Bf 110 Zerstorer

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 28 вер 2024
  • As the world transitioned from biplane to monoplane, many new developments propelled aviation forward, and Hermann Göring himself fantasized with the idea of a fleet of brand new Zerstörers, or destroyers, that could take over the enemies of the Reich.
    A revolutionary aircraft concept was then born in the form of a heavy fighter destroyer, a vehicle that was compared to an impenetrable fortress back in the day.
    The Messerschmitt Bf 110 came out victorious after a hard-fought competition, primarily because of its long-range and stout airframe capable of penetrating the opponents' air defenses and protecting bombers along the way.
    However, its design also showed several shortcomings, and it is rumored that it ultimately won because of a petty fight between aviation leaders and the desire to embarrass Messerschmitt.
    Still, this powerful destroyer would eventually become one of the most emblematic aircraft out of Nazi Germany, and it would take the Royal Air Force almost a year to figure out the secret weapon behind an aircraft that was shooting down all of its tail gunners...
    ---
    Join Dark Skies as we explore the world of aviation with cinematic short documentaries featuring the biggest and fastest airplanes ever built, top-secret military projects, and classified missions with hidden untold true stories. Including US, German, and Soviet warplanes, along with aircraft developments that took place during World War I, World War 2, the Korean War, the Vietnam War, the Cold War, the Gulf War, and special operations mission in between.
    As images and footage of actual events are not always available, Dark Skies sometimes utilizes similar historical images and footage for dramatic effect and soundtracks for emotional impact. We do our best to keep it as visually accurate as possible.
    All content on Dark Skies is researched, produced, and presented in historical context for educational purposes. We are history enthusiasts and are not always experts in some areas, so please don't hesitate to reach out to us with corrections, additional information, or new ideas.

КОМЕНТАРІ • 297

  • @joebfnl1079
    @joebfnl1079 2 роки тому +71

    Little known fact. The Bf 110 as a night fighter, one pilot achieved 121 kills!. A record that still stands today!!!.

    • @CorePathway
      @CorePathway 2 роки тому +11

      Dozens of German WWII ace totals will never be approached.

    • @SteveBrownRocks2023
      @SteveBrownRocks2023 Рік тому +1

      Prince Heinrich zu von Wittgenstein? 🤔

    • @Joop.23-2-63
      @Joop.23-2-63 7 місяців тому +3

      ​@@SteveBrownRocks2023
      Heinz-Wolfgang Schnaufer

    • @SteveBrownRocks2023
      @SteveBrownRocks2023 7 місяців тому

      @@Joop.23-2-63 😎👍🏽 Danke!

    • @stacyhamilton2619
      @stacyhamilton2619 6 місяців тому +2

      Known fact: your 2nd sentence is a ridiculous D- construction.

  • @g2macs
    @g2macs 2 роки тому +19

    Often said but true, the greatest asset to the Allies and the war being relatively short, was the incompetence of Goering and his basic misunderstanding of modern air warfare.

    • @destroyerarmor2846
      @destroyerarmor2846 2 роки тому

      Incompetent bad guys

    • @OuterHeaven210
      @OuterHeaven210 2 роки тому +2

      Yeah my boss is always making my job hard too. Should nickname him Goering.

    • @billpetersen298
      @billpetersen298 2 роки тому +1

      1939-45 is long enough.

    • @letoubib21
      @letoubib21 2 роки тому

      @@billpetersen298 More than long enough *. . .*

  • @jfdavis668
    @jfdavis668 2 роки тому +62

    The original concept of a heavy escort fighter was a good one, it was radar that doomed it. German fast bombers and the ME110 escorts would enter the target countries air space at altitude, and only be detected visually. Interceptors would then take off to stop them, and the 110s would dive to attack them. They could then zoom climb or dive away, but they have prevented the interceptors from reaching the bombers, who drop their loads on target and speed away. Worked in Poland and France. But in England, they knew they were coming via radar and the interceptors would be at altitude by the time the 110s arrived. Now the advantage is with the single engine fighters, and the 110s couldn't perform their intended role.

    • @TheArgieH
      @TheArgieH 2 роки тому +9

      Wind forward a few years and the radar equipped Bf 110 night fighters lay in wait for the RAF heavy bomber streams. Even worse, the RAF's then navigation radar acted like a beacon for the night fighters receivers. Enter the Mosquito NF escort, with its own radar (a lot better than German thanks to the cavity magnetron giving millimetric wavelengths) plus its own cannon and mgs. Evened things up more than a bit - allegedly.

    • @allangibson2408
      @allangibson2408 2 роки тому +1

      @@TheArgieH The advantage of the cavity magnetron was shear power. It was a step from a few watts to kilowatts.
      That means the range increases from twenty kilometres to two hundred kilometres with the same quality receiver.

    • @RemusKingOfRome
      @RemusKingOfRome 2 роки тому

      Why weren't these heavy fighters designed with adequate rear gunnery ?Surely they would have known fighters would get on their tails. We know German engineers could develop gun pods ... so why not 2 x 20mm cannons in a upper pod and 2 more in a lower pod, both could be rotated front or rear. I's love to see a spit on the tail of such a fighter, facing a rain of 20mm shells .. :D

    • @matthiasmay1977
      @matthiasmay1977 2 роки тому +2

      @@RemusKingOfRome
      It was faster than the Hawker Hurricane let alone a Gloster Gladiator. It was believed that the Bf110 could simply outrun enemy fighters. Indeed it did just that.
      The rear gunner was more an radio operator and observer with a gun than a dedicated gunner.
      The Mosquito also didn't have a tail gunner for the same reason.

    • @qball1of1
      @qball1of1 2 роки тому +1

      @@RemusKingOfRome Germany never offered proper defensive armament on its aircraft, why this doctrine was popular who knows. The 110 should have had as a minimum a 13mm heavy mg...still not ideal but much better than the 7.92 used.

  • @flavirostris1972
    @flavirostris1972 Рік тому +4

    Absolute beaut of an aircraft, if somewhat flawed in operation. One of the most aesthetically pleasing planes of WW2

  • @greebo6549
    @greebo6549 2 роки тому +46

    Despite its shortcomings, the BF110 is a lovely looking plane

  • @JeremySpencerJJWS
    @JeremySpencerJJWS 2 роки тому +31

    I think he meant Royal Air Force at the end there. The Royal Navy had their own problems with Condors and submarines.

    • @decam5329
      @decam5329 2 роки тому +5

      I like this channel, but it's lazy mistakes like this that make me dispair.

    • @matthiasmay1977
      @matthiasmay1977 2 роки тому +1

      Early to in the war the Bf110 successfully prevented British bombers to bomb the German Navy. The Bf110 intercepted the incoming Wellingtons over the bay of Germany and shot them down.
      Having air superiority and combined with the Stuka precision bombing the Luftwaffe could indeed protect the Kriegsmarine. The royal navy had to stay away from German shores.

    • @tompiper9276
      @tompiper9276 2 роки тому +1

      @@matthiasmay1977 The Bay of Germany...??... Where is that???

    • @matthiasmay1977
      @matthiasmay1977 2 роки тому

      @@tompiper9276
      Sorry für the mistranslation. In English it is called Heligoland Bight or German Bight.
      Battle of the Heligoland Bight
      18 December 1939.
      This early air battle made clear that unescorted daylight bombing was not a good idea. Before many thought that the bombers will always come through.
      In the early years the Bf110 where very effective against any bomber.
      Allied navies and air forces could not stop the Germans from invading Denmark, Norway, The Netherlands, Belgium and France.
      Especially in case of Norway the deficiencies of the Royal Navy came to light. And is was up to the RAF to save Britain.

    • @tompiper9276
      @tompiper9276 2 роки тому +1

      @@matthiasmay1977 Got it, just never heard it called that before.

  • @Idahoguy10157
    @Idahoguy10157 2 роки тому +16

    If Captain Eric “Winkle” Brown RN says something about an aircraft, don’t discount it!

    • @Wookie120
      @Wookie120 2 роки тому +6

      One of the 110's biggest weak points was that it was underpowered according to Capt. Brown. I have read his book Wings of the Luftwaffe many times.

  • @martindice5424
    @martindice5424 2 роки тому +11

    Firstly, the cavity magnetron was invented in the UK.
    Secondly, the incredulity of the RAF toward the concept of shrage musik was rather strange since the Royal Flying Corps had developed exactly the same concept for downing German bombers in The Great War.
    Strange how things get forgotten.

    • @jonathanklein383
      @jonathanklein383 2 роки тому +3

      But it wasn't forgotten. Even in 1940 the Defiant was using its gun turret to good effect as a stopgap night fighter... often firing up! Not sure the RAF was incredulous so much as simply lacking a counter.

    • @martindice5424
      @martindice5424 2 роки тому

      Good point sir.
      Another plus for the maligned Defiant! 👍👍

  • @thepunkyparrot9042
    @thepunkyparrot9042 2 роки тому +4

    Man, I could watch these Dark Docs/Skies whatever goes after the word Dark, videos all day and not complain once I wasn't productive.

  • @shauny2285
    @shauny2285 2 роки тому +13

    I think he puts in mistakes to see if we are awake.

  • @OuterHeaven210
    @OuterHeaven210 2 роки тому +5

    It's a great daytime attacker too. As long as you have air superiority.

  • @WildBillCox13
    @WildBillCox13 2 роки тому +3

    Italia, Deutschland, Great Britain, Japan, the USA, and the CCCP pursued more or less individual research on RaDAR detection and range finding/position marking throughout the late 1930s and early '40s. Technical advances were continuous, but apprehension varied depending on which nation. According to Drach and Doctor Clarke, it was USA/UK RaDAR range/direction finding and target illumination that revolutionalized naval combat. Both are somewhat disparaging of similar efforts from the Axis.

  • @sid2112
    @sid2112 2 роки тому

    I feel fortunate to have this channel to enjoy. Thanks man!

  • @keyboard_g
    @keyboard_g 2 роки тому +2

    Why is there a chapter called “Absolute Failure” when the entire second half of the video is about how good it was and hard to deal with?

  • @raypurchase801
    @raypurchase801 2 роки тому +2

    Thanks, Willy.
    The Me 110 provided great target practice for Mosquito interdictors.

    • @jamesricker3997
      @jamesricker3997 2 роки тому

      Let's not forget Willie also gave us the Bf-109, the aircraft that shortened the war by 6 months

    • @tompiper9276
      @tompiper9276 2 роки тому

      @@jamesricker3997 Not sure I get that. Please expand it.

    • @VincentvonHellgate
      @VincentvonHellgate 5 місяців тому

      @@tompiper9276 Don't worry about these comments , both of them are very foolish !!!!!!!!!

  • @JohnnyAFG81
    @JohnnyAFG81 2 роки тому +3

    Great historic video. Always on point.

  • @Mrgunsngear
    @Mrgunsngear 2 роки тому +1

    Thanks

  • @robbabcock_
    @robbabcock_ 2 роки тому +1

    Another great video! Thanks!

  • @TheRoybeasley
    @TheRoybeasley 2 роки тому +6

    A headache for the Royal Navy? Since when?

    • @Otokichi786
      @Otokichi786 2 роки тому +1

      Another "Dark Skies" flub.;)

  • @georgec2126
    @georgec2126 Рік тому

    Re the name of the plane, see also the Rammstein song 'Ich will ZERSTÖREN", meaning "I want to DESTROY." In their usual non-too -subtle style...

  • @michaeldrummond7590
    @michaeldrummond7590 2 роки тому +1

    Also pretty sure the P47 and P 38 were more than a match for the 110.

  • @N7BLW
    @N7BLW 2 роки тому +4

    The P 51 was not a fighter bomber. It was purely a fighter.

    • @roybennett9284
      @roybennett9284 2 роки тому

      Yes but like the harricane and spitfire it could b come what was required.

    • @toniberger6005
      @toniberger6005 2 роки тому +1

      @@roybennett9284 well the P51 did more groundattacking than airfighting in west europe... so would say it startet as "pure fighter" but quickly became a fighter bomber.

  • @robinraphael
    @robinraphael 2 роки тому

    5 minutes 11 seconds and you have footage was that pilot filming that by hand while trying to shoot the guy down because the camera moved think about that one it's pretty badass I never seen that before

  • @vsboy2577
    @vsboy2577 2 роки тому

    History is incredible

  • @longrider42
    @longrider42 2 роки тому +1

    I forgot a plane, that proved itself as a Twin Engine fighter bomber, and I'm not talking about the Mosquito. I am talking the Bristol Beaufighter. An Excellent twin engine two seat fighter/bomber/torpedo plane.

    • @roybennett9284
      @roybennett9284 2 роки тому

      Which also had reverse lend-lease feature when the yanks used them in North Africa and Italy.

  • @johnbarron4027
    @johnbarron4027 2 роки тому

    The BF 110 was a beautiful aircraft as many other questionable aircraft throughout the war were.

  • @anoni81b4u
    @anoni81b4u Рік тому

    Great video

  • @joerusso4219
    @joerusso4219 2 роки тому

    The ME-110 was like their version of the A-10 warthog.

  • @leestewart72
    @leestewart72 2 роки тому

    The BF-110 should have been a ground attack aircraft with the FW-187 as a heavy fighter/interceptor.

  • @flashcar60
    @flashcar60 2 роки тому

    Correction on one of your claims. The cavity magnetron was not based on German original designs. In 1939, Harry Boot and John Randall found a use for the magnetron tube invented by A. W. Hull, of the US, in 1929. They adapted the design, and found that it could generate a signal at 9.8 cm and 400 watts. The Germans were astonished when they discovered a resulting system on a downed British bomber.

  • @jp-ty1vd
    @jp-ty1vd 2 роки тому

    imo, the 110 should have been allocated as a CAS fighter/bomber as well as a night fighter.

  • @noelblack8159
    @noelblack8159 2 роки тому +1

    Ah, my favorite aircraft of all time :D

  • @darkknight1340
    @darkknight1340 2 роки тому

    "Kampfzerstörer" is bomber destroyer,fighter destroyer would be - "Jagdzerstörer."

  • @kellywright540
    @kellywright540 2 роки тому

    During the Battle of Britain, German ME110 pilot screaming at his rear gunner, "Keep those fighters off our tail! And could you please reload our 20mm cannon when you have time?!" 🤦‍♀️

  • @ssnydess6787
    @ssnydess6787 2 роки тому +1

    It was the predecessor to the very successful RAF mosquito concept, but never refined; it's follow aircraft was flawed as well.

    • @martinpepperell8424
      @martinpepperell8424 2 роки тому

      Nazi Germany surprisingly not THAT good at planes apart from it single engined fighters.

    • @tompiper9276
      @tompiper9276 2 роки тому

      Not really, this was a heavy fighter. The Mosquito was a fast bomber. So completely different.

  • @-CLUMSYDIYer-
    @-CLUMSYDIYer- 2 роки тому +1

    The royal navy or the royal airforce?

    • @letoubib21
      @letoubib21 2 роки тому

      Royal Naval Air Service *. . . ;-)*

  • @rob5944
    @rob5944 2 роки тому

    I suppose the concept of the heavy fighter could be compared to the naval destroyer that swept away torpedo boats that threatened battleships in the early twentieth century...

  • @smithy2389
    @smithy2389 2 роки тому

    How do you shoot down a tail gunner?

  • @coastlinesailingcruisingan3991
    @coastlinesailingcruisingan3991 2 роки тому

    I used to go Fishing in a big hole made by one of these that was shot down by Anti aircraft fire whist it was attacking Rolls Royce.

  • @Vermiliontea
    @Vermiliontea 2 роки тому +1

    A big, more capable, better armed, and longer range fighter, like the Bf 110, is a perfectly sound concept. But the key to if it's going to be employed successfully or not, is speed, not "maneuverability". As long as it's faster than the opposition, all is well. Even better is if it can climb better as well.
    The Bf 110 ran into that trap when it faced Hurricanes, P-40s and particularly Spitfires. I get the feeling Luftwaffe suffered from a bit of hubris early on and failed to perceive that the competition would toughen up. This also spills over to Willi Messerschmitt's own performance. When he designed the Bf 109, he went pretty all out on performance, with little compromise. When he designed the supposed successor, Bf 309, he fooled around with frivolous nonsense like pressurized cockpit and tricycle gear. Clearly, he was thinking in terms like the enemy was already left in the dust and unable to measure up. Same with Germany's failure to finance full development of the DB 603 engine.

  • @没有昵称-m8h
    @没有昵称-m8h 2 роки тому

  • @tesmith47
    @tesmith47 2 роки тому

    good

  • @timoakes450
    @timoakes450 2 роки тому

    In the late 30's Jazz was hugej]ly popular in Germany -many leading artistes cut German language discs -SO -OBLIQUE SOUNDS/ANGULAR MG121 HAHA -The Avro Lancaster had no ball/lower gun turrets-having a massive 14k bomb load-so NJG realised tht this was a weak point -ie attack from below/underneath-me110e njg had 2xmg12120mm rm auto cannons mountec to fire at an oblique angle(jazz!!) upward and forward -thus swher music-crept up underneath raf lancasters and shot them to helllll///

  • @matthewmoore5698
    @matthewmoore5698 Рік тому

    Better than the Boulton p d

  • @Treasureson78RPM
    @Treasureson78RPM 2 роки тому +1

    It was a great plane for sure but mostly misused during the early part of the war. It could have caused way more destruction. Probably the top twin engined fighter of the war after the P-38 Lighting and the P-61 Black Widow night fighter.

    • @VincentNajger1
      @VincentNajger1 2 роки тому +4

      What about the De Haviland Dh98 Mosquito?

    • @neilpemberton5523
      @neilpemberton5523 2 роки тому +3

      The Mosquito was much faster than the Me110.

    • @MartintheTinman
      @MartintheTinman 2 роки тому +3

      Mosquito was the number one twin engined aircraft of WWII

    • @scootergeorge9576
      @scootergeorge9576 2 роки тому +1

      @@MartintheTinman - But it was not specifically a fighter.

    • @MartintheTinman
      @MartintheTinman 2 роки тому +1

      @@scootergeorge9576 . There wàs a fighter version

  • @duncancargill6371
    @duncancargill6371 2 роки тому +1

    Learn your history mate, I realy like your work, but sometimes

  • @auro1986
    @auro1986 2 роки тому

    every world war 2 aircraft looks the same because you gave them all the same things years before the war started

  • @Poshypaws
    @Poshypaws 2 роки тому

    Schräge Musik

  • @carlguile2856
    @carlguile2856 2 роки тому

    Commentariat

  • @jonsouth1545
    @jonsouth1545 2 роки тому +1

    Yet another, badly researched video first the comments about the cavity magnetron are simply wrong. A magnetron is any tube that employs a magnetic field. The Cavity Magnetron was a completely different design from the pre-war German magnetrons operating on a completely different principle. As for the comment about the 110 being a headache for the Royal Navy that was pulled straight out of your ass and simply has no basis in reality. As for the "Americans" having air superiority over Europe, there were significantly more British and Canadian and other commonwealth fighter squadrons operating in Europe than American ones and did significantly more of work in regards to nullifying the 110s.

  • @anthonyw6730
    @anthonyw6730 2 роки тому +1

    Hey there Mr. DARK SKIES, not only the Royal Navy mentioned here towards the end of this clip is a big slip up, what is unforgivable is that in other episodes of Dark Skies, many a times you tried to snook us aviation enthusiasts by using a plane vastly different from the narrative. For example: The narrative was going on about a B24 Liberator being shot down by a German fighter but you cut & paste a B17 clip to depict the shoot down! PLEASE...... YOU ARE INSULTING THE INTELLIGENCE OF YOUR VIEWERS. Shame on you.
    Would I give you a LIKE? Hell No!

  • @pwmiles56
    @pwmiles56 2 роки тому +54

    6:45 The British cavity magnetron was an improvement on a German one. WHAT! No, magnetron is a generic term for a tube which employs a magnetic field. The 1940 Randall and Boot magnetron was the first cavity magnetron as such, and was quite different from any predecessor, being able to produce far higher power. The Germans eventually (1945) developed a magnetron radar (FuG 240 Berlin), based on a copy of the British magnetron

    • @proudsnowtiger
      @proudsnowtiger 2 роки тому +11

      Came here to say the same. There was a pre-war German magnetron, but it wasn't a cavity design and it didn't have the power of the Ramdall and Boot invention. It was used in test equipment only, and not seen as significant.

    • @virtualinfinity6280
      @virtualinfinity6280 2 роки тому +6

      @@proudsnowtiger ...and you are both wrong. True, the first magnetron done by Greinacher did not work properly, but showed the basic design. The first working magnetron was done by Hull in the US , Habann in Germany and Zacel in Prague. The first high-frequency magnetron was created by Okabe in Japan and the first high-power magnetron by Nakajima, also in Japan.
      The work of Randall and Boot was a significant improvement of the Hollman (German) magnetron, patented in 1939. It was significant, as it considerably improved Hollmans design and allowed for several orders of magnitude in better output, thus making it practical for high-precision radar applications. So the statement in the video is correct - it was an improvement of the original german design, although a very significant one.

    • @Steve-GM0HUU
      @Steve-GM0HUU 2 роки тому +3

      Yes, cavity magnetron was a British development early in WW2 by John Randall and Harry Boot developed before rapid development of the idea by British company GEC produced many orders of magnitude more power (e.g. 25KW) than earlier magnetron designs.
      The ability to generate and radiate such high peak power at centimetric wavelengths in a small robust unit was major advancement in RADAR that gave the Allies an advantage until the end of the war.

    • @keyboard_g
      @keyboard_g 2 роки тому +3

      These videos are short on facts. Its frustrating because the topics are good.

    • @Margarinetaylorgrease
      @Margarinetaylorgrease 2 роки тому

      @@virtualinfinity6280 "cavity magnetron" not "magnetron".

  • @andywhite40
    @andywhite40 2 роки тому +99

    I'm overlooking the Royal Navy slip up at the end!! Glad you mentioned Goering's love of this aircraft, it's one of many baffling decisions that probably contributed to the Nazis downfall. It did find it's niche as a night fighter though, that large cockpit had plenty of room for the radar operator and cannons plus the 110 was basically unopposed at night immediately overcoming it's weakness against single engined fighters. Another great video, many thanks!!

    • @VincentNajger1
      @VincentNajger1 2 роки тому +4

      He cant manage one single vid without a gaff somewhere

    • @scootergeorge9576
      @scootergeorge9576 2 роки тому +5

      @@VincentNajger1 - Perhaps you have done better?

    • @米空軍パイロット
      @米空軍パイロット 2 роки тому +3

      @@VincentNajger1 He pumps out an enormous volume of videos on multiple channels. He is definitely cutting time on proofreading, but it's understandable.

    • @stanpotter7071
      @stanpotter7071 2 роки тому

      @@VincentNajger1 We'll wait right here for your video, Vinny.

    • @gingernutpreacher
      @gingernutpreacher 2 роки тому

      It shot down mosquito's but I thought they were to fast?

  • @htos1av
    @htos1av 2 роки тому +51

    Of the multi-engine fighters, the Mosquito rules them all. Due to its power to weight ratio. And I'm an American who is biased for the P-38. The big crew area was its strength in utility.

    • @aspen471
      @aspen471 2 роки тому +4

      I'd say the mosquito was a great plane but in the history books it went from heavy fighter bomber to reconnaissance and dive bomber that lost all armaments for bombs the p-38 retained it's job of bomber escort, heavy fighter, dive bomber and it took out Yamamoto it was a smaller frame faster and in my opinion looked better. Oh and it wasn't made of wood

    • @jamielacourse7578
      @jamielacourse7578 2 роки тому +3

      This isn't about the Mossie. What's your point?

    • @darkknight1340
      @darkknight1340 2 роки тому +1

      The P-38 was an incredible fighter,possessing the flight characteristics that Willi Messerschmitt could only dream of,from a Brit who is biased in favour of the mosquito!.

    • @deanwood1338
      @deanwood1338 2 роки тому +1

      Mosquito is arguably the first truly multi role aircraft. It done everything well if not great. Always loved twin engine prop planes.

    • @tB3o3tR9o9
      @tB3o3tR9o9 2 роки тому +1

      in my book, the Mosquito was flying fire wood

  • @longrider42
    @longrider42 2 роки тому +48

    And yet the P-38 Lightning was an excellent twin engine fighter. And let us not forgot that wonderful wooden wonder the British Mosquito! Two engines and was an excellent air plane. But yeah the BF110 had a very short lived glory days.

    • @gort8203
      @gort8203 2 роки тому +19

      Yes, because the P-38 implemented the concept correctly as a single seat heavy fighter. If it had a long greenhouse and a tail gunner it probably would have been a failure as a fighter.

    • @uberduberdave
      @uberduberdave 2 роки тому +4

      @@gort8203 You're quite correct. At the end of WWI, two place fighters were among the best for their ability to cover rear attacks with a gunner. By WWII, speeds had doubled and G loading was fierce. Adding gunner positions to Axis fighters made them overweight and nearly useless. The 110, 210, 410, Breda 88 and Japanese twin engine fighters all became targets for Allied fighters.

    • @TyroneSayWTF
      @TyroneSayWTF 2 роки тому +4

      The P-38 was actually the *ONLY* twin-prop heavy fighter (originally designed as a high-altitude bomber interceptor) during WW II that could actually effectively compete against enemy single-engine fighters without being at a *huge* disadvantage during aerial combat (because of their size and weight, all heavy fighters would naturally be at disadvantage against lighter more agile single-engine designs). Its (the P-38) combat record in all theaters of war was nearly 3800 enemy planes in total shot down - well more than half being enemy single-engine fighters.

    • @Alte.Kameraden
      @Alte.Kameraden 2 роки тому +7

      P38 didn't perform much better than the Bf110. As an interceptor and escort it performed quite poorly. The Luftwaffe considered the P38 to be the easiest allied fighter to shoot down when it was in service in Europe. In it's nickname The Fork Tailed Devil was entirely allied Propaganda. The Germans called it Double Tail.
      The P38 thrived in the Pacific however, but it struggled as a fighter in Europe and was entirely phased out by the end of 1944 after really only one year of real service in the Western Theatre. Even the famed Mosquito was only renowned for it's high speed low altitude raids, not because it was an excellent fighter.
      So you guys are giving the P38 way too much credit. It's performance when compared to the Bf110 was actually comparable, Bf110 was actually more agile but the P38 was normally faster. The so called superior dog fighting prowess of the P38 is heavily exaggerated.
      Heck it's even noticeable in simulation games like IL-2 and War Thunder, Bf110 being far easier to fly. They both perform well if using identical tactics but I prefer the Bf110s without question in War Thunder because they handle better.
      No heavy fighter was a match for a single engine fighter if the skill and training if the pilots were equal however. This is why the P38 made a name for itself in the Pacific not Europe. The Pacific in which kill to lose ratios were off the charts in the latter years. So of course the P38 would get a high kill to lose ratio there, the Hellcat blew it out of the water though.... and it was a single engine fighter... Guess what, P38 pilots in the Pacific didn't dog fight, the hit/ran ie energy fought. Same tactic all allied pilots on the Pacific were taught, to deal with their more agile foes. This means the P38 only needed to fly faster and climb higher, didn't need to be a fighter, in this context the Bf110 would of performed relatively well in that same scenario.

    • @drcovell
      @drcovell 2 роки тому +1

      Yeah-glaring omissions, P-38 and the Mozzie, especially the one with an anti-tank gun in its nose!

  • @stevencordick6228
    @stevencordick6228 2 роки тому +10

    The 110 always been a favorite of mine. Looks cool too

  • @JohnSmith-bx8zb
    @JohnSmith-bx8zb 2 роки тому +5

    Sadly you forgot to add that the RAF sent de Havilland Mosquito radar equipped night fighters in to the Bomber Stream that made life very unpleasant for the Me110 NF’s

    • @raypurchase801
      @raypurchase801 2 роки тому

      Correct. The RAF introduced a concept to Luftwaffe aircrews, known as "Mosquito panic".

  • @maisonraider4593
    @maisonraider4593 2 роки тому +5

    The best German night fighter was in fact the heinkel he 219. A truly magnificent twin engine aircraft for its role.

  • @MightyAllen1995
    @MightyAllen1995 2 роки тому +11

    I’m a simple guy, a see a new WW2 video from Dark Skies, I click.

  • @WarSecrets
    @WarSecrets 2 роки тому +3

    I've always loved bf 110 ever since playing the video game their finest hour the Battle of Britain

  • @DrivermanO
    @DrivermanO 2 роки тому +4

    Royal Navy?

    • @moxie_ST
      @moxie_ST 2 роки тому

      I fought that I heard wrong but I did not.
      Royal NAVY?

  • @conservativemike3768
    @conservativemike3768 2 роки тому +2

    I’d like one now: durable, aerobatic, long range, plenty of leg room, decent cargo and guest capacity.. what’s not to like?

    • @toniberger6005
      @toniberger6005 2 роки тому +1

      the price tag and the woke outbrake from the crybabys in the press if you would make a modern comercial version of it.
      and i would like to add : good looking to your collection ^^

  • @Wookie120
    @Wookie120 2 роки тому +2

    Can You do a video on the HE 219?

  • @garyjust.johnson1436
    @garyjust.johnson1436 2 роки тому +2

    The old timers would ask the rookies: what makes the Port running lights green, the lens or the bulb. And after the noob would say it was the lens because all bulbs are the same color, the old timer would say: WRONG! The Port running light is RED! Great video, great content, great channel.

    • @letoubib21
      @letoubib21 2 роки тому

      In fact there were colored bulbs and colored lenses, it depended on the plane *. . .*

  • @haitolawrence5986
    @haitolawrence5986 2 роки тому +7

    The Bf 110s came over a few times in the summer of 1940. Few returned. The Hurricanes and Spitfires ate the rest. 😎

    • @PedroConejo1939
      @PedroConejo1939 2 роки тому +4

      That's a gross misrepresentation. Certainly, the Bf 110s did have some really bad days, usually when they were flying slow, close bomber escort, but they had some very good days as well, inflicting heavy losses on the RAF on occasion, in particular when it was employed to its strengths such as high advance waves that were able to dive on rising RAF fighters and then get the hell out of Dodge - a common fighter tactic on all sides. It's certainly not true that 'few returned'.
      They were withdrawn partly because some were sent to act as night fighters to combat the RAF's raids on Germany itself, and partly because production didn't match losses - as much a reflection of German aircraft production management as in the effectiveness of the Bf 110 as a fighting machine. Used correctly, it was passable; used incorrectly, it was a liability - but it wasn't the only aircraft to suffer that fate.

    • @raypurchase801
      @raypurchase801 2 роки тому

      The 110 was the reason Goering thought he could bomb London in daylight. The 109 barely had enough fuel, but the 110 could reach London with ease. Another crappy decision from Fatso.

  • @thomasmaloney843
    @thomasmaloney843 2 роки тому +2

    This really competed more with the A20 Havoc. A20 was used in many of the same roles.

    • @omartorres5688
      @omartorres5688 Рік тому

      Not to mention the A20 was the better plane out of the two

  • @smythharris2635
    @smythharris2635 2 роки тому +2

    Eric Brown's autobiography is pretty good read. He was a very brave man.

  • @TheBattleMaster100
    @TheBattleMaster100 2 роки тому +2

    One has to ask why was Erhard Milch allowed to have so much say in Luftwaffe aircraft procurement. He seems to wanted to fight the war all by himself.

    • @letoubib21
      @letoubib21 2 роки тому +1

      Milch was more useful than the "aces" Udet and Göring together *. . .*

    • @martindice5424
      @martindice5424 2 роки тому +1

      Milch was at least sober and not a junkie.
      Also he had a firm grasp of what the operational needs and capabilities of the Luftwaffe actually were - rather than what certain individuals wanted them to be.

    • @TheBattleMaster100
      @TheBattleMaster100 2 роки тому +1

      @@letoubib21 Udet could've been around longer if Goering hadn't pressured him at his job

    • @jamesricker3997
      @jamesricker3997 2 роки тому +1

      Because Milch actually showed up for work. Alcoholism and drug addiction tend to interfere with job attendance

  • @johncunningham4820
    @johncunningham4820 2 роки тому +1

    Handsome Brute . Very effective . Got overtaken by Improved technology .
    Is there one of these Mini Documentaries about the HENKEL 219 ? Committed Night-fighter . Very fast and Heavily armed .

  • @swingingbunny3550
    @swingingbunny3550 2 роки тому +2

    The heavy twin enegined fighter wasn't a German design, but first made by the Dutch Fokker design, amazing the whole world by it's new concept.

    • @letoubib21
      @letoubib21 2 роки тому

      The Bf 110's maiden flight was in May 1936, the Fokker's in March 1937 *...*

  • @Chalky.
    @Chalky. 2 роки тому +2

    In an admittedly morbid way I'm conflicted in while I don't want wars to happen, I also do want to see the innovations and tactics another world war might cause.

    • @jt95124
      @jt95124 2 роки тому

      The interesting wars are over, WW2 was the last. Now they are either counterinsurgency/asymmetric, or uncontemplatable. All the peers with modern weapoins have nukes, and who will lose? WW2 was the sweet spot for interesting. Before that, not enough tech, the battle might be lost due to lack of communication ability After that, it become press a button and the computer does it for you. .

    • @VincentNajger1
      @VincentNajger1 2 роки тому

      Thats why the Cold War was a 'good thing', because it pushed massive tech advances without the major belligerents actually going to war with each other (discounting the small scale colonial proxy wars, which ended up being mainly a 'real world' weapons testing opportunity in many cases)

  • @ronalddevine9587
    @ronalddevine9587 2 роки тому +1

    Thank God they failed

  • @TRINFSS
    @TRINFSS 3 місяці тому

    I always thought the Bf-110 was a beautiful airplane. Amazing how you can change it’s role from a failed day fighter to a successful fighter-bomber, night-fighter and bomber killer.

  • @towgod7985
    @towgod7985 2 роки тому +5

    OMG! There is soooooooo much information in this video that is JUST WRONG! This channel really has to start fact checking their scripts BEFORE making a video!

    • @gort8203
      @gort8203 2 роки тому +2

      Facts are not part of their business model.

  • @pcowdrey
    @pcowdrey 2 роки тому

    Very good video. One small criticism: when you say "Only two models survive tothis day.", this is incorrect verbage. "Model" has to do with the type aircraft. The BF-109 is a model of aircraft.
    As to the surviving airplanes, what you mean to say is: "There are only two examples of the BF-109 surviving to this day." =PC=

  • @Wongwanchungwongjumbo
    @Wongwanchungwongjumbo 2 роки тому

    The Engineering of the German Luffwaffe attack Bomber design led to the British Aerospace manufacturer De Havilland to design the Mosquito and the American Lockheed P38 Lightning fighter light Bomber.

  • @johndyson4109
    @johndyson4109 7 місяців тому

    2 20m.m. cannons not 4. 4 in total... The 110 is one of my favorite German WWII planes..

  • @TerribleShmeltingAccident
    @TerribleShmeltingAccident 2 роки тому

    I come from the same place that the notible Nazis do...my grandmas on BOTH sides are from Vienna. Plus my mom was the product of an affair between a high ranking Nazi and his maid, given up for adoption so the officers wife could save face . Total Nazi blood in me = 75%
    This has caused me immense pain in my life.
    How could I possibly come from such hate?
    How can it be possible that I am a mere 3 generations down the line from a group of humans that most would agree were the worst perpetrators of genocide this planet has ever freaking known?!
    Thankfully I am not anything close to those people - I am ever mindful of the opposite perspective. It is simply a matter of karma to me, what goes around comes around. I will never punish another being because I have screwed up. I refuse to make another go without so that I can go with. Actually it's totally irrelevant, u would never believe me any way so what's the point?
    The point is if I pass the buck when no one is watching what will "come back" around in the future? You know the answer already friend....stahp whining!

  • @toniberger6005
    @toniberger6005 2 роки тому

    well i would not dare to compare 6-8 50cals to the overkill from the 110... 4 20mils cannons + 2 8mil mgs (without extra for what ever variant).... the 110 was the "best" nightfighter for a good reason ^^ at night the agility and speed adv from single fighter planes where utterly useless. the later 110´s could operate even without any vision to the enemy. and they got deployed against bombers not fighters (after the battle for britain) XD
    and the 110 flew until the end. the plane did his job with his new role in night aircombat better than any other plane in the war. and this for a 30´s design.
    / sry for my bad english

  • @mattclark6246
    @mattclark6246 2 роки тому

    Before the Mosquito aircraft
    The British made the Westland whirlwind with twin engines
    As a heavy duty fighter bomber
    Both the British and Germans aircraft were nearly identical to each other
    Dark skies make a video of the Westland whirlwind aircraft
    Another forgotten aircraft from WW2 era
    Shalom world peace ☮️

  • @johnkauppi7078
    @johnkauppi7078 Рік тому

    The Bf110 was an heavy gun ship and equipe with 'jazz music'45 degree 20 ml atuo cannon.

  • @jonadam5392
    @jonadam5392 Рік тому

    "If ever fighter pilots died in vain,it was the Zerstorer(BF 110) pilots of the Battle of Britain."

  • @ChumpMasterSupreme
    @ChumpMasterSupreme 2 роки тому

    The Germans really knew how to make some beautiful planes regardless of how effective they actually were 😂

  • @Taistelukalkkuna
    @Taistelukalkkuna 2 роки тому +1

    0:05 I see what you did there.

  • @jakelandry5645
    @jakelandry5645 2 роки тому

    Pronunciation 👌👌👌🔥🔥🔥💯 thank you for that detail.

  • @lonnieclifton8307
    @lonnieclifton8307 2 роки тому

    that thing has the ugliest cockpit ive ever seen...but i guess looks aren't everything.

  • @scottmurphy650
    @scottmurphy650 2 роки тому +1

    The fighter that needed its own fighter escort.

  • @bobweber2127
    @bobweber2127 2 роки тому

    Can you please stop saying however all the time?

  • @gordon295
    @gordon295 2 роки тому

    STOP USING the NAZI Word !! FFS😡

  • @beachboy0505
    @beachboy0505 2 роки тому +1

    Great video 📹
    All technology moved fast in war.

    • @tesmith47
      @tesmith47 2 роки тому

      sigh, too true, what if the leaders of this world had put that effort towards improving human existance

  • @little_black_raincloud
    @little_black_raincloud 2 роки тому

    Please make a doc about the F-105.

  • @BleachBlonde-java
    @BleachBlonde-java 2 роки тому

    Would like to see a video on b52 lucky lady 3

  • @scootergeorge9576
    @scootergeorge9576 2 роки тому +2

    I believe the Bf 110 would have been a superior fighter aircraft without the rear seat gunner and guns and using 4 to 6 12.7 mm nose guns. The resulting lighter aircraft would have had superior speed and maneuverability.

    • @booferzz
      @booferzz 2 роки тому

      Germans had 13mm guns, not 12.7. The airframe itself was heavy, areodynamicslly limited, and armoured. It’s a sledgehammer of combat aircraft, not a scalpel like a 109. The differences in weaponry from 2x20mm and 4x7.92 to 6 12.7mm guns wouldn’t change enough to warrant the aircraft for a role change. This is one of my favourite aircraft of all time, and they are fantastically capable aircraft, especially the later G models. They were just misused once the British had radar installations. However, this is in hindsight, and this was still in the early years of the heavy fighter/support aircraft concept in that form. Sorry for the long message 😂

    • @scootergeorge9576
      @scootergeorge9576 2 роки тому +1

      @@booferzz - Oops 13 mm. Maybe it was the Japanese that used a 12.7 mm. I just believe a light weight 110, especially powered by the DB 605 would have done better in air to air combat vs single seat fighters. But the was a very good ground attack fighter/bomber and night fighter. But it did have its limitations.

    • @booferzz
      @booferzz 2 роки тому +1

      @@scootergeorge9576 I totally get the theory, and yes it would improve it I’m sure, but I’m not confident in its ability to combat a spitfire in combat 1 on 1 I think it wouldn’t make a big enough difference honestly. I would love to see a powerful lightweight bf110 tho, that would be cool.

    • @letoubib21
      @letoubib21 2 роки тому

      And where should Germany have gotten those .50 machineguns from?

    • @letoubib21
      @letoubib21 2 роки тому +2

      @@booferzz *_". . . I would love to see a powerful lightweight bf110 tho, that would be cool."_*
      And then you would call it _Whirlwind_ ?

  • @ИгорьПрохоров-е8п
    @ИгорьПрохоров-е8п 2 роки тому

    Одни и те же кадры крутит " историк"

  • @yutakago1736
    @yutakago1736 2 роки тому +1

    The BF-110 influence the A-10 design.

  • @muhammadavycena2890
    @muhammadavycena2890 2 роки тому

    Grandpa a 10 Thunderbolt

  • @brianford8493
    @brianford8493 2 роки тому

    junk before it flew

  • @zelphx
    @zelphx 2 роки тому

    "Mono-COKE"?

  • @macjim
    @macjim 2 роки тому

    It was no mosquito

  • @thomaswayout9081
    @thomaswayout9081 2 роки тому

    ö