Allah! There is no god but He - the Living, the Self-subsisting, Eternal. No slumber can seize Him nor Sleep. His are all things in the heavens and on earth. Who is there that can intercede in His presence except as he permitteth? He knoweth what (appeareth to His creatures As) Before or After or Behind them. Nor shall they compass aught of His knowledge except as He willeth. His throne doth extend over the heavens and on earth, and He feeleth no fatigue in guarding and preserving them, For He is the Most High, the Supreme (in glory). 10 - Surat Al-Raad: “It is He who shows you the lightning, causing fear and hope and who brings up the heavy cloud. And the thunder declares His glory and His praise, and the angels too for awe of Him; and He sends them thunderbolts and smites with them whom He pleases, yet they dispute concerning Allah, and He is mighty in prowess.” [13:13-14]
Spoony Love Did anyone force you to watch this video? No? Then shut up and relax: you only have yourself to blame, since you CHOSE to watch this video. Go watch something else and keep your profanity and intolerance to yourself.
Kane. The crew member, Kane. He had something attached to his face. We couldnt get it off. Later it seemed to fall off and die. It must have laid something in his throught. Some sort of embryo... um...
@@ajcook7777 The girl that runs Animalogic does this to me unfortunately. I love her content but her gesticulations and head nods and constant dadjoke one liners edited into grand slam factoids... She always lets the cam linger on her self satisfied enthusiasm too long after each line, too. Even the way she closes her lines with a huge pitch drop gets me. She's just too over the top fermeeee... Love what she's doing though and hope she keeps it up. We need more channels devoting their efforts to naturalism and conservation.
Any physicist that writes a book on physics actually does that, they tell you a brief history of physics for the first half of the book and spend the latter half of the book with their thesis now that they've given you and an idea of where their field has come from so you can understand where their thesis/idea of theirs will in fact take us to... Sooooooo, I'm kinda used to old information being explained because sometimes we find we went right when we should've gone left and having knowledge of the previous path helps us decipher where we went wrong.
Well, I want to say something here that popped up when I read your comment. We are all Spiritual. It's eternal spiritual energy throughout all creation. Your own spirituality is unique and we can either accept it or deny It, but either way you go, it is still unprovable and is in the theoretical field. The fact that we can see, speak, have emotions etc. etc. etc. readily reflects our spiritual side. The fact that we feel and express our emotions is evidenced by our individual souls. That's our unique special side that Is expressed in our life decisions throughout our lives. Our physical life tenure is only an undetectable spark in time compared to the age of our own planet (4 1/2 billion years) but we are part of it and for a necessary reason. It's the necessary reflection of the Spiritual side. Regardless of the tenure, both have to exist. This is also why I firmly believe in reincarnation. So, we are unique, have a place and purpose in our creation and existence. We just need to learn how to get along and beat out evil. That's what it's all about.
@jessee sky You hit one point here when you mentioned good and evil. Did you know or even realize that good and evil both must exist? I falls under the unwritten law of opposites. Nothing physical or spiritual can exist without the opposite also existing. For example: If everything was Good, Then we wouldn't know what Bad was. If everything was Bad, then we wouldn't know what good was.. If everything was physical, then there would be no spiritual and likewise if everything was spiritual, Then there would be no physical. There is God and there is also the devil. So where do we go from here? This is getting into what is called Quantum Physics.
@jessee sky Baby - have your keyboard repaired, shove your Satan up your filthy rear entry ( where your "brain" is located ) and : back to square one ( kindergarden ) ... And keep your hatches down - the Behemoth is at the door ! dropbox.com/s/i6p2ur3l06f27xu/Behemoth%20ante%20portas.jpg?dl=0
i love these type of documentaries , I feel like I should get a certificate of completion for watching them, and a minor degree after watching about 50 :)
"All of the energy and matter that existed still exists. Matter does not create energy of itself. The actions of matter enable energy to become manifest".
Yes Trenton, you have to sacrifice your life to dark peaceful universe ! Then you will see the light of the Goat at the end of tunnel !, Is this enough for you ?
Our entire known universe is filled with opposites. Hot/cold, night/day, love/hate. But it goes well beyond into physics. I think we can all agree gravity is the strongest force we know of as humans. I believe gravity has an equal an opposite force. Dark energy, or Antigravity. Gravity itself takes more mass to become stronger. It only stands to reason that a very large area of space with zero mass, could produce its own force. It's as simple as thinking of two containers linked at the bottom by a tube. If you fill one of these containers up with water, then the two will equalize as gravity pushes the water down. Antigravity, with the enormous absence of mass, has overpowered gravity and is ever accelerating the galaxies and stretching the space between them. we as humans are see to believe creatures. Humans are never in direct contact with this force at work. It's on such a huge scale between the opposing forces for us to even imagine it at work. We also don't live in an environment without mass, so we have never seen the force work first hand. Think of the oh so popular ball on a tarp analogy. Where the ball pulls the tarp down and represents gravity as it bends space time. On the edges of our known universe antigravity is so strong it pulls that tarp upwards. And puts a pulling affect on everything that gets closer. This would mean that the universe could actually slow down and become stable one day. Unless empty space never ends and we are torn to shreds. Only to await another bigbang.
Yes gravity is the strongest thing. The guy in this video said the stupidest thing ever said "Gravity is weak if you don't believe me push your friend off a 12 story building". Says it with a straight face.
In the beginning before the universe had any form you can say that it potentially existed in every form. Every potential universe existed until only one did.
The question of where 'we' came from is very interesting to me. By 'we' I mean the energy that was the singularity of the Big Bang that was transformed into all the stuff in the Universe including us. As far as where the Universe is going is not nearly as interesting a question as the first.
'empty' space contains random energy bursts that literally appear out of nowhere (no where as in we cannot explain where they come from). That random burst of enegy at the quantum level is what sparked the big bang.
I personally have a vague, "loosely" held belief/opinion... that "everything", is infinitely "scalable" in either direction (small to large). Once, we had no real understanding of what "things" were made of. Then, we learned of molecules... and, as our technology advanced, improving our capabilities to see "into" smaller and smaller scales... we learned that those molecules were compromised of atoms, and those were compromised of even smaller particles... etc. I don't believe there is necessarily any end to "how far this can be taken". "Theoretically"... any "thing", can be cut in half... then, the half can be cut in half... over and over again to infinity. No matter how small you go... half of "something", is never "nothing". I think that (it's entirely possible that) the same is true in the opposite "direction". Subatomic particles combine into atoms... atoms combine into molecules... molecules combine into "things"... things combine into... (?)... bigger "things" (?) Perhaps, also to infinity. If a quark were "sentient"... then, from its perspective... the atom it is a part of, may appear as vast as a galaxy... and the molecule the atom is a part of, may appear as infinite as a "universe". I'm reminded of the scene in the movie "Animal House", in which Donald Sutherland's character invites them to "smoke some pot", and the conversation... "Wait... so... you're saying that, one molecule in my fingernail... could be an entire universe? ... " We ponder about whether or not there could be "other" life in the universe... when in fact, we can't even say for certain that our universe isn't merely a single molecule within the larger "structure" of some other living organism. We could be the microbes in some other creature's gut... human caused "climate change"... could simply be nothing more than the symptoms of a stomach virus that creature is experiencing. The size, scope, duration (etc) of space and time... are relative to the "observer". We "measure" (just the "observable" part of) the universe as billions of light years across (unreachable distances)... and as having existed for billions of years, and forecasted to exist for trillions more. From our perspective, these are vast, barely conceivable measures of space and time. But, to the "sentient" quark I mentioned earlier... even in a short lived particle (such as are created in a particle accelerator, and last only nanoseconds)... could the space and time which it perceives not seem equally "vast", or even infinite? "Our" universe (for all we know)... could be analogous to the event of a single bubble within a pot of boiling water. How many such bubbles exist in that pot of boiling water... either at any one particular "point" in time... or over the entire span of time during which the pot of water is boiling? We speculate that our "bubble", is larger than we can ever observe... but, still "wonder" if anything might exist outside of it (all of the other bubbles)... but, I seldom hear anyone asking, "what might be outside of "the pot"?" I think that "infinite scalability" is the answer... both the infinitely small... and the infinitely large. The infinite measure of space and time experienced by our "sentient" quark, is but a nanosecond in "our reality"... Couldn't the trillions of years that our universe will exist, be no more than a nanosecond from the perspective of any "consciousness" that exists in a "reality" outside of it? And, couldn't our entire universe ... and everything that happens within it... be just a "microscopic" event amongst an infinite number of other events just like it? Likewise... couldn't that larger reality, outside of ours... also be just one of an infinite number of the same.... etc, etc, etc... ???
Bob in the West I’ve considered this and even shared this with others and people say I’m crazy. Or they just don’t like to think about it because in that regard we are as insignificant as an individual sub atomic particle created and destroyed on a whim. I used to always ask what if we are just part of a larger being? Like if you look at the universe and collection of galaxies doesn’t it kinda look like a circulatory system? Also the way that it’s expanding and growing sort of like we expanded and grew as we aged. It’s an interesting concept that I would be inclined to buy into.
@Justin CollinsI take no pleasure from people being judged by a holy God. I point out this fact and I am wrong? He was warned a number of times. There is nothing anyone can do if someone dies in unbelief. By the way hell is not open yet, people are reserved in darkness until they are resurrected to be judged for every word, thought and deed. It would be good for you if you heeded the warning of wrath to come. Carl, just journeying through.
One could argue that his ailment helped in getting him to realize his "role" in cosmology and waste no time in his research due to the fact of his very real illness. P. S. - SCIENCE is no place for religion. One is factual laws and means based on very real & tangible evidence. While the other is 100% faith based, belief in something you absolutely cannot see/touch/smell/hear etc.
From the center of almost any explosion, material will expand from the center at an increasing rate until fuel is burned, or expended. Only then the slowing occurs.
I have two questions #1 For religious people: - If God created everything, who/what created God? #2 For science: - If the beginning of everything started with the big bang, what caused the big bang? Meaning, what was before the big bang? In other words: What is the beginning of everything? My mind can't grasp the explanation ''nothing was at the beginning...'' it's too easy... Neither God created everything because it comes back to who created God... it's an endless chain... I need something more solid than God or the big bang...
[112:2] Say, He is Allah, the One, Allah, the Independent and Besought of all. He begets not, nor is He begotten, And there is none like unto Him. meaning that there is only one god, Allah, he is infinite, absolute, and all creatures, spiritual, animate and inanimated, are in need of him while he is in need of no one, Neither he was born nor he is the father of any one and there, Allah is uncreated and there is nothing similar dowards his creation nothing like it
You just talked yourself into an impossible riddle. However the world works, we ALL obey the laws of physics. That includes you. Your rant makes no sense as a result.
You have the internet, and it's been 3 years, have you researched it yet? Or waiting for someone on a youtube comment to give you some basic classes astronomy? Because even this video that describes how they observe what they're talking about, still evades you.
If life on earth took trillions of years to develop today's lifestandard as we know it and we all start with the same big bang at the same time, how is it possible that we think alliens are much older and far more advanced than us? I think there only can be an equal lifeform, or a lower lifeform. That's my logic brain. Or some planets took less time to develop. But than it can't be a better developed place, than earth i believe. Explain please? Somebody? Anybody?
@Joe Jack I believe that's just part of being human. We have to ability to make earth a living hell. We can start making the world a better place by not putting warmongers into positions of power.
because that's what we are and that brought us so far where we are now... rivalry, competition and thirst for domination is in our blood and is essential for our evolution, despite what communist trash tells you! 21st century was bloody as hell, 2 world wars followed by the cold war, but that also crated most rapid scientific and technological advancement in ALL HISTORY! We started 21st century on horse back and ended walking on moon FFS...
DarkTV , it is partly, Hitler used evolution and survival of the fittest Which Yes, strictly speaking in not scientific, as the reason to exterminate a certain group of people and bring about a aryan race. Much of So called science, has unscientifically pushed God out of the equation, thus dispensing with moral accountability, giving some the mistaken idea that they can inflict pain and suffering on others with impunity.
Before the big bang… If there was nothing, how do you know it was there or not there? Can you measure nothing? This is circular reasoning. Pretzel logic.
@@williamwatkins2538 Stupid says Noddy? Perhaps you could explain why your tiny mind thinks this is a stupid question. Hes spot on, we DONT know! Anything before about 10-32 seconds is just guesses..Stupid:/
We're all beings of light. Everything and everyone is connected and a part of us. There is no such thing as death. Only a change of worlds or dimensions I guess to be more specific.
Carl Jones exactly, merely stating that something is fact over and over and over again, does not in itself, make that something, fact. If they say it enough times, maybe they think that we,ll abandoned our own power of reason and logic, reject what the evidence, left to speak for itself screams at us, and eventually accept and believe that the naked emperor is wearing clothes, that everything came from nothing. Not this cookie
@@IsleofWightBushcraft I am coming at this from a Christian viewpoint, you may or not agree with my beliefs, but we have both come to the same conclusion. That is, we are being misled in the name of science.
I'm just thinking if matter and antimatter was at one point condensed let's say to the area of the size of our own one single Galaxy but there was an entire universe full of matter and antimatter and it was all touching itself close enough to annihilate itself upon each other wouldn't that create such a violent and turbulent explosion that it could possibly explain the super expansion of the entire universe think about it have you ever played with simple firecrackers like the old-fashioned bobcat little firecracker no imaginebillions and billions and billions and trillions and trillions of billions of billions or trillions of billions and billions or trillions and trillions and trillions of of billions of those little firecrackers going off all at the same time I'm pretty sure that would eventually cause a massive bubble of explosive expansion and it could also explain the erratic behavior of the universe I think we are overthinking everything
@@garymun420 just think that anyone can create anything out of nothing. It's a matter of what imbeciles are who will believe that imbecile. The more limited the idiot is the more limited the believer of the imbecile and all of their imbeciles will follow themselves as their idiot ducklings. They can also be the genius trying to believe themselves in nothing out of a small something that is not in any existence and only exists pertaining to their IMBECILIC foolishness of themselves. Unacceptable!. What is the potential explosion that caused the universe to expand and life to exist on planet Earth can be thought of as something as simple as building a campfire and using a lighter to start the flame and then causing that explosion by dropping that lighter inside that fires explosion yourself out of nothing and being believed that you are not the cause of the fire. BELIEVING that it was someone else in ultimate insanity and the imecile truly believes their lunacy by their conveinence. They then go to the conveinence store and inform everyone that the explosion by themselves that caused caused the forest fire and all lives llost was the wind instead of themselves. Where all believe that imbecile trying to evade their IMBECILIC responsibility. Who am I, I'm NOT that imbecile who started something that isn't there and the insane did by deranged demented conveinence evading their pathetic existence. I'm that creative artist IMBECILE. They're the catalyst of that fire and the IMBECILE MIRACULOUSLY to avoid their lunacy confusions. What idiot believed the idiot by their idiocy conveinence evading their pathetic existence? The idiot exactly like themselves who did not prevent the forest fire by simply not having a simple glass of water to extinguish the explosion. I know that I am not to blame for that pathetic imbecile that all of their IMBECILES believed in their insanity and all imbeciles are. Do not confuse me with your pathetic little imbecile idiots. They're the cause and effect of the explosion of their LUNACYSHITISM. Exclude me from your IMBECILE little duckling list permanently idiot in evading their pathetic existence. DUMBFUKER ENOUGH TO BELIEVE your IMBECILE not my anyone in your pathetic existence. It's time for all dumbfucker to include themselves in that forest fire by evasion and go die in their own blaze that they're all the cause and effect of and by themselves. Do not include me in your PATHETICSHITBIYCHYSKANK ORGANIZATION IMBECILE STRANGERS. KEEP YOUR IMBECILE who confused me as their PATHETICSHITBIYCHYSKANK self to evade who THEY'RE and who they've PATHETICSHITBIYCHYSKANK been. Fuck no you're not blaming me for your pathetic existence and LUNACYSHITISM FOR yourselves believing your pathetic existence. For I am that Burn unit ICU nurse who extinguished your FICTITIOUS WITCH BURNING IN SALEM FOR EXAMPLE IMBECILE MASSACHUSETTS AND GATHERED AN ARMY OF ANGERED PEOPLE AGAINST YOUR PATHETIC EXISTENCE WHO WANTED TO OBLITERATE YOU SKANKYSHITBITCH CALLING AND TREATING ME AS IF I BECAME YOUR PATHETIC SELVES. I AM THAT BRILLIANT EXPERT GENIUS AGAINST ALL OF YOUR ABYSS OF INSANE DELIRIUM STRANGER ENEMIES. GO BURN YOURSELVES NOW IMBECILES. GO AHEAD AND BE THE CAUSE AND EFFECT OF YOUR CHILDS SUICIDE AND GET THE FUCK OFF OF MY COAT TAILS STAY OFF REMAIN OFF PERMANENT IMBECILE. GET THE FUCK OFF OF MY CHILDREN LIARSHITSKANKYBITCH DUE TO YOUR PATHETIC IMBECILES AND NOT MY ANYONE. I'm that Burn ICU unit professional who chose to state, angered army against the DELIRIUMED they're all not worth slaughtering in THEIRSHITBITCHYSKANKY FICTITIOUS witch Hunt in pathetic SALEM again for making a mockery of their Mass hysteria history of mass hysteria murders of mainly intuitve highly intelligent women AGAINST little man with his little woma in THEIRSHITBITCHYSKANKY self guilt of themselves as imbeciles. It's unacceptable. You're still on your pathetic witch Hunt FUCKEDUPSHITSKANKYBITCH STRANGER RABIDSHITSKANKYBITCH Salem for example. The people of the United States of America sane people did anger against your LUNACYSHITISM AND DELIRIUMS AGAINST ALL THAT YOU CAUSED ME AND MY FAMILY IMBECILES DESERVEDLY. WHO CAUSED THAT SALEM WITCH HUNT AGAIN IN SALEM AGAINST ME BY FICTION? CHRISTIANITY! You now make a mockery of mass hysteria murders of mainly intuitve highly intelligent women Salem and to me it's REPULSIVE. Of course you're not sorry because you're REPULSIVE REPREHENSIBLE PATHETIC INFERIORITYSHITBITCHYSKANK LIARSHITSKANKYBITCH RABIDSHITSKANKYBITCH ARMY OF DELIRIUMED DELUDEDSHITBITCHYSKANK STRANGERS. GET THE FUCK OFF OF MY COAT TAILS STAY OFF REMAIN OFF PERMANENT FIRM REPULSIVE REPREHENSIBLE PATHETIC INFERIORITYSHITBITCHYSKANK LIARSHITSKANKYBITCH RABIDSHITSKANKYBITCH ARMY OF STRANGERS PREDATOR TERRORIST DESERVEDLY DISRESPECTED BY ME. KEEP YOUR DELIRIUMS IMBECILE..WHO YOU TRYING TO THINK AGAINST WHAT I KNOW PATHETIC INFERIORITYSHITBITCHYSKANK? WHO ARE CALLING AND TREATING ME AS YOURSELF FUCKEDUPSHITSKANKYBITCH RABIIDSHITSKANKYBITCH STRANGER WOMENCUNT INFERIOR DRAMAQUEENSTWATS? KEEP YOUR PATHETIC WARNEDSHITBITCHYSKANK STRANGERS PSYCHOSESSHITBITCHYSKANKYISM LUNACYSHITISM INFERIORITYSHITBITCHYSKANK IMBECILIC FOOL LIARSHITSKANKYBITCH VEHEMENTLY DESPISED BY ME. YOUR CHILD FOR EXAMPLE KILLED THEMSELVES AS A FORM OF REVENGE AGAINST PATHETIC EXCUSES FOR YOURSELVES NOT DUE TO MY ANYONE. GET THE FUCK OFF OF MY CHILDREN LIARSHITSKANKYBITCH RABIDSHITSKANKYBITCH KILLEDSHITBITCUYSKANK POMPOUSSHIT VIOLATING PREDATOR TERRORIST DESERVEDLY DISRESPECTED BY ME AGAINST KNOWN PATHETIC LUNACYSHITISM. DO NOT CALL AND TREAT ME LIKE I BECAME YOUR PATHETIC WARNEDSHITBITCHYSKANK IMBECILE MIRACULOUSLY DELIRIUMED DELUDEDSHITBITCHYSKANK PSYCHOTICSHIT NOTHING YOU'RE NOT TO LIKE ME. GO AHEAD AND BE THAT RABIIDSHITSKANKYBITCH ARMY WARNEDSHITBITCHYSKANK STRANGERS PSYCHOSESSHITBITCHYSKANKYISM UPON YOUR PATHETIC GRAVES NOW AGAINST YOURSELVES. THAT ARMY AGAINST YOURSELVES WERE ACCURATE TO WANT TO OBLITERATE ALL OF YOU SKANKYSHITBITCH WARNEDSHITBITCHYSKANK STRANGERS BY ME.
KEEP YOUR PATHETIC WARNEDSHITBITCHYSKANK FUNERALS NOW AND FEAR YOUR LIARSHITSKANKYBITCH MEMORIUMS AGAINST THE TRUTHFUL FACTS AGAINST ALL KNOWN RABIIDSHITSKANKYBITCH STRANGER ENEMIES WARNEDSHITBITCHYSKANK STRANGERS NOW IMBECILES. FEAR MY POWER AGAINST YOURSHITBITCHYSKANKY IMBECILE INFERIORITYSHITBITCHYSKANK LIARSHITSKANKYBITCH VEHEMENTLY DESPISED BY ME DESERVEDLY ACCURATELY GUILTY KNOWN FUCKEDUPSHITSKANKYBITCH STRANGER. FEAR WHAT YOU ALL ARE. PANIC FOR WHO'VE YOU'VE BEEN AND THIS BURN UNIT ICU PROFESSIONAL EXTINGUISHED THAT POTENTIAL FIRE AGAINST YOUR RABIDITY.
Just for conversation. Im curious what a theology teacher would postulate coming before a "big bang" expansion beginning, after a never ending expansion heat death of the universe, and why God might make lur universe that way.
@@justinpettit3432 I haven't watched this in a number of months but I'm assuming it's because they reference the universe being 12 billion years old. We in 2019 know it's older and have for over a decade, so it tells me they made this doc. Maybe in the 1990's or early 2000's 😂 before they had current scientific knowledge of it's accurate age. Hope I answered your question.
I wonder what materials and construction would be needed for a black hole probe if it's expected to survive more than a few seconds beyond the event horizon. And how would it transmit any findings/ data? Anyone?
For any creationist wishing to present a logical defense to anyone who asks you for the hope that is in you, you are free to use to the following argument as you see fit. Whatever the case may be, know that you have a logical reason to believe in a creator. From my general observations *between a creator and the object created*, I've noticed a number of general truths. Premise 1. The creator of the object is not a physical property of the object, for the creator doesn't merge with the object and neither does the object merge with the creator. In other words, the creator and object remain separate from one another as opposed to becoming one inseparable unit. Premise 2. The creator's existence is not dependent on the object. If it was, then the object should already have existed, which is obviously impossible. Premise 3. The object's existence is always dependent, among other things such as the raw materials, on the creator, for the object cannot exist without the creator. Premise 4. The creator always exists before the object. Premise 5: Christians believe that God exists and that He's the creator of the universe. Therefore, 1. God is separate from the universe and He can also never be physically verified from within the universe via the scientific method because He is not a physical property thereof. (premise 1) 2. God is independent from the universe (premises 2 & 3), and 3. God existed before the universe (premise 4) This conclusion was arrived at by deductive reasoning and is therefore either valid or invalid. Which means that, atheists will have to falsify the premises if they wish to invalidate the conclusion. The conclusion also does not disallow or impede God from manifesting Himself to us, as He can appear and disappear at will. I.e. He's entirely free to come and go in his creation as He pleases and we would not be able to scientifically prove it anywhere from within the universe. In fact, if we did find any physical evidence of God (God Himself and not his handiwork) inside his creation, then his nature and status as the creator of the universe would be in serious question. In other words, if there is physical evidence of God inside the universe, which can be verified through the scientific method, then I would question whether God is the creator of the universe or actually a creature and hence a product thereof. So, when atheists asks you for evidence of God inside his creation because they can't even find any, then you should rejoice all the more and even thank them for their work. Please also remember that I mean physical evidence of God Himself (as in the creator) and not the work of his hands (as in his creation) when I talk about physical evidence of God. Creation itself testifies to God's existence, but He as creator should not exist inside his creation. Heaven is of course an entirely different matter, but I believe we will only understand that in the hereafter. Take care and God bless.
on the other hand you can't prove the creator based on the object reaction....the car is man made and for the car to prove it's creator cannot base it accordingly on how it reacts. God exists and there's no doubt about that but I doubt God exists based on what Christianity tells us, thier theories are based on the miracles that happened on thier ancestors. they measured the behaviour of how Jesus acted and they say he was God in thier eyes God is nothing like human I believe nothing that an object can discover and see
on the other hand you can't prove the creator based on the object reaction....the car is man made and for the car to prove it's creator cannot base it accordingly on how it reacts. God exists and there's no doubt about that but I doubt God exists based on what Christianity tells us, thier theories are based on the miracles that happened on thier ancestors. they measured the behaviour of how Jesus acted and they say he was God in thier eyes God is nothing like human I believe nothing that an object can discover and see
Sbusiso Hadebe Sorry for the late reply. I didn't initially want to reply, but I would like to get some clarity anyway. Yes, just like programs inside cyberspace cannot prove that humans made them, we are also powerless to prove that God exists. That is why I believe He already manifested himself to us in the past and that He will do so again, but for the last time. I understand what you're saying and I agree with you, but I'm not sure if we're on the same page here exactly. To use your analogy of the car, I'm saying that it's impossible for the man to be a constituent material making up the car as if the man was a property of the car and nor is the car a physical attribute of the man as if it was a constituent material of the man.
Ferdinandt "we are powersless to prove that God exists " True,however the universe and everything in it,proves the existence of God. no creation =no creator. creation =a Creator
The overall structure of our top-down Platonic universe, where monads are quanta by Roger B. Clough (10/26/14) Abstract Here we briefly describe the universe as being simultaneously mental (as monads or quanta) and physical (as bodies or particles of matter). These particles or bodies also have a range of what Leibniz calls perfection, and they indirectly interact such that a more perfect body makes a less perfect body more perfect, the more perfect evolving toward the supreme perfection of the One. The mental sphere (Mind) contains not only monads in the form of quanta but a pre-established harmony (PEH) as well as forces (which are ideas), which can act on them, of which there are two kinds: a) physical forces, which act on mass (as linear momentum) and on spin (angular momentum) and b) electrical forces, which act on the charge of a particle. Mind also contains the powers of creation, reasoning, experiencing, and perception , and control. Mind controls matter just as mind controls the brain. Introduction and discussion The platonic universe consists of two halves of a single entity which we might call the Absolute : comprising the One and the Many, or Self (subject) and Other (object) , as in Fichte. The structure is completely cybernetic, by which we mean that all causation is mental and top-down.. The purely mental or subjective One or singular ruling creator and governor, is a purely mental subject (first person singular) . The Many, its monadic objects, consist of a network of an infinity of mental monads, all alive and conscious to various extents, as well as the physical bodies in spacetime described by them. These bodies. while we call them physical, are actually phenomenal. They move in spacetime only according to the pre-established harmony (PEH), The PEH is not entirely deterministic. Higher order living entities move in various degrees purposefully, by what Aristotle called "final causation". Life is a property of all of the universe of particles, where by life we mean autonomous intelligence, freely able to make its own selections at least according to the PEH. This intelligence is that of Mind, and since Mind causes all and creates all, it is Mind out of which the Big Bang exploded. Time and space are phenomenal, not actual entities, but instead are simply the four dimensions of spacetime , x, y, z and t. These are mathematical or phenomenal variables, not real entities. At the same time, spacetime and the objects in it appear as real when experienced, either by perception or measurement. Thus Leibniz does not consider the everyday world as an illusion, you can still stub your toe in it and perform experiments. Leibniz thus calls this phenomenal world "well-founded". Closing We close by summarizing Plato-Leibniz's conception of the universe, which Bertrand Russell dismissed in passing as a fairy tale-- a vain remark, since Russell never proposed an alternate working model. Plato's universe is cybernetic (top-down), which makes it largely analytic, except for the fact that in the case of life, Aristotle's final causation (purposeful action ) is invoked. In contrast, Panpsychism seems, to this author at least, to be mob rule. There is also Whitehead's metaphysics, but I prefer the computer-like rationality of Plato-Leibniz. So, to summarize Plato-Leibniz's universe: 1. The universe is governed on the large scale mentally and necessarily (if we are to avoid conflict) by a single monarch (the One). This creates all, perceives all, and causes all action mentally, not physically, through Plato's cybernetic, top-down administration. 2. Here space and time only exist as spacetime, which is an artifact (like a map) created locally by the presence of mass in particles or bodies. Spacetime is not a reality, it is simply the mathematical path as curved by the mass. 3. On the small scale, the rules of Leibniz's Monadology come into effect. The universe is made up completely of physical matter in the form of distinct and completely independent bodies moving in spacetime according to the PEH , which is the practical form of the One's control. 4. Each particle or physical body has two simultaneous versions: in spacetime the body is a conventional physical body but it also has a mental mirror version in mental space called a monad. Monads are simply the quantum or mental forms of the particles. 5. Thus we have the One, which controls the Many (the particles or physical bodies with corresponding simultaneous mental monads 6. The particles are behaviorally characterized through through three indexes of force- spin, charge and mass. Charge is a single pole of electromagnetic force. 7. Mass and spin are mechanical , with mass corresponding to linear momentum and spin corresponding to angular momentum of the particle about an axis. Thus each particle is moved either by charge or by momentum. 8. This PEH is simply a top-down cybernetic (mathematical) structure based at the lowest level largely on Einstein's relativity theories, as well as other deterministic theories such as electromagnetic theory, and the broader, nonlocal (entangled) and less deterministic theories of statistical mechanics and thermodynamics. Physics has yet to recognize the nonlocal character of thermodynamics, especially evident in its conservation laws. -- Dr. Roger B Clough NIST (retired, 2000). See my Leibniz site: rclough@verizon.academia.edu/RogerClough For personal messages use rclough@verizon.net
Depends on the definition of "know". The word Science comes from Latin and means knowledge, but till Auguste Comte everything was considered knowledge.
YOU look into the past when you look at a star. It may have burnt out yesterday, but the light from it will contiue to travel through space for thousands of years to come.
The truth is, none of us know how the universe came to be, or how life as we know it started. We can all have theories, ideas, religions and beliefs. None of us were there, none of us can be sure. I find people who claim they do know, extremely ignorant.
I wish I could live forever just to sit back an listen to all the knowledge an theories that astroligist and scientist have that's the only reason I would want to live forever
i never understood why its so weird that universe is speeding up, the distance between masses is getting farther away so the effect of gravity is loosing strength therefore with distance apart from concentrations of mass things speed up
If something created the universe, they what created that thing, and what created that,and that,and that, Nothing can come from nothing. The only logical thing is that im on a tv show like the Truman show and everybody is an actor. If this is true then PLEASE LET ME OUT! I don't wont to be on this show anymore.
It's more likely that black holes are enterances to new universes and even that is unlikely. As far as physics goes though that is the closest you can probably get to what you are describing. Supernovas are just caused by large stars burning all their fuel and then being massive enough to collapse in and the following bounce back of the collapse is the explosion/supernova. Pimental Ferreira is correct as well, the stats that go supernova are already suspended in space-time
The quark plasma apparently but as he Martin Rees says at the start we dont, cant and maybe never know. If people stop bashing CERN because of what the media dubbed it was looking for and im not going to say it but it was called the Higgs Boson really then we might find out and with that knowledge make the world a safer and more friendly place because we wouldnt have that real demon and false god MONEY. Organised religions were all invented by empires that were dying out and the people at the top of those empires jumped on the famous prophets of the day so they could hold on to a bit of power and pass that collection plate around and yes church is a charity but nowadays charities are big business and there is always some guy at the top that gets the BIG salary and or position of power. MONEY is the real devil we as a race of people dont really need it but it is how we have come to evaluate how powerful an individual is as well as ourselves and that is really a fiction a hyper reality the real powers that be have made us believe... I believe in GOD and Jesus and many prophets but creators except our GOD they were not....
Maybe we're looking at this in the wrong way. The infinite singularity was a point in spacetime that had ripped open the fabric of space. Maybe that infinitesimal point, under extremely intense pressure, actually popped and allowed matter/energy to "explode" into our universe?
God God God God God God God God God God God God God God God God God God God God Did not create the earth!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
BIG BANG "THEORY", NOT BIG BANG "FACT". DNA IS LIKE A COMPUTER CODE PIECE OF INFORMATION BUT GENETIC. ENERGY OR MATTER CANT CREATE THAT, ONLY AN INTELLIGENT SOURCE. NOTHING PRODUCES NOTHING HEHEHE.
@@djpsypher916 Idiot. Do you know what a theory is in science? Do you know what a body of evidence is? It's atomic theory not fact. Facts contribute to it. Do we have nuclear reactors and bombs? Might as well deny they exist. Who gives a shit about evidence and proof. You don't even understand the language of science and yet you dismiss it. That makes you a know nothing fuck who decides to lecture people on shit they can't comprehend!
@@djpsypher916 you obviously dont understand what theory means in a scientific sense. plus, typing in all caps doesnt make you right automatically. just says that youre a nutjob
“ We can unify all through the understanding that everything consists of bits of information, though that raises the question of where these bits come from.” - Vlatko Vedral My information theory answers Professor Vedral's question - “...where did these bits come from?” HOW THE UNIVERSE EMERGED FROM THE VOID What Caused the Big Bang? Something from nothing. “Everything is information” - Vlatko Vedral James Rushing 6.30.16 LB, CA This Creation Theory shows how information was first created; how law, existence, energy, matter, time and space, emerged from the Void and created the Universe. THE LAW The first law of identity: Identity Precedes Existence. An identity must have two or more attributes to exist - an existent must be something before it is. EXISTENCE The Void had three attributes: the Void was necessary, sufficient and potentially the Universe, therefore, the Void had an Identity, and so, the Void had existence. ENERGY Upon having existence, the Void combined with the force of its identity and created a new and unique identity - the second law of identity. The second law of identity: every existent has an identity and the force of its identity. The Void, the Force of it's Identity and the First and Second Laws of Identity were the first Identities to be created. Third law of identity Now, the Void, the force of its identity and the first two laws of identity combined and created a new and unique identity - the third law of identity. Third law of identity: no two identities may occupy the same location. Every identity seeks to maintain its identity. This law is the source of the first expansion. Matter Next, these five identities combined to create the fourth law of identity. Fourth law of identity: two or more identities may combine to create a new identity. Time Next, these six identities combined to create the fifth law of identity. Fifth law of identity: time is created to “complete” each creation cycle. Space Space does not exist and never did. What seems to be space is the field of information bits that expanded after the big bang. How quantum information emerged from nothing. These were the first seven identities to exist: the void, the force of its identity, the first, second, third, fourth and fifth laws of identity. These seven, unique identities, combined, according to the fourth law of identity, to create an eighth, new and unique identity; then, these eight combined to create a ninth; and these nine combined to create a tenth, unique identity, etc. Where a=the Void, b=the force of the void's Identity, c=first law of Identity, d=second law, e=third law, f=fourth law, g=fifth law, h=new existent, i=new existent, etc. a+b=c>a+b+c=d>a+b+c+d=e>a+b+c+d+e=f>a+b+c+d+e+f=g>a+b+c+d+e+f+g=h>a+b+c+d+e+f+g+h=i>a+b+c+d+e+f+g+h+i=j>a+b+c+d+e+f+g+h+i+j=k>etc. This Creation of Information Mechanism “cycled” for billions or trillions of years creating a “field of information” that expanded with each cycle, creating our Universe as a continuous “tape” of information. THE BIG BANG The Information Creation Mechanism filled the Universe to a maximum size and density, and then collapsed to a point of maximum density, and with a Big Bang, exploded, creating the second expansion of information, this time with “bits of information,” each “bit” containing all the information and energy necessary to create matter, the cosmos, and life, according to the Laws of Identity. LAWS OF IDENTITY First law of identity: identity precedes existence. Second law of identity: every existent has an identity and the force of its identity. Third law of identity: no two identities may occupy the same location, or, every identity seeks to maintain its location. Fourth law of identity: two or more identities may combine to create a new identity. Fifth law of identity : time is created to combine identities to create new identities . the universe is in a constant state of combining. creation takes time. IMPLICATIONS Everything is information Everything is information is the Theory Of Everything A is A, Existence Exists. What a thing is, determines what it does - Cause and Effect. The Laws of Identity are Universal. Information is Identity. The Law of Identity, A=A , is also known as the Law of non-contradiction and the Law of the Excluded Middle. A=A is the fundamental equation, and the source of Reason, Logic, Science, and, the source of Spiritually, Truth, Love, Freedom and Art; which are the values that create the deep, underlying unity of all that exists. Information, combining and recombining, creating new information, according to the Laws Of Identity, is “the creation mechanism that created the universe.” The Laws Of Identity control creation, design, evolution, and the now; making the Universe self-creating, self-contained and self-explaining. The Force of Identity created the Laws of Physics that built the Universe and created life. Life was followed by consciousness and modern humans. The Force of Identity was the First Force to be created, and is the creator of the Known Forces that created and govern the Universe. They are, in order of creation, the Force of Identity/the Electromagnetic Force, the Strong Force, the Weak Force, and the Force of Gravity. Matter was created after the Big Bang, when the “Bits of Information” combined in all possible ways after the Big Bang. This was the Second Expansion. There was a first and second expansion. One before the Big Bang and one after. The Laws Of Identity are suited for life because they are the same Laws Of Identity that created life. The Force Of Identity can be explained mathematically by an equation: A=A . This equation, A=A, allowed the discovery of physics as a way to know and apply the Laws Of Identity. The Void and the Force of its Identity combined and created the Universe. The Universe and the Force of its Identity combined and created the cosmos. Life emerged from the combining of the cosmos with the force of the cosmos. Mind evolved from the ceaseless combining of life with existence according to the Third Law of Identity. Modern man appeared, not by accident, but by the Laws of Identity, created by the Void and the Force Of Its Identity. A=A is the first equation and the Universal Constant. The Cosmos, Life and Consciousness can be explained by the same equation, A=A, since they are a creation of the same Laws of Identity. Understanding math is natural and crucial to human survival because math and humans are a creation of the same Law Of Identity. We are all one with the Universe and the Creator of the Universe, because all that exists has been created by the same Laws of Identity. James Rushing June 30, 2016 jamesloydrushing@yahoo.com Copyright James Loyd Rushing All rights reserved.
The Big Bang Theory is based upon the assumption that the red shift of distant galaxies is caused by the Doppler effect. However, the red shift is not a Doppler effect. The Universe isn't expanding. The electromagnetic radiation is gravitationally stretched by all of the mass in it's past light cone. The relativistic effects produced are the same as if the galaxies were receding. The deeper we look into space the more time appears to slow down and the more space appears to contract. Eventually we see an infinity of galaxies which appear frozen in time and that is the Cosmic Microwave Background. When the James Webb telescope goes into operation astronomers will see galaxies too far away to have formed after the Big Bang and that when it will become apparent that there was no Big Bang.
Charley; interesting. I agree that the passage of time is relativistic on both small and large scales. We already know that from cosmic rays, which decay into Muons upon hitting upper atmosphere, and from doing experiments with atomic clocks near and far from massive objects Therefore, we cannot simply conclude accelerating universe, nor dark matter, because light which originates from centers of galaxies will have traveled more slowly and it will have experienced greater passage of time, relative to both us and the light that originated at the outer reaches of galaxies. However; Big Bang is almost a foregone conclusion. I am not talking about what had preceded it, b/c that is almost impossible to know. We can say with certainty that what ever preceded it was simply a different form of this universe; perhaps a different energy level. All the ratios between forces are so perfect, it could only have happened by shattering an existing closed system. Perhaps the Big Bang was just a decaying stage of the already existent system which went from higher energy, to lower energy state.
The Big Bang has been proven. Denying it is pure ignorance. However whatever caused it is up to your beliefs. Most Christians nowadays do believe in the Big Bang. They just say god caused it. I just stay agnostic/atheist.
But all of the evidence leads to the big bang actually happening. That's why I say most Christians, at least not the zealots, do believe in it but they say God caused it. I don't see where it's that hard to believe. What if the universe is just cyclic and it falls back in on itself only to blow up again continuing its lifespan. It could've recycled many times before it was suitable for us or our life force could've lived on another planet in another galaxy in another universe but doesn't remember it because of the limitations. I like to keep my mind open but if you think some sky fairy made it then you have every right
I dont even think there was space as we know it because there was no time so it must just be nothingness beyond the boundary of the big bang if you could ever get to the edge and go further than the universe has expanded youd probly be frozen in time
I have always my doubts with the theory of BigBang. A Universe out nothing? There to Option for me: 1. The Big Bang Theory is totally wrong. 2. A Creator made the Universe
fester01 I don't know, it is only the other option, because the Universe is so perfect and nothing came out of nothing, nature is not working like this. I do not believe in the big bang Theory it could be also a fluctuation of something, like a water drop.
The universe is the creator, the universe is God. One day we will discover the origins and i bet is nothing anyone has imagined, yet we are getting good and coming up with theories which end up to be true.
You should have doubts, every physicist has doubts about most everything, it´s a theory, scientists have to have doubts. Our knowledge would stop expanding if we don´t doubt. That´s why religion is poison as you demonstrated. And The big bang theory doesn´t say "from nothing". You just don´t understand it. Answer this: Are the black holes "nothing"? Funny how religious people see "error 404 not found" every time they don´t understand something, and go with a "invisible guy" instead.
The universe is going to expand until it's empty and then a new big bang will create another universe just like this one and so on. Why there is a multiverse
+Peter Paul Hmmm... what would say about this argument? Premise 1. A creator is always outside of the thing being made, for the creator can never be inside the object before it is made. The creator is thus an external agent to the object. Premise 2. A creator is always independent of the thing being made, for the creator can never depend on a thing that does not yet exist. Premise 3. The existence of the object is always dependent on a creator, for without the creator, the object would never exist. Premise 4. The creator of an object always comes before the object, for an object cannot be made by a creator that does not yet exist. Conclusion: If God is the creator of the universe, then He is outside and independent of the universe and He also existed before it. If He is the creator of the universe, then He can also never be objectively or experimentally verified from within the universe through the scientific method. Do you even realize that, based on the above conclusion, you actually *want* there to be proof/evidence of God's existence (as in physical proof of his person) inside the universe? Because if there is, then you can actually argue that He's not the creator of the universe, but rather a creature or a product thereof... and yet you guys readily and frequently hold the absence of physical evidence for God (God himself and not the work of his hands) inside the universe as your chief reason for questioning his existence. That's not very clever you know. I suppose you guys have never given thought to any of these things, have you? Do you understand that if you don't find any physical evidence of God inside his creation, that He may exist outside of it? In other words, it's creationists who *don't* want to find physical evidence of God's existence inside his creation, not atheists. Atheists would love to find evidence of his existence inside the universe.
+Ferdinandt Your whole argument assumes that the universe is created. In particular, in premise 3 you assume that everything has a creator. So for your argument to have any merit at all, you would have to prove that your premise 3 is in fact true. But so far, we don't even have to read your conclusion or past that, as it is completely unfounded.
Andreas Müller O this is an old post. I've made several adjustments to it since then. The premises relate specifically to a creator and the object created. If the universe had a creator, then the conclusion will follow. What's wrong with premises 4 exactly? Without the subject, the object can't exist. This is not confined to humans as such. It can be anything causing something else to come into existence.
The clock started ticking when......everything began....it ticked and tocked when we were in the making. I know my grammar is not well to do. But think about this as much as you would like....life is life...some turn to science. Some turn to faith....if you believe in what you feel then you will believe it....No one knows the answer.....thats why it's called LIFE.....live life your way...and don't have regrets because.....you only get one😁
Ajith A X or if there is a "creator(or creators)" people are beyond ignorant to think they can interpret an omnipotent being's thoughts. It's especially ignorant to assume that mankind has written down thoughts of a creator in a language that could be understood by man. Also, any book that is passed down through generations by copying it with writings is highly unlikely. Before written language the Bible(a)/understandings would have been transferred through the ages through oral story. Considering that eyewitness testimony is notoriously unreliable I would be be very skeptical of a story passed through ages by word of mouth. That's like a game of telephone at its most extreme. I choose to be agnostic. No proof there is or is or is not a creator. The creator just may happen to be the universe. Maybe a universal consciousness that uses life to observe itself.
you guys think universe came out of nothing yeah all humans being the same all of us have hands legs face eyes fingers and ect ... you think that's a coincidence ? you think that came out of nothing ???!!! GOD EXISTS
Legs face eyes fingers and etc.....Whoa, no shit! Just like,...monkeys, cats, elephants,...and etc! Fucking amazing the similarities given that there are no connections. Good observation (shitty argument).
DNA cannot be without proteins and proteins cannot be without DNA. And the average number of cells in your body is very near to the number of galaxies in the universe and then number of stars in each galaxy is approximately the same as that number. Some of the most brilliant scientists in the world believe in God and even Albert Einstein did.
To say before the big bang there was nothing is the same as we used to believe that earth was flat, the center of the universe, and everything revolved around the earth....!!!!! We simply don't know. This is a far better answer.
+Aryan Sassani As the Bible states, there is One God and One Mediator; the Supreme Being always was and always will be. There came a point when God felt like sharing the joy of existence and having some other entities to talk to so He formulated methods of creating life. In the beginning that plan was referred to as `The Word`- each complex formula necessary for a molecular Universe as well as the millions of codes that would define each form and function of existence. God`s first creation was the Messiah, The Lord`s Chosen Servant who would upgrade society and bring the Messages of God to the human race each generation as God`s only representative. God is non-molecular and omnipresent - everywhere at all times, so He does not take physical form. God created the Universe with a powerful blast of sound and other types of waves that followed their coded programming and settle into various phenomena like matter and energy, then He created life from the raw material of Love. The Creator would continue to create because matter wears out and decays; the vibration would fade eventually; God designed the Universe so that better futures would evolve. Existence tumbled into the void. The loop was at the end of the cosmos; the last event; the withering separation of light into weak & strong nuclear energies. Gravity, the powerful sister, stood helplessly by - the vacuum stole its grasp on the disappearing particles. Her yielding attractive brother, the electromagnetic host of awareness gently listened to the strings and contemplated the music of the dying universe to its last vibrating strand, the one-dimensional dancing filament pleading for rebirth. Gravity became a notion - a callfor assistance, and then was joined by the timid host to turn the oscillating loop around. They were the Yin and the Yang, substantial and insubstantial seeking an inhabited pinpoint to direct, one of six types of quark that could cause light to shine as a plume of electrons to feed the build-up of energy created by the movement between the two realms of being and non-being where dimensions meet. The absolute imperative, the Creator made some changes and allowed chaos and attraction to touch. By His will and His Word, the explosion of existence roared; vibrations sprang forward on a data-filled river of time.This Universe, this splendidly seeded field would grow once more, thrive, then decay as the once-enthusiastic energy would inevitably become tired like all living things - its consciousness would one day long for dissipation, not appreciating its creation nor expecting rebirth. The cycle of the living Universe with its crops of civilizations, each with its own Heaven and Hell after each its own Judgement Day, would repeat endlessly however because that which has been created will never be un-created...adjustments are made and the design will evolve, striving to get closer toimpossible perfection. God can step in and re-boot the system at any point; He is omnipotent, self-aware, and He exists outside of relativity, space, and time without visual form since He is everywhere at all times maintaining all of His creations throughout the vast Universe.
What a great documentary! Imagine if billions of years from now, as the Andromeda galaxy is colliding with the Milky Way, some civilization from Andromeda discovers one of the Voyager probes?
Wow!, John Hurt narrating on The Universe, it doesn't get much better than this. John Hurt a true national treasure, and is sorely missed.
Right on. I can't get through some videos on here because the narrator's voice is just irritating.
Made a good Doctor in Dr who too 💜
Allah! There is no god but He - the Living, the Self-subsisting, Eternal. No slumber can seize Him nor Sleep. His are all things in the heavens and on earth. Who is there that can intercede in His presence except as he permitteth? He knoweth what (appeareth to His creatures As) Before or After or Behind them. Nor shall they compass aught of His knowledge except as He willeth. His throne doth extend over the heavens and on earth, and He feeleth no fatigue in guarding and preserving them, For He is the Most High, the Supreme (in glory).
10 - Surat Al-Raad: “It is He who shows you the lightning, causing fear and hope and who brings up the heavy cloud. And the thunder declares His glory and His praise, and the angels too for awe of Him; and He sends them thunderbolts and smites with them whom He pleases, yet they dispute concerning Allah, and He is mighty in prowess.” [13:13-14]
@@averyhakes7729 0w⁶
Kane himself, The Nostromo's Executive Officer, explains Galactic distances and more.... how fitting!
Rest in peace John Hurt.
You were the perfect narrator for this documentary. You are a part of the cosmos now...
Ummm he was part of the Cosmos when he was alive too... 😂
Rest in Peace, John Hurt. You (and your amazing voice) will be greatly missed!
regardless of any arguments in the comments here, nobody can deny that he narrated the shit out of this
True but that dose not mean we can’t stop listening to him!
So many great movies. 1984, aliens, V for Vendetta.
Midnight Hoss Yep, you read my mind. 👍👍👍
Spoony Love Did anyone force you to watch this video? No? Then shut up and relax: you only have yourself to blame, since you CHOSE to watch this video. Go watch something else and keep your profanity and intolerance to yourself.
My respect and salute to the creators of these documentaries. The research, the filming, the editing... Fantastic.
The voice of John Hurt is the story by itself
Kane. The crew member, Kane. He had something attached to his face. We couldnt get it off. Later it seemed to fall off and die. It must have laid something in his throught. Some sort of embryo... um...
@@ajcook7777 you wanna read your own message before calling David snobby.
The actor, j.hurt...passed?
My dear watson,eloquently said ,what are you eluding too,I'm guite a simpleton
@@ajcook7777 The girl that runs Animalogic does this to me unfortunately. I love her content but her gesticulations and head nods and constant dadjoke one liners edited into grand slam factoids... She always lets the cam linger on her self satisfied enthusiasm too long after each line, too. Even the way she closes her lines with a huge pitch drop gets me. She's just too over the top fermeeee... Love what she's doing though and hope she keeps it up. We need more channels devoting their efforts to naturalism and conservation.
Wow I used to tape this show on VHS-now that's old and since we know so much in the 21st century this is obsolete
Jesus Christ bruh 🎉
Anyone else have a tough time watching stuff from over a decade ago? Knowing the advancement in what we know and can see in the universe today?
Yes.
Any physicist that writes a book on physics actually does that, they tell you a brief history of physics for the first half of the book and spend the latter half of the book with their thesis now that they've given you and an idea of where their field has come from so you can understand where their thesis/idea of theirs will in fact take us to...
Sooooooo, I'm kinda used to old information being explained because sometimes we find we went right when we should've gone left and having knowledge of the previous path helps us decipher where we went wrong.
Without the advancements of yester year we wouldn't have today's advancements... Never forget where you came from so you speak.
Hi, I'm from the future.
@@spiritualopportunism4585 any advice on the Bud Light Virus??
One day , it will all end, it feels like we are some kind of science project.
Agreed..look at this movie called The I Land on Netflix if you can..get back with me on your thoughts..
Well, I want to say something here that popped up when I read your comment. We are all Spiritual. It's eternal spiritual energy throughout all creation. Your own spirituality is unique and we can either accept it or deny It, but either way you go, it is still unprovable and is in the theoretical field. The fact that we can see, speak, have emotions etc.
etc. etc. readily reflects our spiritual side. The fact that we feel and express our emotions is evidenced by our individual souls.
That's our unique special side that
Is expressed in our life decisions
throughout our lives.
Our physical life tenure is only an undetectable spark in time compared to the age of our own planet (4 1/2 billion years) but we are part of it and for a necessary reason. It's the necessary reflection of the Spiritual side.
Regardless of the tenure, both have to exist. This is also why I firmly believe in reincarnation.
So, we are unique, have a place and purpose in our creation and existence. We just need to learn how to get along and beat out evil.
That's what it's all about.
@jessee sky
You hit one point here when you mentioned good and evil. Did you know or even realize that good and evil both must exist?
I falls under the unwritten law of opposites. Nothing physical or spiritual can exist without the opposite also existing. For example: If everything was Good,
Then we wouldn't know what Bad was. If everything was Bad, then we wouldn't know what good was..
If everything was physical, then there would be no spiritual and likewise if everything was spiritual,
Then there would be no physical.
There is God and there is also the devil. So where do we go from here? This is getting into what is called Quantum Physics.
@jessee sky Baby - have your keyboard repaired, shove your Satan up your filthy
rear entry ( where your "brain" is located ) and : back to square one ( kindergarden ) ...
And keep your hatches down - the Behemoth is at the door !
dropbox.com/s/i6p2ur3l06f27xu/Behemoth%20ante%20portas.jpg?dl=0
@jessee sky oh boy, 2000 year old crazy writings got you hooked on fairytales while the world has evolved.
Sự sáng tạo tuyệt vời. Kênh hay đem lại nhiều hữu ích
Wow! Thank you for uploading this! Anything narrated by John Hurt is a treasure....
i love these type of documentaries , I feel like I should get a certificate of completion for watching them, and a minor degree after watching about 50 :)
John hurt is a legend from Contact and Alien
I really believe in aliens
One of his best is outlander
@@johnepiceno3268 me too.
And 1984
@@mrssmith3872 Yep
I play this to go to sleep who else does this
Yep
"All of the energy and matter that existed still exists. Matter does not create energy of itself. The actions of matter enable energy to become manifest".
Matter *is* energy. Energy *is* matter.
Energy is the mass of the matter multiplied by the speed of light squared.
or... we could just gracefully die with our universe
Or we could watch God change it 😉
We never die, the only thing that dies is mankind. We are one with the universe and will always be part of this creation
Yes Trenton, you have to sacrifice your life to dark peaceful universe ! Then you will see the light of the Goat at the end of tunnel !, Is this enough for you ?
Finally somebody gets it
Good stuff. Thx for uploading quality stuff :)
Our entire known universe is filled with opposites. Hot/cold, night/day, love/hate. But it goes well beyond into physics. I think we can all agree gravity is the strongest force we know of as humans. I believe gravity has an equal an opposite force. Dark energy, or Antigravity. Gravity itself takes more mass to become stronger. It only stands to reason that a very large area of space with zero mass, could produce its own force. It's as simple as thinking of two containers linked at the bottom by a tube. If you fill one of these containers up with water, then the two will equalize as gravity pushes the water down. Antigravity, with the enormous absence of mass, has overpowered gravity and is ever accelerating the galaxies and stretching the space between them. we as humans are see to believe creatures. Humans are never in direct contact with this force at work. It's on such a huge scale between the opposing forces for us to even imagine it at work. We also don't live in an environment without mass, so we have never seen the force work first hand. Think of the oh so popular ball on a tarp analogy. Where the ball pulls the tarp down and represents gravity as it bends space time. On the edges of our known universe antigravity is so strong it pulls that tarp upwards. And puts a pulling affect on everything that gets closer. This would mean that the universe could actually slow down and become stable one day. Unless empty space never ends and we are torn to shreds. Only to await another bigbang.
Yes gravity is the strongest thing. The guy in this video said the stupidest thing ever said "Gravity is weak if you don't believe me push your friend off a 12 story building". Says it with a straight face.
@@bruceh92 gravity is the cause of a black hole in which nothing can escape not even light or time. Gravity sounds pretty strong to me.
@@SteveWard151 yes absolutely.
Great documentary this .. Well worth watching this episode if you dont get to watch the others.
The universe will go completely dark
It will die too
Nothing is forever
No it won’t weirdo
No thing is forever, not even time...
Nothing is anything
In the beginning before the universe had any form you can say that it potentially existed in every form. Every potential universe existed until only one did.
Hey 👋 Thank you for such an amazing Content !!! 🌊❤️🌈🔥🌎🌏🌙🪐 !!!!
I Love this kind of documentaries. Awesome Job!!
The question of where 'we' came from is very interesting to me. By 'we' I mean the energy that was the singularity of the Big Bang that was transformed into all the stuff in the Universe including us.
As far as where the Universe is going is not nearly as interesting a question as the first.
'empty' space contains random energy bursts that literally appear out of nowhere (no where as in we cannot explain where they come from). That random burst of enegy at the quantum level is what sparked the big bang.
I have a theory myself but I'm so confident in its accuracy I refuse to share it on a UA-cam comment.
I personally have a vague, "loosely" held belief/opinion... that "everything", is infinitely "scalable" in either direction (small to large).
Once, we had no real understanding of what "things" were made of. Then, we learned of molecules... and, as our technology advanced, improving our capabilities to see "into" smaller and smaller scales... we learned that those molecules were compromised of atoms, and those were compromised of even smaller particles... etc.
I don't believe there is necessarily any end to "how far this can be taken".
"Theoretically"... any "thing", can be cut in half... then, the half can be cut in half... over and over again to infinity.
No matter how small you go... half of "something", is never "nothing".
I think that (it's entirely possible that) the same is true in the opposite "direction".
Subatomic particles combine into atoms... atoms combine into molecules... molecules combine into "things"... things combine into... (?)... bigger "things" (?) Perhaps, also to infinity.
If a quark were "sentient"... then, from its perspective... the atom it is a part of, may appear as vast as a galaxy... and the molecule the atom is a part of, may appear as infinite as a "universe".
I'm reminded of the scene in the movie "Animal House", in which Donald Sutherland's character invites them to "smoke some pot", and the conversation... "Wait... so... you're saying that, one molecule in my fingernail... could be an entire universe? ... "
We ponder about whether or not there could be "other" life in the universe... when in fact, we can't even say for certain that our universe isn't merely a single molecule within the larger "structure" of some other living organism.
We could be the microbes in some other creature's gut... human caused "climate change"... could simply be nothing more than the symptoms of a stomach virus that creature is experiencing.
The size, scope, duration (etc) of space and time... are relative to the "observer". We "measure" (just the "observable" part of) the universe as billions of light years across (unreachable distances)... and as having existed for billions of years, and forecasted to exist for trillions more.
From our perspective, these are vast, barely conceivable measures of space and time.
But, to the "sentient" quark I mentioned earlier... even in a short lived particle (such as are created in a particle accelerator, and last only nanoseconds)... could the space and time which it perceives not seem equally "vast", or even infinite?
"Our" universe (for all we know)... could be analogous to the event of a single bubble within a pot of boiling water. How many such bubbles exist in that pot of boiling water... either at any one particular "point" in time... or over the entire span of time during which the pot of water is boiling?
We speculate that our "bubble", is larger than we can ever observe... but, still "wonder" if anything might exist outside of it (all of the other bubbles)... but, I seldom hear anyone asking, "what might be outside of "the pot"?"
I think that "infinite scalability" is the answer... both the infinitely small... and the infinitely large.
The infinite measure of space and time experienced by our "sentient" quark, is but a nanosecond in "our reality"...
Couldn't the trillions of years that our universe will exist, be no more than a nanosecond from the perspective of any "consciousness" that exists in a "reality" outside of it?
And, couldn't our entire universe ... and everything that happens within it... be just a "microscopic" event amongst an infinite number of other events just like it?
Likewise... couldn't that larger reality, outside of ours... also be just one of an infinite number of the same.... etc, etc, etc... ???
@@bobinthewest8559 understood. Super scary when we think of the Universe this way tho’. There’s just so much we don’t know!
Bob in the West I’ve considered this and even shared this with others and people say I’m crazy. Or they just don’t like to think about it because in that regard we are as insignificant as an individual sub atomic particle created and destroyed on a whim. I used to always ask what if we are just part of a larger being? Like if you look at the universe and collection of galaxies doesn’t it kinda look like a circulatory system? Also the way that it’s expanding and growing sort of like we expanded and grew as we aged. It’s an interesting concept that I would be inclined to buy into.
SO SAD HOW SUCH A BRILLIANT MAN , COULD BE GIVEN SUCH A CURSED BODY!!! R.I.P MR. HAWKINGS... YOU WILL NEVER BE FORGOTTEN!!!!
@Justin Collins He will never be forgotten by God, although he will wish he had been.
Carl, just journeying through.
@Justin Collins Everyone must face God in judgement.
@Justin CollinsI take no pleasure from people being judged by a holy God.
I point out this fact and I am wrong? He was warned a number of times. There is nothing anyone can do if someone dies in unbelief.
By the way hell is not open yet, people are reserved in darkness until they are resurrected to be judged for every word, thought and deed.
It would be good for you if you heeded the warning of wrath to come.
Carl, just journeying through.
One could argue that his ailment helped in getting him to realize his "role" in cosmology and waste no time in his research due to the fact of his very real illness.
P. S. - SCIENCE is no place for religion. One is factual laws and means based on very real & tangible evidence. While the other is 100% faith based, belief in something you absolutely cannot see/touch/smell/hear etc.
@@carljones8334 think about how much more knowledge you could have about stuff that matters if you didn’t waste your time believing in fairy tales.
Also Rest In Peace ✌🏾 John hurts don’t know who he is but y’all love him so.... 🕊
Can I get your meaning behind that.?
From the center of almost any explosion, material will expand from the center at an increasing rate until fuel is burned, or expended. Only then the slowing occurs.
This guy narrated me right out of my clothes.. what a smoothe cool voice 👌🏻
Lol
THAT voice? Lol
Attenborough now that’s a voice worth crying over
lol
I have two questions
#1 For religious people:
- If God created everything, who/what created God?
#2 For science:
- If the beginning of everything started with the big bang, what caused the big bang? Meaning, what was before the big bang?
In other words: What is the beginning of everything? My mind can't grasp the explanation ''nothing was at the beginning...'' it's too easy... Neither God created everything because it comes back to who created God... it's an endless chain...
I need something more solid than God or the big bang...
[112:2] Say, He is Allah, the One, Allah, the Independent and Besought of all. He begets not, nor is He begotten, And there is none like unto Him.
meaning that there is only one god, Allah, he is infinite, absolute, and all creatures, spiritual, animate and inanimated, are in need of him while he is in need of no one, Neither he was born nor he is the father of any one and there, Allah is uncreated and there is nothing similar dowards his creation nothing like it
Nor Syafi Ahh yes let ancient book help us. Someone should actually write something to benefit humanity.
You just talked yourself into an impossible riddle. However the world works, we ALL obey the laws of physics. That includes you. Your rant makes no sense as a result.
These are questions no human can answer, after all none of us have been there to witness it, now have we?
Lucy Cause has to stop at one point else doesn't make sense. God is the first cause.
Penzias & Wilson got the Nobel Prize for this discovery! The "snow" on your old TV, if you're old enough to remember that? Amazing!
30:00 Glass Blowers are Magical! lol
your mom is magical
@@dkmorris713 bruh
Lot more of magic in this video 😂
Amazing, when I know more I'll send for you.
50 billion trillion miles from earth. In which direction exactly? And how do we know this?
You have the internet, and it's been 3 years, have you researched it yet?
Or waiting for someone on a youtube comment to give you some basic classes astronomy?
Because even this video that describes how they observe what they're talking about, still evades you.
If life on earth took trillions of years to develop today's lifestandard as we know it and we all start with the same big bang at the same time, how is it possible that we think alliens are much older and far more advanced than us? I think there only can be an equal lifeform, or a lower lifeform. That's my logic brain. Or some planets took less time to develop. But than it can't be a better developed place, than earth i believe.
Explain please? Somebody?
Anybody?
I had this on tape when it first aired
Such a good documentary
winglessang31 but not real only God can give us life and take it not stupid science 🧬
My top voice of all time
R.I.P. Stephen Hawking :(😪😪
ua-cam.com/channels/vHqXK_Hz79tjqRosK4tWYA.html
i would of loved to of been able to meet that man.. one of my idols..
👎
He is still alive. didnt you know he was the first person to have his brain downloaded??
Makes you wonder what we will discover next. Amazing
Great. Loved this
Thank you Mr Hurt
BG radiation hit baldy pretty hard;)
BG radiation..... Band name, called it.
Jimmy you can even get a cancer by exposing the Big Bang background radiation, so pls cover your head when you go out day or night !
Very nice.. Contact is a great movie, seems appropriate that he should narrate this.
Why do we ask these questions when we can't even get along
That's not sciences problem
@Joe Jack I believe that's just part of being human. We have to ability to make earth a living hell. We can start making the world a better place by not putting warmongers into positions of power.
because that's what we are and that brought us so far where we are now... rivalry, competition and thirst for domination is in our blood and is essential for our evolution, despite what communist trash tells you!
21st century was bloody as hell, 2 world wars followed by the cold war, but that also crated most rapid scientific and technological advancement in ALL HISTORY! We started 21st century on horse back and ended walking on moon FFS...
DarkTV , it is partly, Hitler used evolution and survival of the fittest Which Yes, strictly speaking in not scientific, as the reason to exterminate a certain group of people and bring about a aryan race. Much of So called science, has unscientifically pushed God out of the equation, thus dispensing with moral accountability, giving some the mistaken idea that they can inflict pain and suffering on others with impunity.
Fast forward 2000 years and this will be considered science mythology
Before the big bang… If there was nothing, how do you know it was there or not there? Can you measure nothing? This is circular reasoning. Pretzel logic.
Howdy Doody stupid
@@williamwatkins2538 Stupid says Noddy? Perhaps you could explain why your tiny mind thinks this is a stupid question. Hes spot on, we DONT know! Anything before about 10-32 seconds is just guesses..Stupid:/
Watkins why are you so angry?
We're all beings of light. Everything and everyone is connected and a part of us. There is no such thing as death. Only a change of worlds or dimensions I guess to be more specific.
Universe : I’m infinite
Me: not even a spec of dust 😭
Kilgharrah voice, the best.
I live in Kentucky.
When I watched this I just heard someone say "Gooooooooood" for 50:56. Anybody else get that dub?
Theres a lot of interesting documentaries out there but this one is pretty good.
Everything came from nothing, now that’s incredible, incredible that this is believed.
Then chaos turned to order, then formed it's own laws. Must be true, because it's taught in school, and scientists have never got anything wrong ever.
Carl Jones exactly, merely stating that something is fact over and over and over again, does not in itself, make that something, fact. If they say it enough times, maybe they think that we,ll abandoned our own power of reason and logic, reject what the evidence, left to speak for itself screams at us, and eventually accept and believe that the naked emperor is wearing clothes, that everything came from nothing. Not this cookie
@@IsleofWightBushcraft I am coming at this from a Christian viewpoint, you may or not agree with my beliefs, but we have both come to the same conclusion.
That is, we are being misled in the name of science.
God made the universe you bulshit!
@@dewaldsteyn1306 Is there any need for such hatred?
The universe is a dynamic stream of matter in a void. Like a riverflow... Just look at the motion of laniakea.
Anyone ever stop to thinkthat it is the annihilation of matter and antimatter that could explain the super expansion in the early universe
NO! WALDO CAUSED IT ALL
I'm just thinking if matter and antimatter was at one point condensed let's say to the area of the size of our own one single Galaxy but there was an entire universe full of matter and antimatter and it was all touching itself close enough to annihilate itself upon each other wouldn't that create such a violent and turbulent explosion that it could possibly explain the super expansion of the entire universe think about it have you ever played with simple firecrackers like the old-fashioned bobcat little firecracker no imaginebillions and billions and billions and trillions and trillions of billions of billions or trillions of billions and billions or trillions and trillions and trillions of of billions of those little firecrackers going off all at the same time I'm pretty sure that would eventually cause a massive bubble of explosive expansion and it could also explain the erratic behavior of the universe I think we are overthinking everything
@@garymun420 just think that anyone can create anything out of nothing. It's a matter of what imbeciles are who will believe that imbecile. The more limited the idiot is the more limited the believer of the imbecile and all of their imbeciles will follow themselves as their idiot ducklings. They can also be the genius trying to believe themselves in nothing out of a small something that is not in any existence and only exists pertaining to their IMBECILIC foolishness of themselves. Unacceptable!. What is the potential explosion that caused the universe to expand and life to exist on planet Earth can be thought of as something as simple as building a campfire and using a lighter to start the flame and then causing that explosion by dropping that lighter inside that fires explosion yourself out of nothing and being believed that you are not the cause of the fire. BELIEVING that it was someone else in ultimate insanity and the imecile truly believes their lunacy by their conveinence. They then go to the conveinence store and inform everyone that the explosion by themselves that caused caused the forest fire and all lives llost was the wind instead of themselves. Where all believe that imbecile trying to evade their IMBECILIC responsibility. Who am I, I'm NOT that imbecile who started something that isn't there and the insane did by deranged demented conveinence evading their pathetic existence. I'm that creative artist IMBECILE. They're the catalyst of that fire and the IMBECILE MIRACULOUSLY to avoid their lunacy confusions. What idiot believed the idiot by their idiocy conveinence evading their pathetic existence? The idiot exactly like themselves who did not prevent the forest fire by simply not having a simple glass of water to extinguish the explosion. I know that I am not to blame for that pathetic imbecile that all of their IMBECILES believed in their insanity and all imbeciles are. Do not confuse me with your pathetic little imbecile idiots. They're the cause and effect of the explosion of their LUNACYSHITISM. Exclude me from your IMBECILE little duckling list permanently idiot in evading their pathetic existence. DUMBFUKER ENOUGH TO BELIEVE your IMBECILE not my anyone in your pathetic existence. It's time for all dumbfucker to include themselves in that forest fire by evasion and go die in their own blaze that they're all the cause and effect of and by themselves. Do not include me in your PATHETICSHITBIYCHYSKANK ORGANIZATION IMBECILE STRANGERS. KEEP YOUR IMBECILE who confused me as their PATHETICSHITBIYCHYSKANK self to evade who THEY'RE and who they've PATHETICSHITBIYCHYSKANK been. Fuck no you're not blaming me for your pathetic existence and LUNACYSHITISM FOR yourselves believing your pathetic existence. For I am that Burn unit ICU nurse who extinguished your FICTITIOUS WITCH BURNING IN SALEM FOR EXAMPLE IMBECILE MASSACHUSETTS AND GATHERED AN ARMY OF ANGERED PEOPLE AGAINST YOUR PATHETIC EXISTENCE WHO WANTED TO OBLITERATE YOU SKANKYSHITBITCH CALLING AND TREATING ME AS IF I BECAME YOUR PATHETIC SELVES. I AM THAT BRILLIANT EXPERT GENIUS AGAINST ALL OF YOUR ABYSS OF INSANE DELIRIUM STRANGER ENEMIES. GO BURN YOURSELVES NOW IMBECILES. GO AHEAD AND BE THE CAUSE AND EFFECT OF YOUR CHILDS SUICIDE AND GET THE FUCK OFF OF MY COAT TAILS STAY OFF REMAIN OFF PERMANENT IMBECILE. GET THE FUCK OFF OF MY CHILDREN LIARSHITSKANKYBITCH DUE TO YOUR PATHETIC IMBECILES AND NOT MY ANYONE. I'm that Burn ICU unit professional who chose to state, angered army against the DELIRIUMED they're all not worth slaughtering in THEIRSHITBITCHYSKANKY FICTITIOUS witch Hunt in pathetic SALEM again for making a mockery of their Mass hysteria history of mass hysteria murders of mainly intuitve highly intelligent women AGAINST little man with his little woma in THEIRSHITBITCHYSKANKY self guilt of themselves as imbeciles. It's unacceptable. You're still on your pathetic witch Hunt FUCKEDUPSHITSKANKYBITCH STRANGER RABIDSHITSKANKYBITCH Salem for example. The people of the United States of America sane people did anger against your LUNACYSHITISM AND DELIRIUMS AGAINST ALL THAT YOU CAUSED ME AND MY FAMILY IMBECILES DESERVEDLY. WHO CAUSED THAT SALEM WITCH HUNT AGAIN IN SALEM AGAINST ME BY FICTION? CHRISTIANITY! You now make a mockery of mass hysteria murders of mainly intuitve highly intelligent women Salem and to me it's REPULSIVE. Of course you're not sorry because you're REPULSIVE REPREHENSIBLE PATHETIC INFERIORITYSHITBITCHYSKANK LIARSHITSKANKYBITCH RABIDSHITSKANKYBITCH ARMY OF DELIRIUMED DELUDEDSHITBITCHYSKANK STRANGERS. GET THE FUCK OFF OF MY COAT TAILS STAY OFF REMAIN OFF PERMANENT FIRM REPULSIVE REPREHENSIBLE PATHETIC INFERIORITYSHITBITCHYSKANK LIARSHITSKANKYBITCH RABIDSHITSKANKYBITCH ARMY OF STRANGERS PREDATOR TERRORIST DESERVEDLY DISRESPECTED BY ME. KEEP YOUR DELIRIUMS IMBECILE..WHO YOU TRYING TO THINK AGAINST WHAT I KNOW PATHETIC INFERIORITYSHITBITCHYSKANK? WHO ARE CALLING AND TREATING ME AS YOURSELF FUCKEDUPSHITSKANKYBITCH RABIIDSHITSKANKYBITCH STRANGER WOMENCUNT INFERIOR DRAMAQUEENSTWATS? KEEP YOUR PATHETIC WARNEDSHITBITCHYSKANK STRANGERS PSYCHOSESSHITBITCHYSKANKYISM LUNACYSHITISM INFERIORITYSHITBITCHYSKANK IMBECILIC FOOL LIARSHITSKANKYBITCH VEHEMENTLY DESPISED BY ME. YOUR CHILD FOR EXAMPLE KILLED THEMSELVES AS A FORM OF REVENGE AGAINST PATHETIC EXCUSES FOR YOURSELVES NOT DUE TO MY ANYONE. GET THE FUCK OFF OF MY CHILDREN LIARSHITSKANKYBITCH RABIDSHITSKANKYBITCH KILLEDSHITBITCUYSKANK POMPOUSSHIT VIOLATING PREDATOR TERRORIST DESERVEDLY DISRESPECTED BY ME AGAINST KNOWN PATHETIC LUNACYSHITISM. DO NOT CALL AND TREAT ME LIKE I BECAME YOUR PATHETIC WARNEDSHITBITCHYSKANK IMBECILE MIRACULOUSLY DELIRIUMED DELUDEDSHITBITCHYSKANK PSYCHOTICSHIT NOTHING
YOU'RE NOT TO LIKE ME. GO AHEAD AND BE THAT RABIIDSHITSKANKYBITCH ARMY WARNEDSHITBITCHYSKANK STRANGERS PSYCHOSESSHITBITCHYSKANKYISM UPON YOUR PATHETIC GRAVES NOW AGAINST YOURSELVES. THAT ARMY AGAINST YOURSELVES WERE ACCURATE TO WANT TO OBLITERATE ALL OF YOU SKANKYSHITBITCH WARNEDSHITBITCHYSKANK STRANGERS BY ME.
KEEP YOUR PATHETIC WARNEDSHITBITCHYSKANK FUNERALS NOW AND FEAR YOUR LIARSHITSKANKYBITCH MEMORIUMS AGAINST THE TRUTHFUL FACTS AGAINST ALL KNOWN RABIIDSHITSKANKYBITCH STRANGER ENEMIES WARNEDSHITBITCHYSKANK STRANGERS NOW IMBECILES. FEAR MY POWER AGAINST YOURSHITBITCHYSKANKY IMBECILE INFERIORITYSHITBITCHYSKANK LIARSHITSKANKYBITCH VEHEMENTLY DESPISED BY ME DESERVEDLY ACCURATELY GUILTY KNOWN FUCKEDUPSHITSKANKYBITCH STRANGER. FEAR WHAT YOU ALL ARE. PANIC FOR WHO'VE YOU'VE BEEN AND THIS BURN UNIT ICU PROFESSIONAL EXTINGUISHED THAT POTENTIAL FIRE AGAINST YOUR RABIDITY.
GET THE FUCK OFF OF MY COAT TAILS STAY OFF REMAIN OFF PERMANENT FIRM RABIDSHITSKANKYBITCH INFERIORITYSHITBITCHYSKANK.
I teach theology and found this interesting.
Just for conversation. Im curious what a theology teacher would postulate coming before a "big bang" expansion beginning, after a never ending expansion heat death of the universe, and why God might make lur universe that way.
12 or 13.6 Billion years ago? I can tell this is an old documentary :p
Yep.
Why? They find out the Earth and universe is even older than that?
@@justinpettit3432 I haven't watched this in a number of months but I'm assuming it's because they reference the universe being 12 billion years old. We in 2019 know it's older and have for over a decade, so it tells me they made this doc. Maybe in the 1990's or early 2000's 😂 before they had current scientific knowledge of it's accurate age. Hope I answered your question.
@@runechuckie ua-cam.com/channels/vHqXK_Hz79tjqRosK4tWYA.html
And yet your too stupid to realize, what does that matter?
“I” who knows the absence of the universe refers to consciousness which is existing with “thinking” but is independent of thinking.
Those certainly are all words.
We know nothing. Life is too short :(
I wonder what materials and construction would be needed for a black hole probe if it's expected to survive more than a few seconds beyond the event horizon. And how would it transmit any findings/ data?
Anyone?
For any creationist wishing to present a logical defense to anyone who asks you for the hope that is in you, you are free to use to the following argument as you see fit. Whatever the case may be, know that you have a logical reason to believe in a creator.
From my general observations *between a creator and the object created*, I've noticed a number of general truths.
Premise 1. The creator of the object is not a physical property of the object, for the creator doesn't merge with the object and neither does the object merge with the creator. In other words, the creator and object remain separate from one another as opposed to becoming one inseparable unit.
Premise 2. The creator's existence is not dependent on the object. If it was, then the object should already have existed, which is obviously impossible.
Premise 3. The object's existence is always dependent, among other things such as the raw materials, on the creator, for the object cannot exist without the creator.
Premise 4. The creator always exists before the object.
Premise 5: Christians believe that God exists and that He's the creator of the universe.
Therefore,
1. God is separate from the universe and He can also never be physically verified from within the universe via the scientific method because He is not a physical property thereof. (premise 1)
2. God is independent from the universe (premises 2 & 3), and
3. God existed before the universe (premise 4)
This conclusion was arrived at by deductive reasoning and is therefore either valid or invalid. Which means that, atheists will have to falsify the premises if they wish to invalidate the conclusion. The conclusion also does not disallow or impede God from manifesting Himself to us, as He can appear and disappear at will. I.e. He's entirely free to come and go in his creation as He pleases and we would not be able to scientifically prove it anywhere from within the universe. In fact, if we did find any physical evidence of God (God Himself and not his handiwork) inside his creation, then his nature and status as the creator of the universe would be in serious question. In other words, if there is physical evidence of God inside the universe, which can be verified through the scientific method, then I would question whether God is the creator of the universe or actually a creature and hence a product thereof. So, when atheists asks you for evidence of God inside his creation because they can't even find any, then you should rejoice all the more and even thank them for their work.
Please also remember that I mean physical evidence of God Himself (as in the creator) and not the work of his hands (as in his creation) when I talk about physical evidence of God. Creation itself testifies to God's existence, but He as creator should not exist inside his creation. Heaven is of course an entirely different matter, but I believe we will only understand that in the hereafter. Take care and God bless.
on the other hand you can't prove the creator based on the object reaction....the car is man made and for the car to prove it's creator cannot base it accordingly on how it reacts.
God exists and there's no doubt about that but I doubt God exists based on what Christianity tells us, thier theories are based on the miracles that happened on thier ancestors.
they measured the behaviour of how Jesus acted and they say he was God in thier eyes God is nothing like human I believe nothing that an object can discover and see
on the other hand you can't prove the creator based on the object reaction....the car is man made and for the car to prove it's creator cannot base it accordingly on how it reacts.
God exists and there's no doubt about that but I doubt God exists based on what Christianity tells us, thier theories are based on the miracles that happened on thier ancestors.
they measured the behaviour of how Jesus acted and they say he was God in thier eyes God is nothing like human I believe nothing that an object can discover and see
Sbusiso Hadebe Sorry for the late reply. I didn't initially want to reply, but I would like to get some clarity anyway.
Yes, just like programs inside cyberspace cannot prove that humans made them, we are also powerless to prove that God exists. That is why I believe He already manifested himself to us in the past and that He will do so again, but for the last time. I understand what you're saying and I agree with you, but I'm not sure if we're on the same page here exactly. To use your analogy of the car, I'm saying that it's impossible for the man to be a constituent material making up the car as if the man was a property of the car and nor is the car a physical attribute of the man as if it was a constituent material of the man.
It is quite possible to read out the proportions and the functions of a man, just looking at the functionality of a car...
Ferdinandt "we are powersless to prove that God exists "
True,however the universe and everything in it,proves the existence of God.
no creation =no creator.
creation =a Creator
The overall structure of our top-down Platonic universe, where monads are quanta
by Roger B. Clough (10/26/14)
Abstract
Here we briefly describe the universe as being simultaneously mental (as monads
or quanta) and physical (as bodies or particles of matter). These particles
or bodies also have a range of what Leibniz calls perfection, and they indirectly
interact such that a more perfect body makes a less perfect body more
perfect, the more perfect evolving toward the supreme perfection of the One.
The mental sphere (Mind) contains not only monads in the form of quanta
but a pre-established harmony (PEH) as well as forces (which are ideas),
which can act on them, of which there are two kinds: a) physical forces,
which act on mass (as linear momentum) and on spin (angular momentum)
and b) electrical forces, which act on the charge of a particle. Mind also
contains the powers of creation, reasoning, experiencing, and perception ,
and control. Mind controls matter just as mind controls the brain.
Introduction and discussion
The platonic universe consists of two halves of a single entity
which we might call the Absolute : comprising the One and the Many,
or Self (subject) and Other (object) , as in Fichte.
The structure is completely cybernetic, by which we mean
that all causation is mental and top-down.. The purely mental or subjective One
or singular ruling creator and governor, is a purely mental subject
(first person singular) . The Many, its monadic objects, consist of a
network of an infinity of mental monads, all alive and conscious to various
extents, as well as the physical bodies in spacetime described by them.
These bodies. while we call them physical, are actually phenomenal.
They move in spacetime only according to the pre-established
harmony (PEH), The PEH is not entirely deterministic. Higher
order living entities move in various degrees purposefully,
by what Aristotle called "final causation".
Life is a property of all of the universe of particles,
where by life we mean autonomous intelligence,
freely able to make its own selections at least according
to the PEH. This intelligence is that of Mind, and since
Mind causes all and creates all, it is Mind out of
which the Big Bang exploded.
Time and space are phenomenal, not actual entities, but instead are
simply the four dimensions of spacetime , x, y, z and t. These are
mathematical or phenomenal variables, not real entities.
At the same time, spacetime and the objects in it appear
as real when experienced, either by perception or measurement.
Thus Leibniz does not consider the everyday world as an illusion,
you can still stub your toe in it and perform experiments.
Leibniz thus calls this phenomenal world "well-founded".
Closing
We close by summarizing Plato-Leibniz's conception of the universe,
which Bertrand Russell dismissed in passing as a fairy tale-- a vain remark,
since Russell never proposed an alternate working model. Plato's
universe is cybernetic (top-down), which makes it largely analytic, except
for the fact that in the case of life, Aristotle's final causation
(purposeful action ) is invoked.
In contrast, Panpsychism seems, to this author at least, to be mob rule.
There is also Whitehead's metaphysics, but I prefer the computer-like
rationality of Plato-Leibniz.
So, to summarize Plato-Leibniz's universe:
1. The universe is governed on the large scale mentally and necessarily
(if we are to avoid conflict) by a single monarch (the One). This creates all,
perceives all, and causes all action mentally, not physically, through Plato's cybernetic,
top-down administration.
2. Here space and time only exist as spacetime, which is an artifact
(like a map) created locally by the presence of mass in particles or bodies.
Spacetime is not a reality, it is simply the mathematical path as
curved by the mass.
3. On the small scale, the rules of Leibniz's Monadology come into effect.
The universe is made up completely of physical matter in the
form of distinct and completely independent bodies moving
in spacetime according to the PEH , which is the practical form of the One's
control.
4. Each particle or physical body has two simultaneous versions:
in spacetime the body is a conventional physical body
but it also has a mental mirror version in mental space called a monad.
Monads are simply the quantum or mental forms of the particles.
5. Thus we have the One, which controls the Many (the particles
or physical bodies with corresponding simultaneous mental monads
6. The particles are behaviorally characterized through
through three indexes of force- spin, charge and mass.
Charge is a single pole of electromagnetic force.
7. Mass and spin are mechanical , with mass corresponding
to linear momentum and spin corresponding to angular
momentum of the particle about an axis. Thus each particle
is moved either by charge or by momentum.
8. This PEH is simply a top-down cybernetic (mathematical) structure based at the lowest
level largely on Einstein's relativity theories, as well as other deterministic theories
such as electromagnetic theory, and the broader, nonlocal (entangled)
and less deterministic theories of statistical mechanics and thermodynamics.
Physics has yet to recognize the nonlocal character of thermodynamics,
especially evident in its conservation laws.
--
Dr. Roger B Clough NIST (retired, 2000).
See my Leibniz site: rclough@verizon.academia.edu/RogerClough
For personal messages use rclough@verizon.net
"Science doesn't know everything - religion doesn't know anything."
- Aron Ra.
Depends on the definition of "know". The word Science comes from Latin and means knowledge, but till Auguste Comte everything was considered knowledge.
Religion doesn’t know shit except fairytales but presumes to know it all, if only I could live in blissful denial like they do
love aron ra.. seen alot of his videos - hat off to the man. would love to meet him..
@@adamarmstrong622 WHOSAYSYOUDONT???
the size of the universe is frightening. seriously. we are so insignificant. earth is only a grain of dust in the ocean.
If you build me a ship I'll take one for the team and fly into a black hole.
Lol my man!! You'd go down in history
So how would he report to the team what he discovered?
@@flymasterA he put a go pro on his helmet and do a live stream
I kill all of my subscribers. , wouldn't the black hole suck in the transmissions? 🤔
Or they could watch the vid in the parallel galaxy... 🤗👍
Telescopes look into the past?! 19:20. I’m gonna buy one.
YOU look into the past when you look at a star.
It may have burnt out yesterday, but the light from it will contiue to travel through space for thousands of years to come.
The truth is, none of us know how the universe came to be, or how life as we know it started. We can all have theories, ideas, religions and beliefs. None of us were there, none of us can be sure. I find people who claim they do know, extremely ignorant.
Great. stuff!
To say it grew from nothing, makes no sense to me
If space expands because of the mass that is in it, every time a human being or an animal is born space should expand
Thats hot how it works
Best scene ever 31:43 😂😂😂😂🤣
I wish I could live forever just to sit back an listen to all the knowledge an theories that astroligist and scientist have that's the only reason I would want to live forever
Amen
RIP John Hurt
Excellent watch
Young Lawrence!
i never understood why its so weird that universe is speeding up, the distance between masses is getting farther away so the effect of gravity is loosing strength therefore with distance apart from concentrations of mass things speed up
I like his West Virginia accent.
Ummmm....
I'm from West Virginia, this ain't it. He has a British accent.
@@jasminelanyard9326 I was joking sweetie.
Great video. Most of it is guessing but still....
girl..
If something created the universe, they what created that thing, and what created that,and that,and that, Nothing can come from nothing. The only logical thing is that im on a tv show like the Truman show and everybody is an actor. If this is true then PLEASE LET ME OUT! I don't wont to be on this show anymore.
+TestedModz What makes you think the other show would be any better than this?
Suraj Vengala
we watch particles appear, come from nowhere split, expand, and disappear non stop everywhere continuously.
Oh shut up LMAO!!!
Energy cannot be created or destroyed.
Brilliant!
What if every supernova is another Big Bang creating another universe?
nope, because space-time was already there **before** every supor nova
It's more likely that black holes are enterances to new universes and even that is unlikely. As far as physics goes though that is the closest you can probably get to what you are describing. Supernovas are just caused by large stars burning all their fuel and then being massive enough to collapse in and the following bounce back of the collapse is the explosion/supernova. Pimental Ferreira is correct as well, the stats that go supernova are already suspended in space-time
The stars that do go*
Then where did that atom come from?
Pear Aylions! Lol!
“Yes, reason has been a part of organized religion, ever since two nudists (Eve and Adam) took dietary advice from a talking snake.”
And look where that got us!
Snakes are very devious when giving dietary advice. The couple was too naive, they have been fooled...
The quark plasma apparently but as he Martin Rees says at the start we dont, cant and maybe never know. If people stop bashing CERN because of what the media dubbed it was looking for and im not going to say it but it was called the Higgs Boson really then we might find out and with that knowledge make the world a safer and more friendly place because we wouldnt have that real demon and false god MONEY. Organised religions were all invented by empires that were dying out and the people at the top of those empires jumped on the famous prophets of the day so they could hold on to a bit of power and pass that collection plate around and yes church is a charity but nowadays charities are big business and there is always some guy at the top that gets the BIG salary and or position of power. MONEY is the real devil we as a race of people dont really need it but it is how we have come to evaluate how powerful an individual is as well as ourselves and that is really a fiction a hyper reality the real powers that be have made us believe... I believe in GOD and Jesus and many prophets but creators except our GOD they were not....
Maybe we're looking at this in the wrong way. The infinite singularity was a point in spacetime that had ripped open the fabric of space. Maybe that infinitesimal point, under extremely intense pressure, actually popped and allowed matter/energy to "explode" into our universe?
God
God
God
God
God
God
God
God
God
God
God
God
God
God
God
God
God
God
God
God
Did not create the earth!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
BIG BANG "THEORY", NOT BIG BANG "FACT". DNA IS LIKE A COMPUTER CODE PIECE OF INFORMATION BUT GENETIC. ENERGY OR MATTER CANT CREATE THAT, ONLY AN INTELLIGENT SOURCE. NOTHING PRODUCES NOTHING HEHEHE.
@@djpsypher916 Idiot. Do you know what a theory is in science? Do you know what a body of evidence is? It's atomic theory not fact. Facts contribute to it. Do we have nuclear reactors and bombs? Might as well deny they exist. Who gives a shit about evidence and proof. You don't even understand the language of science and yet you dismiss it. That makes you a know nothing fuck who decides to lecture people on shit they can't comprehend!
Actually god created the universe. who else would make the big bang. Only he made it and made it like a clockwork to his grand design.
Then you did
@@djpsypher916 you obviously dont understand what theory means in a scientific sense. plus, typing in all caps doesnt make you right automatically. just says that youre a nutjob
“ We can unify all through the understanding that everything consists of bits of information, though that raises the question of where these bits come from.” - Vlatko Vedral
My information theory answers Professor Vedral's question - “...where did these bits come from?”
HOW THE UNIVERSE EMERGED FROM THE VOID
What Caused the Big Bang? Something from nothing.
“Everything is information” - Vlatko Vedral
James Rushing 6.30.16 LB, CA
This Creation Theory shows how information was first created; how law, existence, energy, matter, time and space, emerged from the Void and created the Universe.
THE LAW
The first law of identity: Identity Precedes Existence.
An identity must have two or more attributes to exist - an existent must be something before it is.
EXISTENCE
The Void had three attributes: the Void was necessary, sufficient and potentially the Universe, therefore, the Void had an Identity, and so, the Void had existence.
ENERGY
Upon having existence, the Void combined with the force of its identity and created a new and unique identity - the second law of identity.
The second law of identity: every existent has an identity and the force of its identity.
The Void, the Force of it's Identity and the First and Second Laws of Identity were the first Identities to be created.
Third law of identity
Now, the Void, the force of its identity and the first two laws of identity combined and created a new and unique identity - the third law of identity.
Third law of identity: no two identities may occupy the same location. Every identity seeks to maintain its identity.
This law is the source of the first expansion.
Matter
Next, these five identities combined to create the fourth law of identity.
Fourth law of identity: two or more identities may combine to create a new identity.
Time
Next, these six identities combined to create the fifth law of identity.
Fifth law of identity: time is created to “complete” each creation cycle.
Space
Space does not exist and never did. What seems to be space is the field of information bits that expanded after the big bang.
How quantum information emerged from nothing.
These were the first seven identities to exist: the void, the force of its identity, the first, second, third, fourth and fifth laws of identity.
These seven, unique identities, combined, according to the fourth law of identity, to create an eighth, new and unique identity; then, these eight combined to create a ninth; and these nine combined to create a tenth, unique identity, etc.
Where a=the Void, b=the force of the void's Identity, c=first law of Identity, d=second law, e=third law, f=fourth law, g=fifth law, h=new existent, i=new existent, etc. a+b=c>a+b+c=d>a+b+c+d=e>a+b+c+d+e=f>a+b+c+d+e+f=g>a+b+c+d+e+f+g=h>a+b+c+d+e+f+g+h=i>a+b+c+d+e+f+g+h+i=j>a+b+c+d+e+f+g+h+i+j=k>etc.
This Creation of Information Mechanism “cycled” for billions or trillions of years creating a “field of information” that expanded with each cycle, creating our Universe as a continuous “tape” of information.
THE BIG BANG
The Information Creation Mechanism filled the Universe to a maximum size and density, and then collapsed to a point of maximum density, and with a Big Bang, exploded, creating the second expansion of information, this time with “bits of information,” each “bit” containing all the information and energy necessary to create matter, the cosmos, and life, according to the Laws of Identity.
LAWS OF IDENTITY
First law of identity: identity precedes existence.
Second law of identity: every existent has an identity and the force of its identity.
Third law of identity: no two identities may occupy the same location, or, every identity seeks to maintain its location.
Fourth law of identity: two or more identities may combine to create a new identity.
Fifth law of identity : time is created to combine identities to create new identities . the universe is in a constant state of combining. creation takes time.
IMPLICATIONS
Everything is information
Everything is information is the Theory Of Everything
A is A, Existence Exists. What a thing is, determines what it does - Cause and Effect.
The Laws of Identity are Universal.
Information is Identity.
The Law of Identity, A=A , is also known as the Law of non-contradiction and the Law of the Excluded Middle.
A=A is the fundamental equation, and the source of Reason, Logic, Science, and, the source of Spiritually, Truth, Love, Freedom and Art; which are the values that create the deep, underlying unity of all that exists.
Information, combining and recombining, creating new information, according to the Laws Of Identity, is “the creation mechanism that created the universe.”
The Laws Of Identity control creation, design, evolution, and the now; making the Universe self-creating, self-contained and self-explaining.
The Force of Identity created the Laws of Physics that built the Universe and created life. Life was followed by consciousness and modern humans.
The Force of Identity was the First Force to be created, and is the creator of the Known Forces that created and govern the Universe. They are, in order of creation, the Force of Identity/the Electromagnetic Force, the Strong Force, the Weak Force, and the Force of Gravity.
Matter was created after the Big Bang, when the “Bits of Information” combined in all possible ways after the Big Bang. This was the Second Expansion.
There was a first and second expansion. One before the Big Bang and one after.
The Laws Of Identity are suited for life because they are the same Laws Of Identity that created life.
The Force Of Identity can be explained mathematically by an equation: A=A . This equation, A=A, allowed the discovery of physics as a way to know and apply the Laws Of Identity.
The Void and the Force of its Identity combined and created the Universe. The Universe and the Force of its Identity combined and created the cosmos. Life emerged from the combining of the cosmos with the force of the cosmos. Mind evolved from the ceaseless combining of life with existence according to the Third Law of Identity. Modern man appeared, not by accident, but by the Laws of Identity, created by the Void and the Force Of Its Identity.
A=A is the first equation and the Universal Constant.
The Cosmos, Life and Consciousness can be explained by the same equation, A=A, since they are a creation of the same Laws of Identity.
Understanding math is natural and crucial to human survival because math and humans are a creation of the same Law Of Identity.
We are all one with the Universe and the Creator of the Universe, because all that exists has been created by the same Laws of Identity.
James Rushing June 30, 2016
jamesloydrushing@yahoo.com Copyright James Loyd Rushing All rights reserved.
I think, therefore, I am.
René Descartes beat him to it, with a lot less mumbo jumbo in 1637.
The Big Bang Theory is based upon the assumption that the red shift of distant galaxies is caused by the Doppler effect. However, the red shift is not a Doppler effect. The Universe isn't expanding. The electromagnetic radiation is gravitationally stretched by all of the mass in it's past light cone. The relativistic effects produced are the same as if the galaxies were receding. The deeper we look into space the more time appears to slow down and the more space appears to contract. Eventually we see an infinity of galaxies which appear frozen in time and that is the Cosmic Microwave Background.
When the James Webb telescope goes into operation astronomers will see galaxies too far away to have formed after the Big Bang and that when it will become apparent that there was no Big Bang.
actually there was a big bang. and God caused it. there had to be a reason, a cause a controlled idea. and God was the force behind it
Charley; interesting. I agree that the passage of time is relativistic on both small and large scales. We already know that from cosmic rays, which decay into Muons upon hitting upper atmosphere, and from doing experiments with atomic clocks near and far from massive objects
Therefore, we cannot simply conclude accelerating universe, nor dark matter, because light which originates from centers of galaxies will have traveled more slowly and it will have experienced greater passage of time, relative to both us and the light that originated at the outer reaches of galaxies.
However; Big Bang is almost a foregone conclusion. I am not talking about what had preceded it, b/c that is almost impossible to know. We can say with certainty that what ever preceded it was simply a different form of this universe; perhaps a different energy level. All the ratios between forces are so perfect, it could only have happened by shattering an existing closed system.
Perhaps the Big Bang was just a decaying stage of the already existent system which went from higher energy, to lower energy state.
The Big Bang has been proven. Denying it is pure ignorance. However whatever caused it is up to your beliefs. Most Christians nowadays do believe in the Big Bang. They just say god caused it. I just stay agnostic/atheist.
[content deleted by me c:]
But all of the evidence leads to the big bang actually happening. That's why I say most Christians, at least not the zealots, do believe in it but they say God caused it. I don't see where it's that hard to believe. What if the universe is just cyclic and it falls back in on itself only to blow up again continuing its lifespan. It could've recycled many times before it was suitable for us or our life force could've lived on another planet in another galaxy in another universe but doesn't remember it because of the limitations. I like to keep my mind open but if you think some sky fairy made it then you have every right
Space was saturated with energy when the conversion happened if it did. And mass started to condense, and expand into the vacuum of space.
I blew a fart thats what happened
I dont even think there was space as we know it because there was no time so it must just be nothingness beyond the boundary of the big bang if you could ever get to the edge and go further than the universe has expanded youd probly be frozen in time
I have always my doubts with the theory of BigBang. A Universe out nothing?
There to Option for me:
1. The Big Bang Theory is totally wrong.
2. A Creator made the Universe
*****
1. I did not talk about a God, I said Creator.
2. Nature is forming always out something and not out nothing.
Andi Wolf
who , or what created the creator ????
fester01 I don't know, it is only the other option, because the Universe is so perfect and nothing came out of nothing, nature is not working like this.
I do not believe in the big bang Theory it could be also a fluctuation of something, like a water drop.
The universe is the creator, the universe is God. One day we will discover the origins and i bet is nothing anyone has imagined, yet we are getting good and coming up with theories which end up to be true.
You should have doubts, every physicist has doubts about most everything, it´s a theory, scientists have to have doubts.
Our knowledge would stop expanding if we don´t doubt.
That´s why religion is poison as you demonstrated.
And The big bang theory doesn´t say "from nothing". You just don´t understand it.
Answer this: Are the black holes "nothing"?
Funny how religious people see "error 404 not found" every time they don´t understand something, and go with a "invisible guy" instead.
Great science tv show.
Oooooold.
But good
The universe is going to expand until it's empty and then a new big bang will create another universe just like this one and so on. Why there is a multiverse
God reveals to those who r ready to serve
+Randy Lee excuses for being unable to prove God exists
+Peter Paul Hmmm... what would say about this argument?
Premise 1. A creator is always outside of the thing being made, for the creator can never be inside the object before it is made. The creator is thus an external agent to the object.
Premise 2. A creator is always independent of the thing being made, for the creator can never depend on a thing that does not yet exist.
Premise 3. The existence of the object is always dependent on a creator, for without the creator, the object would never exist.
Premise 4. The creator of an object always comes before the object, for an object cannot be made by a creator that does not yet exist.
Conclusion: If God is the creator of the universe, then He is outside and independent of the universe and He also existed before it. If He is the creator of the universe, then He can also never be objectively or experimentally verified from within the universe through the scientific method.
Do you even realize that, based on the above conclusion, you actually *want* there to be proof/evidence of God's existence (as in physical proof of his person) inside the universe? Because if there is, then you can actually argue that He's not the creator of the universe, but rather a creature or a product thereof... and yet you guys readily and frequently hold the absence of physical evidence for God (God himself and not the work of his hands) inside the universe as your chief reason for questioning his existence. That's not very clever you know.
I suppose you guys have never given thought to any of these things, have you? Do you understand that if you don't find any physical evidence of God inside his creation, that He may exist outside of it? In other words, it's creationists who *don't* want to find physical evidence of God's existence inside his creation, not atheists. Atheists would love to find evidence of his existence inside the universe.
+Ferdinandt Your whole argument assumes that the universe is created. In particular, in premise 3 you assume that everything has a creator. So for your argument to have any merit at all, you would have to prove that your premise 3 is in fact true. But so far, we don't even have to read your conclusion or past that, as it is completely unfounded.
Andreas Müller O this is an old post. I've made several adjustments to it since then. The premises relate specifically to a creator and the object created. If the universe had a creator, then the conclusion will follow.
What's wrong with premises 4 exactly? Without the subject, the object can't exist. This is not confined to humans as such. It can be anything causing something else to come into existence.
Ferdinandt There is no need to read premise 4 if premise 3 is wrong.
The clock started ticking when......everything began....it ticked and tocked when we were in the making. I know my grammar is not well to do. But think about this as much as you would like....life is life...some turn to science. Some turn to faith....if you believe in what you feel then you will believe it....No one knows the answer.....thats why it's called LIFE.....live life your way...and don't have regrets because.....you only get one😁
All these silly people pretending they know how it all began. Nobody knows.
Time is just human beings needing a label; time is constant humans are not
There is no GOD
Ajith A X or if there is a "creator(or creators)" people are beyond ignorant to think they can interpret an omnipotent being's thoughts. It's especially ignorant to assume that mankind has written down thoughts of a creator in a language that could be understood by man. Also, any book that is passed down through generations by copying it with writings is highly unlikely. Before written language the Bible(a)/understandings would have been transferred through the ages through oral story. Considering that eyewitness testimony is notoriously unreliable I would be be very skeptical of a story passed through ages by word of mouth. That's like a game of telephone at its most extreme. I choose to be agnostic. No proof there is or is or is not a creator. The creator just may happen to be the universe. Maybe a universal consciousness that uses life to observe itself.
No shit, Sherlock.
There are no gods
How for art thou knoweth so?
How do you know this?
very nice.
Only God know's what's out there
I agree.
We will never leave the earth!
we leave earth all the time
we will, earth will die at this rate, in billions of years, the sun will explode and become a red giant, thus devouring earth.
you guys think universe came out of nothing yeah all humans being the same all of us have hands legs face eyes fingers and ect ... you think that's a coincidence ? you think that came out of nothing ???!!! GOD EXISTS
The universe is under no obligation to make sense to you.
John Salvatore to the UK for your kind consideration and I was wondering if there
Legs face eyes fingers and etc.....Whoa, no shit! Just like,...monkeys, cats, elephants,...and etc! Fucking amazing the similarities given that there are no connections. Good observation (shitty argument).
DNA cannot be without proteins and proteins cannot be without DNA. And the average number of cells in your body is very near to the number of galaxies in the universe and then number of stars in each galaxy is approximately the same as that number. Some of the most brilliant scientists in the world believe in God and even Albert Einstein did.
To say before the big bang there was nothing is the same as we used to believe that earth was flat, the center of the universe, and everything revolved around the earth....!!!!! We simply don't know. This is a far better answer.
+Aryan Sassani As the Bible states, there is One God and One Mediator; the Supreme Being always was and always will be. There came a point when God felt like sharing the joy of existence and having some other entities to talk to so He formulated methods of creating life. In the beginning that plan was referred to as `The Word`- each complex formula necessary for a molecular Universe as well as the millions of codes that would define each form and function of existence. God`s first creation was the Messiah, The Lord`s Chosen Servant who would upgrade society and bring the Messages of God to the human race each generation as God`s only representative. God is non-molecular and omnipresent - everywhere at all times, so He does not take physical form. God created the Universe with a powerful blast of sound and other types of waves that followed their coded programming and settle into various phenomena like matter and energy, then He created life from the raw material of Love. The Creator would continue to create because matter wears out and decays; the vibration would fade eventually; God designed
the Universe so that better futures would evolve.
Existence tumbled into the void. The loop was at the end of the cosmos; the last event; the withering separation of light into weak & strong nuclear energies. Gravity, the powerful sister, stood helplessly by - the vacuum stole its grasp on the disappearing particles. Her yielding attractive brother, the electromagnetic host of awareness gently
listened to the strings and contemplated the music of the dying universe to its last vibrating strand, the one-dimensional dancing filament pleading for rebirth.
Gravity became a notion - a callfor assistance, and then was joined by the timid host to turn the oscillating loop around. They were the Yin and the Yang, substantial and insubstantial seeking an inhabited pinpoint to direct, one of six types of quark that could cause light to shine as a plume of electrons to feed the build-up of energy created by the movement between the two realms of being and non-being where dimensions meet. The absolute imperative, the Creator made some changes and allowed chaos and attraction to touch. By His will and His Word, the explosion of existence roared; vibrations sprang forward on a data-filled river of time.This Universe, this splendidly seeded field would grow once more, thrive, then decay as the once-enthusiastic energy would inevitably become tired like all living things - its consciousness would one day long for dissipation, not appreciating its creation nor expecting rebirth. The cycle of the living Universe with its crops of civilizations, each with its own Heaven and Hell after each its own Judgement Day, would repeat endlessly however because that which has been created will never be un-created...adjustments are made and the design will evolve, striving to get closer toimpossible perfection. God can step in and re-boot the system at any point; He is omnipotent, self-aware, and He exists outside of relativity, space, and time without visual form since He is everywhere at all times maintaining all of His creations throughout the vast Universe.
What a great documentary! Imagine if billions of years from now, as the Andromeda galaxy is colliding with the Milky Way, some civilization from Andromeda discovers one of the Voyager probes?