the right one. Sweet Science at its best, and this is just a sparring session. Imagine how a real fight between them would have been...
I think that McCallum could have beaten Hearns (I don't know that he WOULD have beaten him, but he definitely COULD have). I don't think it would have been like the Jackson fight, though. Jackson's power was maybe, maybe, maybe comparable to Hearns's, but he was nowhere near as quick and skilled as Tommy. (Hearns and Jackson had--unfortunately--similar jaws, though.)
Only people who say that he's underrated are actually the ones who underrate him, he was always a great boxer and always have the respect of the boxing world,
For anyone who thinks McCallum got the better of Hearns in this, you need to consider this Hearns has clearly been instructed to hold his big right hand back and I know this because I speak from experience. I was an amateur national champion in Houston and I was a skinny 6 foot tall lightweight with a booming right hand like Hearns. I can remember every time I got into the ring to spar with someone, that fighters trainer would yell across the ring to my trainer before the sparing session began. "tell him to hold that right hand" they would say. In other words tell your fighter to hold up on throwing his most powerful punch or if he throws it tell him to throw it soft. Now look at this and tell me how many right hands Hearns throws, none just jabs and hooks. At3:30 he throws one but clearly pulls it. NOW go back and look at McCallum fights against McCrory, Curry and Toney to see how easy it was to tough him with right hands. And 154 was Hearns best weight. His chin was suspect at 147 because he was dropping to much weigh and it was suspect at 160 because he was to small for Hagler at the time. But 154 he was untouchable.
Wtf? Do you seriously believe that was McCallum full on? I suggest you go look at Mike's fights, before he was almost 40 and Jones finally found the guts to fight him.
Andy McBride I don't need to go back and look at anything. I've seen McCallum at his best. Ringside. What I am saying is that a guy who got rocked By Curry and McCrory and Jackson who were all right hand bombers would have certainly had a problem with one of the biggest right hand bombers of all time. Of course I know McCallum is not full on but it hurt Hearns more not being full on because he was a classic one two puncher so it hurt him more.
Yeah and what did Mike do to those guys? There was good reason Steward wouldn't let his cash cow fight McCallum, because he knew Tommy couldn't stop him. One shot like Mike hit Jackson or Curry with, and its goodnight Mr Hearns.
revprince2 I take aboard all your points, some very valid points there. I agree that Hearns was formidable at 154 but so was McCallum. I believe that McCallum would have worn down Duran and either stopped him in 12-13 rounds or won a close decision. Obviously Steward knew this and maneuvered Hearns into the fight instead, making big money for the both of them. Styles make fights, of course. Hearns made light work of Duran, while McCallum would likely have worked hard to break Duran. However, McCallum was very tough and clever, as you know since you claim to have seen him up close. I don't want to say that McCallum would have won but if anyone (besides Hagler) was capable of eating that big Hearns right hand, it was McCallum. You note that Hearns did not pull the trigger in this session...well, neither did McCallum. It's too bad they didn't have a unification fight before Hearns moved up for good
+Andy McBride mc callum fought 2 good fighters toney and calambay and lost 4 times,dont put him in the same league as hearns,let alone hagler or leonard!!come on now!!he is big mouthing now after 30 years that hagler was afraid to fight him,hagler would beat him up in all 4 corners of the ring
Would've LOVED to see a Hearns-v-McCallum matchup circa '87 to '91 or so. (Though they weren't quite syncing up in weight at the time.) It would've been a helluva fight. Punching power on a scale of 1-10: Tommy at 10, Mike at 8. Ability to TAKE a punch: Mike at 10, Tommy at 5. Speed: Tommy at 9 or 10, Mike at 7 or maybe 8. Defense: Mike at 9 or 10, Tommy at maybe 6. Stamina: Tommy at 6 or--at his best--7, Mike at 8 or 9. Ring smarts: Mike at 11 ("Ours goes to 11"), Tommy at 6 or 7. Mike never faced anyone with Tommy's punching power (except maybe, maybe Julian Jackson), and Tommy never faced anyone with Mike's body-punching ability. (The way Mike would go at guys' hips!)
Tommy beat the crap out of Sugar Ray for thirteen rounds. You might want to rethink some of your ratings. The only thing ever questionable on Tommy was his chin and that was because of the height to weight ratio.
It would be a super close fight...with Mccallum paying a heavy price in the first half but Hearns feeling the effects of the bodywork nearing the end... championship rounds.Close but I give the nod to Tommy.
McCallum reminds me of a Hopkins kind a fighter. Very, very, strong physically. But I think Hearns would of had the edge on this one. Hearns did very well with fighters who paced themselves like this, check Virgil Hill, Benitez and start of SRL fight.
From 2:02 to 2:16 that technical poetry.Today boxer's dont know how to motion like that a good jab by thomas herns a clever distance from mike but watch both men ultilize their jabs even though it sparring the 70s breed diffrent animals compare to now. Canelo alvarez and spence, terence crawford from this generation is closest thing, but the oldshcool guys were build different 1930s to early 1990s when boxing was something else now MMA is shining not to much talents in boxing to progress but i still love boxing.
I remember that Don Curry got through to McCallum's chin with a few right hands - can't help thinking Hearns would have done the same with fight-ending consequences...
Possibly two of the greatest junior middleweights ever. This fight should have happened for real, but at least this sparring session was caught on video!
Amazing fighters, i love Tommy but McCallum was a different beast! Way to technical, if they fought McCallum would have broke him down and stopped him.
This was a sparring session guys not a real fight. Your're just working out your kinks. Sambu Kalambay beat mike Mccallum decidesily the first fight; Mccallum won a split decision second which if 100 people watch the fight 51 will say macallum won and 49 will say Kalambay won.
More than right hand power, Tommys jab and length give anyone from 160 and down issues. Mike was indeed the body snatcher but he'd have to pay a price to get there. Did he have the money (chin, stamina, intellect)? That question would determine the winner.
2 greats, but only one seemed to get the full recognition. True fans know how good McCallum was 👏👏
Agreed.
True fact
Exactly Paul, when I was about late teens I started to get KO magazine monthly from the Newsagents in the late 80s and to say that they underrated McCallum wouldn't be even close. They never spoke about him or had him even higher than no 3 when he was a junior middleweight. I never understood that because at the time he had good wins against the frighteningly good hitter Julian Jackson and Donald Curry who had come back well and looked his old self after losing at welter to Honeyghan 18 months earlier. Reg Gutteridge called him "The great Mike McCallum" before one of his bouts. Only the likes of James Toney and Roy Jones could lick him on points. I think he had a draw against Sumbu kalambay and one against Toney I'd have to check but no doubt Mike McCallum was a great fighter. I remember him knocking out Michael Watson too who was a good solid compact middleweight with massive heart and solid defence. He boxed evenly with Herol Graham in a close bout too and Herol who was flawed in some regards wasn't easy to box against but Mike managed it. He was a patient solid Jr middle and middleweight. I think towards the end didn't he fight above middle too? May have fought Jones and Toney at super middle or Jones at middle and Toney at super middle? I'd have to double check was such a long time ago.
Dead right Paul Anthony, the toney fights were classics as well. The boxing ability from both sides was sublime. Great against Jeff harding too and even Roy Jones you could see the respect he had for McCallum. We know the American press seem to big up their own fighters and disregard others but that's no matter, good is good and anyone with the knowledge could see how good the man was . Good to converse with somebody who knows the game, thanks brother 👍👍
@@paulanthony5274 He lost to Sumbu in their first by UD or MD and won the rematch by SD. Sumbu is also criminally underrated and unfairly remembered only by the surprising first round ko loss to Michael Nunn.
Hearns jab is so quick and has great snap to it. DAMN!!
How Tommy could uncoil that right a sight to behold! And no-one since The Body Snatcher goes downstairs like Mike! Treasures the two of them
Two masters working their craft
its like someone took larry holmes' arms and put them on a welterweight lol
Larry Holmes jab and Joe Louis right hand.
The only reason this post has so few comments in so many years is because only real fans, who know boxing, came to watch this. Pure gold.
I think Hearns' jab is my favorite thing in boxing
Mars Red Agreed✊. His flicker jab is was the most beautiful thing in boxing. KRONK.
@@discowolf25 look at jab by Lennox Lewis
@@discowolf25 anyway Hearns is the big champ
Andriy Pavelko Lewis’ jab also one of the most beautiful things in boxing. He popped off it like it was nothing. Meant no disrespect champ✊.
Andriy Pavelko where you box outta?
Real boxing fans knows this is gold.
Two of the baddest dudes ever. Thanks for the upload.
The Hitman vs The Body Snatcher
Sounds like an old school Mob fued
KRONK legends
I saw some old footage of Hearns sparring Breland from back in the day and it looked like a Kung fu match because they had a ton of similarities.
To see these two legends in the ring together is a real treat.
Tommy was soo fast! McCallum was so crafty. Good sparring right here
Yes, great sparring.
Toney and McClellan sparring is in here too.
Always great sparring with steward in charge
Now this is the classic respectful art of " Sparring " . Compared to the present day sparring sessions with the pros. Today the sparring sessions are so disrespectful to the Queensbuiry sparring rules, present day, they try to take your head off instead off working and fixing flaws to advance their craft of the sweet science of boxing.
@@hanks5379 Man I am so sick of old-heads always tryna to shit on our generation
I LOVE FLOYD....BU HE WOULDNT BE ABLE TO HANDLE HEARNS....TOO FAST TOO POWERFUL....TOO DETROIT
+KING JAY But would Hearns been able to deal with the body pressure McCallum?
Stop WITH THE BULLSHIT!! FLOYD WOULD EAT THIS SHIT UP!!!!!
I think Mike showed against Jackson he could take the power punches and continue on and beat you, I think he beats Hearns in a great fight, at JWM, Floyd has not shot against either one, Leonard also beats him there, as does Terry norris, who also could box, was fast and had an awesome left hook.
+MrSlowPaper never saw anybody EAT what tommy served out lmao you must be around 14-15 years old
Agreed!
McCallum,the most underrated fighter of all times...
Pure skills.
Underrated by who
Watching Tommys flick jab is like a cobra strike it’s prey, so quick the eye can’t see it..Masterful boxers, and 2 of my all time favourites. It would be an honour to meet them one day. I could watch this all day.🥊
Mike mcallum, the fighter that many great fighters successful avoided throughout their careers just to look good,hail the jamaican mike mcallum.
These two masters display such incredible skills, with a huge respect and control to each other’s. They never hit with mean intention, but still, I’m amazed by this amazing demonstration.
Never knew this video existed, These guys were Great!! Loved Hearns GREAT Left Jab!! Thanks for posting!
@ 4:58 hearns whole attitude change a bit after that left hook,(making sounds and smiling).Mccallum is a kind of fighter to catch up to you in a 12rd fight . Guessing manny saw a pattern developing and did not approve ...
Agree 100% …jab, left hook followed by a right hand
The "Body Snatcher" was one of the most technical old school fighters out there . I had a youngster out here today just getting into the sport,( I'm telling him or her to just study Mike McCullen fights ,especially via "Donald Curry "& "Julian Jackson".
BodySnatcher was a great fighter.
Vaya dos genios, este video debería ponerse como ejemplo en cualquier escuela de boxeo
Still don't think people truly understand or realise just how great McCallum was
That's true. Unfortunately, some that came along later only got to see him fight when he was up in age and past his prime years, even then , he was still no pushover
That's really ,really high level boxing right there . absolutely beautiful to watch
i enjoyed this more than most pro fights nowadays. quality work from both men, deep skills on show. have you seen the toney - mcclellan sparring video? that's mesmerising too.
Hearns was faster than McCallum and he hit much harder when he was delivering single full power punches. But McCallum was a much more rounded fighter and he was much better on the inside than Hearns.
Hearns biggest problems were his durability and his stamina - two areas where McCallum was excellent. Hearns didn't have a glass chin but he was one of those guys who when they get hurt they lose their composure and technique and they get sloppy.
If they fought It would either be Hearns inside 3 rounds or McCallum with a 9-12th round stoppage.
Hearns inside three minutes against McCallum, really? I mean this man fought all the killers but was never knocked out. The likes of Julian Jackson, Jam😢Toney, Roy Jones, Steve Collins . He was never knocked down, the four kings didn't want to get in a ring with him for a reason.
Then again mccallum fought hard hitters and was never dazed. I see mccallum getting the better of hearns. He was avoided for a reason. Even in his late 30s the man was a killer. The moment someone closed hearns distances it was almost always over. Even Barkley got to him.
I watched them Spar at Cobo Hall... in 1986..both were complete fighters
Sparring is sparring it does not entirely reflect how an actual bout would progress, having said that, what is clearly apparent, is that Tommy had a much faster and all-round superior jab than Mike and in an actual fight Tommy would utilise his superbly disguised laser like right hand.
maz hussain That jab was "Cobra" like.
Indeed.
Tommy's jab was his best asset but his inability to take a huge punch and Mccallum's body work and amazing stamina would have won him the fight in the later rounds imo. There is no doubt in my mind he would have knocked out Tommy.
Tommy Hearns jab has the fastest jab Ive ever seen 😳
McCallum is probably the most complete and skilled fighter i've ever seen. He had it all: Excellent jab, inside game, brutal body attack, master defense, very high ring IQ, granite chin, stamina, footwork, accuracy, timing, no waste of energy... On the other hand, Hearns got more power, speed and reach than McCallum. But that's it. In every other department Mike was clearly better.
Hearns would attack McCallum with a barrage of brutal punches but Mike would dodge almost every punch. Tommy tend to be over anxious in big fights and he used to let himself wide open when attacking, then Mike would counter punch him to death and also slow him down progressively with body shots. Hearns chin was allways suspect and his stamina was poor mostly because of his over anxiety when attacking in the earlier rounds. All of these factors would lead into McCallum TKO'ing Hearns in the mid/late rounds
😐
Hearns had a much better jab. And in these weights - hearns moved much better as well. Add that he could fight of the back foot - mike couldnt. To me that makes tommy more diverse. Ill just add that i think mike wins h2h.
@@eranliber5993 you should go and watch Mike McCallum as you obviously don’t know anything at all lol. Never catch Mike getting tired down the stretch or getting Ko’d cold in his prime. Pure boxing pugilist. Furthermore, hearns named him the body snatcher, and also hearns and manny didn’t wanna fight him . Either did Ray he beat rays bro in the amateurs. And the way he broke down Julian Jackson countering with body shots. Mike came up the hard way! 🇯🇲
@@thefootballandboxingchanne2357 i did see a decent portion of his fights that i could find. And i love mccallum. EXTREMELY UNDERRATED.
what i wrote is just my feeling in a h2h match.
Tommy imo had the best jab in the lower divisions, especially back in his day. Tommy also moved very good (mike also) but hearns was quicker. as for conditioning? Absolutely right. Hearns could be gassed out when didnt fight the right fight and it was possible.
Btw - i heard that tommy ducked mccallum - and i cant say or validate anything. But i guess many top guys did. Sure, mike was a prime boxer - but unlike hearns, hagler, duran and leonard - he didnt bring big numbers, money and exposure so it felt like a lose-lose situation to put your title in the line and gaining very little from it. Dont get me wrong - i absolutely think the best should fight the best, and tommy and mike @154 wouldve been epic, but i guess when your title in the line and big money comes into play - words speak louder than actions. Anyway - BIG respect for mike. His 1st fight against toney remains one of my absolute favorites.
@@eranliber5993 hearns outboxes mc callum. The spots mc callum was most dangerous hearns wouldn’t give him. Unless the gas tank like said.And I like mc callum more than hearns .more complete .
Mike McCullen is nothing to sleep on the guy is Technical and he learn from some of the best trainers of that era
McCallum
Never heard of this Mike Mccullen fella that is A technical wiz. I do know about Mike McCallum , who was A master boxer.
This is beautiful stuff! You can see elements of both mens greatest skills. Tommy's dominance from outside and Mikes owning inside game. Great watch for students of the game!
Thanks for sharing , brilliant footage .
Seeing two future HOF fighters spar back in the day is GOLD. I wish I could have watched what was taped at the KRONK gym back in the day. Both guys did great things in the ring which made the sport great back in the 80's and 90's. I sent a letter to the Kronk gym back in 1982 begging for a pic of Tommy Hearns and a few weeks later it arrived. Still have the envelope to this day. Love old school stuff Best ime of Boxing no doubt.
classic footage!
Boy what a great fight this would have been. Love Tommy, but I gotta go with the body snatcher. After seeing McCallum destroy Julian Jackson, who was as big a puncher as anybody, I have no doubt he could handle Tommy's power. The x-factor in this fight is Tommy's chin, which seemed to betray him in big fights. I see Hearns leading on points by around round 5 or 6, and then McCallum catching him. The Body Snatcher by TKO, round 7.
Julian is not in the same convo as Hearns.Julian rushed his shots and didn’t set anything up
Jackson wasn't the fighter tommy was. Yeah ge had power. But he didn't have the ring IQ, precision, and speed as tommy. Plus i doubt he punched significantly harder than Tommy. His hooks were powerfy, but Tommy's straights were. Plus his hooks had pop too. Cang compare Jackson to the HITMAN
@@jabrielwhite17 I agree on all accounts
But Hearns is all over him and not even trying??
The problem with that comparison is that it doesn’t take into account the fact that Hearns is far better than Jackson in every other aspect apart from power (where he’s merely equal).
Can you imagine the bodysnatcher n hearns sparring what a site to have seen science at its best
Maan this is a wet dream come true! this must gave been ´83 or ´84 mccallum left steward and kronk after hearns fought duran in ´84, hearns is so smooth in there this really was his peak between ´82-´86 he looked so sharp.
yea hearns was the man. that f'n jab is ridiculous
McCallum was probably only man who would have chance to outbox Hearns. All others had to brawl to beat him.
you're right that Mike could probably outbox Tommy, but I'm not too sure Mike would have chosen to try to outbox him I'm a real bout. instead he would have timed the hell out of Tommy to the body, taken away his legs and ko'd him late. I'd go with Mike in a battle of attrition
Carlos Rosa It's a tough call. Most people judge Tommy onhis two biggest fights. First one with Leonard and with Hagler. Lot of people forget that he was indisposed in both fights. Overtrained for Leonard and broken right hand in fight with Hagler among other things. Biggest weaknes was his chin but that I think was a result of that hard knockout from Hagler. The closest they've been to fight each other was before Duran Hearns when they both had Mike as mandatory. Hearns was in his prime and if he came in fight with Mike in a same condition (which is something you couldn't rely on with Tommy) I think it would be very hard night for Bodysnatcher.
TzFrank Hagler had better reach than McCallum.
TzFrank Hagler could box and brawl. Hagler could fight on inside and outside. And he could go to the body very good too. Yeah he was slower but he was also harder puncher and his skills were very good too. Don't forget he's one of the best switch hitters ever. I see it 50:50.
+Marti Nek WOW! first time iv seen this,what year was it?
Reply
Tommy's footwork was a thing of beauty. He moves around the ring as if he's wearing ice skates.
McCallum le da cátedras a Hearns. Hearns es bueno y aún así McCallum lo asedia, acorrala, lleva contra las cuerdas, y después le deja trabajar, se mantiene humilde
That jab of Hearns is AMAZING!
Carlos Castro most beautiful jab in the history of the sport. That flicker.
Beautiful. They look so relaxed and focused at the same time. Every move is natural, every step is the right one. Sweet Science at its best, and this is just a sparring session. Imagine how a real fight between them would have been...
People say the great 4… but really there were the great 5. A Hagler vs McCallum fight would have been a war.
He is a living legend.greatest fighters in any era..
i think mccalum all day!
A fight between these two would’ve been amazing. I can see MCcallum beating hearns like he did with Julian Jackson.
I think that McCallum could have beaten Hearns (I don't know that he WOULD have beaten him, but he definitely COULD have). I don't think it would have been like the Jackson fight, though. Jackson's power was maybe, maybe, maybe comparable to Hearns's, but he was nowhere near as quick and skilled as Tommy. (Hearns and Jackson had--unfortunately--similar jaws, though.)
That's bullshit!
I think you are right. Mike would have been there the whole way and if Tommy couldn't get you out of there, he seem to run into problems.
This wasn't sparring. This was war.
Two high level technicians going at it! Beautiful to see.
Omg ur the greatest man in the world for posting this, my favorite fighter ever
The more I see of mccallum the better he gets. Underated to some extent
Only people who say that he's underrated are actually the ones who underrate him, he was always a great boxer and always have the respect of the boxing world,
For anyone who thinks McCallum got the better of Hearns in this, you need to consider this Hearns has clearly been instructed to hold his big right hand back and I know this because I speak from experience. I was an amateur national champion in Houston and I was a skinny 6 foot tall lightweight with a booming right hand like Hearns. I can remember every time I got into the ring to spar with someone, that fighters trainer would yell across the ring to my trainer before the sparing session began. "tell him to hold that right hand" they would say. In other words tell your fighter to hold up on throwing his most powerful punch or if he throws it tell him to throw it soft. Now look at this and tell me how many right hands Hearns throws, none just jabs and hooks. At3:30 he throws one but clearly pulls it. NOW go back and look at McCallum fights against McCrory, Curry and Toney to see how easy it was to tough him with right hands. And 154 was Hearns best weight. His chin was suspect at 147 because he was dropping to much weigh and it was suspect at 160 because he was to small for Hagler at the time. But 154 he was untouchable.
Wtf? Do you seriously believe that was McCallum full on? I suggest you go look at Mike's fights, before he was almost 40 and Jones finally found the guts to fight him.
Andy McBride I don't need to go back and look at anything. I've seen McCallum at his best. Ringside. What I am saying is that a guy who got rocked By Curry and McCrory and Jackson who were all right hand bombers would have certainly had a problem with one of the biggest right hand bombers of all time. Of course I know McCallum is not full on but it hurt Hearns more not being full on because he was a classic one two puncher so it hurt him more.
Yeah and what did Mike do to those guys? There was good reason Steward wouldn't let his cash cow fight McCallum, because he knew Tommy couldn't stop him. One shot like Mike hit Jackson or Curry with, and its goodnight Mr Hearns.
revprince2 I take aboard all your points, some very valid points there. I agree that Hearns was formidable at 154 but so was McCallum. I believe that McCallum would have worn down Duran and either stopped him in 12-13 rounds or won a close decision. Obviously Steward knew this and maneuvered Hearns into the fight instead, making big money for the both of them. Styles make fights, of course. Hearns made light work of Duran, while McCallum would likely have worked hard to break Duran. However, McCallum was very tough and clever, as you know since you claim to have seen him up close. I don't want to say that McCallum would have won but if anyone (besides Hagler) was capable of eating that big Hearns right hand, it was McCallum. You note that Hearns did not pull the trigger in this session...well, neither did McCallum. It's too bad they didn't have a unification fight before Hearns moved up for good
+Andy McBride mc callum fought 2 good fighters toney and calambay and lost 4 times,dont put him in the same league as hearns,let alone hagler or leonard!!come on now!!he is big mouthing now after 30 years that hagler was afraid to fight him,hagler would beat him up in all 4 corners of the ring
That would have been some fight, Hearns v McCallum at 154!
The Body Snatcher 🇯🇲🇯🇲🇯🇲
Severely underrated and underused
The most dodged fighter of his generation.
Tommy was not only incredibly fast, but he had such a good reach. Damn
1:16 look at how fast tommy's jab was! thats insane
Would've LOVED to see a Hearns-v-McCallum matchup circa '87 to '91 or so. (Though they weren't quite syncing up in weight at the time.) It would've been a helluva fight. Punching power on a scale of 1-10: Tommy at 10, Mike at 8. Ability to TAKE a punch: Mike at 10, Tommy at 5. Speed: Tommy at 9 or 10, Mike at 7 or maybe 8. Defense: Mike at 9 or 10, Tommy at maybe 6. Stamina: Tommy at 6 or--at his best--7, Mike at 8 or 9. Ring smarts: Mike at 11 ("Ours goes to 11"), Tommy at 6 or 7. Mike never faced anyone with Tommy's punching power (except maybe, maybe Julian Jackson), and Tommy never faced anyone with Mike's body-punching ability. (The way Mike would go at guys' hips!)
Tommy beat the crap out of Sugar Ray for thirteen rounds. You might want to rethink some of your ratings. The only thing ever questionable on Tommy was his chin and that was because of the height to weight ratio.
It would be a super close fight...with Mccallum paying a heavy price in the first half but Hearns feeling the effects of the bodywork nearing the end... championship rounds.Close but I give the nod to Tommy.
McCallum will feel the effects of Hearns’ bodywork too, which is actually more damaging than McCallum’s
Whenever i'm sparring i always try to picture that Hearns jab in my head.
I take Mike over Hearns. There is no hole in Mike's game. He was a Jamaican who never received the proper support.
Tommy’s jab at 1:10 was lighting
Hearns jabbing while moving off the back foot then counter with left hook @ about 4:09. Love that.
BEAUTFUL BOXING!
McCallum is relentless. Indomitable.
Tommy too smooth. I love them both, but I give the edge to Tommy. Two legends. Thanks for posting.
Hearns was a fucking freak, I would be scared to box him
Que nenes . Que lindo material. 💪🏼
Very nice. Thank you for sharing this
That combo at 2:14 by McCallum 🙌🏼
I'm pretty sure they wearing each others shirts.. the tall guy is g man..
McCallum reminds me of a Hopkins kind a fighter. Very, very, strong physically. But I think Hearns would of had the edge on this one. Hearns did very well with fighters who paced themselves like this, check Virgil Hill, Benitez and start of SRL fight.
So great! The best fighters!
It's only when Hearns is facing a HOFer like McCallum that you fully realize how unique his jab was. It is the perfect boxing weapon.
From 2:02 to 2:16 that technical poetry.Today boxer's dont know how to motion like that a good jab by thomas herns a clever distance from mike but watch both men ultilize their jabs even though it sparring the 70s breed diffrent animals compare to now. Canelo alvarez and spence, terence crawford from this generation is closest thing, but the oldshcool guys were build different 1930s to early 1990s when boxing was something else now MMA is shining not to much talents in boxing to progress but i still love boxing.
Hearns was just amazing. I counted 6 right hands he threw in this and he landed every one against a legend. He didn't turn into any of them either.
1:07 they both moved so fast they ended up missing
I remember that Don Curry got through to McCallum's chin with a few right hands - can't help thinking Hearns would have done the same with fight-ending consequences...
100% correct, After re-watching the curry fight, there is no question that Hearns would’ve ended this fantasy match up within three rounds.
@@stevef3453 Mike won that fight though. If Don Curry, Julian Jackson and James Toney couldn’t finish Mike, no one could
@@CommKommando Facts
This is Gold!
Best jab in the business v the best best body snatcher
Wow thanks for the upload! More please!. Maybe two best light middles ever. Anyone know what year it is?
Possibly two of the greatest junior middleweights ever. This fight should have happened for real, but at least this sparring session was caught on video!
Always wondered what their sparring sessions were like. No wonder they never fought. Tommy had too much to lose and he was not sure he would have won
Tommy clearly got the better of this session.
@@mowglie628 Cannot agree. Nott what my eyes saw
@@raeferwilson2599 I’m glad you’re not a judge then.
@@mowglie628 Glad YOU'RE not
@@raeferwilson2599 Nice comeback.
This some good bump right here!
The Body Snatcher 👍🏻👍🏻
Damn Hearns is quick with all his punches. McCallum using good timing to keep up.
Thomas hearns had *the best jab* in boxing history.
And *one of the deadliest* right hand ever.
Amazing fighters, i love Tommy but McCallum was a different beast! Way to technical, if they fought McCallum would have broke him down and stopped him.
This was a sparring session guys not a real fight. Your're just working out your kinks. Sambu Kalambay beat mike Mccallum decidesily the first fight; Mccallum won a split decision second which if 100 people watch the fight 51 will say macallum won and 49 will say Kalambay won.
damn hearns jab was fast as fuck!
That Motor City Cobra jab ...
Well I lose interest in boxing for five years and come back to see youtube full of theselost gems hearns v McCallum and breland
Using mostly the jab as main offense, feinting, touching, head movement this is a intelligent sword fight
As good as it gets. Two master boxers
golden footage
Che match sarebbe stato!! Peccato che fossero della medesima scuderia,ci hanno privato di un incontro di prima grandezza!!
More than right hand power, Tommys jab and length give anyone from 160 and down issues. Mike was indeed the body snatcher but he'd have to pay a price to get there. Did he have the money (chin, stamina, intellect)? That question would determine the winner.
McCallum had blood burst in his head thats why he kept winking those hurt too.
MM was a great fighter!!
Hearn jab is something
I would’ve like to see mccallum in with the fab 4, certainly could have seen some great moments. Any idea what fight this was training for?
Hagler. Body snatcher was elite. The Marvelous one was a level above.
I like them both, but I think Mike was more complete as a boxer.
He was.
Does anyone knows the year of this sparring? Maybe 1984, in theese years mike was light middleweight and worked with manny steward