WOW!! WHAT A FIGHT - George Foreman vs Axel Schulz, Full HD Highlights
Вставка
- Опубліковано 20 сер 2022
- We will be very happy with your subscription to the channel !!
WOW!! WHAT A FIGHT - George Foreman vs Axel Schulz, Full HD Highlights
"Ng_Ayman HD" channel brings you summaries of professional boxing fights. - Спорт
I’m a massive foreman fan. But Schultz won this. George just couldn’t handle Schultz pace the whole fight. George was gifted this fight but was robbed himself against Shannon briggs. A peak Shannon briggs who George battered for 12 rounds and lost a disgraceful decision in George’s last ever fight.
Foreman landed more punches and hit harder. And was more aggressive. The only argument for Schulz winning is the state of Foreman's face. It was a draw for me.
Many boxers have been robbered by f0cking judges and promoters.
Watched this live back in the day. Couldn't agree more. Schultz won this fight. I'll give Foreman this...I couldn't believe he never went down once after getting some of those shots. The decision was what was best for business, not straight down the line call it like I see it. But that's real life I suppose
@@opentime912
Stop embarrassing yourself.
Foreman was 46.
The fact that he's got the balls to fight 20 year olds in their prime, SPEAKS VOLUMES
Foreman was scared of this kid after this fight. I watched this match live when I was a teenager and I thought Foreman lost. This fight alone could make a person lose their faith in professional sports, it's almost like the outcome was predetermined like professional wrestling. Foreman wasn't confident that he won this fight that's why he never gave Schulz a rematch. He only had confidence in facing tomato cans for the rest of his career and he dodged true contenders. I'm not trying to degrade George Foreman honestly I know he was older, and he didn't have the stamina he used to have, I get it. He wanted to get the world title back, that was his goal and that was it. You know he could have just retired as world champion and left it at that.
Foreman is scared?are you dreaming😂😂😂..schulz was very lucky because foreman is out on his prime😂😂
@@martinreyvillayag that's exactly my point. He was his prime. That's why he didn't want to fight Axle Schultz again. Foreman got lucky in this fight and he didn't want try his luck again.
I didn't know that holyfield, morrison, moorer and briggs were tomato cans
@@logan-gg6mu he didn't defend his title against those guys. He may have fought them before he won the title but he didn't defend it against them.
@@1981CrueHead what a difference there is, he was in his 40s and he faced several top boxers from the 90s, they had to rob him against briggs in 97 to prevent him from winning and leave the 90s boxers bad
George looked very tired, especially from the start of the match
Bei diesem Kampf hatte Schulz noch eine gewisse Leichtigkeit und konnte zeigen, dass er ein guter Boxer war.
Danach hat er dieses Niveau nie wieder erreicht weil er dem Druck und den Erwartungen mental nicht gewachsen war.
Schade!
Aber er ist trotzdem ein netter Kerl.
Ja was du nicht sagst voll der Loser gegen einen 20 Jahre älteren Foreman 😅😅😅
Big up for Axel! i know him as a boxer! such talent,and a great guy
After the Hagler hearnsfight I started looking at sports differently then this fight sealed the deal and I knew it was all about entertainment. No way did George win this fight
You mean Hagler Antefurmo
@@ericmatterson9905 Or Hagler-Leonard?
@PhilAndersonOutside That fight could have been ruled either way. Hagler landed the harder punches but SRL landed a higher volume.
I WATCH THE WHOLE FIGHT LIVE, NO WAY IN THAT RING GEORGE FOREMAN WON THAT FIGHT, MORE THAN HIGHWAY ROBBERY
Clearly, its a popularity contest. They gave the win to the smiling fan favorite, George.
Schulz definitely beat Foreman
Ok Schulz landed more shots but people forgot:
George was 46 and without the fire of the Holyfield/ Moorer matches
Schulz run and never land bigger shots
The young Foreman would eat Schulz alive
If Boxing is all about who is popular. then let it be for the popular alone, G. Foreman lost this fight fair and square, Its a pure shit for the judges to give this fight to Foreman. Alex was robbed that even Foreman himself was ashame to celebrate his fake win,
Foreman landed more punches.
Yeah this was a pretty bad decision! Schulz deserved this one!
I read somewhere-and where I can’t remember-that Foreman basically…..”gifted”…a person or persons of importance a fairly large sum of money in order to help ensure that he’d be on the winning end of this decision. I don’t know if it’s true or not; I’m sure Foreman would say it’s not. Regardless of who says what, I will say that the scorecards were a bit fishy.
Sometimes if you are a challenger need to beatdown down or knockout your opponent😊😊
No bribe, I think Foreman was beloved and the judges didn't want him to lose his title to an unknown
Axel told decades later that he was chosen as he was known for not being a knockouter.
I am not a big fan of stripping guys of their titles but after hand-picking this kid and then dodging the mandated rematch, George made it clear he had no intention of defending his championship.
Age had caught up to him. Look at the state of his face. Guy was pushing 50. He was like the Terminator most of his career (especially when he came back) but the last few fights his face started to swell up badly. And around the eyes makes it impossible to fight properly.
Stop embarrassing yourself.
The fact that a 46 year old is fighting men in their prime, speaks volumes about his BALLS.
Tyson could NEVER fight prime boxers at 46, because he had no balls
Foreman called Schulz a "Tasmanian Devil". If you don't know what that means watch a documentary about these animals. 😊
Wow !!What a ripoff in my own Country.
Foreman landed more punches so how is this a ripoff? Stick to watching cartoons kid.
@@googlemyself4091 Easy there, Mr. Foreman. No reason to snap at us whippersnappers for voicing an opinion!
@@googlemyself4091 Who won the round, kiddo? Stick to being a casual
Schultz did too much running.. backing up etc...
I still think he won but he should have fought more.
Le afanaron la pelea a Schulz fue quien tiro más golpes ganó por poquito jurado lamentable
I think Shultz did enough to beat the champion.
Schultz clearly win.. But it's America 😂 the land of injustice
Karma for foreman came 2 years later in his last fight against briggs was stolen from him, there is his justice for schulz
Justice is, if you were robbed, you rob others... and thats okay? 🤦🤦♂🤦♀
Look at the face of foreman , look at his eye same a big egg
It's a myth. In no way shape or form did Schulz deserve the win. I viewed a high-quality tape of the entire fight in the slowest motion setting with the volume turned off. That way I didn't have to listen to commentators Gil Clancy and Jim Lampley rave in awe for all those shots by Schulz that did not find their target. For the record, I had Foreman clearly winning rounds 1, 2, 3, 6, 7, 8, and 11. 115/113 just as two of the three judges scored it. Even Larry Merchant, who had poked fun at George in the past, especially in the Holyfield and Alex Stewart fights, the former of which he called a "massacre" by Holyfield and the latter a "one point" win for Stewart had George winning here. Just because Schulz, an unknown, given little to no chance of winning and exceeded expectations does not mean he deserved to win. All that grappling and grunting by Schulz in close does not make his offense more effective. Foreman frequently drove Axel back with those jabs. Schulz spent much of the fight circling and back-peddling. He was largely ineffective having to throw from a distance so when he did manage to land his punches lacked effect as they barely made contact. Foreman landed the more authoritative punches with solid jabs, body shots, and the occasional but very effective uppercut.
Also Axel jetzt im ernst... wie kann man gegen einen alten Mann verlieren, bzw nicht klar gewinnen...!!???
Axel hatte einfach keinen Bumms in den Händen
kann sein, aber foreman auf die bretter zu schicken schafft fast keiner.
@@rallzam war von mir auch mehr allg. gemeint. Der Schulz hat so gut wie niemanden auf die Bretter geschickt. Daher auch sein Spitzname.