Tina Brown explains Prince Harry and Meghan's challenges | Salon Talks

Поділитися
Вставка

КОМЕНТАРІ • 119

  • @gdm1979
    @gdm1979 Рік тому +68

    Even me, a Brazilian, easily understand that joining the British royal family might completely restrict someone’s life. We saw what happened to Diana. There is no way Meghan was naïve and did not understand that marrying Harry would be a huge challenge. These comments are just silly. This lady lives in Lala land…

    • @kategurang7695
      @kategurang7695 Рік тому +1

      Delusionals, making excuses for an over 40yo woman 🙄

    • @hedaheda1609
      @hedaheda1609 Рік тому +2

      @@lizp6859 I wouldn't call it submission, more of a strict hierarchy. And a strict hierarchy requires at the same time both - discipline (which is not the same as submission!) and adequate, stable self-confidence, similar to what is in the army.
      The specifics of the royal family will be supplemented by strict protocol and etiquette, but Meghan should already understand this as a former embassy employee and a student of international relations 😉

    • @henryyogen563
      @henryyogen563 Рік тому

      You sound like a fool..... It's a practical thing, not a theory.... Experience and knowledge are two different thing

    • @here_we_go_again2571
      @here_we_go_again2571 Рік тому +2

      Diana, Fergie and Sophie had a tough time of it, as did Catherine.
      Catherine was with William a long time before he proposed.

    • @ingridkivi3024
      @ingridkivi3024 Рік тому +2

      Megan is Out to Lunch

  • @jacquelinevanwickevoort2649
    @jacquelinevanwickevoort2649 Рік тому +51

    Nobody forced her to be Harry’s wife.

  • @normalozano9719
    @normalozano9719 Рік тому +83

    Hello!!! She was dependent on her dad and her 1st husband Trevor let's not forget that. She is not a self made person.

    • @jannythomas3104
      @jannythomas3104 Рік тому +12

      She's not much of anything.

    • @dianaortiz9775
      @dianaortiz9775 Рік тому +5

      She is self made. Yes, her father raised her and paid for her education but she became a successful actress. Megan was worth $3 million dollars when she met Harry. Not bad for a tv actress.

    • @DevolComitatus
      @DevolComitatus Рік тому +1

      @@dianaortiz9775 This says more about how overpaid actors are (even minor ones) than her being self-made. She was doing Hallmark movies and occasional 'hot girl' bit roles as a jobbing Z-lister before she got onto Suits, which bumped her up to D-list. All the while her father and 1st husband supported her financially.
      She's only a self-starter at using men to get ahead and social climbing like a monkey on steroids. Some feminist icon.

    • @normaaguirre-boehm6662
      @normaaguirre-boehm6662 Рік тому +9

      No brother and sister said father supported her because all she was getting small parts in shows until she was able to get a part in suits. Father even paid for her plastic surgeries. She was always dependent on someone else

    • @debikaip3699
      @debikaip3699 Рік тому +2

      Trevor is Markle’s second husband!
      not her first !
      Joe Giuliano is Markle first husband,
      Markle eloped with Joe because Markle was pregnant .
      Joe’s parents didn’t want Joe to marry Markle,
      I believe Joe’s parents saw threw Markle, what we see today.🤷‍♀️
      Joe’s parents had the marriage annulled, they payed💰💰💰Markle out of this marriage, & I have heard that joe’s parents raised the Joe’s daughter!
      I also heard Samantha adopted a baby girl that was Markle’s, Markle’s didn’t want , the baby,
      Markle wanted to work on her career.
      So off Markle went to work on her acting career, I believe she quit to soon .

  • @Marlen137
    @Marlen137 Рік тому +79

    I am sure she had done her homework very well. All that's happening I believe was planned by her even before her marriage. I can't believe that an almost 40 year old women didn't know the responsibilities that came by marrying unto the the royal family.

    • @jannythomas3104
      @jannythomas3104 Рік тому +18

      She knew alright, she had plans and they didn't work out so she turned on them.

    • @SN-bl6xm
      @SN-bl6xm Рік тому +10

      Especially a woman who was obsessed with Diana since teenager age. Rachel knew very well about the Royal family.

    • @kategurang7695
      @kategurang7695 Рік тому +5

      She knew but chose to be ignorant

    • @Katya67
      @Katya67 Рік тому +1

      Not only did Meghan KNOW the responsibilities ... she fulfilled them.
      She just wasn't told that she was supposed to be William and Catherine's sacrificial lamb as well.

    • @Meche672
      @Meche672 11 місяців тому

      Even if she didn’t completely understand, Harry was there. He could have tell her/she could have asked. Remember-he was inside the family, she wasn’t. So, benefit of the doubt, MM could have asked but most importantly, Harry could have teach her about what to expect.

  • @mikesweetwater3209
    @mikesweetwater3209 Рік тому +16

    I do not agree with much of what Tina is saying and I have ready her book. For one, meghan was very much used to depending on a man, she used her first husband Trevor before she got suits. And then she used Cory the Canadian chef to get her known in the Toronto social scene so she has very much used men to elevate her position her entire life. Also I’m not going to feel sorry for H & M because they had to choose what palace they were going to live at for FREE! Why would we pity them, they had a life of luxury

  • @irenawaite7171
    @irenawaite7171 Рік тому +28

    She had no intention in staying from the start.

  • @livhemingway2224
    @livhemingway2224 Рік тому +32

    When Markle stalked Harry, she knew her 40 odd yrs wasn't going to get her any more significant acting work. She wasn't a successful actress here in the states, hollywood had never heard of her. She wanted to be a movie star but that could never happen she wasn't talented enough. She eventually was able to get a role on the cable show suits shot in Canada, playing a character similar to her own. Interestingly she couldn't play a character outside of herself. That's why at 40 she was never going to make it. Chasing down Harry was her only chance to be noticed and unfortunately for the Brits, it worked.

  • @CoumbaKaa
    @CoumbaKaa Рік тому +28

    Loved Palace papers . No gossip but a real analysis of how the institution works

  • @kathykautz3425
    @kathykautz3425 Рік тому +24

    The British were very receptive of her. She's the one who didn't want to conform she wanted to change things her way.

  • @raquelcarreras818
    @raquelcarreras818 Рік тому +10

    It’s petty. Pathetic he’s reduced himself to court jester. If only he had one more sausage

  • @mamahustru
    @mamahustru Рік тому +6

    Funny how on that balcony photo you showed, Meghan is as white as everyone else.

  • @bonniegrafstein5701
    @bonniegrafstein5701 Рік тому +23

    Woman of independence??? BIG Carrier? Fact check please...her father her paid her way totally. She married #1 after living with him for years..he paid .In Toronto she was finally making a regular paycheck. Began her dirty search for a bigger, richer sugar daddy.

    • @lekis5975
      @lekis5975 Місяць тому

      Meghan had EIGHT JOBS; actress, blogger, writer, public speaker, designer, model activist and volunteer. Does that sound like a woman who was looking for a sugar daddy. In contrast, Kate never worked after graduating, she pretended to work...in retail, and then hang around for 10 years waiting for William to propose. Kate was the stalker

  • @kategurang7695
    @kategurang7695 Рік тому +22

    It's not that Meghan wasn't allowed to have a voice. She was not allowed to have a "political" voice I believe is the correct way to put it. She was allowed a platform during her time with the RF to be influential about humanitarian causes of the monarchy. She was allowed a platform to use her background for representation of people of color. Turns out she had a totally different agenda altogether.

    • @lekis5975
      @lekis5975 Місяць тому

      @Kategurang Nonsense Meghan never raised any political issues, besides, housing (homelessness) childcare (Early Years), Environment all these are POLITICAL issues.
      Meghan fundamentally struggled because she was REJECTED and RESENTED by the royals. They resented her popularity; she was told to make herself small. Charles refused to fund her, she was told to go get a job, Harry's allowance never changed upon marriage or upon Archie's birth; William's allowance rose from £2 million to £3 million.

  • @mareavoce1272
    @mareavoce1272 Рік тому +15

    I think bringing Harry up to believe he was equal to William hasn’t, unfortunately, prepared him well - as we now see.
    Great analysis by Tina. Shame Harry didn’t use Tina to write his book.

  • @shirleyoneill9291
    @shirleyoneill9291 Рік тому +13

    Megan CAN work. The Queen told Megan in the beginning.

  • @richardabisson2954
    @richardabisson2954 Рік тому +39

    Meg did not have a big career and she was always dependent on a man.

    • @dorothysharpe5853
      @dorothysharpe5853 Рік тому +2

      Do you have a career

    • @richardabisson2954
      @richardabisson2954 Рік тому +2

      @@dorothysharpe5853 yes i do

    • @conniefoss3382
      @conniefoss3382 Рік тому +1

      EXACTLY 💯 💯 💯

    • @conniefoss3382
      @conniefoss3382 Рік тому +1

      I have been on my own since 16. I put myself through college and I am a military veteran. I did all of this without a man. And this F$#King b@#ch wants to tell me about being a feminist. They both need to shut up and get a life.

    • @thisblackgirlslife
      @thisblackgirlslife Рік тому

      Right, because you’ve done soooo much research🤡💯

  • @sueb1676
    @sueb1676 Рік тому +18

    I thought Edward, Sophie, and Andrew’s girls and Anne’s children all had careers and their own “voice”. (Only the Monarch has to be completely neutral.) And I thought I heard that the Queen discussed MM’s desire to continue acting. The problem arose when MM & Harry decided to make a fortune “marketing” Sussex Royals in America.

    • @hedaheda1609
      @hedaheda1609 Рік тому +4

      I don't really understand Meghan's obsession with "the voice". Yes, the monarchy must be politically neutral, it is in all constitutional monarchies, and Meghan, an international relations specialist, should have known that. If you want to be politically active wife - marry a politician of your spectrum, not a royal.
      But also within the framework of neutrality in the RF, she could be active in her own topics - such as climate change, sustainability and the improvement of women's status.
      And I don't believe that her opinion was not listened to in the family, rejected, as long as it was an opinion, not nagging and demands.

    • @amandam480
      @amandam480 Рік тому +2

      Edward and Sophie did have careers but had to leave. Edward did documentaries but got criticism for focusing on the brf. He was forced to leave when crew from his production company filmed at St Andrews University when William was studying there.
      Sophie was in pr and had her own company. She was set up by one of the papers. Cant remember how or why.
      Princess Anne's children and Andrews children are lucky. They get the perks of being royal without the responsibilities

    • @hedaheda1609
      @hedaheda1609 Рік тому +1

      @@amandam480 Were Beatrice and Eugenie not working royals until they got engaged(although not in senior royal status)?

    • @amandam480
      @amandam480 Рік тому

      @@hedaheda1609 I don't think so. Not officially anyway.

    • @lekis5975
      @lekis5975 Місяць тому

      ​@@amandam480 Sophie shot her mouth off to a fake Sheikh in the hopes of securing a lucrative contract and it blew up in her face. She wasn't even qualified to run a PR firm, prior she was a typist/PA turned Events girl. She was clearly trying to capitalize on her royal connections and it blew up in her face.

  • @joanofthemountains
    @joanofthemountains Рік тому +3

    Meghan has to be number 1 or it is a no go. I doubt very much she truly had independence in mind. She learned that she was not going to usurp Kate, and when you are part of royalty you become part of a team. Meghan is definitely not a team player. As said previously, she has to be number 1.

  • @jolynetheoffspring.5530
    @jolynetheoffspring.5530 Рік тому +7

    Fergie had to go through this garbage as well💯💯

  • @joanncapshaw1012
    @joanncapshaw1012 Рік тому +8

    She was a suitcase model and on a cable TV show. She was basically an unknown actress. I had never heard of her before Harry, and I am in the United States. She's a proven liar, narcissistic social climber. She knew a lot more about the Royal Family than she would like the world to know. When Harry is of no further use to her she'll get rid of him in a heartbeat. Then she'll milk the family for money because of the children. That by the way you never see unless it's profitable for her. She's always first and foremost about the almighty dollar.

  • @saviness
    @saviness Рік тому +13

    Thank you for the soap opera Tina.
    I've used up all of my kleenex . Diversity???A white dress and veil for a 36 year-old divorced woman ? Freshness?? Marrying a rich man and never letting go of his hand like a teenager ? A free-spirited woman only wanting to wear designer clothes? Give us a break!!! She wanted to make her own rules. When you go into a firm, you follow the rules and you learn the job. Was she really doing a good job....put on your glasses Tina. We don't have to like or dislike these two. We judge their attitude and behaviour.

  • @Oughut88
    @Oughut88 Рік тому +4

    Big career? She was a cable tv actress 😂

  • @amandam480
    @amandam480 Рік тому +2

    Tina brown mentions that royals are dependent on the monarch and not that rich. However they have alot of previliges. They have access to grace and favour apartments in the Royal palaces and Mansions on the Royal estates.
    Its very hard for a royal to walk away. She is correct with this. As Harry and Meghan are finding out being a royal yiu have a private secretary, pr, security all paid for by the monarch. Plus you don't really have to work that hard either.

  • @LibbyKay-tj3mj
    @LibbyKay-tj3mj Рік тому +17

    Tina Brown is such an astute and witty commentator, as well as a fabulous writer.

  • @angelabaker1992
    @angelabaker1992 Рік тому +13

    This is the most sensible discussion I have heard on all of this.

  • @katebuckfield7736
    @katebuckfield7736 Рік тому +15

    Freedom to be homeless, freedom to be hungry, freedom to be cold in winter….l could go on.

  • @helensieben3182
    @helensieben3182 Рік тому +10

    Meghan went to Britain looking for a rich man, there are plenty of richer men than Harry, that come with no rules. She chose Harry because he came with a title, that would give her name recognition around the world, she now has that,what will she do with it?

  • @SDu-nm7bw
    @SDu-nm7bw Рік тому +11

    The interviewer was not prepared...Her assertion that Meghan was not welcomed by the British people is simply wrong. The Royal Family is also conflated with celebrity; they are obviously famous but they are part of a system of government. If you are speaking out, you are so often criticising govt policy. However, whilst they cannot directly criticise, they can drive change through their charitable endeavours..To be Royal is to be part of a team which is also hierarchical..Meghan didn't wan't, Harry didn't wan't that..They played everyone. Best that they stay in the US.

  • @Silencedogood-r6l
    @Silencedogood-r6l Місяць тому +2

    “No one who looked like Meghan.” What’re you talking about??? Meghan looks *WHITE*

  • @elizaf.9040
    @elizaf.9040 Рік тому +5

    Why complain about not being rich because the royal family won't allow it. Sob, sob. I'm not rich either, like most people. No one forced Markle to marry Haz. Pippa Middleton is doing pretty well outside TRF

  • @janicepargh5155
    @janicepargh5155 Рік тому +2

    King George VI and wife were happy being the spare! Wanted a quiet family life. His father, King George V, was also a spare. Margaret was a self destructive wild child. Edward has settled into his lesser role. Princess Ann and her children have figured it out. The British monarch is an a-political figurehead. No independent voices. Not a life for most because it doesn’t allow for free expression and there are financial limitations.

  • @meghabisht5401
    @meghabisht5401 Рік тому +2

    I have a question: Tina Brown frequently says, "Big Career". I saw Meghan Markle only in one tv show Suits, in which she has a side role. Is there any other successful show of her's?

  • @user-zl9uh7wm9r
    @user-zl9uh7wm9r Рік тому +23

    What big career?

    • @hedaheda1609
      @hedaheda1609 Рік тому +1

      The thing is that she doesn't have a big career anywhere, neither in acting, nor in social activities, anywhere. Everywhere she has touched the surface, but she has not gone deep and thorough in any area.

  • @cherylcampbell5654
    @cherylcampbell5654 Рік тому +2

    I read the book. Great discussion. Thank you.

  • @TenTenJ
    @TenTenJ Рік тому +9

    If we go by genetics, then Charles has at least another 15 to 20 years of rule, that is not short in this day and age.

  • @maryk3458
    @maryk3458 5 місяців тому +1

    tina got this all wrong. Chas was always a forward thinker and very popular

  • @BarbaraEhrlich-y5m
    @BarbaraEhrlich-y5m Рік тому +3

    Tina Brown is a brilliant and astute observer of life. I love her insights.

  • @BarbaraEhrlich-y5m
    @BarbaraEhrlich-y5m Рік тому

    I love and admire Tina Brown. She’s a fascinating woman.

  • @rainbowsky119
    @rainbowsky119 Рік тому +4

    I don’t agree with Alina at all.

  • @judehardman146
    @judehardman146 6 місяців тому +2

    The interviewer is pathetic.

  • @hollyg3372
    @hollyg3372 2 дні тому

    What do you mean Meghan couldn't work? Both the Queen and Prince Charles said Meghywas free to continue her acting career. It was her choice not to do so.

  • @adagietto2523
    @adagietto2523 Рік тому +2

    This is a very old video!!

  • @hazelford830
    @hazelford830 Рік тому +2

    The reason Camilla has been married longer than Diana was because there was three in the marriage of Charles and Camilla . They worked it out together what Birgin would make a good baby machine, Camilla helped there , Poor Diana knew he loved her and the wedding vows were lies, Charles said Whatever love is ! When he was asked if he loved Diana
    , Absolutly disgusting, I hope they said a few prayers for firgivness , People say she was not perfect, Bless her she was broken hearted and ended up with depression, The princes saw there dear mother so upset , little William passing tissues under the bathroom door, No wonder Harry is so angry and mixed up, It’s a awfull coincidence Diana got killed bless her ! 🙏🙏♥️

    • @Susan-fw9zq
      @Susan-fw9zq Місяць тому

      They should never have married shade out she loved country life etc like future husband but changed after marriage she also told Jenny Bond Prince Charles had loved her there were letters he wrote that proved it.

  • @josefinajaime4550
    @josefinajaime4550 3 місяці тому

    Victims narratives

  • @susanjoseph8453
    @susanjoseph8453 Місяць тому

    Why are some people dragging down Harry wife. Tina Brown you must mind your own damn business and stop degrading the other woman daughter like that. I hope that you have children for words against Meghan to return back to you and your children. It is not good the bad mouth other people children.

  • @hazelford830
    @hazelford830 Рік тому

    No this woman don’t like Camilla , Allways the mistress to me, She helped break a marriage , Two little boys saw there mother with a broken heart, On the day of the wedding Charles and Camilla sat in the church knowing there evil secret, and the wedding vows were broken, Poor Diana was just a girl of 19, and vunrable,
    No she’s no queen, Diane was the queen of hearts ! ♥️♥️🙏🙏

    • @Susan-fw9zq
      @Susan-fw9zq Місяць тому

      Diana book like Harry's hrrvtfuths the marriage was doomed she made out she liked country life till she was married. Diana had mental health problems due to her parents djvorce. My mother got battered but protected her children not demanding their allegiance and loyalty. Where do u think Harry gets it from.

    • @Susan-fw9zq
      @Susan-fw9zq Місяць тому

      Queen of Hearts till we realised how difficult to livecwith shecwss we only saw good side. Unfortunately we see all of Harry's sides!

  • @Chicharrera.
    @Chicharrera. Рік тому +5

    The monarchy started with William the Conquerer. It will end with William the Woke.

  • @Katya67
    @Katya67 Рік тому

    HTF was she supposed to eat? Charles told Prince Harry Meghan had immediately legal issues because of the British media. She paid for her own clothing after having to completely change her wardrobe and buy those stupid hats, she paid for Harry to have furniture when @royalfamily had him living in the servant's quarters. She said she wrote to @royalfamily saying she understood not having security for her or Prince Archie. WTF??? Charles had to know she had received death threats. And he pays for Prince Andrew to have security. They pay for Sophie's security detail that killed a woman recently. You aren't being fair. Kate is paid for by Charles as are the Wales' kids. As Meghan said I didn't expect it to be easy but I expected it to be fair.

    • @lilij1915
      @lilij1915 Рік тому +3

      After she was married Charles paid for her massive wardrobe. Do your research.

    • @lilij1915
      @lilij1915 Рік тому +1

      Their security was paid for when they were working royals in the uk . When they left Charles gave them a lump sum to help them. After that they needed to pay for their own life. They had millions from Diana and the Queen. They were NEVER POOR

    • @Katya67
      @Katya67 Рік тому

      @@lilij1915 That seems highly unlikely! What research do you have? Other hate accounts?
      Princess Harry paid for her wedding gown, her parents' clothing and her "royal" wardrobe PRIOR to her marriage. Are you really suggesting that she invoiced Charles? My research indicates a big "NO" !!!!!

    • @lilij1915
      @lilij1915 Рік тому +1

      @@Katya67 Yes, she paid for her clothes PRIOR to her wedding. Afterward the bills for her massive wardrobe went to Charles.
      The wedding was also 34million.The royal family paid over 34 million for her damn wedding!
      So stop whining about how she was deprived. Her lack of appreciation for what she received is astounding

    • @Katya67
      @Katya67 Рік тому

      @@lilij1915 The Royal family paid 30 million pounds for Kate Middleton's wedding. I suppose they paid for her dress too?
      90% of those figures 30 vs. 32 million pounds was for security ... as you should know. It has been proven time and time again. True for Kate and also true for Meghan.
      Where's your proof that Charles paid for Meghan's clothing. Harry says no so who are you to say different. It doesn't show up on the accounting and the Queen's offices said they paid for the decorations lunch etc. Charles' paid for the reception. Meg paid for her clothing and the clothing for the bridesmaids and her parents.

  • @yordanosdebesay1425
    @yordanosdebesay1425 Рік тому

    What about the abuse she receive from media ?? They were spiteful

    • @lilij1915
      @lilij1915 Рік тому

      Now they get terrible press in America. They also get made fun of by comedians and cartoon shows. They are criticized more than ever

  • @diannemartinez5284
    @diannemartinez5284 Рік тому +1

    Proud of harry and meghan for leaving and making their own way and not being servants to others . Great for them for choosing to live a happy life and not be kept and become robotic like the rest of the royal family.

    • @joanncapshaw1012
      @joanncapshaw1012 Рік тому +9

      Making their own money by throwing his whole family and hers under the bus!!! Her loyalty is $$$ and nothing more!

    • @feefiisaifon7131
      @feefiisaifon7131 Рік тому +6

      What are you talking about? H&M have nevet left, they just moved away. They're still hanging on the RF and making money out of he monarchy's name. Happy people do not badmouthing their family for money.

    • @goodowner5000
      @goodowner5000 Рік тому +1

      💯% 🎯

    • @Susan-fw9zq
      @Susan-fw9zq Місяць тому

      Crap, they w 22:11 ant to remain Royal not free critersize everything but want give their titles up. Hypocrites!

    • @Susan-fw9zq
      @Susan-fw9zq Місяць тому +1

      ​@@lilij1915Harry deserves to be miserable hope they have a longcsad bitter life together. Cruel to his dying grandparents Royal or not! What about the po pony's death acceptable in yourselves?