Why Are Rolex Watches So Expensive?

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 26 сер 2018
  • Why are Rolex watches so expensive? Why does the value of Rolex watches keep increasing?
    SUBSCRIBE TO US -► bit.ly/TheInfographicsShow
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------
    WEBSITE (SUGGEST A TOPIC):
    theinfographicsshow.com
    SUPPORT US:
    Patreon.......► / theinfographicsshow
    SOCIAL:
    Twitter........► / theinfoshow
    Subreddit...► / theinfographicsshow
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------
    Sources for this episode: pastebin.com/uBBezKDg

КОМЕНТАРІ • 5 тис.

  • @TheInfographicsShow
    @TheInfographicsShow  5 років тому +443

    What is the most important thing for you when choosing a watch?

  • @minecraftlover6457
    @minecraftlover6457 4 роки тому +2205

    UA-cam is getting really bold with the double adds

    • @galaxi407
      @galaxi407 4 роки тому +125

      They'll be charging us to have an account next.

    • @dougdavis6737
      @dougdavis6737 4 роки тому +16

      Preach! 👏🏼

    • @WatchTheVideosOnline
      @WatchTheVideosOnline 4 роки тому +18

      that’s why you gotta get youtube red.. it’s honestly worth it 🤷🏽‍♂️ especially if you don’t have cable and only use netflix

    • @joallen2004
      @joallen2004 4 роки тому +6

      Minecraft Lover I got premium 🤣🤣💀

    • @utsavpokharel7257
      @utsavpokharel7257 4 роки тому +12

      I thought it was spelled as ads

  • @115xrayburner
    @115xrayburner 5 років тому +4891

    Nothing beats the Omnitrix from Ben 10

    • @StoSpeaks
      @StoSpeaks 5 років тому +44

      True

    • @taha3600
      @taha3600 5 років тому +88

      you sir have made my day LOL

    • @Adrian-tu6kx
      @Adrian-tu6kx 5 років тому +42

      As if you can buy the real Omnitrix..

    • @moizkhan231
      @moizkhan231 5 років тому +19

      You cant check the time!

    • @paulc83
      @paulc83 5 років тому +30

      @@moizkhan231 it checks you

  • @mnynlvr4347
    @mnynlvr4347 5 років тому +1573

    A Rolex is the type of watch that you would buy in your 30’s and still wear in your 80’s

    • @tinton08568
      @tinton08568 4 роки тому +79

      Thats why you buy a Rolex to have a watch for live and pass it down to your childeren

    • @pureconfuzion
      @pureconfuzion 4 роки тому +15

      And then what?

    • @testserver2054
      @testserver2054 4 роки тому +10

      Rawan A. Wdym then what it’s a watch that you can pass down as a memento of your relatives

    • @hrly.d5745
      @hrly.d5745 4 роки тому +62

      @NexusGen Inc. rolex watches style never get old

    • @DrNoxin
      @DrNoxin 4 роки тому +33

      @NexusGen Inc. OK boomer

  • @kristiansantosa2997
    @kristiansantosa2997 5 років тому +417

    Finally, a video without advertisement at the end (Skillshare, Wix etc.)
    Then I realised the entire video was advertisement from Rolex.....

    • @yourlocalmilkman916
      @yourlocalmilkman916 4 роки тому +3

      Well the title is already talking about rolex so its understandable

    • @johnatspray
      @johnatspray 4 роки тому +2

      I think it was quite accurate. If you like it, want it and can afford it, you should buy it. It is a luxury item that will hold its value very nicely while you enjoy it. :-)

    • @dsargsyan23
      @dsargsyan23 2 роки тому

      That is why u wont wear it but someone else will

  • @kaby3183
    @kaby3183 5 років тому +2189

    Bob- What's the time ?
    Rolex owner- Takes out his phone

    • @iconicjet3043
      @iconicjet3043 5 років тому +94

      Bc no rolex owner actually uses it as a watch

    • @bigmaple6916
      @bigmaple6916 5 років тому +167

      @@iconicjet3043 wow you found out the joke! Great job

    • @Sakixlover
      @Sakixlover 5 років тому +73

      @@iconicjet3043 watches are more of an accessory than a tool nowadays bcs our phone clock is way more accurate

    • @biggie10101
      @biggie10101 5 років тому +10

      lmfao i can relate af

    • @harshmellow2006
      @harshmellow2006 5 років тому +15

      @@iconicjet3043 Im sorry, but i have to do this.
      WOOOOOOOOOOOOOOSH

  • @shinnyii
    @shinnyii 5 років тому +2147

    Can’t beat my $6 hello kitty watch I got travelling to japan.

    • @mrsqueakthecat.8061
      @mrsqueakthecat.8061 5 років тому +49

      And it's likely more accurate than the rolex +- 2 seconds a day standards too!

    • @petersmulders8058
      @petersmulders8058 5 років тому +29

      It’s better then the Rolex because it’s lighter :)

    • @kotletmaker328
      @kotletmaker328 4 роки тому +9

      @@mrsqueakthecat.8061 for an automatic watch that's actually spectacular.

    • @ahpinge2777
      @ahpinge2777 4 роки тому +6

      @@Allysoncociuba i would get the watch. sell it. and get myself more anime watches

    • @slayer8045
      @slayer8045 4 роки тому +1

      xBeasty priceless

  • @dr.kalculator6698
    @dr.kalculator6698 4 роки тому +361

    I am waiting for "And today's sponsor is Rolex"

    • @cdub1059
      @cdub1059 4 роки тому +8

      They don't need that sponsor

    • @Jorj57
      @Jorj57 3 роки тому +3

      why would they even lol

    • @bananaassasin7514
      @bananaassasin7514 2 роки тому

      Rolex is a private brand and does not do sponsorships Rolex also owns tutor which is like an affordable Rolex

    • @dotover9046
      @dotover9046 2 роки тому

      @@bananaassasin7514 Actually Rolex prefer to partner with high end sporting events such as F1, Tennis, Golf and Yacht Racing

  • @talhajat3301
    @talhajat3301 4 роки тому +70

    If i wear a $30,000 watch on my hand....I wont be able to wear it casually, I'll go crazy checking if there are scratches, etc.

    • @duke9081
      @duke9081 3 роки тому +3

      Sounds about right

    • @time2livelife
      @time2livelife 3 роки тому +3

      I think they have some sort of lifetime guarantee for repairs or something

    • @avarmauk
      @avarmauk 2 роки тому +3

      The feeling wears off after the first few scratches. Then you have a 30k watch that can withstand anything you throw at it.

    • @avarmauk
      @avarmauk 2 роки тому +2

      @@time2livelife they offer a 5 year warranty. But if you regularly service your watch it should last a lifetime and more.

    • @bronx_xu2653
      @bronx_xu2653 2 роки тому

      @@time2livelife unfortunately not, there is only warranty for a few years, and regular servicing is not covered. And each service can cost hundreds.

  • @kysputnikable
    @kysputnikable 5 років тому +1232

    A Rolex can make u late for an appointment because u might be robbed along the way

    • @MrSupervin94
      @MrSupervin94 5 років тому +14

      AHAHAHAHAHAHAHA You won

    • @shrilakshmiraghu4710
      @shrilakshmiraghu4710 5 років тому +4

      Ahahaha

    • @phamdinhhoang1998
      @phamdinhhoang1998 5 років тому

      when you walked in marina bay sands, wearing rolex might a high roller, but at Paiza, there is only richard mille.

    • @sr1g
      @sr1g 5 років тому +2

      the no battery tech normally makes them run fast. so it will even out

    • @moonlightaffairs
      @moonlightaffairs 5 років тому

      LOL

  • @paulwilli2850
    @paulwilli2850 5 років тому +2128

    Did i just watch a 7 min Rolex add?

    • @sowhat305
      @sowhat305 5 років тому +18

      Yes sir!

    • @NirazanShrestha
      @NirazanShrestha 5 років тому +83

      No, if it was an ad, we wouldnt be the target audience :P

    • @bramble8109
      @bramble8109 5 років тому +22

      Nirajan Shrestha// When it comes to ads, everyone is target audience.

    • @pesshots1599
      @pesshots1599 5 років тому +1

      Genius 👏👏👏

    • @gaspervidmar7593
      @gaspervidmar7593 5 років тому +9

      You processed it as an ad, it was the most concrete idea of the video for you. You want it to be an ad as much as you want the Rolex

  • @Trentstone121
    @Trentstone121 5 років тому +570

    "Although expensive, anyone can buy one, if they save up, or get a high paying job."
    No duh.....

    • @johnazhderian5734
      @johnazhderian5734 5 років тому +62

      If you make a middle-class salary spending $8,000 on a watch is insane.

    • @CaptainLouis
      @CaptainLouis 4 роки тому +8

      @@johnazhderian5734 exactly.

    • @Dan1el3780
      @Dan1el3780 4 роки тому +4

      Gerit Flesner a rolex costs under 2000

    • @andresperez7218
      @andresperez7218 4 роки тому +2

      Young Dripsta yeah but it is still not worth it getting a Rolex for 3000 you could buy many other watches and more

    • @fork_film3291
      @fork_film3291 4 роки тому +2

      I can just buy a standard 20$ watch

  • @albs6989
    @albs6989 4 роки тому +101

    My lecturer owns a Rolex, yet he’s always late to class...

    • @christopherangeli1141
      @christopherangeli1141 3 роки тому +6

      My lecturer flashed his around too. Always resting his arm in uncomfortable looking positions to make it visible at all times.

    • @anneliselim602
      @anneliselim602 3 роки тому

      This shows that rolex is no longer a symbol of luxury, at least in America. Anyone from a lecturer to a clerk wears rolex.

    • @DantesInferno96
      @DantesInferno96 3 роки тому

      To be fair traditional watches aren't going to stay top of the game forever. This is the digital era. Smartwatches are getting more popular every year. If Rolex wants, maybe they can progress in this area. These days people want a freaking blood pressure and sugar monitor on their wrists which can also play music and answer calls.

    • @theannouncer5538
      @theannouncer5538 3 роки тому

      In his head: I don’t operate on peasant time

    • @aryandhande
      @aryandhande 2 роки тому

      Lol 😂 😂

  • @yourfangirlselina9210
    @yourfangirlselina9210 5 років тому +980

    i'm too broke to be watching this

    • @Tsukiko.97
      @Tsukiko.97 5 років тому +23

      I'll send yall broke boys a ladder so you can reach my level.

    • @evanzheng5986
      @evanzheng5986 5 років тому +36

      Abyssinia Empire how bout you send us some cash

    • @tenn3ooo418
      @tenn3ooo418 5 років тому +26

      Abyssinia Empire You’re going to need a real long ladder if you want us to go that low.

    • @Tsukiko.97
      @Tsukiko.97 5 років тому +1

      @@evanzheng5986 I'd be broke on just having to pay the transactions fees themself!

    • @Tsukiko.97
      @Tsukiko.97 5 років тому +3

      @@tenn3ooo418 Why you doin me dirty! I'd never said I was high up 😒

  • @UNKNOWN-mj6lf
    @UNKNOWN-mj6lf 5 років тому +615

    "Hold my beer"
    **Whips out my minnion watch**

  • @tdotz5537
    @tdotz5537 5 років тому +264

    *sponsored by rolex*

  • @beugemyster8961
    @beugemyster8961 4 роки тому +42

    If I had a dollar for every time he said Rolex I'd have enough to buy one

  • @yehm813
    @yehm813 5 років тому +557

    I would say Ads are getting smarter but no one needs to advertise Rolex

    • @frrogg1
      @frrogg1 5 років тому

      Jake paul already did it lmao

    • @irou95
      @irou95 5 років тому

      they sponsor f1 that is watched mostly in tv..

    • @6infinity8
      @6infinity8 5 років тому +1

      Some buildings at my university such as the library are sponsored by Rolex.

    • @dominicnalan942
      @dominicnalan942 5 років тому

      @ivan arciniegas yeah. They sponsor Wimbledon

    • @gaspervidmar7593
      @gaspervidmar7593 5 років тому

      hahahah get smarter or you're done for

  • @kanekikun6312
    @kanekikun6312 5 років тому +627

    I was expecting the video to start like - *This video is sponsored by Rolex*

    • @caverys
      @caverys 5 років тому +4

      You smart, i like that.

    • @TheJasonleong1996
      @TheJasonleong1996 5 років тому +2

      Got an add with Rolex before the video start.

    • @xeno3556
      @xeno3556 5 років тому +4

      That is probably very unlikely the have you ever wondered why you never see Lamborghini, Rolex and other expensive brands doing ads on tv? Its because their target customers are rich people that can afford their products. And usually rich people dont spend time watching tv or youtube. :)

    • @AzamKhan-qy8gl
      @AzamKhan-qy8gl 5 років тому +2

      Do you beleive in rolex sponsoring something like this?

    • @bridgecross
      @bridgecross 5 років тому +3

      I wasn't expecting it at the beginning, but by the end I expected to see that. They didn't break down the cost of the watch at all.

  • @braedonmorrissey7548
    @braedonmorrissey7548 4 роки тому +50

    “This video was sponsored by Vincero”😂

  • @pstamatiou
    @pstamatiou 5 років тому +370

    james bond wears omegas since the '90s

    • @imranhq13
      @imranhq13 5 років тому

      why?

    • @pstamatiou
      @pstamatiou 5 років тому +43

      @@imranhq13 probably because they pay more than rolex :)

    • @imranhq13
      @imranhq13 5 років тому +1

      @Jim Beam you have no idea how much government employees are paid :)

    • @Shepard_AU
      @Shepard_AU 5 років тому +14

      He also wore Seiko’s prior to that

    • @seanng33
      @seanng33 5 років тому +9

      Sean Connery did wear a rolex

  • @visibleconfusion9894
    @visibleconfusion9894 5 років тому +2374

    The best watch in the world is the one and only Pipboy 4000

    • @thebluezoo7959
      @thebluezoo7959 5 років тому +18

      Hey I recommend to not upload a video because its gonna ruin ur channel trust me maybe make a reddit ** or u know but not a yt video and ur channel name is ofc called 5000 subs no vids

    • @simplyzayan8805
      @simplyzayan8805 5 років тому +15

      In 2077 that is

    • @simplyzayan8805
      @simplyzayan8805 5 років тому

      And it’s a portable pc wrist watch

    • @220ver7
      @220ver7 5 років тому +17

      no its the Piboy 3000 ):

    • @_JustMarss
      @_JustMarss 5 років тому +1

      yes it is my man

  • @VyperEye89
    @VyperEye89 5 років тому +245

    There are dozens of Swiss watch companies with higher standards than Rolex. The problem with them is that they spend little on marketing which is why most people outside of the watch community have no idea they exist.

    • @nicollyfarao2401
      @nicollyfarao2401 5 років тому +6

      Of course! This is a an absolutely true!

    • @the_crypter
      @the_crypter 5 років тому +41

      I don't think that's a problem for them, they do that intentionally to keep the demand less thus providing hand made quality watches. Also it makes an even more exclusive clubs.

    • @imatakeabreakgorl8387
      @imatakeabreakgorl8387 5 років тому +8

      VyperEye89 what are the name of the companies? I might wanna snag a watch that’s cheaper then a Rolex but better standards.

    • @jeanisabelle
      @jeanisabelle 5 років тому +15

      Could you give some examples? Would love to check them out.

    • @sparkerlight9121998
      @sparkerlight9121998 5 років тому +1

      VyperEye89 yes examples pls

  • @yesferowh
    @yesferowh 4 роки тому +65

    Doesn’t James Bond usually wear Omega?

    • @jackjerry5059
      @jackjerry5059 4 роки тому +2

      yesferowh yep

    • @gerald9317
      @gerald9317 4 роки тому +3

      James bond used to wear rolex till the 90s and then he became the face of omega. Yes james bold used to wear rolex but couldnt they put someone else?

    • @F15ElectricEagle
      @F15ElectricEagle 4 роки тому +3

      Yep, and he has also been known to wear Seiko and Pulsar.

  • @alexanderprince8032
    @alexanderprince8032 4 роки тому +14

    Ironically, anyone that knows anything about watches can name dozens of brands which are more expensive.

    • @johnnydkota5709
      @johnnydkota5709 3 роки тому +2

      How’s that ironic

    • @Nobodyss21
      @Nobodyss21 3 роки тому

      Richard milles

    • @alexanderprince8032
      @alexanderprince8032 3 роки тому

      JohnnyD Kota because anyone who knows anything about watches will say that the cost of a Rolex is fairly modest for what you get

    • @alexanderprince8032
      @alexanderprince8032 3 роки тому +1

      Adiastra Teja and patek Philippe

  • @youtubiu
    @youtubiu 5 років тому +414

    I'm happy with my Casio Calculator Watch...

    • @zhengwenwang5140
      @zhengwenwang5140 5 років тому +5

      Me too..... I’m just happy for having a G-Shock

    • @nekilik2731
      @nekilik2731 5 років тому +1

      I have a q&q.They buy Casios old mechanisms and sell it 10 times cheaper

    • @Wilbur-em1hw
      @Wilbur-em1hw 5 років тому +3

      Happy wid my ga 100

    • @tylercbmiller7062
      @tylercbmiller7062 5 років тому +2

      Lucas V. The original smart watch

    • @usmang.a7770
      @usmang.a7770 5 років тому +3

      Ima happy with my fake Rolex...

  • @ratnakarsingh6757
    @ratnakarsingh6757 5 років тому +2819

    Brand name makes a lot of money just like Apple.

    • @JKCWvids
      @JKCWvids 5 років тому +211

      so i guess you didnt watch the video then. because most of it is talking about the craftsmanship and design. how they even smelt their own material and its all swiss made.

    • @Jerry.V
      @Jerry.V 5 років тому +44

      Idiot.....

    • @JimBeamFiend53
      @JimBeamFiend53 5 років тому +11

      or harley davidson

    • @heikanaomi4426
      @heikanaomi4426 5 років тому +5

      biem biem don't be mean:)

    • @glitch42
      @glitch42 5 років тому +1

      Graff watches are bettet

  • @JackFranco95
    @JackFranco95 4 роки тому +16

    Compared to some watches, Rolex really ain’t all that expensive.

    • @jamescody2003
      @jamescody2003 2 роки тому

      @Channel.Of.Crz97' I don’t know about that

  • @abbasegbeyemi
    @abbasegbeyemi 4 роки тому +19

    This seriously looked like a Rolex infomercial.

  • @ferg9317
    @ferg9317 5 років тому +283

    So basically the Redbull marketing of the 1900's

  • @uzomamba2660
    @uzomamba2660 5 років тому +201

    The Ben 10 watch is better😂

    • @tank_m3_tanker575
      @tank_m3_tanker575 5 років тому +1

      Yeaaaaa

    • @latticelovelybmhph847
      @latticelovelybmhph847 5 років тому +1

      Hahaha lmao

    • @annasazis2394
      @annasazis2394 5 років тому

      Yea his watches is op

    • @dikshantchaubey1922
      @dikshantchaubey1922 5 років тому +5

      *Omnitrix*

    • @Som3D
      @Som3D 5 років тому

      If it existed in real life and works
      It would but Rolex to trash
      Probably would cost $10,000,000,000,000,000
      Only can get that much money if you get huge diamond from another planet

  • @andrewshih1007
    @andrewshih1007 4 роки тому +30

    Patek Phillipe, “Am I a joke to you?”

  • @kytv9000
    @kytv9000 5 років тому +11

    When first time visiting a Rolex store, I was travelling alone in a foreign country for an academic conference, the Rolex store was reluctant to open the door for a poor looking student. And the staff there looked unpleasant as they knew people like me would never buy a watch there in the first place. That all said, even if I one day can afford to buy many of those watches, I will never buy one. Can't find a single reason except to impress someone in a brief encounter by showing off filthy richness.

  • @l7bsi
    @l7bsi 5 років тому +383

    correct title: The history of ROLEX

    • @hafidzimad8448
      @hafidzimad8448 5 років тому +7

      The history is the why

    • @xxnightwalker6323
      @xxnightwalker6323 5 років тому

      @@hafidzimad8448 I would say that the information is given for a conclusion to be drawn, but he fails to do so

  • @sarsifbwoy3645
    @sarsifbwoy3645 5 років тому +368

    Am proud of my Casio watch.

    • @snowxyy
      @snowxyy 5 років тому +8

      Sarsif bwoy Casio have some damn expansive watches also

    • @roubiyou89
      @roubiyou89 5 років тому +12

      my Casio Silver (A158W-1) was given to me in 2012 as a used watch, and I never took it off my hands. It 's a great practical watch

    • @iffykonvicted
      @iffykonvicted 5 років тому +2

      Me too 🤭

    • @RandomGuy-db7qx
      @RandomGuy-db7qx 5 років тому +1

      Same man same

    • @AtlasReburdened
      @AtlasReburdened 5 років тому +7

      Signature watch of Al-Qaeda bomb makers.

  • @alabamadeep4471
    @alabamadeep4471 Рік тому +2

    I own 3 Rolex watches. One from 1954. Still waterproof and still running with zero seconds lost in time per day. I'm also a rolex watchmaker.

    • @johnjones1873
      @johnjones1873 Рік тому

      I got my father's GMT...then i got myself a Tudor GMT...they both run like tanks....and being a chef...my time pieces need to be hearty.....that said...i also own a 30yr old stainless steel Timex...that has been boiled burned and grilled....and still keeps A-1 time...i bought a Seiko that broke after 2yrs of use...am currently trying out my new stainless G-Shock...to see if it can take the same abuse as my 3 favorite watches ...Rolex..Tudor...Timex👍👍👍👍

  • @awanijasharma8816
    @awanijasharma8816 5 років тому

    Thanks for the info. Loved the presentation of the video. 👌👍 Wish you good luck 🍀

  • @kilzyhere1797
    @kilzyhere1797 5 років тому +589

    Did they give you a free Rolex?

    • @eddypowell9736
      @eddypowell9736 5 років тому +32

      Agreed. Has the feel of an infomercial.

    • @joshuamyat5312
      @joshuamyat5312 5 років тому +21

      They put him on the waiting list

    • @trevbarlow9719
      @trevbarlow9719 5 років тому +15

      Totally. The part I that stands out like a sore thumb is when he says that it's hard to find watches at a similar quality. For that price, it's not that hard.

    • @joemama069
      @joemama069 4 роки тому +1

      @@trevbarlow9719 fr tho what about Breitling Hublot Patek and AP

    • @trevbarlow9719
      @trevbarlow9719 4 роки тому +4

      @@joemama069 Indeed. Even modern Omega.

  • @andrewstephen_
    @andrewstephen_ 5 років тому +19

    6:45 *cough* Patek Philippe *cough"

    • @kianaadams2432
      @kianaadams2432 4 роки тому +1

      Andrew Stephen Christian plenty of other brands. Just depends on price range.
      Best value for money under $100 is Invicta.
      Best value for money under $2,000 would have to go to Omega.
      If you have money for a Patek, why not get 3 Rolex lol

  • @Eduy02
    @Eduy02 4 роки тому +12

    AP, Patek, A. Lange u. Söhne, Richard Mille and many more make really beautiful and expensive watches.

    • @siddharthsharma2203
      @siddharthsharma2203 3 роки тому +7

      Bold of you to include Richard Mille in the list

    • @mr.personal-ity
      @mr.personal-ity 3 роки тому

      @@siddharthsharma2203
      Should have said Gruebel Forsey.

    • @CheesyCore
      @CheesyCore 2 роки тому

      Breguet, Chopard, Vacheron Constant, Seiko Crador, Jaeger LeCoultre, IWC, Jacob&co...

    • @CheesyCore
      @CheesyCore 2 роки тому

      @@siddharthsharma2203 definitely deserved, some of the finest haute horology advanced engineering and refined finishing in the world are made by RM
      the fact that they're new and unorthodox, doesn't mean they aren't in the same horology level as AP

  • @redd3a7h47
    @redd3a7h47 4 роки тому +3

    Something tells me that Infographic guy just got a Rolex.

  • @guyshepard9658
    @guyshepard9658 5 років тому +81

    That’s a lot of money for a watch. Just use a stick, string and the sun to tell the time.

    • @zeethanguo
      @zeethanguo 5 років тому +10

      arsam kiani wtf was that for? It was a joke

    • @b.luong2
      @b.luong2 5 років тому +2

      R/whoooosh

    • @satanael_el
      @satanael_el 5 років тому

      r/niceguys

    • @OhSoTiredMan
      @OhSoTiredMan 5 років тому

      Don't mind me flashing a light at it

  • @ReTread
    @ReTread 5 років тому +654

    Patek phillipe

  • @loremipsum8321
    @loremipsum8321 4 роки тому +21

    You can say that this is a watchable ad. hehe

  • @lxss_
    @lxss_ 2 роки тому +3

    "rolex is easy to say in any language" meanwhile in japanese where there's no r or l

  • @amarion
    @amarion 5 років тому +78

    *SPONSORED BY ROLEX*

    • @paultony4993
      @paultony4993 5 років тому

      Maybe

    • @cosmomoore6905
      @cosmomoore6905 5 років тому +1

      He called it a “submareener” it’s not fucking sponsored by rolex

  • @h.m708
    @h.m708 5 років тому +443

    why buy Rolex when you can just kindly contribute to my college tuition

    • @rikilamaru
      @rikilamaru 5 років тому +108

      because you waste your tuition on a useless gender studies degree, atleast the rolex is usefull

    • @h.m708
      @h.m708 5 років тому +117

      rikilamaru i’m actually still in high school and interested in biomedical engineering but thank you for that wonderful assumption

    • @debaucherous.hamster
      @debaucherous.hamster 5 років тому +23

      h.m lol nerd

    • @pedrodelacruz6943
      @pedrodelacruz6943 5 років тому +26

      Because you can’t tell me the time when I need it 😎

    • @Katsunai
      @Katsunai 5 років тому +21

      Cause Rolex won't let me down.

  • @161BMW
    @161BMW 5 років тому +39

    People buy Rolex just for a status symbol. Digital watches are more accurate. IMO.

    • @ryanminaker157
      @ryanminaker157 4 роки тому +4

      Quartz watches.

    • @carlitoxb110
      @carlitoxb110 4 роки тому +14

      some people love craftsmanship if you can afford it what's wrong with that? I love my Apple Watch but nothing beats a mechanical real watch

    • @faruqkhalifa5253
      @faruqkhalifa5253 4 роки тому +1

      @@carlitoxb110 it literally does beat the Rolex watch dude.

    • @cdub1059
      @cdub1059 4 роки тому

      most rolex models aren't any proof of status... they're not that expensive in the first place.. especially when you consider in the resale value.

    • @mr-fister
      @mr-fister 4 роки тому +2

      partly agree with you. I own a smart watch and it has a lot of handy benefits over a mechanical watch. Although a Rolex isn't only a status symbol, in a 10 year span a "cheap" ($5000) Rolex can already significantly rise in value. For instance a friend of mine saved up money for as long as I can remember and with 18 bought a Rolex for 5k. When he was 30 he sold it for 12k when he started a family and needed the money. Maybe I'm just biased bc I'm swiss and my grandfather used to work for Rolex for over 20 years, but I think it's a smart investment early on in your life if you are fortunate enough to be in the financial position to make the purchase.

  • @graeme3023
    @graeme3023 4 роки тому +14

    James Bond ( Daniel Craig), now wears an Omega in the newer movies rather than a Rolex.

    • @adityaudhani4386
      @adityaudhani4386 4 роки тому

      he still wears a rolex off the screen

    • @airmikeliu
      @airmikeliu 3 роки тому

      Lol I seen Craig Daniel wearing a Rolex gmt Pepsi.

    • @Jorj57
      @Jorj57 3 роки тому

      and then?

  • @Holycryptonite47
    @Holycryptonite47 5 років тому +459

    With all said and done
    *I still don't think I can buy that watch*

    • @spontaneousme3493
      @spontaneousme3493 5 років тому +4

      If you can buy also just don't fucking buy them, they are just too expensive and waste of money

    • @alphadmb3166
      @alphadmb3166 5 років тому +4

      try getting a job then?

    • @myman8336
      @myman8336 5 років тому +1

      I could, but then I'll have 0 dollars left..
      All that work I did in the summer gone like that... 😂

    • @chrisaponte5289
      @chrisaponte5289 5 років тому +1

      Alpha DMB is just not affordable for everybody, even if everyone had jobs.

    • @hobofinalflash1681
      @hobofinalflash1681 5 років тому

      With all said and done, I dont really care. I pay for what i think is worth. and my success isnt coming from a watch.

  • @xxrumlexx
    @xxrumlexx 5 років тому +67

    Theyre the king of branding, they take extremely good care of their workers. Overall theyre the standard in watchmaking. Many others break this standard though, both in quality and price.

  • @narwhal9852
    @narwhal9852 4 роки тому +2

    I guess Rolex can add a free 7 min ad to their list

  • @FiazKhanmiaminetwork
    @FiazKhanmiaminetwork 5 років тому +5

    Still don’t see the reason why it’s so expensive

  • @kazookreations3161
    @kazookreations3161 5 років тому +290

    The best watch has to be a watch from spongebob because it survived 19 years under water!

    • @muti6marinov655
      @muti6marinov655 5 років тому

      1k Subscribers With 1 Video Challenge ahahahahahahahahahhahhhyahahahahahahahyahaha

    • @mastermango1792
      @mastermango1792 5 років тому +1

      No the pipboy 4000 is the best watch in the world cause it survived a nuclear apocalypse XD

    • @THENETESH
      @THENETESH 5 років тому

      @@mastermango1792 yea dam right

    • @siva1ish
      @siva1ish 5 років тому +1

      My phone too show the same time as rolex does

    • @Vk_1111
      @Vk_1111 5 років тому

      Meme Kingdom ZXDDD LOLLAOSUJX HAHSHA

  • @ralphlani3184
    @ralphlani3184 5 років тому +194

    Take a shot every time he says Rolex

    • @DaBlokk420
      @DaBlokk420 5 років тому +5

      Drunk as hell but no throwing up

    • @lightludy5127
      @lightludy5127 5 років тому

      I am ehsdupxjxjrdrkakksksuchchhxhxhhcjjjcck

    • @tededcaluag2978
      @tededcaluag2978 5 років тому +8

      Take a rolex everytime he says shot

    • @John-doe955
      @John-doe955 5 років тому +2

      Ralph Lani that’s actually a tactic for this video to be more likely to become recommended

    • @AQUAPHREESH193
      @AQUAPHREESH193 5 років тому

      HELLO 9 - 11? LMAOAOAO

  • @kixi8033
    @kixi8033 4 роки тому +6

    I don't know why anyone would want an expensive watch, especially in this day and age.

  • @romanisrael4346
    @romanisrael4346 5 років тому

    My G-Shock Tough Solar MUDMAN, G9300 features direction and thermo sensors that can help you keep your bearing wherever your adventure takes you. A one-touch easy access button goes directly to compass & thermometer mode and a moon phase graph can help to determine whether the nighttime hours will be dark or light. A declination function even makes it possible to adjust the watch’s magnetic north direction reading to indicate true north. All of this, plus Tough Solar to keep everything working and Shock and Mud Resistance to keep it well protected. Black resin band digital watch with neutral face.

  • @kfir8
    @kfir8 5 років тому +113

    Honestly Rolex is the most well known watch but the finest wrist watches are Patek Philippe

    • @randomness6862
      @randomness6862 5 років тому +4

      Mike Samana I prefer Breitling. PP is expensive but not always the best

    • @ShahriyaIsIam
      @ShahriyaIsIam 5 років тому +7

      AP ma guy

    • @finkejak
      @finkejak 5 років тому +10

      True, though i'd still prefer a Jaeger LeCoultre, their Reverso series is just too sexy to dismiss.

    • @willthompson1919
      @willthompson1919 5 років тому +1

      I have a Two tone submariner and I prefer classy watches, I believe it is the only classy watch within Rolex, other than the plain steel one, overall, I definitely prefer Breitling, Rolex is a brand that is made for flexing, which imo even though I have one, isn't good.

    • @totallymedicore4246
      @totallymedicore4246 5 років тому +6

      Ok but what about audemars piguet

  • @joentell
    @joentell 5 років тому +220

    I'm not into watches (yet) but I would prefer to be a bit more low key than a Rolex. I like a Grand Seiko or an IWC personally. I just feel like fewer people would ask about it. Then again, I don't know about watches.

    • @michaelhorn8962
      @michaelhorn8962 5 років тому +15

      Seiko's Spring Drive is a true piece of engineering beauty!

    • @jasonamoako9729
      @jasonamoako9729 5 років тому +3

      So true 🙂

    • @benjaminfolan943
      @benjaminfolan943 5 років тому +6

      Go for a tudor. The company was founded by the same man who founded the rolex and it uses a lot of the same parts, though the movement isn't an in-house make and is less expensive- around 2-3k.

    • @sachinbansal4667
      @sachinbansal4667 5 років тому +12

      I just think that buying a Rolex is a sign of deficiency in a person's confidence or some deep insecurity. It serves no better purpose than a simple watch or a phone. The video is explaining what causes it to become expensive but it is missing out the main cause for the expense which is the multi fold profit they earn over the cost on each piece. It is just a sham and the video maker is in on it. Unsubscribe...

    • @markcrocodile5190
      @markcrocodile5190 5 років тому +31

      @@sachinbansal4667 u just broke, relax

  • @ohmyafy
    @ohmyafy 5 років тому +64

    It should be an A Lange & Sohne. But casuals would never know.

    • @chungusisamemer8167
      @chungusisamemer8167 4 роки тому

      It ain't more expensive

    • @eii_mk
      @eii_mk 4 роки тому

      @@chungusisamemer8167 it is

    • @eii_mk
      @eii_mk 4 роки тому

      @@chungusisamemer8167 or even Jacob&co astronomias can be worth $1m brand new

    • @chungusisamemer8167
      @chungusisamemer8167 4 роки тому

      @@eii_mk no, but close. It has a lower price, but still is expensive for "regular" people

    • @chungusisamemer8167
      @chungusisamemer8167 4 роки тому

      @@eii_mk 1.015.000$ for the astronomia tourbillon baguette

  • @bakbak4960
    @bakbak4960 5 років тому +3

    feels like this is an advertisement video 😂😂

  • @fbiagentmiyakohoshino8223
    @fbiagentmiyakohoshino8223 5 років тому +89

    roblox is more expensive then rolex

    • @fbiagentmiyakohoshino8223
      @fbiagentmiyakohoshino8223 5 років тому +2

      because 2 robux costs 2 billion usd

    • @frololaly.5399
      @frololaly.5399 5 років тому +1

      fakhrul islam lol true gamers will know that not kid fake gamers that play roblox haha lol

    • @mhdebek1
      @mhdebek1 5 років тому

      @@fbiagentmiyakohoshino8223 ea costs 10-300 billion

    • @mhdebek1
      @mhdebek1 5 років тому

      @@fbiagentmiyakohoshino8223 And 2 robux is not $2 million 2 is 0.01 cent

  • @yeahhyouvish
    @yeahhyouvish 5 років тому +141

    I use a $2 watch. Never let me down. 🙂

    • @zee2826
      @zee2826 5 років тому +3

      Toilet?

    • @sandeshbandekar8620
      @sandeshbandekar8620 5 років тому +25

      @@zee2826 your mouth..

    • @YankeeTM
      @YankeeTM 5 років тому

      At least you have that

    • @TheJumpingJake
      @TheJumpingJake 5 років тому

      yeah right hahaha, probs digital lol

    • @BrawndoQC
      @BrawndoQC 5 років тому +5

      Congrats on your life achievement.

  • @mahmoodmohammed240
    @mahmoodmohammed240 4 роки тому +8

    I just don't like it's looks, I almost always find other Swiss companies making more beautiful and interesting watches.

  • @ninosantillan5443
    @ninosantillan5443 5 років тому +1

    And this video my friend is another Rolex advertising strategy! 😂😂😂

  • @recyclebin8700
    @recyclebin8700 5 років тому +363

    *this video was sponsored by Rolex*

    • @AJ6spd
      @AJ6spd 5 років тому +8

      Rolex doesn't needs to lol

    • @jennyjohn704
      @jennyjohn704 5 років тому +2

      Status symbols need attention and hype. They don't have the required effect without a sufficient number sycophants bowing down to them.

    • @IShowLove69
      @IShowLove69 5 років тому +1

      I want

    • @powd46
      @powd46 5 років тому

      I don't think a Rolex customer will see that video.

    • @sovanpaul4459
      @sovanpaul4459 5 років тому

      Lol idiot, rolex doesn't need any promotion... Just like BMW, Lamborghini don't need any advertisement

  • @Rojawa
    @Rojawa 5 років тому +155

    Rolex is just the most known luxury watch brand but rather at the entry level.
    Look up Audemars Piguet, Patek Phillipe, A Lange und Söhne, Glashütte, Jacob & Co

    • @xtehmoonlight7400
      @xtehmoonlight7400 5 років тому +11

      Robin K
      Just tried google audemars piguet...man, those watch is so damn expensive...makes rolex look cute

    • @cannedolives
      @cannedolives 5 років тому +1

      I love Glashütte and all the other brands from the Swatch Group. 👀

    • @mercentperrault
      @mercentperrault 5 років тому +1

      Don't forget Omega.

    • @raghuveer4552
      @raghuveer4552 5 років тому +6

      Mercent Perrault Omega is way cheaper than Rolex

    • @rajitspdstr
      @rajitspdstr 5 років тому +1

      Heights of snobbery

  • @Sanjay116
    @Sanjay116 3 роки тому

    At first I thought there would be a Rolex ad in between. But the whole video in itself was an ad. Strange!

  • @henrygolayguitar8880
    @henrygolayguitar8880 4 роки тому +20

    This man really said Omega has worse quality than Rolex. The 8800 Omega movement is stunning

    • @hodb3906
      @hodb3906 2 роки тому +6

      Yeah, this video is just Rolex propaganda. Someone who says Rolex made the first waterproof wristwatch is just not checking their facts and parroting straight from their website. The submarine watch was documented waterproof and anti-magnetic and that was 10 years before the Rolex Oyster. So this video is bs mate, don’t worry.

    • @jeromel4563
      @jeromel4563 2 роки тому +1

      BRUHH tbh just get a grand seiko if you want precision.

    • @jamescody2003
      @jamescody2003 2 роки тому

      @@jeromel4563 spending money on a grand seiko is the stupidest thing ever, you wouldn’t spend 80,000 euro on a fiat punto

    • @jeromel4563
      @jeromel4563 2 роки тому +3

      @@jamescody2003 where did you come up with this conclusion?

  • @farthero5943
    @farthero5943 5 років тому +20

    I just taped nokia to my wrist ..

  • @greekatso
    @greekatso 5 років тому +41

    1:18 - "this model with a rotating dial", it's actually the bezel that rotates.

    • @stammyy2091
      @stammyy2091 5 років тому +3

      it just shows how clueless they really are

    • @jhmsmarttv795
      @jhmsmarttv795 5 років тому +1

      One out of many mistakes in this superficial video.

  • @matu6335
    @matu6335 4 роки тому +10

    Everyone : Rolex is the most luxury watch brand.
    Breitling : Am i joke to you?

  • @esinteressiertmichnicht1561
    @esinteressiertmichnicht1561 4 роки тому +4

    I bought my rolex with 14 and I have it still in my Collection

  • @PerformanceAudioLV
    @PerformanceAudioLV 5 років тому +54

    I've had a lot of inexpensive watches and they always broke. I got a submariner almost 20 years ago and after wearing it every day it's still going strong.

    • @bronx_xu2653
      @bronx_xu2653 2 роки тому +8

      It could be that since your sub is so expensive you take better care of it. In any case I'm sure you're not breaking watches so often that you would have spent $10,000 on watches over 20 years. That's a new $500 watch every year.

  • @John-zm4xl
    @John-zm4xl 5 років тому +177

    You think rolex's are expensive? TRY BUYING A USED PATEK PHILLIPE 😫😫😫😫😫

    • @rathneshrattu
      @rathneshrattu 5 років тому +4

      Its not the brand that rolex is .

    • @known3617
      @known3617 5 років тому +33

      A patek is still more expensive than a rolex unless you buy an iced out daytona hell a standard Steel nautilus is more expensive than over half of all the watches Rolex currently sells. This is about cost not what the brand is or isnt.

    • @rathneshrattu
      @rathneshrattu 5 років тому +2

      BalthazarTheGreat it may be . But does not put the statement what Rolex does . I bet it won't even have 10% of likes on social media of Rolex . Let's just say if both are given for free 90% people would prefer Rolex just for the brand . What sells , sells .

    • @higher1078
      @higher1078 5 років тому +35

      @@rathneshrattu not sure if you are trolling or what, but a patek beats rolex hands down. If you are looking for a high end watch that is exquisitely manufactured, chances are you are looking for a patek phillips. Rolex are for commoners that wish to ice out, patek phillips is for the truly rich and influential. Facts

    • @yeanjenchan9890
      @yeanjenchan9890 5 років тому +7

      Lol does people not know the value of patek phillipe? I’m actually amazed by these as they genuinely does not understand. Rolex watches are no longer in its prime. The workmanship of patek phillipe is really century proof

  • @rahulsharma-bl9lu
    @rahulsharma-bl9lu 5 років тому +8

    It doesn’t show the actual time but the time of a person

  • @D1ZAZTR
    @D1ZAZTR 4 роки тому +2

    if m not wrong bond wears omega?

  • @blooduhz
    @blooduhz 5 років тому +230

    Reason why I will never buy luxury watches no matter how rich I will be, is because of this quote I read long ago: "You can buy the most expensive watch you want, but you can never buy the time from it.'

    • @jhawkshaw
      @jhawkshaw 5 років тому

      It's same with buying diamonds and shit. I'd doubt that anybody with that much money would even consider that to be the first thing that comes onto their minds when thinking about what they want to buy. I'd rather get a nosejob with that money.

    • @SalumarLP
      @SalumarLP 5 років тому +13

      Reason I'll buy it: "It serves as a reminder, that time is truly valueable."

    • @ge0arc244
      @ge0arc244 5 років тому +1

      Oh contraire me bucko, You are buying time. The time it took to hand craft that watch by a master watch maker no less. Also the time it took for me (Some Dude in his undearwear) to write this to you! That is what makes it special, and I am not talking about my underwear it is TIME.............

    • @Embargoman
      @Embargoman 5 років тому

      True

    • @vangraff3478
      @vangraff3478 5 років тому +5

      It takes one good quote to convince you... thank god not everyone (not far from it being the case) is like you.

  • @adhirajkumar7187
    @adhirajkumar7187 5 років тому +2

    Infographics Show: Rolex watches are the most expensive
    Richard Mille: hold my Beer

  • @mayankpm9417
    @mayankpm9417 3 роки тому +6

    People sell their kidney to buy iPhones right, but even after I sell my wife and my kids, I still can't afford Rolex watches.

  • @SHARE577
    @SHARE577 5 років тому +503

    Nothing beats G-shock

    • @janjankovicjahoda
      @janjankovicjahoda 5 років тому +16

      My man :-D

    • @rustynugget2288
      @rustynugget2288 5 років тому +13

      lmao imagine having a battery in your watch. so dumb

    • @SHARE577
      @SHARE577 5 років тому +15

      Rusty Nugget Its obvious you don’t know enough about G-shock, in many cases there is no battery in the watch 😉

    • @ripvanced
      @ripvanced 5 років тому +1

      ryan axtell r/woooooosh

    • @MattTonite
      @MattTonite 5 років тому +7

      If it wasn’t for Rolex, your G-shock would never exist in the first place.

  • @Jack-gu4fc
    @Jack-gu4fc 5 років тому +20

    0:22 Slight inaccuracy: the watch shown on the right isn't the watch that was sold for 17 million. It was actually Paul Newman's personal Rolex Paul Newman Daytona.

  • @esperanzamontford3406
    @esperanzamontford3406 4 роки тому

    Lol an advertisement for another watch appeared when I was watching this

  • @justinweisberg1634
    @justinweisberg1634 3 роки тому

    3:44
    SEIKO: Hold my beer🍺

  • @prasad5703
    @prasad5703 5 років тому +540

    All the comments are saying rolex is so over hyped and expensive but there is a reason to it as it is explained in the video. Same goes for the other brands like Apple, Beats by Dr.Dre these products are so expensive because they are marketed better than other products and manufactured using some expensive materials. A Rolls Royce costs so much because they are 98% or 99% hand crafted. These brands put a lot details in their products unlike many of the other products on the market. Apple introduced dual cameras, notch in their smartphones and look other brands are making their smartphones with dual cameras and even Google Pixel 3 has notch. I don't have money to buy these products but i appreciate that they are well made and are worth the cost.

    • @karotakekashi4520
      @karotakekashi4520 5 років тому +91

      Unfortunately I think Rolex is the only reasonably priced product lines compared to the two examples you gave.
      Apple build and material quality is worsening, designs and current model for the "high premium" macbook lines belong in the bin along with the fact that a laptop at half the price or less has more power than their higher priced models, and stacked with lawsuits over it.
      Beats are much, much too overpriced for what they offer to other high-end headphones. Is it okay? Sure. It's not failing constantly or suffering from lazy engineering. But if you want actual high-end sound quality, you will not be getting that from the high price premium of a Beats.
      As for your last point about others copying Apple;
      They're being idiots. They're copying Apple's bad side. Why the notch? Should leave it as is. Looks stylistically ugly in exchange for just a little more screen space. They should be copying their marketing or their tightly-connected ecosystem. Not their design flaws.

    • @prasad5703
      @prasad5703 5 років тому +4

      @@karotakekashi4520 i agree that beats is way overpriced but people buy it because it is marketed in like almost all the music videos, many other headphones are better than beats for ex Sennheiser but u dont see them marketed so much so people dont know about them. Same goes for Apple i know there are so many great smarphones out there but Apple has 70-80 % share in smartphone industry which os mainly because of their marketing of products. You cant skip an Apple ad on YT u have to watch it till it ends things like that. Some of these products are worth it some are expensive beacuse of their maketing. At the end we the consumers have to decide what to buy.

    • @karotakekashi4520
      @karotakekashi4520 5 років тому +6

      Exactly. Their marketing is top-notch, undeniably.

    • @sasukeuchiha998
      @sasukeuchiha998 5 років тому +10

      Or you know, riot when there is an issue. Rolex seems to be worth the value. Apple not so much. Turns out they cheapen their goods, design flaws into products to fail sooner, and to make repairs nearly impossible by their own technician to encourage people to buy more.

    • @ronaldtartaglia4459
      @ronaldtartaglia4459 5 років тому +6

      No they are not worth the cost. 17 million? No fucking way

  • @Skull_838
    @Skull_838 5 років тому +52

    The bad and cringe rappers make Rolex look like a watch that sells high for brand name. But this video actually explains it cause of how well they're designed and made.

  • @F15ElectricEagle
    @F15ElectricEagle 4 роки тому +9

    Rolex: "I'm the most famous brand of watch on Earth".
    Omega: "Come back and talk to me after you left Earth and returned from outer space."

  • @SoLiTaRyBoNe
    @SoLiTaRyBoNe 5 років тому

    Video well done! 😁👍

  • @Mamurai
    @Mamurai 5 років тому +7

    I agree with this, although most of the cost is brand value that you pay for. There are watches out there with the same development costs, workmanship and material costs which cost about half of a Rolex.

  • @twanaomar4506
    @twanaomar4506 5 років тому +38

    *this video is sponsored to you by Rolex*

    • @ahmadalbaz6059
      @ahmadalbaz6059 5 років тому +3

      don't think so,
      i doubt people wasting their time on youtube will ever can afford a Rolex, therefore they don't need to advertise here

  • @time2livelife
    @time2livelife 3 роки тому

    I think it would also be cool if you went over how much a Rolex costs to make and compare the wholesale value to the actual price.

  • @complexandcooltechnology2049
    @complexandcooltechnology2049 4 роки тому +4

    The pricing at the beginning was a bit off

  • @nite82hawk
    @nite82hawk 5 років тому +23

    And here I was excited when I bought my $10 Coleman digital watch from Menards. It was on clearance.

  • @ste8lthy112
    @ste8lthy112 5 років тому +87

    I wear a watch of 2dollars im fine with it!

  • @alexnguyen2099
    @alexnguyen2099 4 роки тому

    Interesting, I didn't know our last King watch (Bao Dai, he was a last King in Vietnam) was sold for that much.

  • @VictorReyes-rc9xp
    @VictorReyes-rc9xp 4 роки тому +2

    As someone who’s very picky about every purchase I make and doesn’t mind paying more if it’s quality, a Rolex is a great product. It’s the kind of watch you buy once and never have to replace, it’s the kind of watch you’ll pass down to your kids and they to their grandkids.

  • @0DanielPerez0
    @0DanielPerez0 5 років тому +53

    I think one of the few seemingly "overpriced" products that are actually totally worth their price. With a Rolex, you have a great piece of jewelry and a precise tool (watching time), and being able to resell it at a profit really makes it worth it.

  • @svxw
    @svxw 5 років тому +189

    There's a lot of lack of information in this, they were the first wristwatch chronometer certified by default. They leave out a lot of important detail. Also marketing, but Rolex is nowhere near the finest brand of wristwatch in the world. Look at Vacheron Constantin, Patek Philippe, Audemars Piguet etc. A lot of Rolex was using already existing aspects of other watches and putting their twist on it. Also the name "Rolex" was also decided on because it sounded luxurious which I'd say is important information if you're trying to learn about the history of the company and brand. Its not misinformation it's just lack of key information. Also the "keep ahead of the industry curve" is not the Rolex of today. They are very stagnant and refreshing the old, like the GMT Pepsi bezel or reviving Tudor. They are no longer the cutting edge of watchmaking. This wasn't a terrible video by any means but if you're going to make a video on such an established brand at least do it right.

    • @devgtia
      @devgtia 5 років тому

      silver player hi mate

    • @marcjudge680
      @marcjudge680 5 років тому +5

      Well put.

    • @samuelsutanto6948
      @samuelsutanto6948 5 років тому +6

      Man you did your research

    • @Unikumhimself
      @Unikumhimself 5 років тому +6

      I don't agree to what ur saying, Rolex does allot of cutting edge in watchmaking, and yes it is one of the finest sports watches out there, it is a difference between hi-horology and horology, you dont compare an ap, pp, or VC to a rolex, because it is totaly different watches. But rolex today are doin what Porsche are doing, they are refining the same models to become better and better. and that is inovation and refinment, and they do cutting edge techonlogy, name me a PP or AP that has a service interval of 10 years?

    • @VeriStrawberi
      @VeriStrawberi 5 років тому +8

      Found the watch guy.

  • @joshcosco2
    @joshcosco2 4 роки тому

    You guys should do one of these videos on Patek Philip and Richard Mille

  • @andyw1g386
    @andyw1g386 4 роки тому +1

    Love my Rolex Datejust

    • @geronimojunior3095
      @geronimojunior3095 4 роки тому

      Congratulations it’s a nice watch 👍 I would like to buy a 114060 I tried hard but it’s impossible from the retailers they said to me it’s 10years of waiting list and I’m not gonna buy from the grey market so I ended up buying another watch now, still waiting for my submariner though 👍

    • @khalilrazak6486
      @khalilrazak6486 4 роки тому +2

      Some people have more money than sense.