MBT 70 *** KPz 70 ( Kampfpanzer 70 ) - Demonstration

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 27 сер 2024
  • MBT 70 *** KPz 70 ( Kampfpanzer 70 ) - Demonstration
    The MBT-70 (German: KPz 70) was a 1960s German-U.S. joint project to develop a new main battle tank, which was to be equipped with a number of advanced features. It utilized a newly developed hydropneumatic "kneeling" suspension and housed the entire crew in the large turret. The MBT-70 was armed with a 152mm XM150 gun/launcher, which could use conventional ammunition and the Shillelagh missile for long range combat. By 1969 the project was well over budget and Germany withdrew from the effort, developing a new main battle tank on their own instead (the Leopard 2). In the US the development continued for a short time, until in 1971 when Congress cancelled the program. The MBT-70 is the failed predecessor of the Leopard 2 and the M1 Abrams, the current main battle tanks of both countries.
    MBT-70 (Main Battle Tank 70) (нем. KPz 70 ) (рус. Основной боевой танк 70) - совместный американо-немецкий проект по созданию перспективного основного боевого танка для вооружения армий обоих государств. Проект относится ко второй половине шестидесятых годов двадцатого века, основной целью проекта стало создание замены танку M60, способной превзойти перспективный основной танк СССР англ. Future Soviet Tank, FST, которым впоследствии оказался танк Т-64. В MBT-70 было воплощено множество оригинальных для своего времени технических решений, таких как низкий силуэт с расположением механика-водителя в башне танка, регулируемая гидропневматическая подвеска, применение комбинированной брони, дистанционно управляемая станция вспомогательного вооружения, и (на американском варианте) совмещённая с пусковой установкой управляемых противотанковых ракет 152-мм танковая пушка. Поскольку MBT-70 создавался как превосходящая система оружия (англ. superior tank system), его комплекс вооружения был рассчитан на поражение всех перспективных бронированных целей с обеспечением беспрецедентных (на 1965 год), в расчете на перспективу, показателей бронепробития по гомогенной стальной броне: 250 мм/60°/2000 м - при стрельбе бронебойным оперенным подкалиберным снарядом (БОПС); и 600 мм/0° - при стрельбе ПТУР «Шилейла». Несмотря на относительную успешность проекта, в сентябре 1969 года Министерство Обороны США пересмотрело своё отношение к этой совместной программе, в основном по причине её высокой стоимости. В результате, 20 января 1970 года совместный проект был прекращён, разделившись на две независимые национальные программы, американскую XM803 и германскую Leopard II.

КОМЕНТАРІ • 148

  • @RePlayBoy101
    @RePlayBoy101 8 років тому +187

    leopard 2 and m1 abramses daddy

    • @raiwserkoopa2221
      @raiwserkoopa2221 6 років тому +8

      If this was a modern design today, it would basicly be a leopard 2 and m1 abrams on steroids.

    • @joeb1185
      @joeb1185 5 років тому

      @@raiwserkoopa2221 NOPE

    • @raiwserkoopa2221
      @raiwserkoopa2221 5 років тому +2

      @@joeb1185 yes

    • @joeb1185
      @joeb1185 5 років тому +15

      @@raiwserkoopa2221 No, this project failed because the countries tried different approaches that didn't work for the tank or the countries, the tech for the tank was used and you are already looking at 2 versions of the MBT 70 on steroids, they are called Leopard and Abrams.

    • @maciejwisniewski2538
      @maciejwisniewski2538 4 роки тому +1

      It also shot missiles if im not mistaken

  • @greenalienfromspace
    @greenalienfromspace 5 років тому +57

    MBT-70 was way ahead of it's time, its design looks modern when I first saw it I thought it was a 1980 -2000 tank, I'm surprised

  • @ultor7654
    @ultor7654 6 років тому +46

    Amazing steel beast! Years ahead it's time!

    • @coleneyland8338
      @coleneyland8338 4 роки тому +3

      That’s all of German engineering

    • @canadianbaconeer3857
      @canadianbaconeer3857 4 роки тому +8

      It's technology was also the reason for it's failure, as the MBT-70 became less of an mbt and more of a technology demonstrator masquerading as a combat vehicle towards the end of its development. After the cancellation of the MBT-70 project, the US tried to make a cheaper version (XM-803) which removed some of the more advanced and expensive features, however this did little to lower the tank's cost and that project was scrapped as well.

    • @darnit1944
      @darnit1944 3 роки тому

      @@coleneyland8338 American gun, German engine, and many other messes created by both nations that ballooned the development cost

  • @blackstone777
    @blackstone777 7 років тому +61

    Weird tank. Driver was in the turret.

    • @flare9757
      @flare9757 5 років тому +3

      Nick C That is how they got such a small hull on that tank.

    • @SulphieX3
      @SulphieX3 4 роки тому +4

      im late but, i mean, if he looks out the hatch he will be able to see better

  • @fishbmw
    @fishbmw 4 роки тому +12

    What a shame this was shelved,best looking tank ever in my humble opinion.

  • @mishas2245
    @mishas2245 4 роки тому +5

    My frontrunner in World of Tanks Blitz. 50.47 tons of mechanical perfection and design excellence

    • @hanhphuc166
      @hanhphuc166 4 роки тому +1

      But it is severely nerfed to balance in the game

    • @411nightnheaven
      @411nightnheaven 3 роки тому +1

      Most nerfed tank in game

    • @dan-oh7jo
      @dan-oh7jo 3 роки тому

      I have it too. I love it and i hate it. In World of Tanks Blitz, its 60-70 percent weaker than the real MBT 70. This tank doesnt belong in that game, espeacially not to Tier 9. For example, instead 1500 Ps Diesel engine in Blitz it has only 800 PS engine. Instead of 70 kph, it goes 40 kph. Also, i am sure it has more penetration with the HEAT ammo than 330mm like in Wot. In real life, it would have minimum 500mm RHA steel penetration with the WEAKEST type of Heat ammo. (We are talking about a long 152mm Caliber gun) 330mm was normal for 1950, but never for later tanks.

  • @user-ht8bu1il8f
    @user-ht8bu1il8f 5 років тому +12

    Мощь!!! Классный танк 👍

  • @bradgolding6847
    @bradgolding6847 7 років тому +40

    This film is reversed. The driver was in the right front corner of the turret. Notice also that Pathe is backwards!

    • @largol33t1
      @largol33t1 6 років тому +9

      Prevents UA-cam's copyright from picking this up and blocking it.

    • @leopardfibel9572
      @leopardfibel9572 4 роки тому +1

      Rubbish. The driver was left front. Pathe is reversed on the opening shot only.

    • @spazzkill4092
      @spazzkill4092 4 роки тому

      Depending on the cameras angle. You can say he was in the left front if you see the tank from back.

  • @LastSoldat
    @LastSoldat 6 років тому +12

    Hi, what kind of music is playing on the background?

  • @Apex_Apeq
    @Apex_Apeq Рік тому +4

    impressive. i get this tank in mystery box on WOTB today...this tank was very good mobility. respect.

  • @du_nut_tuch_me4230
    @du_nut_tuch_me4230 5 років тому +3

    Man that Sweet 152mm gun...

    • @flare9757
      @flare9757 5 років тому

      _ DU_NUT_TUCH_ME _ Correction, 152mm XM150E5.

  • @hazeldaniswara307
    @hazeldaniswara307 4 роки тому +1

    You spin me right round baby right round like a record baby right round right round

  • @kthec1298
    @kthec1298 4 роки тому +3

    The MBT-70 is the failed predecessor of the Leopard 2 and the M1 Abrams
    wrong, the xm-1 (general motors version and crysler verion) was the predecessor for the abrams not the mbt 70, it may look kinda abramsy but it is its own project

    • @slenko6541
      @slenko6541 4 роки тому +1

      Yeah but i games is gud af

  • @bobnicleson1503
    @bobnicleson1503 Рік тому

    Appropriate music. Excellent movie.

  • @agt155
    @agt155 3 роки тому

    What a crazy idea putting everyone in the turret. Modern tank designs are the complete opposite with everyone in the hull.

  • @hazoish7670
    @hazoish7670 6 років тому +10

    Kpz is the m1 abrams dad

    • @flare9757
      @flare9757 5 років тому

      Hazoish ? Not quite. It was the program that came before the M1 program, both of which where trying to replace the M60.

    • @ancientwarrior3482
      @ancientwarrior3482 5 років тому +3

      Imperial Shocktrooper KPZ-70 is a father to both Leopard 2 and M1 Abrams

    • @ashenwings3106
      @ashenwings3106 4 роки тому

      The abrams was built off its schematics so technically the kpz70 and mbt70 is the father of the abrams

    • @kthec1298
      @kthec1298 4 роки тому

      @@ashenwings3106
      no they both where from the XM-1 project not the mbt 70

  • @himmlstoss
    @himmlstoss 6 років тому +9

    I know what i want for christmas

    • @jooot_6850
      @jooot_6850 6 років тому +1

      nah get an abrams, they cost similar amounts (if you are rich enough to buy it anyways) and they have much better capabilities with the 120 and all that.

    • @epicexcutionner334
      @epicexcutionner334 6 років тому +1

      take leo 2 because m1 abrams is just crap

    • @flare9757
      @flare9757 5 років тому

      Colin Thorneycroft epic executioner Take neither. If you can buy a M1 or a Leopard, it is just a couple more pennies in the bucket to upgrade the equipment to be among the most modern, or atleast better than the Abrams and Leopard. Besides, neither Leo nor Abrams has a retractable 20mm AA turret or an autoloading 152mm Cannon/Launcher.

  • @leoleo9254
    @leoleo9254 4 роки тому +3

    Меготехнологичный образец военной техники.

  • @thescratchyscratch7848
    @thescratchyscratch7848 5 років тому +1

    I seriously wish they could have made this tank project work

    • @flare9757
      @flare9757 5 років тому

      THE Scratchyscratch! It did. Just not well enough to be worth replacing the M60 with this.

    • @nenadgardilcic9003
      @nenadgardilcic9003 5 років тому +1

      @@flare9757 Maybe it was too expensive so the parliaments of both countries redirected both armies for a cheaper solution according to official sources.

    • @clevethunder676
      @clevethunder676 4 роки тому

      Not worthit, it uses composite armor, Chobham armor was way better

    • @darnit1944
      @darnit1944 3 роки тому +1

      @@clevethunder676 Spaced armor, not sure about composite

  • @leinad3305
    @leinad3305 6 років тому +8

    What is the name of the music played?

    • @bismarckkiller7390
      @bismarckkiller7390 5 років тому +1

      Its called stupid you dont need to be listening to stupid shit like this

    • @wales3813
      @wales3813 5 років тому +5

      Down The Drain by Graevinon

    • @clevethunder676
      @clevethunder676 4 роки тому +1

      @Squidward Tortellini Gucci gang doesent count as music

    • @Kevvvinus1
      @Kevvvinus1 4 роки тому

      Bismarck Killer being a twat ain’t name of the song

    • @stirfry3069
      @stirfry3069 4 роки тому

      Squidward Tortellini I’m dying

  • @dustydave2819
    @dustydave2819 8 років тому +2

    The tanks being built at the beginning of this video are not MBT70, the front hull hatch for the driver can be seen, MBT70 didn't have one in the hull.

    • @jooot_6850
      @jooot_6850 6 років тому

      It prevented the driver from getting disorientated so it'd probably be the actual version used

    • @flare9757
      @flare9757 5 років тому +1

      Colin Thorneycroft If they put a driver in the hull, that would ruin most of its advantage. It was so short because the driver was in the turret.

  • @getanearlyd8276
    @getanearlyd8276 5 років тому

    at 0:50 and 2:11 onwards its a MBT-70/KPZ-70, but from 1:04 to 2:09 its a XM 803 which was a chear variant of the MBT-70/KPZ-70 because it was too expensive

    • @flare9757
      @flare9757 5 років тому

      GKS Basically scrap the 20mm AA turret and targeting equipment.

  • @jasonblunt5551
    @jasonblunt5551 4 роки тому +3

    Nothing like in wot blitz

  • @MrJetill
    @MrJetill 7 років тому +2

    That beat is awesome! Who is it?

  • @dmitry8676
    @dmitry8676 4 роки тому +3

    No one see that this video is mirrored? The driver must be on left side of this tank.

    • @dustydave2819
      @dustydave2819 3 роки тому

      and Pathe logo back to front on those clips too, someone's avoiding copywright.

  • @weibrot8324
    @weibrot8324 7 років тому

    It was an creapy project but now we have the Leopard and the US have the M1 Abrams

  • @Xyecoc22899
    @Xyecoc22899 2 роки тому +2

    красавчик а не танк😍🥰

  • @hepatimutimu9099
    @hepatimutimu9099 4 роки тому +1

    Out of it the turret moves round while the driver stays forward that's sum I haven't seen

    • @kthec1298
      @kthec1298 4 роки тому +1

      that was one of the reasons they didnt like this tank, driver got sick because of that

    • @paoloviti6156
      @paoloviti6156 4 роки тому +2

      @@kthec1298 it was not only that because there was too many problems starting with the mechanism of 20mm cannon that was always jamming including the overcomplicated system or the autoloader handling caseless ammunition, the ammunition also had a tendency to "cook-off", or fire prematurely. In plain English it was ruined by the use of too many untried and unproven technologies not to mention the bickering between metric and inches that delayed very much not to mention the incredible cost overrun. A fuck up of first magnitude....

  • @noahweintraub746
    @noahweintraub746 4 роки тому +1

    Was this a heavy tank or a medium tank?

    • @TJSmith03
      @TJSmith03 4 роки тому +2

      Noah Weintraub it's a main battle tank, hence "MBT" 70. You can probably compare this to a medium tank, but the more modern beasts aren't really classified as mediums and heavies anymore

  • @ancientwarrior3482
    @ancientwarrior3482 5 років тому +2

    This tank could still easily be in service, just improve it's armor and ammunition and it will be totally fine

    • @ashenwings3106
      @ashenwings3106 4 роки тому

      It's armor isn't as effective as our modern day tanks but it's gun is way more effective it's a 152mm cannon that is bigger than any other modern tank gun today it makes up for it's lack of armor especially APFSDS rounds.

    • @zegunner7906
      @zegunner7906 4 роки тому +2

      actually the driver was feeling weird when the turret was turning

    • @m1a1abramstank49
      @m1a1abramstank49 4 роки тому +3

      Ancient Warrior When the armor was just crap when the T-72 and T-64 were introduced with a low velocity 152mm cannon it’s gonna price problems. The Abrams and Leopard 2s are simply better

    • @m1a1abramstank49
      @m1a1abramstank49 4 роки тому

      EDUBAxton Redemption It’s bigger but it doesn’t have too much velocity.

    • @dan-oh7jo
      @dan-oh7jo 3 роки тому

      @@m1a1abramstank49 The germans had a 120mm smoothbore in developement at that time. So it would be no problem to put these on MBT 70 A2.

  • @kutejikashi1959
    @kutejikashi1959 6 років тому +4

    Why did it fail?
    It looks and seems to work very well

    • @epicexcutionner334
      @epicexcutionner334 6 років тому +2

      Edgar Alvarez because it was ahead of its time

    • @kutejikashi1959
      @kutejikashi1959 6 років тому

      epic excutionner
      And?
      Goberments Didn't want to be ahead of the enemy on military things?

    • @epicexcutionner334
      @epicexcutionner334 6 років тому +1

      Edgar Alvarez it s not the germans who stopped the other countries did

    • @kutejikashi1959
      @kutejikashi1959 6 років тому

      epic excutionner
      Oh lol, I get it

    • @getanearlyd8276
      @getanearlyd8276 5 років тому +5

      @Edgar Alvarez, the MBT-70 and KPZ-70 failed because it got too expensive and then the west german government pulled the plug on further development on the KPZ but the US continued and built a cheaper variant which is the XM 803 (the MBT-70 with out the 20mm gun on the top) but it still didnt meet the requirements so they started a new but similar project called the XM-1 which eventually led to the M1 Abrams

  • @user-ww3ox1gk7h
    @user-ww3ox1gk7h 4 роки тому +11

    Wot Blitz?)

  • @Nazar_Han
    @Nazar_Han 5 років тому +2

    Ambrams????

  • @alfonsoruiz760
    @alfonsoruiz760 5 років тому

    Anyone else notice everyone in this video was wearing sunglasses?

  • @capricorn7391
    @capricorn7391 6 років тому +2

    Does anyone know the name of the song ?

    • @BHZRD-em8gn
      @BHZRD-em8gn 4 роки тому

      Down the drain by Graevinon. You're welcome :)

    • @rwduece122
      @rwduece122 4 роки тому

      Its actually broke for free - night owl, not Down the Drain.

  • @abdghd8474
    @abdghd8474 6 років тому +4

    This music scard mr

  • @chyngyzanarbaev1678
    @chyngyzanarbaev1678 3 роки тому +4

    9ый уровень урон 570 перезарядка 14секунд (Wot blitz)

  • @ashenwings3106
    @ashenwings3106 4 роки тому

    This tank was a prototype that the Germans and Americans were building together but it was cancelled however the Abrams and leopard 2 were built off its schematics well the Abrams at least im not sure about the leopard

  • @bosa377
    @bosa377 6 років тому +4

    If u are in love with tanks, u should come and join me, I play “Warthunder” which is a game where u play historical vehicles both land air and seaa

    • @garrettray3620
      @garrettray3620 4 роки тому +1

      Bet

    • @garrettray3620
      @garrettray3620 4 роки тому +1

      My username name is garrett1235

    • @wanikmal800
      @wanikmal800 4 роки тому

      I bet World Of Tanks is better mate

    • @glintwing
      @glintwing 4 роки тому

      @@wanikmal800 was better* ... Its not anymore. By a long shot.

  • @joseortega6744
    @joseortega6744 6 років тому +1

    Jornet and boom

  • @bradgolding6847
    @bradgolding6847 7 років тому

    Must be old age, sorry! The driver was in the front left corner of the turret!

    • @XDPK-zx1yv
      @XDPK-zx1yv 5 років тому

      The video is flipped from right to left so youtube couldnt pick up the video and copyright it

  • @osiris6099
    @osiris6099 5 років тому +4

    KPFPZ 70 in WOT BLITZ

  • @Aislanzito
    @Aislanzito 6 років тому +2

    Estes tanques estão no WarThunder tier 6

  • @chamudithafernando7878
    @chamudithafernando7878 5 років тому +5

    Why Germans didn't build that tank in ww2?😔😢😭

    • @Barri2410
      @Barri2410 5 років тому +4

      +chamuditha fernando in my opinion, there's 2 things
      1. The technology maybe still 'unavailable' (MBT/Kpz-70 was from around '60, which was about half of Cold War. While WW2 were back in '40)
      2. The MBT-70 was a joint development between West German and US to counter new tanks on the Warsaw Pact side

    • @clevethunder676
      @clevethunder676 4 роки тому +1

      its too modern and versatile you instagram normie

    • @dan-oh7jo
      @dan-oh7jo 3 роки тому

      Simple: They didnt need it. Germany in WW2 had anyway problems with their steel and oil ressources. It would be time, money and material wasting to put them against M4, Cromwell, T-34 and IS-1. Also, no chance to put an ATGM in a tank back in the 40s. They didnt even have real ATGM, spaced armors and neither a compact 1500 PS engine back in the 40s. The 1100 Ps for Maus for example was half of the size of the whole MBT 70 tank.

  • @Kadett221
    @Kadett221 3 місяці тому +1

    /set

  • @user-eb2yy2bg6w
    @user-eb2yy2bg6w 2 роки тому +1

    6545

  • @Darjeeling1258
    @Darjeeling1258 4 роки тому +3

    Real☞Good tank
    Wotb☞nub tank

    • @andylynx007
      @andylynx007 3 роки тому

      Not really, the driver got motion sickness due to his position in the turret. Also, both Germany and USA has different doctrines with their tanks (simply, different preferences). So, they drop it and the US got Abrams and Germany got Leopard.

  • @JASON-KILLER-YT
    @JASON-KILLER-YT 4 роки тому +1

    This tank, I have, is better. There are two types that are destructive and sack

  • @yakumoyukari4405
    @yakumoyukari4405 6 років тому +1

    Think that MBT-70 could be much better than Abrams but MBT-70 was too expensive :(

    • @XDPK-zx1yv
      @XDPK-zx1yv 5 років тому

      Yeah the kpz/mbt 70 would have been much better if it was successful

    • @flare9757
      @flare9757 5 років тому

      OptimalOptimus50 OK, then take a MBT-70 and kit it out with the newest tech and equipment, then it would beat a M1. Maybe give it a twin 20mm turret as well, instead of just a single 20mm in the turret so they can use the two guns if they want to.

    • @ashenwings3106
      @ashenwings3106 4 роки тому

      Honestly if you put it's 152mm gun on the Abrams it would be perfection.

    • @ashenwings3106
      @ashenwings3106 4 роки тому

      The Abrams has its flaws it's gun is only 120mm vs 152mm but it's armor is better than the kpz70 and just and tough as the leapord 2.

    • @kthec1298
      @kthec1298 4 роки тому +2

      @@ashenwings3106
      a bigger gun isnt automaticly a better tank, the bigger the gun the faster it breaks therefore it cost more to maintain one tank, the russian where trying to put a 152 gun on the t-80 (OBJ 292) bigger gun bigger ammo = less ammo and its heavier
      the germans now want to upgrade the leo to an 130mm gun but 152mm is at the time only used by artillery guns

  • @yakudza428
    @yakudza428 4 роки тому +1

    Че за дерьмовое качество

  • @glvxy1695
    @glvxy1695 7 років тому +3

    Русские есть?

  • @ultr0fury519
    @ultr0fury519 5 років тому +1

    ._. Viva el T.A.M alv :v

  • @AyoubusMagnus
    @AyoubusMagnus 6 років тому +2

    wAW WHY WHEN I LOOK AT THE KPZ 70 FROM THE FRONT I SEE A JAGDPANTHER ?
    well those germans know how to make stuff.

  • @MisterMonster89
    @MisterMonster89 Рік тому

    Автор Канала пересмотрел Блейд )