China's biggest aircraft carrier heads to sea for the first time

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 30 кві 2024
  • China's newest aircraft carrier, the Fujian, started sea trials. When might it enter service and how does it compare to the US Ford? Watch to find out. This video is optimized for phone usage.
    Music by Matija Malatestinic www.malatestinic.com
    If you want to watch our videos without ads, if you want quick replies to any questions you might have, if you want early access scripts and videos, monthly release schedules - become our Patron.
    More here: / binkov
    You can also browse for other Binkov merch, like T-Shirts, via the store at our website, binkov.com
    Subscribe to Binkov's channel for more videos! / @binkov
    Follow Binkov's news on Facebook! / binkovsbattlegrounds
    Follow us on Twitter: / commissarbinkov

КОМЕНТАРІ • 1 тис.

  • @dollgoo-jx8fv
    @dollgoo-jx8fv 15 днів тому +72

    Many sour grapes seeing chinese new aircraft carrier starts sailing in the open sea

    • @Mishn0
      @Mishn0 15 днів тому +5

      I'm happy to see them waste tons of money on something that will be of little strategic value to them. They won't dare put their status symbol where it could be threatened. Much like the Russians Su-57s.

    • @user-dr1yh5qs5b
      @user-dr1yh5qs5b 15 днів тому +4

      @@Mishn0 You must have been absent from the China Coast Guard’s free trip to Hawaii 😂

    • @Mishn0
      @Mishn0 15 днів тому +2

      @@user-dr1yh5qs5b The US, unlike the CCP respects the freedom of the seas. We don't have a tantrum and shoot missiles into the water to kill fish if someone passes near our territorial waters.

    • @thewackymonkey920
      @thewackymonkey920 15 днів тому +2

      @@Mishn0 is braindead he needs all these lies to have a better sleep at night let him be everyone

    • @giganigga9624
      @giganigga9624 15 днів тому +1

      @@user-dr1yh5qs5bChina is well aware that we won’t let an invasion of Taiwan slide like that. This is why they are scared to invade. Attacking the main supplier of US semiconductor (Taiwan) would be like declaring war

  • @user-sk9nx2rg6u
    @user-sk9nx2rg6u 3 дні тому +15

    Hahaha! The comments in the comment section are fantastic! This is correct! This is just a fishing boat, don't worry! The construction of aircraft carriers 004 and 005 has started simultaneously, and the construction of two 076 unmanned aerial vehicle carriers equipped with electromagnetic catapults has also begun in Shanghai. It is possible to conduct sea trials from 2024 to 2025. I hope you can convey to the rulers of your country not to worry, they are just fishing boats.❤🎉❤

  • @tmoosy
    @tmoosy 15 днів тому +18

    The new format works well on mobile, I watch mostly on pc though

    • @ibraced1243
      @ibraced1243 15 днів тому +2

      short formats are ruining youtube

    • @PaulJohn01
      @PaulJohn01 15 днів тому

      @@ibraced1243 +1

    • @outman1923
      @outman1923 14 днів тому

      You are outdated... The PC world is about 1 billion people... while the smartphone world is about 7 billion people... Yes, PCs work well, but smartphones work even better.

  • @peterpanini96
    @peterpanini96 13 днів тому +26

    I prefer 16:9 ratio videos... this format youre trying is horendous and only works on tik tok. 😢

  • @liwang3855
    @liwang3855 14 днів тому +31

    大家不要紧张,这只是我们的大型渔船,用于捕捉鲸鱼🐳,只不过设计成了航空母舰的样子而已。爱你们❤️❤️❤️❤️

    • @fzmoifzmoi2575
      @fzmoifzmoi2575 14 днів тому

      😂 Very humorous! 🤣

    • @user-lz8nv8be2t
      @user-lz8nv8be2t 14 днів тому +2

      确实是大型捕鱼船,众所周知平整的甲板只是为了更好的分类和加工鱼类!

    • @violetsha2087
      @violetsha2087 14 днів тому

      我证明是真的,我就住在这个岛上。

    • @user-hi6hl5pz5t
      @user-hi6hl5pz5t 14 днів тому

      大尺寸?体积小!

    • @Cuisaner
      @Cuisaner 14 днів тому

      不能捕鲸的好吧,捕鱼船倒是真的

  • @user-ld4xx1el6q
    @user-ld4xx1el6q 15 днів тому +20

    The narrow screen format sucks!

    • @SFlare-xx7zl
      @SFlare-xx7zl 13 днів тому +1

      Ikr it works for shorts but for a 4+ minutes long video it sucks so bad

  • @jiang-gt1fl
    @jiang-gt1fl 2 дні тому +6

    Our aircraft carrier is just a fishing boat, used for fishing, not fighting. We can't even compare with the Indian aircraft carrier, let alone the United States. Please don't stare at China every day. We were invaded from 1840 to 1965, and we just wanted to live a better life.

  • @swedgephd
    @swedgephd 15 днів тому +7

    type 004 will be interesting, type 003 seems to be a proving ground for building their own designs and carrier ops

    • @testerjs
      @testerjs 15 днів тому

      I don't know they are play all the card the Soviets did before collapsing just watch china they are the sick man of the big economies.

  • @libraeotequever3pointoh95
    @libraeotequever3pointoh95 15 днів тому +9

    Personally, I'm not a fan of the "video shorts" format.
    I prefer television or theater aspect ratios.

  • @NightWiz11
    @NightWiz11 15 днів тому +11

    Guys, at least it's better than Admiral Kusnetsov!

    • @cutedogsgettingcuddles9862
      @cutedogsgettingcuddles9862 15 днів тому +4

      We can tell it's better because it's not on fire. The second half of this decade is going to be "interesting times."

    • @haymaker710
      @haymaker710 15 днів тому +3

      That's not saying much.

  • @looinrims
    @looinrims 15 днів тому +13

    Why is this video vertical mode?

    • @Ryuu1010YT
      @Ryuu1010YT 15 днів тому

      dude it's for phones

    • @looinrims
      @looinrims 15 днів тому

      @@Ryuu1010YT I’m on my phone, jackass, it still looks like shit

  • @rayhall5610
    @rayhall5610 4 дні тому +4

    Agreed, it's literally a fishing ship.

  • @Galileo1491
    @Galileo1491 15 днів тому +6

    They have the capability to feild as many carriers as we do bit They don't. They seem to be doing it in baby steps which is actually pretty smart.

    • @_Chad_ThunderCock
      @_Chad_ThunderCock 15 днів тому

      I think they'll field a lot more once they have a carrier design they are fully confident in

    • @outman1923
      @outman1923 14 днів тому +1

      @@_Chad_ThunderCock In today's world, there are 190 countries, and China is the largest trading partner for 130 of them. This implies that China has a responsibility to possess the most powerful naval fleet on Earth, used to defend China and the majority of countries in the world from attacks by Anglo-Saxon pirate gangs. For example, China is India's largest trading partner. I believe Indians would also not want a situation where tomorrow, the United States suddenly demands that India stop importing goods from China, threatening to bomb India otherwise. If China has the strongest fleet, we can safeguard the trade security of both China and India.

    • @_Chad_ThunderCock
      @_Chad_ThunderCock 14 днів тому

      @@outman1923 I don't question Chinas ability to create the world's powerful fleet. I just think they want to be very methodological, so they can develop a very capable nuclear carrier fleet and that's going to take a bit of time.

  • @kovi567
    @kovi567 15 днів тому +9

    why phone alignment?

  • @alcosound
    @alcosound 15 днів тому +8

    Personally, I prefer these videos in a horizontal format. Thanks for your effort, anyway

  • @yikemoo
    @yikemoo 15 днів тому +5

    I'm just here to see what the bots say when the coverage is mostly positive.

    • @yikemoo
      @yikemoo 12 днів тому

      Shocker, they're still mad about everything else.

  • @lolfang5725
    @lolfang5725 15 днів тому +20

    作为中国人并根据中文互联网的信息做了一点总结:
    1. 辽宁号航母,其前身是苏联产航母,运到中国时被完全去军事化几乎是一艘空壳,工程师花了多年修复它,意义在于研究和验证技术
    2. 山东号航母,由中国制造,辽宁号的复制品,意义在于确认中国有能力从头开始建造航母
    3. 福建号航母,在学习了如何行走和奔跑后,开始研究电磁弹射技术,追赶第一梯队,福建号将成为目前中国海军的主力,和未来中国航母的模板

    • @wisenG771
      @wisenG771 15 днів тому +2

      Speak English boy

    • @testerjs
      @testerjs 15 днів тому

      Quite commie

    • @GoldenBear4321
      @GoldenBear4321 15 днів тому +4

      @@wisenG771or u can just translate

    • @user-cj2wz8sb1l
      @user-cj2wz8sb1l 15 днів тому +1

      As a Chinese and based on the information of the Chinese Internet made a little summary: 1. The aircraft carrier Liaoning, formerly a Soviet-made aircraft carrier, was completely demilitarized and almost an empty shell when it arrived in China, and engineers spent years repairing it, the significance of which is to research and verify the technology 2. The Shandong, a Chinese-made replica of the Liaoning, is significant in confirming China's ability to build aircraft carriers from scratch 3. The Fujian aircraft carrier, after learning how to walk and run, began to study electromagnetic catapult technology to catch up with the first echelon, and the Fujian will become the main force of the current Chinese Navy and the template for the future Chinese aircraft carrier

    • @hanrockabrand95
      @hanrockabrand95 15 днів тому +1

      Read up on how the Liaoning was really purchased. Fascinating story.

  • @jarink1
    @jarink1 14 днів тому +6

    Length of the video is fine, but I don't like videos presented in a vertical format. I watch YT primarily on a PC and TV. When I do occasionally watch on a phone, I always turn it sideways to give more clarity of details on the screen.

  • @jackhiggins9926
    @jackhiggins9926 15 днів тому +7

    I prefer landscape videos but if portrait is more popular with the algorithm then you should keep using it. Keep up the good work commander!

  • @TheNinjaMarmot
    @TheNinjaMarmot 15 днів тому +5

    It's a good time to be alive seeing more military innovation and competitiveness.
    I'll be more worried if China starts building arks.

    • @yikemoo
      @yikemoo 14 днів тому

      Its a good time to be alive when major world powers are starting to engage in an arms race in anticipation of a huge war?

  • @snapper69996666
    @snapper69996666 15 днів тому +18

    Good work China, probably cost a fraction of the price compared to the US made ones.

    • @TheOriginalDeckBoy
      @TheOriginalDeckBoy 15 днів тому

      Bahahahahaaaa yeah... good work

    • @shuathe2nd
      @shuathe2nd 15 днів тому +3

      Well it should cost a lot less as it's not nuclear - the UK went own the same route, but it does limit how far it can go and how long it can remain on station when it gets there. I would imagine the use case for this ship is staying within the south China sea so it should be fine, but it wouldn't be able sail to the Mediterranean and run a year long operation against an adversary - unlike the US carriers which can and do do that.

    • @tetraxis3011
      @tetraxis3011 15 днів тому +2

      Wonders of non nuclear and cheap labor force.

    • @testerjs
      @testerjs 15 днів тому

      The question is. Will it be in operational before the Kennedy?

  • @whatiswhat4
    @whatiswhat4 15 днів тому +12

    Love the video, DON'T love the narrow vertical video format.

    • @andrewlim7751
      @andrewlim7751 15 днів тому

      The Chinese don't have a tradition of videoing their new toy for the world, quite likely it's done by some amateur.

  • @optimusprime4750
    @optimusprime4750 5 днів тому +6

    004将会是003同型姐妹舰 仍然是燃油动力 会改进一些003使用经验发现的问题 005开始才会尝试运用原子动力 是否会将吨位加到十万吨也是未知数 未来十年之内基本上很难看到美国与法国之外的原子动力航母 但如果俄国愿意出售反应堆技术 那么时间表可能会提前 俄国的北风之神原子动力潜艇技术仍然高于美国 如果096潜艇能够获得相关技术 会大幅增加先进性能

    • @user-pw6mf2pn1v
      @user-pw6mf2pn1v 23 години тому

      如果按照山东下水到福建下水的速度,十年内核动力会下水。

  • @phylismaddox4880
    @phylismaddox4880 15 днів тому +1

    The new style is not to my taste but I'm just here for the content. You guys do what you need to - I'll be here.
    Thankfully listening only is always an option !

  • @AlexLee-dc2vb
    @AlexLee-dc2vb 15 днів тому +6

    I love the idea of the Newsflash series but PLEASE do not have them filmed vertically, come on

  • @burprobrox9134
    @burprobrox9134 15 днів тому +14

    I hope you realize that many of us watch on tablets computers and televisions. The vertical format sucks

    • @AmirShafeek
      @AmirShafeek 15 днів тому +3

      Watching on a tablet now and a I hate it

  • @Splattle101
    @Splattle101 15 днів тому +5

    Don't care one way or the other about the format. Just keep bringing the info.

  • @rokadaprliinnysystemyaczno4761
    @rokadaprliinnysystemyaczno4761 15 днів тому +6

    Short few minutes format, good, but vertical video....bad

    • @Ryuu1010YT
      @Ryuu1010YT 15 днів тому

      it's only for phones.

  • @ArnsteinTrany
    @ArnsteinTrany 15 днів тому +5

    I watch on a pc, so very much prefer the regular format.

  • @erasmus_locke
    @erasmus_locke 15 днів тому +7

    I assumed that it was nuclear. Conventional diesel seems like a massive liability if their plan is to project power around the world.

    • @Mishn0
      @Mishn0 15 днів тому +5

      She's not diesel. Conventional oil-fired boilers for steam turbines.

    • @kc2213
      @kc2213 15 днів тому +1

      They're not trying to project power around the world like the US does.

    • @LordBuckhouse
      @LordBuckhouse 15 днів тому +5

      The CCP has not been able to steal a suitable reactor design as of yet. But the monkey see/monkey do country is hard at work trying to steal one.

    • @yixinmei5854
      @yixinmei5854 15 днів тому

      Chinese CV's major missions are building shields between amphibious vessel fleet and potential American attack.

    • @MrYeahbuddah
      @MrYeahbuddah 15 днів тому +3

      If the they plan to invade Taiwan they don’t need nuclear carriers West Taiwan is next to Taiwan

  • @Wolfhound223
    @Wolfhound223 15 днів тому +1

    Thx Comrade Binkov!

  • @yutian5884
    @yutian5884 15 днів тому +21

    If your country's navy doesn't even operate a carrier group then I don't want to hear it from you in the comments.

    • @vdotme
      @vdotme 15 днів тому

      You think your country operating a carrier makes you an expert or authority on the subject? 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣

    • @yutian5884
      @yutian5884 15 днів тому +6

      @@vdotme Only critiques from USA are accepted. Chinese are not interested in downward comparison, only upward. ☝

    • @shanhuang7964
      @shanhuang7964 15 днів тому

      ​@@vdotme weird flex but ok

    • @vdotme
      @vdotme 15 днів тому

      @@yutian5884 so, a dictator and an expert. Your mother must be so proud. 🤣🤣🤣🤣

    • @Qiushishuo
      @Qiushishuo 15 днів тому +2

      @@vdotme You mean Junior Marcos and his Father in corruption?

  • @zhoma982
    @zhoma982 6 днів тому +15

    福建号的动力是烧秸秆,所以中国政府禁止农民烧秸秆了,福建号山东号辽宁号都是烧秸秆来的。

  • @maestromecanico597
    @maestromecanico597 15 днів тому +3

    It’s always good to try new things to stay fresh. But I watch UA-cam on a large screen monitor. I’m not about to unmount it and flip it on its side.

    • @Ryuu1010YT
      @Ryuu1010YT 15 днів тому +1

      it's only for phones

    • @maestromecanico597
      @maestromecanico597 15 днів тому +1

      @@Ryuu1010YT Agreed and ironic; I’ve never watched Commissar Binkov’s work on my phone.

    • @Ryuu1010YT
      @Ryuu1010YT 15 днів тому +1

      @@maestromecanico597 it's getting end up into brainrot you know gen alphas

  • @albertwesker3165
    @albertwesker3165 15 днів тому +1

    Dose anyone noticed there are lots of wheel tracks around the catapults? All the three catapults are full covered by those tracks, they should have already launched many times.

  • @allgood6760
    @allgood6760 15 днів тому +1

    Thanks for this 👍

  • @marshalllapenta7656
    @marshalllapenta7656 15 днів тому +4

    Question?
    Technically isn't 1 of those carriers an old Ukrainian or USSR air craft carrier?
    Does China have any Nuclear powered air craft carriers?
    How many people does this take to be operational? 20,000?
    How many aircraft can it contain?
    Doesn't China only have 1 base or port in the world?

    • @hanrockabrand95
      @hanrockabrand95 15 днів тому +2

      I can answer some. The Liaoning was originally the Riga, built in Ukraine for the Soviet navy. The Shandong was built domestically as a modified version of Riga's design. The Fujian is a new design for China. None of them are nuclear-powered, which could mean the EMALS system would have a slower launch rate (fewer aircraft per minute) than if it were powered by a nuclear reactor.

    • @RayW808
      @RayW808 15 днів тому +1

      Good question about away Ports, if not they'd be tethered to the Mainland.

    • @marshalllapenta7656
      @marshalllapenta7656 15 днів тому +1

      @@hanrockabrand95 Wouldn't the conventional powered carriers leave a smoke signal behind?

    • @hanrockabrand95
      @hanrockabrand95 15 днів тому +2

      @@marshalllapenta7656 Depends on the design. Old Soviet designs do.

    • @hanrockabrand95
      @hanrockabrand95 15 днів тому

      For ports, China is expanding its influence abroad and currently looking to develop ports/facilities in Pakistan, Sri Lanka, Bangladesh, Myanmar, and Djibouti that could be adapted for use in resupplying their navy.

  • @harkonnn1964
    @harkonnn1964 15 днів тому +7

    I dont like the format, eventhough i watch on mobile

  • @tomlom69
    @tomlom69 15 днів тому

    I love listening to a sock puppet for some of the most cutting edge info you can get, at least on UA-cam.

  • @jj-eg5up
    @jj-eg5up 15 днів тому +1

    Thanks for the video

  • @UnitedUA
    @UnitedUA 15 днів тому +5

    China can make and operate carriers while Russia can't! 😂

    • @Mercer1012
      @Mercer1012 15 днів тому +1

      Russia can, it's just not a priority. For Russia, submarines are a much better use of money due to their much more varied defense requirements.

    • @testerjs
      @testerjs 15 днів тому +2

      Well it helps to be second biggest economy in the world and not be ashamed that your success is based on you being a developing country. If China has 3 aircraft carriers and a space program I say they are a developed country and they should have to play with the big boys.

  • @RLVIDEOS2024
    @RLVIDEOS2024 15 днів тому +12

    *congratulations to the Chinese navy*

  • @RitzCracker2500
    @RitzCracker2500 15 днів тому +2

    I liked the new format

  • @captainsigismund6449
    @captainsigismund6449 15 днів тому

    The new format isn't bad, just needs some work. It won't be appropriate for all topics. When you show maps and info graphs I prefer the full screen layout. Never stop experimenting.

  • @harrypothead4575
    @harrypothead4575 14 днів тому +3

    What about type 004? Didn't south China morning post reported that its construction started back in late 2021? No idea whether that article is reliable or not.

    • @yikemoo
      @yikemoo 13 днів тому

      Wow, someone who's asking a real question. SCMP is a mixed bag, there is reason to believe they're relatively independent and also that they're falling more and more under the control of the CCP. But its not a tabloid, its solid in the sense they're not likely to be reporting things that are just flat-out false. Whether or not someone told them what to say (or what not to say). I'm not sure about the exact article you're referencing but I believe the latest info coming from western open-source stuff is they have 2 carriers under construction.

    • @yikemoo
      @yikemoo 13 днів тому

      This really isn't the best wiki page, closer to one of the worst, but its a start, and if you're spending 5 min to read they're articles, its worth 5 min to read who they are.
      en.wikipedia.org/wiki/South_China_Morning_Post#:~:text=The%20SCMP%20prints%20paper%20editions,is%20blocked%20in%20mainland%20China.

    • @user-vn6je8zw9l
      @user-vn6je8zw9l 7 днів тому

      Do you think the keel of an aircraft carrier was transformed in one day? When you see the keel frame design, it has been under construction for more than 2 years.

  • @user-yw8zm9wn7l
    @user-yw8zm9wn7l 13 днів тому +8

    福建舰只是用来过渡的,中国大概还要制造一艘常规动力航母,然后再继续制造核动力航母😂

  • @NicoGrosso78
    @NicoGrosso78 15 днів тому +1

    why does the j35's cockpit open like the f35 if it doesn't have the vtol fan...

    • @user-qu5rr1cp3k
      @user-qu5rr1cp3k 15 днів тому +2

      有好的答案你不抄表示你很傻,错的答案你还抄也表示你很傻。但中国人显然不傻。

  • @sorenkasten1071
    @sorenkasten1071 15 днів тому +1

    The Format cuts out part of text

  • @eldarshamukhamedov4521
    @eldarshamukhamedov4521 15 днів тому +10

    What the hell is up with this vertical layout???

  • @amunra5330
    @amunra5330 15 днів тому +15

    Congratz China.

  • @JayT9626
    @JayT9626 15 днів тому

    binkov upload on the wrong category?

  • @tetraxis3011
    @tetraxis3011 15 днів тому

    Nicely done. I wonder if the smol carrier borne AWACS they were developing is finished. Also don’t they need to add a catapult hook for all the J15s this is going to operate?

    • @andrean2247
      @andrean2247 15 днів тому

      J15B work with catapult. KJ600 carrier borne awacs are ongoing test with J35

    • @tetraxis3011
      @tetraxis3011 15 днів тому

      @@andrean2247 Oh ok. Didn’t know that the J15 B was already catapult ready.

    • @andrean2247
      @andrean2247 15 днів тому

      @@tetraxis3011 yep it was catapult ready.

    • @tetraxis3011
      @tetraxis3011 15 днів тому

      @@andrean2247 Makes sense. Having the combat air wing ready so that as soon as the carrier enters service the fighters can be deployed.

  • @nomercynodragonforyou9688
    @nomercynodragonforyou9688 15 днів тому +4

    This format is kidna weird

  • @tonyv596
    @tonyv596 15 днів тому +11

    If the Chinese want peace they need 7 super carriers for protection from outside forces.

    • @vdotme
      @vdotme 15 днів тому

      2 & a couple of overseas bases will do the trick added to the islands built.

    • @andrean2247
      @andrean2247 15 днів тому

      ​@@vdotmewell may venezuela & cuba can host one.

    • @vdotme
      @vdotme 15 днів тому

      @@andrean2247 more than Venezuela, They'll probably go for the horn of Africa, closer to the action.

    • @andrean2247
      @andrean2247 15 днів тому

      @@vdotme bet, if they can enter republic of congo its done.

    • @outman1923
      @outman1923 14 днів тому

      In today's world, there are 190 countries, and China is the largest trading partner for 130 of them. This implies that China has a responsibility to possess the most powerful naval fleet on Earth, used to defend China and the majority of countries in the world from attacks by Anglo-Saxon pirate gangs. For example, China is India's largest trading partner. I believe Indians would also not want a situation where tomorrow, the United States suddenly demands that India stop importing goods from China, threatening to bomb India otherwise. If China has the strongest fleet, we can safeguard the trade security of both China and India.

  • @43094
    @43094 14 днів тому +1

    As far as stuff goes, yours is always awesome

  • @ioanbota9397
    @ioanbota9397 15 днів тому +2

    They are so powerful I like it

    • @12b_engineer
      @12b_engineer 15 днів тому

      It's literally got a steam turbine engine. It's using an outdated catapult system and still has yet to do any real display of capability besides not falling apart instantly, which with the way their belt and road work goes is an accomplishment itself.

  • @Rayrard
    @Rayrard 14 днів тому +3

    I wonder how many years until the war happens. Not like this thing is very dangerous, but still it is unlikely carriers will be involved in a Taiwan invasion and it will be land based planes. The ex-Russian carriers with the bent decks are no more than amphibious support ships nowadays

    • @MGZetta
      @MGZetta 14 днів тому +5

      China isn't in a rush. War will not happen in this decade unless Taiwan try to declare independence.

    • @fzmoifzmoi2575
      @fzmoifzmoi2575 14 днів тому +2

      Aircraft carriers are pretty much obsolete due to hypersonic missiles. I'm sure China has a use for them tho. Such as for large-scale rescue missions due to catastrophic natural disasters and maybe some aspects of defence.

    • @douglasnakamura6753
      @douglasnakamura6753 14 днів тому

      @@fzmoifzmoi2575 Hypersonics are only good for fixed targets lol, they can't hit moving ships.

    • @Zeptus1488
      @Zeptus1488 14 днів тому +3

      Pray for it to never happen, although it does feel like it's getting closer and closer...

    • @kaiser3626
      @kaiser3626 14 днів тому +1

      Aircraft carriers are still missiles platforms, although its their planes who carries the missiles and extend their range.
      So no, they are still not obsolete, because your ground missiles cant reach everywhere.

  • @testerjs
    @testerjs 15 днів тому +3

    How funny would it be if it's sinks on trails, or if it has to be towed home?

    • @vlhc4642
      @vlhc4642 15 днів тому +12

      The Royal Navy is the exception, not the rule you know.

    • @user-iq8pe2is6n
      @user-iq8pe2is6n 15 днів тому +11

      You must be talking about the mind-blowing embarrassment by HMS Queen Elizabeth and HMS Prince of Wales, or USS Zumwalt...

    • @Mercer1012
      @Mercer1012 15 днів тому

      Nice wishful thinking, doubt that will happen.

    • @maestromecanico597
      @maestromecanico597 15 днів тому

      Why? The Russian navy has been doing that for decades.

    • @Mercer1012
      @Mercer1012 15 днів тому +1

      @@user-iq8pe2is6n Dude, I was agreeing with you and attacking the original commenter...

  • @uditnautiyal2356
    @uditnautiyal2356 15 днів тому +1

    Bring back old style immediately 😢😢😢😢😢

  • @panzhou2803
    @panzhou2803 8 днів тому +1

    这个航母的电磁弹射是怎么达成的,里面难道有个超大锂电池?或者超级电容。。

  • @jamesharper7661
    @jamesharper7661 15 днів тому +4

    Fujian? What a nice name for a coral reef..........

    • @user-cj2wz8sb1l
      @user-cj2wz8sb1l 15 днів тому

      hahaha

    • @alhkcblack9617
      @alhkcblack9617 15 днів тому

      It is also a nice name for your b-hole when a black cork attacks it under the sheets every night.

  • @gvozdencekicevic1322
    @gvozdencekicevic1322 14 днів тому +3

    I appreciate the unbiast content You produce.

  • @u2ber888
    @u2ber888 14 днів тому +3

    Ready to the on PH's ferry boat?😂don't play with fire....

  • @gelinrefira
    @gelinrefira 7 днів тому +3

    As expect, lots of REEEE in the comment section.

  • @user-yw8zm9wn7l
    @user-yw8zm9wn7l 13 днів тому +12

    中国的目标是制造至少5艘常规动力航母,常规动力航母虽然搭载舰载机的数量不如核动力航母但是常规动力航母出勤率比核动力航母更高,所以中国不会急着追求核动力航母,而是会继续制造至少一艘常规动力航母然后再制造核动力航母

    • @marcbuisson2463
      @marcbuisson2463 12 днів тому +1

      Power projection is also not particularly in China's strategic concerns currently, it's much more control over the chinese sea?
      For protection of world trade, the goals and interests are fairly similar with the West and it's that many costs avoided, right?

    • @user-yw8zm9wn7l
      @user-yw8zm9wn7l 12 днів тому +1

      ​@@marcbuisson2463中国海的控制早就完成了,目前中国已经在南海三大方向填充岛礁建立军事基地,只要部署3代机随时可以战时控制南海,中国不会去追求像美国一样在世界部署大量军事基地,那样会导致在海外的军事基地慢慢变得越来越腐败,中国未来可能只会追求在一些东南亚国家开发军港,在一些南亚国家如巴基斯坦马尔代夫部署一些军港,还有在一些非洲国家部署军港,但是这些军港的功能就跟军事基地差不多

    • @zhaoxiaokai
      @zhaoxiaokai 9 днів тому

      三代机控制南海太落伍了,起码得是4代机才可以空优,起码得是歼20级别的。​@@user-yw8zm9wn7l

  • @blolee-gc1sr
    @blolee-gc1sr 11 днів тому +27

    作为一名中国海军工程师并光荣的参与了这艘航母的建造我负责的告诉大家:它是烧煤的

    • @user-kc1dv7wv6g
      @user-kc1dv7wv6g 9 днів тому +3

      不要吹嘘中国的制造能力!😅😅他是烧木炭的

    • @panzhou2803
      @panzhou2803 8 днів тому

      能烧炭作为动力,不是另一种形式的技术领先吗,哈哈哈哈

    • @user-ee9zn3do7r
      @user-ee9zn3do7r 7 днів тому

      钩太直没法钓鱼

    • @user-xd5dm5iq8n
      @user-xd5dm5iq8n 3 дні тому

      我昨天还捡柴火呢。你今天就烧煤了?!

  • @Superpooper-2020
    @Superpooper-2020 14 днів тому +16

    China built supercarrier, turkey built 5th gen stealth jet, meanwhile my india cant even build en0ugh T0ilets f0r us inddians

    • @Dangermonkey1000
      @Dangermonkey1000 14 днів тому

      You love latrine 😂

    • @tamjaicrusader9992
      @tamjaicrusader9992 14 днів тому

      After China, US, Russia f_ck with each other, India will have so many toilets, more than you can count

    • @kubanskiloewe
      @kubanskiloewe 14 днів тому

      india does have much to many people ...🤣

    • @DigitallyNomad3949
      @DigitallyNomad3949 14 днів тому +2

      Indians have a very strong odor. It is so sad. A friend of mine cries whenever she realizes that people start smelling her at work then she would go to the rest room sit there and cry.

    • @jiewang-bl5iu
      @jiewang-bl5iu 14 днів тому

      印度不是世界第一吗?

  • @hyhhy
    @hyhhy 5 днів тому +2

    2-3 years likely until operational capability.

  • @martinilopez1
    @martinilopez1 15 днів тому +6

    shitty aspect ratio!!!! make it 16:9!!!!

    • @asiberiantiger188
      @asiberiantiger188 15 днів тому +1

      Use more exclamation marks

    • @martinilopez1
      @martinilopez1 15 днів тому

      @asiberiantiger188 yeah I really should have to emphasize!!!!!!!!!!!!

  • @seanbumstead1250
    @seanbumstead1250 15 днів тому +10

    Beautiful ship

  • @team3am149
    @team3am149 15 днів тому +1

    It’ll be commissioned no later than 2026.

  • @ajstephen3977
    @ajstephen3977 14 днів тому

    Good balance for a short news brief style video. The vertical format does not work for me though. Note I never watch shorts.

  • @rcs9795
    @rcs9795 15 днів тому +10

    That’s going to make a wonderful artificial reef.

    • @J_X999
      @J_X999 15 днів тому +5

      you are so insecure you had to comment that twice on each video

    • @rcs9795
      @rcs9795 15 днів тому +1

      @@J_X999 stalker.

    • @andrean2247
      @andrean2247 15 днів тому +3

      Uuhh the cope is fantastic

  • @truthful3777
    @truthful3777 15 днів тому +13

    China have been into MagLev technology for many years now. The EM catapult as PLA called it, is a derivative of MagLev. Instead of pulling coach, it just need to pull jets to a speed required for take off.
    Unlike USA that don't have the experience... Further DC EM catapult is better to manipulate the Votage and Current to give a gentle and control acceleration tp redice pilot stress and stress to the airframes.

    • @daveboy2000
      @daveboy2000 15 днів тому +4

      Assuming it works. EM Catapults aren't as reliable as steam catapults and that's very much the reason why the US hasn't made the jump so far, despite testing it.

    • @truthful3777
      @truthful3777 15 днів тому +2

      @@daveboy2000 Are you an engineer?? Do you know how the steam zipper works? .. There is a lot of maintainance issue. EM. Catapult like MagLev no contact on the tracks.. Gliding above tracks using magnetic field. No WEAR and TEAR. How ia steam better thsn EM catapult?? Is your Stream Trains better than MagLev train?? Which run faster?

    • @kylemaolinson9417
      @kylemaolinson9417 15 днів тому +5

      @@truthful3777 He is american, or america simp. So, anything used in America is superior.

    • @truthful3777
      @truthful3777 15 днів тому

      @@daveboy2000 Dont think highly of USA... They are degrading technologically.. There are no bew product nor new innovations coming out from USA nowadys. Back to EM, why USA not successful. They DONT have the Know How??? Even today USA have not fielded a hypersonic missile while China already fielded in PLA army 8 years ago.

    • @truthful3777
      @truthful3777 15 днів тому

      @@daveboy2000 Why US failed in EMALz?? USA don't have the know how.. USA is no longer leader im innovation and new technology breakthrough. All these are accomplish by China. That is a fact. Hypersonic race US also lose to China.

  • @JesusChristItsJasonFrog
    @JesusChristItsJasonFrog 15 днів тому +8

    I bet there is a US submarine lurking around 👀

    • @alhkcblack9617
      @alhkcblack9617 15 днів тому +9

      That's what the black American soldier said to you under the sheets last night

    • @JesusChristItsJasonFrog
      @JesusChristItsJasonFrog 15 днів тому +3

      @@alhkcblack9617 cry more communist ! He’ll wisper to you mama ears soon 🤡

    • @JesusChristItsJasonFrog
      @JesusChristItsJasonFrog 15 днів тому +6

      @@alhkcblack9617 don’t confuse me with your mom 😁

    • @TelpPov
      @TelpPov 15 днів тому +1

      @@JesusChristItsJasonFrogChina is more capitalistic than the west hence you can’t compete

    • @alhkcblack9617
      @alhkcblack9617 15 днів тому +6

      @@JesusChristItsJasonFrog and you don't confuse it for your dad 😂

  • @edisonone
    @edisonone 15 днів тому +3

    .
    My call on what’s going on:
    This boat, type 003, CV-18, is nothing…
    Speculations abound, words in the street is that they have plans for *a super container ship and other marine vessels using thorium reactor* as the
    power source.
    This in turn leads me to believe that once this technology is matured enough (under going actual tests on smaller sized communities right now in the country) that they will refit all four carriers, the 001, 002, 003 (and an additional 003 now in progress) with this power source which is why they still build them using conventional power sources.
    Not only that, but, as we speak, chatters www abound, two 004 class nuclear power CV’s have already started, simoutanously, in two distinct yards as plans are being drawn up for an addition ten boats of different tonnages all likely to br powered by thorium now by 2045 timeframe…
    And, by that logic, we can assume that they will start fielding their Aegis and other naval systems with the same power source due to the safety aspect of thorium reactors over others power sources.
    Only logical you know. They are waiting for thorium.
    .

    • @yikemoo
      @yikemoo 15 днів тому +2

      ok dude, sure

    • @bryf2787
      @bryf2787 15 днів тому +1

      they wouldn't bother, too much work to replace the power system. Easier to build more carriers.

    • @yikemoo
      @yikemoo 14 днів тому

      @@bryf2787 the majority of these idiotic propaganda attempts feel like they're written by a 13 year old. a thorium reactor swap?

    • @bryf2787
      @bryf2787 14 днів тому

      @@yikemoo not propaganda, they just don't know enough so it sounds like propaganda.

  • @HowToMakeSense_
    @HowToMakeSense_ 15 днів тому +3

    It must have been great to see people in the comments crying on Battlefield

  • @user-id3bg3kc3l
    @user-id3bg3kc3l 10 днів тому +5

    EMALS on a conventional propulsion ?? unless they develop or conquer ports around the world, they won´t be able to go very far without a large fleet of supply ships...

    • @kendopa9604
      @kendopa9604 10 днів тому

      They will building very large supply ships😅

    • @lenthokchom
      @lenthokchom 9 днів тому +10

      You clearly have no idea about fujian like most people. China have skipped a whole generation of carrier. They wouldnt invest 13 billion on a carrier that doesnt work.
      Fujian is indeed more capable than the ford in performing the emals. It is more energy efficient.

    • @sasa-tg4od
      @sasa-tg4od 8 днів тому +1

      004 and 005 have been put into production, and China will have 5 aircraft carriers in 2030

    • @werolo3520
      @werolo3520 8 днів тому +3

      If you have passed your middle school physic exams, you should know there is no problem of a conventional carrier with EMALS. The only thing matter is energy efficiency. Actually EMALS has better efficiency than steam catapuls, like those in Kitty Hawk class carrier. In a steam catapuls carrier, you need to consume energy to heat water and than use the energy of steam power to accelerate aircraft. Most of the energy were lost during this process. EMALS use eletric power to accelerate aircraft, energy lost during the process is much fewer than stem catapuls. Steam catapuls work well in US convential carrier. So EMALS will work even better. In other words, EMALS consume less energy than steam catapuls per launch. And because the EMALS in Fujian are using DC. So in theory they have even better efficiency than AC EMALS which were installed in US carrier Ford.

    • @kanding3369
      @kanding3369 8 днів тому +1

      Its not aimed to deploy worldwide

  • @tomsunuwar6940
    @tomsunuwar6940 14 днів тому +13

    Great China 🇨🇳 🇨🇳👍👍💐💐

    • @user-lu3sx9nx6c
      @user-lu3sx9nx6c 14 днів тому

      山寨貨😂😂

    • @michaelthompson9548
      @michaelthompson9548 14 днів тому +1

      Counterfeit master. Master thieves..

    • @iveyzhou8832
      @iveyzhou8832 14 днів тому +2

      @@user-lu3sx9nx6c 你赖皇的无人机用的都是大陆零件,连熊3都是运到青岛去维修的,别笑死人了。

    • @carty200
      @carty200 14 днів тому +1

      Copy cats, can’t build any good technology without stealing 💀💀

    • @williamho1976
      @williamho1976 3 дні тому +1

      @@carty200 Exactly. This latest carrier is a tofu dreg copy of the mighty Nimitz class carrier, but run with substandard old-fashioned tech by the Chinese. The US will wipe them out easily.

  • @MalcomSmittie
    @MalcomSmittie 14 днів тому +6

    As fast as china build ships, they will probally build 10 carriers before the U.S. build 10 Ford carriers...

    • @yikemoo
      @yikemoo 13 днів тому +1

      Where are you getting your info from? China is likely to produce 10 carriers before the U.S. even buys the long-lead items for the next Ford class scheduled. I thought you guys were all "yeah but carriers are useless because of anti-ship missiles"

    • @ZZQ95
      @ZZQ95 8 днів тому +1

      @@yikemoo The shipbuilding speed in China is more than 200 times that of the United States, according to this year's news. If a war were to break out, theoretically, China could build over 200 aircraft carriers in the time it takes the United States to construct one. Times have changed.

    • @yikemoo
      @yikemoo 8 днів тому +1

      @@ZZQ95 you sound like a 13 year old

    • @conanchoong
      @conanchoong 8 днів тому +1

      ​@@yikemoo hes not exagerating. China has 232 times the US shipbuilding capacity and accounts for more than 50% of the whole worlds shipbuilding capability.

    • @gelinrefira
      @gelinrefira 7 днів тому +1

      I don't think they need or want 10 carriers. They just need enough to defend move out to 2nd island chain and to defend their lines of communications. Each carrier is exorbitant to build and maintain even for China and it is a waste of money that can be used to build uplift more people out of poverty and to invest in productive things.

  • @user-wt4bc2jn7k
    @user-wt4bc2jn7k 8 днів тому +24

    我是建造这艘破船的工程师之一,这艘船很差,甚至比不上印度的航母,冒黑烟是因为主要动力是烧煤炭。

    • @user-ee9zn3do7r
      @user-ee9zn3do7r 7 днів тому +8

      这钩太直了吧🤣

    • @WernerZeitRaum
      @WernerZeitRaum 7 днів тому +6

      战忽局业务水平需要提高

    • @gadgetgasspoll2923
      @gadgetgasspoll2923 5 днів тому +2

      Hello Taiwan province

    • @optimusprime4750
      @optimusprime4750 5 днів тому +4

      同意,中国纸老虎不堪一击,印度才是亚洲真正的超级大国

    • @WernerZeitRaum
      @WernerZeitRaum 5 днів тому +3

      @@gadgetgasspoll2923 🤫 这是个渔夫,不要打扰

  • @jR060t
    @jR060t 15 днів тому +11

    I think people who mock Chinese military hardware miss the point.

    • @leminion3097
      @leminion3097 15 днів тому +4

      Those who mock, cant do anything

    • @alexalbrecht5768
      @alexalbrecht5768 15 днів тому +2

      @@leminion3097 except you know, build the worlds largest and most capable carrier fleet and equip them with the best carrier aircraft the world has to offer. China will still be relying on the less than ideal J-15 for the foreseeable future.

    • @kevinadrian6173
      @kevinadrian6173 14 днів тому

      @@alexalbrecht5768Do you konw the J35 like F35

    • @alexalbrecht5768
      @alexalbrecht5768 14 днів тому

      @@kevinadrian6173 that cheap Chinese knockoff isn’t in service yet bud. The J-15 is all China has.

    • @kevinadrian6173
      @kevinadrian6173 14 днів тому

      ⁠​⁠@@alexalbrecht5768 I don't think it's difficult for u to open the message of J35 by yourself. In fact, it has been tested on the ship for a long time, and it may have a stronger ability than the F35. Call this potential war weapon a cheap imitation, and put away ur arrogance and pay attention to this enemy.😂

  • @bobteo813
    @bobteo813 14 днів тому

    I've work in a 990,000 gross tonage...🤣🤣🤣 SOLITAIRE MPLV.

  • @jessepacheco6020
    @jessepacheco6020 15 днів тому +1

    Love this format!

  • @StalinTheMan0fSteel
    @StalinTheMan0fSteel 15 днів тому +8

    It will end up a giant rust bucket sitting in port somewhere.

    • @andrean2247
      @andrean2247 15 днів тому +7

      Ohh the cope

    • @tainechen1634
      @tainechen1634 15 днів тому

      So does every single ship.

    • @StalinTheMan0fSteel
      @StalinTheMan0fSteel 15 днів тому

      @@tainechen1634 That "prop" masquerading as an Aircraft carrier will go sooner than later.

    • @only_fair23
      @only_fair23 15 днів тому

      ​@@andrean2247It's called mald, I think

    • @Mercer1012
      @Mercer1012 15 днів тому

      @@StalinTheMan0fSteel So much salt....so much cope.

  • @Splattle101
    @Splattle101 15 днів тому +24

    So much American cope in the comments on any vid about this carrier. Quit thinking with your little head for a second and consider what it is and what it's for. China's not the US: China is a continental power, with big land borders and a fundamental interest in the new silk road (the belt and road). Think about where China's interests are and where and how they might deploy this kind of asset. Dollars to cents it's not the kernel of a blue water navy to challenge the USN in the mid Pacific.

    • @mikestewart4752
      @mikestewart4752 15 днів тому +4

      We’ll see the Chinese “coping” when it sinks. 🤣😂🤦

    • @kurtwicklund8901
      @kurtwicklund8901 15 днів тому

      Correct China is a continental power in history is littered with the ruins of Continental Powers who over invested trying to build a blue water Navy to have things both ways. Turns out you pretty much have to pick one of the other as a country. Got little Powers who build babies generally bankrupt themselves

    • @Mishn0
      @Mishn0 15 днів тому +6

      Building a carrier is one thing, that's just hardware and can be copied from other people. Learning how to use one is another thing altogether. The US has a 100 year head start there.

    • @mikestewart4752
      @mikestewart4752 15 днів тому +3

      @@Mishn0 I 100% agree with you. There is no substitute for experience. I feel bad for the PLAN sailors who have been told they have a chance in hell.

    • @elc6895
      @elc6895 15 днів тому

      ​​@@Mishn0so you would advise chna not to build the carrier bcoz U5 with almost full 100 yrs of war experience is no threat to chna. Also the country with d most powerful destructive institution like C1A will not be used against chna? No?
      Why not live in peace, world is big enough for all and let's take good care of our planet earth.

  • @IDBTitanosaurus
    @IDBTitanosaurus 15 днів тому +7

    To the People Republic of China:
    -May Allah reward you for your intentions.

    • @celestialatheist
      @celestialatheist 15 днів тому +4

      mean while islam is consider to be a mental illness in china

    • @user-rm1zi2sm1d
      @user-rm1zi2sm1d 15 днів тому

      @@celestialatheist我怎么不知道

    • @user-cr9yu1dc9y
      @user-cr9yu1dc9y 15 днів тому

      @@celestialatheist Hard to see one being so smart like you nowadays, I cannot imagine what expression does your mother have when she gave birth to you.

  • @zaynevanday142
    @zaynevanday142 15 днів тому +1

    You don’t create a weapon of war like this not to use it 🔥

    • @littleponygirl666
      @littleponygirl666 15 днів тому

      Then how do you explain the stockpiles of nuclear weapons several countries have which have pretty much never been used?

  • @edl653
    @edl653 15 днів тому +7

    Human eyes go from Left to Right, not Top to Bottom. No reason to make vertical videos a even in watching on phone, phone can be oriented Left to Right.

    • @yikemoo
      @yikemoo 15 днів тому +1

      you're bucking the common, modern trend, like it or not that is how most people view on mobile, and he flat out said he is trying to keep up with trends

    • @edl653
      @edl653 15 днів тому +1

      @@yikemoo Lemmings follow trends. I understand the why, but maybe folks watch videos vertically on phones because they are produced in a vertical manner. If they were produced horizontally, folks would simply turn their phones 90 degrees. Either way, he makes good content.

    • @yikemoo
      @yikemoo 15 днів тому +1

      @@edl653 agreed he makes good stuff, and I am not a fan of the new format either, but its also not annoying enough to get me to stop watching

    • @yikemoo
      @yikemoo 15 днів тому +1

      @@edl653 and cut the guy some slack, he is running a business and that business depends on constant growth

  • @nimaiiikun
    @nimaiiikun 15 днів тому +3

    China realized they don't want Cope slope carriers. Maybe they can export this to Russia

  • @Fred-vy1hm
    @Fred-vy1hm 15 днів тому +2

    Nice looking ship but I doubt it would last an hour against a US carrier strike group.

    • @Davidlin-bc9yh
      @Davidlin-bc9yh 15 днів тому +1

      In fact, China is still a long way from being at the level of the United States in the military.

    • @J_X999
      @J_X999 15 днів тому

      Perun disagrees

    • @andrean2247
      @andrean2247 15 днів тому

      You mistakenly china for Us 😂

    • @user-cr9yu1dc9y
      @user-cr9yu1dc9y 15 днів тому

      Not even a second ,it has no threat, nothing more than a fishing boat.

  • @MauiWowie51
    @MauiWowie51 15 днів тому +2

    whats the deal with the narrow video? not watching.

    • @Ryuu1010YT
      @Ryuu1010YT 15 днів тому

      it's only using for phones.

  • @1001Balance
    @1001Balance 15 днів тому +3

    Does it come with superglue?

    • @alhkcblack9617
      @alhkcblack9617 15 днів тому +2

      They said made in China not made in USA😂

    • @6haha
      @6haha 15 днів тому +2

      Yes, super glue made in your country

    • @1001Balance
      @1001Balance 15 днів тому

      @@6haha of course, not the one in chinese baby foods 😂

    • @6haha
      @6haha 14 днів тому

      @@1001Balance 😄 baby food you had was with glue?

    • @1001Balance
      @1001Balance 14 днів тому

      @@6haha remember the 2008 chinese baby food melamine crisis? Chinese entrepreneurs will do everything to make a few extra bucks.

  • @outman1923
    @outman1923 14 днів тому +18

    In today's world, there are 190 countries, and China is the largest trading partner for 130 of them. This implies that China has a responsibility to possess the most powerful naval fleet on Earth, used to defend China and the majority of countries in the world from attacks by Anglo-Saxon pirate gangs. For example, China is India's largest trading partner. I believe Indians would also not want a situation where tomorrow, the United States suddenly demands that India stop importing goods from China, threatening to bomb India otherwise. If China has the strongest fleet, we can safeguard the trade security of both China and India.

    • @pennywise___
      @pennywise___ 14 днів тому +3

      LOL. At first I thought you were joking. Sorry to break it to you, Jack Sparrow and all those other pesky Anglo- Saxon pirates are fictional. It is just a movie.

    • @fixpontt
      @fixpontt 14 днів тому +1

      this comment maybe the first evidence that there is life after brain death

    • @yikemoo
      @yikemoo 14 днів тому +2

      Anglo-Saxon pirate gangs? OK, are you Chinese, or a North Korean speech writer?

    • @jaybee9269
      @jaybee9269 14 днів тому +4

      “Anglo-Saxon pirate gangs” is the funniest phrase ever!

    • @yikemoo
      @yikemoo 14 днів тому +1

      @@jaybee9269 I can't get this phrase out of my head, like every 20 minutes I just chuckle... "did he say anglo-saxon pirate gangs?"

  • @useronedeuce
    @useronedeuce 14 днів тому +2

    Clickbait

  • @mobius0691
    @mobius0691 14 днів тому +1

    Old format

  • @njabulolethukthula6854
    @njabulolethukthula6854 15 днів тому +7

    Blinkov is one of the best analysts ive ever come across hes very unbiased hes neither pro western or anti western like most analysts unfortunately though the comments are always filled with pro western idiots

    • @12b_engineer
      @12b_engineer 15 днів тому +3

      Tell us you are a red without telling us you are a red.

  • @oreroundpvp896
    @oreroundpvp896 15 днів тому +7

    In 10 years China will have 2 or 3 more of these things and then suddenly the naval status quo will look a whole lot different.

    • @edisonone
      @edisonone 15 днів тому

      Re: in ten years
      Nah!!! The Chinese are not out to compete with anyone.
      Their objective is absolutely “no Iraq, no Libya, no Syria, no Kosovo, and, no Vietnam War for them and…
      They are working towards making sure events like that don’t get any chance to happen to them…
      Sometimes however they are not at liberty to guaranteed that nothing like that will ever happen to them…
      .

  • @nikitatarsov5172
    @nikitatarsov5172 14 днів тому

    I like the new format for attention span reason

  • @kurtwicklund8901
    @kurtwicklund8901 15 днів тому +1

    Fujian, Chinese for white elephant.

    • @user-dr1yh5qs5b
      @user-dr1yh5qs5b 15 днів тому +7

      White elephant in Chinese is bai xiang. Fujian is just the name of Fujian Province and has nothing to do with White elephant.

    • @leean710
      @leean710 15 днів тому +4

      Fujian, the characters literally mean “Lucky Construction”, and name of a province. But I know what you meant. But here is my advice: underestimate China at west’s own peril.

    • @alhkcblack9617
      @alhkcblack9617 15 днів тому

      And White elephant is also Chinese nickname for your Mahthur 😂