There's a "law" if you will about using calculators that applies here: "Garbage IN equals garbage out." Which I think you might have done right at the start by assuming the KMR has the same 84% VF as the LMR?! Messing around building 9 element collinear antennas out of coax from scratch I learned you REALLY need an accurate velocity factor measurement to get the lengths right for alllll those elements, performance and SWR can do wild things when you have 9 elements covering 4 bands and they all start interacting. Also learned an important fact about manufacturer's "VF numbers" vs post production reality... Not familiar how that Rig ex spurt stick works, but I unroll the coax and actually use a tape measure to get the precise length, a "known value". Then I hooked up my NanoVNA test leads and calibrate/zero those before testing the coax and doing some math on an ancient technology called 'paper'...😋 After testing a BUNCH of different batches of KMR-400 my samples all tested at about 4-6% faster VF than the 84% in print on the LMR data sheets. Over all I was pretty impressed with that coax and I'd say I got way more than I paid for.
#1: Never test cable, especially coax with a foam die electric in a tight coil. Read specifications of LMR-400 & look at installation criteria. That coil of ‘KMR’ was coiled from China waaay too tightly & most likely distorted the positioning of the center conductor in relation to the sheath. Bingo. There’s your excessive loss.
I thought so too. I'm no expert but I thought it's gotta have some effect on its loss. I'm thinking about some 25' segments between antennas and rigs, and imagine the loss will be smaller than found! Thanks for your observation, John J!
Add to that, that he did not really used the most scientific way of measuring this cable. A Simple NanoVNA would have shown him the exact loss and if there were some problems inside the cable because of dielectric distortion from the tight bend.
Hmmm, I looked up the Times Microwave datasheet for LMR-400 solid core (not ultra flexible stranded core). It says: Bend Radius: installation in. (mm) 1.00 (25.4) Bend Radius: repeated in. (mm) 4.0 (101.6) If you can install LMR-400 with 1 in radius bends, seems to me you can ship it in a coil with a 2 in to 6 in radius bends. Am I missing something?
You seem pretty bright, man. Not sure why you pulled your two base numbers from thin air. Velocity and length of cable. All the math is based on two numbers that are not correct.
Probably suitable for most installations but a few thoughts... Lack of specs on Amazon mean you had to assume a lot in your testing. It is possible it performed even better to its actual specs, just not to LMR-400's specs. (Although, who knows... without the specs, it may have performed even worse!!) But since no one ever claimed it was LMR-400, is it fair to test to that standard? Probably not. You should have done an actual length measurement- simple enough to do accurately. Chances are, it really was 75-feet, just that your velocity factor was incorrect for the actual sample of cable you had and therefore the length measurement is off a bit (also, TDR length measurements are rarely accurate). Having said all that, we don't really know what the dielectric used is in this cable. That has a huge impact on the test results. The other "Amazon" factor is that you could order this cable ten times from Amazon and not get the same exact product each time. So who knows what you're getting next time or from where? Will those good connectors be on each product? Don't know. When it comes to the performance of radio systems, the transmission line is absolutely critical. Especially when tower climbing and winter maintenance come into play. Better to spend a little more money and get known quality cable from known reputable distributors who know and understand what they are selling. Amazon's integrity goes as far as refunds or replacement - but that is little consolation if you missed grabbing rare DX because of a cable failure at the wrong moment. As always with the likes of Amazon, eBay, etc., buyer beware and you get what you pay for.
Agree fully on every single word! Living 70 km south of the Arctic Circle and with the temperature (-27) at the time of writing, there is no doubt that a good brand coax is the way to go! I would not call it a healthy operation to climb a tower today. 😁
So... normalizing your results on db/100' and comparing KMR-400 to LMR-400, I'm seeing that it averages less than -0.2dB loss compared to the LMR-400 (worst at -0.39dB at 15m; strange shape to the data suggests measurement error, IMO)? Not sure what the accuracy would be on the MFJ-849. Would have liked to see the testing methodology (mode, sequence, timing, temperature, etc.). Percentages murk the water; should have done apples to apples with the cables and measured in dB.
Considering the price of HF radios and quality HF antennae, why would you want to skimp on the coax? Coax is the weakest link in your communications system subject to all kinds of environmental hazards, pollutants and toxins. I pay the extra dollars and get the good stuff.
If you're on a budget, I still say wait and buy the good stuff. For 58 bucks and made in China, you can't expect it to perform as well as TM or M&P. You want good coax, you will have to shell out the green stamps for it. Great video, Mike. -K5SFC
I was left scratching my head after watching this video. I went ahead and ordered a 75' run of kmr400. I tested it myself vs the old sma RG58 handheld extension cable I bought first 100' run(yes I'm dumb and learn the hard way) Both cables were ordered from Amazon. Here are the losses measured by my nano vna, and expected transmitted power from a 50w radio based on those measurements: Cable Type: KMR400 (N) 146 MHz: -1.09 dB (42.25 watts) 450 MHz: -2.29 dB (34.8 watts) Cable Type: RG58 (SMA) 146 MHz: -4.58 dB (27.8 watts) 447 MHz: -7.96 dB (14.84 watts)
Back in the 80's, I used RG 8 and RG 58 from Belden. Both in the Marine Corps, and personal use. Currently, for HF, I'm still happy with standard RG 8, RG 8X, and RG 58. For VHF and UHF however, I tend more to LMR 400, where the lower loss in those bands are substantial. I'm on a small fixed budget. I terminate my own cables and buy bulk cable as possible. Tailor the cost to the application is my thought. Nothing is perfect. We do what we can. Also, as a side note, your coil looks like a loose choke from other videos. Others have commented, so I won't belabor the point. For those unknowing, please seek the other comments and search for common mode chokes. I've not done my own tests as yet, so I won't comment further. (tests are planned, just not today.... :) )
I think if you are on a tight budget that is a good deal. Of course if you can afford it you would go with the M&P.The connectors look great, I cringed when you cut that one off.
Retired RF bench technician here. I worked for a couple of fellows in the late 1970's in a mobile stereo/ CB shop when the CB craze was going. We had problems with some of the customer's vehicle installs with the intermittent SWR readings. The cable installed was the off-the-shelf Radio Shack Tandy Wire RG-58. We then replace those with an Amp brand cable with no further problems. We dissected the Tandy cable and found at even intervals along its length there was the center conductor just pinching on one side of the foam dielectric to the outer braid, causing intermittent shorts. Tandy did produce their own wire and cable, I believe in a factory in Indiana. Evidently they didn't have enough cool time out of the extruder before coiling the cable up. Their coax products did improve though. Tandy did make their own xtals for their CB radios and scanners as well. These shifted lower in frequency over time sometimes into the next channel.
Foam core cable is relatively easy to damage; I've seen many tower installations where the foam is entirely compressed by cable clamps, which is why we only use 1/2" and 7/8" "hardline" feeders; they can usually take the abuse.
Good Point.. My guess is that the added loss at the higher frequency is related to the dielectric material used.. Also is how close the tolerance is related to the center conductor and shield. Is it perfectly spaced along the entire length. I had a VIP tour of the Belden Factory back in 2012, and the machines used to make their cable are super complex and fully computer controlled. Who knows what they do in China??? Robert WA6PHN
I bought some of this cable and the threads where missing so I sent it back. I ended up going to Ham Radio Outlet for my cable. Got way better stuff. KD6VGB Jerry
Great video, thank you! "Better" is subjective, and this coax is likely "good enough" for most amateur radio use cases. It seems great for the price. But I'm using 75-ohm RG6 for my HF antennas, so there's also that.
I got some free reel 'tailings' of RG-11 years ago from an apartment construction project installing cable TV trunks. Ended up with several hundred feet. You can spin '259's onto it easily. I use it on everything except my dual-band antenna. Great stuff. SWR is acceptable. 75-ohm cable was in use long before 50-ohm stuff was around.
I'm not trying to be critical, but you should have adjusted the VF to match the length, instead of assuming the cable was shorter than 75 ft. You could have ran it with both VFs and then uncoiled and verified the length after you were finished. That said, thanks for all your work.
If your coax lengths are to very long, it doesn't really matter. Mine are all less than 50feet (30m). I have an eclectic collection of coax and don't notice any significant differences among the types of and brands of coax I use. If your coax runs are 100, 200 or 300ft long, well, take out a second mortgage on your house and buy some "quality" cable.
@@randykitchleburger2780 I use RG213 or some heavier gauge coax for my UHF/VHF feed lines. For HF RG58 is cheap and works ok. Like I mentioned, my feed lines are less than 50ft, some much less, especially in portable/mobile situations.
Nice that you analyzed that cable for everyone. By the way db is a logarithmic scale, not linear, so you cannot say 3db loss equals 50w so 1db every 16.6 If you expect 0.6db/75ft of attenuation at 50MHz the power you should expect is 87.1 Also in all of these measurements you should take account of the power meter accuracy and the stability of the power source (ie the radio). But I guess at the end of the day, to have a rough idea what you’ve done is enough. 73 Diego
Also, foam die electric coax in an excessively tight coil by default created attenuation, thanks to distortion of the foam. LMR was designed for straight runs with sweeping bend radius (can’t recollect specifics)
@@Rob2 Well, that is what you get if someone makes You tube videos without understanding the fundamentals he / she is talking about. There are a lot of those self styled experts on you tube and sadly those that really know their stuff are few and far in between.
I get a chuckle when people talk about brands like Messi and Paoloni. Like it’s something akin to Rolex or Ferrari. I have my ham fest spools of Tandy RG 58 etc. there are other parts of the system that have a greater effect on the station. Most importantly are you having fun making some contacts within your budget?
I was kinda thinking the same thing. You make a choke out of coiled coax to change the characteristics of the cable's operating parameters at that point. I'm not sure testing the 75ft coil is very telling. How about a follow up with the cable rolled out for comparison?
A choke is to prevent RF from coming back on the shield. I'm testing power into a 50 ohm dummy load. This is not my first experiment and in my experiments I have found that for power testing, it makes zero difference. Look at my videos testing Messi & Paoloni Cables. They are all uncoiled. Before I uncoiled hundreds of feet of coax in my house, I took a power reading. After I uncoiled them, I took a reading again. Would you believe they were the exact same number?
In the coax the energy is traveling inside the coax so it is irrelevant whether the coax is coiled on a spool or not. You don't have any fields outside of the coax at least in theory. In practice due to imperfections in the outer conductor braid maybe some but is very negligible for this kind of measurements. I think you are mixing other effects when you connect an ubalanced line to a non proper unballanced load and the outher conductor acts as part of the antenna (example coax to dipole antenna without a ballun - please don't get it wrong because in many cases it works without a ballun without side effects, but this is completely another topic) but those effects don't have nothing to do with power delivery in the cable and its losses.
A test you might consider is to seal the ends of a few 1ft long samples of various cables and see how they survive the sunlight, I am in the UK so the test might take forever though...
I'd save my money & buy Messi (I'm friends with him) coax. Might cost more, but I know it will be better. I've used crappy Chinese made coax in the past, & I'd sooner bin it. My portable HF uses a hard line coax.
I would agree. Stefano and I have had many a zoom meeting. He is such an incredible person with an amazing passion for what he does. I've learned so much from him and I know that we have only scratched the surface.
i have never had any luck out of junk cable/coax it gives me fits every time i cheep out it bites me in the well you know...tried it again last week and same results & i knew better and still did it so NO CCA EVER Its nothing but junk (to me) copper is King & Really the only way to go IMO ! I have ben into radios for 30-35 years an even run a repair shop for 20+ years ! This ij just my experiences with it an like always yours may vary !
Very interesting test, thank you. I'm going tbe in ham for over 50 years and this is the first time that there are so many vendors building coax. This would be an interesting video series for you to continue with the other manufacturers such as, but not only including DX engineering, who build their own coax cable. There are a lot of vendors on the Internet advertising LMR 400 coax made by other than Times Microwave, these would be interesting to examine.
Anyone can make coax in their garage and can call it whatever they want.Ordinary coax cable is not regulated and buying 3rd party cables can get you anything from great to utter junk even from the same part number and vendor.I always laugh at the average ham, they don't think twice at spending a couple thousand dollars on the newest rig and then skimp on the most important part, the feedline, buying and using the cheapest junk they find.
So it's good stuff! That's good to know. I'd been more impressed if he had compared the same length of LMR 400 with connectors hooked up in the same way and showed those results instead of just relying on the chart of specs for the LMR 400! On the one hand he doubts the specs of KMR 400 yet believes totally the spec sheet of the LMR 400!!! It's been my experience those specs sheets from manufacturers are always calculations from IDEAL LAB CONDITIONS and i doubt anyone can duplicate those findings in the field! So like that guy im actually impressed with it! My only complaint is I don't like the big thick coax. It's just too hard to handle. Thanks for sharing!.
Why would you say the solid always should do better? Electrons run on the outside. Stranded has more outside. . Another thing. It's copper clad aluminum. Aluminum has more resistance than copper. But I'll still buy a better brand. I like the stranded core.
@@hamradiotube isn't it electricity "voltage and current" until it reaches the antenna and then it becomes RF, a radio frequency? If solid performs better then why do the top coax manufacturers use stranded? Is the gain and flexibility really worth the loss?
the question is; how does an antenna transmit signals the answer: 1) Electricity flowing into the transmitter antenna makes electrons vibrate up and down it, producing radio waves. 2) The radio waves travel through the air at the speed of light. 3) When the waves arrive at the receiver antenna, they make electrons vibrate inside it.
I'm not sure what kind of test setup this is and what the margin of error is but it seems like a really convoluted way of testing insertion loss. I've tested the S21 insertion loss of the kmr-400 utilizing an Agilent Vector Network analyzer calibrated using Keysight (Agilent/HP) 85032F calibration standards.. the end result was that it was in within the margin of error of LMR 400 ultraflex. Utilizing a watt meter and a dummy load to measure insertion loss at best has a 20 to 30% margin of error, also whether or not the coax is coiled or laid flat uncoiled on the ground can make a significant difference when using that method. The bottom line is the measurement system you use is not very accurate. Even using a nano VNA and measuring S21 insertion loss would be more accurate by several orders of magnitude. By the way you really want to test the coax at the highest possible frequency. Personally I like to do insertion loss testing of coax at 900 MHz the problem with doing this is if the coax is using pl259 connectors, the pl259 connectors can cause reflections that result in erroneous measurements. When testing insertion loss it's best to use either N-type connectors or SMA connectors on the coax. Coax with pl259s on it shouldn't really be tested much higher than around 150 MHz.. pl259's will even cause issues with S11 coaxial loss and TDR measurements, they are really crappy connectors primarily because they are not constant impedance and those impedance bumps cause reflections. One PL 259 is probably not a problem get a few of them on a feed line and you could run into serious impedance issues above 150 MHz
As someone who worked in telecommunications we would never use some off brand coax. I worked with frequencies from high band VHF up to 13GHz and failure of communications causing a pipeline shutdown could cost millions
I really wonder about how tightly that cable was rolled up. If you carefully unrolled and attempted to straighten it out, would it still read as badly?
The larger the diameter of the coax, the more efficient it's going to be. You can use their coax builder to compare coax in terms of length, size, and efficiency (attenuation, the less the better). messi.it/dati/layout/attivo/calc_ord.asp?l=EN&
Thanks for the interesting video. It's a decent test, but like another said I would prefer to measure the velocity factor instead of using the published value for Times LMR-400. I would also recommend computing the loss in dB for comparison with the table published on the Amazon site and for comparison with other cables. It would be easy to normalize the result to loss/100ft or whatever standard you want to use. I wonder if the capacitance of the dielectric could be (easily) measured... that would provide another data point. All that said, I have some cheap cable that I bought when I first became a ham (about four-years ago). But now I buy cable from reputable sources, including direct order from ABR or buying from DX Engineering. I really don't trust Amazon and do not want Chinese sourced supplies. The Chinese *can* make good stuff. When they do, the cost is comparable to other sources (naturally). I'm reminded that when I was a kid (the hills were not yet dusty), "Made in Japan" was a pejorative. The Japanese figured it out and now their production quality is top shelf. The Chinese can too. 73 de AG7TX
Long ago the British had products coming from Germany labeled as "made in Germany," also to reflect alleged poor quality. Of course now "Made in Germany" is a badge of quality with (almost) no equal.
The Chinese already have figured it out, whatever you buy cheap are mostly small garage cottage industries...that is where most the junk comes from, that and contract manufacturing purposefully designed and produced to be cheap... there is a whole industry in China that does contract manufacturing, from boards to solder. depends on what you want for the gadget you are selling you can have quality machine placed automatic soldered boards, you can have quality control brand name parts or rejects / fakes , you can have your boards soldered in the homes of people who get paid by how many they can do in a day.The latter has no quality control. All this ends up being sold to the cheap hobbyists and hams mainly in the US and Europe and Australia. The big manufacturers offer and deliver quality work with quality parts that can hold their own with anyone else in this world.
KF5MCJ Ron Tulsa. I am working on my station for the first time in ten years. I retired last year at 67 and now have time and a little more money. I ran my station antenna wires with Amazon RG-58, RG6 and RG8X, I believe I am having cable problems. I have enough RG 213U to replace what I purchased from Amazon. If you could offer an option on the RG-213U, I would greatly appreciate it. I have an Electrical Engineering background. Aluminum conductor has a rating factor of 60% compared to copper. RG-213U Resistance 0.17 Ohm /100 ft, Impedance 50 Ohms, Capacitance 32.2 pf/ft, Velocity 66%, Attenuation 4.7 db /100 ft 400 Mhz. I will be running new lines for both HF antennas and UHF/VHF antennas. I was looking for a procedure to test this cable before I install it. I was given about four hundred feet ten years ago. 73
Uusing your numbers at 50 MHz, the 74' KMR has 100W in and 81W out which is -0.915 dB. The LMR has 100W in and 76.64W out which is -1.155 dB at 103' or -0.830 dB at 74'. 0.915 dB vs 0.830 dB is not very significant.
Great video but I just wonder if your results would have been different if you had uncoiled the KMR400 and measured as a straight run. As we know coiling cable can give higher reactance/resistance results. Keep up the great work😊
And of course there is no way to tell if it will get brittle, or ooze plasticizers, or the dialectric breaks down over time. Good enough for "we'd better grab some extra cable" field ops, where sometimes the cable WILL have doors closed on it, etc. But I'd prefer something I could rely on, not whatever the shipper sent in a random week.
I bought somting like that that, and it was copper clade steal as inner conductor. A couple of years and the inner conductor corroded away from the outside connector. Indoor was not corroded.
"Fantastic" connectors are silver plated and have Teflon dielectric, (though I do like the shielding on this stuff.) These clearly aren't silver plated. You should use a good temperature-controlled iron to test the dielectric to see if it's Teflon. I grabbed a dozen good ones some time ago at a swap for cheap from someone who needed money. Having said that I always solder on my own connectors. It's really the only way to guarantee reliability. BTW, I've always figured a stranded center conductor had lower loss because of higher surface area. Am I wrong?
Thanks for showing this Mike. In my use, coax is something that stays in service for a good period of time. It's worth it to me to get a coax that I know to be top quality. Pay now or pay later. It would always bother me that I was leaving some signal on the table. If your strapped for cash, no doubt it would be better than RG-8X. I have Chi-Com radios and radios made in Japan. The Chi-Com radios are my throw away radios for the most part. The radios from Japan are the ones I'd bet my life on. I'll stick with M&P or Times Microwave. You're still Killing it Mike !
Excellent video! I have an 80 foot run from my entry panel to a tall oak tree. I used M & P hyperflex 13 with N connectors for the 2 meter/70 CM run and DX Engineering DX 400 Max for the three other runs of coax. Two are covering UHF/VHF and HF, leaving two DX 400 Max runs available for expansion. I have lightning arrestors both at the base of the tree and at the entry panel with both bonded together with appropriate ground wire and ground rods(including the service ground). I spent the most $ where I would have had the highest loss (VHF/UHF). I felt that the DX 400 Max was close enough to LMR 400 and that the cost savings justified it (bought a 500 foot bulk roll). The run was underground in a plastic electrical conduit. Downhill from the tree to the house with drain holes in the conduit just before the 90 degree bend up to the entry panel as an egress point for any water that might get into the conduit. I used the M&P Evo connectors...see Callum's video. The soil here is red North Carolina clay...I didn't want to dig a trench more than once!!! I had to wait for the budget to catch up to the purchase order and I am glad that I did. Perhaps there was a reason the KMR specs were unavailable! I'm generally of the opinion that over-engineering is under rated! Though I did have budgetary constraints to contend with1 73
How close did you put all those feed lines together? What about interface issues? I'm pretty new to the hobby but my understanding is that any metal which runs longitudinally with the feed line will change the SWR and can potentially generate RF noise on the other cables, right? How is this setup working for you? And are you ever trying to transmit on one radio while the other is connected and listening? Or is it all on the same radio and type just switching out antennas?
@@darinhitchings7104 I have one 80 foot run of M&P hyperflex 13 for VHF/UHF and 3 runs of DX400 max for everything else. All 4 coax runs are in a 2 inch plastic electrical conduit. Lightning arresters both at the entry panel and mounted to a ground rod at the base of the oak tree. I've had no issues.
It would be interesting to do a true comparison of diameter, coverage, and true performance. I also believe that for the test to be accurate, the cable needs to be stretched, suspended in a non-conductive tray and measured. It would be very interesting to do an LMR-400 vs the KMR-400 and other brands. Do all of them at 100 feet since that is how the standard is made, but some companies probably do their measurements in meters. Also, I knew the ad was suspicious on Amazon as it said cable is made in the USA and assembled in China. LOL!
Cable 100% does not need to be stretched out to test for length, loss, velocity factor, etc. It is just fine coiled up like this. Trust me. I just spent 4 days in Italy at the Messi & Paoloni factory. I have a video that will be coming out in the following weeks showing how they test their coax so you can see how it's done.
The connectors may have a problem tightening up on the radio/antenna. I bought 25 that looked like them, the threads on the sleeve were not enough, causing only 1, maybe 2 turns on units
@@robertsumption1243 I bought the bad units from HRO, I called the day they came in. I was told to send a pic, I did, never heard from them. I spent over $12.000 that year with them. You would think they would replace them. I no longer buy from them.
I'm prob not smart enough to know that but in other tests I've done with different lengths, I've just looked at the overall loss compared to what the manufacturer specs according to the specific length and frequency. Because I don't have all the same lengths of coax and don't really feel like cutting them all to the same length I've found that gives me a good enough comparison between them. You can see what I mean in this video I did testing M&P coax. ua-cam.com/video/EbryAONb1BQ/v-deo.html
I would be interested to see how the cable does at higher frequencies. Being that the cable is copper clad aluminum, my guess is the performance would be better where the skin effect is more prevalent.
Everything proven people's thinking now are terrible plus internet is terrible 1 internet causes problem's in the future locking up 2 people don't do good enough job on sodering tvs now days everything proven VCR players are tilling on tvs now days everything proven my new tv itself was doing this when you which a vhs tape the tv picture screen moving left and right and when I got my own tv resoder it fixed the problem it doesn't have that problem at all now
The last thing that I would do in my shack is buy cheap coax. Everything I've ever bought that was "a real bargain" turned out to be NOT so in real use. Dave W7DGJ
I'm thinking the signal loss has to do with the quality control as to keeping the center conductor as perfectly centered in the coax as possible. Materials could be another issue. You saw just how easily Mike was able to rip the outer plastic off the cable. Not so easy with the quality stuff. Of course Mike is a beast, maybe he just made it look easy...lol
As the other person mentioned, the gap distance in the foam air core. But also the crimp connectors and resulting interfaces. I'd be willing to bet with a good set of press or solder type PLs for LMR from TMW or Belden etc would probably improve performance
The greatest loss in coax up to around 1 GHz is the copper loss , or should say conductor loss as some of the cable id made up of other materials than copper. That is called the I square R loss, or the heating of the wire loss. Standard power loss in a conductor of any type including the house wiring or wires going from the DC supply to the radio. The foam type insulation just allows larger center conductors for less loss for the same basic size coax. There is some small less loss in a solid center conductor than the stranded especially as the frequency goes up.
Well, at QRP levels, you might be able to quibble the losses. But for most of the kilowatt crazies, well, at that point, who cares? Yeah. I'd use it. Even for QRP maybe even. Especially when you conside all my coax is pulled from the dumpster tossed out ethernet hose maybe 20 years old ;-) Thanks for the review & video. Stay sane, amigo. 73 de W8IJN
I knew a guy that ran cable left over from a local cable TV truck that he got for free. 75 ohm coax on a 52 ohm antenna gives you a 1.5:1 SWR which is a blistering 4% loss. All of the "experts" told him he couldn't do it, but...
I love cheap so much I bought some RG-213 with a MFJ label for a really good price. Two years later the jacket that was exposed to the elements was in terrible shape. By comparison it was installed near some Wireman RG-213 that was installed 20 years ago and the Wireman outer jacket was in much better shape.
Once in awhile you search for info on something, and ACTUALLY get the exact answers you were looking for. THIS VIDEO is one of those times!! Excellent well-thought-out video with measurements, numbers, and an actual teardown. I couldn't swing the extra cash for the Times Microwave stuff this time around so took a chance on the KMR-400. At least I know now that I didn't get ripped off and it should do a decent job, even if it falls a little short of the Times Microwave version. Thank you!
Not for longer runs - look at the loss. 4.4 dB/100' at 100 mHz. compared to 1.232 dB for LMR400. Soldering a foam dielectric coax works fine. You just have to tin the braid with a large iron before installing the connector and after installing the connector, let it cool before moving it to allow the foam to re-solidify. Quality crimp-on connectors work very well.
@@jimeppright7862 That loss is at 100 feet though. I have my antenna mounted at 36 feet high which is the first wavelength above ground and the loss at that length is near zero. Also, majority of base stations don’t have antennas nowhere near 100 feet and that’s a factor. So inevitably, as time progresses and the weather and sunlight has damaged the LMR outer jacket “especially that junk ultra flex outer jacket” the RG 400 will still be intact. I ran times microwave LMR 240 and 400 for decades and neither type made it passed 6-7 years without the outer jacket ruined by sunlight and weather elements. Since I’ve upgraded to RG400 12 years ago, coax maintenance or replacement is not needed. Beside, I’ve seen BBi run 30,000 peak watts through RG400 and we all know you can’t even do that with anything named LMR. 73☑️✌🏻
@@GroundControl204 Replacing coax after 6-7 years is a sign of poor quality coax or a wrong choice for the installation. I've had many hundreds of feet of CommScope LMR400 outside in a southern state for 16 years so far and it is fine. I have not used LMR400UF because of its well-known premature jacket deterioration. Belden makes a durable version, the new, not the original flawed, 9914 as I recall. I had some of it up as a rotator loop for 10 years with no sign of deterioration. I would not use RG400 in a rotator loop because of its stiffness. I am interested in weak signal work. So, to me, almost zero loss means much less than 1 dB. If your coax is 50' long and used at 28 mHz, the loss is just over 1 dB. LMR400 would have about .32 dB loss. I'll buy all the .7 dB I can get for $100 each, and 50' of LMR400 with connectors installed is less than $100. That is better performance than RG400 for much lower new cost. I have used short pieces of RG400 for jumpers because I got them surplus for peanuts. I would also use it for toroidal chokes. But I would not use it for a lengthy run no matter how cheap it was. As to power handling capability, RG400 is spec'ed at 2.75 kW at 30 MHz. You can calculate how much heat it would have to dissipate at 30 kW. I think the dielectric would not arc over (although the connector probably would), but the center conductor would be red hot really fast. Don't have certain animals around, small amounts of evaporating PTFE is poisonous to some.
If I want to know if a coil of coax is 50 or 75 ft, I can swag a velocity factor and measure it with an analyzer. If I want to measure it loss in order to evaluate its qualiy, I'll go to the trouble of uncoiling it and rolling out my 100' tape measure to check the length. The cable passed for "good for general use" on lower frequencies, but I'm not sure it was given a fair shake un VHF, given the assumptions made. Looks remarkably well built for a cable sourced off of Amazon.
Thanks for sharing. I just received a 25 foot roll of this for my VHF/UHF base antenna (From the antenna to lightning arrestor at base of pole) Looking forward to see how it holds up.
Maybe you can reterminate the coax with traditional Amphenol solder type PL259 connectors & Uncoil the coax for retesting the dB loss...Your dB loss/frequency measurements seem way higher compared to its quality appearing construction....
Solid-center aluminum is not going to do as well as solid copper. Copper clad is not a replacement for the good stuff. You also need to check this cable at 146Mhz as well as 445Mhz for losses. I have a spectrum analyzer/tracking generator. I would love to test that on my analyzer. I just may purchase some of that wire just to see it. Nice testing you did, however. Your research was great!!
A fair comparison would have been to run your same measurements against 75' of coiled LMR.
Mike doesn't want to be fair! He wants to sell you on Chinese shit! I wouldn't put that coax on my DX Commander if you give it to me!
This sort of stuff really suits you Mike.. Although I have to say, doesn't matter what you do, it's always just great!
Hey thanks buddy!
There's a "law" if you will about using calculators that applies here:
"Garbage IN equals garbage out." Which I think you might have done right at the start by assuming the KMR has the same 84% VF as the LMR?!
Messing around building 9 element collinear antennas out of coax from scratch I learned you REALLY need an accurate velocity factor measurement to get the lengths right for alllll those elements, performance and SWR can do wild things when you have 9 elements covering 4 bands and they all start interacting. Also learned an important fact about manufacturer's "VF numbers" vs post production reality... Not familiar how that Rig ex spurt stick works, but I unroll the coax and actually use a tape measure to get the precise length, a "known value". Then I hooked up my NanoVNA test leads and calibrate/zero those before testing the coax and doing some math on an ancient technology called 'paper'...😋
After testing a BUNCH of different batches of KMR-400 my samples all tested at about 4-6% faster VF than the 84% in print on the LMR data sheets. Over all I was pretty impressed with that coax and I'd say I got way more than I paid for.
#1: Never test cable, especially coax with a foam die electric in a tight coil. Read specifications of LMR-400 & look at installation criteria. That coil of ‘KMR’ was coiled from China waaay too tightly & most likely distorted the positioning of the center conductor in relation to the sheath.
Bingo. There’s your excessive loss.
which coax would you recommend？I am using ic705 with end fed antenna. Thanks!
I thought so too. I'm no expert but I thought it's gotta have some effect on its loss. I'm thinking about some 25' segments between antennas and rigs, and imagine the loss will be smaller than found! Thanks for your observation, John J!
Add to that, that he did not really used the most scientific way of measuring this cable. A Simple NanoVNA would have shown him the exact loss and if there were some problems inside the cable because of dielectric distortion from the tight bend.
@John Jones does it result in permanent damage or can it be corrected by straightening the cable out?
Hmmm, I looked up the Times Microwave datasheet for LMR-400 solid core (not ultra flexible stranded core). It says:
Bend Radius: installation in. (mm) 1.00 (25.4)
Bend Radius: repeated in. (mm) 4.0 (101.6)
If you can install LMR-400 with 1 in radius bends, seems to me you can ship it in a coil with a 2 in to 6 in radius bends. Am I missing something?
You seem pretty bright, man. Not sure why you pulled your two base numbers from thin air. Velocity and length of cable. All the math is based on two numbers that are not correct.
Probably suitable for most installations but a few thoughts... Lack of specs on Amazon mean you had to assume a lot in your testing. It is possible it performed even better to its actual specs, just not to LMR-400's specs. (Although, who knows... without the specs, it may have performed even worse!!) But since no one ever claimed it was LMR-400, is it fair to test to that standard? Probably not. You should have done an actual length measurement- simple enough to do accurately. Chances are, it really was 75-feet, just that your velocity factor was incorrect for the actual sample of cable you had and therefore the length measurement is off a bit (also, TDR length measurements are rarely accurate).
Having said all that, we don't really know what the dielectric used is in this cable. That has a huge impact on the test results. The other "Amazon" factor is that you could order this cable ten times from Amazon and not get the same exact product each time. So who knows what you're getting next time or from where? Will those good connectors be on each product? Don't know.
When it comes to the performance of radio systems, the transmission line is absolutely critical. Especially when tower climbing and winter maintenance come into play. Better to spend a little more money and get known quality cable from known reputable distributors who know and understand what they are selling. Amazon's integrity goes as far as refunds or replacement - but that is little consolation if you missed grabbing rare DX because of a cable failure at the wrong moment.
As always with the likes of Amazon, eBay, etc., buyer beware and you get what you pay for.
Agree fully on every single word! Living 70 km south of the Arctic Circle and with the temperature (-27) at the time of writing, there is no doubt that a good brand coax is the way to go! I would not call it a healthy operation to climb a tower today. 😁
So... normalizing your results on db/100' and comparing KMR-400 to LMR-400, I'm seeing that it averages less than -0.2dB loss compared to the LMR-400 (worst at -0.39dB at 15m; strange shape to the data suggests measurement error, IMO)? Not sure what the accuracy would be on the MFJ-849. Would have liked to see the testing methodology (mode, sequence, timing, temperature, etc.). Percentages murk the water; should have done apples to apples with the cables and measured in dB.
Considering the price of HF radios and quality HF antennae, why would you want to skimp on the coax? Coax is the weakest link in your communications system subject to all kinds of environmental hazards, pollutants and toxins. I pay the extra dollars and get the good stuff.
👏👏👏👏👏👏👏good for you
If you're on a budget, I still say wait and buy the good stuff. For 58 bucks and made in China, you can't expect it to perform as well as TM or M&P. You want good coax, you will have to shell out the green stamps for it. Great video, Mike.
-K5SFC
You don't even have to go that far, just buy some quality Diamond or Comet branded coax pre made lengths.
I was left scratching my head after watching this video.
I went ahead and ordered a 75' run of kmr400.
I tested it myself vs the old sma RG58 handheld extension cable I bought first 100' run(yes I'm dumb and learn the hard way)
Both cables were ordered from Amazon.
Here are the losses measured by my nano vna, and expected transmitted power from a 50w radio based on those measurements:
Cable Type: KMR400 (N)
146 MHz: -1.09 dB (42.25 watts)
450 MHz: -2.29 dB (34.8 watts)
Cable Type: RG58 (SMA)
146 MHz: -4.58 dB (27.8 watts)
447 MHz: -7.96 dB (14.84 watts)
How are those numbers possible? 100' of RG58 compared to 75' of KMR that is larger diameter. Can you elaborate some?
put it out in the texas sun and see how it weathers, plus do some real contacts to see if its ok. 58 bucks ? Id bite.
Back in the 80's, I used RG 8 and RG 58 from Belden. Both in the Marine Corps, and personal use. Currently, for HF, I'm still happy with standard RG 8, RG 8X, and RG 58. For VHF and UHF however, I tend more to LMR 400, where the lower loss in those bands are substantial. I'm on a small fixed budget. I terminate my own cables and buy bulk cable as possible. Tailor the cost to the application is my thought. Nothing is perfect. We do what we can.
Also, as a side note, your coil looks like a loose choke from other videos. Others have commented, so I won't belabor the point. For those unknowing, please seek the other comments and search for common mode chokes. I've not done my own tests as yet, so I won't comment further. (tests are planned, just not today.... :) )
Thats a nice induction coil you're testing.
I think if you are on a tight budget that is a good deal. Of course if you can afford it you would go with the M&P.The connectors look great, I cringed when you cut that one off.
For the price, it looks good. A lot better than RG8. 😁
Not everything from Amazon is garbage… LOL…
Retired RF bench technician here. I worked for a couple of fellows in the late 1970's in a mobile stereo/ CB shop when the CB craze was going. We had problems with some of the customer's vehicle installs with the intermittent SWR readings. The cable installed was the off-the-shelf Radio Shack Tandy Wire RG-58. We then replace those with an Amp brand cable with no further problems. We dissected the Tandy cable and found at even intervals along its length there was the center conductor just pinching on one side of the foam dielectric to the outer braid, causing intermittent shorts. Tandy did produce their own wire and cable, I believe in a factory in Indiana. Evidently they didn't have enough cool time out of the extruder before coiling the cable up. Their coax products did improve though. Tandy did make their own xtals for their CB radios and scanners as well. These shifted lower in frequency over time sometimes into the next channel.
🤣🤣
As a current tech, ive seen some things...
One of which is radio shack coax which at best had 60% shielding. Their molded connectors are garbage.
Foam core cable is relatively easy to damage; I've seen many tower installations where the foam is entirely compressed by cable clamps, which is why we only use 1/2" and 7/8" "hardline" feeders; they can usually take the abuse.
Hey Mike, love your videos! Have you considered using a nanoVNA and making a 2 port measurement of loss from 160m, up into the uhf range?
Good Point.. My guess is that the added loss at the higher frequency is related to the dielectric material used.. Also is how close the tolerance is related to the center conductor and shield. Is it perfectly spaced along the entire length.
I had a VIP tour of the Belden Factory back in 2012, and the machines used to make their cable are super complex and fully computer controlled.
Who knows what they do in China???
Robert
WA6PHN
I have not. I actually bought a Nano VNA a couple years ago and hated it so much I gave it away. Too clumsy of an interface.
@@hamradiotube for the price it's an incredibly powerful tool.
I bought some of this cable and the threads where missing so I sent it back. I ended up going to Ham Radio Outlet for my cable. Got way better stuff. KD6VGB
Jerry
Thank you for testing and providing objective results!
Great video, thank you! "Better" is subjective, and this coax is likely "good enough" for most amateur radio use cases. It seems great for the price. But I'm using 75-ohm RG6 for my HF antennas, so there's also that.
I got some free reel 'tailings' of RG-11 years ago from an apartment construction project installing cable TV trunks. Ended up with several hundred feet. You can spin '259's onto it easily. I use it on everything except my dual-band antenna. Great stuff. SWR is acceptable. 75-ohm cable was in use long before 50-ohm stuff was around.
I'm not trying to be critical, but you should have adjusted the VF to match the length, instead of assuming the cable was shorter than 75 ft.
You could have ran it with both VFs and then uncoiled and verified the length after you were finished.
That said, thanks for all your work.
If your coax lengths are to very long, it doesn't really matter. Mine are all less than 50feet (30m). I have an eclectic collection of coax and don't notice any significant differences among the types of and brands of coax I use. If your coax runs are 100, 200 or 300ft long, well, take out a second mortgage on your house and buy some "quality" cable.
When you get to UHF regular RG58 starts becoming very lossy. 7db at 50 ft.
@@randykitchleburger2780 I use RG213 or some heavier gauge coax for my UHF/VHF feed lines. For HF RG58 is cheap and works ok. Like I mentioned, my feed lines are less than 50ft, some much less, especially in portable/mobile situations.
Nice that you analyzed that cable for everyone. By the way db is a logarithmic scale, not linear, so you cannot say 3db loss equals 50w so 1db every 16.6 If you expect 0.6db/75ft of attenuation at 50MHz the power you should expect is 87.1
Also in all of these measurements you should take account of the power meter accuracy and the stability of the power source (ie the radio).
But I guess at the end of the day, to have a rough idea what you’ve done is enough.
73
Diego
Came here to say this, glad someone already caught it.
Also, foam die electric coax in an excessively tight coil by default created attenuation, thanks to distortion of the foam. LMR was designed for straight runs with sweeping bend radius (can’t recollect specifics)
Calculating cable loss as "percent efficient" and reasoning "50W is 3dB so 1dB is 16.6W" - I'd say he is not qualified to review coax cable.
@@Rob2 Well, that is what you get if someone makes You tube videos without understanding the fundamentals he / she is talking about. There are a lot of those self styled experts on you tube and sadly those that really know their stuff are few and far in between.
@@germanjohn5626 ok great...wheres your vid?
i think you might find the VF is off...the 84 VF is for braided centre not solid...according to nanovna ...my cable measured around 88%
I get a chuckle when people talk about brands like Messi and Paoloni. Like it’s something akin to Rolex or Ferrari. I have my ham fest spools of Tandy RG 58 etc. there are other parts of the system that have a greater effect on the station. Most importantly are you having fun making some contacts within your budget?
if you want to measure a cable specifications you need to lay it straight, a roll of cable has completely different characteristics.
I was kinda thinking the same thing. You make a choke out of coiled coax to change the characteristics of the cable's operating parameters at that point. I'm not sure testing the 75ft coil is very telling. How about a follow up with the cable rolled out for comparison?
A choke is to prevent RF from coming back on the shield. I'm testing power into a 50 ohm dummy load. This is not my first experiment and in my experiments I have found that for power testing, it makes zero difference. Look at my videos testing Messi & Paoloni Cables. They are all uncoiled. Before I uncoiled hundreds of feet of coax in my house, I took a power reading. After I uncoiled them, I took a reading again. Would you believe they were the exact same number?
In the coax the energy is traveling inside the coax so it is irrelevant whether the coax is coiled on a spool or not. You don't have any fields outside of the coax at least in theory. In practice due to imperfections in the outer conductor braid maybe some but is very negligible for this kind of measurements. I think you are mixing other effects when you connect an ubalanced line to a non proper unballanced load and the outher conductor acts as part of the antenna (example coax to dipole antenna without a ballun - please don't get it wrong because in many cases it works without a ballun without side effects, but this is completely another topic) but those effects don't have nothing to do with power delivery in the cable and its losses.
Wish you could show the loss at 462 mhz
I'm currently running this for two antenna and no complaints. It gets the job done.
A test you might consider is to seal the ends of a few 1ft long samples of various cables and see how they survive the sunlight, I am in the UK so the test might take forever though...
Nonsense. You folks get AT LEAST three days of sunlight EVERY YEAR! 😉🤣🤣🤣
-K5SFC
I'd save my money & buy Messi (I'm friends with him) coax. Might cost more, but I know it will be better. I've used crappy Chinese made coax in the past, & I'd sooner bin it. My portable HF uses a hard line coax.
I would agree. Stefano and I have had many a zoom meeting. He is such an incredible person with an amazing passion for what he does. I've learned so much from him and I know that we have only scratched the surface.
i have never had any luck out of junk cable/coax it gives me fits every time i cheep out it bites me in the well you know...tried it again last week and same results & i knew better and still did it so NO CCA EVER Its nothing but junk (to me) copper is King & Really the only way to go IMO ! I have ben into radios for 30-35 years an even run a repair shop for 20+ years ! This ij just my experiences with it an like always yours may vary !
Very interesting test, thank you. I'm going tbe in ham for over 50 years and this is the first time that there are so many vendors building coax. This would be an interesting video series for you to continue with the other manufacturers such as, but not only including DX engineering, who build their own coax cable. There are a lot of vendors on the Internet advertising LMR 400 coax made by other than Times Microwave, these would be interesting to examine.
46 and some change for me :)
Anyone can make coax in their garage and can call it whatever they want.Ordinary coax cable is not regulated and buying 3rd party cables can get you anything from great to utter junk even from the same part number and vendor.I always laugh at the average ham, they don't think twice at spending a couple thousand dollars on the newest rig and then skimp on the most important part, the feedline, buying and using the cheapest junk they find.
@@germanjohn5626 so are you not an average ham:)
So it's good stuff!
That's good to know.
I'd been more impressed if he had compared the same length of LMR 400 with connectors hooked up in the same way and showed those results instead of just relying on the chart of specs for the LMR 400!
On the one hand he doubts the specs of KMR 400 yet believes totally the spec sheet of the LMR 400!!!
It's been my experience those specs sheets from manufacturers are always calculations from IDEAL LAB CONDITIONS and i doubt anyone can duplicate those findings in the field!
So like that guy im actually impressed with it!
My only complaint is I don't like the big thick coax. It's just too hard to handle.
Thanks for sharing!.
Ah… trying to make the competition of his sponsor look bad. Good business!
What kind of stupid comment is this? And who is my sponsor? You are totally clueless.
Why would you say the solid always should do better? Electrons run on the outside. Stranded has more outside. . Another thing. It's copper clad aluminum. Aluminum has more resistance than copper.
But I'll still buy a better brand. I like the stranded core.
Because solid center conductors perform better than stranded. And RF flows on the skin of the conductor so the resistance of aluminum is irrelevant.
@@hamradiotube isn't it electricity "voltage and current" until it reaches the antenna and then it becomes RF, a radio frequency?
If solid performs better then why do the top coax manufacturers use stranded? Is the gain and flexibility really worth the loss?
the question is; how does an antenna transmit signals
the answer:
1) Electricity flowing into the transmitter antenna makes electrons vibrate up and down it, producing radio waves. 2) The radio waves travel through the air at the speed of light. 3) When the waves arrive at the receiver antenna, they make electrons vibrate inside it.
@k8mrd I’m curious if you put a solder connector on if it would recoup some of the losses.
The connector actually was soldered as well as crimped.
I'm not sure what kind of test setup this is and what the margin of error is but it seems like a really convoluted way of testing insertion loss.
I've tested the S21 insertion loss of the kmr-400 utilizing an Agilent Vector Network analyzer calibrated using Keysight (Agilent/HP) 85032F calibration standards.. the end result was that it was in within the margin of error of LMR 400 ultraflex.
Utilizing a watt meter and a dummy load to measure insertion loss at best has a 20 to 30% margin of error, also whether or not the coax is coiled or laid flat uncoiled on the ground can make a significant difference when using that method.
The bottom line is the measurement system you use is not very accurate. Even using a nano VNA and measuring S21 insertion loss would be more accurate by several orders of magnitude.
By the way you really want to test the coax at the highest possible frequency. Personally I like to do insertion loss testing of coax at 900 MHz the problem with doing this is if the coax is using pl259 connectors, the pl259 connectors can cause reflections that result in erroneous measurements.
When testing insertion loss it's best to use either N-type connectors or SMA connectors on the coax.
Coax with pl259s on it shouldn't really be tested much higher than around 150 MHz.. pl259's will even cause issues with S11 coaxial loss and TDR measurements, they are really crappy connectors primarily because they are not constant impedance and those impedance bumps cause reflections. One PL 259 is probably not a problem get a few of them on a feed line and you could run into serious impedance issues above 150 MHz
How good is it as ground cable :) Your lengths are going to mess with your results.
As someone who worked in telecommunications we would never use some off brand coax. I worked with frequencies from high band VHF up to 13GHz and failure of communications causing a pipeline shutdown could cost millions
I really wonder about how tightly that cable was rolled up. If you carefully unrolled and attempted to straighten it out, would it still read as badly?
Exactly it’s creating a rf choke.
I am replacing my coaxial cable with m & p. What's the difference in benefits between the larger diameter to the smaller diameter coaxial cable.
The larger the diameter of the coax, the more efficient it's going to be. You can use their coax builder to compare coax in terms of length, size, and efficiency (attenuation, the less the better). messi.it/dati/layout/attivo/calc_ord.asp?l=EN&
Thanks
Thanks for the interesting video. It's a decent test, but like another said I would prefer to measure the velocity factor instead of using the published value for Times LMR-400. I would also recommend computing the loss in dB for comparison with the table published on the Amazon site and for comparison with other cables. It would be easy to normalize the result to loss/100ft or whatever standard you want to use.
I wonder if the capacitance of the dielectric could be (easily) measured... that would provide another data point.
All that said, I have some cheap cable that I bought when I first became a ham (about four-years ago). But now I buy cable from reputable sources, including direct order from ABR or buying from DX Engineering. I really don't trust Amazon and do not want Chinese sourced supplies.
The Chinese *can* make good stuff. When they do, the cost is comparable to other sources (naturally).
I'm reminded that when I was a kid (the hills were not yet dusty), "Made in Japan" was a pejorative. The Japanese figured it out and now their production quality is top shelf. The Chinese can too.
73 de AG7TX
Long ago the British had products coming from Germany labeled as "made in Germany," also to reflect alleged poor quality. Of course now "Made in Germany" is a badge of quality with (almost) no equal.
The Chinese already have figured it out, whatever you buy cheap are mostly small garage cottage industries...that is where most the junk comes from, that and contract manufacturing purposefully designed and produced to be cheap... there is a whole industry in China that does contract manufacturing, from boards to solder. depends on what you want for the gadget you are selling you can have quality machine placed automatic soldered boards, you can have quality control brand name parts or rejects / fakes , you can have your boards soldered in the homes of people who get paid by how many they can do in a day.The latter has no quality control. All this ends up being sold to the cheap hobbyists and hams mainly in the US and Europe and Australia. The big manufacturers offer and deliver quality work with quality parts that can hold their own with anyone else in this world.
Looks like a good budget cable for hf .. looks very much like a ll400 I sell here in Australia 🇦🇺
Good video
KF5MCJ Ron Tulsa. I am working on my station for the first time in ten years. I retired last year at 67 and now have time and a little more money. I ran my station antenna wires with Amazon RG-58, RG6 and RG8X, I believe I am having cable problems. I have enough RG 213U to replace what I purchased from Amazon. If you could offer an option on the RG-213U, I would greatly appreciate it. I have an Electrical Engineering background. Aluminum conductor has a rating factor of 60% compared to copper. RG-213U Resistance 0.17 Ohm /100 ft, Impedance 50 Ohms, Capacitance 32.2 pf/ft, Velocity 66%, Attenuation 4.7 db /100 ft 400 Mhz. I will be running new lines for both HF antennas and UHF/VHF antennas. I was looking for a procedure to test this cable before I install it. I was given about four hundred feet ten years ago. 73
You need to learn how to calculate decibels. It is 10*log(P1/P2).
Your method would say that 6 dB damping is 100 % loss, clearly incorrect.
Uusing your numbers at 50 MHz, the 74' KMR has 100W in and 81W out which is -0.915 dB. The LMR has 100W in and 76.64W out which is -1.155 dB at 103' or -0.830 dB at 74'. 0.915 dB vs 0.830 dB is not very significant.
Great video but I just wonder if your results would have been different if you had uncoiled the KMR400 and measured as a straight run. As we know coiling cable can give higher reactance/resistance results. Keep up the great work😊
And of course there is no way to tell if it will get brittle, or ooze plasticizers, or the dialectric breaks down over time.
Good enough for "we'd better grab some extra cable" field ops, where sometimes the cable WILL have doors closed on it, etc.
But I'd prefer something I could rely on, not whatever the shipper sent in a random week.
I bought a 50' piece of this for a 10meter dipole. Seems like decent quality and I am having good results.
I bought somting like that that, and it was copper clade steal as inner conductor. A couple of years and the inner conductor corroded away from the outside connector. Indoor was not corroded.
"Fantastic" connectors are silver plated and have Teflon dielectric, (though I do like the shielding on this stuff.) These clearly aren't silver plated. You should use a good temperature-controlled iron to test the dielectric to see if it's Teflon. I grabbed a dozen good ones some time ago at a swap for cheap from someone who needed money. Having said that I always solder on my own connectors. It's really the only way to guarantee reliability. BTW, I've always figured a stranded center conductor had lower loss because of higher surface area. Am I wrong?
Thanks for showing this Mike. In my use, coax is something that stays in service for a good period of time. It's worth it to me to get a coax that I know to be top quality. Pay now or pay later. It would always bother me that I was leaving some signal on the table. If your strapped for cash, no doubt it would be better than RG-8X. I have Chi-Com radios and radios made in Japan. The Chi-Com radios are my throw away radios for the most part. The radios from Japan are the ones I'd bet my life on. I'll stick with M&P or Times Microwave. You're still Killing it Mike !
Thank you, Mike. 73. WW5MB
For the price difference, I'll take the slight loss. My antenna (a DX Commander) so rocks I can still hit Moscow from Arizona!
Would soldering the Center conductor make much of a difference?
Professionals prefer crimping these days. A well done crimp produces a cold weld.
Not bad, I think it also useful at 144MHz as well. thanks for review for us. AG6JU
thanks for the video, how do you check the length of coax using a rig expert stick. Can't find anything about it (that make sense) in the manual. TIA.
58$/75ft, what a bargain , happy holidays Mike , 73
You didn't test 75' of real LMR-400...maybe their specs are also over-rated....
I bought all my Wilson-400 open box "used" on amazon! About 150ft for I think around $60. I believe that was a lucky draw though.
Excellent video! I have an 80 foot run from my entry panel to a tall oak tree. I used M & P hyperflex 13 with N connectors for the 2 meter/70 CM run and DX Engineering DX 400 Max for the three other runs of coax. Two are covering UHF/VHF and HF, leaving two DX 400 Max runs available for expansion. I have lightning arrestors both at the base of the tree and at the entry panel with both bonded together with appropriate ground wire and ground rods(including the service ground). I spent the most $ where I would have had the highest loss (VHF/UHF). I felt that the DX 400 Max was close enough to LMR 400 and that the cost savings justified it (bought a 500 foot bulk roll). The run was underground in a plastic electrical conduit. Downhill from the tree to the house with drain holes in the conduit just before the 90 degree bend up to the entry panel as an egress point for any water that might get into the conduit. I used the M&P Evo connectors...see Callum's video. The soil here is red North Carolina clay...I didn't want to dig a trench more than once!!! I had to wait for the budget to catch up to the purchase order and I am glad that I did. Perhaps there was a reason the KMR specs were unavailable! I'm generally of the opinion that over-engineering is under rated! Though I did have budgetary constraints to contend with1 73
How close did you put all those feed lines together? What about interface issues? I'm pretty new to the hobby but my understanding is that any metal which runs longitudinally with the feed line will change the SWR and can potentially generate RF noise on the other cables, right? How is this setup working for you? And are you ever trying to transmit on one radio while the other is connected and listening? Or is it all on the same radio and type just switching out antennas?
@@darinhitchings7104 I have one 80 foot run of M&P hyperflex 13 for VHF/UHF and 3 runs of DX400 max for everything else. All 4 coax runs are in a 2 inch plastic electrical conduit. Lightning arresters both at the entry panel and mounted to a ground rod at the base of the oak tree. I've had no issues.
I've been using some 50ohm no make coax for 13 years now, no idea what the stats are, but it gets me real dx distances every night.
It would be interesting to do a true comparison of diameter, coverage, and true performance. I also believe that for the test to be accurate, the cable needs to be stretched, suspended in a non-conductive tray and measured. It would be very interesting to do an LMR-400 vs the KMR-400 and other brands. Do all of them at 100 feet since that is how the standard is made, but some companies probably do their measurements in meters. Also, I knew the ad was suspicious on Amazon as it said cable is made in the USA and assembled in China. LOL!
Cable 100% does not need to be stretched out to test for length, loss, velocity factor, etc. It is just fine coiled up like this. Trust me. I just spent 4 days in Italy at the Messi & Paoloni factory. I have a video that will be coming out in the following weeks showing how they test their coax so you can see how it's done.
Hey I'm looking for a good quality jumper to run between my amplifier and my cb radio. Any ideas? Looking for something pliable
Well, you aren't doing moonbounce or meteor scatter 24/7 correct? If you were you wouldn't need to ask, LOL. 73, Dave, KU9L
Not 24/7, no. I have to let the ladies rest.
@@hamradiotube Yeah, on e upon a time my XYL got her ticket so we could spend time together.
The connectors may have a problem tightening up on the radio/antenna. I bought 25 that looked like them, the threads on the sleeve were not enough, causing only 1, maybe 2 turns on units
Buzz I ran into that too and got on Ebay and bought some Amphenol pl259 connectors and soldered them on ...problem solved 73 Bob
FYI my cable had copper braid
@@robertsumption1243 I bought the bad units from HRO, I called the day they came in. I was told to send a pic, I did, never heard from them. I spent over $12.000 that year with them. You would think they would replace them. I no longer buy from them.
I bought a jumper from there recently, used it a couple weeks and the connector fell out. Luckily it was within the return window.
All things considered, id keep it as a backup feedline. Great test Mike!
are results like this linear ie can you adjust the numbers from the other coaxies to equalize the length?
I'm prob not smart enough to know that but in other tests I've done with different lengths, I've just looked at the overall loss compared to what the manufacturer specs according to the specific length and frequency. Because I don't have all the same lengths of coax and don't really feel like cutting them all to the same length I've found that gives me a good enough comparison between them. You can see what I mean in this video I did testing M&P coax. ua-cam.com/video/EbryAONb1BQ/v-deo.html
If this is outside for too long, the outer shield will RUST... thinly copper coated steel!
you might get better performance if the connecters were soldered.
They actually were I came to find out. They were crimped and soldered.
I would be interested to see how the cable does at higher frequencies. Being that the cable is copper clad aluminum, my guess is the performance would be better where the skin effect is more prevalent.
Been using for 3 months, much better than most, for the price range!
2:40 coax with gain?! Wow 😍 😂
We used to refer to it as "Gainiax" 😂😂
Everything proven people's thinking now are terrible plus internet is terrible 1 internet causes problem's in the future locking up 2 people don't do good enough job on sodering tvs now days everything proven VCR players are tilling on tvs now days everything proven my new tv itself was doing this when you which a vhs tape the tv picture screen moving left and right and when I got my own tv resoder it fixed the problem it doesn't have that problem at all now
The last thing that I would do in my shack is buy cheap coax. Everything I've ever bought that was "a real bargain" turned out to be NOT so in real use. Dave W7DGJ
Same experience here. 73. W4DXR
LMR 400 all the way lol
Interesting. The build looks like pretty good quality. I'm curious as to what causes the greater signal loss.
I'm thinking the signal loss has to do with the quality control as to keeping the center conductor as perfectly centered in the coax as possible. Materials could be another issue. You saw just how easily Mike was able to rip the outer plastic off the cable. Not so easy with the quality stuff. Of course Mike is a beast, maybe he just made it look easy...lol
As the other person mentioned, the gap distance in the foam air core. But also the crimp connectors and resulting interfaces. I'd be willing to bet with a good set of press or solder type PLs for LMR from TMW or Belden etc would probably improve performance
The greatest loss in coax up to around 1 GHz is the copper loss , or should say conductor loss as some of the cable id made up of other materials than copper. That is called the I square R loss, or the heating of the wire loss. Standard power loss in a conductor of any type including the house wiring or wires going from the DC supply to the radio. The foam type insulation just allows larger center conductors for less loss for the same basic size coax. There is some small less loss in a solid center conductor than the stranded especially as the frequency goes up.
Did you uncoil the coax before measurement?
Well, at QRP levels, you might be able to quibble the losses. But for most of the kilowatt crazies, well, at that point, who cares? Yeah. I'd use it. Even for QRP maybe even. Especially when you conside all my coax is pulled from the dumpster tossed out ethernet hose maybe 20 years old ;-) Thanks for the review & video. Stay sane, amigo. 73 de W8IJN
Even at QRP levels there is no need to quibble the losses. It's a small percentage.
de M3KXZ
I knew a guy that ran cable left over from a local cable TV truck that he got for free. 75 ohm coax on a 52 ohm antenna gives you a 1.5:1 SWR which is a blistering 4% loss. All of the "experts" told him he couldn't do it, but...
Measure the velocity factor and compare to the times.
I assume that poor performance is due to it is mostly aluminum instead of copper.
Worth it
Good video and informative
.
Thank you
You tested an air core transformer vs a straight piece of cable
Everything proven people don't put time in nothing now days
I love cheap so much I bought some RG-213 with a MFJ label for a really good price. Two years later the jacket that was exposed to the elements was in terrible shape. By comparison it was installed near some Wireman RG-213 that was installed 20 years ago and the Wireman outer jacket was in much better shape.
Once in awhile you search for info on something, and ACTUALLY get the exact answers you were looking for. THIS VIDEO is one of those times!! Excellent well-thought-out video with measurements, numbers, and an actual teardown. I couldn't swing the extra cash for the Times Microwave stuff this time around so took a chance on the KMR-400. At least I know now that I didn't get ripped off and it should do a decent job, even if it falls a little short of the Times Microwave version. Thank you!
I had no idea the Stick Pro could tell you the length of coax like that.
Stick with me. I'll teach you something.
Man, you had an RF chock testing in a coil like that.
not at all.
Let’s go!!!!!
RG 400 is the way to go, especially concerning its high heat tolerance makes easier for soldering connectors.
Not for longer runs - look at the loss. 4.4 dB/100' at 100 mHz. compared to 1.232 dB for LMR400. Soldering a foam dielectric coax works fine. You just have to tin the braid with a large iron before installing the connector and after installing the connector, let it cool before moving it to allow the foam to re-solidify. Quality crimp-on connectors work very well.
@@jimeppright7862 That loss is at 100 feet though. I have my antenna mounted at 36 feet high which is the first wavelength above ground and the loss at that length is near zero.
Also, majority of base stations don’t have antennas nowhere near 100 feet and that’s a factor.
So inevitably, as time progresses and the weather and sunlight has damaged the LMR outer jacket “especially that junk ultra flex outer jacket” the RG 400 will still be intact.
I ran times microwave LMR 240 and 400 for decades and neither type made it passed 6-7 years without the outer jacket ruined by sunlight and weather elements. Since I’ve upgraded to RG400 12 years ago, coax maintenance or replacement is not needed. Beside, I’ve seen BBi run 30,000 peak watts through RG400 and we all know you can’t even do that with anything named LMR. 73☑️✌🏻
@@GroundControl204 Replacing coax after 6-7 years is a sign of poor quality coax or a wrong choice for the installation. I've had many hundreds of feet of CommScope LMR400 outside in a southern state for 16 years so far and it is fine. I have not used LMR400UF because of its well-known premature jacket deterioration. Belden makes a durable version, the new, not the original flawed, 9914 as I recall. I had some of it up as a rotator loop for 10 years with no sign of deterioration. I would not use RG400 in a rotator loop because of its stiffness.
I am interested in weak signal work. So, to me, almost zero loss means much less than 1 dB. If your coax is 50' long and used at 28 mHz, the loss is just over 1 dB. LMR400 would have about .32 dB loss. I'll buy all the .7 dB I can get for $100 each, and 50' of LMR400 with connectors installed is less than $100. That is better performance than RG400 for much lower new cost. I have used short pieces of RG400 for jumpers because I got them surplus for peanuts. I would also use it for toroidal chokes. But I would not use it for a lengthy run no matter how cheap it was.
As to power handling capability, RG400 is spec'ed at 2.75 kW at 30 MHz. You can calculate how much heat it would have to dissipate at 30 kW. I think the dielectric would not arc over (although the connector probably would), but the center conductor would be red hot really fast. Don't have certain animals around, small amounts of evaporating PTFE is poisonous to some.
I don't ever apply the "not bad for the price" phrase to coax. Of course I also feel using that phrase leads us to mediocrity but I digress.
Is the KMR-400 cable buriable ?
If I want to know if a coil of coax is 50 or 75 ft, I can swag a velocity factor and measure it with an analyzer. If I want to measure it loss in order to evaluate its qualiy, I'll go to the trouble of uncoiling it and rolling out my 100' tape measure to check the length. The cable passed for "good for general use" on lower frequencies, but I'm not sure it was given a fair shake un VHF, given the assumptions made. Looks remarkably well built for a cable sourced off of Amazon.
Thanks for sharing. I just received a 25 foot roll of this for my VHF/UHF base antenna (From the antenna to lightning arrestor at base of pole) Looking forward to see how it holds up.
Save the money and buy LMR 400 namebrand coax so you know what you’re getting
Messi & Paoloni cable beats LMR 400. Even their stranded Ultraflex 10 outperforms it. LMR 400 is outdated.
Maybe you can reterminate the coax with traditional Amphenol solder type PL259 connectors & Uncoil the coax for retesting the dB loss...Your dB loss/frequency measurements seem way higher compared to its quality appearing construction....
Solid-center aluminum is not going to do as well as solid copper. Copper clad is not a replacement for the good stuff. You also need to check this cable at 146Mhz as well as 445Mhz for losses. I have a spectrum analyzer/tracking generator. I would love to test that on my analyzer. I just may purchase some of that wire just to see it. Nice testing you did, however. Your research was great!!
Hm. Well done. Only the crimpings are....bad☺️👍🍀🐿🎅👋👋👋👋