‘Inside Out 2’ and Pixar’s Mount Rushmore Movies | Ringer Movies
Вставка
- Опубліковано 28 вер 2024
- Sean Fennessey and Amanda Dobbins are joined by the most controversial culture critic in the world, Charles Holmes. They discuss what is speculated to be the animated film of the summer, ‘Inside Out 2.’ They then pick a Pixar film that best matches each president depicted on Mt. Rushmore.
SUBSCRIBE TO OUR RINGER CHANNELS
The Ringer-Verse UA-cam channel: / @ringerverse
The Bill Simmons UA-cam channel: / billsimmons
CONNECT
Shop: theringer.com/...
Website: theringer.com
Twitter: / ringer
Facebook: / ringer
Instagram: / ringer
![[UA] Eternal Fire проти NAVI | EPL Season 20 Malta](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/chvlsDygrZM/mqdefault.jpg)
The pods have always been great but having these on video just takes it to another level. So Charles has no notes ever
Don't do meet and greet with Elmo it's a giant tmnt2 version of Elmo that does nothing but terrify. Don't introduce your kids to characters that are slowly suffocating in their costumes. It's hard to catch a terrified two year old in a crowd.
Eagerly awaiting the Ringer History Dad Channel.
I live in Texas so I really like the Alamo Drafthouse. These theaters use to have better food, but it’s changed since post pandemic.
The SF Alamo Drafthouse is the only one that actually feels good, because it's the old Mission theater.
Didn't care for Ren Faire, especially when compared to Lance's first documentary. I felt like the first episode wrote checks the rest of the series didn't cash. Although the hidden audio of the firing of a certain employee almost makes the three hour enterprise worth it.
I can stand the take that Pixar makes animated films that adults can actually get something out of is a bad thing. I'd rather have that then something like Illumination which is the poster child for kid drags their parent to the movie and they are tortured for 1.5-2 Hours. Movies that are ok for kids to see but can also be legit great films that stand toe to toe with some of the most thought provoking stuff out there are welcome to me.
Onward is top tier Pixar
Did those Crayons form a union?? Tho it's gotta be G Washington is Toy Story, Monsters Inc is Jefferson, Lincoln is The Incredibles, and Wall-E as Teddy. Bobby knows how to create a chaos cocktail so well
this Holmes guy is just insufferable. I've tried many times.
Herman's head!
"the most controversial culture critic in the world" - Goddamn... Y'all went hard in this man's description! LOL
The way sean talks about his daughters choices its worth noting that (I think, time is weird) she isn't 4 yet.
I have a seven year old boy and say what you will of dances with wolves but of his own volution he sat through and appreciated the movie when he was five. Of his own choice, not push-prompted. And im kids content I would have said he was very discerning up until 6, but he wasn't really aware of the option of ordering anything that wasnt on rhe menu.
At seven he views ninjago as the pinnacle of all media. Everything has to be action or ghosts and he flees the room when feelings come up if there isn't a battle at the same time.
Tonight we are watching mary poppins 2 simply because he still likes mary poppins and we're trying to peel him back. I am very excited about it. Also, I hate mary poppins 2.
Maybe it's easier to create an agreed on walled comtent garden of content with girls (not to be gender normy but there are far fewer girls who need their protagonists to be holding a weapon at all times, and the stuff they're into seems not to require a decade of catching up.
But I guess it's normal. And throwaway kids movies aren't always bad. Not everything has to be Totoro.
We're seeing inside out 2 this weekend. Our last two theatre movies have been ghistbusters FE and indiana jones. Really hope he's into it.
What is the actual fuck is this format
Less Charles
Nah. We love Chuck.
so much less
@@commaJim no we don't. He's contrarian strictly for the sake of being so almost 100% of the time. And for someone so judgmental and critical of the quality of things, what he himself brings to a podcast is severely wanting. You want to find issue with almost everything, you best bring it yourself when you have a platform like his.
And you especially better not tell me to go watch a cartoon when I see some of the actual cinema you find fault with.
@mikecat6291 You need to remember that most people are not mcu or star wars fanboys, so when someone doesn't like these properties most of us don't care. So yes more charles
@@menelikiii5004 I really don't mind that he finds a lot of that stuff garbage, because it surely is. And the Midnight Boys can be super egregious the other way when overlooking the flaws in MCU especially, so I appreciate there is someone there to bring them back down to Earth. But, boy, do I wish it were anyone but Charles.
why is charles here...
Coco has to be there
Can we get more Amanda and friends and less Sean interviews?
First of all everyone, Bobby is great. Second of all, Sean keep the beard!
I loved this. I'm tired of always talking about favorites or best. This made you really think. And i didnt dislike Charles as much as normal🤣 thanks big pic
Would love it if you made the interviews available on UA-cam. I'm trying to share the Lance Oppenheim interview with someone, and having a clip here would make it easier to share!
1:05:35 "Also, half of Wall-E doesn't work." LMAO WHAT? so unserious
Wall-E is one of my favorites. Its a beautiful movie imo
Loved "Inside Out", enjoyed "Inside Out 2". The sequel didn't have nearly enough of the humor. Too much anxiety, not enough funny. Needed more Ennui. Simple, really.
i like the idea of matching the films up with presidents, but it is flawed. only because the mt rushmore of u.s. presidents probably looks a tiny bit different than the physical one we've in s.d.
53:00 the scene with anxiety turning into a tornado reminded me of how i felt watching uncut gems so that for me might have been what they were talking about, just my take tho
Charles needs to be on The Big Picture more often. He’s suited for this type of criticism of pop and film culture. His takes are nowhere near as bad as they are on The Midnight Boy. He’s actually on point on this pod.
Labeling yourself as controversial is the lamest thing in the world. I really dislike Charles
I'm with ya. Screams one of those types who tries to hard to take the other pov, no matter what it is. Being a contrarian became a thing for an awful lot of adults in the last 15 years or so, I find. They seem to think it's a sign of intelligence and makes good conversation. They're way off on both counts.
Bring Charles on more.
Him and Dobbins seem to be on the same wavelength a lot, except for on the fall guy
No
#DOBBMOB Stand Up!!! 💪🏾
I’m curious if movie studios start owning theaters, would they restructure their movie releasing where they experiment more with putting a movie through a theatrical run before putting it on their streaming services.
I’m glad you posted this. Love Bobby, but what a bad idea. I’m surprised Sean didn’t speak up.
I thought it was a great podcast
justice for Coco (2017)
also, Up?
“The worlds most controversial culture critic”
Being an insufferable cringemeister…isn’t all that controversial in 2024😂
Yeah it’s pretty par for the course if you spend any amount of time on the internet. Charles is just the manifestation of the internet with nothing unique or interesting to say about anything.
@@Redjack10Ditto!
Wait, what? So there's no controversy about being insufferable..? That seems oxymoronic
@@commaJim If being insufferable is “controversial” in 2024…I think you need to pass the message along to society.
They euphemistically refer to him as “The most controversial”…because people, almost universally, dislike him.
They don’t dislike him because he says “controversial” things…it’s because his personality is sophomoric and cringe inducing. He’s the kind of guy that will make you second guess yourself if your opinions align with his, because he’s obviously not that bright.
In the end, everything can be described as “controversial” in the context of disagreement…well, everything except the fact that Charles is an absolute cringemeister.😂
I'd go so far as to say 'wild hot take podcaster/personality' is officially mainstream.
Sean cooks at 33:16
They used to have most of the podcasts available to listen to but now they're all gone from UA-cam. What happened?
you can do both
12:06 - One day, we’ll get Sean into Haikyuu and he’ll understand why we’re so into it.
We're in our forties, this will never make sense to us. We watched Ninja Scroll once, got a kick out of it, but we weren't reared by Japan like you lot! And living in this day and age, we don't really need to add more stuff to our media consumption that infantilizes us. Especially when we can't turn on a movie or television show these days that doesn't rip straight from our childhood!
But hey, we had Ninja Turtles, Star Wars and Transformers and you guys have whatever the hell Japanese word you just said. Who is to say which is more worthwhile? I have no doubt one day we'll be watching Hakiyu reboots as your generation comes into their own as showrunners and directors. And so we beat on, boats against the current, borne back ceaselessly into the past.
I don’t like either properties much? I’m a PTA, Fincher Ringer guy-lol you got the wrong one! But nice try being clever. I just find him annoying!!!
Very surprised by all the Alamo slander - I much prefer it to an AMC/Regal/Cinemark type theater! Although I’ve only ever been to the Raleigh and Austin locations
Charles Holmes is right as usual. Tried my hardest to find the Uncut Gems in at all, and came up short besides maybe some occasional visuals when anxiety is driving and Riley is being a twit. Thank you for your service sir.
Charles loving Ratatouille is pun intended chef's kiss
Sean is on point. IO is fine but second-tier Pixar. That said, my 17 year old son and his friends lovvvve the movie. Hmm, may be a generational thing.
Kids episode
Re: Roosevelt, “despite being a member of the Republican Party…” Tell me, what party was Lincoln in? This far back any baggage you have with party affiliation today isn’t going to fit. Same with your characterization of Roosevelt as “progressive” vis a vis the progressive party - it doesn’t mean he was a bodies and spaces liberal type. Woodrow Wilson was a major leader in the Progressive Movement and he was insanely racist even by the standards of his time.
I’m surprised you have such a high opinion of T. Roosevelt given the tenor of every other political comment you make on the show. Roosevelt was:
- a fancy lad rich kid
- a police commissioner
- a self-aware imperialist
- someone who thought war was a fun adventure, basically an excuse to dress up with your friends and larp as a cowboy
He very much did usher in the modern America in the sense of self consciously extending American military and colonial/adminstrative power as far around the world as possible. Both as VP and as president. He didn’t fight in Spain, he fought the Spanish for control of Cuba (he is largely responsible for starting the Spanish American War as VP), leading to America’s de jure dominion over Cuba until Castro’s revolution. Think of how integral the anti colonial movement is to the dynamics of the Cold War, to global capitalism, etc. He set it in motion with America in the driver’s seat. Given everything else you say about politics (decrying copaganda, making fun of MAGA) I’d think you would also have a more critical assessment of Roosevelt’s legacy but I guess not. Possibly bc you don’t know as much as you think (ex: saying he was a solider fighting in Spain). But please say again how stupid school is.
No more letting Bobby helm a episode. However, I love y’all
Charles on the Big Pic, already a great episode
disagree